Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-kw2vx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-11T19:34:05.923Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

A comparative study of stability margins for walking machines

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 November 2002

Elena Garcia
Affiliation:
Instituto de Automatica Industrial, La Poveda, 28500 Madrid (Spain). egarcia@iai.csic.es
Joaquin Estremera
Affiliation:
Instituto de Automatica Industrial, La Poveda, 28500 Madrid (Spain). egarcia@iai.csic.es
Pablo Gonzalez de Santos
Affiliation:
Instituto de Automatica Industrial, La Poveda, 28500 Madrid (Spain). egarcia@iai.csic.es
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Several static and dynamic stability criteria have been defined in the course of walking robot history. Nevertheless, different applications may require different stability criteria and, to the authors' best knowledge, there is no qualitative classification of such stability measurements. Using the wrong stability criterion to control a robot gait may prevent the task from succeeding. Furthermore, if the optimum criterion is found, the robot gait can also be optimized. In this paper, the stability criteria that have been applied to walking robots with at least four legs are examined in terms of their stability margins in different static and dynamic situations. As a result, a qualitative classification of stability criteria for walking machines is proposed so that the proper criterion can be chosen for every desired application.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© 2002 Cambridge University Press