Goldman, Alvin and Blanchard, Thomas. 2016. “Social Epistemology,” in The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. An introduction to social epistemology. Outlines the “three branches” that we discuss in this chapter. Contains an extensive bibliography.Google Scholar

Kitcher, Phillip. 1993. The Advancement of Science: Science Without Legend, Objectivity Without Illusions. One of the first works of the social epistemology of science. A classic in the field.Google Scholar

Intemann, Kristen. 2017. “Who Needs Consensus Anyway? Addressing Manufactured Doubt and Increasing Public Trust in Climate Science,” Public Affairs Quarterly. Argues against the usefulness of empirical findings regarding the degree of consensus over various climate hypotheses.Google Scholar

Huebner, Bryce, Kukla, Rebecca and Winsberg, Eric. 2017. “Making an Author in Radically Collaborative Research,” in Scientific Collaboration and Collective Knowledge. Argues that a useful notion of “group authorship” should be one that focuses on the existence of a group level entity that is accountable to challenge and criticism. The paper focuses on three case studies, one of which is climate science.Google Scholar

Biddle, Justin B. and Leuschner, Anna. 2015. “Climate Skepticism and the Manufacture of Doubt: Can Dissent in Science Be Epistemically Detrimental?,” European Journal for Philosophy of Science. Explores the question of when, if ever, scientific dissent is epistemically harmful. The authors argue that this situation obtains when dissenters violate conventional scientific standards.Google Scholar

Wilholt, Torsten. 2009. “Bias and Values in Scientific Research,” Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A. Introduces the idea of a conventional scientific standard as the solution to a problem that arises once we recognize the role that values play in science. Provides the philosophical background for Biddle and Leuschner, above.Google Scholar