In the original publication of Klašnja et al. (2021), the authors miscoded the gender of the candidates in the conjoint experiment. As a result, the gender effect reported in Figure 1 was inverted, but none of the results discussed in the article were affected. The corrected Figure 1 is provided below:
![](https://static.cambridge.org/binary/version/id/urn:cambridge.org:id:binary:20210701075639984-0988:S2052263021000130:S2052263021000130_fig1.png?pub-status=live)
Figure 1 Conjoint experiment results.
Values represent the difference in respondents’ propensity for supporting a hypothetical candidate based on each vignette characteristic. Lines represent 95% confidence intervals estimated using standard errors clustered by respondent. Estimates are based on OLS regressions.
The authors are grateful to Carmen Le Foulon and Catherine Reyes-Housholder for bringing this coding error to their attention.