Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-cphqk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-11T11:15:35.992Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Can NNP be used for welfare comparisons?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 January 2007

GEIR B. ASHEIM
GEIR B. ASHEIM
Affiliation:
Department of Economics, University of Oslo, P.O. Box 1095 Blindern, NO-0317 Oslo, Norway. E-mail: g.b.asheim@econ.uio.no
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

This paper contains a critical assessment of the claim that NNP can be used for welfare comparisons. The analysis assumes that national accounts are comprehensive (in particular ‘greened’ by taking into account environmental amenities and natural resource depletion), but does not assume optimal resource allocation. The general conclusion is that greater NNP corresponds to welfare enhancement only if net investment flows are revalued. Real utility-NNP and real measurable NNP made comparable across time by means of a consumer price index allow for such revaluation, and thus indicate welfare improvement.

Type
Research Article
Information
Environment and Development Economics , Volume 12 , Issue 1 , February 2007 , pp. 11 - 31
Copyright
© 2007 Cambridge University Press

Footnotes

I thank two anonymous referees for useful comments, Bengt Kriström, Karl-Gustav Löfgren and other participants at the 12th Ulvön Conference on Environmental Economics for helpful discussions, Cornell University for hospitality, and the Research Council of Norway for financial support.