No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Sources of Information for Discriminating MZ and DZ Twins by Dermatoglyphic Patterns
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 27 January 2025
Abstract
Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
It is shown that the within twin-pair difference is the most important source of information in determination of twin zygosity using dermatoglyphic data. Inclusion of a measure of among-pair variability provides added discrimination beyond that found with the within-pair difference alone.
- Type
- Brief Report
- Information
- Acta geneticae medicae et gemellologiae: twin research , Volume 26 , Issue 1 , January 1977 , pp. 83 - 86
- Copyright
- Copyright © The International Society for Twin Studies 1977
References
REFERENCES
Allen, G.
1968. Diagnostic efficiency of fingerprint and blood group differences in a series of twins. Acta Genet. Med. Gemellol., 17: 359–374.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bartlett, M.S., Please, N.W.
1963. Discrimination in the case of zero mean differences. Biometrika, 50: 17–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Christian, J.C., Kang, K.W., Norton, J.A.
1974. Choice of an estimate of genetic variance from twin data. Am. J. Hum. Genet., 26: 154–161.Google ScholarPubMed
Gaines, R.E., Elston, R.C.
1969. On the probability that a twin pair is monozygotic. Am. J. Hum. Genet., 21: 457–465.Google ScholarPubMed
Habbema, J.D.F., van der Burgt, A.T.
1974. Cases of doubt in allocation problems. Biometrika, 61: 313–324.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morton, N.E.
1974. Analysis of family resemblance. I. Introduction. Am. J. Hum. Genet., 26: 318–330.Google Scholar
Reed, T., Sprague, F.R., Kang, K.W., Nance, W.E., Christian, J.C.
1975. Genetic analysis of dermatoglyphic patterns in twins. Hum. Hered., 25: 263–275.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed