Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-cphqk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-11T19:29:32.705Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Molecular characterization of the Glu-Ay gene from Triticum urartu for its potential use in quality wheat breeding

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 March 2011

M. V. Gutiérrez
Affiliation:
Departamento de Genética, Escuela Técnica Superior de Ingeniería Agronómica y de Montes, Edificio Gregor Mendel, Campus de Rabanales, Universidad de Córdoba, ES-14071 Córdoba, Spain
C. Guzmán
Affiliation:
Departamento de Genética, Escuela Técnica Superior de Ingeniería Agronómica y de Montes, Edificio Gregor Mendel, Campus de Rabanales, Universidad de Córdoba, ES-14071 Córdoba, Spain
L. M. Martín
Affiliation:
Departamento de Genética, Escuela Técnica Superior de Ingeniería Agronómica y de Montes, Edificio Gregor Mendel, Campus de Rabanales, Universidad de Córdoba, ES-14071 Córdoba, Spain
J. B. Alvarez*
Affiliation:
Departamento de Genética, Escuela Técnica Superior de Ingeniería Agronómica y de Montes, Edificio Gregor Mendel, Campus de Rabanales, Universidad de Córdoba, ES-14071 Córdoba, Spain
*
*Corresponding author. E-mail: jb.alvarez@uco.es
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Triticum urartu Thum. ex Gandil. is a wild species identified as A-genome donor for polyploid wheats, which could be used as gene source for wheat breeding. The high-molecular weight glutenin subunits are endosperm storage proteins that are associated with bread-making quality. In T. urartu, these proteins are encoded by the Ax and Ay genes at the Glu-Au1 locus. The Ay gene of 17 Glu-Au1 allelic variants previously detected in this species has been analysed using PCR amplification and digestion of the PCR products with two endonucleases (DdeI and PstI). The combination of two restriction patterns has revealed variations between the active and inactive alleles, and within each type. This variation, especially that detected among the active alleles, could enlarge the high-quality genetic pool of modern wheat and be used for bread-making quality improvement in durum and common wheat.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © NIAB 2011

Introduction

Nowadays, global climate change is one of the major problems facing humanity. For crops, this will require the release of new cultivars able to adapt to a changing environment, without reducing quality standards or affecting industrial food production according to the demands of a population highly sensitized to food quality (Godfray et al., Reference Godfray, Beddington, Crute, Haddad, Lawrence, Muir, Pretty, Robinson, Thomas and Toulmin2010). Several different studies have suggested that relatives and wild progenitors of wheat species could be interesting candidates for enlarging the gene pool of cultivated wheats (Hajjar and Hodgkin, Reference Hajjar and Hodgkin2007). At the diploid level, the main species of wild diploid wheat are Triticum monococcum L. ssp. aegilopoides Link em. Thell. (syn. T. boeoticum; 2n = 2x = 14; AmAm) and T. urartu Thum. ex Gandil (2n = 2x = 14; AuAu), the latter species having been identified as the A-genome donor of polyploid wheat (Dvorak et al., Reference Dvorak, Terlizzi, Zhang and Resta1993).

The presence and variability of the endosperm storage proteins are associated with the bread-making quality of wheat. These proteins are divided into two main groups (gliadins and glutenins) according to their molecular characteristics (Payne, Reference Payne1987). Glutenins are also divided into high molecular weight (HMWGs) and low molecular weight (B-LMWGs and C-LMWGs) subunits. The HMWGs, encoded by genes at the Glu-1 loci located on the long arm of group-1 homoeologous chromosomes being the best studied (Payne, Reference Payne1987), have been associated with bread-making quality in common wheat (Cornish et al., Reference Cornish, Békés, Eagles, Payne, Wrigley, Békés and Bushuk2006). Each Glu-1 locus contains two tightly linked genes that encode for two types of HMWGs, called x- and y-type (Harberd et al., Reference Harberd, Bartels and Thompson1986), although some of these genes are not expressed in cultivated wheats. In particular, the Ay subunit is absent in all durum and common wheats, while it is expressed in wild diploid and tetraploid wheats (Waines and Payne, Reference Waines and Payne1987; Ciaffi et al., Reference Ciaffi, Lafiandra, Porceddu and Benedettelli1993), its presence being associated with an increase in bread-making quality in wheat (Ciaffi et al., Reference Ciaffi, Lafiandra, Turchetta, Ravaglia, Bariana, Gupta and MacRitchie1995).

Alvarez et al. (Reference Alvarez, Caballero, Nadal, Ramírez and Martín2009) showed that the introgression of T. urartu genome in durum wheat affects the gluten strength. However, these materials were developed from a single line, whereas Caballero et al. (Reference Caballero, Martín and Alvarez2008) found as many as 17 allelic variants for the Glu-A u1 locus in a large collection of T. urartu. The Ax gene was found to be active in all these alleles, while the Ay subunit was detected in nine of them.

The aim of the present study was the molecular characterization of the allelic variants for the Ay gene detected by Caballero et al. (Reference Caballero, Martín and Alvarez2008) to obtain additional data prior to their potential introgression in wheat.

Materials and methods

Seventeen accessions of T. urartu that have the allelic variants found by Caballero et al. (Reference Caballero, Martín and Alvarez2008) were analysed. DNA isolation was carried out from young leaf tissue using the cetyl trimethyl ammonium bromide method (Stacey and Isaac, Reference Stacey, Isaac and Isaac1994).

The primers reported by D'Ovidio et al. (Reference D'Ovidio, Masci and Porceddu1995) were used to amplify the complete coding sequence of the Ay gene. PCR reactions mixtures were carried out in a final volume of 20 μl composed of 1 ×  Taq PCR buffer (Promega), 125 ng of template DNA, 0.6 μM of each forward and reverse primer, 1.5 mM MgCl2, 0.2 mM of each deoxyribonucleotide and 1 U of Taq DNA polymerase (Promega). DNA was subjected to an initial denaturation step at 95°C for 5 min, and the amplification conditions were 35 cycles at 95°C for 1 min, 60°C for 1 min and 72°C for 2 min, followed by a final incubation step at 72°C for 8 min.

The amplicons (PCR products) were separated in polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (PAGE) gel with a discontinuous Tris–HCl buffer system (pH: 6.8/8.8) at a polyacrylamide concentration of 8% (w/v, crosslinker (C): 1.68%). These amplicons were digested using DdeI and PstI endonucleases and separated in PAGE gel with a discontinuous Tris–HCl buffer system (pH: 6.8/8.8) at a polyacrylamide concentration of 10% (w/v, C: 1.68%).

Results and discussion

The amplification of the complete coding sequence in the accessions with and without active Ay subunits revealed a single band of around 1500 bp, although with some small differences in size among them, in the accessions with Ay active subunits as well as in others with inactive ones (Fig. 1). This is in agreement with the findings of Caballero et al. (Reference Caballero, Martín and Alvarez2008), who detected four Ay active subunits with differences in their mobility.

Fig. 1 PAGE separation of PCR products from the Ay genes. (a) active Ay alleles; (b) inactive Ay alleles. M, X174 DNA-Hae III digest; C, cv. Cheyenne; A, cv. Alaga.

Some studies have suggested that digestion with endonucleases could be a useful tool to evaluate the internal differences between these alleles (Lafiandra et al., Reference Lafiandra, Tucci, Pavoni, Turchetta and Margiotta1997; Alvarez et al., Reference Alvarez, D'Ovidio and Lafiandra1998). The amplicon digestion with DdeI (Fig. 2(a) and (b)) showed three restriction patterns between the active Ay alleles, while in the inactive ones, five restriction patterns were identified. In the case of the digestion with PstI (Fig. 2(c) and 2(d)) four patterns were revealed for the active Ay alleles and six for the inactive ones. Although, in general, the restriction patterns of the active alleles were different from those of the inactive alleles, one of the patterns of the active alleles (lanes 2 and 5), together with the pattern of lane 10 (of an inactive allele), showed the same restriction pattern with both digestions (Fig. 2, lanes 2, 5 and 10).

Fig. 2 PAGE separation of PCR products from the Ay genes digested with Dde I and PstI (up and down, respectively). (a and c) digestion patterns of active Ay alleles; (b and d) digestion patterns of inactive Ay alleles. M, X174 DNA-Hae III digest; C, cv. Cheyenne; A, cv. Alaga.

On the other hand, all the restriction patterns found in these T. urartu lines differed from those of the inactive Ay allele present in cv. Cheyenne, while some of them showed similarities with the Ay alleles detected in cv. Alaga (Fig. 2).

In some cases, only the combined use of the restriction patterns from both endonucleases evidenced differences between alleles. The actives alleles shown in lanes 1, 3, 4, 6, 7 and 9 were similar in total size (Fig. 1) and DdeI digestion (Fig. 2); however, the PstI digestion separated these alleles into two groups. The first group (lanes 1, 3, 4 and 7) presented five bands or fragments, whereas the second group (lanes 6 and 9) showed six. The difference was that fragment 2 of group 1 was digested into two fragments for group 2: one fragment comigrated with the band 3 and the other produced a new band of approximately 120 bp that also appeared in the rest of the restriction patterns. The same occurred for DdeI digestion in the inactive alleles, where the alleles showed in lanes 11 and 13 presented similar restriction pattern, but the PstI digestion indicated that the two alleles are different.

Although further research needs to be carried out in the future, such as the sequencing of these Ay alleles, the results of this study demonstrate that the Ay alleles presented in T. urartu, both active and inactive ones, are different from the alleles found in cultivated wheat. For breeding purposes, the variation detected for the active alleles would permit to expand the high-quality gene pool of the cultivated wheats. Consequently, the evaluation and characterization of the genetic resources of this wild species are very important for its conservation and potential use in wheat breeding programmes.

Acknowledgements

This research was supported by grant AGL2007-65685-C02-02 from the Spanish Ministry of Science and Innovation and the European Regional Development Fund (FEDER) from the European Union. C. G. thanks the Spanish Ministry of Education and Science (FPU programme) for a predoctoral fellowship.

References

Alvarez, JB, D'Ovidio, R and Lafiandra, D (1998) Analysis of x- and y-type genes presente at the Glu-A1 encoding high molecular weight glutenin subunits in wild and cultivated wheats. Proceedings of 9th Wheat Genetics Symposium, vol. 4. Saskatoon: University Extension Press, University of Saskatchewan, pp. 127129.Google Scholar
Alvarez, JB, Caballero, L, Nadal, S, Ramírez, MC and Martín, A (2009) Development and gluten strength evaluation of introgression lines of Triticum urartu in durum wheat. Cereal Research Communications 37: 243248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Caballero, L, Martín, MA and Alvarez, JB (2008) Allelic variation for the high-and-low-molecular-weight glutenin subunits in wild diploid wheat (Triticum urartu) and its comparison with durum wheats. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 59: 906910.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ciaffi, M, Lafiandra, D, Porceddu, E and Benedettelli, S (1993) Storage-protein variation in wild emmer wheat (Triticum turgidum ssp. dicoccoides) form Jordan and Turkey. I. Electrophoretic characterization of genotypes. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 86: 474480.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ciaffi, M, Lafiandra, D, Turchetta, T, Ravaglia, S, Bariana, H, Gupta, RB and MacRitchie, F (1995) Bread-baking potential of durum wheat lines expressing both x-and y-type subunits at the Glu-A1 locus. Cereal Chemistry 72: 465469.Google Scholar
Cornish, GB, Békés, F, Eagles, HA and Payne, PI (2006) Prediction of dough properties for bread wheats. In: Wrigley, C, Békés, F and Bushuk, W (eds) Gliadin and Glutenin: The Unique Balance of Wheat Quality. St. Paul, MN: AACC International Press, pp. 243280.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
D'Ovidio, R, Masci, S and Porceddu, E (1995) Development of a set of oligonucleotide primers specific for genes at the Glu-1 complex loci of wheat. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 91: 189194.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dvorak, J, Terlizzi, P, Zhang, HB and Resta, P (1993) The evolution of polyploidy wheats: identification of the A genome species. Genome 36: 2131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Godfray, HCJ, Beddington, JR, Crute, IR, Haddad, L, Lawrence, D, Muir, JF, Pretty, J, Robinson, S, Thomas, SM and Toulmin, C (2010) Food security: the challenge of feeding 9 billion people. Science 327: 812818.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hajjar, R and Hodgkin, T (2007) The use of wild relative in crop improvement: a survey of developments over the last 20 years. Euphytica 156: 113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harberd, NP, Bartels, D and Thompson, RD (1986) DNA restriction fragment variation in the gene family encoding high-molecular-weight (HMW) glutenin subunits of wheat. Biochemical Genetics 24: 579596.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lafiandra, D, Tucci, GF, Pavoni, A, Turchetta, T and Margiotta, B (1997) PCR analysis of x- and y-type genes present at the complex Glu-A1 locus in durum and bread wheat. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 94: 235240.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Payne, PI (1987) Genetics of wheat storage proteins and the effects of allelic variation on bread-making quality. Annual Review of Plant Physiology 38: 141153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stacey, J and Isaac, P (1994) Isolation of DNA from plants. In: Isaac, PG (ed.) Methods in Molecular Biology: Protocols for Nucleic Acid Analysis by Non-Radiactive Probes. Totawa: Humana Press, pp. 915.Google Scholar
Waines, JG and Payne, PI (1987) Electrophoretic analysis of the high-molecular-weight glutenin subunits of Triticum monococcum, T. urartu, and the A genome of bread wheat (T. aestivum). Theoretical and Applied Genetics 74: 7176.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Figure 0

Fig. 1 PAGE separation of PCR products from the Ay genes. (a) active Ay alleles; (b) inactive Ay alleles. M, X174 DNA-Hae III digest; C, cv. Cheyenne; A, cv. Alaga.

Figure 1

Fig. 2 PAGE separation of PCR products from the Ay genes digested with Dde I and PstI (up and down, respectively). (a and c) digestion patterns of active Ay alleles; (b and d) digestion patterns of inactive Ay alleles. M, X174 DNA-Hae III digest; C, cv. Cheyenne; A, cv. Alaga.