Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-kw2vx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-06T11:37:48.499Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

ILB 938, a valuable faba bean (Vicia faba L.) accession

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 August 2018

H. Khazaei*
Affiliation:
Department of Plant Sciences, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Canada
W. Link
Affiliation:
Department of Crop Sciences, Georg-August-Universität, Göttingen, Germany
K. Street
Affiliation:
International Center for Agricultural Research in the Dry Areas (ICARDA), Rabat, Morocco
F. L. Stoddard
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural Sciences, Viikki Plant Science Centre, and Helsinki Sustainability Science Centre, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
*
*Corresponding author. E-mail: hamid.khazaei@gmail.com, hamid.khazaei@usask.ca
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Here we review the potential of ILB 938 (IG 12132 – doi: 10.18730/60FD2), a unique faba bean accession originating from the Andean region of Colombia and Ecuador, maintained at ICARDA – International Center for Agricultural Research in the Dry Areas, with resistance to multiple biotic and abiotic stresses and carrying some useful morphological markers. It has been used as a donor of leaf-related drought adaptation traits and chocolate spot (Botrytis fabae) resistance genes in faba bean breeding programmes worldwide. From generated populations of recombinant inbred lines, quantitative traits loci associated with these useful traits have been mapped. Other markers, such as a lack of stipule-spot pigmentation and clinging pod wall, show the presence of unusual changes in biochemical pathways that may have economic value in the future.

Type
Short Communication
Copyright
Copyright © NIAB 2018 

Introduction

Faba bean (Vicia faba L.) seeds are a generous source of plant protein, with a global average protein concentration of 29% on a dry-weight basis (Feedipedia, 2018). It is one of the main sources of affordable protein for human consumption in developing countries (consumed as dry or canned), and for livestock feed in many developed countries. The fresh pods and seeds are widely used as a vegetable crop for fresh seed production. Like other legumes, it symbiotically fixes atmospheric nitrogen, thus improving the soil fertility. As a non-host of many cereal pathogens, faba bean is ideal as a break between grain crops in the rotation (Köpke and Nemecek, Reference Köpke and Nemecek2010). It has a mixed breeding system and is cross-pollinated at frequencies of 4–84%, with the value determined by the interaction between the plant genotype, its environment and the population of pollinators (Bond and Poulsen, Reference Bond, Poulsen and Hebblethwaite1983). Its interaction with many species of bee (Stoddard and Bond, Reference Stoddard and Bond1987) makes it suitable for growing in ecological focus areas (Bues et al., Reference Bues, Preissel, Reckling, Zander, Kuhlman, Topp, Watson, Lindström, Stoddard and Murphy-Bokern2013). It is widely adapted to cool-temperate agriculture, being grown from Mediterranean climates in southern Australia and Mediterranean basin countries to sub-boreal climates in Finland and Canada. Nevertheless, faba bean cultivation is limited due to its susceptibility to several biotic and abiotic constraints globally (see Stoddard et al., Reference Stoddard, Balko, Erskine, Khan, Link and Sarker2006; Torres et al., Reference Torres, Roman, Avila, Satovic, Rubiales, Sillero, Cubero and Moreno2006; Khan et al., Reference Khan, Paull, Siddique and Stoddard2010). Hence, genetically diverse sources of resistance genes or genes for specific adaptations such as to abiotic stress factors are required in pre-breeding programmes worldwide. Some of these germplasm sources, called ‘donors’, may become prominent.

Faba bean is represented in germplasm collections by only the cultivated form. Both botanical and molecular data suggest that the wild ancestors of faba bean either have vanished or have not yet been discovered (Maxted, Reference Maxted1993; Duc et al., Reference Duc, Bao, Baum, Redden, Sadiki, Suso, Vishniakova and Zong2010; Kosterin, Reference Kosterin2014; Caracuta et al., Reference Caracuta, Weinstein-Evron, Kaufman, Yeshurun, Silvent and Boaretto2016), which highlights the importance of the accessible diversity within the cultivated form. The place of origin of faba bean is still unknown. A Near or Middle East centre of origin has been proposed (Cubero, Reference Cubero1974), and the earliest identified remains of faba bean date from 10,200 BP in a cave in Israel (Caracuta et al., Reference Caracuta, Barzilai, Khalaily, Milevski, Paz, Vardi, Regev and Boaretto2015). Radiation followed in four directions from the proposed centre: Europe, along the North Africa coast to Spain, along the Nile Valley to Ethiopia and from Mesopotamia to India and China (Lawes et al., Reference Lawes, Bond, Poulsen and Hebblethwaite1983). Spanish and European material was taken to South America in the 16th century (Bond, Reference Bond and Simmonds NW1976). There are 43,695 faba bean accessions conserved within 37 global genebanks (ex situ, FAO, 2010) as well as on-farm conservation (in situ, Kumar et al., Reference Kumar, Singh, Elanchezhian, Sundaram, Singh and Bhatt2012). ICARDA (International Center for Agricultural Research in the Dry Areas) hosts the largest collection of over 9500 accessions (21% of global collection, FAO, 2010). ICARDA maintains its faba bean germplasm in two classes, international legume bean (ILB) accessions from different countries, and bean pure line (BPL) accessions that are derived through selfing from accessions drawn from the ILB collection (Saxena and Varma, Reference Saxena and Varma1985).

Accession ILB 938

ILB 938 is the result of mass selection from ILB 438 based on seed size. ILB 438 was brought to ICARDA from the Andean region of Ecuador and Columbia (Robertson, Reference Robertson, Chapman and Tarawali1984) in 1973. ICARDA's registered BPL derivatives of ILB 438 and ILB 938 are BPL 710 and BPL 1179, respectively. ILB 938/2 is an inbred line developed at Göttingen for use in genetics and breeding studies. The corresponding ‘IG’ number for ILB 938 in the ICARDA genebank is ‘IG 12132’ (accession doi: 10.18730/60FD2, see https://www.genesys-pgr.org/10.18730/60FD2). ILB 438 is registered as IG 11632 in the ICARDA genebank (accession doi: 10.18730/601TB).

Morphological markers

In the wild-type faba bean, the extra-floral nectary on the stipule is coloured black. The presence of stipule-spot pigmentation was proposed as an early morphological marker indicating wild-type ‘coloured’ flowers (tannin-containing faba bean), where there is a black spot on each wing petal and dark vein markings on the standard petal (Picard, Reference Picard1976). The absence of the pigmentation was considered as the corresponding early morphological indicator for the white-flower, zero-tannin trait (Link et al., Reference Link, Hanafy, Malenica, Jacobsen, Jelenić, Kole and Hall2008). ILB 938, however, carries a rare allele (ssp1) that decouples pigmentation in flowers from that in stipules, so it has colourless stipules and coloured flowers (online Supplementary Fig. S1, Khazaei et al., Reference Khazaei, O'Sullivan, Sillanpää and Stoddard2014a). An Australian line, AF11212, has the same phenotype and is derived from BPL 710 (Dr Jeff Paull, The University of Adelaide, Australia; personal communication). Crossing ILB 938/2 with AF11212 (including reciprocal crosses) showed in the F1 and F2 generations uniformly the combination of colourless stipule spots and spotted flowers, confirming that the same gene exists in both accessions (Miller, Reference Miller2016).

The seed size of ILB 938 is classified as equina (horse bean, field bean, flattened seed; 0.6 g/seed), which is expected since it was the medium- to large-seeded Mediterranean-adapted faba bean form that was introduced to Central and South America by immigrants from Spain (Muratova, Reference Muratova1931; Cubero, Reference Cubero1974). The seed coat of ILB 938 is green in colour, which is recessive to the common beige or buff colour (Khazaei et al., Reference Khazaei, O'Sullivan, Sillanpää and Stoddard2014b).

A further noticeable morphological character of ILB 938 is the clinging pod wall, where fibres from the inner epidermis of the pod cling to the surface of the seed (online Supplementary Fig. S2). We have not seen this trait otherwise reported in faba bean germplasm, and while it is of little importance agronomically or economically, it may indicate a difference in cell wall development that has other impacts elsewhere in the plant or in the value chain.

Finally, the funiculus is yellow in ILB 938, in contrast to the common green displayed by other accessions.

Biotic stresses

The resistance of ILB 938 to chocolate spot (CS, caused by Botrytis fabae Speg.) has been demonstrated in Egypt (Mohamed et al., Reference Mohamed, Zeid and Habib1981 [re-coded NEB 938]; Khalil and Nassib, Reference Khalil and Nassib1984; Robertson, Reference Robertson, Chapman and Tarawali1984), Syria (Hanounik, Reference Hanounik1982), the UK (Jellis et al., Reference Jellis, Bond and Old1982), Canada (Robertson, Reference Robertson, Chapman and Tarawali1984), France (Tivoli et al., Reference Tivoli, Berthelem, Leguen and Onfroy1988), and Ethiopia (Beyene et al., Reference Beyene, John, Sibiya and Fikre2016). Further, we have noticed its resistance to CS in field conditions of both southern Finland and western Canada.

The resistance of the original source of ILB 938 was confirmed in the Nile Delta after crosses with the local cultivar Giza 3 (ICARDA Caravan, 1998; Zeid et al., Reference Zeid, Mitchell, Link, Carter, Nawar, Fulton and Kresovich2009). From there, it was transferred to locally adapted material that was released as Giza 461 in Egypt (Bond et al., Reference Bond, Jellis, Rowland, Le Guen, Robertson, Khalil and Li-Juan1994; Dwivedi et al., Reference Dwivedi, Blair, Upadhyaya, Serraj, Balaji, Buhariwalla, Ortiz and Crouch2006; El-Komy et al., Reference El-Komy, Saleh and Molan2015).

The related BPLs BPL 710 and BPL 1179 to ILB 438 and ILB 938, respectively, also showed high resistance to CS across environments (Hanounik and Maliha, Reference Hanounik and Maliha1986; Hanounik and Robertson, Reference Hanounik and Robertson1988; Villegas-Fernández et al., Reference Villegas-Fernández, Sillero and Rubiales2012; Beyene et al., Reference Beyene, Derera and Sibiya2018). The Australian cultivar Icarus was derived from BPL 710 and released as a cultivar resistant to CS and rust (Dwivedi et al., Reference Dwivedi, Blair, Upadhyaya, Serraj, Balaji, Buhariwalla, Ortiz and Crouch2006).

ILB 938 is, furthermore, considered as a consistent source of resistance to rust (Uromyces viciae-fabae (Pers.) J. Schrot.) (Khalil et al., Reference Khalil, Nassib and Mohammed1985; Rashid and Bernier, Reference Rashid and Bernier1986; Rashid and Bernier, Reference Rashid and Bernier1991). Both BPL 710 (Australian accession No. AC1269) and BPL 1179 (AC1272) are registered as rust-resistant accessions in Australia (Ijaz et al., Reference Ijaz, Adhikari, Stoddard and Trethowan2018) as well as in ICARDA (1987).

Some studies have suggested that ILB 938 may also carry resistance to crenate broomrape, Orobanche crenata Forsk., an achlorophyllous, holoparasitic weed, poses a major constraint to faba bean production in Mediterranean climates (Zeid et al., Reference Zeid, Ghazy and Link2006, Reference Zeid, Mitchell, Link, Carter, Nawar, Fulton and Kresovich2009).

Abiotic stresses

Drought adaptation is an essential character for faba bean cultivation in arid and semiarid regions. ILB 938 has demonstrated high water use efficiency (WUE) in several studies (e.g. Abdelmula et al., Reference Abdelmula, Link, von Kittlitz and Stelling1999; Link et al., Reference Link, Abdelmula, von Kittlitz, Bruns, Riemer and Stelling1999; Stoddard et al., Reference Stoddard, Balko, Erskine, Khan, Link and Sarker2006; Khan et al., Reference Khan, Link, Hocking and Stoddard2007, Reference Khan, Paull, Siddique and Stoddard2010; Khazaei et al., Reference Khazaei, Street, Bari, Santanen and Stoddard2013; Khazaei et al., Reference Khazaei, O'Sullivan, Sillanpää and Stoddard2014b) mainly due to low stomatal conductance, thus minimizing water loss and maintaining yield under drought conditions. Nevertheless, its reduced leaf stomatal conductance was not associated with a highly ramified rooting system (Belachew et al., Reference Belachew, Nagel, Fiorani and Stoddard2018).

While ILB 938 has relatively low productivity, no yield penalty was observed when it was exposed to drought conditions (Link et al., Reference Link, Abdelmula, von Kittlitz, Bruns, Riemer and Stelling1999; Khan et al., Reference Khan, Link, Hocking and Stoddard2007; Khazaei et al., Reference Khazaei, O'Sullivan, Sillanpää and Stoddard2014b). It maintains a relatively high water status under water-deficit conditions, demonstrating high WUE with relatively low yield, because its stomata shut early, reducing potential photosynthesis while limiting water loss.

The response of ILB 938/2 to ultraviolet light differs greatly from that of a contrasting cultivar, Aurora/2 that was developed at low altitudes and high latitudes where incident UV is much weaker than high in the Andes (Yan et al., Reference Yan, Neugart, Stoddard and Aphalo2018).

Mapping populations

A population of recombinant inbred lines (RILs) was developed from the cross of Mélodie/2 × ILB 938/2 (along with its reciprocal) at the University of Helsinki (Khazaei et al., Reference Khazaei, O'Sullivan, Sillanpää and Stoddard2014a). This population has been mapped for traits related to drought adaptation (Khazaei et al., Reference Khazaei, O'Sullivan, Sillanpää and Stoddard2014b), vicine–convicine concentration (v–c, Khazaei et al., Reference Khazaei, O'Sullivan, Jones, Pitts, Sillanpää, Pärssinen, Manninen and Stoddard2015) and stipule-spot pigmentation (Khazaei et al., Reference Khazaei, O'Sullivan, Sillanpää and Stoddard2014a). Quantitative traits loci for seed size, seed coat colour, clinging pod wall and yellow funiculus have also been located. ILB 938 and Mélodie differed at two loci affecting stomatal activity at opposite ends of chromosome II, with each parent contributing a canopy-cooling allele (Khazaei et al., Reference Khazaei, O'Sullivan, Sillanpää and Stoddard2014b). The progenies of this population facilitated the development of a reliable molecular marker for v–c in this crop (Khazaei et al., Reference Khazaei, Purves, Song, Stonehouse, Bett, Stoddard and Vandenberg2017). This population is being phenotyped for salinity response in a collaboration with Egypt, and collaborative studies on other traits are in progress. Near-isogenic lines have been derived from heterozygous F5 individuals at Göttingen (Tacke and Link, Reference Tacke and Link2017).

Another RIL population, ILB 938/2 × Disco/2 (Khazaei et al., Reference Khazaei, O'Sullivan, Sillanpää and Stoddard2014a), is suitable for CS genetic studies. Disco (low in both tannin and v–c) has been shown to be very sensitive to CS (Villegas-Fernández et al., Reference Villegas-Fernández, Sillero and Rubiales2012; Khazaei, Personal observation). An RIL population from ILB 938/2 × Aurora/2 (Khazaei et al., Reference Khazaei, O'Sullivan, Sillanpää and Stoddard2014a) will be useful for analysing the basis of the difference in ultraviolet response of these two lines.

A multi-parent population [(Disco/2 × ILB 938/2) × (IG 114476 × IG 132238)] has been prepared for use in genomic studies (Khazaei et al., Reference Khazaei, Stoddard, Purves and Vandenberg2018). This population is at F4 generation at the time of writing this paper and kept at the University of Reading, UK.

DNA fingerprinting

ILB 938/2 was genotyped using 875 single nucleotide polymorphism markers developed by Webb et al. (Reference Webb, Cottage, Wood, Khamassi, Hobbs, Gostkiewicz, White, Khazaei, Ali, Street, Stoddard, Maalouf, Ogbonnaya, Link, Thomas and O'Sullivan2016). The results showed a high level of homozygosity (99.6%, Webb et al., Reference Webb, Cottage, Wood, Khamassi, Hobbs, Gostkiewicz, White, Khazaei, Ali, Street, Stoddard, Maalouf, Ogbonnaya, Link, Thomas and O'Sullivan2016). The genotyping calls on ILB 938/2 are presented in online Supplementary Table S1.

Conclusions

The presence of unusual traits in this material is intriguing, because the crop has been grown in South America for only about 500 of its 10,000 years of domestication. It may be attributable to several causes, including widespread genetic variation introduced by the European settlers, adaptation to extremely varied environments within short distances due to altitude, frequent gene exchanges by pollinators and movement of peoples, and natural selection (Bond et al., Reference Bond, Jellis, Rowland, Le Guen, Robertson, Khalil and Li-Juan1994), or UV-induced mutation. Recently, several new accessions from Spain, Ecuador, Colombia and Peru with high level of resistance to CS were identified (Maalouf et al., Reference Maalouf, Ahmed, Shaaban, Bassam, Nawar, Singh and Amri2016).

Supplementary material

The supplementary material for this article can be found at https://doi.org/10.1017/S1479262118000205.

Acknowledgements

The authors thank Dr Jeff Paull (The University of Adelaide, Australia) for providing the seeds of AF11212. ILB 938 (IG 12132) is also acknowledged for its generous offering. FLS dedicates this paper to the memory of faba bean breeder extraordinaire Dr David Bond (1929–2017), who was a kind mentor and teacher.

References

Abdelmula, AA, Link, W, von Kittlitz, E and Stelling, D (1999) Heterosis and inheritance of drought tolerance in faba bean, Vicia faba L. Plant Breeding 118: 458490.Google Scholar
Belachew, KY, Nagel, KA, Fiorani, F and Stoddard, FL (2018) Diversity in root growth responses to moisture deficit in young faba bean (Vicia faba L.) plants. PeerJ 6: e4401.Google Scholar
Beyene, AT, Derera, J and Sibiya, J (2018) Genetic variability of faba bean genotypes for chocolate spot (Botrytis fabae) resistance and yield. Euphytica 214: 132.Google Scholar
Beyene, AT, John, D, Sibiya, J and Fikre, A (2016) Gene action determining grain yield and chocolate spot (Botrytis fabae) resistance in a faba bean. Euphytica 207: 293304.Google Scholar
Bond, DA (1976) Field bean: Vicia faba (Leguminosae-Papilionatae). In: Simmonds NW, (ed.) Evolution of Crop Plants. London, UK: Longman, pp. 179182.Google Scholar
Bond, DA and Poulsen, MH (1983) Pollination. In: Hebblethwaite, PD (ed.) The Faba Bean (Vicia faba L.). London, UK: Butterworths, pp. 77101.Google Scholar
Bond, DA, Jellis, GJ, Rowland, GG, Le Guen, J, Robertson, LD, Khalil, SA and Li-Juan, L (1994) Present status and future strategy in breeding faba beans (Vicia faba L.) for resistance to biotic and abiotic stresses. Euphytica 73: 151166.Google Scholar
Bues, A, Preissel, S, Reckling, M, Zander, P, Kuhlman, T, Topp, K, Watson, CA, Lindström, K, Stoddard, FL and Murphy-Bokern, D (2013) The environmental role of protein crops in the new Common Agricultural Policy. European Parliament, Directorate General for Internal Policies, Policy Department B: Structural and Cohesion Policies, Agricultural and Rural Development IP/B/AGRI/IC/2012-067. 112 pp. http://www.europarl.europa.eu/studies. ISBN 978-92-823-4521-4, doi: 10.2861/27627. http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/etudes/etudes/join/2013/495856/IPOL-AGRI_ET(2013)495856_EN.pdf, accessed 1 May 2018.Google Scholar
Caracuta, V, Barzilai, O, Khalaily, H, Milevski, I, Paz, Y, Vardi, J, Regev, L and Boaretto, E (2015) The onset of faba bean farming in the southern Levant. Scientific Reports 5: 14370.Google Scholar
Caracuta, V, Weinstein-Evron, M, Kaufman, D, Yeshurun, R, Silvent, J and Boaretto, E (2016) 14,000-year-old seeds indicate the Levantine origin of the lost progenitor of faba bean. Scientific Reports 6: 37399.Google Scholar
Cubero, J (1974) On the evolution of Vicia faba L. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 45: 4751.Google Scholar
Duc, G, Bao, S, Baum, M, Redden, B, Sadiki, M, Suso, MJ, Vishniakova, M and Zong, X (2010) Diversity, maintenance and use of Vicia faba L. genetic resources. Field Crops Research 115: 270278.Google Scholar
Dwivedi, SL, Blair, MW, Upadhyaya, HD, Serraj, R, Balaji, J, Buhariwalla, HK, Ortiz, R and Crouch, JH (2006) Using genomics to exploit grain biodiversity in crop improvement. Plant Breeding Reviews 26: 171310.Google Scholar
El-Komy, MH, Saleh, AA and Molan, YY (2015) Resistance/susceptibility of faba bean to Botrytis fabae: the causal agent of chocolate spot with respect to leaf position. International Journal of Agriculture and Biology 17: 691701.Google Scholar
FAO (2010) The Second Report on the State of the World's Plant Genetic Resources for Food and Agriculture. Rome, Italy. http://www.fao.org/docrep/013/i1500e/i1500e00.htm, accessed 1 May 2018.Google Scholar
Feedipedia (2018) Faba bean (Vicia faba). https://www.feedipedia.org/node/4926, accessed 1 May 2018.Google Scholar
Hanounik, SB (1982) Resistance in faba beans to chocolate spot. FABIS Newsletter 5: 2426.Google Scholar
Hanounik, SB and Maliha, N (1986) Horizontal and vertical resistance in Vicia faba to chocolate spot caused by Botrytis fabae. Plant Disease 70: 770773.Google Scholar
Hanounik, SB and Robertson, LD (1988) New sources of resistance in Vicia faba to chocolate spot caused by Botrytis fabae. Plant Disease 72: 696698.Google Scholar
ICARDA (1987) Faba bean pathology progress report 1986–1987. In: Food Legume Improvement Program, ICARDA, Aleppo, Syria.Google Scholar
ICARDA Caravan (1998) Review of agriculture in the dry areas. Issue No. 9. https://apps.icarda.org/wsInternet/wsInternet.asmx/DownloadFileToLocal?filePath=Caravan/Caravan9.pdf&fileName=Caravan9.pdf, accessed 1 May 2018.Google Scholar
Ijaz, U, Adhikari, KN, Stoddard, FL and Trethowan, RM (2018) Rust resistance in faba bean (Vicia faba L.): status and strategies for improvement. Australasian Plant Pathology 47: 7181.Google Scholar
Jellis, GJ, Bond, DA and Old, J (1982) Resistance to chocolate spot (Botrytis fabae) in ICARDA accessions of Vicia faba. FABIS Newsletter 4: 5354.Google Scholar
Khalil, SA and Nassib, AM (1984) Identification of some sources of resistance to disease in faba bean. I. Chocolate spot (Botrytis fabae Sard.). FABIS Newsletter 10: 1821.Google Scholar
Khalil, SA, Nassib, AM and Mohammed, HA (1985) Identification of some sources of resistance to diseases in faba beans II – rust (Uromyces fabae). FABIS Newsletter 11: 1820.Google Scholar
Khan, HR, Link, W, Hocking, TJH and Stoddard, FL (2007) Evaluation of physiological traits for improving drought tolerance in faba bean (Vicia faba L.). Plant and Soil 292: 205217.Google Scholar
Khan, HR, Paull, JG, Siddique, KHM and Stoddard, FL (2010) Faba bean breeding for drought affected environments: a physiological and agronomic perspective. Field Crops Research 115: 279286.Google Scholar
Khazaei, H, Street, K, Bari, A, Santanen, A and Stoddard, FL (2013) Do faba bean (Vicia faba L.) accessions from environments with contrasting seasonal moisture availabilities differ in stomatal characteristics and related traits? Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution 60: 23432357.Google Scholar
Khazaei, H, O'Sullivan, DM, Sillanpää, MJ and Stoddard, FL (2014a) Genetic analysis reveals a novel locus in Vicia faba decoupling pigmentation in the flower from that in the extra-floral nectaries. Molecular Breeding 34: 15071513.Google Scholar
Khazaei, H, O'Sullivan, DM, Sillanpää, MJ and Stoddard, FL (2014b) Use of synteny to identify candidate genes underlying QTL controlling stomatal traits in faba bean (Vicia faba L.). Theoretical and Applied Genetics 127: 23712385.Google Scholar
Khazaei, H, O'Sullivan, DM, Jones, H, Pitts, N, Sillanpää, MJ, Pärssinen, P, Manninen, O and Stoddard, FL (2015) Flanking SNP markers for vicine-convicine concentration in faba bean (Vicia faba L.). Molecular Breeding 35: 38.Google Scholar
Khazaei, H, Purves, RW, Song, M, Stonehouse, R, Bett, KE, Stoddard, FL and Vandenberg, A (2017) Development and validation of a robust, breeder-friendly molecular marker for the vc locus in faba bean. Molecular Breeding 37: 140.Google Scholar
Khazaei, H, Stoddard, FL, Purves, RW and Vandenberg, A (2018) A multi-parent faba bean (Vicia faba L.) population for future genomic studies. Plant Genetic Resources (in press).Google Scholar
Köpke, U and Nemecek, T (2010) Ecological services of faba bean. Field Crops Research 115: 217233.Google Scholar
Kosterin, OE (2014) The lost ancestors of the broad bean (Vicia faba L.) and the origin of plant cultivation in the Near East. Vavilov Journal of Genetics and Breeding 18: 831840.Google Scholar
Kumar, S, Singh, AK, Elanchezhian, E and Sundaram, PK (2012) In-situ (on-farm) management of faba bean (Vicia faba L.) diversity. In: Singh, AK and Bhatt, BP (eds) Faba Bean (Vicia faba L.): A Potential Leguminous Crop of India. Patna, India: ICAR-Research Complex for Eastern Region, pp. 179184.Google Scholar
Lawes, DA, Bond, DA and Poulsen, MH (1983) Classification, origin, breeding methods and objectives. In: Hebblethwaite, PD (ed.) The Faba Bean (Vicia faba L.). London, UK: Butterworths, pp. 2376.Google Scholar
Link, W, Abdelmula, AA, von Kittlitz, E, Bruns, S, Riemer, H and Stelling, D (1999) Genotypic variation for drought tolerance in Vicia faba. Plant Breeding 118: 477483.Google Scholar
Link, W, Hanafy, M, Malenica, N, Jacobsen, H-J and Jelenić, S (2008) Broad bean. In: Kole, C and Hall, TC (eds) A Compendium of Transgenic Crop Plants: Transgenic Legume Grains and Forages. Wiley, New York, vol. 3, pp. 7188.Google Scholar
Maalouf, F, Ahmed, S, Shaaban, K, Bassam, B, Nawar, F, Singh, M and Amri, A (2016) New faba bean germplasm with multiple resistances to Ascochyta blight, chocolate spot and rust diseases. Euphytica 211: 157167.Google Scholar
Maxted, N (1993) A phenetic investigation of Vicia L. subgenus Vicia (Leguminosae, Vicieae). Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society 111: 155182.Google Scholar
Miller, M (2016) Genetics of pigmentation in faba bean (Vicia faba L.). Undergraduate Thesis, University of Saskatchewan, Canada.Google Scholar
Mohamed, HA, Zeid, NA and Habib, WF (1981) Variation with the fungus Botrytis fabae Sard. FABIS Newsletter 3: 4950.Google Scholar
Muratova, VS (1931) Common beans (Vicia faba L.). Bulletin of Applied Botany of Genetics and Plant Breeding 50: 1298.Google Scholar
Picard, J (1976) Aperçu sur l'héredité du caractère absence de tannins dans les graines de féverole (Vicia faba L.). Annales de l'Amélioration des Plantes 26: 101106.Google Scholar
Rashid, KY and Bernier, CC (1986) Selection for slow rusting in faba bean (Vicia faba L.) to Uromyces viciae-fabae. Crop Protection 5: 218224.Google Scholar
Rashid, KY and Bernier, CC (1991) The effect of rust on yield of faba bean cultivars and slow rusting populations. Canadian Journal of Plant Science 71: 967972.Google Scholar
Robertson, LD (1984) A note on the I.L.B. Source of Botrytis fabae resistance. In: Chapman, GP and Tarawali, SA (eds) Systems for Cytogenetic Analysis in Vicia faba L. Advances in Agricultural Biotechnology. Dordrecht: Springer, vol. 11.Google Scholar
Saxena, MC and Varma, S (1985) Faba beans, Kabuli chickpeas, and lentils in the 1980s. An international workshop. May 16–20, 1983; proceedings. International Centre for Agricultural Research in the Dry Areas. Aleppo, Syria.Google Scholar
Stoddard, FL and Bond, DA (1987) The pollination requirements of the faba bean (Vicia faba L.). Bee World 68: 144152.Google Scholar
Stoddard, FL, Balko, C, Erskine, W, Khan, HR, Link, W and Sarker, A (2006) Screening techniques and sources of resistance to abiotic stresses in cool-season food legumes. Euphytica 147: 167186.Google Scholar
Tacke, R and Link, W (2017) Towards a localization of the ‘vc ’ gene responsible for low vicine and convicine content in seeds of faba bean (Vicia faba L.) and towards a low vicine and convicine winter faba bean cultivar. In: 8th International Conference on Legume Genetics and Genomics, September 18–22, Siófok, Hungary, p. 115.Google Scholar
Tivoli, B, Berthelem, P, Leguen, J and Onfroy, C (1988) A study of the performance of certain faba bean genotypes in relation to Botrytis fabae and Ascochyta fabae in France. FABIS Newsletter 21: 3639.Google Scholar
Torres, AM, Roman, B, Avila, CM, Satovic, Z, Rubiales, D, Sillero, JC, Cubero, JI and Moreno, MT (2006) Faba bean breeding for resistance against biotic stresses: towards applications of marker technology. Euphytica 147: 6780.Google Scholar
Villegas-Fernández, AM, Sillero, JC and Rubiales, D (2012) Screening faba bean for chocolate spot resistance: evaluation methods and effects of age of host tissue and temperature. European Journal of Plant Pathology 132: 443453.Google Scholar
Webb, A, Cottage, A, Wood, T, Khamassi, K, Hobbs, D, Gostkiewicz, K, White, M, Khazaei, H, Ali, M, Street, D, Stoddard, FL, Maalouf, F, Ogbonnaya, F, Link, W, Thomas, J and O'Sullivan, DM (2016) A SNP-based consensus genetic map for synteny-based trait targeting in faba bean (Vicia faba L.). Plant Biotechnology Journal 14: 177185.Google Scholar
Yan, Y, Neugart, S, Stoddard, FL and Aphalo, PJ (2018) Different responses to solar ultraviolet (UV) and blue radiation in two accessions of Vicia faba over two generations. Aspects of Applied Biology 138, Advances in Legume Science and Practice, pp. 63–64.Google Scholar
Zeid, M, Ghazy, AI and Link, W (2006) Questing for Orobanche crenata resistance genes in faba bean. In: New Life Sciences: Changing Lives, 26–29 April 2006, BioVision Alexandria, Egypt.Google Scholar
Zeid, M, Mitchell, S, Link, W, Carter, M, Nawar, A, Fulton, T and Kresovich, S (2009) Simple sequence repeats (SSRs) in faba bean: new loci from Orobanche-resistant cultivar ‘Giza 402’. Plant Breeding 128: 149155.Google Scholar
Supplementary material: File

Khazaei et al. supplementary material

Figure S1

Download Khazaei et al. supplementary material(File)
File 132.7 KB
Supplementary material: File

Khazaei et al. supplementary material

Figure S2

Download Khazaei et al. supplementary material(File)
File 4 MB
Supplementary material: File

Khazaei et al. supplementary material

Table S1

Download Khazaei et al. supplementary material(File)
File 26.6 KB