Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-d8cs5 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-11T06:02:04.288Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

BOUNDED CONJUGACY CLASSES AND CONJUGACY CLASSES SUPPORTING INVARIANT MEASURES AND AUTOMORPHISMS

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 February 2025

C. R. E. RAJA*
Affiliation:
Stat-Math Unit, Indian Statistical Institute (ISI), 8th Mile Mysore Road, Bangalore 560 059, India
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

We consider conjugacy classes in a locally compact group G that support finite G-invariant measures. If G is a property (M) extension of an abelian group, in particular, if G is a metabelian group, then any such conjugacy class is relatively compact. As an application, centralisers of lattices in such groups have bounded conjugacy classes. We use the same techniques to obtain results in the case of totally disconnected, locally compact groups.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2025. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of Australian Mathematical Publishing Association Inc.

1 Introduction

Let G be a locally compact group. For $x\in G$ , let $C_x = \{ gxg^{-1} \mid g\in G\}$ be the conjugacy class containing x and let $B(G) = \{ x\in G \mid \overline {C_x} ~\mathrm {is ~~ compact} \}$ . It is easily seen that $B(G)$ is a characteristic subgroup containing the centre $Z(G) = \{ x\in G \mid gx =xg\ \mathrm{for~all} g\in G \}$ . In general, $B(G)$ is not closed. There are locally compact groups G with $B(G)$ as a proper dense subgroup (see [Reference Tits9, Proposition 3]), but if G is a totally disconnected, locally compact (tdlc) group that is generated by a compact set, then [Reference Möller7, Theorem 2] shows that $B(G)$ is closed. The subgroup $B(G)$ plays a crucial role in the location of finite central (positive) measures. A measure is called central if it is invariant under the conjugate action of the group G (see [Reference Greenleaf, Moskowitz and Preiss-Rothschild4, Theorem 1.5]).

A conjugacy class supporting a central measure is in $B(G)$ for connected Lie groups [Reference Greenleaf, Moskowitz and Preiss-Rothschild5, Theorem 1]. We prove this result for a certain extension of abelian groups (see Theorem 1.1) and obtain interesting applications (see Corollary 3.1) as in [Reference Greenleaf, Moskowitz and Preiss-Rothschild5, Theorem 3]. We also obtain some general results in the case of tdlc groups (see Section 4).

There is a close connection with finite covolume subgroups (see [Reference Greenleaf, Moskowitz and Preiss-Rothschild4, Reference Greenleaf, Moskowitz and Preiss-Rothschild5]). In this context, we say that a locally compact group has property (M) if, for any closed subgroup H of G with $G/H$ admitting a finite G-invariant measure, $G/H$ is compact (see [Reference Bader, Caprace, Gelander and Mozes1, Reference Mostow8] for further details on property (M)). It can be easily seen that abelian groups and compact groups have property (M). We obtain the following result.

Theorem 1.1. Let G be a locally compact group and let $x\in G$ be such that ${\mu (C_x)=1}$ for some conjugate-invariant finite measure $\mu $ . If G has a closed abelian normal subgroup A such that $G/A$ has property (M), then $C_x$ has compact closure: that is, $x\in B(G)$ .

In particular, if G is a metabelian locally compact group, then $C_x$ has compact closure: that is, $x\in B(G)$ .

Remark 1.2. An example of a metabelian group G having a finite covolume subgroup that is not cocompact is provided in [Reference Bader, Caprace, Gelander and Mozes1]. Hence, groups under consideration in Theorem 1.1 need not have property (M).

2 Automorphisms of bounded displacement

Following [Reference Tits9], a (bicontinuous) automorphism ${\alpha }$ of a locally compact group G is called an automorphism of bounded displacement if $\{ {\alpha }(x)x^{-1} \mid x\in G \}$ has compact closure. If ${\alpha }$ is an inner automorphism defined by $x\in G$ (that is, ${\alpha }(g) = xgx^{-1}$ ), then ${\alpha }$ is an automorphism of bounded displacement if and only if $x\in B(G)$ . Thus, in order to identify elements in $B(G)$ , we study automorphisms of bounded displacement. We obtain the following result.

Proposition 2.1. Let G be a locally compact group containing a closed abelian normal subgroup A such that $G/A$ has property (M). Suppose that ${\alpha }$ is an automorphism of G such that $G/H$ has a finite G-invariant measure, where $H= \{x \in G \mid {\alpha } (x) =x \}$ and ${\alpha } (A)=A$ . Then ${\alpha }$ is an automorphism of bounded displacement.

Our proof relies on certain shift-invariant properties in convolutions of probability measures on locally compact groups. For a locally compact group X, let ${\cal M} (X)$ be the space of all regular Borel probability measures (that is, positive measures with total measure one) on X equipped with the weak* topology: that is, $\rho _n \to \rho \in {\cal M} (X)$ if $\int f(x) \,d\rho _n(x) \to \int f(x) \,d\rho (x)$ for all continuous bounded functions f on X. For $x\in X$ and $\rho $ in ${\cal M} (X)$ , $x\rho $ and $ \rho x \in {\cal M} (X)$ are defined by $x\rho (E) = \rho (x^{-1}E)$ and $\rho x(E) = \rho (Ex^{-1})$ for any Borel set E in X. The convolution of two measures $\mu , {\lambda } \in {\cal M} (X)$ is denoted by $\mu *{\lambda } $ and is defined by $\mu *{\lambda } (E) = \int \mu (Ex^{-1}) \,d{\lambda } (x)$ for any Borel set E in X. For any automorphism ${\alpha } $ of X and $\mu \in {\cal M} (X)$ , define ${\alpha } (\mu ) $ by ${\alpha } (\mu ) (E) = \mu ({\alpha } ^{-1}(E)) $ for any Borel set E in X (see [Reference Heyer6] for more details on probability measures on groups).

Lemma 2.2. Let G be a locally compact group and let A be a closed abelian normal subgroup of G. Suppose that ${\beta } \colon G \to A$ is a continuous map such that ${\beta } (xy) = {\beta } (x) x{\beta } (y) x^{-1}$ for all $x, y \in G$ . Then $H = \{ x\in G \mid {\beta } (x) =e\}$ is a closed subgroup. If $G/H$ has a finite G-invariant measure, then ${\beta } (A)$ is contained in a compact subgroup of A.

Proof. Since ${\beta }$ is continuous, H is a closed subgroup. Assume that $G/H$ carries a finite G-invariant measure $\mu $ , say. Normalising $\mu $ , we may assume that $\mu $ is a probability measure. For $x\in G$ and $h \in H$ , we have ${\beta } (xh) = {\beta } (x)$ . Hence, ${\beta } $ induces a continuous map $\tilde {\beta } \colon G/H \to A$ defined by $\tilde {\beta } (xH) = {\beta } (x)$ for all $x\in G$ . Take ${\lambda } = \tilde {\beta } (\mu )$ . Then ${\lambda }$ is a Borel probability measure on A such that ${\beta } (x) x{\lambda } x^{-1} = {\lambda }$ for all $x\in G$ . Since A is an abelian group, ${\lambda } ={\beta } (a) a {\lambda } a^{-1}= {\beta } (a) {\lambda }$ . Let $M=\{ a \in A \mid a {\lambda } = {\lambda } \}$ . Then, by [Reference Heyer6, Theorems 1.2.4 and 1.2.7], M is a compact subgroup of A and ${\beta } (A) \subset M$ .

Proof of Proposition 2.1.

Let $N= \overline {AH}$ . Then N is a closed ${\alpha }$ -invariant subgroup of G. Since $H\subset N$ , $G/N$ has a finite G-invariant measure. Since $G/N$ is a quotient of $G/A$ , the assumption that $G/A$ has property (M) implies that $G/N$ is compact.

Define ${\beta }$ on $N $ by ${\beta } (x) = {\alpha } (x) x^{-1}$ for all $x\in N$ . Since ${\alpha } (x) =x$ for all $x\in H$ , we have ${\beta } (x) \in A$ . Thus, ${\beta } \colon N \to A$ is a well-defined continuous map. Also, ${\beta } (xy) = {\beta } (x) x{\beta } (y)x^{-1}$ for all $x, y \in N$ and $H= \{ x\in N \mid {\beta } (x) =e \}$ . Since $G/H$ has a finite G-invariant measure and $H\subset N$ , it follows that $N/H$ has a finite N-invariant measure. By Lemma 2.2, there is a compact subgroup M of A such that ${\beta } (A)\subset M$ . Since ${\beta } (ah) = {\beta } (a)$ , we have ${\beta } (AH)\subset M$ and, since $AH$ is dense in N, ${\beta } (N) \subset M$ . Thus, ${\alpha } (x) \subset Mx$ for all $x\in N$ and M is a compact subgroup of A.

Since $G/N$ is compact, there is a compact subset C of G such that $G= CN$ . For $g\in G$ , there are $x\in N$ and $y \in C$ such that $g = yx$ . This implies that ${\alpha } (g) g^{-1}={\alpha } (y) {\alpha } (x) x^{-1} y^{-1} \subset {\alpha } (C)MC^{-1}$ . Thus, ${\alpha }$ is an automorphism of bounded displacement.

3 Theorem 1.1 and applications

Proof of Theorem 1.1.

Let ${\alpha }$ be the inner automorphism defined by $x^{-1}$ and define $H= \{ g \in G \mid gx= xg \}$ . The group G has a canonical action on $G/H$ on the left and G acts on $C_x$ by conjugation. The map $\theta \colon C_x \to G/H$ defined by $\theta (gxg^{-1}) = gH$ is a well-defined G-equivariant Borel isomorphism and $\theta (\mu )$ is a finite G-invariant measure on $G/H$ . It follows from Proposition 2.1 that ${\alpha }$ is an automorphism of bounded displacement. Thus, there is a compact set C such that ${\alpha } (g) \subset Cg$ for all $g\in G$ . This implies that $x^{-1}gxg^{-1}\subset C$ for all $g\in G$ and hence $gxg^{-1} \subset xC$ for all $g\in G$ . Thus, the conjugacy class $C_x$ containing x has compact closure.

The following result on the centraliser of finite covolume subgroups is a kind of density theorem in the sense that any element commuting with a finite covolume subgroup commutes with all elements up to a compact set.

Corollary 3.1. Let G be a locally compact group containing a closed abelian normal subgroup A such that $G/A$ has property (M) and H is a finite covolume subgroup of G. Then $Z(H) \subset B(G)$ .

Proof. Let $x\in Z(H)$ . Then $Z(x)$ contains H, and hence $G/Z(x)$ has a finite G-invariant measure. Let $\eta \colon G/Z(x) \to C_x$ be $\eta (g) = gxg^{-1}$ . Then $\eta $ is a well-defined continuous map preserving the G-action. Hence, the conjugacy class of x supports a finite G-invariant measure. Therefore, by Theorem 1.1, the conjugacy class of x has compact closure. Thus, $Z(H) \subset B(G)$ .

We now look at the case when A, as above, has no compact subgroups. As examples, ${\mathbb R} ^n$ and ${\mathbb Z} ^n$ have no compact subgroups.

Corollary 3.2. Let $G,H, A$ and ${\alpha }$ be as in Proposition 2.1. Suppose that A has no compact subgroups. Then $ G/H$ is compact. In particular, if $x \in G$ is such that ${\mu (C_x)>0} $ for some conjugate-invariant finite measure $\mu $ , then the corresponding conjugacy class $C_x$ is compact.

Proof. Let ${\beta } \colon A \to A$ be ${\beta } (a) = {\alpha } (a)a^{-1}$ for all $a \in A$ . Then ${\beta }$ is a continuous map and ${\beta } (xy) = {\beta }(x)x{\beta }(y)x^{-1} = {\beta }(x){\beta }(y)$ as A is abelian. By Lemma 2.2, ${\beta }(A)$ is contained in a compact subgroup of A. Since A has no compact subgroup, ${\beta }$ is trivial. Thus, $A \subset H$ and $G/H$ is a quotient of $G/A$ . By the assumption that $G/A$ has property (M), $G/H$ is compact.

4 Tdlc groups

We now consider tdlc groups. For an automorphism ${\alpha }$ of a tdlc group G, define the ${\alpha }$ -invariant subgroups $U_{\alpha } = \{ x\in G \mid \lim _{n \to \infty } {\alpha } ^n(x) = e \}$ and $M_{\alpha } = \{ x\in G \mid \overline {\{ {\alpha } ^n(x) \mid n \in {\mathbb Z} \} } \text { is compact}\}$ , where $U_{\alpha }$ is called the contraction group of the automorphism ${\alpha }$ (see [Reference Baumgartner and Willis2] for various results on $U_{\alpha }$ and $M_{\alpha } $ ). In the tdlc case, we obtain the following result.

Proposition 4.1. Let G be a tdlc group and let ${\alpha }$ be an automorphism of G. Suppose that $G/H$ has a finite G-invariant measure, where $H = \{x \in G \mid {\alpha } (x) =x \}$ . Then ${\alpha }$ fixes a compact open subgroup of G and $M_{\alpha }$ is a subgroup of finite index in G.

Proof. Let $N= \overline {HU_{\alpha }}$ . Since ${\alpha } (x) =x$ for $x\in H$ , H normalises $U_{\alpha }$ . Then N is a tdlc group invariant under ${\alpha }$ . Let ${\beta } \colon N/H \to N$ be ${\beta } (xH) = {\alpha } (x) x^{-1}$ for all $x\in N$ . Since ${\alpha } (x) = x$ for all $x\in H$ , ${\beta }$ is a well-defined continuous map on $N/H$ . Since $N= \overline {HU_{\alpha } }$ and ${\alpha } (x) =x $ for all $x\in H$ , we have ${\beta } (N)\subset \overline {U_{\alpha }}$ . By [Reference Baumgartner and Willis2, Corollaries 3.27 and 3.30], $\overline {U_{\alpha }} = U_0U_{\alpha }$ , where $U_0$ is an ${\alpha }$ -invariant compact subgroup of G. In fact, we have ${U_0 = \overline {U_{\alpha } }\cap \overline {U_{{\alpha } ^{-1}}}}$ . This implies that ${\alpha } ^n(x)U_0 \to U_0$ for all $x\in \overline {U_{\alpha } }$ .

Let $\bar {\alpha } \colon N/H \to N/H$ be $\bar {\alpha } (xH) = {\alpha } (x)H$ for all $x\in N$ . Since ${\alpha } (H) =H$ , $\bar {\alpha }$ is a continuous map (in fact, $\bar {\alpha }$ is an N-equivariant homeomorphism).

For $x\in N$ , ${\beta } (\bar {\alpha } (xH)) = {\alpha } ^2 (x) {\alpha } (x^{-1}) = {\alpha } ({\beta } (x))$ . Thus, ${\beta } \bar {\alpha } = {\alpha } {\beta }$ .

Since $H\subset N$ , $N/H$ has an N-invariant probability measure $\mu $ , say. Let ${\lambda } = {\beta } (\mu )$ . Since ${\beta }$ is a continuous map, ${\lambda }$ is a probability measure on N. Since $\mu $ is an N-invariant probability measure and $\bar {\alpha } (gxH) = {\alpha } (g) \bar {\alpha } (xH)$ for all $g, x\in G$ , it follows that $\mu $ is $\bar {\alpha }$ -invariant. Since ${\beta } \bar {\alpha } = {\alpha } {\beta }$ , ${\lambda }$ is ${\alpha }$ -invariant, and hence ${\lambda } = {\alpha } ^n ({\lambda } ) $ for all n.

Let $\rho $ be the normalised Haar measure on the compact subgroup $U_0$ . Since ${\alpha } (U_0) = U_0$ , $\rho $ is ${\alpha }$ -invariant. Since ${\alpha } ^n(x)U_0 \to U_0$ for all $x\in \overline {U_{\alpha } }$ , we have ${\alpha } ^n({\lambda } * \rho )\to \rho $ . But ${\alpha } ^n ({\lambda } *\rho ) = {\alpha } ^n ({\lambda } ) *{\alpha } ^n (\rho ) = {\lambda } *\rho $ , so ${\lambda } * \rho =\rho $ . By considering the supports of the measures, we see that ${\lambda }$ is supported on $U_0$ .

Since $\mu $ is an N-invariant measure on $N/H$ , the support of $\mu $ is N. Since ${\beta } (\mu ) = {\lambda }$ , $\overline {{\beta } (N)}$ is the support of ${\lambda }$ , and hence ${\beta } (N) \subset U_0$ . This implies that ${\alpha } (x) \subset U_0x$ for all $x\in U_{\alpha }$ . Let $x\in U_{\alpha }$ . Then, for each $n \geq 1$ , we have ${\alpha } ^n (x) = g_nx$ for some $g_n \in U_0$ . Since $U_0$ is compact and ${\alpha } ^n(x) \to e$ as $n \to \infty $ , we have $x\in U_0$ . Thus, $U_{\alpha }\subset U_0 \subset \overline {U_{\alpha }}$ , and hence $\overline {U_{\alpha } }= U_0$ . Similarly, we may show that $\overline {U_{{\alpha } ^{-1}} }= U_0$ . By [Reference Baumgartner and Willis2, Proposition 3.24], ${\alpha }$ fixes a compact open subgroup K, say.

Since $M_{\alpha } = \{ x\in G \mid \overline {\{ {\alpha } ^n(x) \mid n \in {\mathbb Z} \} } \text { is compact} \}$ , $K\subset M_{\alpha }$ , and so $M_{\alpha }$ is open. Since ${\alpha } (x) = x$ for all $x\in H$ , $H\subset M_{\alpha }$ . This implies that $G/M_{\alpha }$ is a discrete G-space with a finite G-invariant measure and hence $G/M_{\alpha }$ is finite.

As a consequence, we have the following result on property (M) for tdlc groups.

Corollary 4.2. Let G be a tdlc group and let H be a closed subgroup of G such that $G/H$ has a finite G-invariant measure. If H is a compactly generated abelian group, then $G/H$ is compact.

Remark 4.3. For the metabelian counter-example provided in [Reference Bader, Caprace, Gelander and Mozes1], the finite covolume subgroup H, although abelian, is not compactly generated. It may be noted that any compactly generated abelian tdlc group is a direct product of ${\mathbb Z} ^n$ and a compact group.

Proof of Corollary 4.2.

Let H be a compactly generated abelian subgroup of G with finite covolume. For $x\in H$ , let ${\alpha } _x$ be the inner automorphism defined by x on G: that is, ${\alpha } _x(g) =xgx^{-1}$ for all $g\in G$ . Since H is abelian, $H\subset Z(x)$ . Thus, $G/Z(x)$ has a finite G-invariant measure. By Proposition 4.1, each $x\in H$ fixes a compact open subgroup in G. Since H is a compactly generated abelian group, [Reference Willis10, Theorem 5.9] implies that H normalises a compact open subgroup K of G. Then $HK$ is a open subgroup G and hence $G/HK$ is a discrete G-space with a finite G-invariant measure. Therefore, $G/HK$ is finite. Thus, $G/H$ is compact.

We also have the following result for expansive automorphisms. An automorphism ${\alpha }$ of a tdlc group G is called expansive if $\bigcap {\alpha } ^n(U) = \{ e \}$ for some compact open subgroup U of G (see [Reference Glöckner and Raja3] for more details on expansive automorphisms on tdlc groups).

Corollary 4.4. Let G be a tdlc group and let ${\alpha }$ be an expansive automorphism of G. Suppose that $G/H$ has a finite G-invariant measure, where $H = \{x \in G \mid {\alpha } (x) =x \}$ . Then ${\alpha }$ fixes a compact open subgroup of G that is normalised by H and $G/H$ is compact.

Proof. By Proposition 4.1, $\overline {U_{\alpha }}= \overline {U_{{\alpha } ^{-1}}} =U_0 = \overline {U_{\alpha } }\cap \overline {U_{{\alpha } ^{-1}}}$ . Since ${\alpha }$ is expansive on G, Lemma 1.1 of [Reference Glöckner and Raja3] implies that $U_{\alpha } U_{{\alpha } ^{-1}}$ is open, and hence $U_0$ is open. Since ${\alpha } (x) =x$ for all $x\in H$ and $U_0 = \overline {U_{\alpha }}$ , it follows that H normalises $U_0$ . Since $G/H$ has a finite G-invariant measure, $G/HU_0$ is a discrete G-space with a finite G-invariant measure and hence $G/HU_0$ is finite. Thus, $G/H$ is compact.

Acknowledgement

I thank the referee for suggestions that improved the exposition and led to the correct version of Corollary 3.2.

Footnotes

The work was supported by SERC grant under MATRICS MTR/2022/000429.

References

Bader, U., Caprace, P. E., Gelander, T. and Mozes, S., ‘Lattices in amenable groups’, Fund. Math. 246(3) (2019), 217255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baumgartner, U. and Willis, G., ‘Contraction groups and scales of automorphisms of totally disconnected locally compact groups’, Israel J. Math. 142 (2004), 221248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Glöckner, H. and Raja, C. R. E., ‘Expansive automorphisms of totally disconnected, locally compact groups’, J. Group Theory 20 (2017), 589619.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greenleaf, F. P., Moskowitz, M. and Preiss-Rothschild, L., ‘Unbounded conjugacy classes in Lie groups and location of central measures’, Acta Math. 132 (1974), 225243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greenleaf, F. P., Moskowitz, M. and Preiss-Rothschild, L., ‘Compactness of certain homogeneous spaces of finite volume’, Amer. J. Math. 97 (1975), 248259.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heyer, H., Probability Measures on Locally Compact Groups, Ergebnisse der Mathematik und ihrer Grenzgebiete, 94 (Springer-Verlag, Berlin–New York, 1977).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Möller, R. G., ‘ ${\mathrm{FC}}^{-}$ -elements in totally disconnected groups and automorphisms of infinite graphs’, Math. Scand. 92 (2003), 261268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mostow, G. D., ‘Homogeneous spaces with finite invariant measure’, Ann. of Math. (2) 75 (1962), 1737.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tits, J., ‘Automorphismes à déplacement borné des groupes de Lie’, Topology 3 (1964), 97107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Willis, G. A., ‘Tidy subgroups for commuting automorphisms of totally disconnected groups: an analogue of simultaneous triangularisation of matrices’, New York J. Math. 10 (2004), 135.Google Scholar