Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-d8cs5 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-06T06:53:06.483Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

U–Pb and Hf isotope study of detrital zircon and Cr-spinel in the Banavara quartzite and implications for the evolution of the Dharwar Craton, south India

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 April 2021

Bidyananda Maibam*
Affiliation:
Department of Earth Sciences, Manipur University, Canchipur, Imphal-795003, India ARC Centre of Excellence for Core to Crust Fluid Systems, Department of Earth & Environmental Sciences, Macquarie University, SydneyNSW2109, Australia
Davide Lenaz
Affiliation:
Department of Mathematics and Geosciences, University of Trieste, 34128Trieste, Italy
Stephen Foley
Affiliation:
ARC Centre of Excellence for Core to Crust Fluid Systems, Department of Earth & Environmental Sciences, Macquarie University, SydneyNSW2109, Australia
Jasper Berndt
Affiliation:
Institute of Mineralogy, Universität Münster, D-48149Münster, Germany
Elena Belousova
Affiliation:
ARC Centre of Excellence for Core to Crust Fluid Systems, Department of Earth & Environmental Sciences, Macquarie University, SydneyNSW2109, Australia
Monica Wangjam
Affiliation:
Department of Earth Sciences, Manipur University, Canchipur, Imphal-795003, India
Jitendra N. Goswami
Affiliation:
Physical Research Laboratory, Ahmedabad-380009, India
Argyrios Kapsiotis
Affiliation:
Key Laboratory of Offshore Oil Exploration and Development of Guangdong Higher Education Institutes, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Marine Resources and Coastal Engineering, School of Marine Science, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou510275, China Ayiou Mina 31, Salamina, Greece (PC: 18900)
*
Author for correspondence: Bidyananda Maibam, Email: bmaibam@yahoo.com
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The Sargur Group has been considered to be the oldest group (>3.0 Ga) in the Archaean sequence of the Dharwar Craton in south India, whereas the rocks of the Dharwar Supergroup are younger (between 3.0 and 2.55 Ga). The supracrustal units of the Sargur Group were deposited during the Archaean period. The Banavara quartzite forms part of the supracrustal Sargur Group and contains significant amounts of chromian spinel (Cr-spinel). Here, U–Pb and Hf isotopes of detrital zircons are integrated with compositional data and X-ray refinement parameters for Cr-spinels to decipher the provenance of the metasediments. Zircons show an age spectrum from 3.15 to 2.50 Ga, and juvenile Hf isotopic compositions (ϵHf = +0.8 to +6.4) with model ages between 3.3 and 3.0 Ga. Major- and trace-element contents of the Cr-spinels do not resemble those in the Sargur ultramafic rocks, but resemble well-characterized Archaean anorthosite-hosted chromites. Cr-spinel trace-element signatures indicate that they have undergone secondary alteration or metamorphism. X-ray refinement parameters for the Cr-spinels also resemble the anorthosite-hosted chromites. We conclude that the detrital minerals were probably derived from gneissic and anorthositic rocks of the Western Dharwar Craton, and that the Sargur Group sequences have experienced a younger (2.5 Ga) metamorphic overprint.

Type
Original Article
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press

1. Introduction

Knowledge of the provenance of ancient clastic sedimentary rocks is important for mineral exploration and basin analysis, as well as for palaeotectonic reconstructions. Minor amounts of heavy minerals such as zircon, rutile, tourmaline, garnet, epidote and chromian spinel (Cr-spinel) are commonly contained in clastic sedimentary rocks. Geochemical and heavy mineral associations of specific detrital minerals are powerful tools in provenance characterization, especially in deciphering the timing of erosion or the tectonic setting of source terrains. Major- and trace-element and isotopic signatures of most of the heavy minerals mentioned above have been used as provenance indicators (e.g. Pober & Faupl, Reference Pober and Faupl1988; Morton, Reference Morton, Morton, Todd and Haughton1991; von Eynatten & Gaupp, Reference von Eynatten and Gaupp1999; Sircombe, Reference Sircombe1999; Faupl et al. Reference Faupl, Petrakakis, Migiros and Pavlopoulos2002; Spiegel et al. Reference Spiegel, Siebel and Frisch2002).

Archaean cratons preserve a record of crustal evolution processes of the primordial Earth, and metasediments of the Archaean provinces preserve remnants of the crust that are no longer exposed on the Earth’s crust. However, such rocks have experienced protracted metamorphic-deformational-alteration events making it difficult to understand the evolution of the early continental areas. Resistant minerals such as zircon, rutile, chromite, etc. associated with the Archaean metasediments are ideal materials as the isotopic and geochemical tracers incorporated in these phases can survive multiple geological processes. Detrital zircon from Archaean metasediments has been used to delineate the regional and geochronological history of such provinces (e.g. Gerdes & Zeh, Reference Gerdes and Zeh2006; Zeh & Gerdes, Reference Zeh and Gerdes2012; Maibam et al. Reference Maibam, Gerdes and Goswami2016). During the past decade, numerous U–Pb dating studies have been conducted on granitoid rocks of the Dharwar Craton using modern microbeam techniques (ion probe and laser ablation multi-collector/quadrupole inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (LA-MC/Q-ICP-MS)). Although isotopic age datasets have outlined the geochronological framework of the formation and evolution of the Archaean gneissic continental crust of the Dharwar Craton (Maibam et al. Reference Maibam, Goswami and Srinivasan2011, Reference Maibam, Gerdes and Goswami2016, Reference Maibam, Gerdes, Srinivasan and Goswami2017; Lancaster et al. Reference Lancaster, Dey, Storey, Mitra and Bhunia2015; Guitreau et al. Reference Guitreau, Mukasa, Loudin and Krishnan2017), the provenance study of metasediments of the Archaean supracrustal units is lacking.

Combined in situ U–Pb and Hf isotopic studies of zircon are ideal for providing provenance information and for giving insight into regional crustal growth, providing an overview of magmatism/metamorphism of igneous/metamorphic rocks of different ages over a large area (e.g. Cawood et al. Reference Cawood, Nemchin, Leverenz, Saeed and Ballance1999, Reference Cawood, Hawkesworth and Dhuime2012; Wang et al. Reference Wang, Zhou, Yan, Li and Malpas2013). The Hf isotope composition of zircons is a sensitive tracer for sediment provenance (Kinny & Maas, Reference Kinny and Maas2003; Howard et al. Reference Howard, Hand, Barovich, Reid, Wade and Belousova2009) and is not usually affected by post-crystallization thermal disturbance, so it provides an accurate record of whether the zircons formed during juvenile additions to the crust or are derived from reworked crust, or a combination of the two. The age spectra of the grains and the Hf isotope composition allow comparison with the geochemical characteristics of potential source terrains.

Cr-spinel is a common mineral in mafic and ultramafic rocks, and its chemical composition is influenced by the geodynamic environment of its formation, enabling its use as a petrogenetic indicator (e.g. Irvine, Reference Irvine1967; Dick & Bullen, Reference Dick and Bullen1984; Allan et al. Reference Allan, Sack and Batiza1988; Sack & Ghiorso, Reference Sack and Ghiorso1991; Roeder, Reference Roeder1994; Barnes & Roeder, Reference Barnes and Roeder2001; Zhu et al. Reference Zhu, Kidd, Rowley, Brian and Currie2004). Although the composition of Cr-spinel depends on the geotectonic setting, it is also strongly dependent on processes that occur within a single geotectonic regime. Cr-spinel also occurs as a detrital component in sedimentary rocks, in which the chemical durability and varied geochemical fingerprints of the spinel reflect the origin of the parent rock and allow the identification of a specific provenance. Cr-spinel is mechanically stable, preserves its compositional signature against weathering and diagenesis (Mange & Morton, Reference Mange, Morton, Mange and Wright2007) and is easy to recognize in both transmitted and reflected light (Cookenboo et al. Reference Cookenboo, Bustin and Wilks1997), enabling its widespread use in provenance studies and palaeotectonic reconstruction (Utter, Reference Utter1978; Press, Reference Press1986; Pober & Faupl, Reference Pober and Faupl1988; Arai & Okada, Reference Arai and Okada1991; Cookenboo et al. Reference Cookenboo, Bustin and Wilks1997; Sciunnach & Garzanti, Reference Sciunnach and Garzanti1997; Lenaz et al. Reference Lenaz, Kamenetsky, Crawford and Princivalle2000, Reference Lenaz, Kamenetsky and Princivalle2003, Reference Lenaz, Mazzoli, Spišiak, Princivalle and Maritan2009 b).

In this study, we present U–Pb and Hf isotope datasets for detrital zircons and a geochemical and crystal chemical study of detrital Cr-spinels from the Banavara quartzite, which forms part of the Sargur Group, a supracrustal unit of the Dharwar Craton. We use this data to decipher the probable provenance of the sediments and the tectono-magmatic evolution of the Dharwar Craton.

2. Geological background

2.a. Geological setting of the area

The Dharwar Craton comprises vast areas of tonalitic–trondhjemitic–granodioritic (TTG) gneisses (3.36–2.7 Ga, regionally known as Peninsular Gneisses) and two generations of volcanic–sedimentary greenstone sequences (>3.0 Ga Sargur Group and 2.9–2.6 Ga Dharwar Supergroup). The craton is sub-divided into two parts viz. the Western Dharwar Craton (WDC) and the Eastern Dharwar Craton (EDC) based on the nature and abundance of greenstones as well as the age of their surrounding basement and degree of regional metamorphism (Swami Nath et al. Reference Swami Nath, Ramakrishnan and Viswanatha1976). Maibam et al. (Reference Maibam, Goswami and Srinivasan2011) showed widespread occurrence of Archaean (>3.0 Ga) crustal components in the EDC that suggests that crust formation in both the WDC and EDC took place during Mesoarchaean time (>3.3 Ga) and continued until 2.5 Ga.

The Meso- to Neoarchaean lithostratigraphic sequence of the Dharwar Craton, southern India, consists of the Sargur Group and the Dharwar Supergroup (Swami Nath & Ramakrishnan, Reference Swami Nath and Ramakrishnan1981). The supracrustal rocks of the Sargur Group comprise a range of metasedimentary rocks: fuchsite and muscovite quartzites ± graphite, psammopelites (kyanite/sillimanite ± garnet ± graphite schists), calc-silicate rocks and marbles, and banded iron formation (BIF). They are associated with metamorphosed ultramafic rocks (some komatiite), gabbros and anorthosites (Viswanatha & Ramakrishnan, Reference Viswanatha, Ramakrishnan, Swami Nath and Ramakrishnan1981). Ramakrishnan (Reference Ramakrishnan2009) divided the Sargur Group into two types of lithological associations (i) linear ultramafic-mafic belts containing subordinate clastic sediments and BIF (e.g. Nuggihalli, Nagamangala and Krishnarajpet) and (ii) scattered ultramafic-mafic enclaves associated with a quartzite–carbonate–pelite–BIF assemblage (e.g. Sargur and Mercara). On the basis of the first U–Pb SHRIMP data for detrital zircons from quartzites of the Sargur Group near Holenarasipur and Banavara, Nutman et al. (Reference Nutman, Chadwick, Ramakrishnan and Viswanathan1992) suggested that the sedimentary protoliths of the quartzite were derived from 3.58–3.13 Ga granitoid rocks and attributed a younger population of 3.13–2.9 Ga to the effects of high-grade metamorphism associated with the emplacement of the Peninsular Gneiss. Lancaster et al. (Reference Lancaster, Dey, Storey, Mitra and Bhunia2015) also showed that the Sargur Group metasediments were supplied by a 3580–3130 Ma provenance. Jayananda et al. (Reference Jayananda, Kano, Peucat and Channabasappa2008) and Maya et al. (Reference Maya, Bhutani, Balakrishnan and Rajee Sandhya2017) reported 3.35 and 3.15 Ga ages for komatiitic rocks of the Sargur Group. Pb−Pb zircon and Rb−Sr whole-rock ages for gneisses from the Gorur–Hassan area (Naha et al. Reference Naha, Srinivasan, Gopalan, Pantulu, Subba Rao, Vrevsky and Bogomolov1993; Peucat et al. Reference Peucat, Mahabaleshwar and Jayananda1993) are generally higher, in the range 3300 to 3100 Ma (3.3−3.1 Ga). An overprint of a secondary event at ~2900−2800 Ma (2.9−2.8 Ga) has been inferred from zircon data for both gneisses and metasediments of the adjoining Nuggihalli schist belt (Maibam et al. Reference Maibam, Deomurari and Goswami2003).

Radhakrishna (Reference Radhakrishna, Naqvi and Rogers1983) suggested the Sargur supracrustal rocks were sediments deposited in volcanically active shallow basins. The clastic metasediments (quartzites) are characterized by cross-bedding. Ramiengar et al. (Reference Ramiengar, Devadu, Viswanatha, Chayapathi and Ramakrishnan1978) suggested a detrital nature for the quartzite on the basis of the presence of current-bedding in some of the quartzites. Based on the cross-bedding, palaeocurrent and other sedimentary evidence, Naha et al. (Reference Naha, Srinivasan and Jayaram1991) suggested a fluvial origin for the quartzites.

The division of the Dharwar supracrustal sequence into the Sargur Group (older than 3.0 Ga) and Dharwar Supergroup (3.0–2.55 Ga) contradicts an alternative view that the Sargur Group rocks correspond to rocks of the Dharwar Supergroup together with some older rocks (Ramakrishnan, Reference Ramakrishnan, Ravindra and Ranganathan1994; Srinivasan & Naha, Reference Srinivasan, Naha and Saha1996). The Sargur Group has been considered to be the oldest group in the Archaean sequence of the Dharwar Craton (Ramakrishnan & Vaidyanathan, Reference Ramakrishnan and Vaidyanathan2008) and is assigned an age older than 3.0 Ga, whereas the rocks of the Dharwar Supergroup, consisting of the Dharwar greenstone belts, are younger and were deposited between 3.0 and 2.55 Ga.

The Dharwar greenstone belt rocks are metamorphosed at greenschist to lower amphibolite facies, whereas the Sargur Group was metamorphosed under upper amphibolite to lower granulite facies (e.g. Viswanatha & Ramakrishnan, Reference Viswanatha, Ramakrishnan, Swami Nath and Ramakrishnan1981). Among the major mafic-ultramafic bodies are Holenarasipur, Nuggihalli, Krishnarajpet and Jayachamarajapura. In the Nuggihalli schist belt komatiite affinity chromite seams occur as layers, irregular tabular or lensoid bodies in serpentinized ultramafic rocks (Bidyananda & Mitra, Reference Bidyananda and Mitra2005). Combined single crystal X-ray refinement and Mössbauer spectroscopy study show that the Nuggihalli chromites were not affected by metamorphism (Lenaz et al. Reference Lenaz, Andreozzi, Mitra, Bidyananda and Princivalle2004).

Ramakrishnan (Reference Ramakrishnan2009) and Chadwick et al. (Reference Chadwick, Ramakrishnan, Vasudev and Viswanatha1989) suggested that the Dharwar Supergroup consists of three lithological packages: (1) the Bababudan Group comprising quartz-pebble conglomerate, amygdular metabasalt alternations, felsic volcanic rocks and BIF; (2) the Chitradurga Group classified into (a) the Vanivilas Subgroup, including polymict conglomerate, quartzite, pelite, carbonate and manganese-iron formations, and (b) the Ingaldhal Subgroup, comprising pillowed metabasalts, felsic volcanic rocks and BIF; and (3) the Ranibennur Subgroup composed of greywacke turbidite, polymict conglomerate and a BIF horizon. A generalized stratigraphical sequence of the Dharwar Craton is presented in online Supplementary Material Table S1.

The supracrustal enclave near the Banavara area is ~10 km2. The lithounit comprises fuchsite quartzite, metapelite, ironstone and ultramafic rocks. Varieties of porphyry granites (grey to pink colour) cross-cut the supracrustal units. Younger dolerite dykes cross-cut the rock units. Although primary sedimentary features, cross-bedding, etc. are reported from other metasedimentary units of the Sargur Group, the studied sample does not show any such features, probably owing to intense deformational and metamorphic recrystallization (Ramiengar et al. Reference Ramiengar, Devadu, Viswanatha, Chayapathi and Ramakrishnan1978).

2.b. Sample description

Clastic metasediments are an indispensable rock unit of the Sargur Group. However, Cr-spinels are associated with select quartzite exposures. We have deliberately sampled the Cr-spinel-bearing layered fuchsite quartzite to carry out a combined detrital zircon and Cr-spinel provenance study. The studied sample was collected from the Bangaluru–Honnavara Highway near Banavara (13° 25.322′ N, 76° 09.085′ E; Fig. 1). The chromite-bearing fuchsitic quartzites are 2 to 3 m thick and are intercalated with amphibolites, ultramafic rocks and schistose rocks. The supracrustal rocks occur as enclaves within the Peninsular Gneiss. Cr-spinel makes up 5 to 15 % of the studied sample. Representative photomicrographs of the studied sample are presented in Figure 2 and a scan image of the thin-section presented in Figure 3a.

Fig. 1. (a) Geological map of the Dharwar Craton (modified from Peucat et al. Reference Peucat, Mahabaleshwar and Jayananda1993). (b) Geological map of the Banavara area (after Ramiengar et al. Reference Ramiengar, Devadu, Viswanatha, Chayapathi and Ramakrishnan1978). Locations of important cities, towns and sample are marked.

Fig. 2. Photomicrographs of studied quartzite all in crossed nicols (except a). (a, b) Parallel alignment of quartz, Cr-spinel and fuchsite mica. Note the distribution of Cr-spinels and fuchsite arranged in subparallel alignment showing a distinct foliation. Interstices are filled with finer quartz grains. (c) Rutile needles as inclusion in quartz. (d) Tourmaline, sub-rounded zircon and fuchsite mica as inclusion in quartz.

Fig. 3. (a) Quartzite thin-section showing Cr-spinel (Chr) distribution in the sample. (b) Photomicrograph of a quartz inclusion in a Cr-spinel (Chr) grain. (c) Exsolved ilmenite (Ilm) phases in Cr-spinel (Chr). (d) Scanning electron microscope image of single Cr-spinel grain. (e) Ti distribution in the same Cr-spinel grain showing exsolution pattern.

The quartzite consists dominantly of medium- to coarse-grained (~1 mm) sub-rounded quartz grains; small quartz grains exhibit polygonal outlines and surround the larger grains. The rock shows deformation bands in places and the Cr-spinels are aligned parallel to the foliation (Fig. 2). Individual Cr-spinel grains are mostly 0.2–0.6 mm in size and anhedral in shape. Fuchsite mica (~10 % modal composition) with feeble (slight) pleochroism creates a subparallel arrangement and forms a foliation plane (Fig. 2a, b). Needle-shaped rutile, subhedral reddish tourmaline and sub-rounded zircon grains are also observed (Fig. 2c, d).

3. Methodology

3.a. Zircon

Zircon separation was carried out at the Physical Research Laboratory, Ahmedabad. The sample was crushed into centimetre-sized chips to eliminate weathered portions and thoroughly washed. Clean chips from the sample were pulverized to <250 μm using a stainless steel piston and cylinder. Zircons were concentrated using aqueous sodium polytungstate solution (density = 3 gcm−3) followed by magnetic separation using a Frantz isodynamic separator. Zircon grains were handpicked from the least magnetic fraction using a binocular microscope.

Most of the zircon U–Pb isotope analyses were carried out at the University of Münster, Germany, with an Element 2 mass spectrometer (ThermoFisher) connected to a Photon Machines Analyte G2 laser system. Forward power was 1300 W and reflected power <1 W; gas flow rates were 1.2 l m−1 for He (carrier gas of ablated material), and 0.9 l m−1 and 1.1 l m−1 for the Ar-auxiliary and sample gas, respectively. Cooling gas flow rate was set to 16 l min−1. The laser repetition rate was set to 10 Hz using a fluence of 4 J cm−2 and the system was tuned (torch position, lenses, gas flows) on NIST 612 glass, measuring 139La, 232Th and 232Th16O to get stable signals, high sensitivity and low oxide rates (232Th16O/232Th <0.1 %) during ablation. Laser spot sizes varied between 25 and 45 μm, depending on the size of the zircons. Details of the analytical and data reduction protocols can be found in Kooijman et al. (Reference Kooijman, Berndt and Mezger2012). Cathodoluminescence (CL) images of zircons were used as guides for laser ablation spot selection.

Some of the zircons were U–Pb dated by laser ablation inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (LA-ICP-MS) at MQ Geoanalytical, Macquarie University, Sydney. The analyses were carried out using an Agilent 7700 quadrupole ICP-MS instrument, attached to a Photon Machines Excimer 193 nm laser system using a beam diameter of c. 30–40 μm with 5 Hz repetition rate and energy of c. 0.06 µJ and 8 J cm−2. The analytical procedures for U–Pb dating are described in detail by Jackson et al. (Reference Jackson, Pearson, Griffin and Belousova2004).

Hf isotope analyses were carried out at MQ Geoanalytical, Macquarie University, using the methodology and analytical conditions for Lu–Hf isotope analysis described in Griffin et al. (Reference Griffin, Pearson, Belousova, Jackson, van Achterbergh, O’Reilly and Shee2000). Analyses were carried out in situ using a Photon Machines Excimer 193 nm laser attached to a Nu Plasma multi-collector ICP-MS. The analyses were carried out with a beam diameter of 40 µm and a 5 Hz repetition rate and typical ablation times of c. 100 s. He carrier gas transported the ablated sample from the cell via a mixing chamber to the ICP-MS torch.

3.b. Chromian spinels

Three Cr-spinels from the quartzite were studied by X-ray single crystal diffraction. Data were recorded on an automated KUMA-KM4 (K-geometry) diffractometer at the Department of Mathematics and Geosciences (University of Trieste), using MoKα radiation, monochromatized by a flat graphite crystal. X-ray data collection, chemical analyses and cation distribution were made according to the procedures described in Lenaz & Schmitz (Reference Lenaz and Schmitz2017).

Major-element compositions were determined with a JEOL JXA 8900 RL electron microprobe at the University of Mainz. The oxide minerals were measured with five wavelength-dispersive spectrometers at 20 kV acceleration voltage, a current of 12 or 20 nA and either a focused beam or a beam diameter of 2 µm. Natural minerals and oxides (Si, Ti, Al, Fe, Mg, Mn, Cr and Zn) and pure element standards (V, Co) were used.

Trace-element compositions of chromite were determined using a NewWave UP 266 laser system connected to an Agilent 7700cs ICP-MS at MQ Geoanalytical, Macquarie University, following the methods described by Colás et al. (Reference Colás, González-Jiménez, Griffin, Fanlo, Gervilla, O’Reilly, Pearson, Kerestedjian and Proenza2014). The basaltic glass BCR-2g and the in-house chromite secondary standard LCR-1 (Lace mine, South Africa; Locmelis et al. Reference Locmelis, Pearson, Barnes and Fiorentini2011) were analysed as unknowns during each analytical run to check accuracy and precision. The results obtained for these two standards display very good reproducibility (3–8 %) for most trace elements.

4. Results

4.a. Zircon

The majority of the zircons are long prismatic and poorly sorted, although a small number of sub-rounded to subhedral and poorly sorted zircons also occur. Grain morphology shows that the zircons could be of mixed origin (probably both detrital and metamorphic). Zircons are generally colourless to brownish in transmitted light: most of the zircon grains selected for analysis were colourless and prismatic, a few slightly rounded. They were free of visible alteration, cracks and inclusions. CL images of representative analysed grains are shown in online Supplementary Material Figure S1. CL reveals clear core–rim relationships in some zircon grains (online Supplementary Material Fig. S1vi, ix, xi). Some grains show metamict cores.

We conducted 52 analyses on 51 separate grains (online Supplementary Material Table S2a, b). Analyses with >10 % discordance occur but are not used in the discussion. Only 27 analyses yielded concordant ages (92–102 % concordance) ranging between 3150 and 2510 Ma, with a dominant age group between 3150 and 2900 Ma. It may be noted that though the total number of analysed zircons is limited, the majority of our age spectrum falls within the reported detrital zircon ages of the Sargur supracrustal sequences (except <2.9 Ga ages). The discordant (37 to 87 % concordance) dataset of 25 spot analyses yields a similar 207Pb–206Pb age range of 3150 to 2900 Ma. The U–Pb dataset is presented in online Supplementary Material Table S2 and the concordia and probability distribution diagrams in Figure 4. The older age population (3150 to 2900 Ma) showing higher uranium contents ranging between 126 and 452 ppm is similar to the youngest age range of detrital zircons in the Sargur supracrustal rocks reported by Nutman et al. (Reference Nutman, Chadwick, Ramakrishnan and Viswanathan1992). The younger age population between 2.65 and 2.51 Ga is characterized by a lower uranium (11 to 26 ppm) concentration and very low Th/U values (ranging between 0 and 0.01) (online Supplementary Material Table S2b nos. 2–6).

Fig. 4. (a) Histogram and (b) Concordia diagram for the Banavara detrital zircons showing bimodal age distribution.

A total of 18 Lu–Hf analyses were made on zircons with robust U–Pb ages (>95 % concordance). The Hf isotope compositions of the 3.15 to 2.9 Ga zircons have chondritic to superchondritic ϵHf values ranging between +0.8 and +6.4, and show variable crustal model (TDM c) ages lying between 3.1 and 3.3 Ga. The Hf isotope results are shown in Figure 5 and the data are presented in online Supplementary Material Table S3. Five data points plot above the depleted mantle (DM) line, probably owing to the mismatching of the analysed U–Pb and Hf isotope spots: these data points are not considered during the discussion. There could be at least two explanations for the data points that plot above the DM reference line: (a) In the present study, we used the model by Griffin et al. (Reference Griffin, Pearson, Belousova, Jackson, van Achterbergh, O’Reilly and Shee2000), where the DM has a present-day 176Hf/177Hf of 0.28323, similar to that of average mid-ocean ridge basalt (MORB). However, the range of MORB Hf isotope ratios is not limited to a thin line, but represents a range in 176Hf/177Hf values varying mainly from 0.283040 to 0.283311, but with some values over 0.283355 (e.g. Nowell et al. Reference Nowell, Kempton, Noble, Fitton, Saunders, Mahoney and Taylor1998). (b) There could be a possibility of core–rim zoning in some of the studied zircons, where Hf isotope analysis spots sample the older core domain, while U–Pb spots are within the younger rim zones.

Fig. 5. Plot of ϵHf versus U–Pb ages for the analysed zircons. CHUR – chondritic reservoir (bulk earth); DM – depleted mantle. Data points above the DM line are not considered during the discussion.

4.b. Chromian spinels

Detrital Cr-spinels of varying sizes often occur as continuous bands composed of >80 vol. % chromite within the metasediment. Representative photomicrographs and scanning electron microscope (SEM) images of single grains are shown in Figure 3. Individual Cr-spinel grains are mostly 0.2–2.0 mm across, anhedral and show the effects of corrosion or reaction. Cr-spinel grains are closely packed, with very narrow interstices filled with silicate minerals (Fig. 3b). Exsolved needle-shaped ilmenites a few microns in size are present in some grains (Fig. 3c, e).

Electron probe microanalysis (EPMA) of cores of Banavara Cr-spinels is presented in online Supplementary Material Table S4. The Cr-spinels show relatively variable Cr2O3 contents (30.79 to 37.61 wt %), Al2O3 in the range 20.01 to 25.74 wt %, high FeO (36.77 to 38.61 wt %) and very low MgO (0.53 to 0.91 wt %). TiO2 is less than 1 wt % (except one with 3.37 wt %) and ZnO is high (3.07–3.79 wt %). Other oxides are below 1 wt %, with MnO within 0.85–0.99 wt %, NiO 0.01–0.06 wt % and V2O3 0.16–0.23 wt %. Fe2+ and Fe3+ are calculated from ideal spinel stoichiometry: Fe2+/Fe3+ ranges between 3.3 and 10.2. Given this, the Mg no. value (Mg/(Mg + Fe2+)) is between 0.03 and 0.05, the Cr no. (Cr/(Cr + Al)) between 0.43 and 0.57, and Fe3+ no. (Fe3+/(Fe3+ + Cr + Al)) between 0.05 and 0.13.

For provenance analysis, eight transition metals (Sc, Ti, V, Mn, Co, Ni, Zn and Ga) were consistently above detection limits (DL 0.02 to 1 ppm; online Supplementary Material Table S4). Scandium contents are very low (0.19 to 0.52 ppm), Ti ranges from 1097 to 6122 ppm, V from 1057 to 1316 ppm, Mn from 5891 to 7469 ppm, Co from 313 to 422 ppm, and Ni from 190 to 234 ppm. Zinc content is very high (28961 to 38164 ppm) and Ga varies from 201 to 288 ppm. The low Mg no. and the overall enrichment of Zn, Ga, Mn and V in the Cr-spinels indicates that the enrichment is linked to secondary processes. A MORB-normalized multi-element diagram of the studied Cr-spinel is presented in Figure 6.

Fig. 6. Comparative plot of major and trace elements in Banavara (this study) and Nuggihalli Cr-spinel showing strongly differing distribution of the elements.

In spinel, anions form a nearly cubic close-packed array, parallel to (111) planes, and the cations fill part of the tetrahedral (T) and octahedral (M) interstices available in the framework. In this structure, oxygen atoms are linked to three octahedral cations and one tetrahedral cation lying on the opposite side of the oxygen layer to form a trigonal pyramid. As the oxygen atom moves along the cube diagonal [111], it causes the oxygen layers in the spinel structure to be slightly puckered. Variations in u, the oxygen positional parameter, correspond to displacements of oxygens along the cube diagonal, and reflect adjustments to the relative effective radii of cations in the tetrahedral and octahedral sites. An increase in u corresponds to an enlargement of the tetrahedral coordination polyhedra and a compensating decrease in the octahedra (Lindsley, Reference Lindsley and Rumble1976). X-ray data showed that the three crystals are very similar, with cell edges ranging from 8.2735 (3) Å to 8.2785 (2) Å and oxygen positional parameters between 0.2635 (2) and 0.2639 (2).

SEM images indicate the presence of negative crystals (Laemmlein, Reference Laemmlein1973; Kern, Reference Kern and Sunagawa1987; Sunagawa, Reference Sunagawa and Sunagawa1987) in the cores of chromite grains (Fig. 7). These octahedral pores are occasionally filled by quartz and are considered to be sites where fluid inclusions could have existed. After originally forming their primary, more or less irregular shape, fluid inclusions usually transform it through dissolution and recrystallization into the equilibrium crystal shape with minimum surface free energy. Some inclusions retain their original metastable shape, especially at low T, fast cooling and as a result of the slow recrystallization rate.

Fig. 7. SEM images of Cr-spinels: (a) polished crystal with pores; (b) map of Si distribution in the crystal; (c) broken crystal surface showing the presence of pores; (d) enlargement of octahedral pores.

5. Discussion

5.a. Zircon

Multiple age peaks on a relative probability diagram indicate input either from source regions with discrete ages or the presence of rocks of diverse ages within the source region. In the present study, grains of Archaean age are dominant, and the age range of 3150 to 2510 Ma is similar to the ages of the Peninsular Gneiss (e.g. Bhaskar Rao et al. Reference Bhaskar Rao, Beck, Rama Murthy, Nirmal Charan, Naqvi, Naqvi and Rogers1983; Rogers & Callahan, Reference Rogers and Callahan1989; Maibam et al. Reference Maibam, Deomurari and Goswami2003). Hf isotope compositions of the 3.1 to 2.9 Ga zircons are chondritic to superchondritic (ϵHf ranging between +0.8 and +6.4) and juvenile in nature, which differs from younger zircons (<2.9 Ga) with subchondritic Hf isotopes. Our results and younger ages from the Sargur Group rocks (Hokada et al. Reference Hokada, Horie, Satish-Kumar, Ueno, Nasheeth, Mishima and Shiraishi2013; Maibam et al. Reference Maibam, Gerdes, Srinivasan and Goswami2017) indicate that the Sargur Group supracrustal rocks were not derived from >3 Ga crust.

In closure proximity to the study area the zircon ages that cluster around 3.0 Ga are older than the metamorphic age of the adjoining Chennarayapatna gneiss (Bhaskar Rao et al. Reference Bhaskar Rao, Beck, Rama Murthy, Nirmal Charan, Naqvi, Naqvi and Rogers1983), but overlap with the age of the Tiptur trondhjemite (Rogers & Callahan, Reference Rogers and Callahan1989). The zircon ages for the metasediment obtained here suggest an upper limit of 3.2 Ga for the onset of sediment deposition in this part of the Dharwar Craton. The ages of some metasedimentary protoliths and the gneissic precursors in this region appear to be nearly contemporaneous. There are also reports of younger ages from the WDC: Jayananda et al. (Reference Jayananda, Chardon, Peucat and Capdevila2006) proposed regional partial reworking of the WDC at 2.6 Ga involving a high-temperature thickening event. Sarma et al. (Reference Sarma, McNaughton, Belusova, Ram Mohan and Fletcher2012) reported a similar age of 2.61−2.55 Ga with a large variation in 176Hf/177Hf ratios, probably owing to mixing between the older crustal components and mantle-derived juvenile magmas. Published detrital zircon ages and our present dataset show that the detrital zircon ages of the WDC range between 3.6 and 2.5 Ga, with some of the earlier workers inferring that the youngest age gives the maximum age of deposition (e.g. Sarma et al. Reference Sarma, McNaughton, Belusova, Ram Mohan and Fletcher2012). The studied sample is present as a supracrustal enclave enclosed within the surrounding gneisses; however, the detrital zircons are contemporaneous with the gneissic ages. We suggest from our data that the supracrustal rocks of the WDC were probably derived from the gneissic rocks of the Dharwar Craton. The combined geochronological data and current detrital zircon ages reinforce our earlier interpretation that not all Sargur supracrustal rocks were derived from >3.0 Ga crust (Maibam et al. Reference Maibam, Gerdes, Srinivasan and Goswami2017), which contrasts with the commonly accepted 3.4 to 3.0 Ga age range for the Sargur Group (e.g. Naqvi & Rogers, Reference Naqvi and Rogers1987; Jayananda et al. Reference Jayananda, Kano, Peucat and Channabasappa2008, Reference Jayananda, Chardon, Peucat, Tushipokla and Fanning2015).

The U–Pb and Hf isotope data for the Sargur supracrustal rocks are characterized by a chondritic to superchondritic crustal signature (ϵHf +0.2 to +6.4), indicating possible derivation from a juvenile magmatic crustal source with an age between 3.1 and 2.9 Ga. Our data do not support the idea that <3.2 Ga components in the western Dharwar block are recycled older crust and not juvenile in nature (Guitreau et al. Reference Guitreau, Mukasa, Loudin and Krishnan2017).

The new dataset reinforces the interpretation that the Sargur Group supracrustal enclaves are a combination of older (>3.0 Ga) and younger (<3.0 Ga) components (Maibam et al. Reference Maibam, Gerdes, Srinivasan and Goswami2017). Not all enclaves in the gneiss terrain are older than those in the greenstone belt. Evidence of younger Neoarchaean geological events (magmatic and metamorphic) at 2.6–2.5 Ga is now widespread in the supracrustal sequence (Jayananda et al. Reference Jayananda, Chardon, Peucat and Capdevila2006; Maibam et al. Reference Maibam, Goswami and Srinivasan2011; Lancaster et al. Reference Lancaster, Dey, Storey, Mitra and Bhunia2015). Our combined U−Pb and Hf isotope dataset indicates that those between 3.1 and 2.9 Ga crystallized from a juvenile magmatic source, contrasting with Nutman et al.’s (Reference Nutman, Chadwick, Ramakrishnan and Viswanathan1992) conclusion of a metamorphic origin for the 3.13–2.96 Ga detrital zircons and the restriction of juvenile magmatic zircons to the >3.3 Ga components (Guitreau et al. Reference Guitreau, Mukasa, Loudin and Krishnan2017). A span of protracted crystallization ages ranging from 3.3 to 3.0 Ga is reported from the gneissic protolith (e.g. Maibam et al. Reference Maibam, Goswami and Srinivasan2011, Reference Maibam, Gerdes and Goswami2016; Guitreau et al. Reference Guitreau, Mukasa, Loudin and Krishnan2017). The younger zircon population (2.6 to 2.5 Ga) could be of metamorphic origin or the imprint of the younger potassic granite magmatism. The results obtained in this study indicate that the 3.1 to 2.9 Ga juvenile detrital zircons in the Banavara quartzite (Sargur Group) were probably subjected to reported Neoarchaean potassic granite magmatic and metamorphic events at 2.6 and ˜2.5 Ga, an event that has been recognized from a Pb–Pb isotopic study of marbles from the Sargur Group (Sarangi et al. Reference Sarangi, Gopalan and Srinivasan2007) and Dharwar Supergroup (Russell et al. Reference Russell, Chadwick, Krishna Rao and Vasudev1996). Our zircon data do not support Hokada et al.’s (Reference Hokada, Horie, Satish-Kumar, Ueno, Nasheeth, Mishima and Shiraishi2013) interpretation that Sargur Group metamorphism (3.08 Ga) is older than the Dharwar Supergroup.

Our limited new geochronological results emphasize the need for further intensive U–Pb geochronology and Lu–Hf systematic studies of zircons in the Sargur Group supracrustal rocks in order to resolve the complex stratigraphic relationships of this group relative to the low-grade supracrustal rocks in the Dharwar greenstone belts. The current data endorse the interpretation by Maibam et al. (Reference Maibam, Gerdes, Srinivasan and Goswami2017) that the Sargur Group is a complex of rocks of more than one age, some pre-dating the Dharwar Supergroup and others of the same age as the Dharwar Supergroup.

5.b. Chromian spinels

The low Mg no. values of the Cr-spinels are a consequence of extensive alteration removing MgO, so that it is impossible to determine their primary composition and consequently their provenance. Several factors can affect the composition of spinel, from reaction with interstitial liquids at the magmatic stage, to subsolidus re-equilibration with olivine, pyroxenes or amphibole, oxidation, hydrothermal alteration and metamorphic reactions (Abzalov, Reference Abzalov1998; Appel et al. Reference Appel, Appel and Rollinson2002; Mellini et al. Reference Mellini, Rumori and Viti2005; González-Jiménez et al. Reference González-Jiménez, Kerestedjian, Proenza and Gervilla2009, Reference González-Jiménez, Locmelis, Belousova, Griffin, Gervilla, Kerestedjian, O’Reilly, Pearson and Sergeeva2015; Bai et al. Reference Bai, Su, Xiao, Lenaz, Sakyi, Liang, Chen and Yang2018). These processes lead to different effects, including depletion in Mg and Cr and enrichment in Ti and Fe3+. Also, Ti-rich chromite is stable at high temperature but releases Ti to form ilmenite lamellae on cooling in oxidizing conditions (e.g. Spencer & Lindsley, Reference Spencer and Lindsley1981; Frost, Reference Frost and Lindsley1991; Appel et al. Reference Appel, Appel and Rollinson2002). Similar conditions can be inferred for ilmenite lamellae in the Banavara Cr-spinels (Fig. 3c, e), and Zn may also have been partially introduced to the Cr-spinels at this stage (Abzalov, Reference Abzalov1998).

During fractional crystallization or partial melting, trace elements show larger variations than major elements, thus trace elements are important proxies for monitoring melt–rock reactions and magmatic differentiation in Cr-spinel (Pearce et al. Reference Pearce, Barke, Edwards, Parkinson and Leat2000). Recent studies have shown that trace-element concentrations in Cr-spinel can be used to decipher the environment in which the Cr-spinel crystallized (e.g. Pagé & Barnes, Reference Pagé and Barnes2009; González-Jiménez et al. Reference González-Jiménez, Augé, Gervilla, Bailly, Proenza and Griffin2011, Reference González-Jiménez, Griffin, Proenza, Gervilla, O’Reilly, Akbulut, Pearson and Arai2014; Colás et al. Reference Colás, González-Jiménez, Griffin, Fanlo, Gervilla, O’Reilly, Pearson, Kerestedjian and Proenza2014, Reference Colás, Padrón-Navarta, González-Jiménez, Griffin, Fanlo, O’Reilly, Gervilla, Proenza, Pearson and Escayola2016).

Lenaz et al. (Reference Lenaz, Musco, Petrelli, Caldeira, De Min, Marzoli, Mata, Perugini, Princivalle, Boumehdi, Bensaid and Youbi2017) showed that elements such as V, Ni, Mn and Ga can be correlated with Cr2O3 in spinels in mantle xenoliths. In ophiolites, the situation is much more complex owing to serpentinization. However, Colás et al. (Reference Colás, González-Jiménez, Griffin, Fanlo, Gervilla, O’Reilly, Pearson, Kerestedjian and Proenza2014) demonstrated that the cores of partly altered high-Cr-spinel are enriched in Zn, Co and Mn but strongly depleted in Ga, Ni and Sc, attributed to a decrease in Mg no. and Al produced by the crystallization of chlorite in the pores of porous chromite. Non-porous chromite can be enriched in Ti, Ni, Zn, Co, Mn and Sc but depleted in Ga, suggesting that fluid-assisted processes have obliterated the primary magmatic signature. In addition, Colás et al. (Reference Colás, Padrón-Navarta, González-Jiménez, Griffin, Fanlo, O’Reilly, Gervilla, Proenza, Pearson and Escayola2016) reported that the order of increasing compatibility with MgAl2O4-rich spinels is Ti, Sc, Ni, V, Ge, Mn, Cu, Sn, Co, Ga and Zn.

According to Colás et al. (Reference Colás, Padrón-Navarta, González-Jiménez, Griffin, Fanlo, O’Reilly, Gervilla, Proenza, Pearson and Escayola2016), a systematic increase in Zn and Co coupled with a net decrease in Ga during hydrous metamorphism of chromitite bodies cannot be explained exclusively by compositional changes of major elements in the Cr-spinel. The most likely explanation is that minor and trace elements in Cr-spinel in metamorphosed chromitites are controlled by interactions with metamorphic fluids involved in the formation of chlorite. There is no correlation between Cr no. and most trace elements apart from Zn in the Banavara Cr-spinels (Fig. 8). As suggested by Abzalov (Reference Abzalov1998), this covariation of Zn and Cr no. may be related to a single hydrothermal event. Even though they are not related to Cr no., Mn, Ni, Ga and Co show a positive correlation (R2 in the range 0.88−0.97) suggesting they have a common origin.

Fig. 8. Bivariate plots of transition elements showing strong positive correlations between (a) Mn versus Ga, (b) Mn, Ga and Ni versus Co, and (c) negative correlation between ZnO and Cr no.

The distribution patterns of major, minor and trace elements in Cr-spinels from chromitite normalized to Cr-spinel from MORB are compared to those from the Nuggihalli schist belt in Figure 6. The trace-element patterns do not show any particular trend and the two patterns are distinctly different. The Banavara Cr-spinels are depleted in Al, Ni, Mg, Co, Sc and show enrichment in Ga, Zn and Mn.

The relationships between mineral chemistry, structural parameters (cell edge a0 and oxygen positional parameter u) and tectonic setting have been considered in detail in recent years (Fig. 9). In Figure 9, the Banavara chromites are compared to other Archaean occurrences: the layered complexes of Bushveld (Lenaz et al. Reference Lenaz, Braidotti, Princivalle, Garuti and Zaccarini2007) and Stillwater (Lenaz et al. Reference Lenaz, Garuti, Zaccarini, Cooper and Princivalle2012), the Ujragassuit, Fiskenaesset and Zimbabwe complexes (Rollinson et al. Reference Rollinson, Adetunji, Lenaz and Szilas2017), the Amsaga complex in Mauritania (Lenaz et al. Reference Lenaz, Rigonat, Skogby and Berger2018), the Sittampundi complex in south India (unpub. data) and the Archaean Nuggihalli chromite (Lenaz et al. Reference Lenaz, Andreozzi, Mitra, Bidyananda and Princivalle2004). The Banavara spinels are similar to those from anorthositic complexes such as Sittampundi, Amsaga and Fiskenaesset, showing the highest oxygen positional parameter value ever recorded for natural Cr-spinels. They differ from Cr-spinels in the Bushveld and Stillwater layered complexes and the Nuggihalli komatiites. Crystal chemical studies are not commonly applied to detrital material (Lenaz & Princivalle, Reference Lenaz and Princivalle1996, Reference Lenaz and Princivalle2005; Carbonin et al. Reference Carbonin, Menegazzo, Lenaz and Princivalle1999; Lenaz et al. Reference Lenaz, Carbonin, Gregoric and Princivalle2002, Reference Lenaz, Logvinova, Princivalle and Sobolev2009 a, Reference Lenaz, Princivalle and Schmitz2015), but they can be helpful in identifying sources and oxidation processes.

Fig. 9. Oxygen positional parameter, u, versus cell edge, a. Red circles – Cr-spinels from Banavara (this study); black circles – Cr-spinels from Sittampundi (unpub. data); grey circles, squares and star – Cr-spinels from Amsaga (Mauritania) in amphibole, chlorite and talc-serpentine matrix, respectively (Lenaz et al. Reference Lenaz, Rigonat, Skogby and Berger2018); yellow, purple and green circles – Cr-spinels from Fiskenaesset and Ujragassuit (Greenland) and Zimbabwe, respectively (Rollinson et al. Reference Rollinson, Adetunji, Lenaz and Szilas2017); blue squares – Cr-spinels from Rum (Scotland, Lenaz et al. Reference Lenaz, O’Driscoll and Princivalle2011); green field – Cr-spinels from Bushveld and Stillwater complexes (Lenaz et al. Reference Lenaz, Braidotti, Princivalle, Garuti and Zaccarini2007, Reference Lenaz, Garuti, Zaccarini, Cooper and Princivalle2012); yellow field – Cr-spinels from Nuggihalli komatiites (Lenaz et al. Reference Lenaz, Andreozzi, Mitra, Bidyananda and Princivalle2004).

The oxygen positional parameter is a consequence of the distribution of cations in the T and M sites, which can reflect the cooling history of the crystal (Della Giusta et al. Reference Della Giusta, Princivalle and Carbonin1986; Princivalle et al. Reference Princivalle, Della Giusta and Carbonin1989). Rapid cooling creates disorder among trivalent cations such as Al and/or Fe3+ in the T sites (Parisi et al. Reference Parisi, Lenaz, Princivalle and Sciascia2014) while divalent cations Mg and Fe2+ occupy the M sites. In contrast, slow cooling creates a more ordered situation with trivalent cations in the M sites and divalent in the T sites. The geothermometer of Princivalle et al. (Reference Princivalle, Della Giusta, De Min and Piccirillo1999) allows us to calculate the intracrystalline closure temperature (T c) derived from the Mg–Al exchange between the two sites M and T, yielding a temperature of c. 1130 °C, although the very low Mg content, and consequently the Mg–Al exchange, may have affected this result. Even in this case, it is not possible to identify a possible provenance for these detrital Cr-spinels.

It is difficult to arrive at a unique interpretation of the Cr-spinels, as they have a complex magmatic/metamorphic history. Furthermore, their original composition cannot be determined. The last event that occurred at the lowest temperature is possibly related to hydrothermal alteration that occurred in the quartz arenite. This provoked recrystallization, resulting in a decrease in Cr no. and an increase in ZnO, as well as the negative crystals sometimes filled by quartz. We can only speculate about their earlier history and origin. Cr-spinels occurring in Archaean complexes are chemically different from those in younger complexes such as ophiolites, and their structural parameters are also different. The low temperature of hydrothermal alteration probably did not mask the primary cation distribution formed at higher temperature, in which case their similarity to Archaean layered complexes in the u versus cell edge diagram (Fig. 9) is real. However, the trace-element compositions of Cr-spinels from such complexes are not currently available, so it cannot be assessed whether the distribution of Ni, Ga, Co and Mn is magmatic or a due to later event. As the partition coefficients of these elements differ, a metamorphic event would have redistributed them differently. It is therefore possible that the observed abundances of these Cr-spinels are primary.

6. Conclusions

This combined detrital zircon isotopic (U–Pb, Lu–Hf), geochemical and single crystal X-ray refinement study of the Banavara quartzite (Sargur supracrustal unit) Cr-spinel provides important insights into the evolution of the Dharwar Craton. These are:

  1. (i) The association of zircon and Cr-spinel in the Banavara quartzite suggests that significant basic and ultrabasic magmatism took place during a relatively short period before emplacement of the host gneissic rocks.

  2. (ii) Detrital zircons belong to two age populations with concordant U–Pb ages: an older population with ages ranging from 3.15 to 2.9 Ga and a younger population at 2.6–2.5 Ga.

  3. (iii) The Lu–Hf isotopic systematics of the zircons provides evidence that 3.1–2.9 Ga juvenile rock components are the source of sediments that supplied the Sargur supracrustal rocks.

  4. (iv) Interpretation of the depositional and magmatic setting of the Sargur Group is fraught with difficulties because the enclaves in the orthogneisses may be derived from protoliths of widely different ages and settings, which were juxtaposed tectonically during a series of gneiss-forming events in the period 3.4–2.6 Ga.

Acknowledgements

BM initiated this research at the University of Mainz during an INSA-DFG Exchange Programme. Further analytical work was carried out during BM’s visit to CCFS (Macquarie) under a Visiting Fellowship programme. We thank Rosanna Murphy for help with zircon and chromite trace-element analysis at Macquarie, Stephan Buhre during EPMA analysis at Mainz, Beate Schmitte for assistance in the LA-ICP-MS laboratory at Münster, and Gianluca Turco with SEM analyses on chromites at the University of Trieste. Two anonymous reviewers and Dr Kathryn Goodenough, journal editor, are appreciated for their constructive and insightful comments. This is contribution 1613 from the ARC Centre of Excellence for Core to Crust Fluid Systems (http://www.ccfs.mq.edu.au) and 1435 from the GEMOC Key Centre (http://www.gemoc.mq.edu.au). The analytical data were obtained using instrumentation funded by DEST Systemic Infrastructure Grants, ARC LIEF, NCRIS/AuScope, industry partners and Macquarie University. BM was financially supported by a Department of Science and Technology, Government of India project during the course of the work. Dr R. Srinivasan is thanked for help during fieldwork and for discussions.

Supplementary material

To view supplementary material for this article, please visit https://doi.org/10.1017/S001675682100025X

References

Abzalov, MZ (1998) Chrome-spinels in gabbro-wehrlite intrusions of the Pachenga area, Kola Peninsula, Russia: emphasis on alteration features. Lithos 43, 109–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Allan, JF, Sack, RO and Batiza, R (1988) Cr-rich spinels as petrogenetic indicators: MORB-type lavas from the Lamont seamount chain, eastern Pacific. American Mineralogist 73, 741–53.Google Scholar
Appel, CC, Appel, PWU and Rollinson, HR (2002) Complex chromite textures reveal the history of an early Archaean layered ultramafic body in west Greenland. Mineralogical Magazine 66, 1029–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arai, S and Okada, H (1991) Petrology of serpentine sandstone as a key to a tectonic development of serpentine belts. Tectonophysics 195, 6581.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bai, Y, Su, B-X, Xiao, Y, Lenaz, D, Sakyi, PA, Liang, Z, Chen, C and Yang, S-H (2018) Origin of reverse-zoned Cr-spinels from the Paleoproterozoic Yanmenguan mafic-ultramafic complex in the North China Craton. Minerals 8, 62. doi: 10.3390/min8020062.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barnes, SJ and Roeder, PL (2001) The range of spinel compositions in terrestrial mafic and ultramafic rocks. Journal of Petrology 42, 2279–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bhaskar Rao, YJ, Beck, W, Rama Murthy, V, Nirmal Charan, S and Naqvi, SM (1983) Geology, geochemistry and age of metamorphism of Archaean grey gneisses around Channarayapatna, Hassan District, Karnataka, South India. In Precambrian of South India (eds Naqvi, SM and Rogers, JW), pp. 309–28. Memoirs of the Geological Society of India no. 4.Google Scholar
Bidyananda, M and Mitra, S (2005) Chromitites of komatiitic affinity from Archaean Nuggihalli greenstone belt of south India. Mineralogy and Petrology, 84, 169–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carbonin, S, Menegazzo, G, Lenaz, D and Princivalle, F (1999) Crystal chemistry of two detrital Cr-spinels with unusually low values of oxygen positional parameter: oxidation mechanism and possible origin. Neues Jahrbuch für Mineralogie – Monatshefte 8, 359–71.Google Scholar
Cawood, PA, Hawkesworth, CJ and Dhuime, B (2012) Detrital zircon record and tectonic setting. Geology 40, 875–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cawood, PA, Nemchin, AA, Leverenz, A, Saeed, A and Ballance, PF (1999) U/Pb dating of detrital zircons: implications for the provenance record of Gondwana margin terranes. Geological Society of America Bulletin 111, 1107–19.2.3.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chadwick, B, Ramakrishnan, M, Vasudev, VN and Viswanatha, MN (1989) Facies distribution and structure of a Dharwar volcano-sedimentary basin: evidence for late Archaean transpression in south India. Journal of Geological Society, London 146, 825–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Colás, V, González-Jiménez, JM, Griffin, WL, Fanlo, I, Gervilla, F, O’Reilly, SY, Pearson, NJ, Kerestedjian, T and Proenza, JA (2014) Fingerprints of metamorphism in chromite: new insights from minor and trace elements. Chemical Geology 389, 137–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Colás, V, Padrón-Navarta, JA, González-Jiménez, JM, Griffin, WL, Fanlo, I, O’Reilly, SY, Gervilla, F, Proenza, JA, Pearson, NJ and Escayola, MP (2016) Compositional effects on the solubility of minor and trace elements in oxide spinel minerals: insights from crystal-crystal partition coefficients in chromite exsolution. American Mineralogist 101, 1360–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cookenboo, HO, Bustin, RM and Wilks, KR (1997) Detrital chromian spinel compositions used to reconstruct the tectonic setting of provenance; implications for orogeny in the Canadian Cordillera. Journal of Sedimentary Research 67, 116–23.Google Scholar
Della Giusta, A, Princivalle, F and Carbonin, S (1986) Crystal chemistry of a suite of natural Cr-bearing spinels with 0.15<Cr<1.07. Neues Jahrbuch für Mineralogie – Abhandlungen 155, 319–30.Google Scholar
Dick, HJB and Bullen, T (1984) Chromian spinel as a petrogenetic indicator in abyssal and alpine-type peridotites and spatially associated lavas. Contributions to Mineralogy and Petrology 86, 5476.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Faupl, P, Petrakakis, K, Migiros, G and Pavlopoulos, A (2002) Detrital blue amphiboles from the western Othrys Mountain and their relationship to the blueschist terrains of the Hellenides (Greece). International Journal of Earth Sciences 91, 433–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frost, BR (1991) Stability of oxide minerals in metamorphic rocks. In Oxide Minerals: Petrologic and Magnetic Significance (ed. Lindsley, DH), pp. 469–87. Reviews in Mineralogy Series Vol. 25. Washington: Mineralogical Society of America.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gerdes, A and Zeh, A (2006) Combined U–Pb and Hf isotope LA-(MC)ICP-MS analyses of detrital zircons: comparison with SHRIMP and new constraints for the provenance and age of an Armorican metasediment in Central Germany. Earth and Planetary Science Letters 249, 4761.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
González-Jiménez, JM, Augé, T, Gervilla, F, Bailly, L, Proenza, JA and Griffin, WL (2011) Mineralogy and geochemistry of platinum-rich chromitites from the mantle-crust transition zone at Ouen Island, New Caledonia Ophiolite. Canadian Mineralogist 49, 1549–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
González-Jiménez, JM, Griffin, WL, Proenza, JA, Gervilla, F, O’Reilly, SY, Akbulut, M, Pearson, NJ and Arai, S (2014) Chromitites in ophiolites: how, where, when, why? Part II. The crystallization of chromitites. Lithos 189, 140–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
González-Jiménez, JM, Kerestedjian, TN, Proenza, JA and Gervilla, F (2009) Metamorphism on chromite ores from the Dobromirtsi ultramafic massif, Rhodope mountains (SE Bulgaria). Geologica Acta 7, 413–29.Google Scholar
González-Jiménez, JM, Locmelis, M, Belousova, E, Griffin, WL, Gervilla, F, Kerestedjian, TN, O’Reilly, SY, Pearson, NJ and Sergeeva, I (2015) Genesis and tectonic implications of podiform chromitites in the metamorphosed ultramafic massif of Dobromirtsi (Bulgaria). Gondwana Research 27, 555–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Griffin, WL, Pearson, NJ, Belousova, EA, Jackson, SR, van Achterbergh, E, O’Reilly, SY and Shee, SR (2000) The Hf isotope composition of cratonic mantle: LAM-MC-ICPMS analysis of zircon megacrysts in kimberlites. Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta 64, 133–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guitreau, M, Mukasa, SB, Loudin, L and Krishnan, S (2017) New constraints on the early formation of the Western Dharwar Craton (India) from igneous zircon U–Pb and Lu–Hf isotopes. Precambrian Research 302, 3349.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hokada, T, Horie, K, Satish-Kumar, M, Ueno, Y, Nasheeth, A, Mishima, K and Shiraishi, K (2013) An appraisal of Archaean supracrustal sequences in Chitradurga Schist Belt, Western Dharwar Craton, Southern India. Precambrian Research 227, 99119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Howard, KE, Hand, M, Barovich, KM, Reid, A, Wade, BP and Belousova, EA (2009) Detrital zircon ages: improving interpretation via Nd and Hf isotopic data. Chemical Geology 262, 277–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Irvine, TN (1967) Chromium spinel as a petrogenetic indicator. II. Petrologic applications. Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences 4, 71103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jackson, SE, Pearson, NJ, Griffin, WL and Belousova, EA (2004) The application of laser ablation-inductively coupled plasma-mass spectrometry to in situ U–Pb zircon geochronology. Chemical Geology 211, 4769.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jayananda, M, Chardon, D, Peucat, JJ and Capdevila, R (2006) 2.61 Ga potassic granites and crustal reworking in the western Dharwar craton, southern India: tectonic, geochronologic and geochemical constraints. Precambrian Research 150, 126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jayananda, M, Chardon, D, Peucat, J-J, Tushipokla, and Fanning, CM (2015) Paleo- to Mesoarchean TTG accretion and continental growth in the western Dharwar craton, Southern India: constraints from SHRIMP U–Pb zircon geochronology, whole-rock geochemistry and Nd–Sr isotopes. Precambrian Research 268, 295322.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jayananda, M, Kano, T, Peucat, JJ and Channabasappa, S (2008) 3.35 Ga komatiite volcanism in the western Dharwar Craton, southern India: constraints from Nd isotopes and whole-rock geochemistry. Precambrian Research 162, 160–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kern, R (1987) The equilibrium form of a crystal. In Morphology of Crystals, Part A (ed. Sunagawa, I), pp. 77206. Tokyo: Terra.Google Scholar
Kinny, PD and Maas, R (2003) Lu–Hf and Sm–Nd isotope systems in zircon. Reviews in Mineralogy and Geochemistry 53, 327–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kooijman, E, Berndt, J and Mezger, K (2012) U–Pb dating of zircon by laser ablation ICP-MS: recent improvements and new insights. European Journal of Mineralogy 24, 521.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Laemmlein, GG (1973) Morphology and Genesis of Crystals. Moscow: Nauka, 328 pp.Google Scholar
Lancaster, PJ, Dey, S, Storey, CD, Mitra, A and Bhunia, RK (2015) Contrasting crustal evolution processes in the Dharwar craton: insights from detrital zircon U–Pb and Hf isotopes. Gondwana Research 28, 1361–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lenaz, D, Andreozzi, GB, Mitra, S, Bidyananda, M. and Princivalle, F (2004) Crystal chemical and 57Fe Mössbauer study of chromite from the Nuggihalli schist belt (India). Mineralogy and Petrology 80, 4557.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lenaz, D, Braidotti, R, Princivalle, F, Garuti, G and Zaccarini, F (2007) Crystal chemistry and structural refinement of chromites from different chromitite layers and xenoliths of the Bushveld Complex. European Journal of Mineralogy 19, 599609.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lenaz, D, Carbonin, S, Gregoric, M and Princivalle, F (2002) Crystal chemistry and oxidation state of one euhedral Cr-spinel crystal enclosed in a bauxite layer (Trieste Karst: NE Italy): some considerations on its depositional history and provenance. Neues Jahrbuch für Mineralogie – Monatshefte 5, 193206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lenaz, D, Garuti, G, Zaccarini, F, Cooper, RW and Princivalle, F (2012) The Stillwater Complex: the response of chromite crystal chemistry to magma injection. Geologica Acta 10, 3341.Google Scholar
Lenaz, D, Kamenetsky, VS, Crawford, AJ and Princivalle, F (2000) Melt inclusions in detrital spinels from the SE Alps (Italy-Slovenia): a new approach to provenance studies of sedimentary basins. Contributions to Mineralogy and Petrology 139, 748–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lenaz, D, Kamenetsky, V and Princivalle, F (2003) Cr-spinel supply in the Brkini, Istrian and Krk Island flysch basins (Slovenia, Italy and Croatia). Geological Magazine 140, 335–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lenaz, D, Logvinova, AM, Princivalle, F and Sobolev, NV (2009a) Structural parameters of chromites included in diamonds and kimberlites from Siberia: a new tool in discriminating different ultramafic sources. American Mineralogist 94, 1067–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lenaz, D, Mazzoli, C, Spišiak, J, Princivalle, F and Maritan, L (2009b) Detrital Cr-spinel in the Šambron-Kamenica Zone (Slovakia): evidence for an ocean-spreading zone in the Northern Vardar suture? International Journal of Earth Sciences 98, 345–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lenaz, D, Musco, ME, Petrelli, M, Caldeira, R, De Min, A, Marzoli, A, Mata, J, Perugini, D, Princivalle, F, Boumehdi, MA, Bensaid, IAA and Youbi, N (2017) Restitic or not? Insights from trace element content and crystal – structure of spinels in African mantle xenoliths. Lithos 278–281, 464–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lenaz, D, O’Driscoll, B and Princivalle, F (2011) Petrogenesis of the anorthosite-chromitite association: crystal-chemical and petrological insights from the Rum Layered Suite, NW Scotland. Contributions to Mineralogy and Petrology 162, 1201–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lenaz, D and Princivalle, F (1996) Crystal-chemistry of detrital chromites in sandstones from Trieste (NE Italy). Neues Jahrbuch für Mineralogie – Monatshefte 9, 429–34.Google Scholar
Lenaz, D and Princivalle, F (2005) The crystal chemistry of detrital chromian spinel from the Southeastern Alps and Outer Dinarides: the discrimination of supplies from areas of similar tectonic setting? Canadian Mineralogist 43, 1305–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lenaz, D, Princivalle, F and Schmitz, B (2015) First crystal-structure determination of chromites from an acapulcoite and ordinary chondrites. Mineralogical Magazine 79, 755–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lenaz, D, Rigonat, N, Skogby, H and Berger, J (2018) Following the amphibolite to greenschist metamorphic path through the structural parameters of spinels from Amsaga (Mauritania). Minerals 8, 27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lenaz, D and Schmitz, B (2017) Crystal structure refinement of chromites from two achondrites, their T-f(O2) conditions and implications. Meteoritics and Planetary Science 52, 1763–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lindsley, DH (1976) The crystal chemistry and structure of oxide minerals as exemplified by the Fe-Ti oxides. In Oxide Minerals (ed. Rumble, D III), pp. 160. Chelsea, MI: Mineralogical Society of America.Google Scholar
Locmelis, M, Pearson, NJ, Barnes, SJ and Fiorentini, ML (2011) Ruthenium in komatiitic chromite. Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta 75, 3645–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maibam, B, Deomurari, MP and Goswami, JN (2003) 207Pb–206Pb ages of zircon from the Nuggihalli schist belt, Dharwar craton, southern India. Current Science 85, 1482–5.Google Scholar
Maibam, B, Gerdes, A and Goswami, JN (2016) U–Pb and Hf isotope records in detrital and magmatic zircon from eastern and western Dharwar craton, southern India: evidence for coeval Archaean crustal evolution. Precambrian Research 275, 496512.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maibam, B, Gerdes, A, Srinivasan, R and Goswami, JN (2017) U–Pb and Lu–Hf systematics of zircons from Sargur metasediments, Dharwar Craton, Southern India: new insights on the provenance and crustal evolution. Current Science 113, 1394–401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maibam, B, Goswami, JN and Srinivasan, R (2011) Pb–Pb zircon ages of Archaean metasediments and gneisses from the southern part of the Dharwar craton, southern India: implications for the antiquity of the Eastern Dharwar craton. Journal of Earth System Sciences 120, 643–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mange, MA and Morton, AC (2007) Geochemistry of heavy minerals. In Heavy Minerals in Use (eds Mange, MA and Wright, DT), pp. 345–91. Developments in Sedimentology, vol. 58. Amsterdam: Elsevier.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maya, JM, Bhutani, R, Balakrishnan, S and Rajee Sandhya, S (2017) Petrogenesis of 3.15 Ga old Banasandra komatiites from the Dharwar craton, India: implications for early mantle heterogeneity. Geoscience Frontiers 8, 467–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mellini, M, Rumori, C and Viti, C (2005) Hydrothermally reset magmatic spinels in retrograde serpentinites: formation of “ferritchromit” rims and chlorite aureoles. Contributions to Mineralogy and Petrology 149, 266–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morton, AC (1991) Geochemical studies of detrital heavy minerals and their application to provenance research. In Developments in Sedimentary Provenance Studies (eds Morton, AC, Todd, SP and Haughton, PDW), pp. 3145. Geological Society of London, Special Publication no. 57.Google Scholar
Naha, K, Srinivasan, R, Gopalan, K, Pantulu, GVC, Subba Rao, MV, Vrevsky, AB and Bogomolov, YS (1993) The nature of the basement in the Archaean Dharwar craton of southern India and the age of the Peninsular Gneiss. Proceedings of the Indian Academy of Sciences 102, 547–65.Google Scholar
Naha, K, Srinivasan, R and Jayaram, S (1991) Sedimentational, structural and migmatitic history of the Archaean Dharwar tectonic province, southern India. Proceedings of Indian Academy of Sciences (Earth and Planetary Sciences) 100, 413–33.Google Scholar
Naqvi, SM and Rogers, JJW (1987) Precambrian Geology of India. Oxford Monographs on Geology and Geophysics no. 6. New York: Oxford University Press, 223 pp.Google Scholar
Nowell, GM, Kempton, PD, Noble, SR, Fitton, JG, Saunders, AD, Mahoney, JJ and Taylor, RN (1998) High precision Hf isotope measurements of MORB and OIB by thermal ionisation mass spectrometry: insights into the depleted mantle. Chemical Geology 149, 211–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nutman, AP, Chadwick, B, Ramakrishnan, M and Viswanathan, MN (1992) SHRIMP U–Pb ages of detrital zircon in Sargur supracrustal rocks in western Karnataka, southern India. Journal of the Geological Society of India 39, 367–74.Google Scholar
Pagé, P and Barnes, S-J (2009) Using trace elements in chromites to constrain the origin of podiform chromitites in the Thetford Mines ophiolite, Québec, Canada. Economic Geology 104, 9971018.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parisi, F, Lenaz, D, Princivalle, F and Sciascia, L (2014) Ordering kinetics in synthetic Mg(Al,Fe3+)2O4 spinels: first quantitative elucidation of the whole Al-Mg-Fe partitioning, rate constants, activation energies and implication for geothermometry. American Mineralogist 99, 2203–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pearce, JA, Barke, PE, Edwards, SJ, Parkinson, IJ and Leat, PT (2000) Geochemistry and tectonic significance from the South Sandwich arc-basin system, South Atlantic. Contributions to Mineralogy and Petrology 139, 3653.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peucat, JJ, Mahabaleshwar, B and Jayananda, M (1993) Age of younger tonalitic magmatism and granulitic metamorphism in the South India transition zone (Krishnagiri area): comparison with older Peninsular gneisses from the Gorur-Hassan area. Journal of Metamorphic Geology 11, 879–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pober, E and Faupl, P (1988) The chemistry of detrital chromian spinels and its implications for the geodynamic evolution of the Eastern Alps. Geologische Rundschau 77, 641–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Press, S (1986) Detrital spinels from alpine type source rocks in the Middle Devonian sediments of the Rhenisch Massif. Geologische Rundschau 75, 333–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Princivalle, F, Della Giusta, A and Carbonin, S (1989) Comparative crystal chemistry of spinels from some suites of ultramafic rocks. Mineralogy and Petrology 40, 117–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Princivalle, F, Della Giusta, A, De Min, A and Piccirillo, EM (1999) Crystal chemistry and significance of cation ordering in Mg–Al rich spinels from high-grade hornfels (Predazzo-Monzoni, NE Italy). Mineralogical Magazine 63, 257–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Radhakrishna, BP (1983) Archaean granite-greenstone terrain of south India shield. In Precambrian of South India (eds Naqvi, SM and Rogers, JJW), pp. 146. Memoirs of the Geological Society of India no. 4.Google Scholar
Ramakrishnan, M (1994) Stratigraphic evolution of Dharwar craton. In GeoKarnataka (Ravindra, M and Ranganathan, N), pp. 635. Mysore Geological Department Centenary Volume. Bangalore: Karnataka Assistant Geologists’ Association, Department of Mines and Geology.Google Scholar
Ramakrishnan, M (2009) Precambrian mafic magmatism in the western Dharwar craton, southern India. Journal of the Geological Society of India 73, 101–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ramakrishnan, M and Vaidyanathan, R (2008) Geology of India, Volume 1. Bangalore: Geological Society of India, 556 pp.Google Scholar
Ramiengar, AS, Devadu, GR, Viswanatha, MN, Chayapathi, N and Ramakrishnan, M (1978) Banded chromite-fuchsite quartzite in the older supracrustal sequence of Karnataka. Journal of the Geological Society of India 19, 577–82.Google Scholar
Roeder, PL (1994) Chromite: from the fiery rain of chondrules to the Kilauea Iki lava lake. Canadian Mineralogist 320, 729–46.Google Scholar
Rogers, JJW and Callahan, EJ (1989) Diapiric trondhjemites of the western Dharwar Craton, southern India. Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences 26, 244–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rollinson, H, Adetunji, J, Lenaz, D and Szilas, K (2017) Archaean chromitites show constant Fe3+/ΣFe in Earth’s asthenospheric mantle since 3.8 Ga. Lithos 282–283, 316–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Russell, J, Chadwick, B, Krishna Rao, B and Vasudev, VN (1996) Whole-rock PbPb isotopic ages of Late Archaean limestones, Karnataka, India. Precambrian Research 78, 261–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sack, RO and Ghiorso, MS (1991) Chromian spinels as petrogenetic indicators: thermodynamics and petrological applications. American Mineralogist 76, 827–47.Google Scholar
Sarangi, S, Gopalan, K and Srinivasan, R (2007) Small-scale sampling for Pb–Pb dating of marbles: example from the Sargur supracrustal rocks, Dharwar Craton, South India. Precambrian Research 152, 8391.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sarma, SD, McNaughton, NJ, Belusova, E, Ram Mohan, M and Fletcher, IR (2012) Detrital zircon U–Pb ages and Hf isotope systematics from the Gadag Greenstone Belt: Archean crustal growth in the western Dharwar Craton, India. Gondwana Research 22, 843–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sciunnach, D and Garzanti, E (1997) Detrital chromian spinels record tectono-magmatic evolution from Carboniferous rifting to Permian spreading in Neotethys (India, Nepal and Tibet). Offioliti 22, 101–10.Google Scholar
Sircombe, KN (1999) Tracing provenance through the isotope ages of littoral and sedimentary detrital zircon, eastern Australia. Sedimentary Geology 124, 4767.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spencer, KJ and Lindsley, DH (1981) A solution model for co-existing iron-titanium oxides. American Mineralogist 66, 1181–201.Google Scholar
Spiegel, C, Siebel, W and Frisch, W (2002) Sr and Nd isotope ratios of detrital epidote as provenance indicator and their significance for the reconstruction of the exhumation history of the Central Alps. Chemical Geology 189, 231–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Srinivasan, R and Naha, K (1996) Apropos of the Sargur Group in the Early Precambrian Dharwar tectonic province. In Recent Researches in Geology and Geophysics of the Precambrian (ed. Saha, AK), pp. 43–8. Recent Researches in Geology vol. 16. New Delhi: Hindustan Publishing Corporation.Google Scholar
Sunagawa, I (1987) Morphology of minerals. In Morphology of Crystals, Part B (ed. Sunagawa, I), pp. 509–88, Tokyo: Terra.Google Scholar
Swami Nath, J and Ramakrishnan, M (eds) (1981) Early Precambrian Supracrustals of Southern Karnataka. Memoirs of the Geological Survey of India vol. 112, 350 pp.Google Scholar
Swami Nath, J, Ramakrishnan, M and Viswanatha, MN (1976) Dharwar stratigraphic model and Karnataka craton evolution. Records of the Geological Survey of India 107, 149–75.Google Scholar
Utter, T (1978) The origin of detrital chromites in the Klerksdorp Goldfield, Witwatersrand, South Africa. Neues Jahrbuch für Mineralogie – Abhandlungen 133, 191209.Google Scholar
Viswanatha, MN and Ramakrishnan, M (1981) Sargur and allied belts. In Early Precambrian Supracrustals of Southern Karnataka (eds Swami Nath, J and Ramakrishnan, M), pp. 4159. Memoirs of the Geological Survey of India vol. 112.Google Scholar
von Eynatten, H and Gaupp, R (1999) Provenance of Cretaceous synorogenic sandstones from the Eastern Alps: constraints from framework petrography, heavy mineral analysis, and mineral chemistry. Sedimentary Geology 124, 81111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wang, W, Zhou, M-F, Yan, D-P, Li, L and Malpas, J (2013) Detrital zircon record of Neoproterozoic active-margin sedimentation in the eastern Jiangnan Orogen, South China. Precambrian Research 235, 119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zeh, A and Gerdes, A (2012) U–Pb and Hf isotope record of detrital zircons from gold-bearing sediments of the Pietersburg Greenstone Belt (South Africa) – Is there a common provenance with the Witwatersrand Basin? Precambrian Research 204–205, 4656.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhu, B, Kidd, WSF, Rowley, DB, Brian, S and Currie, BS (2004) Chemical compositions and tectonic significance of chrome-rich spinels in the Tianba Flysch, Southern Tibet. Journal of Geology 112, 417–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Figure 0

Fig. 1. (a) Geological map of the Dharwar Craton (modified from Peucat et al.1993). (b) Geological map of the Banavara area (after Ramiengar et al.1978). Locations of important cities, towns and sample are marked.

Figure 1

Fig. 2. Photomicrographs of studied quartzite all in crossed nicols (except a). (a, b) Parallel alignment of quartz, Cr-spinel and fuchsite mica. Note the distribution of Cr-spinels and fuchsite arranged in subparallel alignment showing a distinct foliation. Interstices are filled with finer quartz grains. (c) Rutile needles as inclusion in quartz. (d) Tourmaline, sub-rounded zircon and fuchsite mica as inclusion in quartz.

Figure 2

Fig. 3. (a) Quartzite thin-section showing Cr-spinel (Chr) distribution in the sample. (b) Photomicrograph of a quartz inclusion in a Cr-spinel (Chr) grain. (c) Exsolved ilmenite (Ilm) phases in Cr-spinel (Chr). (d) Scanning electron microscope image of single Cr-spinel grain. (e) Ti distribution in the same Cr-spinel grain showing exsolution pattern.

Figure 3

Fig. 4. (a) Histogram and (b) Concordia diagram for the Banavara detrital zircons showing bimodal age distribution.

Figure 4

Fig. 5. Plot of ϵHf versus U–Pb ages for the analysed zircons. CHUR – chondritic reservoir (bulk earth); DM – depleted mantle. Data points above the DM line are not considered during the discussion.

Figure 5

Fig. 6. Comparative plot of major and trace elements in Banavara (this study) and Nuggihalli Cr-spinel showing strongly differing distribution of the elements.

Figure 6

Fig. 7. SEM images of Cr-spinels: (a) polished crystal with pores; (b) map of Si distribution in the crystal; (c) broken crystal surface showing the presence of pores; (d) enlargement of octahedral pores.

Figure 7

Fig. 8. Bivariate plots of transition elements showing strong positive correlations between (a) Mn versus Ga, (b) Mn, Ga and Ni versus Co, and (c) negative correlation between ZnO and Cr no.

Figure 8

Fig. 9. Oxygen positional parameter, u, versus cell edge, a. Red circles – Cr-spinels from Banavara (this study); black circles – Cr-spinels from Sittampundi (unpub. data); grey circles, squares and star – Cr-spinels from Amsaga (Mauritania) in amphibole, chlorite and talc-serpentine matrix, respectively (Lenaz et al. 2018); yellow, purple and green circles – Cr-spinels from Fiskenaesset and Ujragassuit (Greenland) and Zimbabwe, respectively (Rollinson et al. 2017); blue squares – Cr-spinels from Rum (Scotland, Lenaz et al. 2011); green field – Cr-spinels from Bushveld and Stillwater complexes (Lenaz et al. 2007, 2012); yellow field – Cr-spinels from Nuggihalli komatiites (Lenaz et al. 2004).

Supplementary material: Image

Maibam et al. supplementary material

Maibam et al. supplementary material 1

Download Maibam et al. supplementary material(Image)
Image 3.7 MB
Supplementary material: File

Maibam et al. supplementary material

Maibam et al. supplementary material 2

Download Maibam et al. supplementary material(File)
File 36.4 KB
Supplementary material: File

Maibam et al. supplementary material

Maibam et al. supplementary material 3

Download Maibam et al. supplementary material(File)
File 48.5 KB