Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-d8cs5 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-07T04:45:48.975Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Almost Isoperimetric Subsets of the Discrete Cube

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 February 2011

DAVID ELLIS
DAVID ELLIS*
Affiliation:
St John's College, Cambridge, UK (e-mail: dce27@cam.ac.uk)
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

We show that a set A ⊂ {0, 1}n with edge-boundary of size at most can be made into a subcube by at most (2ε/log2(1/ε))|A| additions and deletions, provided ε is less than an absolute constant.

We deduce that if A ⊂ {0, 1}n has size 2t for some t ∈ ℕ, and cannot be made into a subcube by fewer than δ|A| additions and deletions, then its edge-boundary has size at least provided δ is less than an absolute constant. This is sharp whenever δ = 1/2j for some j ∈ {1, 2, . . ., t}.

Type
Paper
Information
Combinatorics, Probability and Computing , Volume 20 , Issue 3 , May 2011 , pp. 363 - 380
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2011

References

[1]Ben-Or, M. and Linial, N. (1985) Collective coin flipping, robust voting games, and minima of Banzhaf value. In Proc. 26th IEEE Symposium on the Foundations of Computer Science, pp. 408–416.Google Scholar
[2]Bernstein, A. J. (1967) Maximally connected arrays on the n-cube. SIAM J. Appl. Math. 15 1485–1489.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[3]Falik, D. and Samorodnitsky, A. (2007) Edge-isoperimetric inequalities and influences. Combin. Probab. Comput. 16 693–712.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[4]Friedgut, E. (1998) Boolean functions with low average sensitivity depend on few coordinates. Combinatorica 18 27–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[5]Friedgut, E., Kalai, G. and Naor, A. (2002) Boolean functions whose Fourier transform is concentrated on the first two levels. Adv. Appl. Math. 29 427–437.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[6]Harper, L. H. (1964) Optimal assignments of numbers to vertices. SIAM J. Appl. Math. 12 131–135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[7]Hart, S. (1976) A note on the edges of the n-cube. Discrete Math. 14 157–163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[8]Kahn, J. and Kalai, G. (2007) Thresholds and expectation thresholds. Combin. Probab. Comput. 16 495–502.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[9]Kahn, J., Kalai, G. and Linial, N. (1988) The influence of variables on boolean functions. In FOCS 1988, pp. 68–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[10]Keevash, P. (2008) Shadows and intersections: Stability and new proofs. Adv. Math. 218 1685–1703.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[11]Leader, I. Personal communication.Google Scholar
[12]Lindsey, J. H. II (1964) Assignment of numbers to vertices. Amer. Math. Monthly 71 508–516.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[13]Rossignol, R. (2005) Threshold for monotone symmetric properties through a logarithmic Sobolev inequality. Ann. Probab. 34 1707–1725.Google Scholar
[14]Samorodnitsky, A. (2009) Edge isoperimetric inequalities in the Hamming cube. Talk given at the IPAM Long Program in Combinatorics, Workshop IV: Analytical Methods in Combinatorics, Additive Number Theory and Computer Science, November 2009.Google Scholar
[15]Samorodnitsky, A. Personal communication.Google Scholar
[16]Talagrand, M. (1994) On Russo's approximate 0–1 law. Ann. Probab. 22 1576–1587.CrossRefGoogle Scholar