We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
I recall how Martin Hofmann and I found the groupoid model of type theory in the early 1990s.
Hofmann, M. and Streicher, T. (1994). The groupoid model refutes uniqueness of identity proofs. In: Proceedings of LiCS94, 208–212.10.1109/LICS.1994.316071CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hofmann, M. and Streicher, T. (1996). The groupoid interpretation of type theory. In: Sambin, G. (ed.) Twenty-Five Years of Constructive Type Theory, OUP.Google Scholar
Seely, R. A. G. (1984). Locally cartesian closed categories and type theory. Mathematical Proceedings of the Cambridge Philosophical Society95(1) 33–48.10.1017/S0305004100061284CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Streicher, T. (1989). Semantics of Type Theory. Thesis University of Passau.Google Scholar
Streicher, T. (1994). Investigations into Intensional Type Theory. Habilitation Thesis, Ludwig Maximilians Universität, Munich.Google Scholar