Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-mzp66 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-11T09:10:08.205Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Using big data to map the relationship between time perspectives and economic outputs

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 November 2019

Christopher Y. Olivola
Affiliation:
Tepper School of Business, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA 15213olivola@cmu.eduhttps://sites.google.com/site/chrisolivola/ Department of Social and Decision Sciences, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA 15213
Helen Susannah Moat
Affiliation:
Data Science Lab, Behavioural Science Group, Warwick Business School, University of Warwick, Coventry CV4 7AL, United KingdomSuzy.Moat@wbs.ac.ukTobias.Preis@wbs.ac.ukhttp://www.wbs.ac.uk/about/person/suzy-moat/http://www.wbs.ac.uk/about/person/tobias-preis/ The Alan Turing Institute, British Library, London NW1 2DB, United Kingdom.
Tobias Preis
Affiliation:
Data Science Lab, Behavioural Science Group, Warwick Business School, University of Warwick, Coventry CV4 7AL, United KingdomSuzy.Moat@wbs.ac.ukTobias.Preis@wbs.ac.ukhttp://www.wbs.ac.uk/about/person/suzy-moat/http://www.wbs.ac.uk/about/person/tobias-preis/ The Alan Turing Institute, British Library, London NW1 2DB, United Kingdom.

Abstract

Recent studies have shown that population-level time perspectives can be approximated using “big data” on search engine queries, and that these indices, in turn, predict the per-capita Gross Domestic Product of countries. Although these findings seem to support Baumard's suggestion that affluence makes people more future-oriented, they also reveal a more complex relationship between time perspectives and economic outputs.

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2019 

Baumard argues that affluence leads to people becoming more future-oriented, which, in turn, allows for greater innovation efforts. This is an intriguing hypothesis, but also one that requires the right kinds of population-level data to test it. Fortunately, researchers can now use search engine data to map human behaviors and derive proxies of human cognition at the aggregate level (Moat et al. Reference Moat, Preis, Olivola, Liu and Chater2014; Reference Moat, Olivola, Preis and Chater2016).

The growing availability of data on the Web offers novel ways to estimate the characteristics of time preferences at the population level. For example, according to one prominent decision making theory (Olivola & Chater Reference Olivola, Chater and Jones2017; Stewart et al. Reference Stewart, Chater and Brown2006), the curvature of the delay discount function (i.e., the rate at which delayed rewards are devalued compared with immediate rewards) is determined by the relative frequencies with which people are exposed to delays of various lengths, and this, in turn, can be estimated from the contents of the Web. Specifically, researchers have used the frequencies of mentions of various delay lengths (e.g., “1 day,” “2 days,” …, “1 week,” “2 weeks,” etc.) to estimate this exposure, and shown that the resulting distribution predicts the shape of one of the most empirically established delay discount functions (Olivola & Chater Reference Olivola, Chater and Jones2017; Stewart et al. Reference Stewart, Chater and Brown2006). One could, in principle, carry out separate searches of this sort for different countries (e.g., by counting the relative mentions of delay lengths in the most prominent news sources within each country) to estimate their (aggregate) discount functions and see whether this predicts their levels of innovation and economic performance.

In fact, with our colleagues, we have proposed novel proxies of aggregate (population-level) time perspectives, which can be estimated for each country (Noguchi et al. Reference Noguchi, Stewart, Olivola, Moat and Preis2014; Preis et al. Reference Preis, Moat, Stanley and Bishop2012). Specifically, we used Google Trends to calculate the relative volume of searches for future years (e.g., searching for “2020” in the year 2019), past years (e.g., searching for “2018” in the year 2019), and present years (e.g., searching for “2019” in 2019), within each country. The ratios of these search volumes provide indices of the extent to which the online search behavior of citizens in a given country is focused on the future relative to the past (Preis et al. Reference Preis, Moat, Stanley and Bishop2012), as well as the future relative to the present and the past relative to the present (Noguchi et al. Reference Noguchi, Stewart, Olivola, Moat and Preis2014). These indices can be obtained for many countries, and for a number of different years, going back more than a decade. As such, they constitute useful approximations of aggregate time perspectives – the extent to which people are focused on the past, present, and future – for each country.

It turns out these time perspective indices are strongly correlated with gross domestic product (GDP) per capita – a key measure of a country's economic output. Preis et al. (Reference Preis, Moat, Stanley and Bishop2012) calculated the ratio of future-year searches to past-year searches for 45 different countries and found that the resulting “future orientation” values predicted per capita GDP (r = .78). Noguchi et al. (Reference Noguchi, Stewart, Olivola, Moat and Preis2014) examined four other indices: the ratio of future-year searches to present-year searches (“future focus”), the ratio of past-year searches to present-year searches (“past focus”), the deceleration in the volume of past-year searches (“past time horizon”), and the acceleration in the volume of future-year searches (“future time horizon”). They found that three of these four indices (future focus, past focus, and past time horizon) were significant predictors of country per capita GDP. Specifically, higher future focus and past time-horizon values, as well as lower past focus values, were all independently associated with higher per capita GDP. In sum, this work shows that one can generate indices of population-level time perspectives using “big data” from activity on the Web, and that the resulting indices are strongly correlated with economic output.

These findings seem to support Baumard's suggestion that affluence makes people more future-oriented. However, these studies also reveal that the relationship between time perspectives and economic outputs is more complex than he suggests. For example, the extent to which a population is focused on the past (vs. present) and the extent to which it is focused on the future (vs. present) both independently predict economic output, albeit in opposite directions (Noguchi et al. Reference Noguchi, Stewart, Olivola, Moat and Preis2014). Moreover, the rate at which a population shifts its focus from the past to the present over time (past time-horizon) also positively predicts economic output (Noguchi et al. Reference Noguchi, Stewart, Olivola, Moat and Preis2014). Finally, we echo Baumard's caution against drawing strong conclusions regarding the direction of the relationship between future orientation (or other time focus indices) and economic performance without appropriate, additional evidence, as each could plausibly affect the other: greater affluence could lead to people becoming more future-oriented; however, a greater focus on the future could also lead to greater affluence, by helping people consider the future consequences of their decisions (Read et al. Reference Read, Olivola and Hardisty2017), and thus maximize their long-term wealth.

Acknowledgments

H.S.M. and T. P. were supported by The Alan Turing Institute under EPSRC Grant EP/N510129/1 via Turing Awards TU/B/000006 (H.S.M.) and TU/B/000008 (T.P.).Footnote 1

Footnotes

© The authors 2019

1. The funding information was incorrect in the original online version of this commentary. It has been corrected here and an erratum has been published.

References

Moat, H. S., Olivola, C. Y., Preis, T. & Chater, N. (2016) Searching choices: Quantifying decision making processes using search engine data. Topics in Cognitive Science 8(3):685–96.Google Scholar
Moat, H. S., Preis, T., Olivola, C. Y., Liu, C. & Chater, N. (2014) Using big data to predict collective behavior in the real world. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 37:9293.Google Scholar
Noguchi, T., Stewart, N., Olivola, C. Y., Moat, H. S. & Preis, T. (2014) Characterizing the time-perspective of nations with search engine query data. PLoS One 9(4): e95209.Google Scholar
Olivola, C. Y. & Chater, N. (2017) Decision by sampling: Connecting preferences to real-world regularities. In: Big data in cognitive science, ed. Jones, M. N.. Routledge.Google Scholar
Preis, T., Moat, H. S., Stanley, H. E. & Bishop, S. R. (2012) Quantifying the advantage of looking forward. Scientific Reports 2:350.Google Scholar
Read, D., Olivola, C. Y. & Hardisty, D. J. (2017) The value of nothing: Asymmetric attention to opportunity costs drives intertemporal decision making. Management Science 63(12):4277–97.Google Scholar
Stewart, N., Chater, N. & Brown, G. D. A. (2006) Decision by sampling. Cognitive Psychology 53:126.Google Scholar