Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
  1. Home
  2. Journals
  3. European Journal of Risk Regulation
  4. Content listing
Journal Home

Refine listing

Refine listing

Access:
Content type:
Publication date:
Apply   From and To filters
Subject: Show more
Journals: Show more
Publishers: Show more
Societies: Show more
Series: Show more
Collections: Show more

Actions for selected content:

Select all | Deselect all
  • View selected items
  • Export citations
  • Download PDF (zip)
  • Save to Kindle
  • Save to Dropbox
  • Save to Google Drive

Save Search

You can save your searches here and later view and run them again in "My saved searches".

Please provide a title, maximum of 40 characters.
Cancel
×

1351 results in European Journal of Risk Regulation

Page 31 of 68

  • Crossing Bridges at High Speed. On the Future of Risk Research

  • Geert VAN CALSTER, Kathleen GARNETT
  • Journal:
    European Journal of Risk Regulation / Volume 8 / Issue 1 / March 2017
    Published online by Cambridge University Press:
    26 April 2017, pp. 52-55
    • Article
      • You have access
    • PDF
    • HTML
    • Export citation

  • The ELD: Applicability to Nanotechnology Risk and the Liability Implications of Environmental Damage

  • Karena HESTER, Martin MULLINS, Robert FORD, Finbarr MURPHY
  • Journal:
    European Journal of Risk Regulation / Volume 8 / Issue 1 / March 2017
    Published online by Cambridge University Press:
    26 April 2017, pp. 140-157
    • Article
      • You have access
    • PDF
    • HTML
    • Export citation

  • This paper examines the potential impact of the European Union’s Environmental Liability Directive (ELD)1 on the nanotechnology (NT) sector. In terms of risk governance the ELD represents a new paradigm, affording the environment an enhanced status both in legal and indeed ontological terms. However, the nature of the NT industry itself is such as to create complexity in the implementation of the ELD. Whilst the field of nano-toxicology is making advances, debate still prevails around issues pertaining to exposure, (eco)-toxicity, metrics, potential impact and legal causation. Levels of uncertainty remain high and hence measuring environmental impact is problematic. The paper addresses the potential environmental liability exposures of NT manufacturers and producers pursuant to the provisions of the ELD and by extension highlights the importance of the insurability of the liability risk all of which bears significance for the sustainability of the industry. It also examines the legal and regulatory challenges of the application of the ELD in the context of the NT industry, highlighting the challenges which this pervasive technology presents for regulatory policy. A cursory discussion of the legal theoretical underpinning of the directive helps to explain the rationale of the directive.

  • Risk Regulation and Future Learning

  • Jonathan B. WIENER
  • Journal:
    European Journal of Risk Regulation / Volume 8 / Issue 1 / March 2017
    Published online by Cambridge University Press:
    26 April 2017, pp. 4-9
    • Article
      • You have access
    • PDF
    • HTML
    • Export citation

  • The Obligation to Undertake an Environmental Assessment in the Jurisprudence of the ICJ: A Principle in Search of Autonomy

  • Elisa RUOZZI
  • Journal:
    European Journal of Risk Regulation / Volume 8 / Issue 1 / March 2017
    Published online by Cambridge University Press:
    26 April 2017, pp. 158-169
    • Article
      • You have access
    • PDF
    • HTML
    • Export citation

  • The practice of carrying out an environmental impact assessment (EIA) has gained strength in international law and jurisprudence, finding application in the case law of the International Court of Justice (ICJ). If, on the one hand, the ICJ has recognized the customary nature of this principle, on the other its application poses a set of challenges, mainly linked to the autonomy of this obligation from other international environmental law norms. More precisely, the obligation at issue has been applied in connection with the due diligence and notification principles, creating uncertainty about its scope, as well as about its substantive or procedural nature. Likewise, the autonomy of the obligation to perform an EIA has been challenged in relation to the definition of the content and scope of the obligation itself, which in turn is linked to the existence of applicable treaty provisions or of soft law. This article discusses the impact of these elements on the reasoning of the Court in the cases at issue, in order to demonstrate how such lack of autonomy can undermine the coherence of the reasoning itself and, therefore, an effective application of the principle.

  • Regulating the Risk of Trumpism

  • Thomas BURRI
  • Journal:
    European Journal of Risk Regulation / Volume 8 / Issue 1 / March 2017
    Published online by Cambridge University Press:
    26 April 2017, pp. 64-66
    • Article
      • You have access
    • PDF
    • HTML
    • Export citation

  • Dysfunction and Disruption: Disaster Risks and the Law

  • Kristian Cedervall LAUTA
  • Journal:
    European Journal of Risk Regulation / Volume 8 / Issue 1 / March 2017
    Published online by Cambridge University Press:
    26 April 2017, pp. 83-87
    • Article
      • You have access
    • PDF
    • HTML
    • Export citation

  • The Past, Present and Future of Risk Regulation

  • Alberto ALEMANNO
  • Journal:
    European Journal of Risk Regulation / Volume 8 / Issue 1 / March 2017
    Published online by Cambridge University Press:
    26 April 2017, pp. 1-3
    • Article
      • You have access
    • PDF
    • HTML
    • Export citation

  • ERR volume 8 issue 1 Cover and Front matter

  • Journal:
    European Journal of Risk Regulation / Volume 8 / Issue 1 / March 2017
    Published online by Cambridge University Press:
    26 April 2017, pp. f1-f7
    • Article
      • You have access
    • PDF
    • Export citation

  • Returning to Risk Regulation after a Long Journey

  • Anne-Lise SIBONY
  • Journal:
    European Journal of Risk Regulation / Volume 8 / Issue 1 / March 2017
    Published online by Cambridge University Press:
    26 April 2017, pp. 112-114
    • Article
      • You have access
    • PDF
    • HTML
    • Export citation

  • Three Decades of EU Risk Regulation Research

  • Ellen VOS
  • Journal:
    European Journal of Risk Regulation / Volume 8 / Issue 1 / March 2017
    Published online by Cambridge University Press:
    26 April 2017, pp. 47-51
    • Article
      • You have access
    • PDF
    • HTML
    • Export citation

  • For nearly three decades scholars have studied issues of EU risk regulation, first presented as regulation of safety of products and persons,1 later on as true issues of risk regulation. This short comment will give brief, and at times personal, insights into the development on scholarly thinking on EU risk regulation and sketch a few challenges for the future.

  • Risks and Risk Regulation: Personal Reflections

  • Francis SNYDER
  • Journal:
    European Journal of Risk Regulation / Volume 8 / Issue 1 / March 2017
    Published online by Cambridge University Press:
    26 April 2017, pp. 18-23
    • Article
      • You have access
    • PDF
    • HTML
    • Export citation

  • Risk Regulation: Hic et Ubique

  • Alexia HERWIG
  • Journal:
    European Journal of Risk Regulation / Volume 8 / Issue 1 / March 2017
    Published online by Cambridge University Press:
    26 April 2017, pp. 43-46
    • Article
      • You have access
    • PDF
    • HTML
    • Export citation

  • Regulation and Risk Today

  • Colin SCOTT
  • Journal:
    European Journal of Risk Regulation / Volume 8 / Issue 1 / March 2017
    Published online by Cambridge University Press:
    26 April 2017, pp. 24-27
    • Article
      • You have access
    • PDF
    • HTML
    • Export citation

  • Risk Regulation at Risk. Brexit, Trump it, Risk it

  • Stijn SMISMANS
  • Journal:
    European Journal of Risk Regulation / Volume 8 / Issue 1 / March 2017
    Published online by Cambridge University Press:
    26 April 2017, pp. 33-42
    • Article
      • You have access
    • PDF
    • HTML
    • Export citation

Page 31 of 68