Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-v2bm5 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-06T12:47:02.772Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Elementary theory of valued fields with a valuation-preserving automorphism

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 July 2010

Salih Azgin
Affiliation:
Department of Mathematics and Statistics, McMaster University, 1280 Main Street, West Hamilton, Ontario L8S 4K1, Canada (sazgin@math.mcmaster.ca)
Lou van den Dries
Affiliation:
Department of Mathematics, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, 1409 W. Green Street, Urbana, IL 61801, USA (vddries@math.uiuc.edu)
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

We consider valued fields with a value-preserving automorphism and improve on model-theoretic results by Bélair, Macintyre and Scanlon on these objects by dropping assumptions on the residue difference field. In the equicharacteristic 0 case we describe the induced structure on the value group and the residue difference field.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2010

References

1.Azgin, S., Model theory of valued difference fields, PhD thesis, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign (2007).Google Scholar
2.Azgin, S. and van den Dries, L., Equivalence of valued difference fields with a valuation preserving automorphism, preprint (arXiv:0902.0422v1; 2009).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3.Bélair, L., Macintyre, A. and Scanlon, T., Model theory of Frobenius on Witt vectors, Am. J. Math. 129 (2007), 665721.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4.Cherlin, G., Model theoretic algebra—selected topics, Lecture Notes in Mathematics, Volume 521 (Springer, 1976).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5.Cohn, R. M., Difference algebra (Interscience/John Wiley & Sons, 1965).Google Scholar
6.Joyal, A., δ-anneaux et vecteurs de Witt, C. R. Math.-Math. Rep. Acad. Sci. Canada 7 (1985), 177182.Google Scholar
7.Kaplansky, I., Maximal fields with valuations, Duke Math. J. 9 (1942), 303321.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8.Kochen, S., The model theory of local fields, in Proc. Logic Conf., Kiel, 1974, Lecture Notes in Mathematics, Volume 499, pp. 384425 (Springer, 1975).Google Scholar
9.Scanlon, T., A model complete theory of valued D-fields, J. Symb. Logic 65 (2001), 17581784.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10.Scanlon, T., Quantifier elimination for the relative Frobenius, in Valuation Theory and Its Applications, Saskatoon, SK, 1999, Volume II, Fields Institute Communications, Volume 33 pp. 323352 (American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI, 2003).Google Scholar
11.Serre, J. P., Local fields (Springer, 1979).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12.Whaples, G., Galois cohomology of additive polynomials and nth power mappings of fields, Duke Math. J. 24 (1957), 143150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar