Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-5r2nc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-06T18:25:13.412Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Commentary on Ree, Carretta, and Teachout (2015)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 March 2016

Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

In Industrial and Organizational Psychology volume 8, issue 3, a commentary to the focal article Ree et al. was unfortunately omitted. This commentary, “I've Found It, but What Does It Mean? On the Importance of Theory in Identifying Dominant General Factors,” by Zhenyu Yuan, is reproduced in the following pages.

Type
Addendum
Information
Industrial and Organizational Psychology , Volume 9 , Issue 1 , March 2016 , pp. 211
Copyright
Copyright © Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology 2016 

In Industrial and Organizational Psychology volume 8, issue 3, a commentary to the focal article Ree et al. was unfortunately omitted. This commentary, “I've Found It, but What Does It Mean? On the Importance of Theory in Identifying Dominant General Factors,” by Zhenyu Yuan, is reproduced in the following pages.

IOP appreciates the opportunity for clarification and regrets the omission.

References

Ree, M.J., Carretta, T. R., & Teachout, M.S. (2015). Pervasiveness of dominant general factors in organizational measurement. Industrial and Organizational Psychology: Perspectives on Science and Practice, 8, 409–427.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yuan, Z. (2016). I've found it, but what does it mean? On the importance of theory in identifying dominant general factors. Industrial and Organizational Psychology: Perspectives on Science and Practice, 9, 212–216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar