1 Introduction
Let
${\mathcal A}$
be a Banach algebra. Then
${\mathcal A}^*$
is canonically a Banach
${\mathcal A}$
-bimodule with the actions
![](https://static.cambridge.org/binary/version/id/urn:cambridge.org:id:binary:20240315121132908-0996:S0008439523000061:S0008439523000061_eqnu1.png?pub-status=live)
for all
$a,b\in {\mathcal A}$
and
$x\in {\mathcal A}^*$
. There are two naturally defined products, which we denote by
$\square $
and
$\Diamond $
on the second dual
$\mathcal {A}^{* *}$
of
$\mathcal {A},$
each extending the product on
$\mathcal {A}$
. For
$m, n \in \mathcal {A}^{* *}$
and
$x \in \mathcal {A}^{*},$
the first Arens product
$\square $
in
$\mathcal {A}^{* *}$
is given as follows:
![](https://static.cambridge.org/binary/version/id/urn:cambridge.org:id:binary:20240315121132908-0996:S0008439523000061:S0008439523000061_eqnu2.png?pub-status=live)
where
$n \cdot x \in \mathcal {A}^{*}$
is defined by
$\langle n \cdot x, a\rangle =\langle n, x \cdot a\rangle $
for all
$a \in \mathcal {A}$
. Similarly, the second Arens product
$\Diamond $
in
$\mathcal {A}^{* *}$
satisfies
![](https://static.cambridge.org/binary/version/id/urn:cambridge.org:id:binary:20240315121132908-0996:S0008439523000061:S0008439523000061_eqnu3.png?pub-status=live)
where
$x \cdot m \in \mathcal {A}^{*}$
is given by
$\langle x \cdot m, a\rangle =\langle m, a \cdot x\rangle $
for all
$a \in \mathcal {A} .$
The Banach algebra
$\mathcal {A}$
is called Arens regular if
$\square $
and
$\Diamond $
coincide on
$\mathcal {A}^{* *}$
.
We denote the spectrum of
$\mathcal {A}$
by
$\operatorname {sp}(\mathcal {A})$
. Let
$\varphi \in \operatorname {sp}(\mathcal {A}),$
and let X be a Banach right
$\mathcal {A}$
-submodule of
${\mathcal A}^*$
with
$\varphi \in X$
. Then a left invariant
$\varphi $
-mean on X is a functional
$m\in X^*$
satisfying
![](https://static.cambridge.org/binary/version/id/urn:cambridge.org:id:binary:20240315121132908-0996:S0008439523000061:S0008439523000061_eqnu4.png?pub-status=live)
Right and (two-sided) invariant
$\varphi $
-means are defined similarly. The Banach algebra
$\mathcal {A}$
is called left
$\varphi $
-amenable if there exists a left invariant
$\varphi $
-mean on
${\mathcal A}^*$
(see [Reference Kaniuth, Lau and Pym7]). This notion generalizes the concept of left amenability for Lau algebras, a class of Banach algebras including all convolution quantum group algebras, which was first introduced and studied in [Reference Lau10].
A Banach right (resp. left)
$\mathcal {A}$
-submodule X of
$\mathcal {A}^{*}$
is called left (resp. right) introverted if
$X^{*} \cdot X \subseteq X$
(resp.
$X \cdot X^* \subseteq X$
). In this case,
$X^{*}$
is a Banach algebra with the multiplication induced by the first (resp. second) Arens product
$\square $
(resp.
$\Diamond $
) inherited from
$\mathcal {A}^{* *}$
. A Banach
$\mathcal {A}$
-subbimodule X of
$\mathcal {A}^{*}$
is called introverted if it is both left and right introverted (see [Reference Dales and Lau2, Chapter 5] for details).
An element x of
$\mathcal {A}^{*}$
is weakly almost periodic if the map
$\lambda _x: a \mapsto a\cdot x $
from
$\mathcal {A}$
into
$\mathcal {A}^{*}$
is a weakly compact operator. Let
$\operatorname {WAP}(\mathcal {A})$
denote the closed subspace of
${\mathcal A}^*$
consisting of the weakly almost periodic functionals on
$\mathcal {A}$
. Then
$\operatorname {WAP}(\mathcal {A})$
is an introverted subspace of
$\mathcal {A}^{*}$
containing
$\operatorname {sp}(\mathcal {A})$
. We would like to recall from [Reference Dales and Lau2, Proposition 3.11] that
$m\square n= m\Diamond n $
for all
$m,n\in \operatorname {WAP}(\mathcal {A})^*$
. Now suppose that I is a closed ideal in
${\mathcal A}$
with a bounded approximate identity. Then, by [Reference Dales and Lau2, Proposition 3.12]
$\operatorname {WAP}(I)$
is a neo-unital Banach I-bimodule; that is,
$\operatorname {WAP}(I) = I\cdot \operatorname {WAP}(I) = \operatorname {WAP}(I)\cdot I$
. Moreover,
$\operatorname {WAP}(I)$
becomes a Banach
${\mathcal A}$
-bimodule (see [Reference Runde14, Proposition 2.1.6]).
In the case that A is the group algebra
$L^1(G)$
of a locally compact group G, it is known that
$\operatorname {WAP}(L^1(G))$
admits an invariant mean, which is unique, that is, a norm one functional
$m\in L^1(G)^{**}$
with
$\langle m, 1\rangle = 1$
and
![](https://static.cambridge.org/binary/version/id/urn:cambridge.org:id:binary:20240315121132908-0996:S0008439523000061:S0008439523000061_eqnu5.png?pub-status=live)
for all
$x\in \operatorname {WAP}(L^1(G))$
and
$f\in L^1(G)$
(see [Reference Wong17]).
Furthermore, it is known from [Reference Dales, Lau and Strauss3, Proposition 5.16] that if G is discrete or amenable, then
$\operatorname {WAP}(M(G))$
admits an invariant mean, which is unique, where
$M(G)$
denotes the measure algebra of G. Recently, Neufang in [Reference Neufang12] generalized this latter result to arbitrary locally compact groups, thereby answering a question posed in [Reference Dales, Lau and Strauss3].
In this article, we generalize the main result of [Reference Neufang12] to an arbitrary Banach algebra
${\mathcal A}$
. More precisely, for
$\varphi \in \operatorname {sp}({\mathcal A})$
, we show that if I is a closed ideal of
${\mathcal A}$
with a bounded approximate identity such that
$I\not \subseteq \ker \varphi $
, then
$\operatorname {WAP}(\mathcal {A})$
admits a right (left) invariant
$\varphi $
-mean if and only if
$\operatorname {WAP}(I)$
admits a right (left) invariant
$\varphi |_I$
-mean. Applying our results to algebras over locally compact (quantum) groups, we show that, if I is a closed ideal of
$L^1(G)$
with a bounded approximate identity such that
$I\not \subseteq \ker 1$
, then I is Arens regular if and only if it is reflexive.
Finally, for a locally compact quantum group
${\mathbb G}$
, we characterize the existence of left and right invariant
$1$
-means on
$ \operatorname {WAP}(\mathcal {T}_{\triangleright }({\mathbb G}))$
, where
$\mathcal {T}_{\triangleright }({\mathbb G})$
denotes the trace class operators on
$L^2({\mathbb G})$
, but equipped with a product different from composition (see [Reference Hu, Neufang and Ruan6].
2 Preliminaries
The class of locally compact quantum groups was first introduced and studied by Kustermans and Vaes [Reference Kustermans and Vaes8, Reference Kustermans and Vaes9]. Recall that a (von Neumann algebraic) locally compact quantum group is a quadruple
${\mathbb G}=(L^{\infty }({\mathbb G}), \Delta , \phi , \psi )$
, where
$L^{\infty }({\mathbb G})$
is a von Neumann algebra with identity element
$1$
and a co-multiplication
$ \Delta : L^{\infty }({\mathbb G})\rightarrow L^{\infty }({\mathbb G})\bar {\otimes }L^{\infty }({\mathbb G}). $
Moreover,
$\phi $
and
$\psi $
are normal faithful semifinite left and right Haar weights on
$L^{\infty }({\mathbb G})$
, respectively. Here,
$\bar {\otimes }$
denotes the von Neumann algebra tensor product.
The predual of
$L^{\infty }({\mathbb G})$
is denoted by
$L^1({\mathbb G})$
which is called quantum group algebra of
$\mathbb {G}$
. Then the pre-adjoint of the co-multiplication
$\Delta $
induces on
$L^1({\mathbb G})$
an associative completely contractive multiplication
$\Delta _*:L^1({\mathbb G})\widehat {\otimes }L^1({\mathbb G})\rightarrow L^1({\mathbb G})$
, where
$\widehat {\otimes }$
is the operator space projective tensor product. Therefore,
$L^1({\mathbb G})$
is a Banach algebra under the product
$*$
given by
$f*g:=\Delta _*(f\otimes g)\in L^1({\mathbb G})$
for all
$f,g\in L^1({\mathbb G})$
. Moreover, the module actions of
$L^1({\mathbb G})$
on
$L^{\infty }({\mathbb G})$
are given by
![](https://static.cambridge.org/binary/version/id/urn:cambridge.org:id:binary:20240315121132908-0996:S0008439523000061:S0008439523000061_eqnu6.png?pub-status=live)
for all
$f\in L^1({\mathbb G})$
and
$x\in L^{\infty }({\mathbb G})$
.
For every locally compact quantum group
$\mathbb {G}$
, there is a left fundamental unitary operator
$W\in L^{\infty }(\mathbb {G})\bar {\otimes } L^{\infty }(\widehat {\mathbb {G}})$
and a right fundamental unitary operator
$V\in L^{\infty }(\widehat {\mathbb {G}})'\bar {\otimes } L^{\infty }(\mathbb {G}) $
which the co-multiplication
$\Delta $
can be given in terms of W and V by the formula
![](https://static.cambridge.org/binary/version/id/urn:cambridge.org:id:binary:20240315121132908-0996:S0008439523000061:S0008439523000061_eqnu7.png?pub-status=live)
where
$ L^{\infty }(\widehat {\mathbb G}):={\{(f\otimes \mathrm {id})(W)\;:\; f\in L^1(\mathbb G)\}}^{"} $
. The Gelfand–Naimark–Segal (GNS) representation space for the left Haar weight will be denoted by
$L^2({\mathbb G})$
. Put
$\widehat {W}=\sigma W^*\sigma $
, where
$\sigma $
denotes the flip operator on
$B(L^2({\mathbb G})\otimes L^2({\mathbb G}))$
, and define
![](https://static.cambridge.org/binary/version/id/urn:cambridge.org:id:binary:20240315121132908-0996:S0008439523000061:S0008439523000061_eqnu8.png?pub-status=live)
which is a co-multiplication. One can also define a left Haar weight
$\hat {\varphi }$
and a right Haar weight
$\hat {\psi }$
on
$L^{\infty }(\widehat {\mathbb G})$
that
$\widehat {\mathbb G}=(L^{\infty }(\widehat {\mathbb G}),\widehat {\Gamma }, \hat {\varphi }, \hat {\psi }),$
the dual quantum group of
${\mathbb G}$
, turn it into a locally compact quantum group. Moreover, a Pontryagin duality theorem holds, that is,
$\widehat {\widehat {\mathbb G}}={\mathbb G}$
(for more details, see [Reference Kustermans and Vaes8, Reference Kustermans and Vaes9]). The reduced quantum group
$C^*$
-algebra of
$L^{\infty }({\mathbb G})$
is defined as
![](https://static.cambridge.org/binary/version/id/urn:cambridge.org:id:binary:20240315121132908-0996:S0008439523000061:S0008439523000061_eqnu9.png?pub-status=live)
We say that
${\mathbb G}$
is compact if
$C_0({\mathbb G})$
is a unital
$C^*$
-algebra. The co-multiplication
$\Delta $
maps
$C_0({\mathbb G})$
into the multiplier algebra
$M(C_0({\mathbb G})\otimes C_0({\mathbb G}))$
of the minimal
$C^*$
-algebra tensor product
$C_0({\mathbb G})\otimes C_0({\mathbb G})$
. Thus, we can define the completely contractive product
$*$
on
$C_0({\mathbb G})^*=M({\mathbb G})$
by
![](https://static.cambridge.org/binary/version/id/urn:cambridge.org:id:binary:20240315121132908-0996:S0008439523000061:S0008439523000061_eqnu10.png?pub-status=live)
whence
$(M({\mathbb G}), *)$
is a completely contractive Banach algebra and contains
$L^1({\mathbb G})$
as a norm closed two-sided ideal. If X is a Banach right
$L^1({\mathbb G})$
-submodule of
$L^{\infty }({\mathbb G})$
with
$1\in X$
, then a left invariant mean on X, is a functional
$m\in X^*$
satisfying
![](https://static.cambridge.org/binary/version/id/urn:cambridge.org:id:binary:20240315121132908-0996:S0008439523000061:S0008439523000061_eqnu11.png?pub-status=live)
Right and (two-sided) invariant means are defined similarly. A locally compact quantum group
${\mathbb G}$
is said to be amenable if there exists a left (equivalently, right, or two-sided) invariant mean on
$L^{\infty }({\mathbb G})$
(see [Reference Desmedt, Quaegebeur and Vaes4, Proposition 3]). A standard argument, used in the proof of [Reference Lau10, Theorem 4.1] on Lau algebras shows that
${\mathbb G}$
is amenable if and only if
$L^1({\mathbb G})$
is left
$1$
-amenable. We also recall that,
$\mathbb {G}$
is called co-amenable if
$L^1({\mathbb G})$
has a bounded approximate identity.
The right fundamental unitary V of
$\mathbb {G}$
induces a co-associative co-multiplication
![](https://static.cambridge.org/binary/version/id/urn:cambridge.org:id:binary:20240315121132908-0996:S0008439523000061:S0008439523000061_eqnu12.png?pub-status=live)
and the restriction of
$\Delta ^{r}$
to
$L^{\infty }(\mathbb {G})$
yields the original co-multiplication
$\Delta $
on
$L^{\infty }(\mathbb {G})$
. The pre-adjoint of
$\Delta ^{r}$
induces an associative completely contractive multiplication on space
$\mathcal {T}\left (L^{2}(\mathbb {G})\right )$
of trace class operators on
$L^{2}(\mathbb {G})$
, defined by
![](https://static.cambridge.org/binary/version/id/urn:cambridge.org:id:binary:20240315121132908-0996:S0008439523000061:S0008439523000061_eqnu13.png?pub-status=live)
where
$\widehat {\otimes }$
denotes the operator space projective tensor product.
It was shown in [Reference Hu, Neufang and Ruan6, Lemma 5.2], that the pre-annihilator
$L^{\infty }(\mathbb {G})_{\perp }$
of
$L^{\infty }(\mathbb {G})$
in
$\mathcal {T}\left (L^{2}(\mathbb {G})\right )$
is a norm closed two-sided ideal in
$\left (\mathcal {T}\left (L^{2}(\mathbb {G})\right ), \triangleright \right )$
and the complete quotient map
![](https://static.cambridge.org/binary/version/id/urn:cambridge.org:id:binary:20240315121132908-0996:S0008439523000061:S0008439523000061_eqnu14.png?pub-status=live)
is a completely contractive algebra homomorphism from
$\mathcal {T}_{\triangleright }({\mathbb G}):=\left (\mathcal {T}\left (L^{2}(\mathbb {G})\right ), \triangleright \right )$
onto
$L^{1}(\mathbb {G})$
. The multiplication
$\triangleright $
defines a canonical
$\mathcal {T}_{\triangleright }({\mathbb G})$
-bimodule structure on
$\mathcal {B}\left (L^{2}(\mathbb {G})\right )$
. Note that since
$V \in L^{\infty }(\widehat {\mathbb {G}}^{\prime }) \bar {\otimes } L^{\infty }(\mathbb {G})$
, the bimodule action on
$L^{\infty }(\widehat {\mathbb {G}})$
becomes rather trivial. Indeed, for
$\hat {x} \in L^{\infty }(\widehat {\mathbb {G}})$
and
$\omega \in \mathcal {T}_{\triangleright }({\mathbb G}),$
we have
![](https://static.cambridge.org/binary/version/id/urn:cambridge.org:id:binary:20240315121132908-0996:S0008439523000061:S0008439523000061_eqnu15.png?pub-status=live)
This implies that
$L^{\infty }(\widehat {\mathbb {G}})\subseteq \operatorname {WAP}(\mathcal {T}_{\triangleright }({\mathbb G}))$
. It is also known from [Reference Hu, Neufang and Ruan6, Proposition 5.3] that
$B(L^2({\mathbb G}))\triangleright \mathcal {T}_{\triangleright }({\mathbb G})\subseteq L^{\infty }({\mathbb G}).$
In particular, the actions of
$\mathcal {T}_{\triangleright }({\mathbb G})$
on
$L^{\infty }(\mathbb {G})$
satisfies
![](https://static.cambridge.org/binary/version/id/urn:cambridge.org:id:binary:20240315121132908-0996:S0008439523000061:S0008439523000061_eqnu16.png?pub-status=live)
for all
$\omega \in \mathcal {T}_{\triangleright }({\mathbb G})$
and
$ x\in L^{\infty }(\mathbb {G})$
.
3 Invariant means on weakly almost periodic functionals
Let I be a closed ideal of the Banach algebra
$\mathcal {A}$
. Then for every
$b \in I$
and
$x \in I^{*}$
, define
$x \bullet b, b \bullet x \in \mathcal {A}^*$
as follows:
![](https://static.cambridge.org/binary/version/id/urn:cambridge.org:id:binary:20240315121132908-0996:S0008439523000061:S0008439523000061_eqnu17.png?pub-status=live)
We note that, given
$a\in {\mathcal A}, b_1, b_2\in I$
, and
$x\in I^*$
, for
$a'\in {\mathcal A}$
, we have
![](https://static.cambridge.org/binary/version/id/urn:cambridge.org:id:binary:20240315121132908-0996:S0008439523000061:S0008439523000061_eqnu18.png?pub-status=live)
so that,
$ a\cdot ((b_1\cdot x)\bullet b_2)=(ab_1\cdot x)\bullet b_2$
.
Lemma 3.1 Let
${\mathcal A}$
be a Banach algebra, and let I be a closed ideal of
${\mathcal A}$
with a bounded approximate identity. Then
![](https://static.cambridge.org/binary/version/id/urn:cambridge.org:id:binary:20240315121132908-0996:S0008439523000061:S0008439523000061_eqnu19.png?pub-status=live)
Proof Let
$x\in \mathrm {WAP}(I)$
and
$b_1, b_2\in I$
. Suppose that
$(a_n)$
is a bounded sequence in
${\mathcal A}$
. Then
$(a_nb_1)$
is a bounded sequence in I and so by weak compactness of the map
$\lambda _x: I\rightarrow I^*$
, there is a subsequence
$(a_{n_j}b_1)$
of
$(a_nb_1)$
such that
$(a_{n_j}b_1\cdot x)$
converges weakly in
$I^*$
to some
$y\in I^*$
. Now, for each
$m\in {\mathcal A}^{**}$
, define the functional
$b_2\bullet m\in I^{**}$
as follows:
![](https://static.cambridge.org/binary/version/id/urn:cambridge.org:id:binary:20240315121132908-0996:S0008439523000061:S0008439523000061_eqnu20.png?pub-status=live)
It follows that
![](https://static.cambridge.org/binary/version/id/urn:cambridge.org:id:binary:20240315121132908-0996:S0008439523000061:S0008439523000061_eqnu21.png?pub-status=live)
for all
$m\in {\mathcal A}^{**}$
. That is,
$(b_1\cdot x)\bullet b_2\in \mathrm {WAP}(\mathcal {A})$
. Since I has a bounded right approximate identity, it follows from [Reference Dales and Lau2, Proposition 3.12] that
$I\cdot \mathrm {WAP}(I)=\mathrm {WAP}(I)$
. This shows that
$\mathrm {WAP}(I)\bullet I\subseteq \mathrm {WAP}(\mathcal {A})$
. The inclusion
$I\bullet \mathrm {WAP}(I)\subseteq \mathrm {WAP}(\mathcal {A})$
can be proved similarly.
Theorem 3.2 Let
${\mathcal A}$
be a Banach algebra with
$\varphi \in \operatorname {sp}(\mathcal {A})$
, and let I be a closed ideal of
${\mathcal A}$
with a bounded approximate identity such that
$I\not \subseteq \ker \varphi $
. Then the following statements are equivalent:
-
(i)
$\mathrm {WAP}(I)$ has a right (left) invariant
$\varphi |_I$ -mean.
-
(ii)
$\mathrm {WAP}(A)$ has a right (left) invariant
$\varphi $ -mean.
Proof We only prove the right version of the theorem. Similar arguments will establish the left side version.
(i)
$\Rightarrow $
(ii). Let m be a right invariant
$\varphi |_I$
-mean on
$\mathrm {WAP}(I)$
. This means that for every
$x\in \mathrm {WAP}(I)$
and
$b\in I,$
we have
![](https://static.cambridge.org/binary/version/id/urn:cambridge.org:id:binary:20240315121132908-0996:S0008439523000061:S0008439523000061_eqnu22.png?pub-status=live)
We denote by
$\imath :I\rightarrow {\mathcal A}$
the canonical embedding map. By [Reference Young18, Corollary to Lemma 1], the map
$R:=\imath ^*: {\mathcal A}^*\rightarrow I^*$
maps
$\operatorname {WAP}({\mathcal A})$
to
$\mathrm {WAP}(I)$
. Define
${\widetilde m}:=m\circ R\in {\mathcal A}^{**}$
. It is easy to see that
$ \langle {\widetilde m}, \varphi \rangle =1. $
Let
$(e_{\alpha })$
be a bounded approximate identity for I. By [Reference Dales and Lau2, Proposition 3.12], we have
$I\cdot \operatorname {WAP}(I)=\operatorname {WAP}(I)\cdot I=\operatorname {WAP}(I)$
. Thus,
$\lim _{\alpha } e_{\alpha }\cdot R(y)=R(y)$
for all
$y\in \operatorname {WAP}({\mathcal A})$
. Moreover, by [Reference Runde14, Proposition 2.1.6],
$\mathrm {WAP}(I)$
becomes a Banach
${\mathcal A}$
-bimodule and since I is an ideal in
${\mathcal A}$
, it is not hard check that
$R(a\cdot y)=a\cdot R(y)$
for all
$a\in {\mathcal A}$
and
$y\in \operatorname {WAP}({\mathcal A})$
. Therefore, for every
$a\in {\mathcal A}$
and
$y\in \operatorname {WAP}({\mathcal A})$
, we have
![](https://static.cambridge.org/binary/version/id/urn:cambridge.org:id:binary:20240315121132908-0996:S0008439523000061:S0008439523000061_eqnu23.png?pub-status=live)
Thus,
${\widetilde m}$
is a right invariant
$\varphi $
-mean on
$\operatorname {WAP}({\mathcal A})$
.
(ii)
$\Rightarrow $
(i). Let
$m \in {\mathcal A}^{**}$
be a right invariant
$\varphi $
-mean on
$\operatorname {WAP}({\mathcal A})$
. Fix
$b_{0} \in I$
with
$\varphi (b_0)=1$
. Since
$\operatorname {WAP}(I)\bullet b_0\subseteq \operatorname {WAP}({\mathcal A})$
, by Lemma 3.1, we can define
$\tilde {m} \in \operatorname {WAP}(I)^{*}$
as follows:
![](https://static.cambridge.org/binary/version/id/urn:cambridge.org:id:binary:20240315121132908-0996:S0008439523000061:S0008439523000061_eqnu24.png?pub-status=live)
It is easily verified that
![](https://static.cambridge.org/binary/version/id/urn:cambridge.org:id:binary:20240315121132908-0996:S0008439523000061:S0008439523000061_eqnu25.png?pub-status=live)
Moreover, for every
$b\in I$
and
$x \in \operatorname {WAP}(I)$
, we have
![](https://static.cambridge.org/binary/version/id/urn:cambridge.org:id:binary:20240315121132908-0996:S0008439523000061:S0008439523000061_eqnu26.png?pub-status=live)
Therefore,
$\tilde {m}$
is a right
$\left .\varphi \right |{}_{I}$
-mean on
$\operatorname {WAP}(I)$
.
Remark 3.3 We would like to point out the following fact related to right and left invariant
$\varphi $
-means on
$\mathrm {WAP}({\mathcal A})$
. Suppose that m is a left invariant
$\varphi $
-mean and n is a right invariant
$\varphi $
-mean on
$\mathrm {WAP}({\mathcal A})$
. Using weak
$^*$
-continuity of the maps
$p\mapsto p\square m$
and
$p\mapsto n\Diamond p$
on
$\mathrm {WAP}({\mathcal A})^*$
, we obtain that
$m=n(\varphi )m=n\square m=n\Diamond m=m(\varphi )n=n$
. In particular, if there is an invariant
$\varphi $
-mean on
$\mathrm {WAP}({\mathcal A})$
, then it is unique.
We now consider some special cases. Suppose that
${\mathbb G}$
is a locally compact quantum group. Then
${\Bbb G}$
has a canonical co-involution
${\mathcal R}$
, called the unitary antipode of
${\Bbb G}$
. That is,
${\mathcal R}: L^{\infty }({\Bbb G})\longrightarrow L^{\infty }({\Bbb G})$
is a
$^*$
-anti-homomorphism satisfying
${\mathcal R}^2=\mathrm {id}$
and
$ \Delta \circ {\mathcal R}=\sigma ({\mathcal R}\otimes {\mathcal R})\circ \Delta , $
where
$\sigma $
is the flip map on
$L^2({\Bbb G})\otimes L^2({\Bbb G})$
. Then
${\mathcal R}$
induces a completely isometric involution on
$L^1({\Bbb G})$
defined by
![](https://static.cambridge.org/binary/version/id/urn:cambridge.org:id:binary:20240315121132908-0996:S0008439523000061:S0008439523000061_eqnu27.png?pub-status=live)
Hence,
$L^1({\Bbb G})$
becomes an involutive Banach algebra.
Now, assume that m is a left (resp. right) invariant
$1$
-mean on
$\operatorname {WAP}(L^1({\mathbb G}))$
, and let
$\widetilde {m}\in L^{\infty }({\mathbb G})^*$
be a Hahn–Banach extension of m. It is not hard to see that
$n:=\widetilde {m}^{\circ }|_{\operatorname {WAP}(L^1({\mathbb G})}$
is a right (resp. left) invariant
$1$
-mean on
$\operatorname {WAP}(L^1({\mathbb G}))$
, where
$\circ : L^{\infty }({\mathbb G})^*\rightarrow L^{\infty }({\mathbb G})^*, m\mapsto m^{\circ }$
is the unique weak
$^*$
-weak
$^*$
continuous extension of the involution on
$L^1({\mathbb G})$
which is called the linear involution (see [Reference Dales and Lau2, Chapter 2, p. 18]. Thus, by Remark 3.3, we obtain that any left (resp. right) invariant
$1$
-mean on
$\operatorname {WAP}(L^1({\mathbb G}))$
is unique and (two-sided) invariant.
Our next result yields a generalization of [Reference Neufang12, Theorem 2.3] which is concerned with the group algebra
$L^1(G)$
as an ideal in the measure algebra
$M(G)$
, for a locally compact group G.
Corollary 3.4 Let
${\mathbb G}$
be a co-amenable locally compact quantum group. Then
$\operatorname {WAP}(L^1({\mathbb G}))$
has a right invariant
$1$
-mean or equivalently has an invariant
$1$
-mean if and only if
$\operatorname {WAP}(M({\mathbb G}))$
has an invariant
$1$
-mean.
Proposition 3.5 Let
${\mathcal A}$
is a Banach algebra, and let I is a closed ideal in
${\mathcal A}$
. Let
$\varphi \in \operatorname {sp}(\mathcal {A})$
be such that
$I\not \subseteq \ker \varphi $
. Then
${\mathcal A}^*$
admits a right invariant
$\varphi $
-mean if and only if
$I^*$
admits a right invariant
$\varphi |_I$
-mean.
Proof To see this, first note that, since we can identify
$I^{**}$
with
$I^{\perp \perp }$
, it follows that
$I^{**}$
is a closed ideal in
${\mathcal A}^{**}$
(see [Reference Dales and Lau2, p. 17]). Fix
$b_0\in I$
with
$\varphi (b_0)=1$
. Now, suppose that
$m\in {\mathcal A}^{**}$
is a right invariant
$\varphi $
-mean on
${\mathcal A}^*$
. Since
$I^{**}$
is an ideal in
${\mathcal A}^{**}$
, we obtain that
$b_0\square m\in I^{**}$
. Furthermore,
$\langle b_0\square m, \varphi \rangle =1$
and
![](https://static.cambridge.org/binary/version/id/urn:cambridge.org:id:binary:20240315121132908-0996:S0008439523000061:S0008439523000061_eqnu28.png?pub-status=live)
for all
$b\in I$
. Thus,
$b_0\square m$
is a right invariant
$\varphi |_I$
-mean on
${I}^*$
. For the converse, suppose that
$m\in {I}^{**}$
is a right invariant
$\varphi |_I$
-mean on
$I^*$
. Then
![](https://static.cambridge.org/binary/version/id/urn:cambridge.org:id:binary:20240315121132908-0996:S0008439523000061:S0008439523000061_eqnu29.png?pub-status=live)
for all
$a\in {\mathcal A}$
. This shows that m is a right invariant
$\varphi $
-mean on
${\mathcal A}^*$
.
Before giving the next result, we recall that a Banach algebra
${\mathcal A}$
is weakly sequentially complete if every weakly Cauchy sequence in
${\mathcal A}$
is weakly convergent in
${\mathcal A}$
. For example, preduals of von Neumann algebras are weakly sequentially complete (see [Reference Takesaki15]).
Proposition 3.6 Let
${\mathbb G}$
be a locally compact quantum group such that
$\operatorname {WAP}(L^1({\mathbb G}))$
has an invariant
$1$
-mean, and let I be a closed ideal of
$L^1({\mathbb G})$
with a bounded approximate identity such that
$I\not \subseteq \ker 1$
. If I is Arens regular, then
${\mathbb G}$
is compact.
Proof By assumption and Theorem 3.2, we conclude that
$\operatorname {WAP}(I)$
has a right invariant
$1$
-mean. Since I is Arens regular, we have that
$\operatorname {WAP}(I)=I^*$
. This implies that I is right
$1$
-amenable. Now, by Proposition 3.5, we obtain that
$L^1({\mathbb G})$
is right
$1$
-amenable or equivalently,
${\mathbb G}$
is amenable. Thus, there is an invariant
$1$
-mean on
$L^{\infty }({\mathbb G})$
. Again by two-sided version of Proposition 3.5, we conclude that there is an invariant
$1$
-mean m on
$I^*$
. Since I is Arens regular and weakly sequentially complete, it follows from [Reference Kaniuth, Lau and Pym7, Theorem 3.9] that
$m\in I$
. Therefore, for every
$f\in L^1({\mathbb G})$
, we have
![](https://static.cambridge.org/binary/version/id/urn:cambridge.org:id:binary:20240315121132908-0996:S0008439523000061:S0008439523000061_eqnu30.png?pub-status=live)
Thus, m is a left invariant
$1$
-mean belonging to
$L^1({\mathbb G})$
, and equivalently
${\mathbb G}$
is compact (see [Reference Bédos and Tuset1, Proposition 3.1]).
Theorem 3.7 Let
${\mathbb G}$
be a locally compact quantum group such that
$\operatorname {WAP}(L^1({\mathbb G}))$
has an invariant
$1$
-mean, and let I be a closed ideal of
$L^1({\mathbb G})$
with a bounded approximate identity such that
$I\not \subseteq \ker 1$
. Then I is Arens regular if and only if it is reflexive.
Proof If I is reflexive, then I is clearly Arens regular. Conversely, suppose that I is Arens regular. Then
${\mathbb G}$
is compact by Proposition 3.6 and so by [Reference Runde13, Theorem 3.8],
$L^1({\mathbb G})$
is an ideal in its bidual. Since I has a bounded approximate identity, Cohen’s Factorization theorem implies that
$I*I=\{a*b: a, b\in I\}=I$
. Hence, we drive that
![](https://static.cambridge.org/binary/version/id/urn:cambridge.org:id:binary:20240315121132908-0996:S0008439523000061:S0008439523000061_eqnu31.png?pub-status=live)
This shows that I is a right ideal in its bidual. Thus, by [Reference Ulger16, Corollar ies 3.7 and 3.9], we obtain that I is reflexive.
Dually to [Reference Forrest5, Proposition 3.14], we obtain the result below for the group algebra
$L^1(G)$
of a locally compact group G. We would like to recall that
$\operatorname {WAP}(L^1(G))$
admits an invariant mean.
Corollary 3.8 Let G be a locally compact group, and let I be a closed ideal of
$L^1(G)$
with a bounded approximate identity such that
$I\not \subseteq \ker 1$
. Then I is Arens regular if and only if it is reflexive.
4 Convolution trace class operators
We recall from [Reference Lau10] that a Lau algebra
${\mathcal A}$
is a Banach algebra such that
${\mathcal A}^*$
is a von Neumann algebra whose unit
$1$
lies in the spectrum of
${\mathcal A}$
. Let
${\mathbb G}$
be a locally compact quantum group. Then it is easy to see that
$1=1\circ \pi \in \operatorname {sp}(\mathcal {T}_{\triangleright }({\mathbb G}))$
. Now, since
$B(L^{2}(\mathbb {G}))$
is a von Neumann algebra, it follows that
$\mathcal {T}_{\triangleright }({\mathbb G})$
is a Lau algebra. In this section, we are interested to study the relation between the existence of left or right invariant
$1$
-means on
$ \operatorname {WAP}(\mathcal {T}_{\triangleright }({\mathbb G}))$
and on
$\operatorname {WAP}(L^1(\mathbb {G}))$
.
Lemma 4.1 Let
${\mathbb G}$
be a locally compact quantum group. Then
![](https://static.cambridge.org/binary/version/id/urn:cambridge.org:id:binary:20240315121132908-0996:S0008439523000061:S0008439523000061_eqnu32.png?pub-status=live)
Proof Suppose that
$x\in \operatorname {WAP}(\mathcal {T}_{\triangleright }({\mathbb G}))$
and
$w\in \mathcal {T}_{\triangleright }({\mathbb G})$
. Let
$(f_k)_k$
be a bounded sequence in
$L^1(\mathbb {G})$
. For each k, let
$w_k\in \mathcal {T}_{\triangleright }({\mathbb G})$
be a normal extension of
$f_k$
. By weak compactness of the map
$\lambda _x: \mathcal {T}_{\triangleright }({\mathbb G})\rightarrow B(L^{2}(\mathbb {G}))$
, there is a subsequence
$(w_{k_j})$
of
$(w_k)$
such that
$(w_{k_j}\triangleright x)$
converges weakly in
$B(L^{2}(\mathbb {G}))$
to some
$y\in B(L^{2}(\mathbb {G}))$
. It is easy to check that
$(w_{k_j}\triangleright x \triangleright w)$
converges weakly in
$B(L^{2}(\mathbb {G}))$
to
$y \triangleright w$
. Now, let
$m\in L^{\infty }(\mathbb {G})^*$
, and let
$\widetilde {m}\in B(L^{2}(\mathbb {G}))^*$
be a Hahn–Banach extension of m. Since
$B(L^{2}(\mathbb {G}))\triangleright \mathcal {T}_{\triangleright }({\mathbb G})\subseteq L^{\infty }(\mathbb {G})$
, we have
![](https://static.cambridge.org/binary/version/id/urn:cambridge.org:id:binary:20240315121132908-0996:S0008439523000061:S0008439523000061_eqnu33.png?pub-status=live)
This shows that
$x\triangleright w\in \operatorname {WAP}(L^{1}(\mathbb {G}))$
.
Theorem 4.2 Let
${\mathbb G}$
be a locally compact quantum group. Then
$\operatorname {WAP}(L^{1}(\mathbb {G}))$
has a right invariant
$1$
-mean if and only if
$\operatorname {WAP}(\mathcal {T}_{\triangleright }({\mathbb G}))$
has a right invariant
$1$
-mean.
Proof Let m be a right invariant
$1$
-mean on
$\operatorname {WAP}(L^{1}(\mathbb {G}))$
. Define
$\widetilde {m}\in \operatorname {WAP}(\mathcal {T}_{\triangleright }({\mathbb G}))^*$
by
$\langle \widetilde {m}, x\rangle =\langle m, x\triangleright w_0\rangle $
for all
$x\in \operatorname {WAP}(\mathcal {T}_{\triangleright }({\mathbb G}))$
, where
$w_0\in \mathcal {T}_{\triangleright }({\mathbb G})$
with
$\|w_0\|=\langle w_0 ,1\rangle =1$
. Then it is easy to check that
$\langle \widetilde {m}, 1\rangle =1$
. Moreover, we have
![](https://static.cambridge.org/binary/version/id/urn:cambridge.org:id:binary:20240315121132908-0996:S0008439523000061:S0008439523000061_eqnu34.png?pub-status=live)
for all
$w\in \mathcal {T}_{\triangleright }({\mathbb G})$
and
$x\in \operatorname {WAP}(\mathcal {T}_{\triangleright }({\mathbb G}))$
, proving that
$\widetilde {m}$
is a right invariant
$1$
-mean on
$\operatorname {WAP}(\mathcal {T}_{\triangleright }({\mathbb G}))$
.
Conversely, suppose that n is a right invariant
$1$
-mean on
$\operatorname {WAP}(\mathcal {T}_{\triangleright }({\mathbb G}))$
. Since
$\pi : \mathcal {T}_{\triangleright }({\mathbb G})\rightarrow L^{1}(\mathbb {G})$
is a continuous algebra homomorphism, it follows from [Reference Young18, Corollary to Lemma 1] that the map
$\pi ^*$
maps
$\operatorname {WAP}(L^{1}(\mathbb {G}))$
to
$\operatorname {WAP}(\mathcal {T}_{\triangleright }({\mathbb G}))$
. Thus, we can define
$\widetilde {n}\in \operatorname {WAP}(L^{1}(\mathbb {G}))^*$
by
$\widetilde {n}:=n\circ \pi ^*$
. It is easily verified that
$\langle \widetilde {n}, 1\rangle =1$
. For every
$f\in L^1(\mathbb {G})$
and
$x\in \operatorname {WAP}(L^{1}(\mathbb {G}))$
, let
$w\in \mathcal {T}_{\triangleright }({\mathbb G})$
be a normal extension of f. Then we have
![](https://static.cambridge.org/binary/version/id/urn:cambridge.org:id:binary:20240315121132908-0996:S0008439523000061:S0008439523000061_eqnu35.png?pub-status=live)
for all
$w'\in \mathcal {T}_{\triangleright }({\mathbb G})$
. Therefore,
![](https://static.cambridge.org/binary/version/id/urn:cambridge.org:id:binary:20240315121132908-0996:S0008439523000061:S0008439523000061_eqnu36.png?pub-status=live)
That is,
$\widetilde {n}$
is a right invariant
$1$
-mean on
$\operatorname {WAP}(L^{1}(\mathbb {G}))$
.
Before giving the next result, recall that if
${\mathbb G}= L^{\infty }(G)$
for a locally compact group G, then
$\mathcal {T}_{\triangleright }(\mathbb {G})$
is the convolution algebra introduced by Neufang in [Reference Neufang11].
Corollary 4.3 Let G be a locally compact group, and let
${\mathbb G}= L^{\infty }(G)$
. Then
$\operatorname {WAP}(\mathcal {T}_{\triangleright }(\mathbb {G}))$
admits a right invariant
$1$
-mean.
Theorem 4.4 Let
$\mathbb {G}$
be a locally compact quantum group. Then
$\operatorname {WAP}(\mathcal {T}_{\triangleright }({\mathbb G}))$
has a left invariant
$1$
-mean if and only if
$\mathbb {G}$
is trivial.
Proof Let m be a left invariant
$1$
-mean on
$\operatorname {WAP}(\mathcal {T}_{\triangleright }({\mathbb G}))$
. Then for every
$x\in \operatorname {WAP}(\mathcal {T}_{\triangleright }({\mathbb G}))$
, we have
$m\cdot x=\langle m, x\rangle 1$
, by left invariance. Now, consider the map
![](https://static.cambridge.org/binary/version/id/urn:cambridge.org:id:binary:20240315121132908-0996:S0008439523000061:S0008439523000061_eqnu37.png?pub-status=live)
defined by
$E(x)=m\cdot x=\langle m, x\rangle 1$
for all
$x\in \operatorname {WAP}(\mathcal {T}_{\triangleright }({\mathbb G}))$
. Then for every
$\hat {x}\in L^{\infty }(\hat {\mathbb {G}})$
, we have
![](https://static.cambridge.org/binary/version/id/urn:cambridge.org:id:binary:20240315121132908-0996:S0008439523000061:S0008439523000061_eqnu38.png?pub-status=live)
These prove that
$L^{\infty }(\widehat {\mathbb {G}})=E(L^{\infty }(\widehat {\mathbb {G}}))\subseteq \mathbb {C}1$
. Therefore,
$L^{\infty }(\widehat {\mathbb {G}})=\mathbb {C}1$
and so
${\mathbb G}$
is trivial.
Acknowledgment
The authors are grateful to the referee for his/her careful reading of the paper and valuable suggestions.