Hostname: page-component-7b9c58cd5d-bslzr Total loading time: 0.001 Render date: 2025-03-15T09:43:58.588Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

A reinsurance risk model with a threshold coverage policy: the Gerber–Shiu penalty function

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 April 2017

Onno J. Boxma*
Affiliation:
Eindhoven University of Technology
Esther Frostig*
Affiliation:
University of Haifa
David Perry*
Affiliation:
University of Haifa Western Galilee College
*
* Postal address: Department of Mathematics and Computer Science, Eindhoven University of Technology, PO Box 513, 5600 MB Eindhoven, The Netherlands.
** Postal address: Department of Statistics, University of Haifa, Haifa, 31905, Israel.
** Postal address: Department of Statistics, University of Haifa, Haifa, 31905, Israel.
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

We consider a Cramér–Lundberg insurance risk process with the added feature of reinsurance. If an arriving claim finds the reserve below a certain threshold γ, or if it would bring the reserve below that level, then a reinsurer pays part of the claim. Using fluctuation theory and the theory of scale functions of spectrally negative Lévy processes, we derive expressions for the Laplace transform of the time to ruin and of the joint distribution of the deficit at ruin and the surplus before ruin. We specify these results in much more detail for the threshold set-up in the case of proportional reinsurance.

Type
Research Papers
Copyright
Copyright © Applied Probability Trust 2017 

References

Asmussen, S. and Albrecher, H. (2010).Ruin Probabilities, 2nd edn. (Adv. Ser. Statist. Sci. Appl. Prob. 14).World Scientific,Hackensack, NJ.Google Scholar
Boxma, O. J., Frostig, E., Perry, D. and Yosef, R. (2016).Partial coverage by a rich uncle until ruin: a reinsurance model. Res. Rep. Eurandom Vol. 2016-001.Google Scholar
Dickson, D. C. M. and Drekic, S. (2006).Optimal dividends under a ruin probability constraint.Ann. Actuar. Sci. 1,291306.Google Scholar
Gerber, H. U. and Shiu, E. S. W. (2006).On optimal dividends: from reflection to refraction.J. Comput. Appl. Math. 186,422.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kuznetsov, A., Kyprianou, A. E. and Rivero, V. (2012).The theory of scale functions for spectrally negative Lévy processes. In Lévy Matters II, (Lecture Notes Math. 2061).Springer,Heidelberg, pp.97186.Google Scholar
Kyprianou, A. E. (2006).Introductory Lectures on Fluctuations of Lévy Processes with Applications.Springer,Berlin.Google Scholar
Kyprianou, A. E. (2013).Gerber–Shiu Risk Theory.Springer,Cham.Google Scholar
Kyprianou, A. E. and Loeffen, R. L. (2010).Refracted Lévy processes.Ann. Inst. H. Poincaré. Prob. Statist. 46,2444.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lin, S. X. and Pavlova, K. P. (2006).The compound Poisson risk model with a threshold dividend strategy.Insurance Math. Econom. 38,5780.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Loeffen, R. L. (2014).On obtaining simple identities for overshoots of spectrally negative Lévy processes. Res. Rep. 12, Probability and Statistics Group, The University of Manchester. Available at https://arxiv.org/abs/1410.5341.Google Scholar
Wan, N. (2007).Dividend payments with a threshold strategy in the compound Poisson risk model perturbed by diffusion.Insurance Math. Econom. 40,509523.Google Scholar
Zhang, H. Y., Zhou, M. and Gou, J. Y. (2006).The Gerber–Shiu discounted penalty function for classical risk model with two-step premium rate.Statist. Prob. Lett. 76,12111218.Google Scholar