Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-v2bm5 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-06T06:24:57.694Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Olanzapine plus fluoxetine treatment alters mitochondrial respiratory chain activity in the rat brain

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 June 2014

Fabiano R. Agostinho
Affiliation:
Laboratório de Neurociências and Instituto Nacional de Ciência e Tecnologia Translacional em Medicina (INCT-TM), Programa de Pós-Graduação em Ciências da Saúde, Unidade Acadêmica de Ciências da Saúde, Universidade do Extremo Sul Catarinense, Criciúma, Santa Catarina, Brazil
Gislaine Z. Réus
Affiliation:
Laboratório de Neurociências and Instituto Nacional de Ciência e Tecnologia Translacional em Medicina (INCT-TM), Programa de Pós-Graduação em Ciências da Saúde, Unidade Acadêmica de Ciências da Saúde, Universidade do Extremo Sul Catarinense, Criciúma, Santa Catarina, Brazil
Roberto B. Stringari
Affiliation:
Laboratório de Neurociências and Instituto Nacional de Ciência e Tecnologia Translacional em Medicina (INCT-TM), Programa de Pós-Graduação em Ciências da Saúde, Unidade Acadêmica de Ciências da Saúde, Universidade do Extremo Sul Catarinense, Criciúma, Santa Catarina, Brazil
Karine F. Ribeiro
Affiliation:
Laboratório de Neurociências and Instituto Nacional de Ciência e Tecnologia Translacional em Medicina (INCT-TM), Programa de Pós-Graduação em Ciências da Saúde, Unidade Acadêmica de Ciências da Saúde, Universidade do Extremo Sul Catarinense, Criciúma, Santa Catarina, Brazil
Gabriela K. Ferreira
Affiliation:
Laboratório de Fisiopatologia Experimental and Instituto Nacional de Ciência e Tecnologia Translacional em Medicina (INCT-TM), Programa de Pós-Graduação em Ciências da Saúde, Unidade Acadêmica de Ciências da Saúde, Universidade do Extremo Sul Catarinense, Criciúma, Santa Catarina, Brazil
Isabela C. Jeremias
Affiliation:
Laboratório de Fisiopatologia Experimental and Instituto Nacional de Ciência e Tecnologia Translacional em Medicina (INCT-TM), Programa de Pós-Graduação em Ciências da Saúde, Unidade Acadêmica de Ciências da Saúde, Universidade do Extremo Sul Catarinense, Criciúma, Santa Catarina, Brazil
Giselli Scaini
Affiliation:
Laboratório de Fisiopatologia Experimental and Instituto Nacional de Ciência e Tecnologia Translacional em Medicina (INCT-TM), Programa de Pós-Graduação em Ciências da Saúde, Unidade Acadêmica de Ciências da Saúde, Universidade do Extremo Sul Catarinense, Criciúma, Santa Catarina, Brazil
Gislaine T. Rezin
Affiliation:
Laboratório de Fisiopatologia Experimental and Instituto Nacional de Ciência e Tecnologia Translacional em Medicina (INCT-TM), Programa de Pós-Graduação em Ciências da Saúde, Unidade Acadêmica de Ciências da Saúde, Universidade do Extremo Sul Catarinense, Criciúma, Santa Catarina, Brazil
Emílio L. Streck
Affiliation:
Laboratório de Fisiopatologia Experimental and Instituto Nacional de Ciência e Tecnologia Translacional em Medicina (INCT-TM), Programa de Pós-Graduação em Ciências da Saúde, Unidade Acadêmica de Ciências da Saúde, Universidade do Extremo Sul Catarinense, Criciúma, Santa Catarina, Brazil
João Quevedo*
Affiliation:
Laboratório de Neurociências and Instituto Nacional de Ciência e Tecnologia Translacional em Medicina (INCT-TM), Programa de Pós-Graduação em Ciências da Saúde, Unidade Acadêmica de Ciências da Saúde, Universidade do Extremo Sul Catarinense, Criciúma, Santa Catarina, Brazil
*
Professor João Quevedo, MD, PhD, Laboratório de Neurociências and Instituto Nacional de Ciência e Tecnologia Translacional em Medicina (INCT-TM), Programa de Pós-Graduação em Ciências da Saúde, Unidade Acadêmica de Ciências da Saúde, Universidade do Extremo Sul Catarinense, Criciúma 88806-000, Santa Catarina, Brazil. Tel: +55 48 3443 4817; Fax: +55 48 3431 2736; E-mail: quevedo@unesc.net
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Agostinho FR, Réus GZ, Stringari RB, Ribeiro KF, Ferreira GK, Jeremias IC, Scaini G, Rezin GT, Streck EL, Quevedo J. Olanzapine plus fluoxetine treatment alters mitochondrial respiratory chain activity in the rat brain.

Background: Evidence is emerging for the role of dysfunctional mitochondria in pathophysiology and treatment of mood disorders. In this study, we evaluated the effects of acute and chronic administration of fluoxetine (FLX), olanzapine (OLZ) and the combination of FLX/OLZ on mitochondrial respiratory chain activity in the rat brain.

Methods: For acute treatment, Wistar rats received one single injection of OLZ (3 or 6 mg/kg) and/or FLX (12 or 25 mg/kg) and for chronic treatment, rats received daily injections of OLZ (3 or 6 mg/kg) and/or FLX (12 or 25 mg/kg) for 28 days and we evaluated the activity of mitochondrial respiratory chain complexes I, II, II–III and IV in prefrontal cortex, hippocampus and striatum.

Results: Our results showed that both acute and chronic treatments with FLX and OLZ alone or in combination altered respiratory chain complexes activity in the rat brain, but in combination we observed larger alterations.

Conclusions: Finally, these findings further support the hypothesis that metabolism energy could be involved in the treatment with antipsychotics and antidepressants in combination to mood disorders.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2011

Significant outcomes

  1. Effects of FLX and OLZ alone or in combination on mitochondrial respiratory chain.

  2. Acute and chronic treatment of FLX and OLZ alone or in combination altered respiratory chain complexes activity.

  3. In combination, FLX and OLZ caused larger alterations.

Limitations

  • The results did not follow a pattern. Sometimes FLX and/or OLZ increased and sometimes decreased the activity of the complexes.

Introduction

Mood disorders are among the most prevalent forms of mental illness. Severe forms of depression affect 2–5% of the US population, and up to 20% suffer from milder forms of the illness. Another roughly 1–2% are afflicted by bipolar disorder (BD) or its less severe variants (Reference Nelson, Hall and Forchuk1,Reference Konradi, Eaton, MacDonald, Walsh, Benes and Heckers2) and are associated with higher rates of suicide and work loss (Reference Belmaker3Reference Kupfer5).

Tissues with high energy demands, such as the brain, contain a large number of mitochondria and are therefore more susceptible to reduction of the aerobic metabolism (Reference Boekema and Braun6) Mitochondrial disease results from a malfunction in biochemical cascade and the damage to the mitochondrial electron transport chain has been suggested to be an important factor in the pathogenesis of a range of neuropsychiatries disorders, such as BD, depression and schizophrenia (Reference Fattal, Budur, Vaughan and Franco7,Reference Prabakaran, Swatton and Ryan8). Several studies have shown that the abnormalities in energy metabolism lead to cellular degeneration (Reference Calabrese, Scapagnini, Giuffrida-Stella, Bates and Clark9). This effect may occur because when the mitochondrial dysfunction is severe it can lead to cell death by apoptosis or necrosis (Reference Armstrong10,Reference Schapira11). In fact, mitochondria are involved in essential processes, such as apoptosis and calcium homeostasis (Reference Gur, Resnick, Alavi, Carrof, Kushner and Reivch12Reference Hung, Ho and Chang14), which are involved in cell death.

Mitochondria are intracellular organelles that play a crucial role in ATP production (Reference Calabrese, Scapagnini, Giuffrida-Stella, Bates and Clark9). Most cell energy is obtained through oxidative phosphorylation, a process requiring the action of various respiratory enzyme complexes located in a special structure of the inner mitochondrial membrane, the mitochondrial respiratory chain (Reference Horn and Barrientos15). In most organisms, the mitochondrial respiratory chain is composed of four complexes, where the electron transport couples with translocation of protons from the mitochondrial matrix to the intermembrane space. The generated proton gradient is used by ATP synthase to catalyse the formation of ATP by the phosphorylation of ADP (Reference Fattal, Budur, Vaughan and Franco7,Reference Madrigal, Olivenza and Moro16).

A fixed combination of antipsychotic and antidepressant drugs was widely used in medicine and, at one time, was common in psychiatry. A generation ago, combinations of antidepressants with either antipsychotics [e.g. amitriptyline and perphenazine (Etrafon™; Schering–Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals, Berlin, Germany and Triavil™; Merck & Company Inc., Whitehouse Station, NJ, USA)] or benzodiazepines [e.g. amitriptyline and chlordiazepoxide (Limbitrol™; Valeant Pharmaceuticals International, USA/Valeant Farmacêutica do Brasil, SP, Brazil)] were widely used by both psychiatrists and other medical practitioners (Reference Shelton17). Recently, a fixed combination of the antipsychotic drug olanzapine (OLZ) and the antidepressant fluoxetine (FLX) (Symbyax™; Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, IN, USA) has been introduced for the treatment of BD (Reference Belmaker3,Reference Tohen, Vieta and Calabrese18). In a controlled study by Shelton et al. (Reference Shelton, Tollefson and Tohen19), subjects with treatment-resistant depression received OLZ alone, FLX alone or a combination of both; the combination was associated with significantly greater and faster improvement than was either drug alone. Although there is a clear clinical benefit from this combination, the precise neural mechanisms responsible for its efficacy are not clearly understood. Therefore, it is important to investigate the mechanisms of action of this combination in order to not only better understand the aetiology of the clinical syndromes, but also to eventually facilitate the development of improved drugs to treat them (Reference Ustun, Ayuso-Mateos, Chatterji, Mathers and Murray4,Reference Rezin, Cardoso and Gonçalves20).

Considering the effects of OLZ, FLX and these combinations on brain energy metabolism are still unknown, we evaluated the effects of these drugs on mitochondrial respiratory chain in the rat prefrontal cortex, hippocampus and striatum. It is important to note that we chose the prefrontal cortex, hippocampus and striatum in this study because these brain areas are implicated in mood disorders (Reference Pittenger and Duman21,Reference Strakowski, Delbello and Adler22).

Material and methods

Animals

Male adult Wistar rats (60 days old) were obtained from UNESC (Universidade do Extremo Sul Catarinense, Criciúma, SC, Brazil) breeding colony. They were housed five per cage with food and water available ad libitum and were maintained on a 12-h light/dark cycle (lights on at 7:00 h). All experimental procedures involving animals were performed in accordance with the NIH Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals and the Brazilian Society for Neuroscience and Behavior (SBNeC) recommendations for animal care and with approval by local Ethics Committee under protocol number 510/2006.

Drugs and treatments

OLZ (Zyprexa™) and FLX (Prozac™) were provided from Eli Lilly do Brasil Ltda, São Paulo, Brazil. Animals received daily intraperitoneal injections of OLZ (3 or 6 mg/kg), FLX (12 or 25 mg/kg) or combination of both drugs for 28 days in two protocols of the chronic model (A and B) and in the acute model for 1 day. Protocols and doses of drugs were performed in accordance with previous studies (Reference Agostinho, Scaini and Ferreira23,Reference Agostinho, Réus and Stringari24). All the drugs were dissolved in saline (0.9% NaCl) solution (vehicle). Control animals received saline (0.9% NaCl; 1.0 ml/kg). In the acute protocol, after the single injection, the animals were killed 2 h later by decapitation, and the prefrontal cortex, hippocampus and striatum were immediately removed. Similarly, in the chronic protocols, the animals were killed 2 (A) and 24 (B) h after the last injection, and the same areas were removed. The analysis was performed at different times of decapitation (2 and 24 h) after the last injection to be sure that the effects of the studied parameters were because of a chronic effect (Reference Agostinho, Scaini and Ferreira23,Reference Agostinho, Réus and Stringari24). After that, the activity of mitochondrial respiratory chain was measured (n = 5 each).

Tissue and homogenate preparation

Hippocampus, striatum and prefrontal cortex were homogenised (1:10, w/v) in SETH (sucrose, EDTA, tris and heparin) buffer at pH 7.4 (250 mM sucrose, 2 mM ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid, 10 mM Trizma base and 50 IU/ml heparin). The homogenates were centrifuged at 800g for 10 min and the supernatants kept at −70 °C until used for mitochondrial respiratory chain activity determination. The maximal period between homogenate preparation and enzyme analysis was always <5 days. Protein content was determined by the method described by Lowry et al. (Reference Lowry, Rosebough, Farr and Randall25) using bovine serum albumin as standard.

Respiratory chain enzyme activities

NADH dehydrogenase (complex I) was evaluated by the method described by Cassina and Radi (Reference Cassina and Radi26) with the rate of NADH-dependent ferricyanide reduction at 420 nm. The activities of succinate-2,6-dichloroindophenol (DCIP) oxidoreductase (complex II) and succinate:cytochrome c oxidoreductase (complex II–III) were determined by the method described by Fischer et al. (Reference Fischer, Ruitenbeek and Berden27). Complex II activity was measured by following the decrease in absorbance due to the reduction in 2,6-DCIP at 600 nm. Complex II–III activity was measured by cytochrome c reduction from succinate at 550 nm. The activity of cytochrome c oxidase (complex IV) was assayed according to the method described by Rustin et al. (Reference Rustin, Chretien and Bourgeron28) and measured by following the decrease in absorbance due to the oxidation of previously reduced cytochrome c at 550 nm. The activities of the mitochondrial respiratory chain complexes were calculated as nmol/min mg protein.

Statistical analysis

All data are presented as mean ± SEM (standard error of the mean). Differences among experimental groups in the assessment of mitochondrial respiratory chain activity were determined by one-way ANOVA, followed by Tukey post hoc test when ANOVA was significant; p < 0.05 was considered to be statistically significant.

Results

As depicted in Fig. 1a, complex I activity increased in the prefrontal cortex of rats treated acutely with OLZ 6 mg/kg and OLZ 3 mg/kg plus FLX 12 mg/kg (Fig. 1a; F=35.63; p<0.05); in the hippocampus complex I activity increased with FLX 25 mg/kg (Fig. 1a; F = 180.27; p < 0.05); in the striatum complex I activity increased with OLZ 6 mg/kg (Fig. 1a; F = 3.69; p < 0.05). The complex II activity increased in prefrontal cortex (Fig. 1b; F = 2.28; p < 0.05) and hippocampus (Fig. 1b; F = 36.43; p < 0.05) after acute treatment with OLZ 6 mg/kg alone. The complex II–III activity increased in the prefrontal cortex (Fig. 1c; F = 17.03; p < 0.05) with OLZ 3 mg/kg plus FLX 25 mg/kg and OLZ 6 mg/kg plus FLX 25 mg/kg, in the hippocampus (Fig. 1c; F = 6.92; p < 0.05) with OLZ 3 mg/kg plus FLX 25 mg/kg and OLZ 6 mg/kg plus FLX 25 mg/kg and in the striatum (Fig. 1c; F = 15.71; p < 0.05) with OLZ 3 mg/kg plus FLX 12 or 25 mg/kg and OLZ 6 mg/kg plus FLX 25 mg/kg. After acute treatment, the complex IV activity increased in the prefrontal cortex (Fig. 1d; F = 5.7; p < 0.05) with OLZ 3 mg/kg plus FLX 25 mg/kg and OLZ 6 mg/kg plus FLX 12 or 25 mg/kg and in the striatum (Fig. 1d; F = 8.68; p < 0.05) with OLZ 3 mg/kg plus FLX 12 or 25 mg/kg. In the chronic treatment, when the animals were killed 2 h after the last injection (Fig. 2), there was an increase in complex I activity in the striatum after OLZ 6 mg/kg and FLX 25 mg/kg in combination (Fig. 2a; F=4.02; p < 0.05). The complex II activity decreased in the striatum after chronic treatment with OLZ 6 mg/kg plus FLX 12 mg/kg (Fig. 2b; F = 1.87; p < 0.05) and it was not altered in the prefrontal cortex (Fig. 2b; F=0.92; p>0.05) and hippocampus (Fig. 2b; F = 1.93; p > 0.05). The complex II–III activity increased in the striatum with OLZ 3 mg/kg alone compared to the control group (Fig. 2c; F=7.81; p < 0.05) and it was not altered in the prefrontal cortex (Fig. 2c; F=1.87; p>0.05) and hippocampus (Fig. 2c; F=1.91; p>0.05). The complex IV activity did not alter in the prefrontal cortex (Fig. 2d; F=0.36; p>0.05) and striatum (Fig. 2d; F=3.52; p<0.05) compared to the control group; in contrast, in the hippocampus, the complex IV activity increased after treatment with OLZ 6 mg/kg and FLX 25 mg/kg in combination compared to the control group (Fig. 2d; F=2.4; p<0.05).

Fig. 1. Effects of the acute administration of olanzapine and fluoxetine on the complex I (a), II (b), II–III (c) and IV (d) activities in the rat prefrontal cortex, hippocampus and striatum. Bars represent means ± SEM (standard error of the mean). *p < 0.05 versus saline according to ANOVA followed by Tukey post hoc test.

Fig. 2. Effects of the chronic administration of olanzapine and fluoxetine on the complex I (a), II (b), II–III (c) and IV (d) activities in the rat prefrontal cortex, hippocampus and striatum. The animals were killed 2 h after the last administration of the drugs. Bars represent means ± SEM (standard error of the mean). *p < 0.05 versus saline according to ANOVA followed by Tukey post hoc test.

In the chronic treatment, when the animals were killed 24 h after the last injection (Fig. 3), we showed that complex I activity decreased in the prefrontal cortex with FLX 12 mg/kg alone compared to the control group (Fig. 3a; F = 3.9; p < 0.05); however, the complex I activity did not alter in hippocampus (Fig. 3a; F = 2.21; p > 0.05) and striatum (Fig. 3a; F = 1.15; p > 0.05). The complex II activity (Fig. 2b) did not alter in the prefrontal cortex (F = 3.45), hippocampus (F = 4.83) and striatum (F = 1.39) compared to the control group. Treatment with FLX 25 mg/kg alone decreased complex II–III activity in the striatum compared to the control group (Fig. 3c; F = 4.99; p < 0.05). In the hippocampus (Fig. 3c; F = 3.42; p > 0.05) and prefrontal cortex (Fig. 3c; F = 2.18; p > 0.05), we did not observe alteration in the complex II–III activity. Figure 3d shows that complex IV activity did not alter in the prefrontal cortex (F = 2.13). In the striatum, the complex IV activity increased after treatment with OLZ 6 mg/kg and FLX 12 mg/kg in combination compared to the control group (F=8.18; p<0.05). In contrast, in the hippocampus the complex IV activity decreased after treatment with OLZ 3 and 6 mg/kg alone, as with FLX 12 and 25 mg/kg alone. In addition, OLZ 3 mg/kg plus FLX 12 or 25 mg/kg also decreased the complex IV activity compared to the control group (F = 6.87; p < 0.05).

Fig. 3. Effects of the chronic administration of olanzapine and fluoxetine on the complex I (a), II (b), II-III (c) and IV (d) activities in the rat prefrontal cortex, hippocampus and striatum. The animals were killed 24 h after the last administration of the drugs. Bars represent means ± SEM (standard error of the mean). *p < 0.05 versus saline according to ANOVA followed by Tukey post hoc test.

Discussion

In this study, we evaluated the effects of the antipsychotic OLZ and the antidepressant FLX (alone or in combination) on mitochondrial respiratory chain activity in the rat brain. We showed that both acute and chronic treatments with FLX and OLZ alone or in combination altered respiratory chain complex activity in the rat brain, but in combination we observed larger alterations. We showed that these alterations were related to treatment regime, complex, brain area and drug concentration.

Recent studies from our group showed that acute administration of FLX inhibited creatine kinase in the rat brain. This study also showed that chronic treatment, when the animals were killed 2 h after the last injection, showed a decrease in the creatine kinase activity after FLX administration, alone or in combination with OLZ. In contrast, when the animals were killed 24 h after the last injection we did not observe alterations in the enzyme (Reference Agostinho, Scaini and Ferreira23). In addition, acute, but not chronic treatment with FLX and OLZ alone or in combination increased citrate synthase activity in the rat brain (Reference Agostinho, Réus and Stringari24). Creatine kinase works as a buffering system of cellular ATP levels and citrate synthase has been used as a quantitative enzyme marker for the presence of intact mitochondria (Reference Marco, Pestana, Sebastian and Sols29). Both enzymes play an important role in brain energy metabolism. In fact, several studies have been appointed to mitochondrial abnormalities in a number of disorders, including depression, BD and schizophrenia (Reference Fattal, Budur, Vaughan and Franco7,Reference Ben-Shachar and Karry30,Reference Quiroz, Gray, Kato and Manji31).

Studies have identified that some brain regions from BD patients presented a decreased energy metabolism and abnormalities in mitochondrial DNA (Reference Iwamoto, Bundo and Kato32,Reference Kato33). Moreover, reductions of mitochondrial respiratory chain were found in patients with depression, schizophrenia and BD (Reference Ben-Shachar and Karry30,Reference Andreazza, Shao, Wang and Young34). Additionally, animal models evaluating the molecular pharmacology of mood stabilising drugs have implicated mitochondrial energy metabolism as a target for these drugs (Reference Corrêa, Amboni and Assis35,Reference Wang, Shao, Sun and Young36).

Dror et al. (Reference Dror, Klein and Karry37) showed alteration in complex I activity and in levels of mRNA and protein of the 24- and 51-kDa iron–sulphur flavoprotein subunits of the complex from platelets of schizophrenia patients, suggesting that these alterations may result in abnormal neural transmission, synaptic plasticity and connectivity, leading to abnormal behavioural symptoms in schizophrenia. Moreover, another study has shown abnormalities in energy metabolism in the basal ganglia of chronic schizophrenics (Reference Prince, Blennow, Gottfries, Karlsson and Oreland38). In addition, Iwamoto et al. (Reference Iwamoto, Bundo and Kato32) showed mitochondrial dysfunction in postmortem brains of schizophrenic patients; however, this dysfunction was due to the patients' medication, especially antipsychotics. Additionally, a study showed that OLZ, clozapine and haloperidol inhibited succinate dehydrogenase (an important enzyme of the Krebs cycle and part of the mitochondrial respiratory chain as an electron-transferring protein); however, aripiprazole antipsychotic increased the enzyme in the rat brain (Reference Streck, Rezin, Barbosa, Assis, Grandi and Quevedo39). Several studies have shown that antipsychotic drugs inhibited the respiratory electron transport chain (40–43). In this study, we showed that OLZ alone or in combination with FLX inhibited the complex IV activity in the hippocampus when the animals were killed 24 h after the last injection, and OLZ in combination with FLX inhibited the complex II activity in the striatum when the animals were killed 2 h after the last injection; however, in most cases, OLZ alone or in combination acted to increase the complex respiratory chain in the rat brain.

The effects of OLZ and FLX found in this study could be also related to oxidative stress. In fact, mitochondria can produce an excess of reactive oxygen species (ROS), which will cause oxidative damage to cellular constituents such as membrane lipids and proteins (Reference Wu, Wu, Lee and Wei44). In addition, mtDNA mutations in elevated production of ROS in turn proved to increase the number of mtDNA mutations (Reference Płoszaj, Robaszkiewicz and Witas45). Several studies have generally suggested a compromised oxidative stress in psychiatric disorders such as BD, depression and schizophrenia (Reference Padurariu, Ciobica, Dobrin and Stefanescu46Reference Valvassori, Petronilho and Réus48). Additionally, chronic exposure to antipsychotics, haloperidol and clozapine, but not OLZ, caused changes in the activities of antioxidant enzymes and oxidative damage in the rat brain (Reference Polydoro, Schröder and Lima49,Reference Reinke, Martins, Lima, Moreira, Dal-Pizzol and Quevedo50). Researchers have reported that some side effects of antipsychotics are associated with oxidative stress (Reference Lohr, Cadet and Lohr51,Reference Peet, Laugharne and Rangarajan52) and metabolism impairment (Reference Andreassen, Ferrante, Beal and Jorgensen53). Recently, a study from our group showed that OLZ and FLX treatment inhibited creatine kinase activity (Reference Agostinho, Scaini and Ferreira23), suggesting that inhibition of enzyme may be associated with the occurrence of some side effects of OLZ and FLX. However, OLZ exerted antioxidant effects through modulating ROS levels, superoxide dismutase activity and Bax expression to provide protective effects against N-methyl-4-phenylpyridinium-induced oxidative stress in PC12 cells (Reference Park, Lee and Lee54). FLX has also shown an antioxidant effect (Reference Gałecki, Szemraj, Bieńkiewicz, Florkowski and Gałecka55Reference Chung, Kim and Park57).

Reductions in mRNA and proteins of complex I subunits NADH dehydrogenase ubiquinone flavoprotein (NDUFV1), NADH–ubiquinone oxidoreductase flavoprotein gene (NDUFV2) and NADH dehydrogenase (ubiquinone) Fe-S protein 1(NDUFS1) have been shown in the cerebellum postmortem from patients with depression (Reference Ben-Shachar and Karry30). Many animal models of mania and depression have revealed alterations in metabolism energy. Studies from our group showed reduced creatine kinase and citrate synthase activity in brain of rats submitted to the animal model of mania (Reference Corrêa, Amboni and Assis35,Reference Streck, Amboni and Scaini58) Moreover, in another study from our group, it was shown that antidepressants imipramine (Reference Assis, Rezin and Comim59) and paroxetine (Reference Santos, Scaini and Rezin60) increased creatine kinase activity in the rat brain, suggesting that the modulation of energy metabolism by antidepressants could be an important mechanism of action of these drugs. Nevertheless, our group also showed that mitochondrial respiratory chain complexes I, II–III and IV were inhibited after chronic mild stress in the cerebral cortex and cerebellum (Reference Rezin, Gonçalves and Daufenbach61). Madrigal et al. (Reference Madrigal, Olivenza and Moro16) also reported that complexes I–III and II–III of mitochondrial respiratory chain were inhibited in rat brains after chronic stress (immobilisation for 6 h during 21 days). Hroudova and Fisar (Reference Hroudova and Fisar62) showed that several antidepressant drugs inhibited complexes I and IV of the mitochondrial respiratory chain, suggesting that in pathophysiology of mood disorders therapeutic effects of antidepressant could have changes in energetic metabolism of cells determined by mitochondria.

In clinical practice, atypical antipsychotic drugs in combination with antidepressant drugs have been used as a strategy to treat (Reference Hirschfeld, Montgomery and Aguglia63) treatment-resistant depression (Reference Nelson, Hall and Forchuk1,Reference Fava64,Reference Morishita65) and psychotic depression (Reference Schatzberg66). In an elegant controlled study, Matthews et al. (Reference Matthews, Bottonari and Polania67) showed that subjects with treatment-resistant depression received OLZ and FLX alone or a combination of both; the combination was associated with significantly greater and faster improvement than was either drug alone. In this study, we also showed greater effects of OLZ and FLX in combination under metabolism energy parameters, antidepressant FLX and antipsychotic OLZ alone or in combination increased or decreased mitochondrial respiratory chain, dependent on treatment regime, enzymatic complex, brain area and drug concentration. The reason for this different alteration in this study is unclear, but could be related to desensitisation of the effects of repeated OLZ and FLX administration or to the adaptation mechanism of mitochondria. The differences of OLZ and FLX found in these findings could be related to brain distribution of the drugs or differences in the toxicity of its metabolites.

In conclusion, taking together the present findings and evidence from the literature, we hypothesise that FLX and OLZ in combination could be involved in mitochondrial function, which is altered in several mood disorders. However, it remains to be seen if effects of the combination of drugs on the mitochondrial respiratory chain are related to the therapeutic or side effects of pharmacotherapy.

Acknowledgements

This study was supported in part by grants from ‘Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico' (CNPq-Brazil – JQ, ELS), the Instituto Cérebro e Mente (JQ) and UNESC (JQ and ELS). JQ and ELS are recipients of CNPq (Brazil) Productivity fellowships. GZR is holder of an FAPESC studentship.

References

1.Nelson, G, Hall, GB, Forchuk, C.Current and preferred housing of psychiatric consumers/survivors. Can J Commun Ment Health 2003;22:519.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
2.Konradi, C, Eaton, M, MacDonald, ML, Walsh, J, Benes, FM, Heckers, S.Molecular evidence for mitochondrial dysfunction in bipolar disorder. Arch Gen Psychiatry 2004; 61:300308.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
3.Belmaker, RH.Bipolar disorder. N Engl J Med 2004;351: 476486.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
4.Ustun, TB, Ayuso-Mateos, JL, Chatterji, S, Mathers, C, Murray, CJ.Global burden of depressive disorders in the year 2000. Br J Psychiatry 2004;84:386392.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5.Kupfer, DJ.The increasing medical burden in bipolar disorder. JAMA 2005;293:25282530.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
6.Boekema, EJ, Braun, HP.Supramolecular structure of the mitochondrial oxidative phosphorylation system. J Biol Chem 2007;282:14.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
7.Fattal, O, Budur, K, Vaughan, AJ, Franco, K.Review of the literature on major mental disorders in adult patients with mitochondrial diseases. Psychosomatics 2006;47:17.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
8.Prabakaran, S, Swatton, JE, Ryan, MM et al. Mitochondrial dysfunction in schizophrenia: evidence for compromised brain metabolism and oxidative stress. Mol Psychiatry 2004;9:684687.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
9.Calabrese, V, Scapagnini, G, Giuffrida-Stella, AM, Bates, TE, Clark, JB.Mitochondrial involvement in brain function and dysfunction: relevance to aging, neurodegenerative disorders and longevity. Neurochem Res 2001;26: 739764.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
10.Armstrong, JS.The role of the mitochondrial permeability transition in cell death. Mitochondrion 2006;6:225234.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
11.Schapira, AH.Mitochondrial disease. Lancet 2006;368: 7082.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
12.Gur, RE, Resnick, SM, Alavi, A, Carrof, S, Kushner, M, Reivch, M.Regional brain function in schizophrenia II: repeated evaluation with positron emission tomography. Arch Gen Psychiatry 1987;44:126129.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
13.Castanier, C, Arnoult, D.Mitochondrial dynamics apoptosis. Med Sci 2010;26:830835.Google ScholarPubMed
14.Hung, CH, Ho, YS, Chang, RC.Modulation of mitochondrial calcium as a pharmacological target for Alzheimer's disease. Ageing Res Rev 2010;9:447456.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
15.Horn, D, Barrientos, A.Mitochondrial copper metabolism and delivery to cytochrome c oxidase. IUBMB Life 2008;60:421429.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
16.Madrigal, JLM, Olivenza, R, Moro, MA et al. Glutathione depletion, lipid peroxidation and mitochondrial dysfunction are induced by chronic stress in rat brain. Neuropsychopharmacology 2001;24:420429.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
17.Shelton, RC.The return of fixed combinations in psychiatry: fluoxetine and olanzapine combination. Ther Clin Risk Manag 2006;2:187192.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
18.Tohen, M, Vieta, E, Calabrese, J.Efficacy of olanzapine and olanzapine-fluoxetine combination in the treatment of bipolar I depression. Arch Gen Psychiatry 2004;60: 10791088.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
19.Shelton, RC, Tollefson, GD, Tohen, M et al. A novel augmentation strategy for treating resistant major depression. Am J Psychiatry 2001;158:131134.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
20.Rezin, GT, Cardoso, MR, Gonçalves, CL et al. Inhibition of mitochondrial respiratory chain in brain of rats subjected to an experimental model of depression. Neurochem Int 2008;53:395400.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
21.Pittenger, C, Duman, RS.Stress, depression, and neuroplasticity: a convergence of mechanisms. Neuropsychopharmacology 2008;33:88109.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
22.Strakowski, SM, Delbello, MP, Adler, CM.The functional neuroanatomy of bipolar disorder: a review of neuroimaging findings. Mol Psychiatry 2005;10:105116.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
23.Agostinho, FR, Scaini, G, Ferreira, GK et al. Effects of olanzapine, fluoxetine and olanzapine/fluoxetine on creatine kinase activity in rat brain. Brain Res Bull 2009;80: 337340.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
24.Agostinho, FR, Réus, GZ, Stringari, RB et al. Treatment with olanzapine, fluoxetine and olanzapine/fluoxetine alters citrate synthase activity in rat brain. Neurosci Lett 2011;487: 278281.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
25.Lowry, OH, Rosebough, NG, Farr, AL, Randall, RJ.Protein measurement with the Folin phenol reagent. J Biol Chem 1951;193:265275.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
26.Cassina, A, Radi, R.Differential inhibitory action of nitric oxide and peroxynitrite on mitochondrial electron transport. Arch Biochem Biophys 1996;328:309316.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
27.Fischer, JC, Ruitenbeek, W, Berden, JA et al. Differential investigation of the capacity of succinate oxidation in human skeletal muscle. Clin Chim Acta 1995;153:2326.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
28.Rustin, P, Chretien, D, Bourgeron, T et al. Biochemical and molecular investigations in respiratory chain deficiencies. Clin Chim Acta 1994;228:3551.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
29.Marco, R, Pestana, A, Sebastian, J, Sols, A.Oxaloacetate metabolic crossroads in liver. Enzyme compartmentation and regulation of gluconeogenesis. Mol Cell Biochem. 1974;3:5370.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
30.Ben-Shachar, D, Karry, R.Neuroanatomical pattern of mitochondrial complex I pathology varies between schizophrenia, bipolar disorder and major depression. PLoS One 2008;3:3676.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
31.Quiroz, JA, Gray, AN, Kato, T, Manji, HK.Mitochondrially mediated plasticity in the pathophysiology and treatment of bipolar disorder. Neuropsychopharmacology 2008; 33:25512565.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
32.Iwamoto, K, Bundo, M, Kato, T.Altered expression of mitochondria-related genes in postmortem brains of patients with bipolar disorder or schizophrenia, as revealed by large-scale DNA microarray analysis. Hum Mol Genet 2005;14: 241253.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
33.Kato, T.Mitochondrial dysfunction in bipolar disorder: from 31P-magnetic resonance spectroscopic findings to their molecular mechanisms. Int Rev Neurobiol 2005;63:2140.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
34.Andreazza, AC, Shao, L, Wang, JF, Young, LT.Mitochondrial complex I activity and oxidative damage to mitochondrial proteins in the prefrontal cortex of patients with bipolar disorder. Arch Gen Psychiatry 2010;67: 360368.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
35.Corrêa, C, Amboni, G, Assis, LC et al. Effects of lithium and valproate on hippocampus citrate synthase activity in an animal model of mania. Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry 2007;31:887891.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
36.Wang, FJ, Shao, L, Sun, X, Young, LT.Glutathione S-transferase is a novel target for mood stabilizing drugs in primary cultured neuron. J Neurochem 2004;88:14771484.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
37.Dror, E, Klein, R, Karry, A et al. State-dependent alterations in mitochondrial complex I activity in platelets: a potential peripheral marker for schizophrenia. Mol Psychiatry 2002;7:9951001.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
38.Prince, JA, Blennow, K, Gottfries, CG, Karlsson, I, Oreland, L.Mitochondrial function is differentially altered in the basal ganglia of chronic schizophrenics. Europsychopharmacology 1999;21:372379.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
39.Streck, EL, Rezin, GT, Barbosa, LM, Assis, LC, Grandi, E, Quevedo, J.Effect of antipsychotics on succinate dehydrogenase and cytochrome oxidase activities in rat brain. Naunyn Schmiedebergs Arch Pharmacol 2007;376:127133.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
40.Burkhardt, C, Kelly, JP, Lim, YH, Filley, CM, Parker, WDNeuroleptic medications inhibit complex I of the electron transport chain. Ann Neurol 1993;33:512517.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
41.Modica-Napolitano, JS, Lagace, CJ, Brennan, WA, Aprille, JR.Differential effects of typical and atypical neuroleptics on mitochondrial function in vitro. Arch Pharm Res 2003;26:951–559.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
42.Maurer, I, Moller, HJ.Inhibition of complex I by neuroleptics in normal human brain cortex parallels the extrapyramidal toxicity of neuroleptics. Mol Cell Biochem 1997;174:255259.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
43.Ji, B, La, Y, Gao, L et al. A comparative proteomics analysis of rat mitochondria from the cerebral cortex and hippocampus in response to antipsychotic medications. J Proteome Res 2009;8:36333641.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
44.Wu, Y, Wu, S, Lee, W, Wei, Y.Mitochondrial respiratory dysfunction-elicited oxidative stress and posttranslational protein modification in mitochondrial diseases. Ann N Y Acad Sci 2010;1201:147156.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
45.Płoszaj, T, Robaszkiewicz, A, Witas, H.Oxidative damage of mitochondrial DNA: the result or consequence of enhanced generation of reactive oxygen species. Postepy Biochem 2010;56:139146.Google ScholarPubMed
46.Padurariu, M, Ciobica, A, Dobrin, I, Stefanescu, C.Evaluation of antioxidant enzymes activities and lipid peroxidation in schizophrenic patients treated with typical and atypical antipsychotics. Neurosci Lett 2010;479: 317320.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
47.Réus, GZ, Stringari, RB, Souza, B et al. Harmine and imipramine promote antioxidant activities in prefrontal cortex and hippocampus. Oxid Med Cell Longev 2010;3: 325331.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
48.Valvassori, SS, Petronilho, FC, Réus, GZ et al. Effect of N-acetylcysteine and/or deferoxamine on oxidative stress and hyperactivity in an animal model of mania. Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry 2008;32:10641068.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
49.Polydoro, M, Schröder, N, Lima, MN et al. Haloperidol- and clozapine-induced oxidative stress in the rat brain. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 2004;78:751756.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
50.Reinke, A, Martins, MR, Lima, MS, Moreira, JC, Dal-Pizzol, F, Quevedo, J.Haloperidol and clozapine, but not olanzapine, induces oxidative stress in rat brain. Neurosci Lett 2004;372:157160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
51.Lohr, JB, Cadet, JL, Lohr, MA et al. Vitamin E in the treatment of tardive dyskinesia: the possible involvement of free radical mechanisms. Schizophr Bull 1988;14:291296.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
52.Peet, M, Laugharne, J, Rangarajan, N.Tardive dyskinesia, lipid peroxidation, and sustained amelioration with vitamin E treatment. Int Clin Psychopharmacol 1993;8: 151153.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
53.Andreassen, OA, Ferrante, RJ, Beal, MF, Jorgensen, HA.Oral dyskinesias and striatal lesions in rats after long-term co-treatment with haloperidol and 3-nitropropionic acid. Neuroscience 1998;87:639648.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
54.Park, SW, Lee, CH, Lee, JG et al. Protective effects of atypical antipsychotic drugs against MPP+-induced oxidative stress in PC12 cells. Neurosci Res 2011;69:283290.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
55.Gałecki, P, Szemraj, J, Bieńkiewicz, M, Florkowski, A, Gałecka, E.Lipid peroxidation and antioxidant protection in patients during acute depressive episodes and in remission after fluoxetine treatment. Pharmacol Rep 2009;61: 436447.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
56.Kirkova, M, Tzvetanova, E, Vircheva, S, Zamfirova, R, Grygier, B, Kubera, M.Antioxidant activity of fluoxetine: studies in mice melanoma model. Cell Biochem Funct 2010; 28:497502.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
57.Chung, YC, Kim, SR, Park, JY et al. Fluoxetine prevents MPTP-induced loss of dopaminergic neurons by inhibiting microglial activation. Neuropharmacology 2011;60: 963974.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
58.Streck, EL, Amboni, G, Scaini, G et al. Brain creatine kinase activity in an animal model of mania. Life Sci 2008; 82:424429.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
59.Assis, IC, Rezin, GT, Comim, CM et al. Effect of acute administration of ketamine and imipramine on creatine kinase activity in the brain of rats. Rev Bras Psiquiatr 2009;31:247252.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
60.Santos, PM, Scaini, G, Rezin, GT et al. Brain creatine kinase activity is increased by chronic administration of paroxetine. Brain Res Bull 2009;80:327330.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
61.Rezin, GT, Gonçalves, CL, Daufenbach, JF et al. Acute administration of ketamine reverses the inhibition of mitochondrial respiratory chain induced by chronic mild stress. Brain Res Bull 2009;79:418421.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
62.Hroudova, J, Fisar, Z.Activities of respiratory chain complexes and citrate synthase influenced by pharmacologically different antidepressants and mood stabilizers. Neuro Endocrinol Lett 2010;31:336342.Google ScholarPubMed
63.Hirschfeld, RM, Montgomery, SA, Aguglia, E.Partial response and nonresponse to antidepressant therapy: current approaches and treatment options. J Clin Psychiatry 2002;63:826837.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
64.Fava, M.New approaches to the treatment of refractory depression. J Clin Psychiatry 2000;61:2632.Google Scholar
65.Morishita, S.Clonazepam as a therapeutic adjunct to improve the management of depression: a brief review. Hum Psychopharmacol 2009;24:191198.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
66.Schatzberg, AF.New approaches to managing psychotic depression. J Clin Psychiatry 2003;64:1923.Google ScholarPubMed
67.Matthews, JD, Bottonari, KA, Polania, LM.An open study of olanzapine and fluoxetine for psychotic major depressive disorder: interim analyses. J Clin Psychiatry 2002;63:11641170.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Figure 0

Fig. 1. Effects of the acute administration of olanzapine and fluoxetine on the complex I (a), II (b), II–III (c) and IV (d) activities in the rat prefrontal cortex, hippocampus and striatum. Bars represent means ± SEM (standard error of the mean). *p < 0.05 versus saline according to ANOVA followed by Tukey post hoc test.

Figure 1

Fig. 2. Effects of the chronic administration of olanzapine and fluoxetine on the complex I (a), II (b), II–III (c) and IV (d) activities in the rat prefrontal cortex, hippocampus and striatum. The animals were killed 2 h after the last administration of the drugs. Bars represent means ± SEM (standard error of the mean). *p < 0.05 versus saline according to ANOVA followed by Tukey post hoc test.

Figure 2

Fig. 3. Effects of the chronic administration of olanzapine and fluoxetine on the complex I (a), II (b), II-III (c) and IV (d) activities in the rat prefrontal cortex, hippocampus and striatum. The animals were killed 24 h after the last administration of the drugs. Bars represent means ± SEM (standard error of the mean). *p < 0.05 versus saline according to ANOVA followed by Tukey post hoc test.