Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-f46jp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-06T07:43:42.419Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Smallest weakly contractible non-contractible topological spaces

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 December 2019

Nicolás Cianci
Affiliation:
Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales, Universidad Nacional de Cuyo, Mendoza, Argentina (mottina@fcen.uncu.edu.ar)
Miguel Ottina
Affiliation:
Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales, Universidad Nacional de Cuyo, Mendoza, Argentina (mottina@fcen.uncu.edu.ar)
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

We characterize the topological spaces of minimum cardinality which are weakly contractible but not contractible. This is equivalent to finding the non-dismantlable posets of minimum cardinality such that the geometric realization of their order complexes are contractible. Specifically, we prove that all weakly contractible topological spaces with fewer than nine points are contractible. We also prove that there exist (up to homeomorphism) exactly two topological spaces of nine points which are weakly contractible but not contractible.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Edinburgh Mathematical Society 2019

References

1.Alexandroff, P., Diskrete Räume, Math. Sbornik (N.S.) 2(3) (1937), 501518.Google Scholar
2.Barmak, J., Algebraic topology of finite topological spaces and applications, Lecture Notes in Mathematics, Volume 2032 (Springer, Heidelberg, 2011).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3.Barmak, J. and Minian, G., Minimal finite models, J. Homotopy Relat. Struct. 2(1) (2007), 127140.Google Scholar
4.Barmak, J. and Minian, G., One-point reductions of finite spaces, h-regular CW-complexes and collapsibility, Algebr. Geom. Topol. 8(3) (2008), 17631780.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5.Barmak, J. and Minian, G., Simple homotopy types and finite spaces, Adv. Math. 218(1) (2008), 87104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6.Barmak, J. and Minian, G., Strong homotopy types, nerves and collapses, Discrete Comput. Geom. 47(2) (2012), 301328.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7.Cianci, N. and Ottina, M., A new spectral sequence for homology of posets, Topol. Appl. 217 (2017), 119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8.Cianci, N. and Ottina, M., Poset splitting and minimality of finite models, J. Comb. Theory Ser. A 157 (2018), 120161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9.Hardie, K. A., Vermeulen, J. J. C. and Witbooi, P. J., A nontrivial pairing of finite T 0 spaces, Topol. Appl. 125(3) (2002), 533542.10.1016/S0166-8641(01)00298-XCrossRefGoogle Scholar
10.May, J. P., Finite spaces and simplicial complexes. Notes for REU (2003). Available at http://www.math.uchicago.edu/~may/MISCMaster.html Google Scholar.Google Scholar
11.May, J. P., Finite spaces and larger contexts. Unpublished book (2016).Google Scholar
12.McCord, M. C., Singular homology groups and homotopy groups of finite topological spaces, Duke Math. J. 33(3) (1966), 465474.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
13.Rival, I., A fixed point theorem for finite partially ordered sets, J. Comb. Theory Ser. A 21(3) (1976), 309318.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
14.Stong, R. E., Finite topological spaces, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 123(2) (1966), 325340.10.1090/S0002-9947-1966-0195042-2CrossRefGoogle Scholar