Hostname: page-component-7b9c58cd5d-wdhn8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-03-13T14:12:17.042Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

An entomopathogenic strain of Beauveria bassiana (hypocreales: Cordycipitaceae) against Eotetranychus kankitus (acarina: Tetranychidae) and its compatibility with Neoseiulus barkeri (acarina: Phytoseiidae)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 February 2025

Mingxiu Liu
Affiliation:
Key Laboratory of Agricultural Biosafety and Green Production of Upper Yangtze River, Key Laboratory of Entomology and Pest Control Engineering, College of Plant Protection, Southwest University, Chongqing 400716, China Yibin Academy of Southwest University, Yibin 644000, China
Dong Xiang
Affiliation:
Institute of Vegetable, Tibet Academy of Agriculture and Animal Husbandry Sciences, Lhasa, 850032, China
Xiaotian Feng
Affiliation:
Key Laboratory of Agricultural Biosafety and Green Production of Upper Yangtze River, Key Laboratory of Entomology and Pest Control Engineering, College of Plant Protection, Southwest University, Chongqing 400716, China
Xuanliang Li
Affiliation:
Key Laboratory of Agricultural Biosafety and Green Production of Upper Yangtze River, Key Laboratory of Entomology and Pest Control Engineering, College of Plant Protection, Southwest University, Chongqing 400716, China
Mian Wang
Affiliation:
Key Laboratory of Agricultural Biosafety and Green Production of Upper Yangtze River, Key Laboratory of Entomology and Pest Control Engineering, College of Plant Protection, Southwest University, Chongqing 400716, China
Zhen Wang
Affiliation:
Institute of Vegetable, Tibet Academy of Agriculture and Animal Husbandry Sciences, Lhasa, 850032, China
Hanqiu Chen
Affiliation:
Institute of Vegetable, Tibet Academy of Agriculture and Animal Husbandry Sciences, Lhasa, 850032, China
Huai Liu
Affiliation:
Key Laboratory of Agricultural Biosafety and Green Production of Upper Yangtze River, Key Laboratory of Entomology and Pest Control Engineering, College of Plant Protection, Southwest University, Chongqing 400716, China Yibin Academy of Southwest University, Yibin 644000, China
Yaying Li*
Affiliation:
Key Laboratory of Agricultural Biosafety and Green Production of Upper Yangtze River, Key Laboratory of Entomology and Pest Control Engineering, College of Plant Protection, Southwest University, Chongqing 400716, China Yibin Academy of Southwest University, Yibin 644000, China
*
Corresponding author: Yaying Li; Email: liyaying@swu.edu.cn
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Eotetranychus kankitus is an important pest on several agricultural crops, and its resistance to pesticides has promoted the exploration of biological control strategies. Beauveria bassiana and Neoseiulus barkeri have been identified as potential agents for suppressing spider mites. This study aimed to investigate the pathogenicity of B. bassiana on E. kankitus and its compatibility with N. barkeri. Results showed that among the five tested strains of B. bassiana, Bb025 exhibited the highest level of pathogenicity on E. kankitus. Higher application rates (1 × 108 conidia/mL) of Bb025 led to a higher mortality rate of E. kankitus (90.402%), but also resulted in a 15.036% mortality of N. barkeri. Furthermore, preference response tests indicated that both E. kankitus and N. barkeri actively avoided plants sprayed with Bb025 compared to the control group that was sprayed with Tween-80. In a no-choice test, we observed that N. barkeri actively attacked Bb025-treated E. kankitus with no adverse effect on its predatory capacities. Furthermore, N. barkeri laid more eggs when fed on Bb025-treated E. kankitus compared to Tween-80-treated E. kankitus, but the subsequent generation of surviving individuals fed on Bb025-treated E. kankitus was reduced. These findings demonstrate that the Bb025 strain of B. bassiana is highly virulent against E. kankitus while causing less harm to N. barkeri. Consequently, a promising strategy for controlling E. kankitus could involve the sequential utilisation of Bb025 and N. barkeri at appropriate intervals.

Type
Research Paper
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2025. Published by Cambridge University Press.

Introduction

Eotetranychus kankitus is a significant pest mite found in orchards primarily in the Oriental and Palearctic regions (Wang et al., Reference Wang, Ran and Duan2014). The mobile life stages of this mite feed on the surfaces of leaves and young terminal shoots by using their piercing-sucking mouthparts, causing mesophyll collapse and subsequent leaf drop (Zhou et al., Reference Zhou, Yue and Zou1999). Although E. kankitus is not as widely distributed as other pest mites like Panonychus citri and Phyllocoptruta oleivora, it causes more serious damage when it does appear (Li et al., Reference Li, Liu, Zhou, Tian, Zhang, Liu, Liu and Wang2017). Additionally, E. kankitus frequently co-occurs with P. citri or P. oleivora, forming in a pest complex that poses significant difficulties for orchard management (Li et al., Reference Li, Wang, Zhang and Liu2014; Zhou et al., Reference Zhou, Yue and Zou1999). Traditionally, acaricides have been used to control E. kankitus (Chen et al., Reference Chen, Jiang and Wang2023). However, the effectiveness of acaricides is limited due to the mite’s quick development of resistance, short life cycle, high reproductive rate, and parthenogenesis. Therefore, the development of biological control strategies is necessary to manage this mite.

One promising approach to managing E. kankitus is the use of entomopathogenic fungi as biological control agents. These fungi can infect spider mites, leading to their mortality and ultimately reducing their population densities (Shah and Pell, Reference Shah and Pell2003). Beauveria bassiana is distributed worldwide and can infect various pest species, including Lepidoptera, Hemiptera, Coleoptera, Diptera, and Acarina (Altinok et al., Reference Altinok, Altinok and Koca2019; Sohrabi et al., Reference Sohrabi, Jamali, Morammazi, Saber and Kamita2019; Wu et al., Reference Wu, Xie, Li, Xu and Lei2016a). According to earlier research, B. bassiana has potential in controlling pest mite species, such as Tetranychus urticae (Wu et al., Reference Wu, Xie, Li, Xu and Lei2016a), T. evansi (Wekesa et al., Reference Wekesa, Maniania, Knapp and Boga2005), P. oleivora (Alves et al., Reference Alves, Tamai, Rossi and Castiglioni2005), and P. citri (Shi and Feng, Reference Shi and Feng2006). However, there is limited research on the use of B. bassiana for controlling E. kankitus.

The effectiveness of biological control may be increased by employing multiple natural enemies (Chandler et al., Reference Chandler, Davidson and Jacobson2005). Research suggests that using natural enemies in cooperation with B. bassiana shows potential in controlling pests (Baverstock et al., Reference Baverstock, Roy and Pell2010; Castillo-Ramírez et al., Reference Castillo-Ramírez, Guzmán-Franco, Santillán-Galicia and Tamayo-Mejía2020; De Freitas et al., Reference De Freitas, Lira, Jumbo, Dos Santos, Rêgo and Teodoro2021; Lin et al., Reference Lin, Tanguay, Guertin, Todorova and Brodeur2017). For example, the combined use of B. bassiana and Stratiolaelaps scimitus increased control efficacy for Frankliniella occidentalis (Zhang et al., Reference Zhang, Wu, Reitz and Gao2021). Furthermore, natural enemies such as insects or mites, acting as vectors for B. bassiana conidia, also show potential in controlling pests. Diaphorina citri died after B. bassiana conidia were successfully delivered to it by Amblyseius swirskii or Neoseiulus cucumeris (Zhang et al., Reference Zhang, Sun, Lin, Lin, Chen, Ji, Zhang and Saito2015). Therefore, it is recommended to combine the use of entomopathogenic fungi with release of natural enemies as a potential strategy to improve the efficacy of controlling E. kankitus.

The predatory mite, N. barkeri, has been successfully used to suppress E. kankitus (Li et al., Reference Li, Liu, Zhou, Tian, Zhang, Liu, Liu and Wang2017). To optimise the efficiency of E. kankitus control, we explored the potential of combining the application of B. bassiana with the releases of N. barkeri. However, there is a potential risk that the fungus could harm the predatory mites, given that various insect and mite species are susceptible to B. bassiana. Previous research has shown that spraying B. bassiana on adult predatory mites resulted in approximately 43% mortality of predators (Numa Vergel et al., Reference Numa Vergel, Bustos, Rodríguez and Cantor2011). Additionally, several researchers have found negative effects on predator life cycles and predation parameters when B. bassiana was sprayed (Ullah and Lim, Reference Ullah and Lim2017) or when predators fed on B. bassiana-infected prey (Seiedy, Reference Seiedy2015; Seiedy et al., Reference Seiedy, Saboori and Allahyari2012a; Wu et al., Reference Wu, Gao, Xu, Wang, Li, Wang, Wang and Lei2015b). Therefore, evaluating the compatibility between B. bassiana and predatory mites is crucial for the success of integrated pest management (IPM) programs targeting the control of E. kankitus.

In this study, we evaluated the pathogenicity of five isolates of B. bassiana against E. kankitus. Subsequently, we assessed the direct lethal effects of different concentrations of the selected virulent isolates on both E. kankitus and N. barkeri by exposing the mites to B. bassiana. Additionally, we determined the habitat preference, predatory behaviour, fecundity, and offspring survival of N. barkeri in the presence of risks posed by B. bassiana.

Materials and methods

Rearing of entomopathogenic and mites

Five strains of B. bassiana (Bb02, Bb014, Bb025, Bb062, and Bb252) were obtained from the Biotechnology Centre of Southwest University and regularly cultivated on Potato Dextrose Agar plates at 25℃ in the dark for 14 days. Conidia were collected from the agar plates for the tests by flooding them in a sterile 0.05% Tween-80 solution, and their concentration was measured using a haemocytometer. The citrus yellow mites, E. kankitus, were cultivated on Citrus sinensis leaf discs (7 cm in diameter). These leaf discs were placed in Petri dishes (9 cm in diameter, 2 cm in depth) on water-soaked polyurethane mats. To prevent mites from escaping, the edges of the leaf discs were surrounded with wet cotton wool. The predatory mites, N. barkeri, were maintained in a plastic cylindrical container (15 cm in diameter, 8 cm in depth). A plastic lid covered the container, with a 5 cm diameter opening in the centre covered with stainless steel wire netting to provide ventilation. Spider mites were swept into the container twice per day using a brush to rear the predatory mites. All mites were kept in a climate chamber at a temperature of 25 ± 1 °C, relative humidity of 80 ± 5%, and a photoperiod of L16: D8 hours.

Seection of B. bassiana strains on E. kankitus

The pathogenicity of five B bassiana isolates on female E. kankitus was tested. Thirty E. kankitus females (one-day-old) were placed onto leaf discs and then sprayed with 1 mL of a 1 × 107 conidia/mL fungal suspension using a spray tower. Eotetranychus kankitus sprayed with 0.05% Tween-80 solution served as the control. The mites treated with B. bassiana or Tween-80 were then transferred onto new leaf disc, respectively. Mortality was recorded daily for 9 days. Dead spider mites were transferred to a sterile Petri plate lined with wet filter paper at each observation. The plates were then covered with Parafilm® and maintained at 25°C in the dark. They were monitored daily for symptoms of mycosis. Spider mites showing visible mycelium growth on their body surface were considered to have died from fungal infection. Three replicates were performed for each B. bassiana isolate.

Efects of Bb025 on susceptibility of E. kankitus and N. barkeri

Based on the pathogenicity of five B. bassiana strains on E. kankitus, the strain Bb025 was selected for multiple concentration bioassays against both E. kankitus and N. barkeri. Thirty E. kankitus females (one-day-old) were sprayed with six different concentrations of Bb025 conidial suspension (1 × 103, 1 × 104, 1 × 105, 1 × 106, 1 × 107, 1 × 108 conidia/mL), while thirty N. barkeri females (one-day-old) were sprayed with two different concentrations (1 × 107, 1 × 108 conidia/mL). Tween-80 solution (0.05%) was sprayed on E. kankitus and N. barkeri as the control. The spraying method of B. bassiana and the method for determining the number of dead mites are described above. Each concentration was replicated three times, and mortality was recorded daily for 9 days.

Efect of Bb025 on habitat preference in E. kankitus and N. barkeri

Two leaflets of the same size (4 cm in diameter) were used in the experiment and placed upside down on a foam cube (14 cm in diameter, 1 cm in depth). The foam cube was then placed in Petri dishes (15 cm in diameter, 2.5 cm in depth) filled halfway with water. A wax bridge (4 × 0.5 cm) connected the leaflets (Walzer et al., Reference Walzer, Paulus and Schausberger2006). One of the leaflets was sprayed with 1 mL of a 1 × 108 conidia/mL Bb025 conidial suspension, serving as the treatment group. The other leaflet was treated with 1 mL Tween-80 solution (0.05%), serving as the control group. For each choice, a single female was randomly selected and placed in the middle of the bridge. Patch selection was observed at 0, 15, 30, 45, 60, 90, and 120 minutes. One hundred individuals for each mite species (E. kankitus or N. barkeri) were tested, with each experimental unit and mite being used only once.

Efect of Bb025 on predatory behaviour of N. barkeri

Predatory mites may invest a significant amount of time and energy in self-grooming behaviours following treatment with B. bassiana, potentially reducing their ability to search for and feed on prey. Thus, we conducted an experiment to observe the movement and self-grooming behaviours of N. barkeri when inhabiting Bb025-treated citrus leaves and feeding on Bb025-treated E. kankitus. The experiment involved spraying leaf discs containing thirty E. kankitus eggs with a 1 mL Bb025 conidial suspension (1 × 108 conidia/mL) as the treatment group, while leaf discs sprayed with Tween-80 (0.05%) served as the control group. After 10 minutes, a single N. barkeri female (starved for 24 hours) was introduced into each leaf disc, and their movement, self-grooming behaviour, and predatory tendencies towards E. kankitus eggs were observed and recorded over a 10-minute period. Additionally, the number of E. kankitus eggs consumed by N. barkeri was recorded after 2 hours of exposure to the leaf disc. A new leaf disc was used for each test, with nine mites tested individually.

Efect of Bb025 on fecundity and offspring survival of N. barkeri

To evaluate the safety of predators feeding on prey infected with Bb025, we determined the predatory capacity, fecundity, and offspring survival of N. barkeri. Females of N. barkeri (starved for 24 hours) were placed on a leaf disc. Then, thirty E. kankitus females, previously sprayed with a concentration of 1 × 108 conidia/mL of Bb025, were offered to N. barker individuals daily at 3.5 days post-inoculation (corresponding to the LT50 value of E. kankitus). As a control group, thirty E. kankitus females sprayed with Tween-80 (0.05%) were provided to N. barker individuals at 3.5 days post-spray. The number of consumed prey and the number of eggs laid by N. barkeri were counted daily for 7 days. The eggs laid by N. barkeri were transferred daily to a new leaf disc, where both Bb025 and Tween-80 sprayed E. kankitus females were provided daily. The individuals were monitored daily, and the number of live individuals was recorded after 7 days. Each treatment was replicated six times.

Data analyses

All statistical analyses were performed using SPSS 26.0. Mortality data were corrected for natural mortality (Abbott, Reference Abbott1925), and then normalised using arcsine-transformed before conducting a one-way ANOVA. Probit analysis was used to estimate the lethal time to 50% mortality (LT50) and the lethal concentration causing 50% mortality (LC50). Preference data were analysed using a chi-squared test. The frequency of N. barkeri self-grooming, grooming time, moving time, frequency of predation tendencies, E. kankitus egg and female consumption by N. barkeri, total number of eggs laid by N. barkeri, and the total number of new generation individuals were analysed using an independent-sample t-test between the Bb025 and Tween-80-treated groups.

Results

Section of B. bassiana strains on E. kankitus

The pathogenicity of five B. bassiana isolates (1 × 107 conidia/mL) was evaluated against the female of E. kankitus (Fig. 1 and Table 1). The five isolates were highly effective against E. kankitus, with mortality rates increasing over time. After 9 days, the cumulative corrected mortality rates of E. kankitus varied significantly among the five isolates (F = 26.720; df = 4, 10; P < 0.001), ranging from 53.611% to 81.899% (Fig. 1). The LT50 values against female E. kankitus for the five isolates ranged from 4.414 to 7.324 days (Table 1). Notably, the Bb025 isolate exhibited the highest effectiveness (Fig. 1), with an LT50 value of 4.414 days, which lower than that of the other B. bassiana isolates (Table 1).

Figure 1. Cumulative corrected mortality rate (mean ± SE) of Eotetranychus kankitus females caused by five isolates of B. bassiana, including Bb02, Bb014, Bb025, Bb062, and Bb252.

Table 1 Lethal time (LT50) estimations of five B. bassiana in E. kankitus

Efects of Bb025 on susceptibility of E. kankitus and N. barkeri

The mortality rates of E. kankitus varied among different conidial concentrations of Bb025 and increased with conidial concentrations. The 1 × 108 conidia/mL Bb025 treatment consistently resulted in the highest mortality of E. kankitus during the test period, with a corrected mortality rate of 90.402% on the 9th day (Fig. 2a). The mortality of N. barkeri treated with 1 × 108 conidia/mL Bb025 was comparable to that of the 1 × 107 conidia/mL Bb025 treatment for the first eight days (Fig. 2b). However, after exposure to 1 × 107 and 1 × 108 conidia/mL Bb025 conidial suspension, the predatory mite’s corrected mortality rates were 8.385% and 15.036%, respectively, on the 9th day.

Figure 2. Cumulative corrected mortality rate (mean ± SE) of Eotetranychus kankitus (a) and Neoseiulus barkeri (b) females caused by Bb025 at different concentrations of conidia.

The Bb025 strain had a lower LC50 value of 3.488 × 105 conidia/mL for E. kankitus. However, the LC50 value for the predatory mites could not be calculated because the mortality rate of N. barkeri remained low, even when exposed to higher concentrations of Bb025 (Table 2). Furthermore, E. kankitus had a lower LT50 value (3.581 days) compared to N. barkeri (22.773 days) when treated with a concentration of 1 × 108 conidia/mL of Bb025 (Table 3).

Table 2 Lethal concentration (LC50) estimations of B. bassiana isolate Bb025 on the E. kankitus and N. barkeri

1 E. k: E. kankitus.

2 N. b: N. barkeri.

3 The mortality rate of N. barkeri remained low when treated with higher concentrations of Bb025, making it impossible to calculate the LC50 value for the predatory mites in this study.

Table 3 Lethal time (LT50) estimations of B. bassiana isolate Bb025 on the E. kankitus and N. barkeri

1 E. k: E. kankitus.

2 N. b: N. barkeri.

Efect of Bb025 on habitat preference in E. kankitus and N. barkeri

The citrus yellow mites, E. kankitus, exhibited a habitat preference for Tween-80-treated leaflets at different time points: 0, 15, 30, 45, 60, 90, and 120 minutes after treatment (Fig. 3a). A similar preference for Tween-80-treated leaflets was also observed in N. barkeri (Fig. 3b).

Figure 3. Preference of Eoteranchus kankitus (a) and Neoseiulus barkeri (b) to citrus leaflets inoculated with Bb025 (1 × 108 conidia/mL) and 0.05% Tween-80. Data were analysed using a chi-squared test to evaluate differences in each choice experiment (P < 0.05). The asterisk indicates significant differences between Bb025 and Tween-80 treatments.

Efect of Bb025 on predatory behaviour of N. barkeri

The predatory mites, N. barkeri, displayed various behaviours such as movement, remaining stationary, and self-grooming when exposed to citrus leaves sprayed with a concentration of 1 × 108 conidia/mL of Bb025 or 0.05% Tween-80. No significant differences were observed in the frequency of self-grooming between N. barkeri on leaf discs sprayed with Bb025 and Tween-80 (t = 1.682, df = 16, P = 0.112) (Fig. 4a). However, N. barkeri spent significantly more time self-grooming on citrus leaves sprayed with Bb025 (109.889 seconds) compared to those sprayed with Tween-80 (45.111 seconds) (t = 2.631, df = 16, P = 0.018) (Fig. 4b). Furthermore, a significant difference was found in the time spent moving on citrus leaves sprayed with Bb025 and Tween-80 (460.111 seconds vs. 535.667 seconds) for N. barkeri (t = − 2.497, df = 16, P = 0.024) (Fig. 4c). Conversely, no significant differences were noted in the frequency of predatory tendencies (10 minutes, t = − 0.985, df = 16, P = 0.339) or in the number of E. kankitus eggs consumed by N. barkeri (2 hours, t = − 0.483, df = 16, P = 0.636) when preying on spider mites sprayed with Bb025 and Tween-80 (Fig. 5).

Figure 4. Grooming frequency (a), grooming time (b) and moving time (c) of Neoseiulus barkeri on citrus leaflets inoculated with Bb025 (1 × 108 conidia/mL) and 0.05% Tween-80. The ‘ns’ and asterisk indicate no significant and significant differences, respectively, between Bb025 and Tween-80 treatments, based on an independent-samples t-test (P < 0.05).

Figure 5. Frequency of predatory tendencies of Neoseiulus barkeri towards Eoteranchus kankitus eggs over a 10-minute period (a) and the number of E. kankitus eggs consumed by N. barkeri within 2 hours (b) on citrus leaflets inoculated with Bb025 (1 × 108 conidia/mL) and 0.05% Tween-80. The ‘ns’ indicates no significant differences between Bb025 and Tween-80 treatments, based on an independent-samples t-test (P < 0.05).

Efect of Bb025 on fecundity and offspring survival of N. barkeri

A higher number of E. kankitus females sprayed with Bb025 were consumed by N. barkeri compared to those treated with Tween-80 (t = − 2.818, df = 10, P = 0.018) (Fig. 6a). Additionally, the total number of eggs laid by N. barkeri was greater when fed on E. kankitus females sprayed with Bb025 compared to those sprayed with Tween-80 (18.833 vs. 13.000; t = − 2.637, df = 10, P = 0.025) (Fig. 6b). However, the total number of new generation individuals was 10.333 and 14.833 for N. barkeri female fed on E. kankitus sprayed with Bb025 and Tween-80, respectively, and these values were not significantly different (t = − 2.212, df = 10, P = 0.051) (Fig. 6c).

Figure 6. The number of Eoteranchus kankitus inoculated with Bb025 (1 × 108 conidia/mL) and 0.05% Tween-80 that were consumed by Neoseiulus barkeri (a), along with the number of eggs laid by N. barkeri (b) and the number of new generation individuals of N. barkeri (c) after feeding on these treated E. kankitus. The ‘ns’ and asterisk indicate no significant and significant differences, respectively, between Bb025 and Tween-80 treatments, based on an independent-samples t-test (P < 0.05).

Discussion

In this study, a strain of B. bassiana (Bb025) was selected for its high virulence against E. kankitus and lower pathogenicity towards N. barkeri. Both E. kankitus and N. barkeri exhibited avoidance behaviour towards leaves infected with Bb025. Additionally, the predatory capacity of N. barkeri female was not influenced by the presence of Bb025, although N. barkeri spent significantly more time engaging in self-grooming behaviour on leaf discs sprayed with Bb025 conidia. Notably, the number of eggs laid by N. barkeri feeding on infected E. kankitus increased, but subsequent generation individuals of N. barkeri feeding on treated E. kankitus were affected. These findings provide the potential of a combined approach using Bb025 and N. barkeri for effective biological control of E. kankitus at appropriate intervals.

Lower LT50 values and higher mortality rates indicate that the pests were rapidly infected by the fungus, which are important characteristics for choosing fungal strains as potential biocontrol agents (Geroh et al., Reference Geroh, Gulati and Tehri2015; Wekesa et al., Reference Wekesa, Maniania, Knapp and Boga2005). In our study, the isolate of Bb025 showed lower LT50 values and a higher corrected mortality rate when targeting E. kankitus. These findings indicate that the fungal strain Bb025 has the potential to effectively control the population of E. kankitus. The fungal pathogenicity on pest populations is mainly influenced by dosage, and the mortality of pests often varies with conidial concentration (Krishnan et al., Reference Krishnan, Kaushik, Gulati and Sharma2012; Sarasan et al., Reference Sarasan, Kite, Sileshi and Stevenson2011). Our results also found that the application of Bb025 to control E. kankitus exhibited a clear concentration-dependent relationship, with higher fungal concentrations leading to increased mortality rates of E. kankitus. The maximum mortality rate observed was 90.402% in E. kankitus sprayed with 1 × 108 conidia/mL Bb025. However, it is important to note that using higher concentrations of fungi can also result in the direct mortality of non-target natural enemies (Flexner et al., Reference Flexner, Lighthart and Croft1986). Castillo-Ramírez et al. (Reference Castillo-Ramírez, Guzmán-Franco, Santillán-Galicia and Tamayo-Mejía2020) reported that over 20% of N. californicus and Phytoseiulus persimilis died when infected with 1 × 108 conidia/mL Bb88 during the 9-day experiment. In our study, the mortality rate of N. barkeri was found to be 15.036% when infected with 1 × 108 conidia/mL Bb025, indicating that N. barkeri was susceptible to Bb025.

The pathogenicity of a fungus to a target insect is primarily caused by the penetration of the insect’s cuticle by conidia (Wu et al., Reference Wu, Guo, Xing, Gao, Xu and Lei2018a). Previous study demonstrated that germinated conidia of B. bassiana SZ-26 were unable to penetrate the cuticle of N. barkeri (Wu et al., Reference Wu, Gao, Zhang, Wang, Xu and Lei2014), and transmission electronic microscopy revealed that most SZ-26 B. bassiana conidia in the gut of the predatory mite dissolved within 24 h post-ingestion (Wu et al., Reference Wu, Zhang, Xu and Lei2016b). However, Niu et al. (Reference Niu, Nima, Li, Yang, Chen, Li and Liu2023) reported that Bb025 can invade through the depressions and pores of the N. barkeri body wall. Additionally, Bb025 was detected in N. barkeri tissue using a specific nested PCR technique (Supplementary Fig. S1). These findings further confirm that the strain Bb025 has lower pathogenicity for the predatory mites N. barkeri.

Citrus yellow mites, E. kankitus, significantly avoided leaves sprayed with Bb025, suggesting that the presence of Bb025 decreased the consumption of citrus leaves by E. kankitus. This finding is consistent with the research by Rondot and Reineke (Reference Rondot and Reineke2017), who found that the presence of endophytic entomopathogenic fungi influenced the host choice behaviour of adult black vine weevils, leading to the avoidance of colonised plants and a consequent decrease in pest consumption. Seiedy (Reference Seiedy2014) reported that the presence of fungi in the prey or its habitat can affect the behaviour of predators, such as preference, activity, and feeding. This response implies that predators can recognise dangerous conditions through odour (Wu et al., Reference Wu, Gao, Xu, Wang, Li, Wang, Wang and Lei2015b), and adjust their behaviour (Baverstock et al., Reference Baverstock, Alderson and Pell2005; Faraji et al., Reference Faraji, Janssen and Sabelis2001). In our study, the predator N. barkeri also showed avoidance behaviour towards plants treated with Bb025. Additionally, N. barkeri invested more time in self-grooming on leaf discs with Bb025 conidia, which reduced the time spent searching for prey. Surprisingly, this self-grooming behaviour did not influence the predation capacity of N. barkeri on E. kankitus. This indicates that N. barkeri may be capable of recognising the presence of Bb025 and responding with avoidance behaviour or post-contact responses. If contact with spores is unavoidable, the self-grooming behaviour may effectively remove most spores attached to N. barkeri. This selection and self-grooming behaviour potentially enhances the survival rate of the predator (Seiedy et al., Reference Seiedy, Saboori, Allahyari, Talaei-Hassanloui and Tork2012b).

Insects possess a selective advantage through their ability to detect and avoid fungal pathogens. According to Ríos-Moreno et al. (Reference Ríos-Moreno, Quesada-Moraga and Garrido-Jurado2018), Chrysoperla carnea larvae exhibited a preference for consuming healthy prey over those treated with Metarhizium brunneum. However, females of N. barkeri consumed more E. kankitus females infected with Bb025, laying more eggs compared to prey sprayed with Tween-80 in a no-choice test. This could be due to the decreased vitality of E. kankitus caused by fungal penetration, making them more vulnerable to predation by N. barkeri. These results are consistent with the findings of Wu et al.. (Reference Wu, Gao, Xu, Goettel and Lei2015a). Furthermore, the population of subsequent generation individuals that fed on infected E. kankitus was reduced, presumably due to the weakly sclerotised cuticle of N. barkeri juveniles (Koehler, Reference Koehler1999; Shipp et al., Reference Shipp, Zhang, Hunt and Ferguson2003). Thus, applying Bb025 and N. barkeri at short intervals may negatively impact the number of predatory mite offspring and hinder the establishment of predatory mites in the field.

Based on our findings, we suggest a combined approach using Bb025 and N. barkeri for E. kankitus control. Initially, spraying plants with Bb025 will decrease the density of E. kankitus due to the direct lethal effect of the Bb025 on E. kankitus in the sprayed areas. Additionally, the repelling effect of Bb025 on spider mites can help prevent the spread of E. kankitus from unsprayed to sprayed areas. Subsequently, releasing N. barkeri at appropriate intervals after spraying the fungus is recommended. These predatory mites can move to areas where Bb025 has not been sprayed, effectively controlling E. kankitus. Although N. barkeri may come into contact with the fungus while moving around and handling prey on the leaves, their grooming behaviour can help remove the conidia from their bodies (Wekesa et al., Reference Wekesa, Moraes, Knapp and Delalibera2007; Wu et al., Reference Wu, Xing, Sun, Xu, Meng and Lei2018b). Meanwhile, N. barkeri consumed more infected E. kankitus adults, resulting in lower population density of prey. It was found that B. bassiana had limited efficacy in suppressing the immature stages of spider mites (Wu et al., Reference Wu, Sarkar, Lv, Xu and Lei2020), indicating that N. barkeri and its offspring could provide continuous control for the immature stage of E. kankitus where B. bassiana failed to control. In conclusion, these findings suggest that using Bb025 strains of B. bassiana in combination with N. barkeri may be an effective approach for controlling E. kankitus on plants.

This integrated pest management strategy takes advantage of the strengths of both the entomopathogenic fungus and the predatory mites to address the pest problem more effectively. However, there is insufficient evidence to accurately forecast how the combined application of the two biocontrol agents will contribute to an additive suppression of the pest mite population. It will also be necessary to evaluate the combined effect of the two predators on E. kankitus in a more natural environment.

Supplementary material

The supplementary material for this article can be found at https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007485325000057.

Acknowledgements

The present research work was supported by National Key R&D Program of China (2023YFD1400600), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (32072483), the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (SWU-KQ22019), the Shuangcheng cooperative agreement research grant of Yibin (XNDX2022020014), China and the Key R&D Program of Tibet, China (XZ202301ZY0014N).

Competing interests

None.

Footnotes

**

Corresponding authors at: College of Plant Protection, Southwest University, Chongqing 400716, China

References

Abbott, WS (1925) A method of computing the effectiveness of an insecticide. Journal of the American Mosquito Control Association 3, 302303.Google Scholar
Altinok, H, Altinok, M and Koca, A (2019) Modes of action of entomopathogenic fungi. Current Trends in Natural Sciences 8, 117124.Google Scholar
Alves, SB, Tamai, MA, Rossi, LS and Castiglioni, E (2005) Beauveria bassiana pathogenicity to the citrus rust mite phyllocoptruta oleivora. Experimental and Applied Acarology 37, 117122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baverstock, J, Alderson, PG and Pell, JK (2005) Influence of the aphid pathogen Pandora neoaphidis on the foraging behaviour of the aphid parasitoid Aphidius ervi. Ecological Entomology 30, 665672.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baverstock, J, Roy, HE and Pell, JK (2010) Entomopathogenic fungi and insect behaviour: From unsuspecting hosts to targeted vectors. BioControl 55, 89102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Castillo-Ramírez, O, Guzmán-Franco, AW, Santillán-Galicia, MT and Tamayo-Mejía, F (2020) Interaction between predatory mites (acari: phytoseiidae) and entomopathogenic fungi in Tetranychus urticae populations. BioControl 65, 433445.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chandler, D, Davidson, G, and Jacobson, RJ (2005) Laboratory and glasshouse evaluation of entomopathogenic fungi against the two-spotted spider mite, Tetranychus urticae (Acari: Tetranychidae), on tomato, Lycopersicon Esculentum. Biocontrol Science and Technology 15, 3754.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chen, SC, Jiang, HY and Wang, XQ (2023) Efficacies of five pesticides on controlling Eotetranychus kankitus ehara at tea plantation. Acta Tea Sinica 64, 6064.Google Scholar
De Freitas, GS, Lira, VDA, Jumbo, LOV, Dos Santos, FJ, Rêgo, AS and Teodoro, AV (2021) The potential of Beauveria bassiana to control Raoiella indica (Acari: Tenuipalpidae) and its compatibility with predatory mites. Crop Protection 149, 105776.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Faraji, F, Janssen, A and Sabelis, MW (2001) Predatory mites avoid ovipositing near counterattacking prey. Experimental and Applied Acarology 25, 613623.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Flexner, JL, Lighthart, B and Croft, BA (1986) The effects of microbial pesticides on non-target, beneficial arthropods. Agriculture Ecosystems and Environment 16, 203254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Geroh, M, Gulati, R, and Tehri, K (2015) Determination of lethal concentration and lethal time of entomopathogen Beauveria bassiana (Balsamo) Vuillemin against Tetranychus urticae Koch. International Journal of Agriculture Sciences 7, 523528.Google Scholar
Koehler, HH (1999) Predatory mites (Gamasina, Mesostigmata). Agriculture Ecosystems and Environment 74, 395410.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krishnan, S, Kaushik, HD, Gulati, R, and Sharma, SS (2012) Evaluation of Beauveria bassiana (Balsamo) Vuillemin against Aphis craccivora (Koch) (Aphididae: Homoptera). Biopesticides International 8, 125130.Google Scholar
Li, YJ, Wang, ZY, Zhang, GH and Liu, H (2014) Effects of different temperatures on the growth and development of Eotetranychus kankitus (Ehara). Acta Ecologica Sinica 34, 826868.Google Scholar
Li, YY, Liu, MX, Zhou, HW, Tian, CB, Zhang, GH, Liu, YQ, Liu, H, and Wang, JJ (2017) Evaluation of Neoseiulus barkeri (Acari: Phytoseiidae) for control of Eotetranychus kankitus (Acari: Tetranychidae). Journal of Economic Entomology 110, 903914.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lin, GY, Tanguay, A, Guertin, C, Todorova, S and Brodeur, J (2017) A new method for loading predatory mites with entomopathogenic fungi for biological control of their prey. Biological Control 115, 105111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Niu, TD, Nima, YZ, Li, GY, Yang, BW, Chen, HQ, Li, YY and Liu, H (2023) A spätzle protein involved in the immune response of Neoseiulus barkeri (Acari: Phytoseiidae) against Beauveria bassiana. Systematic and Applied Acarology 28, 556567.Google Scholar
Numa Vergel, SJ, Bustos, RA, Rodríguez, CD and Cantor, RF (2011) Laboratory and greenhouse evaluation of the entomopathogenic fungi and garlic–pepper extract on the predatory mites, Phytoseiulus persimilis and Neoseiulus californicus and their effect on the spider mite Tetranychus urticae. Biological Control 57, 143149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ríos-Moreno, A, Quesada-Moraga, E and Garrido-Jurado, I (2018) Treatments with Metarhizium brunneum BIPESCO5 and EAMa 01/58-Su strains (Ascomycota: Hypocreales) are low risk for the generalist predator Chrysoperla carnea. Journal of Pest Science 91, 385394.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rondot, Y and Reineke, A (2017) Association of Beauveria bassiana with grapevine plants deters adult black vine weevils, Otiorhynchus sulcatus. Biocontrol Science and Technology 27, 811820.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sarasan, V, Kite, GC, Sileshi, GW and Stevenson, PC (2011) Applications of phytochemical and in vitro techniques for reducing over-harvesting of medicinal and pesticidal plants and generating income for the rural poor. Plant Cell Reports 30, 11631172.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Seiedy, M (2014) Feeding preference of Phytoseiulus persimilis Athias-Henriot (Acari: Phytosei-idae) towards untreated and Beauveria bassiana-treated Tetranychus urticae (Acari: Tetranychidae) on cucumber leaves. Persian Journal of Acarology 3, 9197.Google Scholar
Seiedy, M (2015) Compatibility of Amblyseius swirskii (Acari: Phytoseiidae) and Beauveria bassiana for biological control of Trialeurodes vaporariorum (Hemiptera: Aleyrodidae). Systematic and Applied Acarology 20, 732738.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Seiedy, M, Saboori, A and Allahyari, H (2012a) Interactions of two natural enemies of Tetranychus urticae, the fungal entomopathogen Beauveria bassiana and the predatory mite, Phytoseiulus persimilis. Biocontrol Science and Technology 22, 873882.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Seiedy, M, Saboori, A, Allahyari, H, Talaei-Hassanloui, R, and Tork, M (2012b) Functional response of Phytoseiulus persimilis (Acari: Phytoseiidae) on untreated and Beauveria bassiana - treated adults of Tetranychus urticae (Acari: Tetranychidae). Journal of Insect Behavior 25, 543553. 10.1007/s10905-012-9322-z.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shah, PA and Pell, JK (2003) Entomopathogenic fungi as biological control agents. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology 61, 413423.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shi, WB and Feng, MG (2006) Field efficacy of application of Beauveria bassiana formulation and low rate pyridaben for sustainable control of citrus red mite Panonychus citri (Acari: Tetranychidae) in orchards. Biological Control 39, 210217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shipp, JL, Zhang, Y, Hunt, DWA and Ferguson, G (2003) Influence of humidity and greenhouse microclimate on the efficacy of Beauveria bassiana (Balsamo) for control of greenhouse arthropod pests. Environmental Entomology 32, 11541163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sohrabi, F, Jamali, F, Morammazi, S, Saber, M and Kamita, SG (2019) Evaluation of the compatibility of entomopathogenic fungi and two botanical insecticides tondexir and palizin for controlling Galleria mellonella L. (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae). Crop Protection 117, 2025.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ullah, MS, and Lim, UT (2017) Laboratory evaluation of the effect of Beauveria bassiana on the predatory mite Phytoseiulus persimilis (Acari: Phytoseiidae). Journal of Invertebrate Pathology 148, 102109.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Walzer, A, Paulus, H and Schausberger, P (2006) Oviposition behavior of interacting predatory mites: Response to the presence of con- and heterospecific eggs. Journal of Insect Behavior 19, 305320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wang, XQ, Ran, L and Duan, XF (2014) Study on novel tea plant pest mite, Eotetranychus kankitus (Ehara). Southwest China Journal of Agricultural Sciences 27, 24232427.Google Scholar
Wekesa, VW, Maniania, NK, Knapp, M and Boga, HI (2005) Pathogenicity of Beauveria bassiana and Metarhizium anisopliae to the tobacco spider mite Tetranychus evansi. Experimental and Applied Acarology 36, 4150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wekesa, VW, Moraes, GJ, Knapp, M, and Delalibera, I (2007) Interactions of two natural enemies of Tetranychus evansi, the fungal pathogen Neozygites floridana (Zygomycetes: Entomophthorales) and the predatory mite, Phytoseiulus longipes (Acari: Phytoseiidae). Biological Control 41, 408414.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wu, SY, Gao, YL, Xu, XN, Goettel, MS and Lei, ZR (2015a) Compatibility of Beauveria bassiana with Neoseiulus barkeri for control of Frankliniella occidentalis. Journal of Integrative Agriculture 14, 98105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wu, SY, Gao, YL, Xu, XN, Wang, DJ, Li, J, Wang, HH, Wang, ED and Lei, ZR (2015b) Feeding on Beauveria bassiana-treated Frankliniella occidentalis causes negative effects on the predatory mite Neoseiulus barkeri. Scientific Reports 5, 12033.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wu, SY, Gao, YL, Zhang, YP, Wang, ED, Xu, XN and Lei, ZR (2014) An entomopathogenic strain of Beauveria bassiana against Frankliniella occidentalis with no detrimental effect on the predatory mite Neoseiulus barkeri: evidence from laboratory bioassay and scanning electron microscopic observation. Plos One 9, e84732.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wu, SY, Guo, JF, Xing, ZL, Gao, YL, Xu, XN and Lei, ZR (2018a) Comparison of mechanical properties for mite cuticles in understanding passive defense of phytoseiid mite against fungal infection. Materials & Design 140, 241248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wu, SY, Sarkar, SC, Lv, JL, Xu, XN and Lei, ZR (2020) Poor infectivity of Beauveria bassiana to eggs and immatures causes the failure of suppression on Tetranychus urticae population. BioControl 65, 8190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wu, SY, Xie, HC, Li, MY, Xu, XN and Lei, ZR (2016a) Highly virulent Beauveria bassiana strains against the two-spotted spider mite, Tetranychus urticae, show no pathogenicity against five phytoseiid mite species. Experimental and Applied Acarology 70, 421435.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wu, SY, Xing, ZL, Sun, WN, Xu, XN, Meng, RX and Lei, ZR (2018b) Effects of Beauveria bassiana on predation and behavior of the predatory mite Phytoseiulus persimilis. Journal of Invertebrate Pathology 153, 5156.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wu, SY, Zhang, Y, Xu, XN and Lei, ZR (2016b) Insight into the feeding behavior of predatory mites on Beauveria bassiana, an arthropod pathogen. Scientific Reports 6, 24062.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zhang, XR, Wu, SY, Reitz, SR and Gao, YL (2021) Simultaneous application of entomopathogenic Beauveria bassiana granules and predatory mites Stratiolaelaps scimitus for control of western flower thrips, Frankliniella occidentalis. Journal of Pest Science 94, 119127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhang, YX, Sun, L, Lin, GY, Lin, JZ, Chen, X, Ji, J, Zhang, Z and Saito, Y (2015) A novel use of predatory mites for dissemination of fungal pathogen for insect biocontrol: the case of Amblyseius swirskii and Neoseiulus cucumeris (Phytoseiidae) as vectors of Beauveria bassiana against Diaphorina citri (Psyllidae). Systematic & Applied Acarology 20, 177187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhou, L, Yue, BS and Zou, FD (1999) Life table studies of Eotetranychus kankitus (Acari: Tetranychidae) at different temperatures. Systematic and Applied Acarology 4, 6973.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Figure 0

Figure 1. Cumulative corrected mortality rate (mean ± SE) of Eotetranychus kankitus females caused by five isolates of B. bassiana, including Bb02, Bb014, Bb025, Bb062, and Bb252.

Figure 1

Table 1 Lethal time (LT50) estimations of five B. bassiana in E. kankitus

Figure 2

Figure 2. Cumulative corrected mortality rate (mean ± SE) of Eotetranychus kankitus (a) and Neoseiulus barkeri (b) females caused by Bb025 at different concentrations of conidia.

Figure 3

Table 2 Lethal concentration (LC50) estimations of B. bassiana isolate Bb025 on the E. kankitus and N. barkeri

Figure 4

Table 3 Lethal time (LT50) estimations of B. bassiana isolate Bb025 on the E. kankitus and N. barkeri

Figure 5

Figure 3. Preference of Eoteranchus kankitus (a) and Neoseiulus barkeri (b) to citrus leaflets inoculated with Bb025 (1 × 108 conidia/mL) and 0.05% Tween-80. Data were analysed using a chi-squared test to evaluate differences in each choice experiment (P < 0.05). The asterisk indicates significant differences between Bb025 and Tween-80 treatments.

Figure 6

Figure 4. Grooming frequency (a), grooming time (b) and moving time (c) of Neoseiulus barkeri on citrus leaflets inoculated with Bb025 (1 × 108 conidia/mL) and 0.05% Tween-80. The ‘ns’ and asterisk indicate no significant and significant differences, respectively, between Bb025 and Tween-80 treatments, based on an independent-samples t-test (P < 0.05).

Figure 7

Figure 5. Frequency of predatory tendencies of Neoseiulus barkeri towards Eoteranchus kankitus eggs over a 10-minute period (a) and the number of E. kankitus eggs consumed by N. barkeri within 2 hours (b) on citrus leaflets inoculated with Bb025 (1 × 108 conidia/mL) and 0.05% Tween-80. The ‘ns’ indicates no significant differences between Bb025 and Tween-80 treatments, based on an independent-samples t-test (P < 0.05).

Figure 8

Figure 6. The number of Eoteranchus kankitus inoculated with Bb025 (1 × 108 conidia/mL) and 0.05% Tween-80 that were consumed by Neoseiulus barkeri (a), along with the number of eggs laid by N. barkeri (b) and the number of new generation individuals of N. barkeri (c) after feeding on these treated E. kankitus. The ‘ns’ and asterisk indicate no significant and significant differences, respectively, between Bb025 and Tween-80 treatments, based on an independent-samples t-test (P < 0.05).

Supplementary material: File

Liu et al. supplementary material

Liu et al. supplementary material
Download Liu et al. supplementary material(File)
File 50.9 KB