Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-b6zl4 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-06T05:59:53.625Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The role of mortality concerns in separation and connection effects: comment on Lee and Schwarz

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 February 2021

Dylan E. Horner
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona 85721-0068. dylanehorner@email.arizona.edu jeff@arizona.edu
Jeff Greenberg
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona 85721-0068. dylanehorner@email.arizona.edu jeff@arizona.edu

Abstract

Using terror management theory and research findings, we expand the framework provided by Lee and Schwarz to highlight the potential link between separation and connection effects to existential, death-related concerns. Specifically, we address how death awareness may motivate separation and connection behaviors and how engaging in these behaviors may serve a protective terror management function.

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press

Presenting a grounded procedures perspective in their target article, Lee and Schwarz proposed that engaging in physical acts of separation (e.g., cleansing) or connection (e.g., touching) activates a sense of mental separation or connection by either attenuating the influence of prior experience or mentally connecting one entity to another, respectively. This perspective offers a useful framework for better understanding such processes. We extend this framework by highlighting how people's efforts to manage their concerns about mortality contribute to mental and physical forms of separation and connection.

Terror management theory (TMT; Greenberg, Pyszczynski, & Solomon, Reference Greenberg, Pyszczynski, Solomon and Baumeister1986; Greenberg, Vail, & Pyszczynski, Reference Greenberg, Vail and Pyszczynski2014) proposes that humans are uniquely aware of mortality and that much of human behavior is geared toward managing the potential for anxiety engendered by this awareness. People manage death-related concerns by maintaining faith in both a culturally-derived worldview that imbues life with meaning and purpose and their sense of being valued contributors to that meaningful world (for review, see Routledge & Vess, Reference Routledge and Vess2019). Being so valued provides a sense that one's identity will last beyond physical death through an immortal soul or one's links and contributions to the ongoing culture (e.g., offspring and scientific accomplishments). Supporting research has found that (1) mortality salience (MS) leads people to defend their worldviews and strive for self-esteem (e.g., Arndt, Greenberg, Pyszczynski, & Solomon, Reference Arndt, Greenberg, Pyszczynski and Solomon1997; Taubman Ben-Ari, Florian, & Mikulincer, Reference Taubman Ben-Ari, Florian and Mikulincer1999; Zestcott, Lifshin, Helm, & Greenberg, Reference Zestcott, Lifshin, Helm and Greenberg2016); (2) bolstering self-esteem or their worldview can prevent typical MS-induced defensiveness (Harmon-Jones et al., Reference Harmon-Jones, Simon, Greenberg, Pyszczynski, Solomon and McGregor1997; Schmeichel & Martens, Reference Schmeichel and Martens2005); and (3) self-esteem and worldview threats increase death-thought accessibility (DTA; Hayes, Schimel, Faucher, & Williams, Reference Hayes, Schimel, Faucher and Williams2008; Schimel, Hayes, Williams, & Jahrig, Reference Schimel, Hayes, Williams and Jahrig2007). Collectively, this work supports the basic tenets of TMT but also points to interesting links between death awareness and both separation and connection behaviors.

Specifically, in line with this research, there are conditions in which (1) MS may motivate physical separation and connection behaviors; (2) engaging in these behaviors may reduce terror management defenses; and (3) certain antecedent events of these behaviors may be tied to increased DTA. One way that people defend against death awareness is by denying the human association with animality; as in most modern cultures, nonhuman animals are not granted the literal or symbolic bases of death transcendence that cultures grant us humans. Research has shown that MS and exposure to stimuli that link humans to animals (e.g., feces, blood, and breast-feeding) can increase disgust, DTA, and physical distancing (for review, see Goldenberg, Morris, & Boyd, Reference Goldenberg, Morris, Boyd, Routledge and Vess2019). Moreover, MS has been shown to increase support for the killing of animals (Lifshin, Greenberg, Zestcott, & Sullivan, Reference Lifshin, Greenberg, Zestcott and Sullivan2017). Other physical separation tactics – such as confining animals or physically distancing oneself from reminders of animality – might also serve this terror management function by bolstering a sense of mental distinction between humans and animals.

Such processes may also be implicated in other domains. For example, research on separation effects has found that social exclusion and exposure to out-group related stimuli can instigate cleansing behavior (e.g., Poon, Reference Poon2019; Reicher, Templeton, Neville, Ferrari, & Drury, Reference Reicher, Templeton, Neville, Ferrari and Drury2016); moreover, engaging in cleansing behaviors can attenuate the mental connection between oneself and prior events (e.g., reducing pessimism after academic failure; Kaspar, Reference Kaspar2012). Relatedly, threats to close relationships, exposure to out-groups, and threats to self-esteem have all been shown to increase DTA, and ameliorating these events – for instance, through affirming one's value or worldview – can reduce DTA (for review, see Hayes, Schimel, Arndt, & Faucher, Reference Hayes, Schimel, Arndt and Faucher2010). Thus, one possibility is that physical acts of connection or separation might also provide a buffering function by enabling people to either feel connected to meaningful and death-transcendent entities or feel mentally disassociated from the threats to one's bases of meaning and personal significance. Indeed, a substantial body of prior literature has shown that MS leads to mental forms of connection – by increasing praise and reward and seeking closeness with those who validate one's worldview and self-worth – as well as mental forms of separation – by increasing derogation of, and physical aggression toward, those with different worldviews (e.g., Cox & Arndt, Reference Cox and Arndt2012; Greenberg et al., Reference Greenberg, Pyszczynski, Solomon, Rosenblatt, Veeder, Kirkland and Lyon1990; McGregor et al., Reference McGregor, Lieberman, Greenberg, Solomon, Arndt, Simon and Pyszczynski1998). Thus, separating and connecting physical acts conferring corresponding mental states clearly sometimes serve a terror management function.

In one study particularly illustrative of this, MS led to more reluctance to engage in (i.e., separating from) acts involving using cultural icons in inappropriate ways (e.g., pouring ink through an American flag; Greenberg, Porteus, Simon, Pyszczynski, & Solomon, Reference Greenberg, Porteus, Simon, Pyszczynski and Solomon1995), as these symbols represent participants' worldview. Similarly, people may feel buffered against death awareness when connecting appropriately with objects representing the culture, and MS may motivate people to seek out such experiences. In doing so, people may feel more mentally connected to these transcendent entities through personal physical connection (e.g., wearing a pin of one's national flag, touching the hand of a cherished religious leader). On the other hand, regarding separation effects, cleansing oneself of existential threats (e.g., destroying the works and monuments of an opposing worldview, throwing away a reminder of a failed attempt toward self-esteem) may re-affirm one's sense of worth and reduce DTA.

Finally, the usefulness of physical acts of separation and connection to manage death-related anxieties, as well as the likelihood of such engagement, might vary across individuals. For example, research has shown that MS increases time spent washing hands for those who rate high (but not those who rate low) on a measure of compulsive hand washing (Menzies & Dar-Nimrod, Reference Menzies and Dar-Nimrod2017; Strachan et al., Reference Strachan, Schimel, Arndt, Williams, Solomon, Pyszczynski and Greenberg2007). Moreover, various forms of physical touch and approach to members of one's culture appear to be effective death-anxiety buffers, especially for those with low self-esteem (e.g., Koole, Tjew, Sin, & Schneider, Reference Koole, Tjew, Sin and Schneider2014). These findings suggest that certain physical acts of separation and connection may be more readily used by some over others to manage death awareness.

Although a comprehensive analysis on the role of mortality concerns in separation and connection effects is beyond the current scope, the research we have reviewed suggests that an integration of the grounded procedures perspective and TMT would be a fruitful basis for future research and a fuller understanding of both acts of separation and connection and how people manage death-related concerns.

Financial support

This work received no specific grant from any funding agency, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.

Conflict of interest

None.

References

Arndt, J., Greenberg, J., Pyszczynski, T., & Solomon, S. (1997). Subliminal exposure to death-related stimuli increases defense of the cultural worldview. Psychological Science, 8(5), 379385. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.1997.tb00429.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cox, C. R., & Arndt, J. (2012). How sweet it is to be loved by you: The role of perceived regard in the terror management of close relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 102(3), 616632. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0025947.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Goldenberg, J. L., Morris, K. L., & Boyd, P. (2019). Terror management is for the birds and the bees: An existential perspective on the threat associated with human corporeality. In Routledge, C. & Vess, M. (Eds.), Handbook of terror management theory (pp. 227242). San Diego, CA: Elsevier Academic Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greenberg, J., Porteus, J., Simon, L., Pyszczynski, T., & Solomon, S. (1995). Evidence of a terror management function of cultural icons: The effects of mortality salience on the inappropriate use of cherished cultural symbols. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 21(11), 12211228. https://doi.org/10.1177/01461672952111010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greenberg, J., Pyszczynski, T., & Solomon, S. (1986). The causes and consequences of a need for self-esteem: A terror management theory. In Baumeister, R. F. (Ed.), Public self and private self (pp. 189212). Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greenberg, J., Pyszczynski, T., Solomon, S., Rosenblatt, A., Veeder, M., Kirkland, S., & Lyon, D. (1990). Evidence for terror management theory II: The effects of mortality salience on reactions to those who threaten or bolster the cultural worldview. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 58(2), 308318.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greenberg, J., Vail, K., & Pyszczynski, T. (2014). Terror management theory and research: How the desire for death transcendence drives our strivings for meaning and significance. In Advances in motivation science (pp. 85134). Elsevier Academic Press.Google Scholar
Harmon-Jones, E., Simon, L., Greenberg, J., Pyszczynski, T., Solomon, S., & McGregor, H. (1997). Terror management theory and self-esteem: Evidence that increased self-esteem reduces mortality salience effects. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72(1), 2436.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hayes, J., Schimel, J., Arndt, J., & Faucher, E. H. (2010). A theoretical and empirical review of the death-thought accessibility concept in terror management research. Psychological Bulletin, 136(5), 699739. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0020524.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hayes, J., Schimel, J., Faucher, E. H., & Williams, T. J. (2008). Evidence for the DTA hypothesis II: Threatening self-esteem increases death thought accessibility. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 44(3), 600613. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2008.01.004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaspar, K. (2012). Washing one's hands after failure enhances optimism but hampers future performance. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 4(1), 6973. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550612443267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koole, S. L., Tjew, A, Sin, M., & Schneider, I. K. (2014). Embodied terror management: Interpersonal touch alleviates existential concerns among individuals with low self-esteem. Psychological Science, 25(1), 3037. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797613483478.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lifshin, U., Greenberg, J., Zestcott, C. A., & Sullivan, D. (2017). The evil animal: A terror management theory perspective on the human tendency to kill animals. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 43(6), 743757. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167217697092.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McGregor, H. A., Lieberman, J. D., Greenberg, J., Solomon, S., Arndt, J., Simon, L., & Pyszczynski, T. (1998). Terror management and aggression: Evidence that mortality salience motivates aggression against worldview-threatening others. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74(3), 590605.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Menzies, R. E., & Dar-Nimrod, I. (2017). Death anxiety and its relationship with obsessive-compulsive disorder. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 126(4), 367377.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Poon, K.-T. (2019). Do you reap what you sow? The effect of cyberostracism on moral impurity. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 41(2), 132146. https://doi.org/10.1080/01973533.2019.1585353.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reicher, S. D., Templeton, A., Neville, F., Ferrari, L., & Drury, J. (2016). Core disgust is attenuated by ingroup relations. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 113(10), 26312635. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1517027113.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Routledge, C., & Vess, M. (2019). Handbook of terror management. Elsevier Academic Press.Google Scholar
Schimel, J., Hayes, J., Williams, T., & Jahrig, J. (2007). Is death really the worm at the core? Converging evidence that worldview threat increases death-thought accessibility. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 92(5), 789803. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.92.5.789.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schmeichel, B. J., & Martens, A. (2005). Self-affirmation and mortality salience: Affirming values reduces worldview defense and death-thought accessibility. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 31(5), 658667. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167204271567.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Strachan, E., Schimel, J., Arndt, J., Williams, T., Solomon, S., Pyszczynski, T., & Greenberg, J. (2007). Terror mismanagement: Evidence that mortality salience exacerbates phobic and compulsive behaviors. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 33(8), 11371151. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167207303018.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Taubman Ben-Ari, O., Florian, V., & Mikulincer, M. (1999). The impact of mortality salience on reckless driving: A test of terror management mechanisms. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76(1), 3545. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.76.1.35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zestcott, C. A., Lifshin, U., Helm, P., & Greenberg, J. (2016). He dies, he scores: Evidence that reminders of death motivate improved performance in basketball. Journal of Sport & Exercise Psychology, 38, 470480. https://doi.org/10.1123/jsep.2016-0025.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed