Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
  1. Home
  2. Journals
  3. History of Education Quarterly
  4. Volume 39
Journal Home
Refine listing

Refine listing

Access:
Publication date:

Actions for selected content:

Select all | Deselect all
  • View selected items
  • Export citations
  • Download PDF (zip)
  • Save to Kindle
  • Save to Dropbox
  • Save to Google Drive

Save Search

You can save your searches here and later view and run them again in "My saved searches".

Please provide a title, maximum of 40 characters.
Cancel
×
< Back to all issues

Volume 39 - Spring 1999

Contents

Page 2 of 6

Book Reviews

Conversation

  • Poor Historiography: The “Poorest” in American Higher Education

  • Jana Nidiffer
  • Published online by Cambridge University Press:
    24 February 2017, pp. 321-336

  • In 1947, the President's Commission on Higher Education issued the so-called “Truman Report” which identified five significant deterrents to completing a college degree: race, gender, religion, geography, and socioeconomic background. Over fifty years later, religious affiliation, geographic origins, and gender are no longer significant barriers to degree attainment. In fact, by 1991 women comprised a majority of America's undergraduates. At the time of the Truman Report, “race” referred generally to African Americans. Although no one would argue that African-American students (as well as other disadvantaged students of color) are attending, persisting, and graduating from colleges in the numbers deemed desirable, these students are better represented now than they were at the conclusion of World War II. In 1940, for example, African Americans with a college degree represented approximately two percent of the black population, while college-educated whites comprised over seven percent of white adults. By 1995 the gap had widened to 26 percent of white adults but only 15 percent of African Americans. The Truman Report considered a family poor if it had a cash income of less than $2,350 per annum—approximately 20 percent of all United States families. It cited research showing that when student ability (as measured by standard IQ tests) was held constant, boys from the higher income group were four times more likely to attend college than boys from the lowest stratum. By the early 1990s, students from the highest income quartile were ten times more likely to earn a college degree than those from the lowest quartile. Therefore, the only group identified by the Truman Report whose odds of attending college are actually worse today is the poor, regardless of racial background. When the persistent and pernicious interrelationship of poverty and minority status within the United States is acknowledged, socioeconomic background emerges as perhaps the most salient determinate of college attendance.

Essay Review

  • Xena, Warrior Princess, or Judith, Sexual Warrior? The Search for a Liberating Image of Women's Power in Popular Culture

  • Kim Tolley
  • Published online by Cambridge University Press:
    24 February 2017, pp. 337-342
    • Article
      • You have access
    • PDF
    • Export citation

Book Reviews

Page 2 of 6