INTRODUCTION

The laws that regulate the labor market – that intangible domain where transactions for labor take place – have not escaped the gaze of indicators. Since the turn of the century a multitude of labor market indicators have been produced within a strained ecology of international organizations concerned with the performance of labor markets. In some cases these organizations are concerned only with one dimension (the “efficiency”) of labor market regulation, notwithstanding the complex multidimensional character of labor law, its origins in social policy, its indeterminate economic effect (Deakin and Sarkar 2008), and indeed notwithstanding its original purpose of injecting equity into an otherwise unequal relationship.

Plotted on a continuum, the international organizations involved in the transnational shaping of the legal norms and institutions that regulate the labor market are poles apart in their mandates and worldviews. These organizations range from a powerful private international organization, funded almost entirely by private enterprise, with an agenda that pushes for labor markets governed primarily by private ordering and market principles to a public international law organization that promotes a coordinated regulatory framework enabling equitable participation in the labor market. This divergence of views among international organizations undermines the development and coherence of legal norms and standards for worker security and creates a fractious transnational legal order that has implications for the domestic debate on labor market regulation.