The pie-charts below show, for each of the five periods studied, the amount of space, expressed as a percentage of the whole, which is given to different categories of feature article. A number of points should be borne in mind. The first is that the periods are not of equal length, having been delimited not to facilitate statistical analysis but to highlight the role of academic anthropology within the synthetic. It follows that the curves to be extrapolated from the charts have only limited usefulness. Secondly, the unit of account is not the page but the article. This may vary greatly in length, but an average is between fifteen and twenty pages. Serialised texts have been counted according to the number of parts. Thirdly, the categorisation is broad and corresponds to the assumed intuitions of a typical reader, as well as to the divisions of labour from time to time announced by the Editorial Board. It is also naive, in the sense that it breaks the synthetic whole into discrete and banal sections and negates the disciplinary subversion promoted by Sartre. ‘Saint Genet’, for example, which appeared in 1950 in six parts and straddles every category, is designated as literature. The categories are as follows:

1. (a) politics (pol.): political and economic theory, analysis and commentary, feminism;

2. (b) literature (lit.): theory of literature, literary criticism, poetry and literary prose;

3. […]