Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-b95js Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-06T08:45:10.584Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Extraordinary and upper-hybrid waves in spin quantum magnetoplasmas with vacuum polarization effect

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 July 2021

Jun Zhu*
Affiliation:
School of Physics and Electronic Engineering, Shanxi University, Taiyuan 030006, PR China
Xiaoshan Liu
Affiliation:
School of Physics and Electronic Engineering, Shanxi University, Taiyuan 030006, PR China
Yuee Luo
Affiliation:
Department of Mechanical and Electronic Engineering, Jingdezhen University, Jingdezhen 333000, PR China
*
Email address for correspondence: zhujun@sxu.edu.cn
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The propagation of extraordinary and upper-hybrid waves in spin quantum magnetoplasmas with vacuum polarization effect is investigated. Based on the quantum magnetohydrodynamics model including Bohm potential, arbitrary relativistic degeneracy pressure and spin force, and Maxwell's equations modified by the spin current and vacuum polarization current, the dispersion relations of extraordinary and upper-hybrid waves are derived. The analytical and numerical results show that quantum effects (Bohm potential, degeneracy pressure and spin magnetization energy) and the vacuum polarization effect modify the propagation of the extraordinary wave. Under the action of a strong magnetic field, the plasma frequency is obviously increased by the vacuum polarization effect.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press

1 Introduction

As an emerging research field of plasma physics, the quantum plasma, composed of ions and degenerate electrons, has attracted much attention and research interest (Markowich, Ringhofer & Schmeiser Reference Markowich, Ringhofer and Schmeiser1990; Haas, Manfredi & Feix Reference Haas, Manfredi and Feix2000; Harding & Lai Reference Harding and Lai2006; Brodin et al. Reference Brodin, Marklund, Eliasson and Shukla2007). An example of the real physical environments in which a quantum plasma exists is the dense astrophysical objects, such as white dwarfs and neutron stars. White dwarfs resist gravitational collapse by producing electron degeneracy pressures with extremely high number density, typically as high as $10^{30} \ \textrm {cm}^{-3}$, whereas neutron stars have a higher density. Electrons in the quantum plasma obey the Fermi–Dirac distribution. According to the Pauli exclusion principle, the thermal pressure is replaced by the degenerate pressure between electrons (Haas Reference Haas2011). In dense astrophysical plasmas, the conditions of high-electron-number density and low temperature make the thermal de Broglie wavelength of electrons become equal to or even larger than the characteristic scale of the plasma system, and the quantum tunnelling effect represented by the Bohm potential will appear (Bohm Reference Bohm1952; Manfredi Reference Manfredi2005; Shukla Reference Shukla2006; Shukla & Eliasson Reference Shukla and Eliasson2006).

Since electrons are fermions (spin-1/2 quantum particles), under the action of a strong magnetic field there will appear an electron-spin current and a spin force acting on electrons due to the Bohr magnetization. In highly magnetized or cold plasmas, the spin effect is significant (Shukla & Eliasson Reference Shukla and Eliasson2011). The spin magnetohydrodynamic model was proposed by Marklund & Brodin (Reference Marklund and Brodin2007), in which the electrons were treated as a single fluid. Andreev then gave a generalized form of the quantum hydrodynamics (QHD) model for spin-1/2 particles (Andreev Reference Andreev2015), in which the electrons of spin-up and spin-down were treated as two different fluids. This model is called the separate spin evolution quantum hydrodynamics (SSE-QHD) model. Since then, a lot of research on the electron spin-1/2 effect has been carried out. Iqbal investigated the spin magnetoacoustic wave and hybrid wave instabilities (Iqbal, Khan & Murtaza Reference Iqbal, Khan and Murtaza2018a; Iqbal, Khanum & Murtaza Reference Iqbal, Khanum and Murtaza2018b; Iqbal et al. Reference Iqbal, Ayub, Shah and Murtaza2019a,Reference Iqbal, Younas, Khan and Murtazab), which indicated that the dispersion of an upper-hybrid wave is affected by spin effects. The extraordinary wave in a spin-1/2 quantum plasma was studied by Andreev (Reference Andreev2017). A magnetohydrodynamic wave with relativistic electrons and positrons in degenerate spin-1/2 astrophysical plasmas was investigated by Maroof et al. (Reference Maroof, Ali, Mushtaq and Qamar2015). A magnetohydrodynamic spin wave in degenerate electron–positron plasmas was analysed by Mushtaq et al. (Reference Mushtaq, Maroof, Ahmad and Qamar2012).

The quantum electrodynamic (QED) effect in a strong field is a very large research area. The QED effect has been experimentally confirmed under many different conditions, but there is still one that has not been verified, called the Schwinger mechanism. QED theory points out that a vacuum will exhibit some special properties in the strong field. For example, when the field intensity reaches Schwinger's critical strength, the vacuum will break down, and a virtual electron–positron pair can be spontaneously excited into a real electron–positron pair. When the field strength is lower than the Schwinger's critical strength, the vacuum will still show a weak nonlinear dielectric effect due to the quantum fluctuation of the virtual electron–positron pair, which is the so-called QED vacuum polarization effect (Goldreich & Julian Reference Goldreich and Julian1969; Gedalin, Merose & Gruman Reference Gedalin, Merose and Gruman1998; Marklund & Shukla Reference Marklund and Shukla2006). The vacuum polarization effect can induce many new physical phenomena, such as photon–photon scattering, electron–positron pair generation, vacuum birefringence and photon acceleration in a vacuum. Shukla & Stenflo (Reference Shukla and Stenflo2008) investigated the dispersion relations for elliptically polarized extraordinary waves and linearly polarized ordinary waves propagating across an external magnetic field in a dense magnetoplasma. Lundin et al. (Reference Lundin, Stenflo, Brodin, Marklund and Shukla2007) investigated circularly polarized waves propagating along an external magnetic field with a vacuum polarization effect. Stenflo et al. (Reference Stenflo, Brodin, Marklund and Shukla2005) investigated a new low-frequency circularly polarized electromagnetic waves in an electron–positron plasma, taking into account the QED effect involving photon–photon scattering.

In this paper, we investigate the propagation of extraordinary and upper-hybrid waves in dense magnetoplasmas composed of immobile ions and electrons, taking into account QED vacuum polarization, as well as the Bohm potential, arbitrary relativistic degeneracy pressure and spin magnetization energy due to the electron-1/2 spin effect. As far as we know, only Shukla & Stenflo (Reference Shukla and Stenflo2008) have previously studied the dispersion relationship of electromagnetic wave propagation in a dense magnetized plasma, in which the spin effect and the QED vacuum polarization effect were considered. However, in their theoretical model, the spin effect is only considered to modify the electron momentum equation, and it is not considered to modify Maxwell's equations. The theoretical model used here is composed of the electron momentum equation, which includes Bohm potential, arbitrary relativistic degeneracy pressure and spin force, and Maxwell's equations modified by the spin current and vacuum polarization current. This paper is organized as follows. In § 2, the quantum magnetohydrodynamics model composed of the continuity equation and the momentum equation, including Bohm potential, arbitrary relativistic degeneracy pressure and spin force, is presented, and Maxwell's equations modified by the spin current and vacuum polarization current are also provided. In § 3, starting from the quantum magnetohydrodynamics model and the Poisson equation, the dispersion relation of the upper-hybrid wave is deduced. In § 4, based on the spin quantum magnetohydrodynamics model and the Maxwell's equations, the dispersion relation of an extraordinary wave is derived. In § 5, the contributions of quantum effects and the vacuum polarization effect are quantitatively calculated and discussed with the real parameters of dense astrophysical plasmas.

2 Basic equations

In this paper, we consider a zero-temperature plasma composed of ions and electrons. Since the mass of ions is much more than that of electrons, ions are treated as a stationary neutralizing background, and only the motion of electrons is considered. The quantum magnetohydrodynamics model for spin-1/2 electrons is composed of the continuity equation:

(2.1)\begin{equation} \frac{\partial n}{\partial t}+\boldsymbol{\nabla}\boldsymbol{\cdot}(n\boldsymbol{u})=0, \end{equation}

and the momentum equation (Brodin & Marklund Reference Brodin and Marklund2007; Marklund & Brodin Reference Marklund and Brodin2007):

(2.2)\begin{align} mn\left(\frac{\partial}{\partial t}+\boldsymbol{u}\boldsymbol{\cdot}\boldsymbol{\nabla}\right)\boldsymbol{u}={-}en\left(\boldsymbol{E}+\frac{\boldsymbol{u}}{c}\times \boldsymbol{B}\right)-\boldsymbol{\nabla} P+\frac{\hbar^{2}n}{2m}\boldsymbol{\nabla}\left(\frac{\nabla^{2}\sqrt{n}}{\sqrt{n}}\right)+\frac{2n\mu_{B}}{\hbar}\boldsymbol{\nabla}(\boldsymbol{S}\boldsymbol{\cdot}\boldsymbol{B}), \end{align}

where $n$ is the number density of electrons, $\boldsymbol {u}$ is the fluid velocity of electrons, $e$ is the charge of the electron, $m$ is the electron mass, $\mu _{B}=e\hbar /2mc$ is the Bohr magneton and $\hbar$ is Planck's constant divided by $2{\rm \pi}$. Here, $P$ denotes the relativistic electron degeneracy pressure in dense plasmas, which can be written as (Shukla & Eliasson Reference Shukla and Eliasson2011)

(2.3)\begin{equation} P=\frac{{\rm \pi} m^{4}_{e}c^{5}}{3h^{3}}f(\xi), \end{equation}

where $f(\xi )=\xi (2\xi ^{2}-3)(1+\xi ^{2})^{1/2}+3\sinh ^{-1}(\xi )$, $\xi =p/mc$ and $p=(3{\rm \pi} ^{2}n)^{1/3}\hbar$ is the momentum of an electron on the Fermi surface. Expanding (2.3) around the unperturbed density of electrons $n_{0}$ by the Taylor series expansion and neglecting the higher order terms, we have (Maroof et al. Reference Maroof, Ali, Mushtaq and Qamar2015; El-Shamy Reference El-Shamy2015)

(2.4)\begin{equation} P=P_{0}+\frac{mv^{2}_{Fe}}{3\gamma_{0}}n_{1}, \end{equation}

where $n_{1}$ denotes the perturbed electron number density, $v_{Fe}=(3{\rm \pi} ^{2}n_{0})^{1/3}\hbar /m$ is the Fermi velocity of electrons, and $\gamma _{0}=1/\sqrt {1-\xi ^{2}_{0}}$ with $\xi _{0}=p_{0}/mc$, where $p_{0}=(3{\rm \pi} ^{2}n_{0})^{1/3}\hbar$ is the Fermi momentum of electrons.

Neglecting the spin–thermal coupling terms and the nonlinear spin fluid contribution, the spin vector $\boldsymbol {S}$ in (2.2) satisfies the evolution equation

(2.5)\begin{equation} \frac{\textrm{d}\boldsymbol{S}}{\textrm{d}t}=\frac{2\mu_{B}}{\hbar}\boldsymbol{B}\times\boldsymbol{S}. \end{equation}

Neglecting the spin inertia, the spin vector is determined from $\boldsymbol {B}\times \boldsymbol {S}=0$, which has a solution

(2.6)\begin{equation} \boldsymbol{S}={-}\frac{\hbar}{2}\eta\left(\frac{\mu_{B} B}{k_{B}T_{Fe}}\right)\boldsymbol{\hat{B} }, \end{equation}

where $B$ denotes the magnitude of the magnetic field, and $\boldsymbol {\hat {B}}$ is a unit vector in the direction of the magnetic field. Here, $\eta (\alpha )=\tanh \alpha$ is the Brillouin function, where $\alpha =\mu _{B}B_{0}/(k_{B}T_{F})$.

The QED vacuum polarization effect is formulated by the Heisenberg–Euler Lagrangian density of electromagnetic fields, which is expressed as (Heisenberg & Euler Reference Heisenberg and Euler1936; Marklund & Shukla Reference Marklund and Shukla2006)

(2.7)\begin{equation} \mathcal{L}=\frac{1}{8{\rm \pi}}(E^{2}-B^{2})+\frac{\xi}{8{\rm \pi}}[(E^{2}-B^{2}) +(\boldsymbol{E}\boldsymbol{\cdot}\boldsymbol{B})^{2}], \end{equation}

where $\xi =\hbar e^{4}/(45{\rm \pi} m^{4}c^{7})$, and $c$ is the speed of light in vacuum. The first term of (2.7) is the classical Lagrangian density, and the second term is the correction term originating from the vacuum polarization effect. The effective polarization and magnetization vectors of the vacuum derived from Lagrangian density can be expressed as (Shen, Yu & Wang Reference Shen, Yu and Wang2003; Lundin et al. Reference Lundin, Stenflo, Brodin, Marklund and Shukla2007)

(2.8)\begin{equation} \boldsymbol{P}=\frac{\xi}{4{\rm \pi}}[2(E^{2}-B^{2})\boldsymbol{E} +7(\boldsymbol{E}\boldsymbol{\cdot}\boldsymbol{B})\boldsymbol{B}], \end{equation}

and

(2.9)\begin{equation} \boldsymbol{M}=\frac{\xi}{4{\rm \pi}}[{-}2(E^{2}-B^{2})\boldsymbol{B} +7(\boldsymbol{E}\boldsymbol{\cdot}\boldsymbol{B})\boldsymbol{E}]. \end{equation}

Assuming that the amplitude of oscillation is small, we can solve the system by using linearized equations. The plasma equilibrium is assumed as $\boldsymbol {E}_{0}=0$, $\boldsymbol {u}_{0}=0$, therefore, the linearized continuity equation is derived as

(2.10)\begin{equation} \frac{\partial n_{1}}{\partial t} +n_{0}\boldsymbol{\nabla}\boldsymbol{\cdot}\boldsymbol{u}_{1}=0, \end{equation}

and the linearized momentum equation is obtained as

(2.11)\begin{equation} \displaystyle\frac{\partial\boldsymbol{u}_{1}}{\partial t}={-}\frac{e}{m}\left(\boldsymbol{E}_{1}+\frac{\boldsymbol{u}_{1}}{c}\times \boldsymbol{B}_{0}\right)-\frac{v^{2}_{Fe}}{3n_{0}\gamma_{0}}\boldsymbol{\nabla} n_{1} +\frac{\hbar^{2}}{4m^{2}n_{0}}\boldsymbol{\nabla}\nabla^{2}n_{1}+\frac{2\mu_{B}}{m\hbar}\boldsymbol{\nabla}(\boldsymbol{S}\boldsymbol{\cdot}\boldsymbol{B}_{1}). \end{equation}

The linearized Maxwell equations modified by the vacuum polarization effect and spin effect can be presented as

(2.12)\begin{gather} \boldsymbol{\nabla}\times \boldsymbol{E}_{1}={-}\frac{1}{c}\frac{\partial \boldsymbol{B}_{1}}{\partial t}, \end{gather}
(2.13)\begin{gather} \boldsymbol{\nabla}\times \boldsymbol{B}_{1}=\frac{1}{c}\frac{\partial \boldsymbol{E}_{1}}{\partial t}+\frac{4{\rm \pi}}{c}(\boldsymbol{J}_{e}+\boldsymbol{J}_{M}+\boldsymbol{J}_{\textrm{vac}}), \end{gather}
(2.14)\begin{gather} \boldsymbol{\nabla}\boldsymbol{\cdot}\boldsymbol{E}_{1}=4{\rm \pi}(\rho_{e}+\rho_{\textrm{vac}}), \end{gather}

where $\rho _{e}=-en_{1}$ and $\boldsymbol {J}_{e}=-en_{0}\boldsymbol {u}_{1}$ are the charge and current density of electrons, respectively. Then $\boldsymbol {J}_{M}=-c\boldsymbol {\nabla }\times (2n_{0}\mu _{B}\boldsymbol {S}/\hbar )$ is the magnetization spin current density, $\rho _{\textrm {vac}}=-\boldsymbol {\nabla }\boldsymbol {\cdot }\boldsymbol {P}$ and $\boldsymbol {J}_{\textrm {vac}}=\partial \boldsymbol {P}/\partial \boldsymbol {t}+c\boldsymbol {\nabla }\times \boldsymbol {M}$ are the effective vacuum charge and current density, respectively.

3 Dispersion relation of upper-hybrid wave

We choose the external magnetic field as $\boldsymbol {B}_{0}=B_{0}\hat {z}$ with respect to the propagation direction determined by the wavenumber $\boldsymbol {k}=k\hat {y}$ of the wave. Since the upper-hybrid wave is an electrostatic wave, the first-order electromagnetic fields are chosen as $\boldsymbol {E}_{1}=E_{1}\hat {y}$ and $\boldsymbol {B}_{1}=0$, as shown in figure 1. It should be noted that $E^{2}$ as well as $B^{2}$ in (2.8) are constant and that $\boldsymbol {E}\boldsymbol {\cdot }\boldsymbol {B}=0$. The effective vacuum charge density in (2.14) can be written as

(3.1)\begin{equation} \rho_{\textrm{vac}}={-}\frac{\xi}{2{\rm \pi}}(E^{2}-B^{2})\boldsymbol{\nabla}\boldsymbol{\cdot}\boldsymbol{E}_{1}. \end{equation}

Inserting (3.1) into (2.14), we derive a new Poisson equation modified by the vacuum polarization correction as

(3.2)\begin{equation} \boldsymbol{\nabla}\boldsymbol{\cdot}\boldsymbol{E}_{1}=4{\rm \pi}\rho_{e}(1-\beta)^{{-}1}, \end{equation}

where

(3.3)\begin{equation} \beta=2\xi(B_{0}^{2}-E_{1}^{2})\sim\frac{2\alpha B_{0}^{2}}{45{\rm \pi} B_{c}^{2}}. \end{equation}

Here $E_{1}\ll B_{0}$ is the amplitude of the firs-order electric field, $\alpha =e^{2}/\hbar c$ is the fine structure constant, and $B_{c}= m^{2}c^{3}/\hbar e\sim 4.44\times 10^{13} {\rm Gs}$ is the Schwinger critical magnetic field.

Figure 1. Cartesian coordinate system, chosen such that $\boldsymbol {B}_{0}$ is along $\hat {z}$ and $\boldsymbol {E}_{1}$ is along $\hat {y}$.

Supposing the perturbations are proportional to $\exp [\textrm {i}(ky-\omega t)]$, (2.10) and (2.11) become

(3.4)\begin{equation} \displaystyle-\textrm{i}\omega\boldsymbol{u}_{1}={-}\frac{e}{m}\left(\boldsymbol{E}_{1}+\frac{\boldsymbol{u}_{1}}{c}\times \boldsymbol{B}_{0}\right)-\frac{\textrm{i}kv^{2}_{Fe}n_{1}}{3\gamma_{0}n_{0}}\hat{y} -\frac{\textrm{i}\hbar^{2}k^{3}n_{1}}{4m^{2}n_{0}}\hat{y} \end{equation}

and

(3.5)\begin{equation} n_{1}=\frac{ku_{1y}}{\omega}n_{0}. \end{equation}

By solving (3.4) and (3.5), we have the component $u_{1y}$ of the fluid velocity as

(3.6)\begin{equation} \displaystyle u_{1y}={-}\frac{\textrm{i}eE_{1}}{\omega m}\left(1-\frac{\omega^{2}_{c}} {\omega^{2}}-\varDelta\right)^{{-}1}, \end{equation}

where $\omega _{c}=eB_{0}/mc$ is the electron cyclotron frequency and $\varDelta ={k^{2}v^{2}_{Fe}}/{3\gamma _{0}\omega ^{2}} +{\hbar ^{2}k^{4}}/{4m^{2}\omega ^{2}}$ is the quantum correction.

Inserting (3.6) into (3.2), we derive the dispersion relation of upper-hybrid wave as

(3.7)\begin{equation} \omega_{h}^{2}=\frac{\omega_{p}^{2}}{1-\beta}+\omega^{2}_{c} +\frac{k^{2}v^{2}_{Fe}}{3\gamma_{0}}+\frac{\hbar^{2}k^{4}}{4m^{2}}. \end{equation}

When setting $\hbar \rightarrow 0$ and $\beta \rightarrow 0$, (3.7) can be degenerated to the frequency of upper-hybrid oscillation in the classical cold plasmas, and it indicates that an upper-hybrid oscillation can propagate in cold plasmas due to quantum effects.

4 Dispersion relation of an extraordinary wave

We choose the external magnetic field as $\boldsymbol {B}_{0}=B_{0}\hat {z}$ with respect to the propagation direction determined by the wavenumber $\boldsymbol {k}=k\hat {y}$ of the wave. Since we investigate the propagation of an extraordinary wave, the first-order electromagnetic fields are particularly chosen as $\boldsymbol {E}_{1}=E_{1x}\hat {x}+E_{1y}\hat {y}$ and $\boldsymbol {B}_{1}=B_{1}\hat {z}=-kcE_{1x}/\omega \hat {z}$, as shown in figure 2. It should be noted that $E^{2}$ as well as $B^{2}$ are constant and that $\boldsymbol {E}\boldsymbol {\cdot }\boldsymbol {B}=0$. This means that

(4.1)\begin{equation} \boldsymbol{J}_{\textrm{vac}}={-}\frac{\xi}{2{\rm \pi}}(E^{2}-B^{2})\left(\boldsymbol{\nabla}\times \boldsymbol{B}_{1}-\frac{1}{c}\frac{\partial \boldsymbol{E}_{1}}{\partial t}\right). \end{equation}

Inserting (4.1) into (2.13) we derive a new equation

(4.2)\begin{equation} \boldsymbol{\nabla}\times \boldsymbol{B}_{1}=\frac{1}{c}\frac{\partial \boldsymbol{E}_{1}}{\partial t}+\frac{4{\rm \pi}}{c}(\boldsymbol{J}_{e}+\boldsymbol{J}_{M})(1-\chi)^{{-}1}, \end{equation}

where

(4.3)\begin{equation} \chi=\frac{2\alpha}{45{\rm \pi} B_{c}^{2}}[(n^{2}-1)E_{1}^{2}+B_{0}^{2}]. \end{equation}

Here $n=kc/\omega$ is the index of refraction and $E_{1}$ is the amplitude of the first-order electric field.

Figure 2. Cartesian coordinate system, chosen such that $\boldsymbol {B}_{0}$ and $\boldsymbol {B}_{1}$ are along $\hat {z}$, and $\boldsymbol {E}_{1}$ is in the plane of $xoy$.

The spin magnetization current density in (2.13) is calculated as

(4.4)\begin{equation} \boldsymbol{J}_{M}=\frac{\textrm{i}\mu_{B}\eta(\alpha)n_{0}k^{2}v_{1y}}{\omega}\hat{x}. \end{equation}

Supposing the perturbations are proportional to $\exp [\textrm {i}(ky-\omega t)]$, (2.10) and (2.11) become

(4.5)\begin{equation} \displaystyle-\textrm{i}\omega\boldsymbol{u}_{1}={-}\frac{e}{m}\left(\boldsymbol{E}_{1}+\frac{\boldsymbol{u}_{1}}{c}\times \boldsymbol{B}_{0}\right)-\frac{\textrm{i}kv^{2}_{Fe}n_{1}}{3\gamma_{0}n_{0}}\hat{y} -\frac{\textrm{i}\hbar^{2}k^{3}n_{1}}{4m^{2}n_{0}}\hat{y}+\frac{\textrm{i}\mu_{B}\eta(\alpha)k^{2}c E_{1x}}{m\omega}\hat{y} \end{equation}

and

(4.6)\begin{equation} n_{1}=\frac{ku_{1y}}{\omega}n_{0}. \end{equation}

By solving (4.5) and (4.6), we have the two components $u_{1x}$ and $u_{1y}$ of the fluid velocity as

(4.7)\begin{equation} {\begin{array}{*{1}c} \displaystyle u_{1x}=\frac{e}{\omega m}\left\{-iE_{1x}-\left[\frac{i\omega^{2}_{c}}{\omega^{2}}\left(1-\frac{\omega}{\omega_{c}}S\right)E_{1x}+\frac{\omega_{c}}{\omega}E_{1y}\right]\left(1-\frac{\omega^{2}_{c}}{\omega^{2}}-\Delta\right)^{-1}\right\},\\ \displaystyle u_{1y}=\frac{e}{\omega m}\left[\frac{\omega_{c}}{\omega}\left(1-\frac{\omega}{\omega_{c}}S\right)E_{1x}-iE_{1y}\right]\left(1-\frac{\omega^{2}_{c}}{\omega^{2}}-\Delta\right)^{-1},\\ \end{array}} \end{equation}

where $S=({\mu _{B}\eta (\alpha )k^{2}c})/{e\omega }$ is the spin correction term.

From the linearized Maxwell's equations (2.12) and (4.2), we have

(4.8)\begin{equation} (\omega^{2}-k^{2}c^{2})E_{1x}={-}4{\rm \pi} \textrm{i}\omega (J_{ey}+J_{M})(1-\chi)^{{-}1}, \end{equation}

and

(4.9)\begin{equation} \omega^{2}E_{1y}={-}4{\rm \pi} \textrm{i}\omega J_{ex}(1-\chi)^{{-}1}, \end{equation}

where $J_{ex}=-en_{0}u_{1x}$ and $J_{ey}=-en_{0}u_{1y}$ are the two components of electron current density $\boldsymbol {J}_{e}$, and $J_{M}=({\textrm {i}\mu _{B}\eta (\alpha )n_{0}k^{2}v_{1y}})/{\omega }$ is the magnitude of the spin magnetization current density.

According to (4.8) and (4.9), the dispersion equation can be obtained as

(4.10)\begin{align} \left| \begin{array}{cc} \displaystyle-\textrm{i}\left(\dfrac{\omega_{c}}{\omega}-S\right)\omega_{p}^{2} & \displaystyle\omega^{2}\left(1-\dfrac{\omega^{2}_{c}}{\omega^{2}}-\varDelta\right)(1-\chi)-\omega_{p}^{2}\\ \displaystyle(\omega^{2}-k^{2}c^{2})\left(1-\dfrac{\omega^{2}_{c}}{\omega^{2}}-\varDelta\right)(1-\chi)-\omega_{p}^{2}\left(1-\varDelta-S^{2}\right) & \displaystyle \textrm{i}\left(\dfrac{\omega_{c}}{\omega}+S\right)\omega_{p}^{2} \\ \end{array} \right|=0, \end{align}

where $\omega _{p}^{2}=4{\rm \pi} n_{0}e^{2}/m$ is the plasma frequency.

Solving (4.10), the dispersion relation of the extraordinary wave in spin quantum magnetoplasmas with the vacuum polarization effect is derived as

(4.11)\begin{equation} \frac{k^{2}c^{2}}{\omega^{2}}=1-\frac{\varOmega^{2}_{p}}{\omega^{2}} \frac{\omega^{2}(1-\varDelta-S^{2})-\varOmega_{p}^{2}}{\omega^{2}-\tilde{\omega}_{h}^{2}}, \end{equation}

where

(4.12)\begin{equation} \tilde{\omega}_{h}^{2}=\varOmega^{2}_{p}+\omega^{2}_{c}+\frac{k^{2}v^{2}_{Fe}}{3\gamma_{0}}+\frac{\hbar^{2}k^{4}}{4m^{2}} \end{equation}

is the dispersion relation of an upper-hybrid wave, and $\varOmega ^{2}_{p}=\omega _{p}^{2}/(1-\chi )$.

In the absence of quantum effects and the vacuum polarization effect we have $\varDelta =0, S=0$ and $\chi =0$, so (4.11) and (4.12) will reproduce to the dispersion relation of an extraordinary wave and the frequency of upper-hybrid oscillation in the classical cold plasmas.

5 Discussion and conclusion

Here, we adopt the typical parameters of a dense astrophysical object, such as a pulsar magnetosphere, for quantitative calculation, where the plasma parameters are chosen as $n_{0}=10^{29}\ \textrm {cm}^{-3}$, $B_{0}=10^{13\sim 14}\ \textrm {Gs}$ and $T\sim 10^{9}\ \textrm {K}$ (Harding & Lai Reference Harding and Lai2006).

It is well known that when the de Broglie wavelength $\lambda _{B}$ of electrons becomes comparable to, or even larger than, the average interparticle distance of electrons (viz., $\lambda ^{3}_{B}n_{0}\geq 1$), the quantum effects will play a crucial role in plasma dynamics. From the expression $\lambda ^{3}_{B}n_{0}\geq 1$, we have

(5.1)\begin{equation} \frac{n_{0}}{T^{3/2}}\geq 10^{16}\ \textrm{cm}^{{-}3}/{\rm K}^{3/2}. \end{equation}

Obviously, the parameters of a pulsar magnetosphere satisfy the above quantum condition. Therefore, the Bohm potential and arbitrary relativistic degeneracy pressure should be considered.

Due to the complexity of the spin dynamics, it is difficult to give simple conditions when the spin effect is important. However, a few simple rules of thumb can be given: the spin effect is important if the energy difference between the two spin states is larger than the thermal energy or Fermi energy (viz., $\mu _{B}B_{0}/K_{B}T\geq 1$ or $\mu _{B}B_{0}/K_{B}T_{Fe}\geq 1$). Calculating with the parameters of a pulsar magnetosphere we have

(5.2)\begin{equation} \mu_{B}B_{0}>K_{B}T_{Fe}>K_{B}T. \end{equation}

Obviously, the energy difference between the two spin states is larger than the Fermi energy and thermal energy in the pulsar magnetosphere, and the spin effect should also be considered.

Equations (3.7) and (4.11) indicate that the contribution of vacuum polarization to the dispersion relation of linear waves is mainly reflected in the correction of the plasma frequency with the factor of $\beta$, and figure 3 shows that $\beta$ can reach $10^{-3}$ with the super strong magnetic field $B_{0}=1.4\times 10^{14} \ \textrm {Gs}$.

Figure 3. The modification of vacuum polarization effects to the electron plasma frequency.

Figure 4 shows the dispersion relation curves of extraordinary waves in classical plasmas, quantum plasmas and spin quantum plasmas, where the plasma parameters are chosen as $n_{0}=10^{29} \ \textrm {cm}^{-3}$ and $B_{0}=10^{13} {\rm Gs}$. In figure 4(a), the three dispersion relation curves almost coincide and are indistinguishable, because the value range of the wave vector is relatively large ($k=10^{2}\sim 10^{10} \ \textrm {cm}^{-1}$). If the wave vector is restricted to the relatively high range $k\sim 10^{10} \ \textrm {cm}^{-1}$, as shown in figure 4(b), it shows that the dispersion curve of extraordinary waves is significantly modified by the quantum effects and the spin effects. Meanwhile, if the wave vector is restricted to the relatively low range $k\sim 10^{5} \ \textrm {cm}^{-1}$, as shown in figure 4(c), the dispersion curve of extraordinary waves is significantly modified by the quantum effects (Bohm potential and arbitrary relativistic degeneracy pressure), but the contribution of the spin effects is not obvious. Therefore, it can be concluded that in the low-frequency range, the correction to the dispersion relation of extraordinary waves produced by spin effects can be ignored, but in the high-frequency range, the correction is more obvious.

Figure 4. (a) The dispersion relation curves of extraordinary waves in classical plasmas, quantum plasmas and spin quantum plasmas, where the value of $k$ ranges from $10^{2}$ to $10^{11}$. (b) The dispersion relation curves with a $k$ value of approximately $10^{10}$. (c) The dispersion relation curves with $k$ value of approximately $10^{5}$. The plasma parameters: $n_{0}=10^{29} \ \textrm {cm}^{-3}$, $B_{0}=10^{13} \ \textrm {Gs}$.

In summary, we present a theoretical investigation on the propagation of extraordinary and upper-hybrid waves in spin quantum magnetoplasmas with vacuum polarization effect. Based on the quantum magnetohydrodynamics model including Bohm potential, arbitrary relativistic degeneracy pressure and spin force, and Maxwell's equations modified by the spin current and vacuum polarization current, the dispersion relations of an extraordinary wave and upper hybrid wave are derived. The analytical and numerical results show that quantum effects (Bohm potential, arbitrary relativistic degeneracy pressure and spin magnetization energy) and the vacuum polarization effect should be considered in the dense astrophysical objects, such as a pulsar magnetosphere, as they significantly modify the propagation of an extraordinary wave under certain circumstances. Under the action of a strong magnetic field, the plasma frequency is obviously increased by the vacuum polarization effect. This theoretical research may be useful for understanding the propagation properties of the high-frequency waves in dense astrophysical objects, and also provides important reference for the experimental study on the intense laser–solid density plasma interaction.

Funding

This work is supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No 11705110 and Grant No 11665009) and the Scientific and Technological Innovation Programs of Higher Education Institutions (Grant No 2016103).

Editor Roger Blandford thanks the referees for their advice in evaluating this article.

Declaration of interests

The authors report no conflict of interest.

References

REFERENCES

Andreev, P. A. 2015 Separated spin-up and spin-down quantum hydrodynamics of degenerated electrons: spin-electron acoustic wave appearance. Phys. Rev. E 91 (3), 033111.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Andreev, P. A. 2017 Extraordinary spin-electron acoustic wave. Phys. Plasmas 24 (2), 022123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bohm, D. 1952 A suggested interpretation of the quantum theory in term of hidden variables. Phys. Rev. 85 (2), 166193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brodin, G. & Marklund, M. 2007 Spin magnetohydrodynamics. New J. Phys. 9, 277.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brodin, G., Marklund, M., Eliasson, B. & Shukla, P. K. 2007 Quantum-electrodynamical photon splitting in magnetized nonlinear pair plasmas. Phys. Rev. Lett. 98 (12), 125001.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
El-Shamy, E. F. 2015 Nonlinear ion-acoustic cnoidal waves in a dense relativistic degenerate magnetoplasma. Phys. Rev. E 91 (3), 033105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gedalin, M., Merose, D. B. & Gruman, E. 1998 Long waves in a relativistic pair in a strong magnetic field. Phys. Rev. E 57 (3), 33993410.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldreich, P. & Julian, W. H. 1969 Pulsar electrodynamics. Astrophys. J. 157, 868880.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haas, F. 2011 An introduction to quantum plasmas. Braz. J. Phys. 41, 349363.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haas, F., Manfredi, G. & Feix, M. 2000 Multistream model for quantum plasmas. Phys. Rev. E 62 (2), 27632772.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Harding, A. K. & Lai, D. 2006 Physics of strongly magnetized neutron stars. Rep. Prog. Phys. 69, 26312708.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heisenberg, W. & Euler, H. 1936 Folgerungen aus der Diracschen Theorie des Positrons. Z. Phys. 98 (11), 714732.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Iqbal, Z., Ayub, M., Shah, H. A. & Murtaza, G. 2019 a Energy behavior of spin electron cyclotron wave in a spin polarized plasma. Phys. Lett. A 383, 29032907.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Iqbal, Z., Khan, I. A. & Murtaza, G. 2018 a On the upper hybrid wave instability in a spin polarized degenerate plasma. Phys. Plasmas 25, 062121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Iqbal, Z., Khanum, U. & Murtaza, G. 2018 b Lower hybrid wave instability in a spin–polarized degenerate plasma. Contrib. Plasma Phys. 59 (3), 284291.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Iqbal, Z., Younas, M., Khan, I. A. & Murtaza, G. 2019 b Spin magnetoacoustic wave. Phys. Plasmas 26, 112101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lundin, J., Stenflo, L., Brodin, G., Marklund, M. & Shukla, P. K. 2007 Circularly polarized waves in a plasma with vacuum polarization effects. Phys. Plasmas 14 (6), 064503.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Manfredi, G. 2005 How to model quantum plasmas. Fields Institute Communications 46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marklund, M. & Brodin, G. 2007 Dynamics of spin-$\frac {1}2$ quantum plasmas. Phys. Rev. Lett. 98 (2), 025001.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Marklund, M. & Shukla, P. K. 2006 Nonlinear collective effects in photon-photon and photon-plasma interactions. Rev. Mod. Phys. 78 (2), 591640.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Markowich, P. A., Ringhofer, C. & Schmeiser, C. 1990 Semiconductor Equations. Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maroof, R., Ali, S., Mushtaq, A. & Qamar, A. 2015 Magnetohydrodynamic waves with relativistic electrons and positrons in degenerate spin-1/2 astrophysical plasmas. Phys. Plasmas 22 (11), 112102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mushtaq, A., Maroof, R., Ahmad, Z. & Qamar, A. 2012 Magnetohydrodynamic spin waves in degenerate electron-positron-ion plasmas. Phys. Plasmas 19 (5), 052101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shen, B., Yu, M. Y. & Wang, X. 2003 Photon–photon scattering in a plasma channel. Phys. Plasmas 10 (11), 45704571.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shukla, P. K. 2006 A new dust mode in quantum plasmas. Phys. Lett. A 352, 242243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shukla, P. K. & Eliasson, B. 2006 Formation and dynamics of dark solitons and vortices in quantum electron plasmas. Phys. Rev. Lett. 96 (24), 245001.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shukla, P. K. & Eliasson, B. 2011 Colloquium: nonlinear collective interactions in quantum plasmas with degenerate electron fluids. Rev. Mod. Phys. 83 (3), 885906.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shukla, P. K. & Stenflo, L. 2008 Dispersion relations for electromagnetic waves in a dense magnetized plasma. J. Plasma Phys. 74 (6), 719723.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stenflo, L., Brodin, G., Marklund, M. & Shukla, P. K. 2005 A new electromagnetic wave in a pair plasma. J. Plasma Phys. 71 (5), 709713.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Figure 0

Figure 1. Cartesian coordinate system, chosen such that $\boldsymbol {B}_{0}$ is along $\hat {z}$ and $\boldsymbol {E}_{1}$ is along $\hat {y}$.

Figure 1

Figure 2. Cartesian coordinate system, chosen such that $\boldsymbol {B}_{0}$ and $\boldsymbol {B}_{1}$ are along $\hat {z}$, and $\boldsymbol {E}_{1}$ is in the plane of $xoy$.

Figure 2

Figure 3. The modification of vacuum polarization effects to the electron plasma frequency.

Figure 3

Figure 4. (a) The dispersion relation curves of extraordinary waves in classical plasmas, quantum plasmas and spin quantum plasmas, where the value of $k$ ranges from $10^{2}$ to $10^{11}$. (b) The dispersion relation curves with a $k$ value of approximately $10^{10}$. (c) The dispersion relation curves with $k$ value of approximately $10^{5}$. The plasma parameters: $n_{0}=10^{29} \ \textrm {cm}^{-3}$, $B_{0}=10^{13} \ \textrm {Gs}$.