Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-kw2vx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-11T08:01:43.701Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A context in which finite or unique ergodicity is generic

Part of: Topological dynamics Ergodic theory

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 September 2020

ANDY Q. YINGST
ANDY Q. YINGST*
Affiliation:
University of South Carolina Lancaster, PO Box 889, Lancaster, SC29721, USA (e-mail: andy.yingst@gmail.com)
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

We show that for good measures, the set of homeomorphisms of Cantor space which preserve that measure and which have no invariant clopen sets contains a residual set of homeomorphisms which are uniquely ergodic. Additionally, we show that for refinable Bernoulli trial measures, the same set of homeomorphisms contains a residual set of homeomorphisms which admit only finitely many ergodic measures.

Keywords

group actionssmooth dynamicsgood measuresunique ergodicity

MSC classification

Primary: 37A05: Measure-preserving transformations
Secondary: 37B05: Transformations and group actions with special properties (minimality, distality, proximality, etc.)
Type
Original Article
Information
Ergodic Theory and Dynamical Systems , Volume 41 , Issue 10 , October 2021 , pp. 3178 - 3200
Check for updates
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2020. Published by Cambridge University Press

References

REFERENCES

Akin, E.. Good measures on Cantor space. Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 357 (2005), 2681–2722.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alpern, S. and Prasad, V. S.. Typical Dynamics of Volume Preserving Homeomorphisms. Vol. 139. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 2000.Google Scholar
Dahl, H.. Dynamical Choquet simplices and Cantor minimal systems. PhD Thesis, Copenhagen, 2008.Google Scholar
Akin, E., Glasner, E. and Weiss, B.. Generically there is but one self homeomorphism of the Cantor set. Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 360 (2008), 3613–3630.10.1090/S0002-9947-08-04450-4CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Glasner, E. and Weiss, B.. Weak orbit equivalence of minimal Cantor systems. Internat. J. Math. 6 (1995), 559–579.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ibarlucía, T. and Melleray, J.. Dynamical simplices and minimal homeomorphisms. Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 145 (2017), 4981–4994.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kechris, A. S. and Rosendal, C.. Turbulence, amalgamation, and generic automorphism of homogeneous structures. Proc. Lond. Math. Soc. 94 (2007), 302–350.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oxtoby, J. C. and Ulam, S. M.. Measure preserving homeomorphisms and metrical transitivity. Ann. Math. 42 (1941), 874–920.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dougherty, R., Mauldin, R. D. and Yingst, A.. On homeomorphic Bernoulli measures on the Cantor space. Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 359 (2007), 6155–6166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sun, L. and Wang, M.. An algorithm for a decomposition of weighted digraphs: with applications to life cycle analysis in ecology. J. Math. Biol. 54 (2007), 199–226.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed