Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-s22k5 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-06T18:46:51.283Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The antimalarial action of FK506 and rapamycin: evidence for a direct effect on FK506-binding protein PfFKBP35

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 March 2017

PAUL MONAGHAN
Affiliation:
Department of Microbiology, School of Genetics & Microbiology, Moyne Institute, Trinity College Dublin, Ireland
DARREN B. LENEGHAN
Affiliation:
Department of Microbiology, School of Genetics & Microbiology, Moyne Institute, Trinity College Dublin, Ireland
WESLEY SHAW
Affiliation:
Department of Microbiology, School of Genetics & Microbiology, Moyne Institute, Trinity College Dublin, Ireland
ANGUS BELL*
Affiliation:
Department of Microbiology, School of Genetics & Microbiology, Moyne Institute, Trinity College Dublin, Ireland
*
*Corresponding author: Institute of Cancer Research, 123 Old Brompton Rd., London SW7 3RP, UK. E-mail: angus.bell@icr.ac.uk

Summary

FK506 and rapamycin (Rap) are immunosuppressive drugs that act principally on T-lymphocytes. The receptors for both drugs are FK506-binding proteins (FKBPs), but the molecular mechanisms of immunosuppression differ. An FK506–FKBP complex inhibits the protein phosphatase calcineurin, blocking a key step in T-cell activation, while the Rap –FKBP complex binds to the protein kinase target of rapamycin (TOR), which is involved in a subsequent signalling pathway. Both drugs, and certain non-immunosuppressive compounds related to FK506, have potent antimalarial activity. There is however conflicting evidence on the involvement of Plasmodium calcineurin in the action of FK506, and the parasite lacks an apparent TOR homologue. We therefore set out to establish whether inhibition of the Plasmodium falciparum FKBP PfFKBP35 itself might be responsible for the antimalarial effects of FK506 and Rap. Similarities in the antiparasitic actions of FK506 and Rap would constitute indirect evidence for this hypothesis. FK506 and Rap acted indistinguishably on: (i) specificity for different intra-erythrocytic stages in culture, (ii) kinetics of killing or irreversible growth arrest of parasites and (iii) interactions with other antimalarial agents. Furthermore, PfFKBP35's inhibitory effect on calcineurin was independent of FK506 under a range of conditions, suggesting that calcineurin is unlikely to be involved in the antimalarial action of FK506.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2017 

INTRODUCTION

Of more than 5000 proteins encoded by the genome of the most lethal human malarial parasite Plasmodium falciparum, perhaps several hundred have been suggested to be potential chemotherapeutic targets; yet the number of fully validated targets remains much smaller (Flannery et al. Reference Flannery, Chatterjee and Winzeler2013). Even when known inhibitors of a given protein have demonstrated antimalarial activity, this observation is insufficient basis for concluding that it is the effect on that protein that leads to the death of the parasite or the arrest of its growth or development. Full validation is usually achieved only when it has been shown that genetic ablation of the proposed target achieves the same effect as the inhibitor (e.g. knock-out is lethal) and that mutations giving rise to changes in amino acid sequence of the proposed target are (in an otherwise identical genetic background) sufficient to confer resistance to the inhibitor. The limited number of well-validated targets is to some extent a consequence of the time consuming and difficult nature of carrying out the necessary genetic manipulations in Plasmodium parasites. In the case of the P. falciparum FK506-binding protein PfFKBP35 (Monaghan & Bell, Reference Monaghan and Bell2005), we lack transgenic parasite data, but in this paper take a different approach to the question of whether inhibitors of this protein should make good antimalarial drugs.

FK506-binding proteins (FKBPs) were discovered in 1989 as the major receptors of the immunosuppressive macrolactones FK506 (tacrolimus) and rapamycin (Rap, sirolimus) (Siekierka et al. Reference Siekierka, Staruch, Hung and Sigal1989; Bierer et al. Reference Bierer, Mattila, Standaert, Herzenberg, Burakoff, Crabtree and Schreiber1990). They have since been found widely in biology and attributed numerous functional roles related to protein folding, regulation and signal transduction (Galat, Reference Galat2003). FK506 and Rap block the characteristic peptidyl-prolyl cis–trans isomerase (PPIase) activity displayed by most FKBPs, but their immunosuppressive effects are not a direct result of this inhibition; rather, the drug–FKBP complexes target separate proteins involved in signalling, namely the phosphoprotein phosphatase calcineurin (PPP3) in the case of FK506 and the protein kinase mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) in the case of Rap (Bierer et al. Reference Bierer, Mattila, Standaert, Herzenberg, Burakoff, Crabtree and Schreiber1990; Galat, Reference Galat2003). Uncannily, the lipophilic, cyclic undecapeptide cyclosporin A (CsA) affects the same target as FK506, also in the form of a complex with its receptor, cyclophilin, which in spite of being unrelated in structure to the FKBPs is also a PPIase (Galat, Reference Galat2003). FK506 and CsA are therefore commonly referred to as calcineurin inhibitors, but in some cases their pharmacological activities are unrelated to calcineurin (Galat & Bua, Reference Galat and Bua2010; Harikishore & Yoon, Reference Harikishore and Yoon2015). In fact, non-immunosuppressive congeners of FK506 and CsA have been under investigation as potential therapies for diseases as diverse as cancer, neurodegeneration, hepatitis C infection and malaria (Bell et al. Reference Bell, Monaghan and Page2006; Cao & Konsolaki, Reference Cao and Konsolaki2011; Gaali et al. Reference Gaali, Gopalakrishnan, Wang, Kozany and Hausch2011; Frausto et al. Reference Frausto, Lee and Tang2013; Harikishore & Yoon, Reference Harikishore and Yoon2015).

FK506, Rap and CsA, all of which were originally discovered as antimicrobial agents, have high nano- to low micromolar potency against cultured blood-stage P. falciparum parasites (Bell et al. Reference Bell, Wernli and Franklin1994). The parasite possesses an FKBP (PfFKBP35) (Braun et al. Reference Braun, Barglow, Lin, Akompong, Briesewitz, Ray, Haldar and Wandless2003; Kumar et al. Reference Kumar, Adams, Musiyenko, Shulyayeva and Barik2005; Monaghan & Bell, Reference Monaghan and Bell2005), a number of cyclophilins and cyclophilin-like proteins (Hirtzlin et al. Reference Hirtzlin, Färber, Franklin and Bell1995; Reddy, Reference Reddy1995; Berriman & Fairlamb, Reference Berriman and Fairlamb1998; Gavigan et al. Reference Gavigan, Kiely, Hirtzlin and Bell2003; Marín-Menéndez & Bell, Reference Marín-Menéndez and Bell2011), and a calcineurin (Dobson et al. Reference Dobson, May, Berriman, Del Vecchio, Fairlamb, Chakrabarti and Barik1999; Kumar et al. Reference Kumar, Musiyenko, Oldenburg, Adams and Barik2004). Some researchers have assumed that these drugs exert their antimalarial actions via calcineurin (Kotaka et al. Reference Kotaka, Ye, Alag, Hu, Bozdech, Preiser, Yoon and Lescar2008; Singh et al. Reference Singh, More and Chitnis2014). This appears to be the case for certain other antimicrobial activities such as that on Cryptococcus neoformans (Juvvadi et al. Reference Juvvadi, Lee, Heitman and Steinbach2016). There are however several problems with this idea, including (i) the potent antimalarial activities of non-immunosuppressive and non-calcineurin-binding congeners of FK506 and CsA (Bell et al. Reference Bell, Wernli and Franklin1994; Monaghan et al. Reference Monaghan, Fardis, Revill and Bell2005) and (ii) the unusual, FK506-independent calcineurin-binding property of PfFKBP35 (Kumar et al. Reference Kumar, Adams, Musiyenko, Shulyayeva and Barik2005; Monaghan & Bell, Reference Monaghan and Bell2005) (not found by Yoon et al. (Reference Yoon, Kang, Chia, Tang and Yoon2007)). Moreover, Plasmodium lacks an obvious mTOR homologue (although it does have related kinases), suggesting that macrolactones target this parasite by another route.

In view of these reservations, and of recent articles describing the design and evaluation of non-immunosuppressive, non-macrolactone PfFKBP35 inhibitors with potent activity on blood-stage parasites (Harikishore et al. Reference Harikishore, Leow, Niang, Rajan, Pasunooti, Preiser, Liu and Yoon2013a , Reference Harikishore, Niang, Rajan, Preiser and Yoon b ), we decided to explore a simpler hypothesis – namely that the relevant target of FK506, Rap, and other FKBP ligands is PfFKBP35 itself. We reasoned that if PfFKBP35 were the antimalarial target, the pharmacological actions of these two drugs on cultured parasites should be similar, relative to their potencies. If on the other hand calcineurin were the target of FK506 and a hitherto unknown protein (e.g. kinase) the target of Rap, then it should be possible to distinguish the effects of the two drugs. In assays of specificity for different developmental stages, kinetics of killing (or irreversible growth arrest), and interaction with other antimalarial agents, we found it impossible to differentiate between FK506 and Rap. Our data are therefore consistent with the notion of PfFKBP35 as the primary mediator of antimalarial action and underscore the need for genetic validation of this possible drug target.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Drugs, experimental compounds and reagents

Drugs and chemicals were obtained from Sigma Aldrich (Dublin) unless otherwise stated.

Calcineurin phosphatase assay

Binding of PfFKBP35 to calcineurin was measured via protein serine/threoine phosphatase assay of the latter, basically as described by Monaghan & Bell (Reference Monaghan and Bell2005) except that the concentrations of some of the reagents were varied as described under ‘Results’. Calcineurin (recombinant human) was supplied by Enzo Life Sciences (Exeter, U.K.) and the assay kit by Promega (MyBio Ltd., Kilkenny, Ireland). The recombinant FK506-binding domain of PfFKBP35, PfFKBD, was produced in Escherichia coli as described in Monaghan & Bell (Reference Monaghan and Bell2005) with the following modifications. After overexpression, E. coli lysis and binding steps performed as described previously, the nickel chelate affinity chromatography column (HisTrap® HP 5 mL, GE Life Sciences) was washed with metal chelate affinity chromatography (MCAC) buffer (25 mm sodium phosphate, 500 mm NaCl, pH 7·4) supplemented with 75 mm imidazole and recombinant protein was eluted with MCAC buffer supplemented with 200 mm imidazole.

Parasite culture and susceptibility testing

Plasmodium falciparum line 3D7 was cultured in human erythrocytes using standard methods as previously described (Fennell et al. Reference Fennell, Naughton, Dempsey and Bell2006). Drug susceptibility measurement using the parasite lactate dehydrogenase (pLDH) method was done as by Cunningham et al. (Reference Cunningham, Drag, Kafarski and Bell2008) and drug combinations tested using a chequerboard arrangement according to Gavigan et al. (Reference Gavigan, Shen, Machado and Bell2007). At least two to three replicate determinations were made. Combination data analysis was generated by the Horizon Chalice™ Analyzer software, available online at http://cwr.horizondiscovery.com. For assays of specificity for different stages, cultures were age-selected by two treatments with sorbitol (Lambros & Vanderberg, Reference Lambros and Vanderberg1979) 36 h apart then grown to the appropriate age range before measuring drug susceptibility. To assess whether the inhibitory effects of the drugs were reversible and to examine the kinetics of killing (or irreversible arrest of growth), mature trophozoite [24–30 h post-invasion (p.i.)] cultures of starting parasitaemia 0·8% were grown with 30 µ m FK506, 30 µ m Rap or drug-free solvent at an equivalent concentration. After different time periods the cultures were centrifuged, washed twice with pre-warmed wash medium (growth medium lacking serum substitute and antibiotic) and recultured. After 48 h of drug-free culture, Giemsa-stained thin blood smears were counted microscopically.

RESULTS

Calcineurin binding by PfFKBP35 in the absence of FK506

The classical molecular model of immunosuppressive action of FK506 involves the modulation of a protein–protein interaction. FKBP has low or no affinity for the phosphatase calcineurin unless the small-molecule modulator FK506 is present, in which case a complex forms in which the phosphatase activity is inhibited (Galat, Reference Galat2003). This effect is highly specific because it does not occur with Rap or with certain FK506 congeners with minor chemical modifications. The unusual finding of Monaghan & Bell (Reference Monaghan and Bell2005) that PfFKBP35 could interact with calcineurin irrespective of the presence or absence of FK506 therefore suggested that inhibition of calcineurin was unlikely to be the source of antimalarial activity of FK506. This finding was independently confirmed by Kumar et al. (Reference Kumar, Adams, Musiyenko, Shulyayeva and Barik2005) using the related compound ascomycin (FK520). Yoon et al. (Reference Yoon, Kang, Chia, Tang and Yoon2007) by contrast found calcineurin inhibition by PfFKBP35 to be somewhat FK506-dependent. Consideration of the different experimental conditions in the three papers suggested that the discrepancy could not be accounted for by the type of recombinant PfFKBP, the sources of the calcineurin and other reagents, or the type of phosphatase assay employed. There were however differences in the relative concentrations of the major reagents that might have accounted for the different results. We therefore repeated the experiment of Monaghan & Bell (Reference Monaghan and Bell2005), varying the ratios of PfFKBP35:calcineurin and FK506:PfFKBP35 to cover all those used in the three studies. Since it gave the same effect as PfFKBP35, the recombinant protein containing the PfFKBD alone was used (Monaghan & Bell, Reference Monaghan and Bell2005). The PfFKBP35:calcineurin ratio was varied from 20:1 to 1000:1 in the absence of FK506 or with FK506 added at an equimolar or 10-fold higher concentration relative to PfFKBD (Fig. 1). As expected, calcineurin was inhibited more at higher PfFKBP35:calcineurin ratios, though the degree of inhibition was less than recorded previously. The presence of FK506 had no effect, even at a 10-fold molar excess (relative to PfFKBD). We therefore concluded that the FK506-independent interaction of PfFKBP35 with calcineurin is maintained over a range of experimental conditions.

Fig. 1. Effects of different reagent ratios on calcineurin (CaN) binding by PfFKBD in the presence and absence of FK506. Activity of calcineurin was measured by the fluorescence of a rhodamine-conjugated peptide substrate that, upon dephosphorylation by calcineurin, is digested by a protease, releasing highly fluorescent rhodamine. The fluorescence attributable to 40 nm calcineurin was set as 100%. The effects of increasing molar ratio of PfFKBD to calcineurin (x-axis) and of PfFKBD to FK506 (circles, no FK506; triangles, 1:1 ratio; squares, 1 PfFKBD:10 FK506) on the activity of calcineurin were assessed. Bars show the SEM of values from three replicate experiments. To ensure that reduced fluorescence was not due to inhibition of the protease, a control peptide whose fluorescence is independent of phosphorylated state was incorporated into each reaction. No inhibition of protease occurred (data not shown).

Antimalarial action of FK506 and Rap on different blood stages

Different drugs active on asexual, blood-stage malarial parasites often differ in the part of the intraerythrocytic cycle that they most affect (Le Manach et al. Reference Le Manach, Scheurer, Sax, Schleiferböck, Cabrera, Younis, Paquet, Street, Smith, Ding, Waterson, Witty, Leroy, Chibale and Wittlin2013). For example, drugs that disrupt haemoglobin digestion tend to affect mainly the trophozoite stage, during which the rate of this process is maximal, while those affecting cell division tend to be most potent on schizonts. In an attempt to differentiate the actions of FK506 and Rap, parasites were age selected, grown to different stages, and tested for susceptibility by a standard, microplate-based antimalarial test after 12 h (Fig. 2). Of four 12-h stages, only stage 3, in which control parasites developed from trophozoite forms with an average age around 27 h p.i. to early schizonts (~39 h p.i.), was susceptible to FK506 with an IC50 of 30 µ m. All other stages were resistant up to 128 µ m. When the period was extended to 24, 36 or 48 h, the results also indicated that parasites passing through the trophozoite stage were most susceptible, though it was necessary to account for multiplication of surviving parasites during the assay and the fact that the amount of LDH per parasite increases through the cycle from ring to schizont. The results for Rap were broadly very similar to those for FK506 except that Rap appeared to be slightly more potent on average.

Fig. 2. Stage-dependent effects of FK506 and rapamycin on cultured blood-stage P. falciparum. Parasite cultures were age-selected by sorbitol treatment and grown to early rings (RE, 0–6 h p.i.), late rings/early trophozoites (RL/T, 12–18 h p.i.), mature trophozoites (T, 24–30 h p.i.) or schizonts (S, 36–42 h p.i.). Median inhibitory concentrations (IC50) were determined for cultures commencing at RE (stage 1), RL/T (stage 2), T (stage 3) and S (stage 4) over periods of 12, 24, 36 and 48 h using the pLDH method. IC50 values indicated in blue (FK506) and red (rapamycin) are averages of two determinations, each titrated in duplicate. The arrows indicate the progression of untreated parasites in the same experiment. *, IC50 values are higher than those from preceding time points, presumably because surviving parasites multiplied on entering a second intra-erythrocytic cycle (dotted red line).

Kinetics of killing (or irreversible growth arrest) by FK506 and Rap

Antimicrobial (including antimalarial) agents with different mechanisms of action also commonly differ in whether they are static or cidal and the time taken for their effects to become irreversible. FK506 and Rap (both at 30 µ m) were >90% cidal (or at least had effects that could not be reversed by washing the drug away and reculturing for 48 h) to trophozoites within 6–9 h (Fig. 3). The surviving parasites in the FK506 or Rap treated cultures contained higher proportions of rings, indicating that either there was some delay to development in survivors or that trophozites were killed more rapidly than rings. As with the stage-dependent susceptibility experiment, there was no clear difference between FK506 and Rap except that the latter was slightly more potent.

Fig. 3. Kinetics of killing or irreversible growth arrest of trophozoite-stage P. falciparum by FK506 and rapamycin. Cultures were age selected (24–30 h post-invasion) by sorbitol treatment and exposed for 0, 3, 6 or 9 h to 30 µ m FK506, rapamycin or to an equivalent concentration of solvent as a control. Parasitized erythrocytes were then washed free of drug and recultured for 48 h before counting on Giemsa-stained thin smears. Experiments were done in duplicate with >1000 erythrocytes counted on each slide; vertical bars show SEM.

Antimalarial interactions of FK506 and Rap with other compounds

Antimicrobial drugs are said to interact when the potency of two or more drugs combined in an assay of antimicrobial activity is either higher (synergism) or lower (antagonism) than would be expected from the individual activities simply added together (additivity) (Greco et al. Reference Greco, Bravo and Parsons1995; Bell, Reference Bell2005). The activity of a drug A is affected by drug B and/or vice versa usually as a result of some connectivity between the components and pathways of the cell that are targetted by the drugs (Zimmermann et al. Reference Zimmermann, Lehár and Keith2007). Drugs with similar mechanisms of action should therefore have similar profiles of (pharmacodynamic) interaction with other drugs, and drugs with different mechanisms should have distinct interaction profiles; this prediction has been confirmed, for example in E. coli (Yeh et al. Reference Yeh, Tschumi and Kishony2006). We therefore compared the interactions of FK506 and Rap with other antimalarial compounds using a chequerboard arrangement and a pLDH read-out as described before (Gavigan et al. Reference Gavigan, Shen, Machado and Bell2007). We have previously used this method to demonstrate synergistic and antagonistic interactions among various drugs, including CsA, quinolines and peptidase inhibitors (Gavigan et al. Reference Gavigan, Machado, Dalton and Bell2001, Reference Gavigan, Shen, Machado and Bell2007). The compounds chosen included CsA, the standard antimalarial drugs artemisinin and chloroquine, the Hsp90 inhibitor geldanamycin and the Hsp70 inhibitor pifithrin-μ. We choose the last two because both heat-shock proteins interact with PfFKBP35 (Kumar et al. Reference Kumar, Adams, Musiyenko, Shulyayeva and Barik2005; Leneghan & Bell, Reference Leneghan and Bell2015) and there was a possibility that this might lead to interactions of Hsp90 or Hsp70 inhibitors with FK506 and/or Rap. Pifithrin-μ had not previously been tested on Plasmodium but we found it to be antimalarial in culture with an IC50 of 15 µ m.

FK506 and Rap were first tested in combination (Fig. 4 panels A–D). Based on the negligible deviation (‘Loewe volume’ = −0·263: see Fig. 4 legend) of the observed parasite growth inhibition from that predicted for no interaction [Loewe additivity (Greco et al. Reference Greco, Bravo and Parsons1995)] (Fig. 4D) it was clear that there was no interaction between these two. By contrast, some of the combinations of FK506 and Rap with other compounds indicated substantial deviation from additivity: for example, FK506 and geldanamycin (Loewe volume = −4·53, Fig. 4H) appeared antagonistic. Looking at the pattern of interaction (Loewe volume values, Table 1), the data for FK506 and Rap were essentially indistinguishable: both showed apparent antagonism with chloroquine, geldanamycin, pifithrin-μ and (to a lesser extent) with CsA, and apparent (marginal) synergism with artemisinin. By contrast, CsA had some apparent interactions that were similar to those of FK506 and Rap and some that were different [e.g. (marginal) antagonism to artemisinin]. This analysis does not determine the statistical significance of the deviation from additivity, which is a separate (and highly specialized) analysis (Greco et al. Reference Greco, Bravo and Parsons1995) that we have not attempted here. As a point of comparison, the combination of CsA and chloroquine (Loewe volume = −4·02 in the present study) was previously shown to be antagonistic at a significance level of P < 0·001 using the same parasite line and experimental conditions (Gavigan et al. Reference Gavigan, Shen, Machado and Bell2007). Taken together, the data indicate that the interactions of FK506 and Rap with a limited number of antimalarial compounds were very similar.

Fig. 4. Examples of antimalarial drug interaction analysis using the Horizon Chalice™ Analyzer software. (A–D) combination of FK506 and Rap; E–H: combination of FK506 and geldanamycin. (A, E) Isobolograms showing 50% inhibitory concentrations (IC50) of the two compounds alone and in the presence of the other. Each compound was titrated in 8 2-fold steps alone and in combination. Susceptibility was measured on parasite line 3D7 after 72 h using the pLDH method and at least three independent determinations were done. Concentrations are shown on a relative scale where IC50 = 1. Points around the diagonal line are suggestive of additivity; points below left suggest synergism, and above right, antagonism. (B, F) ‘Observed’ inhibition of parasite growth (%) by each compound. For the purposes of the analysis, concentrations are shown on a relative scale (starting at around 4 × IC50). (C, G) ‘Expected’ inhibition of parasite growth by the various combinations based on inhibition determined using the compounds alone and assuming no interaction (i.e. Loewe additivity). (D, H) ‘Deviation’ of the observed inhibition values from those expected from the Loewe additivity model. Positive values (blue) indicate that inhibition was more than expected and negative values (purple) less than expected. The volume (Vol.) is a measure of the overall deviation of the data from those expected under Loewe additivity: a large positive value indicates synergism, a large negative value indicates antagonism, and values close to 0 indicate additivity.

Table 1. Interactions between FK506, Rap and CsA based on analysis using the Horizon Chalice™ Analyzer software (see Fig. 4)

a Positive values indicate a positive interaction (synergism) and negative values a negative interaction (antagonism). Larger ‘volumes’ indicate greater deviation from additivity, but the software does not test the statistical significance of the deviation.

DISCUSSION

PfFKBP35 and its Plasmodium vivax homologue PvFKBP35 have received attention as potential antimalarial drug targets, with reports of ligands with potent antimalarial activity (Monaghan et al. Reference Monaghan, Fardis, Revill and Bell2005; Harikishore et al. Reference Harikishore, Leow, Niang, Rajan, Pasunooti, Preiser, Liu and Yoon2013a , Reference Harikishore, Niang, Rajan, Preiser and Yoon b ) and atomic-level structures in complex with ligands (Kotaka et al. Reference Kotaka, Ye, Alag, Hu, Bozdech, Preiser, Yoon and Lescar2008; Alag et al. Reference Alag, Bharatham, Dong, Hills, Harikishore, Widjaja, Shochat, Hui and Yoon2009; Bianchin et al. Reference Bianchin, Allemand, Bell, Chubb and Guichou2015). Our understanding of the function of the protein in the parasite has however lagged behind. The gene is conserved among several Plasmodium strains and species whose genomes have been sequenced (www.plasmodb.org) but we do not yet know the consequences of genetic ablation. The function of PfFKBP35 can be guessed at based on data from FKBPs of other organisms (Bell et al. Reference Bell, Monaghan and Page2006) – we expect it to be involved in folding, transport and/or regulation of other proteins and perhaps in the response to stresses such as the temperature shocks encountered on transfer between hosts (Acharya et al. Reference Acharya, Kumar and Tatu2007). Its interacting partner proteins are now known to include heat-shock proteins and histones (Leneghan & Bell, Reference Leneghan and Bell2015) but the physiological/biochemical consequences of these molecular interactions have not yet been extensively investigated. In this paper, we have shown that the pharmacodynamic actions of two PfFKBP35 ligands, FK506 and Rap, were essentially indistinguishable. They had similar stage-dependent effects (Fig. 2), kinetics of killing or irreversible growth arrest (Fig. 3), and interaction with other antimalarial agents (Fig. 4, Table 1). Given that the downstream effects of FKBP–FK506 and FKBP–Rap complexes in other systems are utterly different, our data are consistent with the idea that it is the action of these ligands on PfFKBP35 itself that is likely to be relevant to antimalarial activity. To be confident of this conclusion however it will be necessary to provide further evidence, such as large-scale comparisons of the pharmacodynamic properties of FK506 and Rap with numerous other inhibitors or analysis of the phenotypes of transgenic PfFKBP35 knock-out and/or knock-down parasites.

An alternative hypothesis for the antimalarial activity of FK506 suggests that (by analogy with its immunosuppressive and certain other pharmacological actions) the drug works via inhibition (in a complex with PfFKBP35) of the parasite calcineurin (Bell et al. Reference Bell, Monaghan and Page2006). One observation that appears to support this notion is that the patterns of gene transcription in parasites exposed to FK506 and CsA (also, in complex with cyclophilin, a known calcineurin inhibitor) were virtually identical (Kotaka et al. Reference Kotaka, Ye, Alag, Hu, Bozdech, Preiser, Yoon and Lescar2008). Since the only known common target of the chemically dissimilar FK506 and CsA is calcineurin, this finding suggests a role for calcineurin in global gene regulation in parasites. It does not however show that the effect on this regulatory programme is responsible for the lethality of FK506 and/or CsA. Moreover, the experiment was performed in schizonts, which in our study were not the stage most susceptible to the action of FK506 (Fig. 2). Recently published studies by Paul et al. (Reference Paul, Saha, Engelberg, Jiang, Coleman, Kosber, Chen, Ganter, Espy, Gilberger, Gubbels and Duraisingh2015) and Philip & Waters (Reference Philip and Waters2015) provide evidence that calcineurin mediates attachment of Plasmodium merozoites to host erythrocytes, in addition to having other roles across the life cycle. These findings suggest that an inhibitor targetting calcineurin should be most effective when applied at the very end of the intraerythrocytic cycle, in contrast to what was found with FK506 in this study, in the study of Kotaka et al. (Reference Kotaka, Ye, Alag, Hu, Bozdech, Preiser, Yoon and Lescar2008) and by Paul et al. (Reference Paul, Saha, Engelberg, Jiang, Coleman, Kosber, Chen, Ganter, Espy, Gilberger, Gubbels and Duraisingh2015).

Also arguing against the calcineurin hypothesis was the observation that PfFKBP35 or its FKBD alone could bind to calcineurin in the absence of FK506 in vitro (Monaghan et al. Reference Monaghan, Fardis, Revill and Bell2005; Kumar et al. Reference Kumar, Adams, Musiyenko, Shulyayeva and Barik2005). In view of the conflicting result reported by Yoon et al. (Reference Yoon, Kang, Chia, Tang and Yoon2007), we explored the effect of different experimental conditions on this outcome. FK506-independent calcineurin inhibition by PfFKBD was consistent across a range of reagent ratios (Fig. 1). The reason for this difference from human FKBP12, which requires FK506 for calcineurin binding, may be related to one or more regions in which the two FKBD sequences diverge substantially; one possibility is that the N-terminal ‘extension’ of PfFKBP35 is somehow responsible. Whether this interaction is relevant in intact parasites is not known, but our observations make it hard to imagine a scenario in which FK506 targets Plasmodium calcineurin to produce its antimalarial effect.

Yet, another argument against calcineurin and in favour of PfFKBP35 as the target of the FKBP ligands is that non-immunosuppressive, non-calcineurin binding congeners of FK506 retained antimalarial activity (Monaghan et al. Reference Monaghan, Fardis, Revill and Bell2005). Non-macrolactone PfFKBP35 ligands designed using structure-aided methods have achieved even greater antimalarial potency (Harikishore et al. Reference Harikishore, Leow, Niang, Rajan, Pasunooti, Preiser, Liu and Yoon2013a , Reference Harikishore, Niang, Rajan, Preiser and Yoon b ). These observations suggest that designing or discovering potent PfFKBP35 ligands that have low binding to mammalian FKBPs (Blackburn & Walkinshaw, Reference Blackburn and Walkinshaw2011; Bianchin et al. Reference Bianchin, Chubb, Bell, Müller, Cerdan and Radulescu2016) may be a productive approach to antimalarial chemotherapy. Before devoting large resources to this enterprise, it would however be wise to obtain genetic evidence of the validity of PfFKBP35 as a therapeutic target.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

We thank Professor Denis Shields of University College Dublin for helpful comments on the manuscript.

FINANCIAL SUPPORT

This work was supported by grants to A.B. from the Health Research Board (grant number 40/99) and Science Foundation Ireland (grant number 09-RFP-BMT2128).

Footnotes

Present address: Evidence Action, Hanoi, Vietnam.

Present address: Jenner Institute, ORCRB, Roosevelt Drive, Headington, Oxford OX3 7DQ, UK.

References

REFERENCES

Acharya, P., Kumar, R. and Tatu, U. (2007). Chaperoning a cellular upheaval in malaria: heat shock proteins in Plasmodium falciparum . Molecular and Biochemical Parasitology 153, 8594.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Alag, R., Bharatham, N., Dong, A., Hills, T., Harikishore, A., Widjaja, A. A., Shochat, S. G., Hui, R. and Yoon, H. S. (2009). Crystallographic structure of the tetratricopeptide repeat domain of Plasmodium falciparum FKBP35 and its molecular interaction with Hsp90 C-terminal pentapeptide. Protein Science 18, 21152124. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/pro.226 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bell, A. (2005). Antimalarial drug synergism and antagonism: mechanistic and clinical significance. FEMS Microbiology Letters 253, 171184.Google Scholar
Bell, A., Wernli, B., and Franklin, R. M. (1994). Roles of peptidyl-prolyl cis-trans isomerase and calcineurin in the mechanisms of antimalarial action of cyclosporin A, FK506, and rapamycin. Biochemical Pharmacology 48, 495503.Google Scholar
Bell, A., Monaghan, P. and Page, A. P. (2006). Peptidyl-prolyl cis–trans isomerases (immunophilins) and their roles in parasite biochemistry, host–parasite interaction and antiparasitic drug action. International Journal for Parasitology 36, 261–76.Google Scholar
Berriman, M. and Fairlamb, A. H. (1998). Detailed characterization of a cyclophilin from the human malaria parasite Plasmodium falciparum . Biochemical Journal 334, 437445.Google Scholar
Bianchin, A., Allemand, F., Bell, A., Chubb, A. J. and Guichou, J. F. (2015). Two crystal structures of the FK506-binding domain of Plasmodium falciparum FKBP35 in complex with rapamycin at high resolution. Acta Crystallographica Series D: Biological Crystallography 71, 13191327. http://dx.doi.org/10.1107/S1399004715006239 Google Scholar
Bianchin, A., Chubb, A. and Bell, A. (2016). Immunophilins as possible drug targets in Apicomplexan parasites. In Comprehensive Analysis of Parasite Biology – from Metabolism to Drug Discovery (ed. Müller, S., Cerdan, R. and Radulescu, O.), pp. 193212. Wiley VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim, Germany.Google Scholar
Bierer, B. E., Mattila, P. S., Standaert, R. F., Herzenberg, L. A., Burakoff, S. J., Crabtree, G. and Schreiber, S. L. (1990). Two distinct signal transmission pathways in T lymphocytes are inhibited by complexes formed between an immunophilin and either FK506 or rapamycin. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 87, 92319235.Google Scholar
Blackburn, E. A. and Walkinshaw, M. D. (2011). Targeting FKBP isoforms with small-molecule ligands. Current Opinion in Pharmacology 11, 365371. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.coph.2011.04.007 Google Scholar
Braun, P. D., Barglow, K. T., Lin, Y. M., Akompong, T., Briesewitz, R., Ray, G. T., Haldar, K. and Wandless, T. J. (2003). A bifunctional molecule that displays context-dependent cellular activity. Journal of the American Chemical Society 125, 75757580.Google Scholar
Cao, W. and Konsolaki, M. (2011). FKBP immunophilins and Alzheimer's disease: a chaperoned affair. Journal of Bioscience 36, 493498.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cunningham, E., Drag, M., Kafarski, P. and Bell, A. (2008). Chemical target validation studies of aminopeptidase in malaria parasites using alpha-aminoalkylphosphonate and phosphonopeptide inhibitors. Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy 52, 32213228. http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/AAC.01327-07 Google Scholar
Dobson, S., May, T., Berriman, M., Del Vecchio, C., Fairlamb, A. H., Chakrabarti, D. and Barik, S. (1999). Characterization of protein Ser/Thr phosphatases of the malaria parasite, Plasmodium falciparum: inhibition of the parasitic calcineurin by cyclophilin–cyclosporin complex. Molecular and Biochemical Parasitology 99, 167181.Google Scholar
Fennell, B. J., Naughton, J. A., Dempsey, E. and Bell, A. (2006). Cellular and molecular actions of dinitroaniline and phosphorothioamidate herbicides on Plasmodium falciparum: tubulin as a specific antimalarial target. Molecular and Biochemical Parasitology 145, 226238.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Flannery, E. L., Chatterjee, A. K. and Winzeler, E. A. (2013). Antimalarial drug discovery – approaches and progress towards new medicines. Nature Reviews Microbiology 11, 849862. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nrmicro3138 Google Scholar
Frausto, S. D., Lee, E. and Tang, H. (2013). Cyclophilins as modulators of viral replication. Viruses 11, 16841701. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/v5071684 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gaali, S., Gopalakrishnan, R., Wang, Y., Kozany, C., Hausch, F. (2011). The chemical biology of immunophilin ligands. Current Medicinal Chemistry 18, 53555379.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Galat, A. (2003). Peptidylprolyl cis/trans isomerases (immunophilins): biological diversity–targets–functions. Current Topics in Medicinal Chemistry 3, 13151347.Google Scholar
Galat, A. and Bua, J. (2010). Molecular aspects of cyclophilins mediating therapeutic actions of their ligands. Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences 67, 34673488.Google Scholar
Gavigan, C. S., Machado, S. G., Dalton, J. P. and Bell, A. (2001). Analysis of antimalarial synergy between bestatin and endoprotease inhibitors using statistical response-surface modelling. Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy 45, 31753181.Google Scholar
Gavigan, C. S., Kiely, S. P., Hirtzlin, J. and Bell, A. (2003). Cyclosporin-binding proteins of Plasmodium falciparum . International Journal for Parasitology 33, 987996.Google Scholar
Gavigan, C. S., Shen, M., Machado, S. G. and Bell, A. (2007). Influence of the Plasmodium falciparum P-glycoprotein homologue 1 (pfmdr1 gene product) on the antimalarial action of cyclosporin. Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy 59, 197203.Google Scholar
Greco, W. R., Bravo, G. and Parsons, J. C. (1995). The search for synergy: a critical review from a response surface perspective. Pharmacological Reviews 47, 331385.Google Scholar
Harikishore, A. and Yoon, H. S. (2015). Immunophilins: structures, mechanisms and ligands. Current Molecular Pharmacology 9, 3747.Google Scholar
Harikishore, A., Leow, M. L., Niang, M., Rajan, S., Pasunooti, K. K., Preiser, P. R., Liu, X. and Yoon, H. S. (2013 a). Adamantyl derivative as a potent inhibitor of Plasmodium FK506 binding protein 35. ACS Medicinal Chemistry Letters 4, 10971101. http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/ml400306r Google Scholar
Harikishore, A., Niang, M., Rajan, S., Preiser, P. R. and Yoon, H. S. (2013 b). Small molecule Plasmodium FKBP35 inhibitor as a potential antimalaria agent. Scientific Reports 3, 2501. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep02501.Google Scholar
Hirtzlin, J., Färber, P. M., Franklin, R. M. and Bell, A. (1995). Molecular and biochemical characterization of a Plasmodium falciparum cyclophilin containing a cleavable signal sequence. European Journal of Biochemistry 232, 765772.Google Scholar
Juvvadi, P. R., Lee, S. C., Heitman, J. and Steinbach, W. J. (2016). Calcineurin in fungal virulence and drug resistance: prospects for harnessing targeted inhibition of calcineurin for an antifungal therapeutic approach. Virulence Jun 20, 1–12 (E-pub) http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/21505594.2016.1201250 Google Scholar
Kotaka, M., Ye, H., Alag, R., Hu, G., Bozdech, Z., Preiser, P. R., Yoon, H. S. and Lescar, J. (2008). Crystal structure of the FK506 binding domain of Plasmodium falciparum FKBP35 in complex with FK506. Biochemistry 47, 59515961. http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/bi800004u Google Scholar
Kumar, R., Musiyenko, A., Oldenburg, A., Adams, B., Barik, S. (2004). Post-translational generation of constitutively active cores from larger phosphatases in the malaria parasite, Plasmodium falciparum: implications for proteomics. BMC Molecular Biology 5, 6.Google Scholar
Kumar, R., Adams, B., Musiyenko, A., Shulyayeva, O. and Barik, S. (2005). The FK506-binding protein of the malaria parasite, Plasmodium falciparum, is a FK506-sensitive chaperone with FK506-independent calcineurin-inhibitory activity. Molecular and Biochemical Parasitology 141, 163173.Google Scholar
Lambros, C. and Vanderberg, J. P. (1979). Synchronization of Plasmodium falciparum erythrocytic stages in culture. Journal of Parasitology 65, 418420.Google Scholar
Le Manach, C., Scheurer, C., Sax, S., Schleiferböck, S., Cabrera, D. G., Younis, Y., Paquet, T., Street, L., Smith, P., Ding, X. C., Waterson, D., Witty, M. J., Leroy, D., Chibale, K. and Wittlin, S. (2013). Fast in vitro methods to determine the speed of action and the stage-specificity of anti-malarials in Plasmodium falciparum . Malaria Journal 12, 424. http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1475-2875-12-424 Google Scholar
Leneghan, D. and Bell, A. (2015). Immunophilin–protein interactions in Plasmodium falciparum . Parasitology 142, 14041414. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0031182015000803 Google Scholar
Marín-Menéndez, A. and Bell, A. (2011). Overexpression, purification and assessment of cyclosporin binding of a family of cyclophilins and cyclophilin-like proteins of the human malarial parasite Plasmodium falciparum . Protein Expression and Purification 78, 225234. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pep.2011.04.012 Google Scholar
Monaghan, P. and Bell, A. (2005). A Plasmodium falciparum FK506-binding protein (FKBP) with peptidyl-prolyl cis-trans isomerase and chaperone activities. Molecular and Biochemical Parasitology 139, 185195.Google Scholar
Monaghan, P., Fardis, M., Revill, W. P. and Bell, A. (2005). Antimalarial effects of macrolactones related to FK520 (ascomycin) are independent of the immunosuppressive properties of the compounds. Journal of Infectious Diseases 191, 13421349.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Paul, A. S., Saha, S., Engelberg, K., Jiang, R. H., Coleman, B. I., Kosber, A. L., Chen, C. T., Ganter, M., Espy, N., Gilberger, T. W., Gubbels, M. J. and Duraisingh, M. T. (2015). Parasite calcineurin regulates host cell recognition and attachment by Apicomplexans. Cell Host and Microbe 18, 4960. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.chom.2015.06.003 Google Scholar
Philip, N. and Waters, A. P. (2015). Conditional degradation of Plasmodium calcineurin reveals functions in parasite colonization of both host and vector. Cell Host and Microbe 18, 122131. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.chom.2015.05.018 Google Scholar
Reddy, G. R. (1995). Cloning and characterization of a Plasmodium falciparum cyclophilin gene that is stage-specifically expressed. Molecular and Biochemical Parasitology 73, 111121.Google Scholar
Siekierka, J. J., Staruch, M. J., Hung, S. H. and Sigal, N. H. (1989). FK-506, a potent novel immunosuppressive agent, binds to a cytosolic protein which is distinct from the cyclosporin A-binding protein, cyclophilin. Journal of Immunology 143, 15801583.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Singh, S., More, K. R. and Chitnis, C. E. (2014). Role of calcineurin and actin dynamics in regulated secretion of microneme proteins in Plasmodium falciparum merozoites during erythrocyte invasion. Cellular Microbiology 16, 5063. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/cmi.12177 Google Scholar
Yeh, P., Tschumi, A. I. and Kishony, R. (2006). Functional classification of drugs by properties of their pairwise interactions. Nature Genetics 38, 489494.Google Scholar
Yoon, H. R., Kang, C. B., Chia, J., Tang, K. and Yoon, H. S. (2007). Expression, purification, and molecular characterization of Plasmodium falciparum FK506-binding protein 35 (PfFKBP35). Protein Expression and Purification 53, 179185.Google Scholar
Zimmermann, G. R., Lehár, J. and Keith, C. T. (2007). Multi-target therapeutics: when the whole is greater than the sum of the parts. Drug Discovery Today 12, 3442.Google Scholar
Figure 0

Fig. 1. Effects of different reagent ratios on calcineurin (CaN) binding by PfFKBD in the presence and absence of FK506. Activity of calcineurin was measured by the fluorescence of a rhodamine-conjugated peptide substrate that, upon dephosphorylation by calcineurin, is digested by a protease, releasing highly fluorescent rhodamine. The fluorescence attributable to 40 nm calcineurin was set as 100%. The effects of increasing molar ratio of PfFKBD to calcineurin (x-axis) and of PfFKBD to FK506 (circles, no FK506; triangles, 1:1 ratio; squares, 1 PfFKBD:10 FK506) on the activity of calcineurin were assessed. Bars show the SEM of values from three replicate experiments. To ensure that reduced fluorescence was not due to inhibition of the protease, a control peptide whose fluorescence is independent of phosphorylated state was incorporated into each reaction. No inhibition of protease occurred (data not shown).

Figure 1

Fig. 2. Stage-dependent effects of FK506 and rapamycin on cultured blood-stage P. falciparum. Parasite cultures were age-selected by sorbitol treatment and grown to early rings (RE, 0–6 h p.i.), late rings/early trophozoites (RL/T, 12–18 h p.i.), mature trophozoites (T, 24–30 h p.i.) or schizonts (S, 36–42 h p.i.). Median inhibitory concentrations (IC50) were determined for cultures commencing at RE (stage 1), RL/T (stage 2), T (stage 3) and S (stage 4) over periods of 12, 24, 36 and 48 h using the pLDH method. IC50 values indicated in blue (FK506) and red (rapamycin) are averages of two determinations, each titrated in duplicate. The arrows indicate the progression of untreated parasites in the same experiment. *, IC50 values are higher than those from preceding time points, presumably because surviving parasites multiplied on entering a second intra-erythrocytic cycle (dotted red line).

Figure 2

Fig. 3. Kinetics of killing or irreversible growth arrest of trophozoite-stage P. falciparum by FK506 and rapamycin. Cultures were age selected (24–30 h post-invasion) by sorbitol treatment and exposed for 0, 3, 6 or 9 h to 30 µm FK506, rapamycin or to an equivalent concentration of solvent as a control. Parasitized erythrocytes were then washed free of drug and recultured for 48 h before counting on Giemsa-stained thin smears. Experiments were done in duplicate with >1000 erythrocytes counted on each slide; vertical bars show SEM.

Figure 3

Fig. 4. Examples of antimalarial drug interaction analysis using the Horizon Chalice™ Analyzer software. (A–D) combination of FK506 and Rap; E–H: combination of FK506 and geldanamycin. (A, E) Isobolograms showing 50% inhibitory concentrations (IC50) of the two compounds alone and in the presence of the other. Each compound was titrated in 8 2-fold steps alone and in combination. Susceptibility was measured on parasite line 3D7 after 72 h using the pLDH method and at least three independent determinations were done. Concentrations are shown on a relative scale where IC50 = 1. Points around the diagonal line are suggestive of additivity; points below left suggest synergism, and above right, antagonism. (B, F) ‘Observed’ inhibition of parasite growth (%) by each compound. For the purposes of the analysis, concentrations are shown on a relative scale (starting at around 4 × IC50). (C, G) ‘Expected’ inhibition of parasite growth by the various combinations based on inhibition determined using the compounds alone and assuming no interaction (i.e. Loewe additivity). (D, H) ‘Deviation’ of the observed inhibition values from those expected from the Loewe additivity model. Positive values (blue) indicate that inhibition was more than expected and negative values (purple) less than expected. The volume (Vol.) is a measure of the overall deviation of the data from those expected under Loewe additivity: a large positive value indicates synergism, a large negative value indicates antagonism, and values close to 0 indicate additivity.

Figure 4

Table 1. Interactions between FK506, Rap and CsA based on analysis using the Horizon Chalice™ Analyzer software (see Fig. 4)