Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-cphqk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-11T00:28:25.958Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Some Varieties of Epistemic Injustice: Reflections on Fricker

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 January 2012

Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Miranda Fricker's important study of epistemic injustice is focussed primarily on testimonial injustice and hermeneutic injustice. It explores how agents' capacities to make assertions and provide testimony can be impaired in ways that can involve forms of distinctively epistemic injustice. My paper identifies a wider range of forms of epistemic injustice that do not all involve the ability to make assertions or offer testimony. The paper considers some examples of some other ways in which injustice can prevent someone from participating in inquiry.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2010

References

REFERENCES

Fricker, Miranda. 2007. Epistemic Injustice: Power and the Ethics of Knowing. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hookway, Christopher. 2008. “Questions, Epistemology, and Inquiries.” Grazer Philosophische Studien 77: 123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Little, Deandra. 2004. Teaching a Diverse Student Body: Practical Strategies for Enhancing Our Students' Learning. 2nd ed. Charlottesville, VA: Teaching Resource Center, University of Virginia. http://trc.virginia.edu/Publications/Diversity/TOC_PDF.htm Google Scholar
Sadker, Myra and Sadker, David. 1986. “Sexism in the Classroom: From Grade School to Graduate School.” The Phi Delta Kappan 67(7): 512–5.Google Scholar
Tannen, Deborah. 1994. Gender and Discourse. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar