Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-v2bm5 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-11T02:10:39.393Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

GENERALIZED EXTREME SHOCK MODELS WITH A POSSIBLY INCREASING THRESHOLD

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 May 2011

Pasquale Cirillo  and
Jürg Hüsler
Pasquale Cirillo
Affiliation:
Institute of Mathematical Statistics and Actuarial Sciences, University of Bern, CH-3012, Bern, Switzerland Email: pasquale.cirillo@stat.unibe.ch
Jürg Hüsler
Affiliation:
Institute of Mathematical Statistics and Actuarial Sciences, University of Bern, CH-3012, Bern, Switzerland Email: pasquale.cirillo@stat.unibe.ch
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

We propose a generalized extreme shock model with a possibly increasing failure threshold. Although standard models assume that the crucial threshold for the system might only decrease over time, because of weakening shocks and obsolescence, we assume that, especially at the beginning of the system's life, some strengthening shocks might increase the system tolerance to large shock. This is, for example, the case of turbines’ running-in in the field of engineering. On the basis of parametric assumptions, we provide theoretical results and derive some exact and asymptotic univariate and multivariate distributions for the model. In the last part of the article we show how to link this new model to some nonparametric approaches proposed in the literature.

Type
Research Article
Information
Probability in the Engineering and Informational Sciences , Volume 25 , Issue 3 , July 2011 , pp. 419 - 434
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2011

References

REFERENCES

1.Cirillo, P. & Hüsler, J. (2009). An urn approach to generalized extreme shock models. Statistics and Probability Letters 79: 969–976.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2.Cirillo, P. & Hüsler, J. (2010). Extreme shock models: an alternative perspective. Statistics and Probability Letters 81: 25–30.Google Scholar
3.Dunn, C.W., Pugh, P.R. & Haddock, S.H.D. (2005). Molecular phylogenetics of the Siphonophora (Cnidaria), with implications for the evolution of functional specialization. Systematic Biology 54: 916–935.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
4.Flajolet, P., Dumas, P. & Puyhaubert, V. (2006). Some exactly solvable models of urn process theory. In Fourth Colloquium on Mathematics and Computer Science, pp. 59–118.Google Scholar
5.Flajolet, P., Gabarro, J. & Pekari, H. (2005). Analytic urns. Annals of Probability 33: 1200–1233.Google Scholar
6.Gut, A. (1990). Cumulative shock models. Advances in Applied Probability 22: 504–507.Google Scholar
7.Gut, A. (2001). Mixed shock models. Bernoulli 7: 541–555.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8.Gut, A. & Hüsler, J. (1999). Extreme shock models. Extremes 2: 293–305.Google Scholar
9.Gut, A. & Hüsler, J. (2005). Realistic variation of shock models. Statistics and Probability Letters 74: 187–204.Google Scholar
10.Muliere, P., Secchi, P. & Walker, S. (2000). Urn schemes and reinforced random walks. Stochastic Processes and their Applications 88: 59–78.Google Scholar