No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Mapping collective behavior – beware of looping
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 26 February 2014
Abstract
We discuss ambiguities of the two main dimensions of the map proposed by Bentley and colleagues that relate to the degree of self-reflection the observed agents have upon their behavior. This self-reflection is a variant of the “looping effect” which denotes that, in social research, the product of investigation influences the object of investigation. We outline how this can be understood as a dimension of “height” in the map of Bentley et al.
- Type
- Open Peer Commentary
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2014
References
Christen, M., Alfano, M., Bangerter, B. & Lapsley, D. (2013) Ethical issues of morality mining: When the moral identity of individuals becomes a focus of data mining. In: Ethical data mining applications for socio-economic development, ed. Rahman, H. & Ramos, I., pp. 1–21. IGI Global.Google Scholar
Hacking, I. (1992) Multiple personality disorders and its hosts. History of the Human Sciences
5(2):3–31.Google Scholar
Hacking, I. (1995) The looping effect of human kinds. In: Causal cognition: A multidisciplinary debate, ed. Sperber, D., Premack, D. & Premack, A. J., pp. 351–83. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Target article
Mapping collective behavior – beware of looping
Related commentaries (1)
Mapping collective behavior in the big-data era