Hostname: page-component-686fd747b7-26cps Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-13T13:23:00.399Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A cooperative–competitive perspective of ownership necessitates an understanding of ownership disagreements

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 October 2023

Margaret Echelbarger Open the ORCID record for Margaret Echelbarger [Opens in a new window]  and
Stephanie M. Tully Open the ORCID record for Stephanie M. Tully [Opens in a new window]
Margaret Echelbarger
Affiliation:
College of Business, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY, USA margaret.echelbarger@stonybrook.edu
Stephanie M. Tully
Affiliation:
Marshall School of Business, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA tullyste@marshall.usc.edu
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Boyer's cognitive model of ownership, based on cooperation and competition, underscores the importance of studying disagreements in ownership. We argue that exploring the factors that can lead to different perceptions and experiences of ownership will uniquely inform our understanding of legal, psychological, and perceived ownership beliefs.

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Information
Behavioral and Brain Sciences , Volume 46 , 2023 , e333
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2023. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Atasoy, O., & Morewedge, C. K. (2018). Digital goods are valued less than physical goods. Journal of Consumer Research, 44(6), 1343–1357.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beggan, J. K. (1992). On the social nature of nonsocial perception: The mere ownership effect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 62(2), 229–237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carlson, B. (2021). Prince's estate has valuable estate planning lessons for us. Forbes. https://www.forbes.com/sites/bobcarlson/2021/04/28/princes-estate-has-valuable-estate-planning-lessons-for-us.Google Scholar
De La Rosa, W., Sharma, E., Tully, S. M., Giannella, E., & Rino, G. (2021). Psychological ownership interventions increase interest in claiming government benefits. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 118(35), e2106357118.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Friedman, O. (2008). First possession: An assumption guiding inferences about who owns what. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 15, 290–295.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Friedman, O., & Neary, K. R. (2008). Determining who owns what: Do children infer ownership from first possession? Cognition, 107(3), 829–849.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Honoré, A. M. (2013). Ownership. In Coleman, J. L. (Ed.), Readings in the philosophy of law (pp. 563–564). Routledge.Google Scholar
Norton, M. I., Mochon, D., & Ariely, D. (2012). The IKEA effect: When labor leads to love. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 22(3), 453–460.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Palamar, M., Le, D. T., & Friedman, O. (2012). Acquiring ownership and the attribution of responsibility. Cognition, 124(2), 201–208.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Peck, J., Kirk, C. P., Luangrath, A. W., & Shu, S. B. (2021). Caring for the commons: Using psychological ownership to enhance stewardship behavior for public goods. Journal of Marketing, 85(2), 33–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peck, J., & Shu, S. B. (2009). The effect of mere touch on perceived ownership. Journal of Consumer Research, 36(3), 434–447.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pesowski, M. L., Nancekivell, S. E., Tasimi, A., & Friedman, O. (2022). Ownership and value in childhood. Annual Review of Developmental Psychology, 4, 161–183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pierce, J. L., Kostova, T., & Dirks, K. T. (2001). Toward a theory of psychological ownership in organizations. Academy of Management Review, 26(2), 298–310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Preston, S. D., & Gelman, S. A. (2020). This land is my land: Psychological ownership increases willingness to protect the natural world more than legal ownership. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 70, 101443.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ross, H., Friedman, O., & Field, A. (2015). Toddlers assert and acknowledge ownership rights. Social Development, 24(2), 341–356.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd., et al. v. Apple Inc., 137 S. Ct. 429 (2016).Google Scholar
Sharma, E., Tully, S., & Cryder, C. (2021). Psychological ownership of (borrowed) money. Journal of Marketing Research, 58(3), 497–514.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thaler, R. (1980). Toward a positive theory of consumer choice. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 1(1), 39–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar