Hostname: page-component-6dbcb7884d-xl9kw Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-13T20:51:09.277Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Why the use of ideographic codes does not improve communicative skills in patients with severe aphasia?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 October 2023

Guido Gainotti Open the ORCID record for Guido Gainotti [Opens in a new window]
Guido Gainotti*
Affiliation:
Institute of Neurology, Catholic University of the Sacred Heart, Roma, Italy guido.gainotti@unicatt.it; WWW.Unicatt.it
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In his target article, Morin claims that ideographic codes are exceedingly difficult to use. In my commentary I will show that the use of Bliss symbols does not improve the communicative abilities of aphasic patients with severe language disorders. This failure to remediate communication disorders may result from disruption of inner language allowing to translate ideographic codes into spoken language.

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Information
Behavioral and Brain Sciences , Volume 46 , 2023 , e242
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2023. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Baldo, J. V., Paulraj, S. R., Curran, B. C., & Dronkers, N. F. (2015). Impaired reasoning and problem-solving in individuals with language impairment due to aphasia or language delay. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, 1523. https://doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01523CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Barsalou, L. W. (2008). Grounded cognition. Annual Review of Psychology, 59, 617–645. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.59CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Funnell, E., & Allport, A. (1989). Symbolically speaking: Communicating with Blissymbols in aphasia. Aphasiology, 3, 279–300. doi:10.1080/02687038908248995CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gainotti, G. (2021). Is there a causal link between the left lateralization of language and other brain asymmetries? A review of data gathered in patients with focal brain lesions. Brain Sciences, 11, 1644. doi: doi.org/10.3390/brainsci11121644CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Glass, A. V., Gazzaniga, M. S., & Premack, D. (1973). Artificial language training in global aphasics. Neuropsychologia, 11, 95–110. doi:10.1016/0028-3932(73)90069-9CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Head, H. (1926). Aphasia and kindred disorders of speech. Macmillan.Google Scholar
Johannsen-Hornbach, H., Cegla, B., Mager, U., & Schempp, B. (1985). Treatment of chronic global aphasia with a nonverbal communication system. Brain and Language, 24, 74–82. doi:10.1016/0093-934x(85)90098-7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCall, D., Shelton, J. R., Weinrich, M., & Cox, D. (2000). The utility of computerized visual communication for improving natural language in chronic global aphasia: Implications for approaches to treatment in global aphasia, Aphasiology, 14(8), 795–826. doi:10.1080/026870300412214CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Perrone-Bertolotti, M., Kujala, J., Vidal, J. R., Hamame, C. M., Ossandon, T., Bertrand, O., … Lachaux, J. P. (2012). How silent is silent reading? Intracerebral evidence for top-down activation of temporal voice areas during reading. Journal of Neuroscience, 32(49), 17554–17562. doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2982-12.2012CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed