Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-s22k5 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-11T01:40:27.118Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Acetylation and methylation profiles of H3K27 in porcine embryos cultured in vitro

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 July 2017

Luciana Simões Rafagnin Marinho
Affiliation:
Laboratory of Animal Reproduction, State University of Londrina (UEL), Rodovia Celso Garcia Cid, Km 380, s/n – Campus Universitário, CEP 86057–970, Londrina, PR, Brazil
Vitor Braga Rissi
Affiliation:
Laboratory of Biotechnology and Animal Reproduction – BioRep, Veterinary Hospital, Federal University of Santa Maria, Av. Roraima, 1000 – Camobi, CEP 97105–900, Santa Maria, RS, Brazil
Andressa Guidugli Lindquist
Affiliation:
Laboratory of Animal Reproduction, State University of Londrina (UEL), Rodovia Celso Garcia Cid, Km 380, s/n – Campus Universitário, CEP 86057–970, Londrina, PR, Brazil
Marcelo Marcondes Seneda*
Affiliation:
Laboratory of Animal Reproduction, State University of Londrina (UEL), Rodovia Celso Garcia Cid, Km 380, s/n – Campus Universitário, CEP 86057–970, Londrina, PR, Brazil.
Vilceu Bordignon
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Science, McGill University, 21111 Lakeshore Road, Sainte Anne de Bellevue, Quebec H9X 3V9, Canada
*
All correspondence to: Marcelo Marcondes Seneda. Laboratory of Animal Reproduction, State University of Londrina (UEL), Rodovia Celso Garcia Cid, Km 380, s/n – Campus Universitário, CEP 86057–970, Londrina, PR, Brazil. E-mail: marcelo.seneda@gmail.com
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Methylation and acetylation of histone H3 at lysine 27 (H3K27) regulate chromatin structure and gene expression during early embryo development. While H3K27 acetylation (H3K27ac) is associated with active gene expression, H3K27 methylation (H3K27me) is linked to transcriptional repression. The aim of this study was to assess the profile of H3K27 acetylation and methylation (mono-, di- and trimethyl) during oocyte maturation and early development in vitro of porcine embryos. Oocytes/embryos were fixed at different developmental stages from germinal vesicle to day 8 blastocysts and submitted to an immunocytochemistry protocol to identify the presence and quantify the immunofluorescence intensity of H3K27ac, H3K27me1, H3K27me2 and H3K27me3. A strong fluorescent signal for H3K27ac was observed in all developmental stages. H3K27me1 and H3K27me2 were detected in oocytes, but the fluorescent signal decreased through the cleavage stages and rose again at the blastocyst stage. H3K27me3 was detected in oocytes, in only one pronucleus in zygotes, cleaved-stage embryos and blastocysts. The nuclear fluorescence signal for H3K27me3 increased from the 2-cell stage to 4-cell stage embryos, decreased at the 8-cell and morula stages and increased again in blastocysts. Different patterns of the H3K27me3 mark were observed at the blastocyst stage. Our results suggest that changes in the H3K27 methylation status regulate early porcine embryo development as previously shown in other species.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2017 

Introduction

Normal embryo development involves important rearrangements in the chromatin structure. This change includes a global reprogramming of epigenetic marks starting following fertilization, which is required to create a totipotent state zygote (Fraser & Lin, Reference Fraser and Lin2016). Epigenetic marks are essential elements of the cell machinery that functionally interprets DNA sequences. These marks contribute to the establishment of cell identity by regulating gene expression patterns that are specific for each cell lineage (Chen & Pei, Reference Chen and Pei2016). In addition to regulate gene expression, epigenetic marks are also involved in the regulation of other critical events during embryogenesis in mammals, including genomic imprinting, inactivation of the X chromosome and reprogramming of the two parental haploid genomes into one diploid genome (Morris, Reference Morris2009; Hales et al., Reference Hales, Grenier, Lalancette and Robaire2011).

Important epigenetic marks involved in the regulation of early embryo development include DNA methylation, non-coding RNAs and post-translational modifications of specific residues in nucleosomal histones, such as acetylation and methylation (Novina & Sharp, Reference Novina and Sharp2004; Cook & Blelloch, Reference Cook and Blelloch2013; Beaujean, Reference Beaujean2014; Dallaire & Simard, Reference Dallaire and Simard2016; Ambrosi et al., Reference Ambrosi, Manzo and Baubec2017). Histone acetylation usually occurs on the lysine residues of core histones and neutralizes the basic charge of these residues, therefore decreasing their affinity for DNA (Hasan & Hottiger, Reference Hasan and Hottiger2002). Histone acetylation is almost invariably associated with activation of gene transcription, and is involved in the regulation of cell totipotency and proliferation events during cell reprogramming and embryo development (Wang et al., Reference Wang, Kou, Zhang and Gao2007; Rodriguez-Sanz et al., Reference Rodriguez-Sanz, Moreno-Romero, Solis, Kohler, Risueno and Testillano2014). For instance, acetylation of histone H3 at lysine 27 (H3K27ac) plays an important role in the maintenance of pluripotency and regulation of key developmental genes in stem cells (Creyghton et al., Reference Creyghton, Cheng, Welstead, Kooistra, Carey, Steine, Hanna, Lodato, Frampton and Sharp2010; Pasini et al., Reference Pasini, Malatesta, Jung, Walfridsson, Willer, Olsson, Skotte, Wutz, Porse and Jensen2010).

Conversely, methylation of H3K27 (H3K27me) is usually associated with transcriptional repression, promoting stable and heritable gene silencing (Schwartz & Pirrotta, Reference Schwartz and Pirrotta2007). Trimethylation of H3K27 (H3K27me3) regulates lineage specification by temporarily repressing genes involved in development and cell differentiation of pluripotent cells (Surface et al., Reference Surface, Thornton and Boyer2010; Shpargel et al., Reference Shpargel, Starmer, Yee, Pohlers and Magnuson2014). Indeed, genes associated to organogenesis, morphogenesis and embryonic development are temporarily suppressed by H3K27me3 until the time when their transcription is required (Boyer et al., Reference Boyer, Plath, Zeitlinger, Brambrink, Medeiros, Lee, Levine, Wernig, Tajonar and Ray2006).

It is well established that mammalian embryos undergo several epigenetic modifications during early development (Boland et al., Reference Boland, Nazor and Loring2014). Nonetheless, the regulatory mechanism of lineage commitment is still not fully known. Understanding how different species organize their chromatin following fertilization is fundamental for comprehending the epigenetic regulation of early embryonic development and may help to determine improved conditions for in vitro embryo production. Therefore, the objective of this study was to evaluate the profile of acetylation and methylation of histone H3 at lysine 27 during oocyte maturation and early development in vitro of porcine embryos.

Materials and Methods

Unless otherwise indicated, chemicals were purchased from Sigma Chemical Company (Sigma-Aldrich, Oakville, ON, Canada).

Oocyte collection and in vitro maturation

Ovaries from prepubertal gilts were collected from a local abattoir and transported to the laboratory in 0.9% NaCl at 30 to 35°C. Cumulus–oocyte complexes (COCs) were aspirated from 3-mm to 6-mm diameter follicles using an 18-gauge needle. Only COCs surrounded by a minimum of three cumulus-cell layers, with an evenly granulated cytoplasm were selected for in vitro maturation (IVM). Groups of 20 to 25 COCs were cultured in 100 µl of maturation medium under mineral oil, in a humidified atmosphere of 5% CO2 and 95% air at 38.5°C. Maturation medium consisted of TCM-199 (Life Technologies, Burlington, ON, Canada), supplemented with 0.1 mg/ml cysteine, 0.91 mM sodium pyruvate, 3.05 mM d-glucose, 0.5 µg/ml follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH; SIOUX Biochemical Inc.), 0.5 µg/ml luteinizing hormone (LH, SIOUX Biochemical Inc.), 10 ng/ml epidermal growth factor (EGF; Life Technologies), 20 µg/ml gentamicin (Life Technologies), 1 mM dibutyryl cyclic adenosine monophosphate (dbcAMP), and 20% (v/v) porcine follicular fluid. After 22 h, the oocytes were transferred to the same maturation medium, but without FSH, LH, and dbcAMP for an additional 22 to 24 h, under the same conditions.

In vitro fertilization (IVF) and in vitro culture (IVC)

Matured oocytes were freed from cumulus cells by vortexing in TCM 199 HEPES-buffered medium (Life Technologies) supplemented with 0.1% hyaluronidase for 7 min. The denuded oocytes were washed in the same medium before being transferred to fertilization medium.

The oocytes were washed twice in fertilization medium, which consisted of Tris-buffered medium (TBM) supplemented with 2.5 mg/ml fatty acid-free bovine serum albumin (BSA), and placed in 90 µl drops of the same medium. A pool of fresh semen collected from 3–4 fertile boars was left at 18°C for 24 h and then centrifuged at 4000 rpm for 3 min. Supernatant was discarded and the sperm pellet was re-suspended in 1 ml of fertilization medium and homogenized. The semen was centrifuged again (4000 rpm for 2 min), the supernatant was discarded and the sperm pellet was re-suspended in 500 µl of fertilization medium. Sperm concentration was adjusted to obtain a final concentration of 2,000 live sperm/oocyte. Sperm and oocytes were co-incubated for 4 h under mineral oil at 38.5°C, in 5% CO2 in air and 100% humidity.

After IVF, the oocytes were washed three times in porcine zygote medium (PZM-3) supplemented with 3 mg/ml BSA and then cultured in the same medium under mineral oil. Culture conditions were humidified atmosphere of 5% CO2 and 95% air at 38.5°C. Cleavage and blastocyst rates were determined at 48 h and 7 days after IVF, respectively.

Immunocytochemistry

Oocytes/embryos were fixed at the following developmental stages: germinal vesicle (GV) and metaphase II (MII) oocytes, pronuclear (PN; 18 hours post fertilization – hpf), 2-cell stage (2C; 36 hpf), 4-cell stage (4C; 48 hpf), 8-cell stage (8C; 72 hpf), D6 blastocysts (D6; 144 hpf) and D8 blastocysts (D8; 192 hpf). Samples were rinsed in PBS, fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde for 15 to 20 min and stored at 4°C in PBS with 0.2% TritonX-100 and 0.3% BSA. Cell permeabilization was performed with 0.5% Triton X-100 in PBS with 0.3% BSA for 1 h at 37°C. Oocytes/embryos were then washed twice (10 min each) in blocking solution (3% BSA and 0.2% Tween-20 in PBS) and exposed overnight at 4°C to primary antibodies diluted in blocking solution (1:1000). Polyclonal rabbit anti-H3K27 acetyl (Abcam; ab4729), anti-monomethyl H3K27 (Upstate; 07–448), anti-dimethyl H3K27 (Upstate; 07–452), and anti-trimethyl H3K27 (Upstate; 07–449) were used as primary antibodies. Samples were then washed three times for 20 min each in blocking solution and incubated for 2 h at room temperature in the presence of 1:1000 diluted Alexa Flour 488 goat anti-rabbit (Molecular Probes, Eugene, OR, USA) secondary antibodies. Finally, the samples were washed three times (20 min each) in blocking solution. For the second wash, the solution was supplemented with 10 µg/ml DAPI (4´,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole) for DNA staining. Oocytes/embryos were mounted on microscope slides using a drop of Mowiol and examined by epifluorescence using a Nikon eclipse 80i microscope (Nikon, Tokyo, Japan) with ×200 magnification. Images were individually recorded using a Retiga 2000R monochrome digital camera (Qimaging, BC, Canada). The exposure gains and rates were consistent between samples. Fluorescence intensities were quantified by using Image J analysis (Schneider et al., Reference Schneider, Rasband and Eliceiri2012). Control samples from each developmental stage were processed as described above, but the primary antibody was omitted. Images from 183 oocytes/embryos were analyzed.

Results

H3K27ac was detected in the nuclei of GV and in the DNA of MII oocytes. Strong fluorescent signals were observed in both PN and in 2C and 4C stages. The fluorescent signal decreased at the 8C stage but increased again in D6 and D8 blastocysts (Figs 1 and 2).

Figure 1 Distribution of acetylated, mono-, di- and tri-methylated H3K27 in porcine oocytes and embryos. Panels show representative images of immature (GV stage) and mature (MII stage) oocytes, zygotes (PN stage), 2-cell (2C), 4-cell (4C) and 8-cell (8C) stage embryos, and day 6 (D6) and day 8 (D8) blastocysts.

Figure 2 Fluorescence intensity for H3K27ac (A), H3K27me1 (B), H3K27me2 (C) and H3K27me3 (D) in porcine oocytes and developing embryos. GV = germinal vesicle oocytes, MII = metaphase II oocytes, PN = pronuclear stage zygotes, 2C = two-cell stage embryos, 4C = four-cell stage embryos, 8C = eight-cell stage embryos, D6 = day 6 blastocysts, D8 = day 8 blastocysts.

The fluorescent signal for H3K27me1 was intense in GV and MII oocytes, but decreased markedly in cleaved-stage embryos. The fluorescent signal was barely detectable in zygotes, 2C, 4C and 8C embryos, but intensity increased in D6 and D8 blastocysts (Figs 1 and 2).

H3K27me2 revealed a strong fluorescent signal in GV and MII stage oocytes, but very weak or absent signal in PN of zygotes. Cleaved-stage embryos showed weak or no fluorescent signal for H3K27me2, but all nuclei were H3K27me2 positive in D6 and D8 blastocysts (Figs 1 and 2).

Strong fluorescence intensity for H3K27me3 was detected in GV and MII oocytes. In zygotes, only one of the pronuclei was H3K27me3 positive (Fig. 3). H3K27me3 signal was detected in 2C and 4C stages, but 8C embryos and D6 blastocysts showed very weak or no fluorescent signal (Figs 1 and 2). The fluorescent pattern in D8 blastocyst varied from absence of fluorescent signal (7 embryos), mixture of fluorescent positive and negative cells (19 embryos), to only inner cell mass (ICM) positive staining (three embryos; Fig. 4).

Figure 3 H3K27me3 immunofluorescence image of a polyspermic zygote showing one stained and two non-stained PNs. (1) DNA stained with DAPI. (2) H3K27me3 fluorescent signal.

Figure 4 H3K27me3 immunofluorescence image day 8 blastocysts. (1) Embryo with absence or weak H3K27me3 fluorescent signal. (2) Embryo with strong H3K27me3 fluorescent signal in all the cells. (3) Embryo with strong H3K27me3 fluorescent signal only in the ICM cells.

Discussion

Epigenetic changes are known to regulate the programming of the genetic information carried over by the oocyte and the sperm to the new developing embryo and control totipotency and cell lineage commitment (Lu & Zhang, Reference Lu and Zhang2015; Ancelin et al., Reference Ancelin, Syx, Borensztein, Ranisavljevic, Vassilev, Briseno-Roa, Liu, Metzger, Servant and Barillot2016). To gain additional insights into the epigenetics changes that occur at early embryo stages we have evaluated the global profile of H3K27 acetylation, mono-, di-, and trimethylation during in vitro development of porcine embryos. H3K27 methylation is catalyzed by the transcriptional repressors Polycomb group (PcG) proteins, which form two chromatin modifying complexes, Polycomb Repressive Complex 1 and Complex 2 (PRC1 and PRC2) (O'Meara & Simon, Reference O'Meara and Simon2012; Williams et al., Reference Williams, Christensen, Rappsilber, Nielsen, Johansen and Helin2014). Removal of this epigenetic mark can make undifferentiated normal (Patel et al., Reference Patel, Tursun, Rahe and Hobert2012) or cancerous cells (Gannon et al., Reference Gannon, De Long, Endo-Munoz, Hazar-Rethinam and Saunders2013; Ciarapica et al., Reference Ciarapica, Carcarino, Adesso, De Salvo, Bracaglia, Leoncini, Dall'agnese, Verginelli, Milano and Boldrini2014) susceptible to differentiation. H3K27me3 is a Polycomb repressed state, which is functionally opposed by actively transcribed chromatin (O'Meara & Simon, Reference O'Meara and Simon2012). Conversely, H3K27ac is generally enriched in promoters of active genes (Tie et al., Reference Tie, Banerjee, Stratton, Prasad-Sinha, Stepanik, Zlobin, Diaz, Scacheri and Harte2009; O'Meara & Simon, Reference O'Meara and Simon2012) and can antagonize PcG activity by competing with the placement of the H3K27me3 mark (Schwartz et al., Reference Schwartz, Kahn, Stenberg, Ohno, Bourgon and Pirrotta2010). Consistent with this, it has been shown that H3K27ac and H3K27me3 have dynamic and complementary temporal profiles during embryogenesis (Tie et al., Reference Tie, Banerjee, Stratton, Prasad-Sinha, Stepanik, Zlobin, Diaz, Scacheri and Harte2009).

In this study, H3K27me3 was detected in immature and matured oocytes, which is in accordance with others studies in pigs (Park et al., Reference Park, Magnani and Cabot2009; Cao et al., Reference Cao, Li, Chen, Wang, Zhang, Zhou, Wu, Ling, Fang and Li2015; Xie et al., Reference Xie, Zhang, Wei, Li, Weng, Kong and Liu2016) and cattle (Ross et al., Reference Ross, Ragina, Rodriguez, Iager, Siripattarapravat, Lopez-Corrales and Cibelli2008). In zygotes, only one of the two pronuclei was positive for this mark. A similar pattern of H3K27me3 staining in zygotes was reported in other studies in pigs (Young et al., Reference Young, Yeo, Jung, Lee and Kang2007; Park et al., Reference Park, Magnani and Cabot2009), cattle (Breton et al., Reference Breton, LE Bourhis, Audouard, Vignon and Lelièvre2010) and mice (Erhardt et al., Reference Erhardt, Su, Schneider, Barton, Bannister, Perez-Burgos, Jenuwein, Kouzarides, Tarakhovsky and Surani2003; Santos et al., Reference Santos, Peters, Otte, Reik and Dean2005). We believe that the H3K27me3 positive was the female PN given that polyspermic zygotes having more than two PNs also contained only one positive PN. However, Ross et al. (Reference Ross, Ragina, Rodriguez, Iager, Siripattarapravat, Lopez-Corrales and Cibelli2008) observed an asymmetric staining pattern in bovine embryos at PN stage and proposed that the female PN was the one positive for H3K27me3. They have also observed that both pronuclei in parthenogenetically activated embryos were H3K27me3 positive, which further confirms that the positive PN in fertilized zygotes is derived from the oocyte.

We have observed that the fluorescent intensity for H3K27me3 decreases at the 8-cell stage. This finding is in line with other reports in porcine (Park et al., Reference Park, Magnani and Cabot2009) and bovine embryos (Ross et al., Reference Ross, Ragina, Rodriguez, Iager, Siripattarapravat, Lopez-Corrales and Cibelli2008; Breton et al., Reference Breton, LE Bourhis, Audouard, Vignon and Lelièvre2010). Interestingly, we observed different patterns of H3K27me3 fluorescent staining in D8 blastocysts, which included embryos with no stained cells, embryos with a mix of positive and negative cells, embryos with all the cells stained, and embryos with only the ICM stained. A previous study by Park et al. (Reference Park, Magnani and Cabot2009) did not detect H3K27me3 in porcine blastocysts at D6 of development (144 hpf). Conversely, Gao et al., (Reference Gao, Hyttel and Hall2010) reported that levels of H3K27me3 increased in hatched blastocysts. Along with our observations, data from those studies suggest that H3K27me3 pattern in porcine blastocysts may differ from other species given that intense fluorescence signal for H3K27me3 was found in bovine (Ross et al., Reference Ross, Ragina, Rodriguez, Iager, Siripattarapravat, Lopez-Corrales and Cibelli2008) and murine (Erhardt et al., Reference Erhardt, Su, Schneider, Barton, Bannister, Perez-Burgos, Jenuwein, Kouzarides, Tarakhovsky and Surani2003) blastocysts.

Monomethylated H3K27 was detectable in GV and MII stage oocytes, which is in agreement with a previous study in porcine embryos (Park et al., Reference Park, Magnani and Cabot2009). However, we observed that H3K27me1 was present in only one PN, while similar fluorescent signal in both PNs was reported in the previous study (Park et al., Reference Park, Magnani and Cabot2009). As H3K27me1 becomes detectable in the male pronucleus several hours after fertilization, one possibility is that the pronuclear development stage of zygotes evaluated in our study was different from the previous study. In mice, H3K27me1 signal is mainly present in the female PN (Erhardt et al., Reference Erhardt, Su, Schneider, Barton, Bannister, Perez-Burgos, Jenuwein, Kouzarides, Tarakhovsky and Surani2003; Van Der Heijden et al., Reference Van Der Heijden, Dieker, Derijck, Muller, Berden, Braat, Van Der Vlag and De Boer2005), but the signal increased during male PN formation (Erhardt et al., Reference Erhardt, Su, Schneider, Barton, Bannister, Perez-Burgos, Jenuwein, Kouzarides, Tarakhovsky and Surani2003; Santos et al., Reference Santos, Peters, Otte, Reik and Dean2005; Van Der Heijden et al., Reference Van Der Heijden, Dieker, Derijck, Muller, Berden, Braat, Van Der Vlag and De Boer2005). The H3K27me1signal from 2C to the blastocyst stage observed in this study corroborates with findings from a previous study (Park et al., Reference Park, Magnani and Cabot2009).

We observed absence or weak fluorescent intensity for H3K27me2 in zygotes, which differs from previous studies in mice reporting intensive H3K27me2 signal in PNs of mice zygotes (Erhardt et al., Reference Erhardt, Su, Schneider, Barton, Bannister, Perez-Burgos, Jenuwein, Kouzarides, Tarakhovsky and Surani2003). Conversely, we observed a prominent fluorescent signal for H3K27me2 in D6 and D8 IVF blastocysts, while another study reported that H3K27me2 levels were nearly undetectable in porcine blastocysts produced by parthenogenetic activation (Huang et al., Reference Huang, Yuan, Li, Wang, Li, Pang, Wang and Ouyang2015). Differences between fertilized and parthenogenetic embryos have been reported regarding other histone modifications including H3K9ac and H3K27ac (Huang et al., Reference Huang, Yuan, Li, Wang, Li, Pang, Wang and Ouyang2015).

Intensive fluorescent signal for H3K27ac was observed in oocytes, in both PNs of zygotes, and all developmental stages from 2C to blastocyst. However, the intensity of the fluorescent signal decreased in 8C-stage embryos. A similar pattern of H3K27ac in porcine embryos was reported in a previous study by Zhou et al. (Reference Zhou, Cao, Wu, Liu, Tao, Chen, Song, Han, Li and Fang2014).

In summary, our study revealed that the global pattern of acetylation and mono-, di- and trimethylation of the H3K27 changes during in vitro development of porcine embryos. Based on published literature, our findings suggest that porcine embryos produced by IVF may differ from embryos of other species regarding the global changes in H3K27, including the pattern of H3K27me3 at the blastocyst stage and H3K27me2 in zygotes. Our findings may provide a base for further investigation of the mechanistic relevance of each epigenetic change occurring in the H3K27 for the regulation of early embryo development.

References

Ambrosi, C., Manzo, M. & Baubec, T. (2017). Dynamics and context-dependent roles of DNA methylation. J. Mol. Biol. 429, 1459–75.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ancelin, K., Syx, L., Borensztein, M., Ranisavljevic, N., Vassilev, I., Briseno-Roa, L., Liu, T., Metzger, E., Servant, N., Barillot, E., et al. (2016). Maternal LSD1/KDM1A is an essential regulator of chromatin and transcription landscapes during zygotic genome activation. Elife 5, pii: e08851.Google Scholar
Beaujean, N. (2014). Histone post-translational modifications in preimplantation mouse embryos and their role in nuclear architecture. Mol. Reprod. Dev. 81, 100–12.Google Scholar
Boland, M.J., Nazor, K.L. & Loring, J.F. (2014). Epigenetic regulation of pluripotency and differentiation. Circ. Res. 115, 311324.Google Scholar
Boyer, L.A., Plath, K., Zeitlinger, J., Brambrink, T., Medeiros, L.A., Lee, T.I., Levine, S.S., Wernig, M., Tajonar, A., Ray, M.K., et al. (2006). Polycomb complexes repress developmental regulators in murine embryonic stem cells. Nature 441, 349–53.Google Scholar
Breton, A., LE Bourhis, D., Audouard, C., Vignon, X. & Lelièvre, J.-M. (2010). Nuclear profiles of H3 histones trimethylated on Lys27 in bovine (Bos taurus) embryos obtained after in vitro fertilization or somatic cell nuclear transfer. J. Reprod. Dev. 56, 379–88.Google Scholar
Cao, Z., Li, Y., Chen, Z., Wang, H., Zhang, M., Zhou, N., Wu, R., Ling, Y., Fang, F., Li, N., et al. (2015). Genome-wide dynamic profiling of histone methylation during nuclear transfer-mediated porcine somatic cell reprogramming. PLoS One 10, e0144897.Google Scholar
Chen, J. & Pei, D. (2016). Epigenetic landmarks during somatic reprogramming. IUBMB Life 68, 854–7.Google Scholar
Ciarapica, R., Carcarino, E., Adesso, L., De Salvo, M., Bracaglia, G., Leoncini, P.P., Dall'agnese, A., Verginelli, F., Milano, G.M., Boldrini, R., et al. (2014). Pharmacological inhibition of EZH2 as a promising differentiation therapy in embryonal RMS. BMC Cancer 14, 139.Google Scholar
Cook, M.S. & Blelloch, R. (2013). Small RNAs in germline development. Curr. Top. Dev. Biol. 102, 159205.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Creyghton, M.P., Cheng, A.W., Welstead, G.G., Kooistra, T., Carey, B.W., Steine, E.J., Hanna, J., Lodato, M. a, Frampton, G.M., Sharp, P.A., et al. (2010). Histone H3K27ac separates active from poised enhancers and predicts developmental state. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 107, 21931–6.Google Scholar
Dallaire, A. & Simard, M.J. (2016). The implication of microRNAs and endo-siRNAs in animal germline and early development. Dev. Biol. 416, 1825.Google Scholar
Erhardt, S., Su, I.-H., Schneider, R., Barton, S., Bannister, A.J., Perez-Burgos, L., Jenuwein, T., Kouzarides, T., Tarakhovsky, A. & Surani, M.A. (2003). Consequences of the depletion of zygotic and embryonic enhancer of zeste 2 during preimplantation mouse development. Development 130, 4235–48.Google Scholar
Fraser, R. & Lin, C.-J. (2016). Epigenetic reprogramming of the zygote in mice and men: on your marks, get set, go! Reproduction 152, R211–22.Google Scholar
Gannon, O.M., De Long, L.M., Endo-Munoz, L., Hazar-Rethinam, M. & Saunders, N.A. (2013). Dysregulation of the repressive H3K27 trimethylation mark in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma contributes to dysregulated squamous differentiation. Clin. Cancer Res. 19, 428– 41.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gao, Y., Hyttel, P. & Hall, V.J. (2010). Regulation of H3K27me3 and H3K4me3 during early porcine embryonic development. Mol. Reprod. Dev. 77, 540–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hales, B.F., Grenier, L., Lalancette, C. & Robaire, B. (2011). Epigenetic programming: From gametes to blastocyst. Birth Defects Res. Part A - Clin. Mol. Teratol. 91, 652– 65.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hasan, S. & Hottiger, M.O. (2002). Histone acetyl transferases: a role in DNA repair and DNA replication. J. Mol. Med. 80, 463–74.Google Scholar
Huang, Y., Yuan, L., Li, T., Wang, A., Li, Z., Pang, D., Wang, B. & Ouyang, H. (2015). Valproic acid improves porcine parthenogenetic embryo development through transient remodeling of histone modifiers. Cell. Physiol. Biochem. 37, 1463–73.Google Scholar
Lu, F. & Zhang, Y. (2015). Cell totipotency: molecular features, induction, and maintenance. Natl. Sci. Rev. 2, 217–25.Google Scholar
Morris, K. (2009). Non-coding RNAs, epigenetic memory and the passage of information to progeny. RNA Biol. 6, 242–7.Google Scholar
Novina, C.D. & Sharp, P.A. (2004). The RNAi revolution. Nature 430, 161–4.Google Scholar
O'Meara, M.M. & Simon, J.A. (2012). Inner workings and regulatory inputs that control Polycomb repressive complex 2. Chromosoma 121, 221–34.Google Scholar
Park, K.E., Magnani, L. & Cabot, R.A. (2009). Differential remodeling of mono- and trimethylated H3K27 during porcine embryo development. Mol. Reprod. Dev. 76, 1033–42.Google Scholar
Pasini, D., Malatesta, M., Jung, H.R., Walfridsson, J., Willer, A., Olsson, L., Skotte, J., Wutz, A., Porse, B., Jensen, O.N., et al. (2010). Characterization of an antagonistic switch between histone H3 lysine 27 methylation and acetylation in the transcriptional regulation of Polycomb group target genes. Nucleic Acids Res. 38, 4958–69.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Patel, T., Tursun, B., Rahe, D.P. & Hobert, O. (2012). Removal of Polycomb repressive complex 2 makes C. elegans germ cells susceptible to direct conversion into specific somatic cell types. Cell Rep. 2, 1178–86.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rodriguez-Sanz, H., Moreno-Romero, J., Solis, M.-T., Kohler, C., Risueno, M.C. & Testillano, P.S. (2014). Changes in histone methylation and acetylation during microspore reprogramming to embryogenesis occur concomitantly with Bn HKMT and Bn HAT expression and are associated with cell totipotency, proliferation & differentiation in Brassica napus . Cytogenet. Genome Res. 143, 209–18.Google Scholar
Ross, P.J., Ragina, N.P., Rodriguez, R.M., Iager, A.E., Siripattarapravat, K., Lopez-Corrales, N. & Cibelli, J.B. (2008). Polycomb gene expression and histone H3 lysine 27 trimethylation changes during bovine preimplantation development. Reproduction 136, 777–85.Google Scholar
Santos, F., Peters, A.H., Otte, A.P., Reik, W. & Dean, W. (2005). Dynamic chromatin modifications characterise the first cell cycle in mouse embryos. Dev. Biol. 280, 225236.Google Scholar
Schneider, C.A., Rasband, W.S. & Eliceiri, K.W. (2012). NIH Image to ImageJ: 25 years of image analysis. Nat. Methods 9, 671–5.Google Scholar
Schwartz, Y.B. & Pirrotta, V. (2007). Polycomb silencing mechanisms and the management of genomic programmes. Nat. Rev. Genet. 8, 922.Google Scholar
Schwartz, Y.B., Kahn, T.G., Stenberg, P., Ohno, K., Bourgon, R. & Pirrotta, V. (2010). Alternative epigenetic chromatin states of Polycomb target genes. PLoS Genet. 6, e1000805.Google Scholar
Shpargel, K.B., Starmer, J., Yee, D., Pohlers, M. & Magnuson, T. (2014). KDM6 demethylase independent loss of histone H3 lysine 27 trimethylation during early embryonic development. PLoS Genet. 10, e1004507.Google Scholar
Surface, L.E., Thornton, S.R. & Boyer, L.A. (2010). Polycomb group proteins set the stage for early lineage commitment. Cell Stem Cell 7, 288–98.Google Scholar
Tie, F., Banerjee, R., Stratton, C. a, Prasad-Sinha, J., Stepanik, V., Zlobin, A., Diaz, M.O., Scacheri, P.C. & Harte, P.J. (2009). CBP-mediated acetylation of histone H3 lysine 27 antagonizes Drosophila Polycomb silencing. Development 136, 3131–41.Google Scholar
Van Der Heijden, G.W., Dieker, J.W., Derijck, A.A.H.A., Muller, S., Berden, J.H.M., Braat, D.D.M., Van Der Vlag, J. & De Boer, P. (2005). Asymmetry in Histone H3 variants and lysine methylation between paternal and maternal chromatin of the early mouse zygote. Mech. Dev. 122, 1008–22.Google Scholar
Wang, F., Kou, Z., Zhang, Y. & Gao, S. (2007). Dynamic reprogramming of histone acetylation and methylation in the first cell cycle of cloned mouse embryos. Biol. Reprod. 77, 1007–16.Google Scholar
Williams, K., Christensen, J., Rappsilber, J., Nielsen, A.L., Johansen, J.V. & Helin, K. (2014). The histone lysine demethylase JMJD3/KDM6B is recruited to p53 bound promoters and enhancer elements in a p53 dependent manner. PLoS One 9, e96545.Google Scholar
Xie, B., Zhang, H., Wei, R., Li, Q., Weng, X., Kong, Q. & Liu, Z. (2016). Histone H3 lysine 27 trimethylation acts as an epigenetic barrier in porcine nuclear reprogramming. Reproduction 151, 916.Google Scholar
Young, S.J., Yeo, S., Jung, S.P., Lee, K.K. & Kang, Y.K. (2007). Gradual development of a genome-wide H3-K9 trimethylation pattern in paternally derived pig pronucleus. Dev. Dyn. 236, 1509–16.Google Scholar
Zhou, N., Cao, Z., Wu, R., Liu, X., Tao, J., Chen, Z., Song, D., Han, F., Li, Y., Fang, F., et al. (2014). Dynamic changes of histone H3 lysine 27 acetylation in pre-implantational pig embryos derived from somatic cell nuclear transfer. Anim. Reprod. Sci. 148, 153–63.Google Scholar
Figure 0

Figure 1 Distribution of acetylated, mono-, di- and tri-methylated H3K27 in porcine oocytes and embryos. Panels show representative images of immature (GV stage) and mature (MII stage) oocytes, zygotes (PN stage), 2-cell (2C), 4-cell (4C) and 8-cell (8C) stage embryos, and day 6 (D6) and day 8 (D8) blastocysts.

Figure 1

Figure 2 Fluorescence intensity for H3K27ac (A), H3K27me1 (B), H3K27me2 (C) and H3K27me3 (D) in porcine oocytes and developing embryos. GV = germinal vesicle oocytes, MII = metaphase II oocytes, PN = pronuclear stage zygotes, 2C = two-cell stage embryos, 4C = four-cell stage embryos, 8C = eight-cell stage embryos, D6 = day 6 blastocysts, D8 = day 8 blastocysts.

Figure 2

Figure 3 H3K27me3 immunofluorescence image of a polyspermic zygote showing one stained and two non-stained PNs. (1) DNA stained with DAPI. (2) H3K27me3 fluorescent signal.

Figure 3

Figure 4 H3K27me3 immunofluorescence image day 8 blastocysts. (1) Embryo with absence or weak H3K27me3 fluorescent signal. (2) Embryo with strong H3K27me3 fluorescent signal in all the cells. (3) Embryo with strong H3K27me3 fluorescent signal only in the ICM cells.