Book contents
- Philosophy and Climate Science
- Philosophy and Climate Science
- Copyright page
- Epigraph
- Contents
- Figures
- Boxes
- Tables
- Preface
- 1 Introduction
- 2 Data
- 3 Models
- 4 Simulations
- 5 Chaos
- 6 Probability
- 7 Confidence
- 8 Decision
- 9 Values
- 10 Skill
- 11 Robustness
- 12 Diversity
- 13 Social Epistemology
- 14 Epilogue
- Appendix: Structural Stability and the “Hawkmoth Effect”*
- References
- Index
- References
References
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 19 April 2018
Book contents
- Philosophy and Climate Science
- Philosophy and Climate Science
- Copyright page
- Epigraph
- Contents
- Figures
- Boxes
- Tables
- Preface
- 1 Introduction
- 2 Data
- 3 Models
- 4 Simulations
- 5 Chaos
- 6 Probability
- 7 Confidence
- 8 Decision
- 9 Values
- 10 Skill
- 11 Robustness
- 12 Diversity
- 13 Social Epistemology
- 14 Epilogue
- Appendix: Structural Stability and the “Hawkmoth Effect”*
- References
- Index
- References
Summary
A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Philosophy and Climate Science , pp. 247 - 257Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2018
References
References
In making citations to the IPCC’s assessment reports, rather than using the cumbersome and confusing practice of the (Author Date) system, all of my citations are of the form IPCC, AR5, WG1, 11.1, p. 959 (unless a page number is not appropriate). This example refers to Chapter 11 of Working Group 1’s contribution to the Fifth Assessment Report (AR5), section 11.1, page 959. This makes finding the relevant section on the IPCC’s webpage much easier.
The three IPCC assessment reports that are cited in this volume are:
1) IPCC Third Assessment Report: Climate Change 2001 (TAR)
2) IPCC Fourth Assessment Report: Climate Change 2007 (AR4)
3) IPCC Fifth Assessment Report (AR5)
Almost all citations to any of the above are to the reports of “Working Group 1” which refer, respectively to
1) Working Group I: The Scientific Basis (for TAR)
2) Working Group I Report: “The Physical Science Basis” (for AR4)
3) Working Group I Report: “Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science Basis” (for AR5)
Alexander, Kaitlin and Easterbrook, Stephen M.. 2015. “The Software Architecture of Climate Models: A Graphical Comparison of CMIP5 and EMICAR5 Configurations.” Geoscientific Model Development 8 (4): 1221–1232.Google Scholar
Allison, I., Bindoff, N. L., Bindschadler, R. A., Cox, P. M., De Noblet, N., England, M. H., Francis, J. E. et al. 2009. “The Copenhagen Diagnosis.” The University of New South Wales Climate Change Research Centre, Sydney: 1–60. www.researchgate.net/profile/E_Rignot/publication/51997579_The_Copenhagen_Diagnosis/links/00b7d5159bf09dd86b000000.pdf.Google Scholar
Barnes, Eric Christian. 2008. The Paradox of Predictivism. 1st edition. Cambridge; New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Biddle, Justin B. and Leuschner, Anna. 2015. “Climate Skepticism and the Manufacture of Doubt: Can Dissent in Science Be Epistemically Detrimental?” European Journal for Philosophy of Science 5 (3): 261–278.Google Scholar
Biddle, Justin and Winsberg, Eric. 2009. “Value Judgements and the Estimation of Uncertainty in Climate Modeling.” In Magnus, P.D. and Busch, J., eds. New Waves in Philosophy of Science, p. 172–197. London: Palgrave McMillan.Google Scholar
Bogen, James and Woodward, James. 1988. “Saving the Phenomena.” The Philosophical Review 97 (3): 303–352.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bovens, Luc and Hartmann, Stephan. 2003. Bayesian Epistemology. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Bradley, Richard and Steele, Katie. 2015. “Making Climate Decisions.” Philosophy Compass 10 (11): 799–810.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bradley, Seamus, Frigg, Roman, Du, Hailiang and Smith, Leonard A.. 2014. “Model Error and Ensemble Forecasting: A Cautionary Tale.” Scientific Explanation and Methodology of Science 1: 58–66.Google Scholar
Bray, Dennis. 2010. “The Scientific Consensus of Climate Change Revisited.” Environmental Science & Policy 13 (5): 340–350.Google Scholar
Bray, Dennis and von Storch, Hans. 2010. CliSci2008: A Survey of the Perspectives of Climate Scientists Concerning Climate Science and Climate Change. GKSS-Forschungszentrum Geesthacht Geesthacht. www.hvonstorch.de/klima/pdf/GKSS_2010_9.CLISCI.pdf.Google Scholar
Brook, Barry. 2008. “So Just Who Does Climate Science?” Brave New Climate. August 31. https://bravenewclimate.com/2008/08/31/so-just-who-does-climate-science/.Google Scholar
Broome, John. 2012. Climate Matters: Ethics in a Warming World. 1st edition. New York: W. W. Norton & Company.Google Scholar
Bump, Philip. 2015. “Jim Inhofe’s Snowball Has Disproven Climate Change Once and for All.” TheWashington Post, February 26, sec. The Fix. www.washingtonpost.com/news/the-fix/wp/2015/02/26/jim-inhofes-snowball-has-disproven-climate-change-once-and-for-all/.Google Scholar
Calcott, Brett. 2011. “Wimsatt and the Robustness Family: Review of Wimsatt’s Re-Engineering Philosophy for Limited Beings.” Biology & Philosophy 26 (2): 281–293.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carlton, J. S., Perry-Hill, Rebecca, Huber, Matthew and Prokopy, Linda S.. 2015. “The Climate Change Consensus Extends beyond Climate Scientists.” Environmental Research Letters 10 (9): 094025.Google Scholar
Chaboureau, Jean-Pierre and Bechtold, Peter. 2002. “A Simple Cloud Parameterization Derived from Cloud Resolving Model Data: Diagnostic and Prognostic Applications.” Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences 59 (15): 2362–2372. doi:10.1175/1520-0469(2002)059<2362:ASCPDF>2.0.CO;2.Google Scholar
Churchman, C. West. 1948. “Statistics, Pragmatics, Induction.” Philosophy of Science 15 (3): 249–268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Churchman, C. West. 1956. “Science and Decision Making.” Philosophy of Science 23 (3): 247–249.Google Scholar
Clark, Andy. 1998. Being There: Putting Brain, Body, and World Together Again. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Cohen, L. Jonathan. 1995. An Essay on Belief and Acceptance. Reprint edition. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Cook, John, Oreskes, Naomi, Doran, Peter T., Anderegg, William R.L., Verheggen, Bart, Maibach, Ed W., Stuart Carlton, J. et al. 2016. “Consensus on Consensus: A Synthesis of Consensus Estimates on Human-Caused Global Warming.” Environmental Research Letters 11 (4): 048002.Google Scholar
Daron, Joseph D. and Stainforth, David A.. 2013. “On Predicting Climate under Climate Change.” Environmental Research Letters 8 (3): 034021.Google Scholar
Doran, Peter T. and Zimmerman, Maggie Kendall. 2009. “Examining the Scientific Consensus on Climate Change.” Eos, Transactions American Geophysical Union 90 (3): 22–23.Google Scholar
Douglas, Heather. 2000. “Inductive Risk and Values in Science.” Philosophy of Science 67 (4): 559–579.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Douglas, Heather. 2005. “Inserting the Public into Science.” In Democratization of Expertise?, 153–169. Springer. http://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/1-4020-3754-6_9.pdf.Google Scholar
Douglas, Heather. 2009. Science, Policy, and the Value-Free Ideal. University of Pittsburgh Press.Google Scholar
Dunne, John. 2006. “Towards Earth System Modelling: Bringing GFDL to life,” in “‘The Australian Community Climate and Earth System Simulator (ACCESS) - challenges and opportunities’: extended abstracts of presentations at the eighteenth annual BMRC Modelling Workshop 28 November - 1 December 2006.” Hollis, A.J. and Kariko, A.P. (editors) downloaded from www.cawcr.gov.au/publications/BMRC_archive/researchreports/RR123.pdf, accessed August 12, 2014.Google Scholar
“Earth System Modeling Framework.” 2016. Wikipedia. https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Earth_System_Modeling_Framework&oldid=749938673.Google Scholar
Elliott, Kevin C. 2011. “Direct and Indirect Roles for Values in Science.” Philosophy of Science 78 (2): 303–324.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elliott, Kevin C. and McKaughan, Daniel J.. 2014. “Nonepistemic Values and the Multiple Goals of Science.” Philosophy of Science 81 (1): 1–21.Google Scholar
Elliott, Kevin C. and Resnik, David B.. 2014. “Science, Policy, and the Transparency of Values.” Environmental Health Perspectives (Online) 122 (7): 647.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Farnsworth, Stephen J. and Robert Lichter, S.. 2012. “The Structure of Scientific Opinion on Climate Change.” International Journal of Public Opinion Research 24 (1): 93–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fehr, Carla and Plaisance, Kathryn S.. 2010. “Socially Relevant Philosophy of Science: An Introduction.” Synthese 177 (3): 301–316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fraassen, Bas C. van. 2010. Scientific Representation: Paradoxes of Perspective. Reprint edition. Oxford; New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Frigg, Roman, Bradley, Seamus, Du, Hailiang and Smith, Leonard A.. 2014. “Laplace’s Demon and the Adventures of His Apprentices.” Philosophy of Science 81 (1): 31–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frigg, Roman, Bradley, Seamus, Machete, Reason L. and Smith, Leonard A.. 2013. “Probabilistic Forecasting: Why Model Imperfection Is a Poison Pill.” In New Challenges to Philosophy of Science, 479–491. Springer. http://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-94-007-5845-2_39.Google Scholar
Frigg, Roman and Hartmann, Stephan. 2012. “Models in Science.” Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2012/entries/models-science.Google Scholar
Frigg, Roman and Reiss, Julian. 2009. “The Philosophy of Simulation: Hot New Issues or Same Old Stew?” Synthese 169 (3): 593–613.Google Scholar
Frigg, Roman, Smith, Leonard A. and Stainforth, David A.. 2013. “The Myopia of Imperfect Climate Models: The Case of UKCP09.” Philosophy of Science 80 (5): 886–897.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frigg, Roman, Smith, Leonard A. and Stainforth, David A.. 2015. “An Assessment of the Foundational Assumptions in High-Resolution Climate Projections: The Case of UKCP09.” Synthese 192 (12): 3979–4008.Google Scholar
Frisch, Mathias. 2013. “Modeling Climate Policies: A Critical Look at Integrated Assessment Models.” Philosophy & Technology 26 (2): 117–137. Reprinted in Climate Modeling: Philosophical and Conceptual Issues, edited by Lloyd, Elisabeth A. and Winsberg, Eric. 2018. Palgrave McMillan.Google Scholar
Frisch, Mathias. 2015. “Predictivism and Old Evidence: A Critical Look at Climate Model Tuning.” European Journal for Philosophy of Science 5 (2): 171–190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frisch, Mathias. 2017. “Climate Policy in the Age of Trump.” Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 27 (S2): 87–106.Google Scholar
Gleckler, Peter J., Taylor, Karl E. and Doutriaux, Charles. 2008. “Performance Metrics for Climate Models.” Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres 113 (D6). http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1029/2007JD008972/full.Google Scholar
Golaz, Jean-Christophe, Horowitz, Larry W. and Levy, Hiram. 2013. “Cloud Tuning in a Coupled Climate Model: Impact on 20th Century Warming.” Geophysical Research Letters 40 (10): 2246–2251.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldman, Alvin and Blanchard, Thomas. 2016. “Social Epistemology.” In The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, edited by Zalta, Edward N., Winter 2016. Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2016/entries/epistemology-social/.Google Scholar
Goldman, Alvin I. 2001. “Experts: Which Ones Should You Trust?” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 63 (1): 85–110.Google Scholar
Goodwin, William M. 2015. “Global Climate Modeling as Applied Science.” Journal for General Philosophy of Science 46 (2): 339–350.Google Scholar
Gordon, Neil D. and Klein, Stephen A.. 2014. “Low-Cloud Optical Depth Feedback in Climate Models.” Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres 119 (10): 2013JD021052. doi:10.1002/2013JD021052.Google Scholar
Grier, David. 2005. When Computers Were Human. Princeton University Press. http://press.princeton.edu/titles/7999.html.Google Scholar
Hahn, Hans, Neurath, Otto and Carnap, Rudolf. 1929. The Scientific Conception of the World: The Vienna Circle.Google Scholar
Hájek, Alan. 2003. “Interpretations of Probability.” The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Citeseer. http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary?doi=10.1.1.125.8314.Google Scholar
Held, Isaac and Randall, David. 2011. “Point/Counterpoint.” IEEE Software 28 (6): 62–65.Google Scholar
Hoefer, Carl. 2007. “The Third Way on Objective Probability: A Sceptic’s Guide to Objective Chance.” Mind 116 (463): 549–596.Google Scholar
Hollingsworth, Barbara. 2015. “97% Climbs to 99.5%: Obama Increases Percentage of Scientists Who Agree on Climate Change.” CNS News, December 2. www.cnsnews.com/news/article/barbara-hollingsworth/obama-ups-climate-change-consensus-paris-995-scientists.Google Scholar
Howard, Don A. 2003. “Two Left Turns Make a Right: On the Curious Political Career of North American Philosophy of Science at Midcentury.” In Alan W. Richardson and Gary L. Hardcastle, eds. Logical Empiricism in North America, pp. 25–93. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Huebner, Bryce, Kukla, Rebecca and Winsberg, Eric. 2017. “Making an Author in Radically Collaborative Research.” In Thomas Boyer-Kassem, Conor Mayo-Wilson and Michael Weisberg, eds. Scientific Collaboration and Collective Knowledge, 95–116. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hume, David. 2011. An Enquiry Concerning Human Understanding. Hollywood, FL: Simon & Brown.Google Scholar
Intemann, Kristen. 2015. “Distinguishing between Legitimate and Illegitimate Values in Climate Modeling.” European Journal for Philosophy of Science 5 (2): 217–232.Google Scholar
Intemann, Kristen. 2017. “Who Needs Consensus Anyway? Addressing Manufactured Doubt and Increasing Public Trust in Climate Science.” Public Affairs Quarterly 31 (3): 189–208.Google Scholar
Jeffrey, Richard C. 1956. “Valuation and Acceptance of Scientific Hypotheses.” Philosophy of Science 23 (3): 237–246.Google Scholar
Kellert, Stephen H. 1993. In the Wake of Chaos: Unpredictable Order in Dynamical Systems. 1st edition. Chicago: University Of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Kitcher, Phillip. 1993. The Advancement of Science: Science without Legend, Objectivity without Illusions. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Klein, Stephen A. and Hall, Alex. 2015. “Emergent Constraints for Cloud Feedbacks.” Current Climate Change Reports 1 (4): 276–287.Google Scholar
Knight, Frank H. 2012. Risk, Uncertainty and Profit. North Chelmsford, MA: Courier Corporation.Google Scholar
Knutti, Reto. 2018. “Climate Model Confirmation: From Philosophy to Predicting Climate in the Real World.” In Climate Modeling: Philosophical and Conceptual Issues, edited by Lloyd, Elisabeth A. and Winsberg, Eric. London: Palgrave McMillan.Google Scholar
Knutti, Reto and Hegerl, Gabriele C.. 2008. “The Equilibrium Sensitivity of the Earth’s Temperature to Radiation Changes.” Nature Geoscience 1 (11): 735–743.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kourany, Janet A. 2003a. “A Philosophy of Science for the Twenty-First Century.” Philosophy of Science 70 (1): 1–14.Google Scholar
Kuhn, Thomas S. 2012. The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Küppers, Günter and Lenhard, Johannes. 2006. “From Hierarchical to Network-like Integration: A Revolution of Modeling Style in Computer-Simulation.” In Simulation, 89–106. Springer. http://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/1-4020-5375-4_6.pdf.Google Scholar
Lenhard, Johannes and Winsberg, Eric. 2010. “Holism, Entrenchment, and the Future of Climate Model Pluralism.” Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 41 (3): 253–262.Google Scholar
Levins, Richard. 1966. “The Strategy of Model Building in Population Biology.” American Scientist 54 (4): 421–431.Google Scholar
Lloyd, Elisabeth A. 2009. “I – Elisabeth A. Lloyd: Varieties of Support and Confirmation of Climate Models.” In Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume 83: 213–232. Oxford University Press. http://aristoteliansupp.oxfordjournals.org/content/83/1/213.abstract.Google Scholar
Lloyd, Elisabeth A. 2010. “Confirmation and Robustness of Climate Models.” Philosophy of Science 77 (5): 971–984.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lloyd, Elisabeth A. 2012. “The Role of ‘Complex’ Empiricism in the Debates about Satellite Data and Climate Models.” Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 43 (2): 390–401. Reprinted in Climate Modeling: Philosophical and Conceptual Issues, edited by Lloyd, Elisabeth A. and Winsberg, Eric. 2018. Palgrave McMillan.Google Scholar
Lloyd, Elisabeth A. 2015. “Model Robustness as a Confirmatory Virtue: The Case of Climate Science.” Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 49: 58–68.Google Scholar
Lloyd, Elisabeth A. and Winsberg, Eric, eds. 2018. Climate Modeling: Philosophical and Conceptual Issues. London: Palgrave MacMillan.Google Scholar
Longino, Helen E. 1990. Science as Social Knowledge: Values and Objectivity in Scientific Inquiry. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Longino, Helen E. 1996. “Cognitive and Non-Cognitive Values in Science: Rethinking the Dichotomy.” In Feminism, Science, and the Philosophy of Science, 39–58. Springer. http://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-94-009-1742-2_3.Google Scholar
Machamer, Peter and Douglas, Heather. 1999. “Cognitive and Social Values.” Science & Education 8 (1): 45–54.Google Scholar
Mastrandrea, Michael D., Field, Christopher B., Stocker, Thomas F., Edenhofer, Ottmar, Ebi, Kristie L., Frame, David J., Held, Hermann et al. 2010. “Guidance Note for Lead Authors of the IPCC Fifth Assessment Report on Consistent Treatment of Uncertainties.” http://pubman.mpdl.mpg.de/pubman/item/escidoc:2147184/component/escidoc:2147185/uncertainty-guidance-note.pdf.Google Scholar
Mauritsen, Thorsten, Stevens, Bjorn, Roeckner, Erich, Crueger, Traute, Esch, Monika, Giorgetta, Marco, Haak, Helmuth et al. 2012. “Tuning the Climate of a Global Model.” Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems 4 (3). http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1029/2012MS000154/full.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McMullin, Ernan. 1982. “Values in Science.” In PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association, 1982: 3–28. Philosophy of Science Association. www.journals.uchicago.edu/doi/abs/10.1086/psaprocbienmeetp.1982.2.192409.Google Scholar
Mearns, Linda O., Bukovsky, Melissa S., Pryor, Sarah C. and Magaña, Victor. 2014. “Downscaling of Climate Information.” In Climate Change in North America, 201–250. Springer. http://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-319-03768-4_5. Reprinted in Climate Modeling: Philosophical and Conceptual Issues, edited by Lloyd, Elisabeth A. and Winsberg, Eric. 2018. Palgrave McMillan.Google Scholar
Miller, Boaz. 2013. “When Is Consensus Knowledge Based? Distinguishing Shared Knowledge from Mere Agreement.” Synthese 190: 1293–1316.Google Scholar
Morgan, Mary S. and Morrison, Margaret, eds. 1999. Models as Mediators: Perspectives on Natural and Social Science. N edition. Cambridge; New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Navas, Alejandro, Nabergall, Lukas and Winsberg, Eric. Forthcoming. “On the Proper Classification of Lepidoptera: Does the Absence of Structural Stability Produce a ‘Hawkmoth Effect’ That Undermines Climate Modeling?”Google Scholar
Neurath, Marie and Cohen, Robert S., eds. 1973. Otto Neurath: Empiricism and Sociology. 1973 edition. Dordrecht: D. Reidel Publishing Company.Google Scholar
Nordhaus, W. 2008. A Question of Balance: Weighing the Options on Global Warming Policies. New Haven; London: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Nuccitelli, Dana, Way, Robert, Painting, Rob, Church, John and Cook, John. 2012. “Comment on ‘Ocean Heat Content and Earth’s Radiation Imbalance. II. Relation to Climate Shifts.’” Physics Letters A 376 (45): 3466–3468. doi:10.1016/j.physleta.2012.10.010.Google Scholar
Oberkampf, William L. and Roy, Christopher J.. 2010. Verification and Validation in Scientific Computing. 1st edition. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Oreskes, Naomi. 2004. “The Scientific Consensus on Climate Change.” Science 306 (5702): 1686–1686.Google Scholar
Oreskes, Naomi. 2007. “The Scientific Consensus on Climate Change: How Do We Know We’re Not Wrong?” Climate Change: What It Means for Us, Our Children, and Our Grandchildren, 65–99. London: MIT Press. Reprinted in Climate Modeling: Philosophical and Conceptual Issues, edited by Lloyd, Elisabeth A. and Winsberg, Eric. 2018. Palgrave McMillan.Google Scholar
Oreskes, Naomi and Conway, Erik M.. 2010. Merchants of Doubt: How a Handful of Scientists Obscured the Truth on Issues from Tobacco Smoke to Global Warming. Sydney, Australia: Bloomsbury Publishing USA.Google Scholar
Orzack, Steven Hecht and Sober, Elliott. 1993. “A Critical Assessment of Levins’s the Strategy of Model Building in Population Biology (1966).” The Quarterly Review of Biology 68 (4): 533–546.Google Scholar
Palmer, T. N. 2001. “A Nonlinear Dynamical Perspective on Model Error: A Proposal for Non-Local Stochastic-Dynamic Parametrization in Weather and Climate Prediction Models.” Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society 127 (572): 279–304. doi:10.1002/qj.49712757202.Google Scholar
Parker, Wendy S. 2010a. “Predicting Weather and Climate: Uncertainty, Ensembles and Probability.” Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 41 (3): 263–272.Google Scholar
Parker, Wendy S. 2010b. “Scientific Models and Adequacy-for-Purpose.” The Modern Schoolman 87 (3/4): 285–293.Google Scholar
Parker, Wendy S. 2011. “When Climate Models Agree: The Significance of Robust Model Predictions.” Philosophy of Science 78 (4): 579–600. Reprinted in Climate Modeling: Philosophical and Conceptual Issues, edited by Lloyd, Elisabeth A. and Winsberg, Eric. 2018. Palgrave McMillan.Google Scholar
Parker, Wendy S. 2014. “Values and Uncertainties in Climate Prediction, Revisited.” Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 46: 24–30.Google Scholar
Peterson, Thomas C. 2003. “Assessment of Urban Versus Rural In Situ Surface Temperatures in the Contiguous United States: No Difference Found.” Journal of Climate 16 (18): 2941–2959. doi:10.1175/1520-0442(2003)016<2941:AOUVRI>2.0.CO;2.Google Scholar
Pirtle, Zachary, Meyer, Ryan and Hamilton, Andrew. 2010. “What Does It Mean When Climate Models Agree? A Case for Assessing Independence among General Circulation Models.” Environmental Science & Policy 13 (5): 351–361.Google Scholar
Pugh, Charles and Peixoto, Maurício Matos. 2008. “Structural Stability.” Scholarpedia 3 (9): 4008. doi:10.4249/scholarpedia.4008.Google Scholar
RealClimateGroup. 2009. “The CRU Hack.” RealClimate. www.realclimate.org/index.php/archives/2009/11/the-cru-hack/.Google Scholar
Reisch, George A. 2007. “From the ‘Life of the Present’ to the Icy Slopes of Logic”: Logical Empiricism, the Unity of Science Movement, and the Cold War.” In The Cambridge Companion to Logical Empiricism, edited by Richardson, A. and Uebel, T., 58–87. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Rosenberg, Stacy, Vedlitz, Arnold, Cowman, Deborah F. and Zahran, Sammy. 2010. “Climate Change: A Profile of US Climate Scientists’ Perspectives.” Climatic Change 101 (3): 311–329.Google Scholar
Rougier, Jonathan and Crucifix, Michel. 2018. “Uncertainty in Climate Science and Climate Policy.” In Climate Modeling: Philosophical and Conceptual Issues, edited by Lloyd, Elisabeth A. and Winsberg, Eric. London: Palgrave McMillan.Google Scholar
Roy, Christopher J. 2005. “Review of Code and Solution Verification Procedures for Computational Simulation.” Journal of Computational Physics 205 (1): 131–156.Google Scholar
Rudner, Richard. 1953. “The Scientist qua Scientist Makes Value Judgments.” Philosophy of Science 20 (1): 1–6.Google Scholar
Santer, B. D., Thorne, P. W., Haimberger, L., Taylor, K. E., Wigley, T. M. L., Lanzante, J. R., Solomon, S. et al. 2008. “Consistency of Modelled and Observed Temperature Trends in the Tropical Troposphere.” International Journal of Climatology 28 (13): 1703–22. doi:10.1002/joc.1756.Google Scholar
Schmidt, Gavin A. 2008. “Of Buckets and Blogs.” RealClimate. www.realclimate.org/index.php/archives/2008/06/of-buckets-and-blogs/.Google Scholar
Schmidt, Gavin A. 2015. “NOAA Temperature Record Updates and the ‘Hiatus’.” RealClimate. www.realclimate.org/index.php/archives/2015/06/noaa-temperature-record-updates-and-the-hiatus/.Google Scholar
Schmidt, Gavin A. and Sherwood, Steven. 2015. “A Practical Philosophy of Complex Climate Modelling.” European Journal for Philosophy of Science 5 (2): 149–169.Google Scholar
Schupbach, Jonah N. 2016. “Robustness Analysis as Explanatory Reasoning.” The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, axw008, https://doi.org/10.1093/bjps/axw008.Google Scholar
Schupbach, Jonah N. and Sprenger, Jan. 2011. “The Logic of Explanatory Power.” Philosophy of Science 78 (1): 105–127.Google Scholar
Shackley, Simon, Young, Peter, Parkinson, Stuart and Wynne, Brian. 1998. “Uncertainty, Complexity and Concepts of Good Science in Climate Change Modelling: Are GCMs the Best Tools?” Climatic Change 38 (2): 159–205. doi:10.1023/A:1005310109968.Google Scholar
Shewhart, Walter Andrew and Deming, William Edwards. 1939. Statistical Method from the Viewpoint of Quality Control. North Chelmsford, MA: Courier Corporation.Google Scholar
Slingo, Julia and Palmer, Tim. 2011. “Uncertainty in Weather and Climate Prediction.” Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A 369 (1956): 4751–4767.Google Scholar
Smith, Leonard A. 2002. “What Might We Learn from Climate Forecasts?” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 99 (suppl. 1): 2487–2492.Google Scholar
Smith, Peter. 1998. Explaining Chaos. Cambridge; New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Solomon, Miriam. 2001. “Social Empiricism.” MIT Press. https://mitpress.mit.edu/books/social-empiricism.Google Scholar
Steel, Daniel. 2010. “Epistemic Values and the Argument from Inductive Risk.” Philosophy of Science 77 (1): 14–34.Google Scholar
Steel, Daniel. 2015. “Acceptance, Values, and Probability.” Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 53: 81–88.Google Scholar
Steele, Katie and Werndl, Charlotte. 2013. “Climate Models, Calibration, and Confirmation.” The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 64 (3): 609–635.Google Scholar
Stegenga, Jacob. 2016. “Three Criteria for Consensus Conferences.” Foundations of Science 21 (1): 35–49.Google Scholar
Stenhouse, Neil, Maibach, Edward, Cobb, Sara, Ban, Ray, Bleistein, Andrea, Croft, Paul, Bierly, Eugene, Seitter, Keith, Rasmussen, Gary and Leiserowitz, Anthony. 2014. “Meteorologists’ Views about Global Warming: A Survey of American Meteorological Society Professional Members.” Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society 95 (7): 1029–1040.Google Scholar
Stern, N. H. 2007. The Economics of Climate Change: The Stern Review. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Stone, Dáithí A. and Knutti, Reto. 2010. “Weather and Climate.” In Modelling the Impact of Climate Change on Water Resources, edited by Fung, Fai, Lopez, Anaand New, Mark, 4–33. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. doi:10.1002/9781444324921.ch2.Google Scholar
Suárez, Mauricio. 2004. “An Inferential Conception of Scientific Representation.” Philosophy of Science 71 (5): 767–779.Google Scholar
Suppes, Patrick. 1969. “Models of Data.” In Studies in the Methodology and Foundations of Science, 24–35. Springer. http://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-94-017-3173-7_2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tebaldi, Claudia and Knutti, Reto. 2007. “The Use of the Multi-Model Ensemble in Probabilistic Climate Projections.” Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences 365 (1857): 2053–2075.Google ScholarPubMed
“The Paris Agreement – Main Page.” 2017. UNFCCC, accessed March 26. http://unfccc.int/paris_agreement/items/9485.php.Google Scholar
Thompson, Erica. 2013. “Modelling North Atlantic Storms in a Changing Climate.” http://spiral.imperial.ac.uk/handle/10044/1/14730.Google Scholar
Tol, Richard. 2002a. Estimates of the Damage Costs of Climate Change. Part 1: Benchmark Estimates, Environmental & Resource Economics 21 (1): 47–73. doi:10.1023/A:1014500930521Google Scholar
Tol, Richard. 2002b. Estimates of the Damage Costs of Climate Change, Part II. Dynamic Estimates. Environmental & Resource Economics 21: 135–160. doi:10.1023/A:1014539414591.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tucker, Aviezer. 2003. “The Epistemic Significance of Consensus.” Inquiry 46 (4): 501–521. doi:10.1080/00201740310003388.Google Scholar
Verheggen, Bart, Strengers, Bart, Cook, John, van Dorland, Rob, Vringer, Kees, Peters, Jeroen, Visser, Hans and Meyer, Leo. 2014. “Scientists’ Views about Attribution of Global Warming.” Environmental Science & Technology 48 (16): 8963–8971.Google Scholar
Weart, Spencer. 2010. “The Development of General Circulation Models of Climate.” Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 41 (3): 208–217.Google Scholar
Weisberg, Michael. 2006. “Robustness Analysis.” Philosophy of Science 73 (5): 730–742.Google Scholar
Wigley, T. M., Ramaswamy, V., Christy, J. R., Lanzante, J. R., Mears, C. A., Santer, B. D. and Folland, C. K.. 2006. “Temperature Trends in the Lower Atmosphere: Steps for Understanding and Reconciling Differences. Executive Summary.” US Climate Change Science Program, Synthesis and Assessment Product 2 (11): 1–53.Google Scholar
Wilholt, Torsten. 2009. “Bias and Values in Scientific Research.” Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 40 (1): 92–101.Google Scholar
Wilholt, Torsten. 2013. “Epistemic Trust in Science.” The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 64 (2): 233–253.Google Scholar
Wimsatt, W. C. 1994. “The Ontology of Complex Systems: Levels of Organization, Perspectives, and Causal Thickets.” In Wimsatt, W.C., eds. Re-engineering Philosophy for Limited Beings, 193–240. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Wimsatt, W. C. 2007. Re-Engineering Philosophy for Limited Beings: Piecewise Approximations to Reality. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Wimsatt, W. C. 2011. Robust Re-Engineering: A Philosophical Account? Springer. http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10539-011-9260-8/fulltext.html.Google Scholar
Winsberg, Eric. 2003. “Simulated Experiments: Methodology for a Virtual World.” Philosophy of Science 70 (1): 105–125.Google Scholar
Winsberg, Eric. 2006. “Handshaking Your Way to the Top: Simulation at the Nanoscale.” Philosophy of Science 73 (5): 582–594.Google Scholar
Winsberg, Eric. 2010. Science in the Age of Computer Simulation. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Winsberg, Eric. 2012. “Values and Uncertainties in the Predictions of Global Climate Models.” Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 22 (2): 111–137.Google Scholar
Winsberg, Eric. 2013. “Computer Simulations in Science.” Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. https://stanford.library.sydney.edu.au/entries/simulations-science/.Google Scholar
Winsberg, Eric and Goodwin, William Mark. 2016. “The Adventures of Climate Science in the Sweet Land of Idle Arguments.” Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 54: 9–17.Google Scholar
Winsberg, Eric, Huebner, Bryce and Kukla, Rebecca. 2014. “Accountability and Values in Radically Collaborative Research.” Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 46: 16–23.Google Scholar
Woodward, Jim. 2006. “Some Varieties of Robustness.” Journal of Economic Methodology 13 (2): 219–240.Google Scholar
Worrall, John. 2014. “Prediction and Accommodation Revisited.” Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 45 (March): 54–61. doi:10.1016/j.shpsa.2013.10.001.Google Scholar
Alexander, Kaitlin and Easterbrook, Stephen M.. 2015. “The Software Architecture of Climate Models: A Graphical Comparison of CMIP5 and EMICAR5 Configurations.” Geoscientific Model Development 8 (4): 1221–1232.Google Scholar
Allison, I., Bindoff, N. L., Bindschadler, R. A., Cox, P. M., De Noblet, N., England, M. H., Francis, J. E. et al. 2009. “The Copenhagen Diagnosis.” The University of New South Wales Climate Change Research Centre, Sydney: 1–60. www.researchgate.net/profile/E_Rignot/publication/51997579_The_Copenhagen_Diagnosis/links/00b7d5159bf09dd86b000000.pdf.Google Scholar
Barnes, Eric Christian. 2008. The Paradox of Predictivism. 1st edition. Cambridge; New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Biddle, Justin B. and Leuschner, Anna. 2015. “Climate Skepticism and the Manufacture of Doubt: Can Dissent in Science Be Epistemically Detrimental?” European Journal for Philosophy of Science 5 (3): 261–278.Google Scholar
Biddle, Justin and Winsberg, Eric. 2009. “Value Judgements and the Estimation of Uncertainty in Climate Modeling.” In Magnus, P.D. and Busch, J., eds. New Waves in Philosophy of Science, p. 172–197. London: Palgrave McMillan.Google Scholar
Bogen, James and Woodward, James. 1988. “Saving the Phenomena.” The Philosophical Review 97 (3): 303–352.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bovens, Luc and Hartmann, Stephan. 2003. Bayesian Epistemology. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Bradley, Richard and Steele, Katie. 2015. “Making Climate Decisions.” Philosophy Compass 10 (11): 799–810.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bradley, Seamus, Frigg, Roman, Du, Hailiang and Smith, Leonard A.. 2014. “Model Error and Ensemble Forecasting: A Cautionary Tale.” Scientific Explanation and Methodology of Science 1: 58–66.Google Scholar
Bray, Dennis. 2010. “The Scientific Consensus of Climate Change Revisited.” Environmental Science & Policy 13 (5): 340–350.Google Scholar
Bray, Dennis and von Storch, Hans. 2010. CliSci2008: A Survey of the Perspectives of Climate Scientists Concerning Climate Science and Climate Change. GKSS-Forschungszentrum Geesthacht Geesthacht. www.hvonstorch.de/klima/pdf/GKSS_2010_9.CLISCI.pdf.Google Scholar
Brook, Barry. 2008. “So Just Who Does Climate Science?” Brave New Climate. August 31. https://bravenewclimate.com/2008/08/31/so-just-who-does-climate-science/.Google Scholar
Broome, John. 2012. Climate Matters: Ethics in a Warming World. 1st edition. New York: W. W. Norton & Company.Google Scholar
Bump, Philip. 2015. “Jim Inhofe’s Snowball Has Disproven Climate Change Once and for All.” TheWashington Post, February 26, sec. The Fix. www.washingtonpost.com/news/the-fix/wp/2015/02/26/jim-inhofes-snowball-has-disproven-climate-change-once-and-for-all/.Google Scholar
Calcott, Brett. 2011. “Wimsatt and the Robustness Family: Review of Wimsatt’s Re-Engineering Philosophy for Limited Beings.” Biology & Philosophy 26 (2): 281–293.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carlton, J. S., Perry-Hill, Rebecca, Huber, Matthew and Prokopy, Linda S.. 2015. “The Climate Change Consensus Extends beyond Climate Scientists.” Environmental Research Letters 10 (9): 094025.Google Scholar
Chaboureau, Jean-Pierre and Bechtold, Peter. 2002. “A Simple Cloud Parameterization Derived from Cloud Resolving Model Data: Diagnostic and Prognostic Applications.” Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences 59 (15): 2362–2372. doi:10.1175/1520-0469(2002)059<2362:ASCPDF>2.0.CO;2.Google Scholar
Churchman, C. West. 1948. “Statistics, Pragmatics, Induction.” Philosophy of Science 15 (3): 249–268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Churchman, C. West. 1956. “Science and Decision Making.” Philosophy of Science 23 (3): 247–249.Google Scholar
Clark, Andy. 1998. Being There: Putting Brain, Body, and World Together Again. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Cohen, L. Jonathan. 1995. An Essay on Belief and Acceptance. Reprint edition. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Cook, John, Oreskes, Naomi, Doran, Peter T., Anderegg, William R.L., Verheggen, Bart, Maibach, Ed W., Stuart Carlton, J. et al. 2016. “Consensus on Consensus: A Synthesis of Consensus Estimates on Human-Caused Global Warming.” Environmental Research Letters 11 (4): 048002.Google Scholar
Daron, Joseph D. and Stainforth, David A.. 2013. “On Predicting Climate under Climate Change.” Environmental Research Letters 8 (3): 034021.Google Scholar
Doran, Peter T. and Zimmerman, Maggie Kendall. 2009. “Examining the Scientific Consensus on Climate Change.” Eos, Transactions American Geophysical Union 90 (3): 22–23.Google Scholar
Douglas, Heather. 2000. “Inductive Risk and Values in Science.” Philosophy of Science 67 (4): 559–579.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Douglas, Heather. 2005. “Inserting the Public into Science.” In Democratization of Expertise?, 153–169. Springer. http://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/1-4020-3754-6_9.pdf.Google Scholar
Douglas, Heather. 2009. Science, Policy, and the Value-Free Ideal. University of Pittsburgh Press.Google Scholar
Dunne, John. 2006. “Towards Earth System Modelling: Bringing GFDL to life,” in “‘The Australian Community Climate and Earth System Simulator (ACCESS) - challenges and opportunities’: extended abstracts of presentations at the eighteenth annual BMRC Modelling Workshop 28 November - 1 December 2006.” Hollis, A.J. and Kariko, A.P. (editors) downloaded from www.cawcr.gov.au/publications/BMRC_archive/researchreports/RR123.pdf, accessed August 12, 2014.Google Scholar
“Earth System Modeling Framework.” 2016. Wikipedia. https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Earth_System_Modeling_Framework&oldid=749938673.Google Scholar
Elliott, Kevin C. 2011. “Direct and Indirect Roles for Values in Science.” Philosophy of Science 78 (2): 303–324.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elliott, Kevin C. and McKaughan, Daniel J.. 2014. “Nonepistemic Values and the Multiple Goals of Science.” Philosophy of Science 81 (1): 1–21.Google Scholar
Elliott, Kevin C. and Resnik, David B.. 2014. “Science, Policy, and the Transparency of Values.” Environmental Health Perspectives (Online) 122 (7): 647.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Farnsworth, Stephen J. and Robert Lichter, S.. 2012. “The Structure of Scientific Opinion on Climate Change.” International Journal of Public Opinion Research 24 (1): 93–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fehr, Carla and Plaisance, Kathryn S.. 2010. “Socially Relevant Philosophy of Science: An Introduction.” Synthese 177 (3): 301–316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fraassen, Bas C. van. 2010. Scientific Representation: Paradoxes of Perspective. Reprint edition. Oxford; New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Frigg, Roman, Bradley, Seamus, Du, Hailiang and Smith, Leonard A.. 2014. “Laplace’s Demon and the Adventures of His Apprentices.” Philosophy of Science 81 (1): 31–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frigg, Roman, Bradley, Seamus, Machete, Reason L. and Smith, Leonard A.. 2013. “Probabilistic Forecasting: Why Model Imperfection Is a Poison Pill.” In New Challenges to Philosophy of Science, 479–491. Springer. http://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-94-007-5845-2_39.Google Scholar
Frigg, Roman and Hartmann, Stephan. 2012. “Models in Science.” Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2012/entries/models-science.Google Scholar
Frigg, Roman and Reiss, Julian. 2009. “The Philosophy of Simulation: Hot New Issues or Same Old Stew?” Synthese 169 (3): 593–613.Google Scholar
Frigg, Roman, Smith, Leonard A. and Stainforth, David A.. 2013. “The Myopia of Imperfect Climate Models: The Case of UKCP09.” Philosophy of Science 80 (5): 886–897.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frigg, Roman, Smith, Leonard A. and Stainforth, David A.. 2015. “An Assessment of the Foundational Assumptions in High-Resolution Climate Projections: The Case of UKCP09.” Synthese 192 (12): 3979–4008.Google Scholar
Frisch, Mathias. 2013. “Modeling Climate Policies: A Critical Look at Integrated Assessment Models.” Philosophy & Technology 26 (2): 117–137. Reprinted in Climate Modeling: Philosophical and Conceptual Issues, edited by Lloyd, Elisabeth A. and Winsberg, Eric. 2018. Palgrave McMillan.Google Scholar
Frisch, Mathias. 2015. “Predictivism and Old Evidence: A Critical Look at Climate Model Tuning.” European Journal for Philosophy of Science 5 (2): 171–190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frisch, Mathias. 2017. “Climate Policy in the Age of Trump.” Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 27 (S2): 87–106.Google Scholar
Gleckler, Peter J., Taylor, Karl E. and Doutriaux, Charles. 2008. “Performance Metrics for Climate Models.” Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres 113 (D6). http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1029/2007JD008972/full.Google Scholar
Golaz, Jean-Christophe, Horowitz, Larry W. and Levy, Hiram. 2013. “Cloud Tuning in a Coupled Climate Model: Impact on 20th Century Warming.” Geophysical Research Letters 40 (10): 2246–2251.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldman, Alvin and Blanchard, Thomas. 2016. “Social Epistemology.” In The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, edited by Zalta, Edward N., Winter 2016. Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2016/entries/epistemology-social/.Google Scholar
Goldman, Alvin I. 2001. “Experts: Which Ones Should You Trust?” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 63 (1): 85–110.Google Scholar
Goodwin, William M. 2015. “Global Climate Modeling as Applied Science.” Journal for General Philosophy of Science 46 (2): 339–350.Google Scholar
Gordon, Neil D. and Klein, Stephen A.. 2014. “Low-Cloud Optical Depth Feedback in Climate Models.” Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres 119 (10): 2013JD021052. doi:10.1002/2013JD021052.Google Scholar
Grier, David. 2005. When Computers Were Human. Princeton University Press. http://press.princeton.edu/titles/7999.html.Google Scholar
Hahn, Hans, Neurath, Otto and Carnap, Rudolf. 1929. The Scientific Conception of the World: The Vienna Circle.Google Scholar
Hájek, Alan. 2003. “Interpretations of Probability.” The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Citeseer. http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary?doi=10.1.1.125.8314.Google Scholar
Held, Isaac and Randall, David. 2011. “Point/Counterpoint.” IEEE Software 28 (6): 62–65.Google Scholar
Hoefer, Carl. 2007. “The Third Way on Objective Probability: A Sceptic’s Guide to Objective Chance.” Mind 116 (463): 549–596.Google Scholar
Hollingsworth, Barbara. 2015. “97% Climbs to 99.5%: Obama Increases Percentage of Scientists Who Agree on Climate Change.” CNS News, December 2. www.cnsnews.com/news/article/barbara-hollingsworth/obama-ups-climate-change-consensus-paris-995-scientists.Google Scholar
Howard, Don A. 2003. “Two Left Turns Make a Right: On the Curious Political Career of North American Philosophy of Science at Midcentury.” In Alan W. Richardson and Gary L. Hardcastle, eds. Logical Empiricism in North America, pp. 25–93. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Huebner, Bryce, Kukla, Rebecca and Winsberg, Eric. 2017. “Making an Author in Radically Collaborative Research.” In Thomas Boyer-Kassem, Conor Mayo-Wilson and Michael Weisberg, eds. Scientific Collaboration and Collective Knowledge, 95–116. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hume, David. 2011. An Enquiry Concerning Human Understanding. Hollywood, FL: Simon & Brown.Google Scholar
Intemann, Kristen. 2015. “Distinguishing between Legitimate and Illegitimate Values in Climate Modeling.” European Journal for Philosophy of Science 5 (2): 217–232.Google Scholar
Intemann, Kristen. 2017. “Who Needs Consensus Anyway? Addressing Manufactured Doubt and Increasing Public Trust in Climate Science.” Public Affairs Quarterly 31 (3): 189–208.Google Scholar
Jeffrey, Richard C. 1956. “Valuation and Acceptance of Scientific Hypotheses.” Philosophy of Science 23 (3): 237–246.Google Scholar
Kellert, Stephen H. 1993. In the Wake of Chaos: Unpredictable Order in Dynamical Systems. 1st edition. Chicago: University Of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Kitcher, Phillip. 1993. The Advancement of Science: Science without Legend, Objectivity without Illusions. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Klein, Stephen A. and Hall, Alex. 2015. “Emergent Constraints for Cloud Feedbacks.” Current Climate Change Reports 1 (4): 276–287.Google Scholar
Knight, Frank H. 2012. Risk, Uncertainty and Profit. North Chelmsford, MA: Courier Corporation.Google Scholar
Knutti, Reto. 2018. “Climate Model Confirmation: From Philosophy to Predicting Climate in the Real World.” In Climate Modeling: Philosophical and Conceptual Issues, edited by Lloyd, Elisabeth A. and Winsberg, Eric. London: Palgrave McMillan.Google Scholar
Knutti, Reto and Hegerl, Gabriele C.. 2008. “The Equilibrium Sensitivity of the Earth’s Temperature to Radiation Changes.” Nature Geoscience 1 (11): 735–743.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kourany, Janet A. 2003a. “A Philosophy of Science for the Twenty-First Century.” Philosophy of Science 70 (1): 1–14.Google Scholar
Kuhn, Thomas S. 2012. The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Küppers, Günter and Lenhard, Johannes. 2006. “From Hierarchical to Network-like Integration: A Revolution of Modeling Style in Computer-Simulation.” In Simulation, 89–106. Springer. http://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/1-4020-5375-4_6.pdf.Google Scholar
Lenhard, Johannes and Winsberg, Eric. 2010. “Holism, Entrenchment, and the Future of Climate Model Pluralism.” Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 41 (3): 253–262.Google Scholar
Levins, Richard. 1966. “The Strategy of Model Building in Population Biology.” American Scientist 54 (4): 421–431.Google Scholar
Lloyd, Elisabeth A. 2009. “I – Elisabeth A. Lloyd: Varieties of Support and Confirmation of Climate Models.” In Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume 83: 213–232. Oxford University Press. http://aristoteliansupp.oxfordjournals.org/content/83/1/213.abstract.Google Scholar
Lloyd, Elisabeth A. 2010. “Confirmation and Robustness of Climate Models.” Philosophy of Science 77 (5): 971–984.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lloyd, Elisabeth A. 2012. “The Role of ‘Complex’ Empiricism in the Debates about Satellite Data and Climate Models.” Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 43 (2): 390–401. Reprinted in Climate Modeling: Philosophical and Conceptual Issues, edited by Lloyd, Elisabeth A. and Winsberg, Eric. 2018. Palgrave McMillan.Google Scholar
Lloyd, Elisabeth A. 2015. “Model Robustness as a Confirmatory Virtue: The Case of Climate Science.” Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 49: 58–68.Google Scholar
Lloyd, Elisabeth A. and Winsberg, Eric, eds. 2018. Climate Modeling: Philosophical and Conceptual Issues. London: Palgrave MacMillan.Google Scholar
Longino, Helen E. 1990. Science as Social Knowledge: Values and Objectivity in Scientific Inquiry. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Longino, Helen E. 1996. “Cognitive and Non-Cognitive Values in Science: Rethinking the Dichotomy.” In Feminism, Science, and the Philosophy of Science, 39–58. Springer. http://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-94-009-1742-2_3.Google Scholar
Machamer, Peter and Douglas, Heather. 1999. “Cognitive and Social Values.” Science & Education 8 (1): 45–54.Google Scholar
Mastrandrea, Michael D., Field, Christopher B., Stocker, Thomas F., Edenhofer, Ottmar, Ebi, Kristie L., Frame, David J., Held, Hermann et al. 2010. “Guidance Note for Lead Authors of the IPCC Fifth Assessment Report on Consistent Treatment of Uncertainties.” http://pubman.mpdl.mpg.de/pubman/item/escidoc:2147184/component/escidoc:2147185/uncertainty-guidance-note.pdf.Google Scholar
Mauritsen, Thorsten, Stevens, Bjorn, Roeckner, Erich, Crueger, Traute, Esch, Monika, Giorgetta, Marco, Haak, Helmuth et al. 2012. “Tuning the Climate of a Global Model.” Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems 4 (3). http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1029/2012MS000154/full.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McMullin, Ernan. 1982. “Values in Science.” In PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association, 1982: 3–28. Philosophy of Science Association. www.journals.uchicago.edu/doi/abs/10.1086/psaprocbienmeetp.1982.2.192409.Google Scholar
Mearns, Linda O., Bukovsky, Melissa S., Pryor, Sarah C. and Magaña, Victor. 2014. “Downscaling of Climate Information.” In Climate Change in North America, 201–250. Springer. http://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-319-03768-4_5. Reprinted in Climate Modeling: Philosophical and Conceptual Issues, edited by Lloyd, Elisabeth A. and Winsberg, Eric. 2018. Palgrave McMillan.Google Scholar
Miller, Boaz. 2013. “When Is Consensus Knowledge Based? Distinguishing Shared Knowledge from Mere Agreement.” Synthese 190: 1293–1316.Google Scholar
Morgan, Mary S. and Morrison, Margaret, eds. 1999. Models as Mediators: Perspectives on Natural and Social Science. N edition. Cambridge; New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Navas, Alejandro, Nabergall, Lukas and Winsberg, Eric. Forthcoming. “On the Proper Classification of Lepidoptera: Does the Absence of Structural Stability Produce a ‘Hawkmoth Effect’ That Undermines Climate Modeling?”Google Scholar
Neurath, Marie and Cohen, Robert S., eds. 1973. Otto Neurath: Empiricism and Sociology. 1973 edition. Dordrecht: D. Reidel Publishing Company.Google Scholar
Nordhaus, W. 2008. A Question of Balance: Weighing the Options on Global Warming Policies. New Haven; London: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Nuccitelli, Dana, Way, Robert, Painting, Rob, Church, John and Cook, John. 2012. “Comment on ‘Ocean Heat Content and Earth’s Radiation Imbalance. II. Relation to Climate Shifts.’” Physics Letters A 376 (45): 3466–3468. doi:10.1016/j.physleta.2012.10.010.Google Scholar
Oberkampf, William L. and Roy, Christopher J.. 2010. Verification and Validation in Scientific Computing. 1st edition. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Oreskes, Naomi. 2004. “The Scientific Consensus on Climate Change.” Science 306 (5702): 1686–1686.Google Scholar
Oreskes, Naomi. 2007. “The Scientific Consensus on Climate Change: How Do We Know We’re Not Wrong?” Climate Change: What It Means for Us, Our Children, and Our Grandchildren, 65–99. London: MIT Press. Reprinted in Climate Modeling: Philosophical and Conceptual Issues, edited by Lloyd, Elisabeth A. and Winsberg, Eric. 2018. Palgrave McMillan.Google Scholar
Oreskes, Naomi and Conway, Erik M.. 2010. Merchants of Doubt: How a Handful of Scientists Obscured the Truth on Issues from Tobacco Smoke to Global Warming. Sydney, Australia: Bloomsbury Publishing USA.Google Scholar
Orzack, Steven Hecht and Sober, Elliott. 1993. “A Critical Assessment of Levins’s the Strategy of Model Building in Population Biology (1966).” The Quarterly Review of Biology 68 (4): 533–546.Google Scholar
Palmer, T. N. 2001. “A Nonlinear Dynamical Perspective on Model Error: A Proposal for Non-Local Stochastic-Dynamic Parametrization in Weather and Climate Prediction Models.” Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society 127 (572): 279–304. doi:10.1002/qj.49712757202.Google Scholar
Parker, Wendy S. 2010a. “Predicting Weather and Climate: Uncertainty, Ensembles and Probability.” Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 41 (3): 263–272.Google Scholar
Parker, Wendy S. 2010b. “Scientific Models and Adequacy-for-Purpose.” The Modern Schoolman 87 (3/4): 285–293.Google Scholar
Parker, Wendy S. 2011. “When Climate Models Agree: The Significance of Robust Model Predictions.” Philosophy of Science 78 (4): 579–600. Reprinted in Climate Modeling: Philosophical and Conceptual Issues, edited by Lloyd, Elisabeth A. and Winsberg, Eric. 2018. Palgrave McMillan.Google Scholar
Parker, Wendy S. 2014. “Values and Uncertainties in Climate Prediction, Revisited.” Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 46: 24–30.Google Scholar
Peterson, Thomas C. 2003. “Assessment of Urban Versus Rural In Situ Surface Temperatures in the Contiguous United States: No Difference Found.” Journal of Climate 16 (18): 2941–2959. doi:10.1175/1520-0442(2003)016<2941:AOUVRI>2.0.CO;2.Google Scholar
Pirtle, Zachary, Meyer, Ryan and Hamilton, Andrew. 2010. “What Does It Mean When Climate Models Agree? A Case for Assessing Independence among General Circulation Models.” Environmental Science & Policy 13 (5): 351–361.Google Scholar
Pugh, Charles and Peixoto, Maurício Matos. 2008. “Structural Stability.” Scholarpedia 3 (9): 4008. doi:10.4249/scholarpedia.4008.Google Scholar
RealClimateGroup. 2009. “The CRU Hack.” RealClimate. www.realclimate.org/index.php/archives/2009/11/the-cru-hack/.Google Scholar
Reisch, George A. 2007. “From the ‘Life of the Present’ to the Icy Slopes of Logic”: Logical Empiricism, the Unity of Science Movement, and the Cold War.” In The Cambridge Companion to Logical Empiricism, edited by Richardson, A. and Uebel, T., 58–87. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Rosenberg, Stacy, Vedlitz, Arnold, Cowman, Deborah F. and Zahran, Sammy. 2010. “Climate Change: A Profile of US Climate Scientists’ Perspectives.” Climatic Change 101 (3): 311–329.Google Scholar
Rougier, Jonathan and Crucifix, Michel. 2018. “Uncertainty in Climate Science and Climate Policy.” In Climate Modeling: Philosophical and Conceptual Issues, edited by Lloyd, Elisabeth A. and Winsberg, Eric. London: Palgrave McMillan.Google Scholar
Roy, Christopher J. 2005. “Review of Code and Solution Verification Procedures for Computational Simulation.” Journal of Computational Physics 205 (1): 131–156.Google Scholar
Rudner, Richard. 1953. “The Scientist qua Scientist Makes Value Judgments.” Philosophy of Science 20 (1): 1–6.Google Scholar
Santer, B. D., Thorne, P. W., Haimberger, L., Taylor, K. E., Wigley, T. M. L., Lanzante, J. R., Solomon, S. et al. 2008. “Consistency of Modelled and Observed Temperature Trends in the Tropical Troposphere.” International Journal of Climatology 28 (13): 1703–22. doi:10.1002/joc.1756.Google Scholar
Schmidt, Gavin A. 2008. “Of Buckets and Blogs.” RealClimate. www.realclimate.org/index.php/archives/2008/06/of-buckets-and-blogs/.Google Scholar
Schmidt, Gavin A. 2015. “NOAA Temperature Record Updates and the ‘Hiatus’.” RealClimate. www.realclimate.org/index.php/archives/2015/06/noaa-temperature-record-updates-and-the-hiatus/.Google Scholar
Schmidt, Gavin A. and Sherwood, Steven. 2015. “A Practical Philosophy of Complex Climate Modelling.” European Journal for Philosophy of Science 5 (2): 149–169.Google Scholar
Schupbach, Jonah N. 2016. “Robustness Analysis as Explanatory Reasoning.” The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, axw008, https://doi.org/10.1093/bjps/axw008.Google Scholar
Schupbach, Jonah N. and Sprenger, Jan. 2011. “The Logic of Explanatory Power.” Philosophy of Science 78 (1): 105–127.Google Scholar
Shackley, Simon, Young, Peter, Parkinson, Stuart and Wynne, Brian. 1998. “Uncertainty, Complexity and Concepts of Good Science in Climate Change Modelling: Are GCMs the Best Tools?” Climatic Change 38 (2): 159–205. doi:10.1023/A:1005310109968.Google Scholar
Shewhart, Walter Andrew and Deming, William Edwards. 1939. Statistical Method from the Viewpoint of Quality Control. North Chelmsford, MA: Courier Corporation.Google Scholar
Slingo, Julia and Palmer, Tim. 2011. “Uncertainty in Weather and Climate Prediction.” Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A 369 (1956): 4751–4767.Google Scholar
Smith, Leonard A. 2002. “What Might We Learn from Climate Forecasts?” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 99 (suppl. 1): 2487–2492.Google Scholar
Smith, Peter. 1998. Explaining Chaos. Cambridge; New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Solomon, Miriam. 2001. “Social Empiricism.” MIT Press. https://mitpress.mit.edu/books/social-empiricism.Google Scholar
Steel, Daniel. 2010. “Epistemic Values and the Argument from Inductive Risk.” Philosophy of Science 77 (1): 14–34.Google Scholar
Steel, Daniel. 2015. “Acceptance, Values, and Probability.” Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 53: 81–88.Google Scholar
Steele, Katie and Werndl, Charlotte. 2013. “Climate Models, Calibration, and Confirmation.” The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 64 (3): 609–635.Google Scholar
Stegenga, Jacob. 2016. “Three Criteria for Consensus Conferences.” Foundations of Science 21 (1): 35–49.Google Scholar
Stenhouse, Neil, Maibach, Edward, Cobb, Sara, Ban, Ray, Bleistein, Andrea, Croft, Paul, Bierly, Eugene, Seitter, Keith, Rasmussen, Gary and Leiserowitz, Anthony. 2014. “Meteorologists’ Views about Global Warming: A Survey of American Meteorological Society Professional Members.” Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society 95 (7): 1029–1040.Google Scholar
Stern, N. H. 2007. The Economics of Climate Change: The Stern Review. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Stone, Dáithí A. and Knutti, Reto. 2010. “Weather and Climate.” In Modelling the Impact of Climate Change on Water Resources, edited by Fung, Fai, Lopez, Anaand New, Mark, 4–33. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. doi:10.1002/9781444324921.ch2.Google Scholar
Suárez, Mauricio. 2004. “An Inferential Conception of Scientific Representation.” Philosophy of Science 71 (5): 767–779.Google Scholar
Suppes, Patrick. 1969. “Models of Data.” In Studies in the Methodology and Foundations of Science, 24–35. Springer. http://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-94-017-3173-7_2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tebaldi, Claudia and Knutti, Reto. 2007. “The Use of the Multi-Model Ensemble in Probabilistic Climate Projections.” Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences 365 (1857): 2053–2075.Google ScholarPubMed
“The Paris Agreement – Main Page.” 2017. UNFCCC, accessed March 26. http://unfccc.int/paris_agreement/items/9485.php.Google Scholar
Thompson, Erica. 2013. “Modelling North Atlantic Storms in a Changing Climate.” http://spiral.imperial.ac.uk/handle/10044/1/14730.Google Scholar
Tol, Richard. 2002a. Estimates of the Damage Costs of Climate Change. Part 1: Benchmark Estimates, Environmental & Resource Economics 21 (1): 47–73. doi:10.1023/A:1014500930521Google Scholar
Tol, Richard. 2002b. Estimates of the Damage Costs of Climate Change, Part II. Dynamic Estimates. Environmental & Resource Economics 21: 135–160. doi:10.1023/A:1014539414591.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tucker, Aviezer. 2003. “The Epistemic Significance of Consensus.” Inquiry 46 (4): 501–521. doi:10.1080/00201740310003388.Google Scholar
Verheggen, Bart, Strengers, Bart, Cook, John, van Dorland, Rob, Vringer, Kees, Peters, Jeroen, Visser, Hans and Meyer, Leo. 2014. “Scientists’ Views about Attribution of Global Warming.” Environmental Science & Technology 48 (16): 8963–8971.Google Scholar
Weart, Spencer. 2010. “The Development of General Circulation Models of Climate.” Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 41 (3): 208–217.Google Scholar
Weisberg, Michael. 2006. “Robustness Analysis.” Philosophy of Science 73 (5): 730–742.Google Scholar
Wigley, T. M., Ramaswamy, V., Christy, J. R., Lanzante, J. R., Mears, C. A., Santer, B. D. and Folland, C. K.. 2006. “Temperature Trends in the Lower Atmosphere: Steps for Understanding and Reconciling Differences. Executive Summary.” US Climate Change Science Program, Synthesis and Assessment Product 2 (11): 1–53.Google Scholar
Wilholt, Torsten. 2009. “Bias and Values in Scientific Research.” Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 40 (1): 92–101.Google Scholar
Wilholt, Torsten. 2013. “Epistemic Trust in Science.” The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 64 (2): 233–253.Google Scholar
Wimsatt, W. C. 1994. “The Ontology of Complex Systems: Levels of Organization, Perspectives, and Causal Thickets.” In Wimsatt, W.C., eds. Re-engineering Philosophy for Limited Beings, 193–240. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Wimsatt, W. C. 2007. Re-Engineering Philosophy for Limited Beings: Piecewise Approximations to Reality. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Wimsatt, W. C. 2011. Robust Re-Engineering: A Philosophical Account? Springer. http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10539-011-9260-8/fulltext.html.Google Scholar
Winsberg, Eric. 2003. “Simulated Experiments: Methodology for a Virtual World.” Philosophy of Science 70 (1): 105–125.Google Scholar
Winsberg, Eric. 2006. “Handshaking Your Way to the Top: Simulation at the Nanoscale.” Philosophy of Science 73 (5): 582–594.Google Scholar
Winsberg, Eric. 2010. Science in the Age of Computer Simulation. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Winsberg, Eric. 2012. “Values and Uncertainties in the Predictions of Global Climate Models.” Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 22 (2): 111–137.Google Scholar
Winsberg, Eric. 2013. “Computer Simulations in Science.” Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. https://stanford.library.sydney.edu.au/entries/simulations-science/.Google Scholar
Winsberg, Eric and Goodwin, William Mark. 2016. “The Adventures of Climate Science in the Sweet Land of Idle Arguments.” Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 54: 9–17.Google Scholar
Winsberg, Eric, Huebner, Bryce and Kukla, Rebecca. 2014. “Accountability and Values in Radically Collaborative Research.” Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 46: 16–23.Google Scholar
Woodward, Jim. 2006. “Some Varieties of Robustness.” Journal of Economic Methodology 13 (2): 219–240.Google Scholar
Worrall, John. 2014. “Prediction and Accommodation Revisited.” Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 45 (March): 54–61. doi:10.1016/j.shpsa.2013.10.001.Google Scholar