Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-6dbcb7884d-lhnfz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-13T20:32:26.679Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

6 - Advocate Science, values, and problem-oriented policing: why problem-oriented policing?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 September 2009

By
John E. Eck
Edited by
David Weisburd  and
Anthony A. Braga
John E. Eck
Affiliation:
Professor in the Division of Criminal Justice University of Cincinnati
David Weisburd
Affiliation:
Hebrew University of Jerusalem
Anthony A. Braga
Affiliation:
Harvard University, Massachusetts
Get access

Summary

Problem-oriented policing is so logical it is surprising it needs justification. Problem-oriented policing is based on the premises that (a) the public demands much of police; (b) the causes of these demands are often complex; (c) the police serve the public better when they make systematic inquiries into these complexities; (d) knowledge helps build new approaches to police services; and (e) learning from successful and unsuccessful innovations makes police more effective in handling the demands of the public. The validity of these premises can be seen if we pause to look at their opposites: (a) the public demands little of police; (b) the causes of these demands are simple; (c) systematic inquiry into the demands is of little use; (d) knowledge will not help build new approaches to police services; and (e) there is little to be learned from successes or failures, so examining them will not improve police effectiveness. None of these stand up to close scrutiny.

So why is problem-oriented policing often misinterpreted? One reason is that problem-oriented policing fundamentally redefines policing. It restates the police mission by creating a new unit of analysis for evaluating police actions: the “problem.” It shifts policing to a scientific approach to preventing crime and away from the routine application of the law. And it replaces the notion of the police as gatekeepers to the criminal justice system with the idea that police are central to many networks that affect public well-being.

This chapter describes the evolution of problem-oriented policing.

Type
Chapter
Information
Police Innovation
Contrasting Perspectives
 , pp. 117 - 132
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2006

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Anderson, D., Chenery, S., and Pease, K. (1995). Preventing repeat victimization: A report on progress in Huddersfield. London: Home Office, Police Research Group.Google Scholar
Associated Press. (1998, May 19). As dying teen bleeds nearby, hospital staff stays inside – incident prompts change in policy. Washington Post, p. A9.
Bittner, E. (1980). The functions of police in modern society. Rockville, MD: National Institute of Mental Health.Google Scholar
Boba, R. (2003). Problem analysis in policing. Washington, DC: Police Foundation.Google Scholar
Braga, A. A. (2001). The effects of hot spots policing on crime. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 578, 104–125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Braga, A. A. (2002). Problem-oriented policing and crime prevention. Monsey, NY: Criminal Justice Press.Google Scholar
Braga, A. A., Kennedy, D. M., Waring, E. J., and Piehl, A. M. (2001). Problem-oriented policing, deterrence, and youth violence: An evaluation of Boston's operation ceasefire. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 38 (3), 195–225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Braga, A. A., Weisburd, D. L., Waring, E. J.Mazerolle, L. G., Spelman, W., and Gajewski, F. (1999). Problem-oriented policing in violent crime places: A randomized controlled experiment. Criminology, 37 (3), 541–580.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bynum, T. (2001). Using analysis for problem-solving: A guidebook for law enforcement. Washington, DC: Office of Community Oriented Policing Services.Google Scholar
Center for Problem-Oriented Policing. (2004). InPART: Interactive problem analysis and response tool. Retrieved from www.popcenter.org.
Clarke, R. V. and Eck, J. E. (2003). Become a problem-solving crime analyst: In 55 small steps. London: Jill Dando Institute of Crime Science.Google Scholar
Clarke, R. V. and Goldstein, H. (2002). Reducing theft at construction sites: lessons from a problem-oriented project. In Tilley, N. (ed.), Analysis for crime prevention, 13 (pp. 89–130). Monsey, NY: Criminal Justice Press.Google Scholar
Clarke, R. V. and Goldstein, H. (2003). Thefts from cars in center-city parking facilities: A case study in implementing problem-oriented policing. In Knutsson, J. (ed.), Problem-oriented policing: From innovation to mainstream, 15 (pp. 257–298). Monsey, NY: Criminal Justice Press.Google Scholar
Cohen, J., Gorr, W., and Singh, P. (2003). Estimating intervention effects in varying risk settings: Do police raids reduce illegal drug dealing at nuisance bars?Criminology, 41 (2), 257–292.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Committee to Review Research on Police Policy and Practices. (2004). Fairness and effectiveness in policing: The evidence. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
Cordner, G. W. (1986). Fear of crime and the police: An evaluation of a fear-reduction strategy. Journal of Police Science and Administration, 14 (2), 223–233.Google Scholar
Eck, J. E. (1993). Alternative futures for policing. In Weisburd, D. and Uchida, C. (eds.), Police innovation and control of the police (pp. 59–79). New York: Springer Verlag.Google Scholar
Eck, J. E. (2001). Policing and crime event concentration. In Meier, R., Kennedy, L., and Sacco, V. (eds.), The process and structure of crime: criminal events and crime analysis (pp. 249–276). New Brunswick, NJ: Transactions.Google Scholar
Eck, J. E. (2002a). Assessing responses to problems: An introductory guide for police problem-solvers. Washington, DC: Office of Community Oriented Policing Services, US Department of Justice.
Eck, J. E. (2002b). Preventing crime at places. In L. W. Sherman, D. Farrington, B. Welsh, and D. L. MacKenzie (eds.), Evidence-based crime prevention (pp. 241–294). New York: Routledge.
Eck, J. E. (2003). Police problems: The complexity of problem theory, research and evaluation. In Knutsson, J. (ed.), Problem-oriented policing: From innovation to mainstream, 15 (pp. 67–102). Monsey, NY: Criminal Justice Press.Google Scholar
Eck, J. E. and Clarke, R. V. (2003). Classifying common police problems: A routine activity approach. In Smith, M. J. and Cornish, D. B. (eds.), Theory for practice in situational crime prevention, 16 (pp. 7–40). Monsey, NY: Criminal Justice Press.Google Scholar
Eck, J. E. and LaVigne, N. (1993). A police guide to surveying citizens and their environment. Washington: DC: Bureau of Justice Assistance.Google Scholar
Eck, J. E. and Rosenbaum, D. (1994). The new police order: Effectiveness, equity and efficiency in community policing. In Rosenbaum, D. (ed.), The challenges of community policing: Testing the promises (pp. 3–26). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eck, J. E. and Spelman, W. (1987). Problem-solving: Problem-oriented policing in Newport News. Washington, DC: Police Executive Research Forum.Google Scholar
Eck, J. E. and Wartell, J. (1998). Improving the management of rental properties with drug problems: A randomized experiment. In Mazerolle, L. G. and Roehl, J. (eds.), Civil Remedies and Crime Prevention, 9 (pp. 161–83). Monsey, NY: Criminal Justice Press.Google Scholar
Eck, J. E., Chainey, S., and Cameron, J. (2005). Mapping crime: Understanding hot spots. Washington, DC: US Department of Justice, National Institute of Justice.Google Scholar
Farrell, G. (1995). Preventing repeat victimization. In Tonry, M. and Farrington, D. P. (eds.), Building a safer society: Strategic approaches to crime prevention, 19 (pp. 469–534). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Forrester, D., Chatterton, M., and Pease, K. (1988). The Kirkhold burglary prevention project, Rochdale. London: Home Office.Google Scholar
Goldstein, H. (1979). Improving policing: A problem-oriented approach. Crime and Delinquency, 25 (2), 236–258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldstein, H. (1990). Problem-oriented policing. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Goldstein, H. and Susmilch, C. E. (1982a). The drinking-driver in Madison: A study of the problem and the community's response. Madison, WI: Law School, University of Wisconsin.
Goldstein, H. and Susmilch, C. E. (1982b). Experimenting with the problem- oriented approach to improve police service: A report and some reflections on two case studies. Madison, WI: Law School, University of Wisconsin.
Goldstein, H. and Susmilch, C. E. (1982c). The repeat sexual offender in Madison: A memorandum on the problem and the community's response. Madison, WI: Law School, University of Wisconsin.
Green, L. (1995). Policing places with drug problems: The multi-agency response team approach. In Eck, J. E. and Weisburd, D. (eds.), Crime and place, 4 (pp. 199–216). Monsey, NY: Criminal Justice Press.Google Scholar
Harcourt, B. E. (2001). Illusion of order: The false promise of broken windows policing. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Harries, K. (1999). Mapping crime: Principle and practice. Washington, DC: National Institute of Justice, Crime Mapping Research Center.Google Scholar
Helmick, D. O. (2002). Safety and farm labor vehicle education program. Sacramento, CA: California Highway Patrol.Google Scholar
Hester, J. and Rice, K. (2001). Operation crystal clear: In an effort to reduce glass related street violence, the message remains ‘crystal clear’. Liverpool, UK: Merseyside Police.
Hoare, M. A., Stewart, G., and Purcell, C. M. (1984). The problem oriented approach: Four pilot studies. London: Metropolitan Police, Management Services Department.
Hofstadter, D. R. (1979). Gödel, Escher, Bach: An eternal golden braid. New York: Vintage.Google Scholar
Homel, R., Hauritz, M., Wortley, R., McIlwain, G., and Carvolth, R. (1997). Preventing alcohol-related crime through community action: The surfers paradise safety action project. In Homel, R. (ed.), Policing for prevention: Reducing crime, public intoxication and injury, 7 (pp. 35–90). Monsey, NY: Criminal Justice Press.Google Scholar
Hope, T. (1994). Problem-oriented policing and drug market locations: Three case studies. In Clarke, R. V. (ed.), Crime prevention studies, 2 (pp. 5–31). Monsey, NY: Criminal Justice Press.Google Scholar
Kelling, G. L. and Sousa, W. H., Jr. (2001). Do police matter? An analysis of the impact of New York City's police reforms. Civic Report. New York: Manhattan Institute for Policy Research.
Kennedy, D. M., Braga, A. A., and Piehl, A. M. (1997). The (un)known universe: Mapping gangs and gang violence in Boston. In Weisburd, D. and McEwen, T. (eds.), Crime mapping, 8 (pp. 219–262). Monsey NY: Criminal Justice Press.Google Scholar
Kennedy, D. M., Braga, A. A., and Piehl, A. M. (2001). Developing and implementing operation ceasefire. In National Institute of Justice (ed.), Reducing gun violence: The Boston gun project's operation ceasefire. Washington, DC: National Institute of Justice.
Kenney, D. and Watson, T. S. (1996). Reducing fear in the schools: Managing conflict through student problem solving. Education and Urban Society, 28 (4), 436–455.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Matthews, R. (1993). Kerb-crawling, prostitution and multi-agency policing. London: Home Office.Google Scholar
Matthews, R. (1997). Developing more effective strategies for curbing prostitution. In Clarke, R. V. (ed.), Situational crime prevention: Successful case studies, 2nd ed. (pp. 74–82). Guilderland, NY: Harrow and Heston.Google Scholar
Mazerolle, L. G., Roehl, J., and Kadleck, C. (1998). Controlling social disorder using civil remedies: Results from a randomized field experiment in Oakland, California. In Mazerolle, L. and Roehl, J. (eds.), Civil remedies and crime prevention, 9 (pp. 141–160). Monsey, NY: Criminal Justice Press.Google Scholar
McGarrell, E. F., Chermak, S., Weiss, A., and Wilson, J. (2001). Reducing firearms violence through directed police patrol. Criminology and Public Policy, 1 (1), 119–148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Office of Community Oriented Policing Services. (1998). Problem-solving tips: A guide to reducing crime and disorder through problem-solving partnerships. Washington, DC: US Department of Justice, Office of Community Oriented Policing Services.
Professional Security. (2004, January). Manual of crime science: New breed aims to outwit the criminals. Professional Security, 64.
Read, T. and Tilley, N. (2000). Not rocket science? Problem-solving and crime reduction. London: Home Office.Google Scholar
Scott, M. S. (2000). Problem-oriented policing: Reflections on the first 20 years. Washington, DC: US Department of Justice, Office of Community Oriented Policing Services.Google Scholar
Scott, M. S. (2002). Rave parties. Washington, DC: Office of Community Oriented Policing Services.Google Scholar
Sherman, L. W. and Rogan, D. P. (1995a). Deterrent effects of police raids on crack houses: A randomized, controlled, experiment. Justice Quarterly, 12 (4), 755–781.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sherman, L. W. and Rogan, D. P. (1995b). Effects of gun seizures on gun violence: ‘Hot spots’ patrol in Kansas City. Justice Quarterly, 12 (4), 673–693.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sherman, L. W. and Weisburd, D. (1995). General deterrent effects of police patrol in crime “hot spots”: A randomized, controlled trial. Justice Quarterly, 12 (4), 625–648.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Solè, R. and Goodwin, B. (2000). Signs of life: How complexity pervades biology. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Weisburd, D. and Eck, J. E. (2004). What can police do to reduce crime, disorder and fear?Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 593, 42–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weisburd, D. and Green, L. (1995). Policing drug hot spots: The Jersey City drug market analysis experiment. Justice Quarterly, 12 (4), 711–735.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weisburd, D., Mastrofski, S., McNally, A. M., Greenspan, R., and Willis, J. J. (2003). Reforming to preserve: Compstat and strategic problem solving in American policing. Criminology and Public Policy, 2 (3), 421–456.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weisel, D. (1999). Conducting community surveys: A practical guide for law enforcement agencies. Washington, DC: Bureau of Justice Statistics and Office of Community Oriented Policing.Google Scholar
Weisel, D. (2002). Burglary of single-family homes. Washington, DC: Office of Community Oriented Policing Services.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×