Hostname: page-component-6dbcb7884d-q4sxc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-14T07:29:34.907Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The need for a unified framework: How Tulving's framework of memory systems, memory processes, and the SPI-model can guide and sharpen the understanding of déjà vu and involuntary autobiographical memories and add to conceptual clarity

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 November 2023

Hans J. Markowitsch Open the ORCID record for Hans J. Markowitsch [Opens in a new window] ,
Andreas Kordon  and
Angelica Staniloiu
Hans J. Markowitsch
Affiliation:
Physiological Psychology, University of Bielefeld, Bielefeld, Germany hjmarkowitsch@uni-bielefeld.de astaniloiu@uni-bielefeld.de
Andreas Kordon
Affiliation:
Schwarzwaldklinik Hornberg, Hornberg, Germany Department of Psychiatry, University of Freiburg, Germany andreas.wahl-kordon@oberbergkliniken.de
Angelica Staniloiu
Affiliation:
Physiological Psychology, University of Bielefeld, Bielefeld, Germany hjmarkowitsch@uni-bielefeld.de astaniloiu@uni-bielefeld.de Schwarzwaldklinik Hornberg, Hornberg, Germany
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Barzykowski and Moulin link déjà vu and involuntary autobiographical memories to the process of retrieval. They make no reference to Tulving's SPI-model. In this, it is proposed that information is acquired serially (S), stored in parallel (P), and retrieved independently (I). This model offers an alternative, elegant, view of involuntary autobiographical memory retrieval, as well as of déjà vus.

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Information
Behavioral and Brain Sciences , Volume 46 , 2023 , e369
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2023. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Borsutzky, S., Fujiwara, E., Brand, M., & Markowitsch, H. J. (2010). Susceptibility to false memories in patients with ACoA aneurysm. Neuropsychologia, 48, 2811–2823.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dew, I. T. Z., & Cabeza, R. (2011). The porous boundaries between explicit and implicit memory: Behavioral and neural evidence. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1224, 174–190.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fehr, T., Staniloiu, A., Markowitsch, H. J., Erhard, P., & Herrmann, M. (2018). Neural correlates of free recall of “famous faces” in a “hypermnestic” individual as compared to an age- and education-matched reference group. BMC Neuroscience, 19, Art. 35, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12868-018-0435-yCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Henke, K. A. (2010). A model for memory systems based on processing modes rather than consciousness. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 11, 523–532.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mishkin, M., & Petri, H. L. (1984). Memories and habits: Some implications for the analysis of learning and retention. In Squire, L. R. & Butters, N. (Eds.), Neuropsychology of memory (pp. 287–296). Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Nelson, K., & Fivush, R. (2004). The emergence of autobiographical memory: A social cultural developmental theory. Psychological Review, 111, 486–511.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
O'Connor, A. R., Wells, C., & Moulin, C. J. A. (2021). Déjà vu and other dissociative states in memory. Memory, 29, 835–842.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Risius, U.-M., Staniloiu, A., Piefke, M., Maderwald, S., Schulte, F., Brand, M., & Markowitsch, H. J. (2013). Retrieval, monitoring and control processes: A 7 Tesla fMRI approach to memory accuracy. Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience, 7, Art. 24, 1–21. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnbeh.2013.00024CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schacter, D., & Tulving, E. (1994). What are the memory systems of 1994? In Schacter, D. & Tulving, E. (Eds.), Memory systems 1994 (pp. 1–38). MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schacter, D. L., Wagner, A. D., & Buckner, R. L. (2000). Memory systems of 1999. In Tulving, E. & Craik, F. I. M. (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of memory (pp. 627–644). Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Squire, L. R. (2004) Memory systems of the brain: A brief history and current perspective. Neurobiology of Learning and Memory, 82, 171–177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Staniloiu, A., Kordon, A., & Markowitsch, H. J. (2020). Quo vadis episodic memory – past, present, perspective. Neuropsychologia, 141, Art. 10736, 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2020.107362CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Staniloiu, A., & Markowitsch, H. J. (2012). The remains of the day in dissociative amnesia. Brain Sciences, 2, 101–129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tulving, E. (1972). Episodic and semantic memory. In Tulving, E. & Donaldson, W. (Eds.), Organization of memory (pp. 381–403). Academic Press.Google Scholar
Tulving, E. (1995). Organization of memory: Quo vadis? In Gazzaniga, M. S. (Ed.), The cognitive neurosciences (pp. 839–847). MIT Press.Google Scholar
Tulving, E. (2005). Episodic memory and autonoesis: Uniquely human? In Terrace, H. & Metcalfe, J. (Eds.), The missing link in cognition: Evolution of self-knowing consciousness (pp. 3–56). Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Tulving, E., & Markowitsch, H. J. (1998). Episodic and declarative memory: Role of the hippocampus. Hippocampus, 8, 198–204.3.0.CO;2-G>CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed