Introduction
Equine piroplasmosis (EP) is a disease of equids caused by at least two haemoparasites, Babesia caballi and Theileria equi transmitted by Ixodid ticks. Clinical manifestations of the disease in infected animals include lethargy, anorexia, fever, jaundice, haemolysis and petechia haemorrhages in mucous membranes (Scoles and Ueti, Reference Scoles and Ueti2015).
EP is responsible for economic losses in the equid industry. Babesia caballi and T. equi are in the group of apicomplexan parasites collectively called piroplasms (Levine, Reference Levine and Soulsby1985). Babesia caballi lack a pre-erythrocytic cycle and T. equi have no documented transovarial transmission (Homer et al., Reference Homer, Aguilar-Delfin, Telford, Krause and Persing2000). Babesia caballi is considered less virulent than T. equi because the latter acute phase infects leucocytes before erythrocytes and the infection is long-lasting (Ramsay et al., Reference Ramsay, Ueti, Johnson, Scoles, Knowles and Mealey2013). Surviving animals remain chronic carriers with low levels of parasitaemia and serve as reservoirs for ticks (Wise et al., Reference Wise, Kappmeyer, Mealey and Knowles2013; Scoles and Ueti, Reference Scoles and Ueti2015).
EP is widespread in subtropical and tropical regions of the world (Uilenberg, Reference Uilenberg2006). It is endemic in several parts of Africa, Asia, America and Europe where competent tick vectors are present (Rothschild, Reference Rothschild2013; Onyiche et al., Reference Onyiche, Suganuma, Igarashi, Yokoyama, Xuan and Thekisoe2019). International movement of chronically infected animals has played some role in the epidemiology of this disease necessitating proper screening of animals prior to movement (Ayala-Valdovinos et al., Reference Ayala-Valdovinos, Lemus-Flores, Galindo-García, Sánchez-Chipres, Duifhuis-Rivera, Anguiano-Estrella, Bañuelos-Pineda and Rodríguez-Carpena2014).
Due to non-specific clinical signs associated with EP, diagnosis is often challenging. Furthermore, the sensitivity of different diagnostic tests such as microscopy, serology and PCR is another issue in diagnosis (Mans et al., Reference Mans, Pienaar and Latif2015). These issues have led to many different types of epidemiological prevalence studies from different areas. This is also complicated by several factors such as presence and abundance of competent vectors, management practices, host activity and effectiveness of control programmes for ticks (reviewed by Onyiche et al., Reference Onyiche, Suganuma, Igarashi, Yokoyama, Xuan and Thekisoe2019).
To date, there has been no systematic review to ascertain the current global status of EP. Therefore, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to determine the global exposure and evaluated risk factors potentially associated with their occurrence.
Materials and methods
Search strategy and selection criteria
The study was carried out in accordance with the methodology recommended by the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) (Fig. 1) (Moher et al., Reference Moher, Shamseer, Clarke, Ghersi, Liberati, Petticrew and Stewart2015). We searched the primary literature of published articles from 1 January 1990 to 25 February 2019 in English databases of Scopus, Science Direct, PubMed, Web of Science, Embase and Springer link. Keywords used for the systemic search were ‘Equine Piroplasmosis’, ‘Prevalence’, ‘Seroprevalence’ ‘Babesia caballi’, ‘Theileria equi’, ‘Tick-borne’, ‘Equids’, ‘Horses’, ‘Donkeys’, ‘Equines’ and ‘Mules’. Keywords were used individually and in combination with ‘OR’ and/or ‘AND’ operators. The titles of the articles were scanned, and relevant articles were downloaded. In addition, the reference list of the searched articles was also screened for relevant studies.
Fig. 1. Flow diagram showing the selection process of eligible studies according to the PRISMA guidelines.
Inclusion and exclusion criteria
After a review of titles and abstracts, the selected studies were screened further by a detailed review of the full text. Articles that were included in the study had to fulfil all the following criteria: (1) original research articles without geographical limitation (global); (2) the full texts were available; (3) the publication was in English; (4) conducted between 1 January 1990 and 25 February 2019; (5) study design was cross-sectional/prevalence study; (6) the diagnostic method was clearly stated; (7) the geographical location of the study was clearly stated; (8) the species of equid was clearly stated; (9) the number of positive cases and sample size were provided; (10) the species of the piroplasms was clearly identified; (11) the study screened for both B. caballi and T. equi; and (12) the sample size was at least a minimum of 50 equids. Any study that did not fulfil the criteria stated was excluded. Eligibility and inclusion as well as data extraction were carried out by two trained investigators working independently. At the end of the search and screening, the investigators met and compared findings. No attempt was made to contact the authors of the original manuscripts for any additional information or retrieval of unpublished studies.
Subgroup analyses
We performed several subgroup analyses to study the independent effects of infection of B. caballi and T. equi on several risk factors including age, sex, publication years, diagnostic methods, species of equid and continent and/or region. In the estimation of the overall pooled prevalence, we used the individual infection rates reported for all the eligible studies that were arrived at using either microscopy, molecular or serological technique. Where more than one technique was used, we used the data for serological technique (IFAT/ELISA/ICT) ahead of molecular test and microscopy. Due to a small number of sample size for mules, this was excluded from the subgroup analysis. We combined data from both North and South America as a single subgroup called the Americas.
Data extraction and analysis
From the eligible studies, data extracted included first author surname; publication year; sample size; number of positives; country of study; diagnostic method; the species of piroplasms and age; sex and species of equids. Data collected were entered into spreadsheets. Graph-Pad Prism version 5.0 was used for preliminary analysis. Meta-analysis was conducted with Comprehensive Meta-Analysis Version 3.0. For each of the eligible studies, the prevalence was calculated as a percentage by expressing positive cases to sample size. Pooled prevalence and their 95% confidence interval (CI) were determined using MedCalc® statistical software. The prevalence's estimates as well as the P value and 95% CI were obtained using a random-effects model (Hedges and Vevea, Reference Hedges and Vevea1998). Cochran's heterogeneity (Q) within studies as well as percentage variation in prevalence (I 2) was evaluated using the Cochran's Q-test. Heterogeneity was described as low, moderate or high depending on if I 2 was ⩽25, 50 or ⩾75%, respectively (Higgins and Thompson, Reference Higgins and Thompson2002). Publication bias was evaluated using the Egger's regression intercept (Egger et al., Reference Egger, Smith, Schneider and Minder1997). The effect size and corresponding CI for each subgroup was calculated and expressed on forest plots. Furthermore, to determine the source of heterogeneity within subgroups, e.g. sex, age, geographical regions, diagnostic technique and years of study, meta-regression analyses were performed.
Results
Search results and eligible studies
Following a search on the six databases, about 2054 relevant published materials were identified and retrieved. Following the review of their titles, abstracts and duplicates, a total of 1901 studies were excluded. The remaining 153 studies were further screened for eligibility. Studies (n = 87) were excluded for failure to identify the parasite to species level (n = 18); unidentified locations (n = 6); inconsistent data (n = 25); studies with sample size below 50 (n = 8); non-availability of full text (n = 23); and incomplete information on the number of samples tested (n = 7). A total of 66 studies (Table 1) were eligible and subsequently used for the meta-analysis (Fig. 1).
Table 1. List and characteristics of 66 eligible studies included in the meta-analysis
The study parameters included the species of piroplasm; single or mixed infection, equine sex; equine species; equine age; diagnostic technique employed, region(s) of the world and year of publication. All eligible studies were conducted between 1 January 1990 and 25 February 2019. All studies included peer-reviewed journal articles and no attempt was made to check dissertations or thesis. Studies were from Africa (n = 11), Asia (n = 20), Europe (n = 14), the Middle East (n = 8) and Americas (n = 13) (Table 1).
Pooled prevalence estimates
An overall pooled prevalence estimate (PPE) due to EP caused by B. caballi was 22.3% (95% CI 21.7–22.8) from the 66 eligible studies that reported 5348 cases in over 24 041 equids screened (Table 2). Individual point estimates were determined for studies reporting the occurrence of B. caballi (Fig. 2). Furthermore, a significant difference between study heterogeneity was observed (Q = 8531.7, I 2 = 99.9, 95% CI 99.2–99.3, P < 0.0001). The overall PPE due to T. equi was 29.4% (95% CI 28.7–30.0) from the 66 eligible studies with 7074 cases in 24 041 equids screened (Table 3). Individual point estimates were determined for the 66 eligible studies with regards to infection with T. equi (Fig. 3). Finally, 43 studies reported mixed infection with an overall PPE of 11.8% (95% CI 11.3–12.3) of the 16 250 equid samples.
Fig. 2. Forest plot of the prevalence estimates of Babesia caballi in equids globally from 1990 and 2019. Note: The squares show the individual point estimate. The diamond at the base indicates the pooled estimates from the total studies.
Fig. 3. Forest plot of the prevalence estimates of Theileria equi in equids globally from 1990 and 2019. Note: The squares show the individual point estimate. The diamond at the base indicates the pooled estimates from the total studies.
Table 2. Pooled prevalence and risk factors associated with Babesia caballi infection in equines 1990–2019
ELISA, enzyme linked immunosorbent assay; IFAT, Immunofluorescence Antibody Test; PCR, polymerase chain reaction.
Table 3. Pooled prevalence and risk factors associated with Theileria equi infection in equines 1990–2019
ELISA, enzyme linked immunosorbent assay; IFAT, Immunofluorescence Antibody Test; PCR, polymerase chain reaction.
According to region
The Americas had the highest prevalence of 47.9% (95% CI 45.8–49.9%, Q = 1583.3, I 2 = 99.3, P < 0.0001) while the lowest prevalence was in the Middle East (4.8%; 95% CI 3.7–5.8%, Q = 92.1, I 2 = 92.4, P < 0.0001) (Table 2 and Fig. 4). Although Asia region had the highest number of eligible studies examined within the period (n = 22) as well as the largest number of animals (n = 8307; 2124 cases), the prevalence was (25.6%; 24.5–26.6%). Similarly, the prevalence due to T. equi was highest in the Americas (46.5%; 95% CI 44.5–48.6%, Q = 1131.5, I 2 = 99.0, P < 0.0001) compared to the Middle East (18.1%; 95% CI 16.1–20.2%, Q = 211.7, I 2 = 96.7%, P < 0.0001) and Asia (18.1%, 95% CI 17.2–18.9, Q = 2379.4, I 2 = 99.1%, P < 0.0001) (Table 3).
Fig. 4. Forest plot of the prevalence estimates due to equine piroplasms in the Americas. Prevalence due to T. equi in the Americas is illustrated in (A) while estimates due to B. caballi are shown in (B). Note: The squares show the individual point estimate. The diamond at the base indicates the pooled estimates from the total studies.
According to sex
Infection due to both piroplasms was slightly higher in males. For infection due to B. caballi, the PPE in male equids was 5.5% (95% CI 4.9–6.0%, Q = 813.7, I 2 = 98.4, P < 0.0001) compared with 4.5% (95% CI 4.0–4.9%, Q = 549.7, I 2 = 97.6, P < 0.0001) in females (Table 2). A similar observation was also noted in respect to infection with T. equi, males had a prevalence of 16.9% (95% CI 15.5–18.5%, Q = 1003.3, I 2 = 98.2) compared with 16.4% in females (95% CI 15.6–17.3%, Q = 682.7, I 2 = 97.4, P < 0.0001) (Table 3 and Fig. 5).
Fig. 5. Forest plot of the prevalence estimates of Theileria equi in male equids (A) compared with females (B) from 1990 and 2019. Note: The squares show the individual point estimate. The diamond at the base indicates the pooled estimates from the total studies.
According to age
For T. equi infections, the prevalence was slightly higher for those <5 years (16.9%; 95% CI 15.5–18.5%, Q = 397.2, I 2 = 97.5, P < 0.0001) compared with those >5 years (16.4%; 95% CI 14.9–17.9%, Q = 229.9, I 2 = 95.7, P < 0.0001) (Table 3 and Fig. 6). A similar observation was noted in infection due to B. caballi, with prevalence higher in those animals <5 years (13.7%; 95% CI 12.4–15.1%, Q = 554.7, I 2 = 98.2, P < 0.0001) compared with equids >5 years (11.4%; 95% CI 10.1–12.6%, Q = 420.9, I 2 = 97.6, P < 0.0001) (Table 2, S1-Supplementary file).
Fig. 6. Forest plot of the prevalence estimates of Theileria equi in equids <5 years old (A) compared with those above 5 years old (B) from 1990 and 2019. Note: The squares show the individual point estimate. The diamond at the base indicates the pooled estimates from the total studies.
According to diagnostic technique
The PPE for different B. caballi diagnostic methods indicated that ELISA tests were associated with the highest exposure (27.4%; 95% CI 26.5–28.3%, Q = 4779.3, I 2 = 99.5, P < 0.0001) (Table 2, Fig. 7), followed by IFAT (22.9%; 95% CI 22.0–23.8%, Q = 2849.9, I 2 = 99.1, P < 0.0001), PCR (8.4%; 95% CI 7.7–9.1%) and microscopy (4.1%; 95% CI 3.6–4.7%, Q = 459.8, I 2 = 95.2, P < 0.0001) (Table 2). The PPE for T. equi using diferent diagnostic methods indicates that IFAT technique was associated with the highest exposure (41.1%; 95% CI 39.9–42.3%, Q = 3167.4, I 2 = 99.2, P < 0.0001) (Table 3, Fig. 8), followed by PCR (31.6%; 95% CI 30.2–32.9%, Q = 2610.6, I 2 = 98.9, P < 0.0001), ELISA (21.9%; 95% CI 21.0–22.7%, Q = 3037.3, I 2 = 99.2, P < 0.0001) and microscopy (8.1%; 95% CI 7.4–8.9%, Q = 863.0, I 2 = 97.5, P < 0.0001) (Table 3).
Fig. 7. Forest plot of the prevalence estimates of Babesia caballi using ELISA as a diagnostic technique in equids from 1990 and 2019. Note: The squares show the individual point estimate. The diamond at the base indicates the pooled estimates from the total studies.
According to equid species
Infection due to B. caballi was higher in horses (Equus caballus) (22.8%; 95% CI 21.2–23.4%, Q = 77 805, I 2 = 99.3, P < 0.0001) as compared to donkeys (Equus asinus) (15.5%, 95% CI 14.4–17.7%, Q = 807.4, I 2 = 98.9, P < 0.0001) (Table 2, S2-Supplementary file). Infection due to T. equi was higher in donkeys (50.9%; 95% CI 48.1–53.9%, Q = 379.1, I 2 = 97.4, P < 0.0001) as compared to horses (27.8%; 95% CI 27.1–28.5%, Q = 7478.8, I 2 = 99.3, P < 0.0001) (Table 3).
According to years of study
The time span of 1990–1999 had a higher PPE of B. caballi (26.9%; n = 3, Q = 64.7, I 2 = 96.9 P < 0.0001) as compared to the period of 2010–2019 (19.7%; n = 46, Q = 4976.3, I 2 = 99.1, P < 0.0001) (Table 2; S3-Supplementary file). Similarly, the time span of 1990–1999 had a higher T. equi PPE (59.7%; Q = 202.1, I 2 = 99.0, P < 0.0001) as compared to the period of 2010–2019 (29.3%; Q = 4399.2, I 2 = 98.9, P < 0.0001) (Table 3).
Fig. 8. Forest plot of the prevalence estimates of Theileria equi using IFAT as a diagnostic technique in equids from 1990 and 2019. Note: The squares show the individual point estimate. The diamond at the base indicates the pooled estimates from the total studies.
Heterogeneity and publication bias
Results from our study showed strong heterogeneity between the selected studies which were largely influenced by the number of studies and diagnostic techniques. No publication bias was observed in subgroup analysis due to diagnostic technique, age, sex and region. Major publication bias was observed only in the overall PPEs due to B. caballi [Egger's intercept (B0) = −4.79, P = 0.003] and T. equi [Egger's intercept (B0) = −3.67, P < 0.05].
Discussion
It is evident that EP is widespread and endemic in various regions of the world. The PPE for T. equi infection was 29.4%. This estimate is relatively similar to the prevalence of 30.9% reported in Kenya (Hawkins et al., Reference Hawkins, Kock, McKeever, Gakuya, Musyoki, Chege and Skilton2015) and 26.6% in Brazil and Egypt (Kerber et al., Reference Kerber, Labruna, Ferreira, De Waal, Knowles and Gennari2009; Mahmoud et al., Reference Mahmoud, El-Ezz, Abdel-Shafy, Nassar, El Namaky, Khalil and Suarez2016). Higher prevalences have been reported in several studies across different regions of the world (Gummow et al., Reference Gummow, De Wet and De Waal1996; García-Bocanegra et al., Reference García-Bocanegra, Arenas-Montes, Hernández, Adaszek, Carbonero, Almería and Arenas2013; Sumbria et al., Reference Sumbria, Singla and Sharma2016; Díaz-Sánchez et al., Reference Díaz-Sánchez, Pires, Estrada, Cañizares, del Castillo Domínguez, Cabezas-Cruz and Corona-González2018; Onyiche et al., Reference Onyiche, Taioe, Ogo, Sivakumar, Biu, Mbaya, Xuan, Yokoyama and Thekisoe2020). The PPE due to B. caballi was 22.3%, lower than that of T. equi. Generally, the prevalence of T. equi has been found to be higher than that of B. caballi likely due to the fact that T. equi-infected animals remain infected for life (Rüegg et al., Reference Rüegg, Torgerson, Deplazes and Mathis2007). Another possible reason for the differences in the PPE between the two pathogens could be due to differences in vector distribution (Salim et al., Reference Salim, Hassan, Bakheit, Alhassan, Igarashi, Karanis and Abdelrahman2008). Mixed infection of the two piroplasms has been reported in different studies and is unconnected with the presence of the tick vectors responsible for the transmission of both pathogens within the same geographical area infesting their host.
Diagnosis of EP can be achieved by either the use of direct or indirect methods (Abedi et al., Reference Abedi, Razmi, Seifi and Naghibi2015). The gold standard for piroplasm's diagnosis is microscopy but poor sensitivity during low parasitaemia limits its use (Böse et al., Reference Böse, Jorgensen, Dalgliesh, Friedhoff and De Vos1995). Microscopy and PCR techniques are considered direct methods as they indicate active infection and serological assays are considered indirect as they detect the presence of antibodies which is an indicator of exposure rather than an indication of infection status (Abedi et al., Reference Abedi, Razmi, Seifi and Naghibi2015). We observed that the IFAT method detected higher exposure to T. equi, and ELISA detected higher exposure of B. caballi. Infection with B. caballi is transient and best detected during the acute phase of the infection due to low parasitaemia associated with it. Competitive ELISA (cELISA) based on rap-1 demonstrated higher exposure to antibodies of B. caballi as observed in the Venezuelan isolates (Rosales et al., Reference Rosales, Rangel-Rivas, Escalona, Jordan, Gonzatti, Aso and Mijares2013). Nonetheless, the rap-1 region is believed to be highly polymorphic as demonstrated in some epidemiological studies with no positive samples detected using cELISA in Egypt, South Africa and Israel (Bhoora et al., Reference Bhoora, Quan, Zweygarth, Guthrie, Prinsloo and Collins2010; Rapoport et al., Reference Rapoport, Aharonson-Raz, Berlin, Tal, Gottlieb, Klement and Steinman2014; Mahmoud et al., Reference Mahmoud, El-Ezz, Abdel-Shafy, Nassar, El Namaky, Khalil and Suarez2016). Due to variation in the rap-1 gene between geographically diverse isolates with differences in their amino acid sequences, this has led to inconsistency in the commercial rap-1 cELISA assays for the detection of B. caballi strain (Idoko et al., Reference Idoko, Tirosh-Levy, Leszkowicz Mazuz, Mohammed, Sikiti Garba, Wesley and Steinman2020). Therefore, the commercial cELISA for B. caballi is problematic and can lead to a high number of false negatives hence leading to lack of positive samples in some region of the world (Bhoora et al., Reference Bhoora, Quan, Zweygarth, Guthrie, Prinsloo and Collins2010).
On the other hand, infection with T. equi is often lifelong and exposed equids seroconvert after a brief period of infection, usually within 14–16 days. According to the OIE (2005), horses deemed for export must have a negative result to EP when screened using either IFAT or ELISA techniques which remain to be recommended diagnostic methods based on the OIE manual for diagnostic tests and vaccines for terrestrial manual. Therefore, it is not surprising that serological techniques (IFAT and ELISA) were the most efficient in determining the exposure of equids to EP.
Furthermore, microscopy was associated with low prevalence for both pathogens. In several studies, piroplasms were not detected in blood smears but were detected using other techniques such as PCR and serology on same samples that were initially negative (Abutarbush et al., Reference Abutarbush, Alqawasmeh, Mukbel and Al-Majali2012; Munkhjargal et al., Reference Munkhjargal, Sivakumar, Battsetseg, Nyamjargal, Aboulaila, Purevtseren and Igarashi2013). However, the OIE diagnostic manual recommends that microscopic examination to be used in some situations (OIE, 2018). The method continues to be applied in resource-poor countries despite its disadvantages of poor sensitivity during low parasitaemia.
The Americas had the highest PPE for both B. caballi and T. equi infection while the Middle East had the least estimates for both pathogens. The difference in prevalences among geographical regions may be due to the sensitivity of the various diagnostic tests that have been used in the different epidemiological studies; abundance and occurrence of competent tick vectors; husbandry system; activity of the equids; effectiveness of the control measures instituted at the farm and national levels (Kouam et al., Reference Kouam, Kantzoura, Gajadhar, Theis, Papadopoulos and Theodoropoulos2010). In some parts of Africa, the prevalence of EP caused by T. equi was high (Motloang et al., Reference Motloang, Thekisoe, Alhassan, Bakheit, Motheo, Masangane and Mbati2008; Hawkins et al., Reference Hawkins, Kock, McKeever, Gakuya, Musyoki, Chege and Skilton2015; Oduori et al., Reference Oduori, Onyango, Kimari and MacLeod2015). Also, few epidemiological studies have been conducted in the continent despite a handful of equitation sports and traditional local festival where the use of horses is common. It is therefore expedient that more testing be conducted which is necessary before the institution of treatment and control.
The PPE for both B. caballi and T. equi indicates that these parasites are more prevalent in males as compared to females. Individual studies have reported contrasting observations (Sigg et al., Reference Sigg, Gerber, Gottstein, Doherr and Frey2010; Abedi et al., Reference Abedi, Razmi, Seifi and Naghibi2014). Nevertheless, the difference between sexes has not been significant in majority of the individual studies. However, males may have higher tick exposure and immune-suppression due to stress arising from strenuous physical activities (Vieira et al., Reference Vieira, Vieira, Finger, Nascimento, Sicupira, Dutra and Vidotto2013). This may consequently lead to higher infection rates in males. Furthermore, younger equids (<5 years) had a slightly higher PPE for both pathogens compared to the older ones (>5 years). Generally, young horses may reside longer in the fields and consequently, more exposure to tick vectors which increases their likelihood of infection with tick-borne pathogens as compared to adults.
A majority of EP studies focused on horses. The high interest in research-related studies on horses compared to other equids could be due to their high economic value compared with donkeys and other equids (Onyiche et al., Reference Onyiche, Suganuma, Igarashi, Yokoyama, Xuan and Thekisoe2019). Theileria equi PPE was higher in the donkeys as compared to horses. Donkeys are asymptomatic carriers of piroplasms with low parasitaemia and positive antibody titres throughout their lifetime (Balkaya et al., Reference Balkaya, Utuk and Piskin2010). However, PPE was higher in the infection of horses with B. caballi.
In the period spanning 2010–2019, the global PPE due to T. equi has remained stable at 29.3% down from the earlier 59.8% during the period 1990–1999. Similarly, the global PPE due to B. caballi has decreased from 26.9% between the period spanning 1990 and 1999 to 19.7% covering the period 2010–2019. The decrease in the prevalence could be attributed to a better understanding of the epidemiology of the parasite and more efficient control of the vectors. Furthermore, the testing of equids before their export as recommended by the OIE may have further helped to decrease the burden of the disease and help in the curtailment of the spread of the disease between different regions of the world. Additionally, we speculate that the decrease in EP over the time period could also be attributed to differences in the diagnostic techniques over the years.
We have attempted to present a systematic review and meta-analysis of exposure of equids to EP to gain more insight on the global epidemiology of the disease. Due to the pooling of data, we acknowledge that this will lead to significant heterogeneity as a result of the differences in the characteristics among the identified studies despite the use of random-effect model. Some of the limitations include paucity of data which varies across region, publication bias, uneven distribution of prevalence across countries and low sample size in some studies. Therefore, results must be interpreted with caution as apparent prevalence may vary from the actual estimates. Nevertheless, we believe that our report is very close to true estimates of the global exposure of equids to agents of EP.
Conclusion
To the best of our knowledge, this study represents the first systematic review and meta-analysis on the global exposure of equids to agents of EP to better understand the distribution of the disease across the world in the last three decades. All eligible studies incorporated in this systematic review were cross-sectional, further studies incorporating case–control and cohort studies will be required to expand our knowledge horizon on the risk factors and exposures to this disease. Lastly, they are urgent needs for discovering candidate antigens for improved diagnostic tools for the control of equine babesiosis most especially in Africa and the Middle East. Therefore, further studies to fill in this knowledge gap are expedient.
Supplementary material
The supplementary material for this article can be found at https://doi.org/10.1017/S0031182020001407
Acknowledgements
The first author was financially supported by the North West University (NWU) Post graduate student bursary. We thank Cornelia Silaghi, Ana Vasic and Cristian Raileanu for their helpful suggestions on the manuscript.
Financial support
This research work did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies. The first author was financially supported by the North West University (NWU) Post graduate student bursary. The Unit for Environmental Sciences and Management (NWU) also financially supported the first author's scientific travel to Japan through an international travel award.
Conflict of interest
No conflict of interest exists among the authors.
Ethical standards
Not applicable.
