Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-grxwn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-11T10:02:47.513Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

An overview on Leishmania (Mundinia) enriettii: biology, immunopathology, LRV and extracellular vesicles during the host–parasite interaction

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 December 2017

Larissa F. Paranaiba ,
Lucélia J. Pinheiro ,
Diego H. Macedo ,
Armando Menezes-Neto ,
Ana C. Torrecilhas ,
Wagner L. Tafuri  and
Rodrigo P. Soares
Larissa F. Paranaiba
Affiliation:
Departamento de Parasitologia, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais – UFMG, Av. Antônio Carlos, 6627 – Pampulha, 31270-901, Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, Brazil
Lucélia J. Pinheiro
Affiliation:
Departamento de Patologia Geral, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais – UFMG, Av Antônio Carlos, 6627 – Pampulha, 31270-901, Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, Brazil
Diego H. Macedo
Affiliation:
Centro de Pesquisas René Rachou/Fundação Oswaldo Cruz – CpqRR/FIOCRUZ, Av. Augusto de Lima, 1715 – Barro Preto, 30.190-009, Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, Brazil
Armando Menezes-Neto
Affiliation:
Centro de Pesquisas René Rachou/Fundação Oswaldo Cruz – CpqRR/FIOCRUZ, Av. Augusto de Lima, 1715 – Barro Preto, 30.190-009, Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, Brazil
Ana C. Torrecilhas
Affiliation:
Departamento de Farmácia, Universidade Federal de São Paulo – UNIFESP, Av. São Nicolau, 210, 09913-030, Diadema, São Paulo, Brazil
Wagner L. Tafuri
Affiliation:
Departamento de Patologia Geral, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais – UFMG, Av Antônio Carlos, 6627 – Pampulha, 31270-901, Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, Brazil
Rodrigo P. Soares*
Affiliation:
Centro de Pesquisas René Rachou/Fundação Oswaldo Cruz – CpqRR/FIOCRUZ, Av. Augusto de Lima, 1715 – Barro Preto, 30.190-009, Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, Brazil
*
Author for correspondence: Rodrigo P. Soares, E-mail: rsoares@cpqrr.fiocruz.br
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

One of the Leishmania species known to be non-infective to humans is Leishmania (Mundinia) enriettii whose vertebrate host is the guinea pig Cavia porcellus. It is a good model for cutaneous leishmaniasis, chemotherapeutic and molecular studies. In the last years, an increased interest has emerged concerning the L. (Mundinia) subgenus after the finding of Leishmania (M.) macropodum in Australia and with the description of other new/putative species such as L. (M.) martiniquensis and ‘L. (M.) siamensis’. This review focused on histopathology, glycoconjugates and innate immunity. The presence of Leishmania RNA virus and shedding of extracellular vesicles by the parasite were also evaluated.

Keywords

Leishmania (Mundinia) enriettiiL. (Mundinia) subgenusChemotherapyImmunopathologyInnate immunityGlycobiologyExtracellular vesiclesRNA virus
Type
Special Issue Review
Information
Parasitology , Volume 145 , Special Issue 10: Parasites and their (endo)symbiotic microbes , September 2018 , pp. 1265 - 1273
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2017 

Leishmaniasis

Leishmaniasis is a disease caused by protozoans of the sub-family Leishmaniinae (Jirků et al. Reference Jirků, Yurchenko, Lukeš and Maslov2012; Espinosa et al. Reference Espinosa, Serrano, Camargo, Teixeira and Shaw2016). Those parasites are transmitted by the bite of infected female sand flies from the genus Phlebotomus in the Old World and Lutzomyia in the New World (Young and Duncan, Reference Young and Duncan1994). The protozoan is able to infect rodents, marsupials, canids, hyraxes, edentates and primates (Grimaldi et al. Reference Grimaldi, Tesh and McMahon-Pratt1989; Akhoundi et al. Reference Akhoundi, Kuhls, Cannet, Votýpka and Marty2016). According to the World Health Organization, leishmaniasis is one of the six most important neglected diseases (de Guerra et al. Reference de Guerra, das Barbosa, de Loureiro, Coelho, Rosa and de Coelho2007). In Brazil, most cases are due to Leishmania braziliensis (tegumentary leishmaniasis) and Leishmania infantum (visceral leishmaniasis).

Leishmania enriettii and Leishmania (Mundinia) subgenus

Among the 50 species of Leishmania reported, approximately 20 are infectious to humans (Akhoundi et al. Reference Akhoundi, Kuhls, Cannet, Votýpka and Marty2016). One of the Leishmania species that is non-infective to humans is Leishmania (Mundinia) enriettii (Muniz and Medina, Reference Muniz and Medina1948; Machado et al. Reference Machado, Milder, Pacheco, Silva, Braga and Lainson1994; Lainson, Reference Lainson1997), whose vertebrate host is guinea pig Cavia porcellus (Rodentia: Cavida). The subgenus L. (Mundinia) has been recently established to accommodate those members formerly included within the L. enriettii complex (Espinosa et al. Reference Espinosa, Serrano, Camargo, Teixeira and Shaw2016; Paranaíba et al. Reference Paranaíba, Pinheiro, Torrecilhas, Macedo, Menezes-Neto, Tafuri and Soares2017). The subgenus was inspired by Mun (Muniz) and din (Medina) to pay tribute to the researchers that reported this parasite.

No autochthonous cutaneous leishmaniasis (CL) cases were reported in Australia until 2003. However, strong evidence of Leishmania infecting red kangaroos (Macropus rufus) was provided later (Rose et al. Reference Rose, Curtis, Baldwin, Mathis, Kumar, Sakthianandeswaren, Spurck, Low Choy and Handman2004; Dougall et al. Reference Dougall, Shilton, Low Choy, Alexander and Walton2009, Reference Dougall, Alexander, Holt, Harris, Sultan, Bates, Rose and Walton2011). Recently, the name Leishmania (M.) macropodum was formally defined (Barratt et al. Reference Barratt, Kaufer, Peters, Craig, Lawrence, Roberts and Ellis2017) and the informal name Leishmania ‘australiensis’ was discontinued to avoid usage of a nomen nudum (Australian Government, 2016). Besides the Australian isolate, other species and/or putative members of the L. (Mundinia) subgenus were reported in several parts of the world. Those included Leishmania martiniquensis in Martinica and Thailand (Boisseau-Garsaud et al. Reference Boisseau-Garsaud, Cales-Quist, Desbois, Jouannelle, Jouannelle, Pratlong and Dedet2000; Desbois et al. Reference Desbois, Pratlong, Quist and Dedet2014; Pothirat et al. Reference Pothirat, Tantiworawit, Chaiwarith, Jariyapan, Wannasan, Siriyasatien and Bates2014; Liautaud et al. Reference Liautaud, Vignier, Miossec, Plumelle, Kone, Delta, Ravel, Cabié and Desbois2015) and different isolates of ‘Leishmania siamensis’ in Thailand (Bualert et al. Reference Bualert, Charungkiattikul, Thongsuksai, Mungthin, Siripattanapipong, Khositnithikul and Leelayoova2012; Kanjanopas et al. Reference Kanjanopas, Siripattanapipong, Ninsaeng, Hitakarun, Jitkaew, Kaewtaphaya and Leelayoova2013; Chusri et al. Reference Chusri, Thammapalo, Silpapojakul and Siriyasatien2014), United States of America (Reuss et al. Reference Reuss, Dunbar, Calderwood Mays, Owen, Mallicote, Archer and Wellehan2012), Ghana (Kwakye-Nuako et al. Reference Kwakye-Nuako, Mosore, Duplessis, Bates, Puplampu, Mensah-Attipoe and Bates2015) and Central Europe (Muller et al. Reference Muller, Welle, Lobsiger, Stoffel, Boghenbor, Hilbe and Von Bomhard2009; Lobsiger et al. Reference Lobsiger, Muller, Schweizer, Frey, Wiederkehr, Zumkehr and Gottstein2010) (Fig. 1). Since ‘L. siamensis’ is not a taxonomically valid name, it should be used between quotation marks (Barratt et al. Reference Barratt, Kaufer, Peters, Craig, Lawrence, Roberts and Ellis2017; Cotton, Reference Cotton2017; Steverding, Reference Steverding2017). Based on the available literature, more studies are still needed to ascertain their current taxonomic status of those species/isolates using molecular approaches. This subject also opens the possibility of epidemiological studies in order to identify possible vectors and hosts.

Fig. 1. Distributions and hosts of Leishmania species from the L. (Mundinia) subgenus. Legend: CL, cutaneous leishmaniasis; VL, visceral leishmaniasis.

Histopathology, glycoconjugates and innate immunity

The first histopathological description of L. enriettii lesion was reported soon after its discovery in guinea pigs. It is characterized by highly infected macrophages bearing a chronic inflammatory infiltrate, a profile very similar to other dermotropic Leishmania species (Medina, Reference Medina2001). For this reason, L. enriettii has been successfully used as a CL model but it may vary depending on the host.

Similar to guinea pigs, hamsters may also develop and heal lesions. Nevertheless, those were not ulcerative and/or metastatic (Belehu and Turk, Reference Belehu and Turk1976). In red kangaroos, although a histopathological description was provided, it is still unknown if the lesions spontaneously healed in those hosts (Rose et al. Reference Rose, Curtis, Baldwin, Mathis, Kumar, Sakthianandeswaren, Spurck, Low Choy and Handman2004). Several studies of histopathological lesions caused by L. enriettii in guinea pigs were proposed (Paranaíba et al. Reference Paranaíba, de Assis, Nogueira, Torrecilhas, Campos, de Silveira, Martins-Filho, Pessoa, Campos, Parreiras, Melo, de Gontijo and Soares2015; Seblova et al. Reference Seblova, Sadlova, Vojtkova, Votypka, Carpenter, Bates and Volf2015). Depending on the strain, the lesions can appear between the third and sixth week and disappear between the 10th and the 14th week (Lobato Paraense, Reference Lobato Paraense1953; Bryceson et al. Reference Bryceson, Bray and Dumonde1974; Medina, Reference Medina2001). However, those papers did not use salivary gland extract (SGE) together with parasite inoculum to mimic natural transmission. Recently, two strains (L88 and Cobaia) of L. enriettii isolated in different years (1945 and 1985) exhibited different degrees of immunopathology in the guinea pigs. L88 strain was able to cause ulcerated lesions and those were exacerbated in the presence of SGE (Paranaíba et al. Reference Paranaíba, de Assis, Nogueira, Torrecilhas, Campos, de Silveira, Martins-Filho, Pessoa, Campos, Parreiras, Melo, de Gontijo and Soares2015). However, a missing step in the histopathology of L. enriettii is to compare different strains in the presence/absence of SGE.

Glycoconjugates of Leishmania are very important during the interaction of parasite and host. Lipophosphoglycan (LPG) and glycoinositolphospholipids (GIPLs) have been demonstrated to have an important role in the interaction with sand flies and the innate immune system (Assis et al. Reference Assis, Ibraim, Noronha, Turco and Soares2012; de Assis et al. Reference de Assis, Ibraim, Nogueira, Soares and Turco2012; Ibraim et al. Reference Ibraim, de Assis, Pessoa, Campos, Melo, Turco and Soares2013). The LPGs of L88 and Cobaia strains of L. enriettii were devoid of side-chains in their repeat units, similar to those found in L. braziliensis (Soares et al. Reference Soares, Cardoso, Barron, Araújo, Pimenta and Turco2005), Leishmania donovani (Sudan) (Sacks et al. Reference Sacks, Pimenta, McConville, Schneider and Turco1995), L. infantum type I (Coelho-Finamore et al. Reference Coelho-Finamore, Freitas, Assis, Melo, Novozhilova, Secundino, Pimenta, Turco and Soares2011) and Leishmania shawi (Passero et al. Reference Passero, Assis, da Silva, Nogueira, Macedo, Pessoa, Campos, Laurenti and Soares2015) (Fig. 2). Although the LPGs of both strains were similar, their GIPLs were polymorphic (Paranaíba et al. Reference Paranaíba, de Assis, Nogueira, Torrecilhas, Campos, de Silveira, Martins-Filho, Pessoa, Campos, Parreiras, Melo, de Gontijo and Soares2015). Further studies are still necessary to define the biochemical structure for L. enriettii GIPLs. Different from most Leishmania species, LPG and GIPLs from L. enriettii were very pro-inflammatory triggering the production of nitric oxide (NO) and pro-inflammatory cytokines [tumour necrosis factor (TNF)-α, interleukin (IL)-6 and IL-12p40] in murine macrophages via TLR2/TLR4. Those properties varied intraspecifically where LPGs and GIPLs of L88 strain were more pro-inflammatory than those from Cobaia strain reflecting their immunopathology properties in vivo. L88 strain was able to cause ulcerative lesions, whereas Cobaia strain only developed a protuberance (Paranaíba et al. Reference Paranaíba, de Assis, Nogueira, Torrecilhas, Campos, de Silveira, Martins-Filho, Pessoa, Campos, Parreiras, Melo, de Gontijo and Soares2015).

Fig. 2. Schematic diagram of lipophosphoglycan repeat units from L eishmania enriettii strains. The repeat units are 6-Gal(β1,4)Man(α1)-PO4.

In Table 1, it is possible to comparatively evaluate several innate immune components involved in LPG and GIPLs activation by different Leishmania species. The higher pro-inflammatory activity of L. enriettii glycoconjugates may be important not only for the severity of the lesions in guinea pigs, but also for the activation of the immune system and subsequent healing. Most of those mechanisms are still unknown probably due to the lack of studies and the low veterinary importance of those animals.

Table 1. Innate immune components involved in LPG and GIPLs activation by different Leishmania species

N.D., strain not determined.

Leishmania enriettii as a model for chemotherapeutic studies and molecular biology

Guinea pigs have the ability to spontaneously cure cutaneous lesions caused by L. enriettii. For this reason, chemotherapeutic tests with this parasite are very scarce and only few reports were available in the literature. This scenario is completely different from that of Leishmania amazonensis, another dermotropic species. This anergic species, commonly associated with treatment failure and natural drug resistance, is the most used model for in vitro chemotherapeutic studies (Rocha et al. Reference Rocha, Corrêa, Melo, Beverley, Martins-Filho, Madureira and Soares2013).

In 1961, L. enriettii-infected animals treated with Glucantime® exhibited a lesion regression. In spite of that, no effect was observed after in vivo treatment with Pentostam®, fuadin, tartar emetic and hydroxy-stilbamidine (Ercoli and Fink, Reference Ercoli and Fink1962). Further, in vivo tests in C. porcellus and in vitro studies in macrophages infected with L. enriettii did not respond to treatment with furazolidone and nitrofurazone (Neal et al. Reference Neal, van Bueren and Hooper1988). On the other hand, levamisole-treated guinea pigs developed less severe lesions and metastases (Rezai et al. Reference Rezai, Behbehani, Gettner and Ardehali1988). Aside from that, Glucantime® and Amphotericin B remain the first/second-line drugs for leishmaniasis treatment in different parts of the world. Occurrences of CL in kangaroos as an opportunistic agent (Dougall et al. Reference Dougall, Alexander, Holt, Harris, Sultan, Bates, Rose and Walton2011) highlights the importance of more studies in order to determine their role as hosts and perhaps to stimulate in vivo chemotherapeutic protocols for those and other animals.

Alike other Leishmania species, L. enriettii has been used as a model for molecular biology studies not only for developing transfection protocols but also for understanding multidrug resistance (MDR). Its LeMDR1 gene is an ABCB-type transporter having high similarity to mammalian phosphoglycan protein P and involved in vinblastine resistance (Chow et al. Reference Chow, Wong, Ullman and Wirth1993). Resistance against this drug was demonstrated by many molecular approaches suggesting that accumulation inside intracellular compartments and further exocytosis was one of the mechanisms (Dodge et al. Reference Dodge, Waller, Chow, Zaman, Cotton, McConville and Wirth2004). Later, vinblastine resistance mechanism was shown to be iron-dependent (Wong and Chow, Reference Wong and Chow2006). More recently, synthetic flavonoid dimers were tested against pentamidin and sodium stibogluconate-resistant strains of L. enriettii. Some of those compounds, known to inhibit ATP-binding cassettes transporters, were able to reverse MDR in those parasites (Wong et al. Reference Wong, Chan, Burkett, Zhao, Chai, Sun, Chan and Chow2007).

Some reports have looked at differentially expressed genes in L. enriettii in the two stages as a means to understand parasite developmental biology. During Leishmania life cycle, parasite alternates from a promastigote form in the sand fly to an amastigote form in the vertebrate host. Among several morphological changes, differentially expressed proteins are also observed such as tubulin. This protein is very important for flagellum assembly, a structure absent/unapparent in the amastigotes and their genes are tandemly arranged in the genome (Landfear et al. Reference Landfear, McMahon-Pratt and Wirth1983). Although α- and β-tubulin genes are equally arranged in both forms, their mRNA expression levels are higher in the promastigote stage (Landfear and Wirth, Reference Landfear and Wirth1985). Besides those studies on tubulins, two publications also reported on membrane glucose transporters. Glucose is a very important carbohydrate for trypanosomatids and its uptake occurs not only extracellularly, but also from the cytosol to the glycosome. They are also a family of tandem repeated genes, whose mRNAs were almost exclusively expressed in the insect's promastigotes encoding for two isoforms (iso-1 and iso-2) (Stack et al. Reference Stack, Stein and Landfear1990; Langford et al. Reference Langford, Little, Kavanaugh and Landfear1994). Later on, with the development of more advanced molecular protocols, alike other Leishmania species, L. enriettii was also used for transient and stable transfections with different genes (Laban and Wirth, Reference Laban and Wirth1989; Laban et al. Reference Laban, Tobin, Curotto de Lafaille and Wirth1990; Tobin et al. Reference Tobin, Laban and Wirth1991). Those results were published in outstanding journals and were landmarks for standardizing those protocols in other Leishmania/trypanosomatid species. Although L. enriettii was used with the model for molecular biology studies, a lot is still to be accomplished, especially regarding virulence and target genes for parasite typing.

Leishmania enriettii: the Leishmania RNA virus and extracellular vesicles

The first report of viruses or virus-like particles (VLPs) uncovered in protozoans of the sub-family Leishmaniinae (Jirků et al. Reference Jirků, Yurchenko, Lukeš and Maslov2012; Espinosa et al. Reference Espinosa, Serrano, Camargo, Teixeira and Shaw2016) have been found in the promastigotes of Leishmania hertigi species in culture. The VLPs were immediately observed in the cytoplasm of these parasites when examined by the electronic microscope, particles were spherical with 55–60 diameter (Molyneux, Reference Molyneux1974).

The Leishmania RNA virus (LRV) (Totiviridae) was reported to infect Leishmania species from subgenera Viannia (LRV1) and Leishmania (LRV2). LRV1 is a double-stranded RNA (dsRNA) virus first described in Leishmania guyanensis strains from the Amazon region (Guilbride et al. Reference Guilbride, Myler and Stuart1992). The molecular structure of the LRV2 virus is different from LRV1 (Scheffter et al. Reference Scheffter, Ro, Chung and Patterson1995). Many studies have found a correlation between LRV1 and severity of pathology, a mechanism dependent on TLR3 activation by the viral dsRNA (Ives et al. Reference Ives, Ronet, Prevel, Ruzzante, Fuertes-Marraco, Schutz, Zangger, Revaz-Breton, Lye, Hickerson, Beverley, Acha-Orbea, Launois, Fasel and Masina2011). More recently, the finding of LRV was expanded in other Latin American countries including Bolivia, Peru and French Guiana (Adaui et al. Reference Adaui, Lye, Akopyants, Zimic, Llanos-Cuentas, Garcia, Maes, De Doncker, Dobson, Arevalo, Dujardin and Beverley2016; Ginouvès et al. Reference Ginouvès, Simon, Bourreau, Lacoste, Ronet, Couppié and Nacher2016; Macedo et al. Reference Macedo, Menezes-Neto, Rugani, Silva, Melo, Lye, Beverley, Gontijo and Soares2016), confirming that biogeographically this virus seems confined to the northern regions of South America. The presence of LRV1-infected strains was already detected in a biopsy from patients with CL from Caratinga, Minas Gerais state, Brazil (Ogg et al. Reference Ogg, Carrion, de Botelho, Mayrink, Correa-Oliveira and Patterson2003). However, a presence of LVR1 in parasites isolated from patients was not detected in Minas Gerais state and other regions of Brazil, suggesting that the frequency of LRV1 in L. braziliensis strains seems to be very low in these localities (Pereira et al. Reference Pereira, Maretti-Mira, Rodrigues, Lima, de Oliveira-neto, Cupolillo, Pirmez and de Oliveira2013; Macedo et al. Reference Macedo, Menezes-Neto, Rugani, Silva, Melo, Lye, Beverley, Gontijo and Soares2016). Regarding the L. (Mundinia) subgenus, the occurrence of LRV1/2 is a promising field for future investigations.

In this context, previous studies showed that L88 strain of L. enriettii caused more severe lesion than Cobaia strain (Paranaíba et al. Reference Paranaíba, de Assis, Nogueira, Torrecilhas, Campos, de Silveira, Martins-Filho, Pessoa, Campos, Parreiras, Melo, de Gontijo and Soares2015). However, no information on LRV1/LRV2 on L. enriettii was available at that time. A capsid PCR using primers for LRV1/LRV2 (Macedo et al. Reference Macedo, Menezes-Neto, Rugani, Silva, Melo, Lye, Beverley, Gontijo and Soares2016) did not detect the virus in both L. enriettii strains (Fig. 3). Those data reinforced the role of the glycoconjugates in the severity of the pathology and perhaps are strain-specific. Those data are in accordance with previous published papers showing that LRV1 prevalence is higher in the Amazon and Northern parts of South America (Cantanhêde et al. Reference Cantanhêde, da Silva Júnior, Ito, Felipin, Nicolete, Salcedo, Porrozzi, Cupolillo and de Ferreira2015; Ito et al. Reference Ito, Catanhêde, Katsuragawa, Silva Junior, Camargo, de Mattos and Vilallobos-Salcedo2015; Adaui et al. Reference Adaui, Lye, Akopyants, Zimic, Llanos-Cuentas, Garcia, Maes, De Doncker, Dobson, Arevalo, Dujardin and Beverley2016; Ginouvès et al. Reference Ginouvès, Simon, Bourreau, Lacoste, Ronet, Couppié and Nacher2016), whereas in the Southeast its finding is rare (Pereira et al. Reference Pereira, Maretti-Mira, Rodrigues, Lima, de Oliveira-neto, Cupolillo, Pirmez and de Oliveira2013; Macedo et al. Reference Macedo, Menezes-Neto, Rugani, Silva, Melo, Lye, Beverley, Gontijo and Soares2016).

Fig. 3. LRV1/LRV2 absence in two L eishmania enriettii strains (L88 and Cobaia). Legend: M, molecular marker; C1+, LVR1-positive control (L eishmania guyanensis reference strain M4147); C−, LRV1-negative control (L eishmania braziliensis reference strain M2903); C2+, LVR2-positive control (L eishmania major reference strain ASKH); lane 1, strain L88; lane 2, strain Cobaia; NC, negative controls (capsid and β-tubulin).

Another unknown aspect of the host–parasite interaction in L. enriettii is the release of extracellular vesicles (EVs) by the parasite. The first report on EVs in Leishmania was in L. donovani (Silverman et al. Reference Silverman, Clos, Horakova, Wang, Wiesgigl, Kelly and Reiner2010). In this species, those vesicles abrogated immune response favouring parasite development by several mechanisms. A recent study has determined the role of EVs during the interaction between L. infantum and the sand fly Lutzomyia longipalpis (Atayde et al. Reference Atayde, Suau, Townsend, Hassani, Kamhawi and Olivier2015). EVs have been the focus of great interest not only in Leishmania but also in other pathogens [reviewed by (Marcilla et al. Reference Marcilla, Martin-Jaular, Trelis, De Menezes-neto, Osuna, Bernal, Fernandez-becerra, Almeida and Portillo2014; Campos et al. Reference Campos, Soares, Ribeiro, Andrade, Batista and Torrecilhas2015; Szempruch et al. Reference Szempruch, Dennison, Kieft, Harrington and Hajduk2016)]. EVs have importance not only in intercellular communication but also during the host–parasite interaction not only in Leishmania but also in other parasites (Szempruch et al. Reference Szempruch, Dennison, Kieft, Harrington and Hajduk2016). For example, Trichomonas vaginalis EVs are determinant for tissue tropism and attachment, whereas in Trypanosoma brucei they confer resistance to trypanosome lytic factors (Stephens and Hajduk, Reference Stephens and Hajduk2011; Twu et al. Reference Twu, de Miguel, Lustig, Stevens, Vashisht, Wohlschlegel and Johnson2013). In Trypanosoma cruzi, EVs were determinant during the invasion, adhesion and modulation of the immune system (Trocoli Torrecilhas et al. Reference Trocoli Torrecilhas, Tonelli, Pavanelli, da Silva, Schumacher, de Souza and Manso Alves2009; Torrecilhas et al. Reference Torrecilhas, Schumacher, Alves and Colli2012; Nogueira et al. Reference Nogueira, Ribeiro, Silveira, Campos, Martins-Filho, Bela, Campos, Pessoa, Colli, Alves, Soares and Torrecilhas2015). However, it is still unknown if these subcellular structures were present in L. enriettii strains. The basic vesiculation protocol was performed and both strains (L88 and Cobaia) shed vesicles, as demonstrated by scanning electron microscope (SEM) analysis (Fig. 4). Nanoparticle tracking analysis (NTA) quantitatively confirmed SEM studies (Fig. 5a and b). The EVs released by L88 and Cobaia strains had similar size distributions with modal sizes of 136 (±1·5) nm and 141 (±5·4) nm, respectively. After normalization by cultured parasite concentrations, a slightly higher amount of EVs was observed for the Cobaia strain. EVs from the Cobaia strain were isolated by size exclusion chromatography and fractions were analysed by NTA and dot-blot for the detection of gp63 (Fig. 5c and d). The gp63 glycoprotein is a virulence factor found in Leishmania-derived EVs resulting in some of their immunomodulatory properties (Hassani et al. Reference Hassani, Shio, Martel, Faubert and Olivier2014). Therefore, the detection of gp63 in the same fractions in which particles were detected by NTA, not only corroborates their vesicular nature but also suggests that L. enriettii EVs are likely to be involved in the immunomodulation of host cells. However, more studies are necessary to qualitatively compare the EVs contents, not only their surface antigens, but also their miRNA cargo. Those features could help to understand the differences in the immunopathology of both strains.

Fig. 4. Extracellular vesicles release by L eishmania enriettii strains (L88 and Cobaia strain). Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) of parasite membrane shedding after incubation in culture medium (a–d, bars: 3–10 µm). (a, b) L. enriettii L88 strain, (c, d) L. enriettii Cobaia strain. Magnification: (a) 26 468; (b) 50 000; (c) 15 276 and (d) 50 000.

Fig. 5. Nanoparticle tracking analysis (NTA) and dot-blot from L eishmania enriettii strains (L88 and Cobaia). (a) NTA analysis from EVs released by L88 and (b) Cobaia strains (c); size exclusion chromatoghraphy (SEC) of EVs from Cobaia strain, and (d) gp63 detection of EV-containing fractions probed with mAb anti-gp63 (1:500).

Concluding remarks

Many aspects of L. enriettii and the other newly members of the L. (Mundinia) subgenus are still unknown. This comprehensive review aimed to explore and update most of the knowledge of those protozoans. Regarding L. martiniquensis and ‘L. siamensis’, many studies are still needed to address their current taxonomical status and to determine many epidemiological aspects, such as vertebrate and invertebrate hosts. In the case of L. enriettii from Brazil, there is still a lack of information on the wild reservoir and confirmation of the sand fly vector. Finally, we preliminary demonstrated the release of EVs by L. enriettii and demonstrate the absence of LRV1 and LRV2 in those strains. Those data reinforce the need for more studies in order to understand the complexity of factors involved in the immunopathology of this species in the host–parasite interface.

Acknowledgements

Authors are from the Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG), Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP) and Centro de Pesquisas René Rachou/FIOCRUZ. They are responsible for all technological and scientific support for the development of this work.

Financial support

R.P.S. and W.L.T. are supported by Conselho Nacional de Pesquisa e Desenvolvimento (CNPq), and Fundação de Amparo a Pesquisa do Estado de Minas Gerais (305065/2016-5; APQ01378-12; PPM-00102-16). L.J.P. is supported by Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (CAPES). L.F.P. is supported by FAPEMIG. A.C.T. is supported by Fundação de Amparo a Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo (FAPESP 2016-01917-3).

Footnotes

†

These authors contributed equally to this work.

References

Adaui, V, Lye, L, Akopyants, N, Zimic, M, Llanos-Cuentas, A, Garcia, L, Maes, I, De Doncker, S, Dobson, D, Arevalo, J, Dujardin, J and Beverley, S (2016) Association of the endobiont double-stranded RNA virus LRV1 With treatment failure for human leishmaniasis caused by Leishmania braziliensis in Peru and Bolivia. The Journal of Infectious Diseases 213, 112–121.Google Scholar
Aebischer, T, Bennett, CL, Pelizzola, M, Vizzardelli, C, Pavelka, N, Urbano, M, Capozzoli, M, Luchini, A, Ilg, T, Granucci, F, Blackburn, CC, Ricciardi-castagnoli, P and Leishmania, Á (2005) A critical role for lipophosphoglycan in proinflammatory responses of dendritic cells to Leishmania mexicana. European Journal of Immunology 35, 476–486.Google Scholar
Akhoundi, M, Kuhls, K, Cannet, A, Votýpka, J and Marty, P (2016) A historical overview of the classification, evolution, and dispersion of Leishmania parasites and sandflies. PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases 10, 1–40.Google Scholar
Argueta-donohué, J, Carrillo, N, Valdés-Reyes, L, Zentella, A, Aguirre-García, M, Becker, I and Gutiérrez-kobeh, L (2008) Leishmania mexicana: participation of NF-kappaB in the differential production of IL-12 in dendritic cells and monocytes induced by lipophosphoglycan (LPG). Experimental Parasitology 120, 1–9.Google Scholar
Assis, RR, Ibraim, IC, Noronha, FS, Turco, SJ and Soares, RP (2012) Glycoinositolphospholipids from Leishmania braziliensis and L. infantum: modulation of innate immune system and variations in carbohydrate structure. PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases 6, e1543.Google Scholar
Atayde, VD, Suau, HA, Townsend, S, Hassani, K, Kamhawi, S and Olivier, M (2015) Exosome secretion by the parasitic protozoan Leishmania within the sand fly midgut. HHS Public Access 13, 957–967.Google Scholar
Australian Government (2016) Spence S. Primefact: Leishmaniasis. In Industries, DoP, editor. 1st edn. Sidney, Australia, pp. 1-3. Available at http://www.dpi.nsw.gov.au/content/biosecurity/animal/humans/leishmaniasisGoogle Scholar
Balaraman, S, Singh, VK, Tewary, P and Madhubala, R (2005) Leishmania lipophosphoglycan activates the transcription factor activating protein 1 in J774A.1 macrophages through the extracellular signal-related kinase (ERK) and p38 mitogen-activated protein kinase. Molecular and Biochemical Parasitology 139, 117–127.Google Scholar
Barratt, J, Kaufer, A, Peters, B, Craig, D, Lawrence, A, Roberts, T and Ellis, J (2017) Isolation of novel trypanosomatid, Zelonia australiensis sp. nov. (Kinetoplastida: Trypanosomatidae) provides support for a Gondwanan origin of dixenous parasitism in the Leishmaniinae. PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases 11, 1–26.Google Scholar
Becker, I, Salaiza, N, Aguirre, M, Delgado, J, Carrillo-Carrasco, N, Kobeh, LG, Ruiz, A, Cervantes, R, Torres, AP, Cabrera, N, González, A, Maldonado, C and Isibasi, A (2003) Leishmania lipophosphoglycan (LPG) activates NK cells through toll-like receptor-2. Molecular and Biochemical Parasitology 130, 65–74.Google Scholar
Belehu, A and Turk, JL (1976) Establishment of cutaneous Leishmania enriettii infection in hamsters. Infection and Immunity 13, 1235–1241.Google Scholar
Boisseau-Garsaud, AM, Cales-Quist, D, Desbois, N, Jouannelle, J, Jouannelle, A, Pratlong, F and Dedet, JP (2000) A new case of cutaneous infection by a presumed monoxenous trypanosomatid in the island of Martinique (French West Indies). Transactions of the Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene 94, 51–52.Google Scholar
Bryceson, AD, Bray, RS and Dumonde, DC (1974) Experimental cutaneous leishmaniasis. IV. Selective suppression of cell-mediated immunity during the response of Guinea-pigs to infection with Leishmania enriettii. Clinical Experimental Immunology 16, 189–202.Google Scholar
Bualert, L, Charungkiattikul, W, Thongsuksai, P, Mungthin, M, Siripattanapipong, S, Khositnithikul, R and Leelayoova, S (2012) Case report: autochthonous disseminated dermal and visceral leishmaniasis in an AIDS patient, Southern Thailand, caused by Leishmania siamensis. American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene 86, 821–824.Google Scholar
Campos, JH, Soares, RP, Ribeiro, K, Andrade, AC, Batista, WL and Torrecilhas, AC (2015) Extracellular vesicles: role in inflammatory responses and potential uses in vaccination in cancer and infectious diseases. Journal of Immunology Research 2015, 1–14.Google Scholar
Cantanhêde, L, da Silva Júnior, C, Ito, M, Felipin, K, Nicolete, R, Salcedo, J, Porrozzi, R, Cupolillo, E and de Ferreira, RG (2015) Further evidence of an association between the presence of Leishmania RNA virus 1 and the mucosal manifestations in tegumentary leishmaniasis patients. PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases 15, 1–11.Google Scholar
Chow, LM, Wong, AK, Ullman, B and Wirth, DF (1993) Cloning and functional analysis of an extrachromosomally amplified multidrug resistance-like gene in Leishmania enriettii. Molecular and Biochemical Parasitology 60, 195–208.Google Scholar
Chusri, S, Thammapalo, S, Silpapojakul, K and Siriyasatien, P (2014) Animal reservoirs and potential vectors of Leishmania siamensis in southern Thailand. The Southeast Asian Journal of Tropical Medicine and Public Health 45, 13–19.Google Scholar
Coelho-Finamore, JM, Freitas, VC, Assis, RR, Melo, MN, Novozhilova, N, Secundino, NF, Pimenta, PF, Turco, SJ and Soares, RP (2011) Leishmania infantum: lipophosphoglycan intraspecific variation and interaction with vertebrate and invertebrate hosts. International Journal for Parasitology 41, 333–342.Google Scholar
Cotton, JA (2017) The expanding world of human leishmaniasis. Trends in Parasitology 33, 341–344.Google Scholar
de Assis, RR, Ibraim, IC, Nogueira, PM, Soares, RP and Turco, SJ (2012) Glycoconjugates in New world species of Leishmania: polymorphisms in lipophosphoglycan and glycoinositolphospholipids and interaction with hosts. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta 1820, 1354–1365.Google Scholar
de Guerra, JAO, das Barbosa, MGV, de Loureiro, ACSP, Coelho, CP, Rosa, GG and de Coelho, LIACR (2007) Leishmaniose tegumentar americana em crianças: aspectos epidemiológicos de casos atendidos em Manaus, Amazonas, Brasil. Cadernos de Saúde Pública 23, 2215–2223.Google Scholar
de Veer, MJ, Curtis, JM, Baldwin, TM, DiDonato, JA, Sexton, A, McConville, MJ, Handman, E and Schofield, L (2003) Myd88 is essential for clearance of Leishmania major: possible role for lipophosphoglycan and toll-like receptor 2 signaling. European Journal of Immunology 33, 2822–2831.Google Scholar
Desbois, N, Pratlong, F, Quist, D and Dedet, J-P (2014) Leishmania (Leishmania) martiniquensis n. sp. (Kinetoplastida: Trypanosomatidae), description of the parasite responsible for cutaneous leishmaniasis in Martinique Island (French West Indies). Parasite 21, 1–4.Google Scholar
Dodge, MA, Waller, RF, Chow, LMC, Zaman, MM, Cotton, LM, McConville, MJ and Wirth, DF (2004) Localization and activity of multidrug resistance protein 1 in the secretory pathway of Leishmania parasites. Molecular Microbiology 51, 1563–1575.Google Scholar
Dougall, A, Shilton, C, Low Choy, J, Alexander, B and Walton, S (2009) New reports of Australian cutaneous leishmaniasis in Northern Australian macropods. Epidemiology and Infection 137, 1516–1520.Google Scholar
Dougall, AM, Alexander, B, Holt, DC, Harris, T, Sultan, AH, Bates, PA, Rose, K and Walton, SF (2011) Evidence incriminating midges (Diptera: Ceratopogonidae) as potential vectors of Leishmania in Australia. International Journal for Parasitology 41, 571–579.Google Scholar
Ercoli, N and Fink, R (1962) Chemotherapy of experimental Leishmania enriettii infection. Experimental Biology and Medicine 27231, 445–448.Google Scholar
Espinosa, OA, Serrano, MG, Camargo, EP, Teixeira, MMG and Shaw, JJ (2016) An appraisal of the taxonomy and nomenclature of trypanosomatids presently classified as Leishmania and Endotrypanum. Parasitology 15, 1–13.Google Scholar
Ginouvès, M, Simon, S, Bourreau, E, Lacoste, V, Ronet, C, Couppié, P and Nacher, M (2016) Prevalence and distribution of Leishmania RNA virus 1 in Leishmania parasites from French Guiana. The American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene 94, 102–106.Google Scholar
Grimaldi, G, Tesh, RB and McMahon-Pratt, D (1989) A review of the geographic distribution and epidemiology of leishmaniasis in the New World. The American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene 41, 687–725.Google Scholar
Guilbride, L, Myler, PJ and Stuart, KD (1992) Distribution and sequence divergence of LRV1 viruses among different Leishmania species. Molecular and Biochemical Parasitology 54, 101–104.Google Scholar
Hassani, K, Shio, MT, Martel, C, Faubert, D and Olivier, M (2014) Absence of metalloprotease GP63 alters the protein content of Leishmania exosomes. PLoS ONE 9, 1–14.Google Scholar
Ibraim, IC, de Assis, RR, Pessoa, NL, Campos, MA, Melo, MN, Turco, SJ and Soares, RP (2013) Two biochemically distinct lipophosphoglycans from Leishmania braziliensis and Leishmania infantum trigger different innate immune responses in murine macrophages. Parasites & Vectors 6, 1–11.Google Scholar
Ito, M, Catanhêde, L, Katsuragawa, T, Silva Junior, C, Camargo, L, de Mattos, RG and Vilallobos-Salcedo, J (2015) Correlation between presence of Leishmania RNA virus 1 and clinical characteristics of nasal mucosal. Brazilian Journal of Otorhinolaryngology 81, 533–540.Google Scholar
Ives, A, Ronet, C, Prevel, F, Ruzzante, G, Fuertes-Marraco, S, Schutz, F, Zangger, H, Revaz-Breton, M, Lye, L-F, Hickerson, SM, Beverley, SM, Acha-Orbea, H, Launois, P, Fasel, N and Masina, S (2011) Leishmania RNA virus controls the severity of mucocutaneous leishmaniasis. Science 331, 775–778.Google Scholar
Jirků, M, Yurchenko, VY, Lukeš, J and Maslov, DA (2012) New species of insect trypanosomatids from Costa Rica and the proposal for a new subfamily within the Trypanosomatidae. The Journal of Eukaryotic Microbiology 59, 537–547.Google Scholar
Kanjanopas, K, Siripattanapipong, S, Ninsaeng, U, Hitakarun, A, Jitkaew, S, Kaewtaphaya, P and Leelayoova, S (2013) Sergentomyia (Neophlebotomus) gemmea, a potential vector of Leishmania siamensis in southern Thailand. BMC Infectious Diseases 13, 1–4.Google Scholar
Kwakye-Nuako, G, Mosore, MT, Duplessis, C, Bates, MD, Puplampu, N, Mensah-Attipoe, I and Bates, PA (2015) First isolation of a new species of Leishmania responsible for human cutaneous leishmaniasis in Ghana and classification in the Leishmania enriettii complex. International Journal for Parasitology 45, 679–684.Google Scholar
Laban, A and Wirth, DF (1989) Transfection of Leishmania enriettii and expression of chloramphenicol acetyltransferase gene. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA 86, 9119–9123.Google Scholar
Laban, A, Tobin, J, Curotto de Lafaille, M and Wirth, D (1990) Stable expression of the bacterial neor gene in Leishmania enriettii. Nature 343, 572–574.Google Scholar
Lainson, R (1997) On Leishmania enriettii and other enigmatic Leishmania species of the neotropics. Memórias do Instituto Oswaldo Cruz 92, 377–387.Google Scholar
Landfear, SM and Wirth, DF (1985) Structure of mRNA encoded by tubulin genes in Leishmania enriettii. Molecular and Biochemical Parasitology 15, 61–82.Google Scholar
Landfear, SM, McMahon-Pratt, D and Wirth, DF (1983) Tandem arrangement of tubulin genes in the protozoan parasite Leishmania enriettii. Molecular and Cellular Biology 3, 1070–1076.Google Scholar
Langford, CK, Little, BM, Kavanaugh, MP and Landfear, SM (1994) Functional expression of two glucose transporter isoforms from the parasitic protozoan Leishmania enriettii. Journal of Biological Chemistry 269, 17939–17943.Google Scholar
Liautaud, B, Vignier, N, Miossec, C, Plumelle, Y, Kone, M, Delta, D, Ravel, C, Cabié, A and Desbois, N (2015) First case of visceral leishmaniasis caused by Leishmania martiniquensis. American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene 92, 317–319.Google Scholar
Lobato Paraense, W (1953) The spread of Leishmania enriettii through the body of the guinea pig. Transactions of the Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene 47, 556–560.Google Scholar
Lobsiger, L, Muller, N, Schweizer, T, Frey, CF, Wiederkehr, D, Zumkehr, B and Gottstein, B (2010) An autochthonous case of cutaneous bovine leishmaniasis in Switzerland. Veterinary Parasitology 169, 408–414.Google Scholar
Macedo, DH, Menezes-Neto, A, Rugani, JM, Silva, SO, Melo, MN, Lye, L, Beverley, SM, Gontijo, CM and Soares, RP (2016) Typical and atypical lesions in the State of Minas Gerais, Brazil. Molecular & Biochemical Parasitology 210, 50–54.Google Scholar
Machado, MI, Milder, RV, Pacheco, RS, Silva, M, Braga, RR and Lainson, R (1994) Naturally acquired infections with Leishmania enriettii Muniz and Medina 1948 in guinea-pigs from São Paulo, Brazil. Parasitology 109, 135–138.Google Scholar
Marcilla, A, Martin-Jaular, L, Trelis, M, De Menezes-neto, A, Osuna, A, Bernal, D, Fernandez-becerra, C, Almeida, IC and Portillo, HA (2014) Extracellular vesicles in parasitic diseases. Journal of Extracellular Vesicles 1, 1–15.Google Scholar
Medina, H (2001) Estudos sobre leishmaniose: I. Primeiros casos de Leishmaniose Espontânea observados em cobáios. Brazilian Archives of Biology and Technology 1, 13–55.Google Scholar
Molyneux, DH (1974) Virus-like particles in Leishmania parasites. Nature 249, 588–589.Google Scholar
Muller, N, Welle, M, Lobsiger, L, Stoffel, MH, Boghenbor, KK, Hilbe, M and Von Bomhard, W (2009) Occurrence of Leishmania sp. in cutaneous lesions of horses in Central Europe. Veterinary Parasitology 166, 346–351.Google Scholar
Muniz, J and Medina, H (1948) Cutaneous leishmaniasis of the guinea pig, Leishmania enriettii n. sp. Hospital Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, 33, 7–25.Google Scholar
Neal, RA, van Bueren, J and Hooper, G (1988) The activity of nitrofurazone and furazolidone against Leishmania donovani, L. major and L. enriettii in vitro and in vivo. Annals of Tropical Medicine and Parasitology 82, 453–456.Google Scholar
Nogueira, PM, Ribeiro, K, Silveira, ACO, Campos, JH, Martins-Filho, OA, Bela, SR, Campos, MA, Pessoa, NL, Colli, W, Alves, MJM, Soares, RP and Torrecilhas, AC (2015) Vesicles from different Trypanosoma cruzi strains trigger differential innate and chronic immune responses. Journal of Extracellular Vesicles 4, 1–16.Google Scholar
Nogueira, PM, Assis, RR, Torrecilhas, AC, Saraiva, EM, Pessoa, NL, Campos, MA, Marialva, EF, Ríos-Velasquez, CM, Pessoa, FA, Secundino, NF, Rugani, JN, Nieves, E, Turco, SJ, Melo, MN and Soares, RP (2016) Lipophosphoglycans from Leishmania amazonensis strains display immunomodulatory properties via TLR4 and do not affect sand fly infection. PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases 10, 1–17.Google Scholar
Ogg, MM, Carrion, R, de Botelho, ACC, Mayrink, W, Correa-Oliveira, R and Patterson, JL (2003) Short report: quantification of Leishmania virus RNA in clinical samples and its possible role in pathogenesis. The American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene 69, 309–313.Google Scholar
Paranaíba, LF, de Assis, RR, Nogueira, PM, Torrecilhas, AC, Campos, JH, de Silveira, ACO, Martins-Filho, OA, Pessoa, NL, Campos, MA, Parreiras, PM, Melo, MN, de Gontijo, NF and Soares, RPP (2015) Leishmania enriettii: biochemical characterisation of lipophosphoglycans (LPGs) and glycoinositolphospholipids (GIPLs) and infectivity to Cavia porcellus. Parasites & Vectors 8, 1–14.Google Scholar
Paranaíba, LF, Pinheiro, LJ, Torrecilhas, AC, Macedo, DH, Menezes-Neto, A, Tafuri, WL and Soares, RP (2017) Leishmania enriettii, Muniz & Medina, 1948 a highly diverse parasite is here to stay. PLoS Pathogens 13, 1–5.Google Scholar
Passero, LFD, Assis, RR, da Silva, TNF, Nogueira, PM, Macedo, DH, Pessoa, NL, Campos, MA, Laurenti, MD and Soares, RP (2015) Differential modulation of macrophage response elicited by glycoinositolphospholipids and lipophosphoglycan from Leishmania (Viannia) shawi. Parasitology International 64, 32–35.Google Scholar
Pereira, LDOR, Maretti-Mira, AC, Rodrigues, KM, Lima, RB, de Oliveira-neto, MP, Cupolillo, E, Pirmez, C and de Oliveira, MP (2013) Severity of tegumentary leishmaniasis is not exclusively associated with Leishmania RNA virus 1 infection in Brazil. Memórias do Instituto Oswaldo Cruz 108, 665–667.Google Scholar
Pereira, RMS, Luiza, K, Teixeira, D, Barreto-de-souza, V, Calegari-Silva, TC, De-Melo, LDB, Soares, DC, Bou-habib, DC, Silva, M and Saraiva, EM (2010) Novel role for the double-stranded RNA-activated protein kinase PKR: modulation of macrophage infection by the protozoan parasite Leishmania. FASEB Journal 24, 617–626.Google Scholar
Pothirat, T, Tantiworawit, A, Chaiwarith, R, Jariyapan, N, Wannasan, A, Siriyasatien, P and Bates, PA (2014) First isolation of Leishmania from Northern Thailand: case report, identification as Leishmania martiniquensis and phylogenetic position within the Leishmania enriettii complex. PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases 8, 1–8.Google Scholar
Privé, C and Descoteaux, A (2000) A Leishmania donovani promastigotes evade the activation of mitogen-activated protein kinases p38, c-Jun N-terminal kinase, and extracellular signal-regulated kinase-1/2 during infection of naive macrophages. European Journal of Immunology 30, 2235–2244.Google Scholar
Proudfoot, L, Donnell, CAO and Liew, F (1995) Glycoinositolphospholipids of Leishmania major inhibit nitric oxide synthesis and reduce leishmanicidal activity in murine macrophages. European Journal of Immunology 25, 745–750.Google Scholar
Reuss, SM, Dunbar, MD, Calderwood Mays, MB, Owen, JL, Mallicote, MF, Archer, LL and Wellehan, JFX (2012) Autochthonous Leishmania siamensis in horse, Florida, USA. Emerging Infectious Diseases 18, 1545–1547.Google Scholar
Rezai, HR, Behbehani, AB, Gettner, S and Ardehali, S (1988) Effect of levamisole on the course of experimental leishmaniasis in guinea-pigs and mice: haematological and immunological findings. Annals of Tropical Medicine and Parasitology 82, 243–249.Google Scholar
Rocha, MN, Corrêa, CM, Melo, MN, Beverley, SM, Martins-Filho, OA, Madureira, AP and Soares, RP (2013) An alternative in vitro drug screening test using Leishmania amazonensis transfected with red fluorescent protein. Diagnostic Microbiology and Infectious Disease 75, 282–291.Google Scholar
Rose, K, Curtis, J, Baldwin, T, Mathis, A, Kumar, B, Sakthianandeswaren, A, Spurck, T, Low Choy, J and Handman, E (2004) Cutaneous leishmaniasis in red kangaroos: isolation and characterisation of the causative organisms. International Journal for Parasitology 34, 655–664.Google Scholar
Sacks, DL, Pimenta, PF, McConville, MJ, Schneider, P and Turco, SJ (1995) Stage-specific binding of Leishmania donovani to the sand fly vector midgut is regulated by conformational changes in the abundant surface lipophosphoglycan. The Journal of Experimental Medicine 181, 685–697.Google Scholar
Scheffter, SM, Ro, YT, Chung, IK and Patterson, JL (1995) The complete sequence of Leishmania RNA virus LRV2-1, a virus of an Old World parasite strain. Virology 212, 84–90.Google Scholar
Seblova, V, Sadlova, J, Vojtkova, B, Votypka, J, Carpenter, S, Bates, PA and Volf, P (2015) The biting midge Culicoides sonorensis (Diptera: Ceratopogonidae) is capable of developing late stage infections of Leishmania enriettii. PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases 9, 1–15.Google Scholar
Silverman, JM, Clos, J, Horakova, E, Wang, AY, Wiesgigl, M, Kelly, I and Reiner, NE (2010) Leishmania exosomes modulate innate and adaptive immune responses through effects on monocytes and dendritic cells. The Journal of Immunology 185, 5011–5022.Google Scholar
Soares, RPP, Cardoso, TL, Barron, T, Araújo, MSS, Pimenta, PFP and Turco, SJ (2005) Leishmania braziliensis: a novel mechanism in the lipophosphoglycan regulation during metacyclogenesis. International Journal for Parasitology 35, 245–253.Google Scholar
Stack, SP, Stein, DA and Landfear, SM (1990) Structural isoforms of a membrane transport protein from Leishmania enriettii. Molecular and Cellular Biology 10, 6785–6790.Google Scholar
Stephens, NA and Hajduk, SL (2011) Endosomal localization of the serum resistance-associated protein in African trypanosomes confers human infectivity. Eukaryotic Cell 10, 1023–1033.Google Scholar
Steverding, D (2017) The history of leishmaniasis. Parasites & Vectors 10, 1–10.Google Scholar
Szempruch, AJ, Dennison, L, Kieft, R, Harrington, JM and Hajduk, SL (2016) Parasites. Nature Publishing Group 14, 669–675.Google Scholar
Tobin, JF, Laban, A and Wirth, DF (1991) Homologous recombination in Leishmania enriettii. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA 88, 864–868.Google Scholar
Torrecilhas, AC, Schumacher, RI, Alves, MJM and Colli, W (2012) Vesicles as carriers of virulence factors in parasitic protozoan diseases. Microbes and Infection 14, 1465–1474.Google Scholar
Trocoli Torrecilhas, AC, Tonelli, RR, Pavanelli, WR, da Silva, JS, Schumacher, RI, de Souza, W and Manso Alves, MJ (2009) Trypanosoma cruzi: parasite shed vesicles increase heart parasitism and generate an intense inflammatory response. Microbes and Infection 11, 29–39.Google Scholar
Twu, O, de Miguel, N, Lustig, G, Stevens, GC, Vashisht, AA, Wohlschlegel, JA and Johnson, PJ (2013) Trichomonas vaginalis exosomes deliver cargo to host cells and mediate host:parasite interactions. PLoS Pathogens 9, e1003482.Google Scholar
Villaseñor-Cardoso, M, Salaiza, N, Delgado, J, Gutiérrez-Kobeh, L, Pérez-Torres, A and Becker, I (2008) Mast cells are activated by Leishmania mexicana LPG and regulate the disease outcome depending on the genetic background of the host. Parasite Immunology 3, 425–434.Google Scholar
Vivarini, DC, de Meirelles, R, Pereira, S, Luiza, K, Teixeira, D, Calegari-silva, TC, Bellio, M, Laurenti, MD, Eduardo, C, Corbett, P, Gomes, DC, Soares, RP, Silva, M, Silveira, FT and Lopes, UG (2011) Human cutaneous leishmaniasis: interferon-dependent expression of double-stranded RNA-dependent protein kinase (PKR) via TLR2. FASEB Journal 25, 4162–4173.Google Scholar
Wong, ILK and Chow, LMC (2006) The role of Leishmania enriettii multidrug resistance protein 1 (LeMDR1) in mediating drug resistance is iron-dependent. Molecular and Biochemical Parasitology 150, 278–287.Google Scholar
Wong, ILK, Chan, K-F, Burkett, BA, Zhao, Y, Chai, Y, Sun, H, Chan, TH and Chow, LMC (2007) Flavonoid dimers as bivalent modulators for pentamidine and sodium stiboglucanate resistance in Leishmania. Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy 51, 930–940.Google Scholar
Young, DG and Duncan, MA (1994) Guide to the Identification and Geographic Distribution of Lutzomyia Sand Flies in Mexico, the West Indies, Central and South America (Diptera: Psychodidae), 54th edn., Associated Publishers, American Entomological Institute, Gainesville.Google Scholar
Figure 0

Fig. 1. Distributions and hosts of Leishmania species from the L. (Mundinia) subgenus. Legend: CL, cutaneous leishmaniasis; VL, visceral leishmaniasis.

Figure 1

Fig. 2. Schematic diagram of lipophosphoglycan repeat units from Leishmania enriettii strains. The repeat units are 6-Gal(β1,4)Man(α1)-PO4.

Figure 2

Table 1. Innate immune components involved in LPG and GIPLs activation by different Leishmania species

Figure 3

Fig. 3. LRV1/LRV2 absence in two Leishmania enriettii strains (L88 and Cobaia). Legend: M, molecular marker; C1+, LVR1-positive control (Leishmania guyanensis reference strain M4147); C−, LRV1-negative control (Leishmania braziliensis reference strain M2903); C2+, LVR2-positive control (Leishmania major reference strain ASKH); lane 1, strain L88; lane 2, strain Cobaia; NC, negative controls (capsid and β-tubulin).

Figure 4

Fig. 4. Extracellular vesicles release by Leishmania enriettii strains (L88 and Cobaia strain). Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) of parasite membrane shedding after incubation in culture medium (a–d, bars: 3–10 µm). (a, b) L. enriettii L88 strain, (c, d) L. enriettii Cobaia strain. Magnification: (a) 26 468; (b) 50 000; (c) 15 276 and (d) 50 000.

Figure 5

Fig. 5. Nanoparticle tracking analysis (NTA) and dot-blot from Leishmania enriettii strains (L88 and Cobaia). (a) NTA analysis from EVs released by L88 and (b) Cobaia strains (c); size exclusion chromatoghraphy (SEC) of EVs from Cobaia strain, and (d) gp63 detection of EV-containing fractions probed with mAb anti-gp63 (1:500).