Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-kw2vx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-06T03:35:28.387Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

USING EXCURSIONS TO ANALYZE SIMULATION OUTPUT

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 March 2010

James M. Calvin
Affiliation:
Department of Computer Science, New Jersey Institute of Technology, Newark, NJ 07102 E-mail: calvin@njit.edu
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

We consider the steady-state simulation output analysis problem for a process that satisfies a functional central limit theorem. We construct an estimator for the time-average variance constant that is based on excursions of a process above the minimum. The resulting estimator does not require a fixed run length, and the memory requirement can be dynamically bounded. Standardized time series methods based on excursions are also described.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2010

References

1.Billingsley, P. (1968). Convergence of probability measures. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
2.Calvin, J. (1995). Average performance of passive algorithms for global optimization. Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications 191: 608617.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3.Calvin, J.M. (2004) Simulation output analysis based on excursions. In Ingalls, R.G., Rosetti, M.D., Smith, J.S. & Peters, B.A., (eds.) Proceedings of the 2004 winter simulation conference. (Piscataway, NJ), Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, pp. 681684.Google Scholar
4.Chien, C., Goldsman, D. & Melamed, B. (1997). Large-sample results for batch means. Management Science 43: 12881295.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5.Chung, K.L. (1976). Excursions in Brownian motion. Arkiv för Matematik 14: 155177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6.Futschik, A. & Pflug, G. (1997). Optimal allocation of simulation experiments in discrete stochastic optimization and approximative algorithms. European Journal of Operational Research 101: 245260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7.Glynn, P.W. & Iglehart, D.L. (1990). Simulation output analysis using standardized time series. Mathematics of Operations Research 14: 116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8.Goldsman, D. & Schmeiser, B.W. (1997). Computational efficiency of batching methods. In Andradóttir, S., Healy, K.J., Withers, D.H. & Nelson, B.L., (eds.) Proceedings of the 1997 winter simulation conference. Piscataway, NJ: Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, pp. 202207.Google Scholar
9.Karatzas, I. & Shreve, S.E. (2000). Brownian motion and stochastic calculus, 2nd ed.New York: Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar
10.Kim, S.-H. & Nelson, B.L. (2006). On the asymptotic validity of fully sequential selection procedures for steady-state simulation. Operations Research 54: 475488.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11.Meketon, M.S. & Schmeiser, B.W. (1984). Overlapping batch means: Something for nothing? In Sheppard, S., Pooch, U. & Pegden, D. (eds.) Proceedings of the 1984 winter simulation conference. Piscataway, NJ: Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, pp. 227230.Google Scholar
12.Revuz, D. & Yor, M. (1994). Continuous martingales and brownian motion. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar
13.Rogers, L.C.G. & Williams, D. (1994). Diffusions, Markov processes and martingales: Vol. 1: Foundations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
14.Schruben, L.W. (1983). Confidence interval estimation using standardized time series. Operations Research, Volume 31, pp. 10901108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
15.Vervaat, W. (1979). A relation between Brownian bridge and Brownian excursion. Annals of Probability, Volume 7, pp. 141149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
16.Yeh, Y. & Schmeiser, B.W. (2000). Simulation output analysis via dynamic batch means. In Joines, J.A., Barton, R.R., Kang, K. & Fishwick, P.A., (eds.) Proceedings of the 2000 winter simulation conference. Piscataway, NJ: Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, pp. 637645.Google Scholar