Bibliography

Katalin Makkai

doi:10.1017/9781108596893.007

Bibliography

Published online by Cambridge University Press: 07 April 2021

Katalin Makkai

Show author details

Katalin Makkai: Affiliation:
Bard College, Berlin

Book contents

Get access

Summary

A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'

Type: Chapter
Information: Kant's Critique of Taste
The Feeling of Life
, pp. 196 - 203

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108596893.007 [Opens in a new window]

Publisher: Cambridge University Press

Print publication year: 2021

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Primary Sources

Kant, Immanuel. Kants gesammelte Schriften, Akademie Ausgabe. Berlin: de Gruyter, 1902–.Google Scholar

Kant, Immanuel. Kritik der reinen Vernunft, edited by Schmidt, Raymund. Hamburg: Felix Meiner, 1990.Google Scholar

Kant, Immanuel. Kritik der Urteilskraft, edited by Vorländer, Karl. Hamburg: Felix Meiner, 1990.Google Scholar

Secondary Sources

Kant, Immanuel. “An Answer to the Question: ‘What Is Enlightenment?’” In Kant: Political Writings, edited by Reiss, Hans. Translated by Nisbet, H. B.. Second, enlarged edition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1991.Google Scholar

Kant, Immanuel. Anthropology from a Pragmatic Point of View. Edited and translated by Louden, Robert B.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006.Google Scholar

Kant, Immanuel. Critique of the Power of Judgment, edited by Guyer, Paul. Translated by Guyer, Paul and Matthews, Eric. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000.Google Scholar

Kant, Immanuel. Critique of Practical Reason. Translated by Gregor, Mary. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2015.Google Scholar

Kant, Immanuel. Critique of Pure Reason. Edited and translated by Guyer, Paul and Wood, Allen. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998.CrossRef Google Scholar

Kant, Immanuel. The Dohna-Wundlacken Logic. In Lectures on Logic, edited and translated by Michael Young, J.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1992.Google Scholar

Kant, Immanuel. Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals. Edited and translated by Gregor, Mary and Timmermann, Jens. Revised edition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2012.Google Scholar

Kant, Immanuel. The Jäsche Logic. In Lectures on Logic, edited and translated by Michael Young, J.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1992.Google Scholar

Kant, Immanuel. Lectures on Anthropology, edited by Wood, Allen W. and Louden, Robert B.. Translated by Clewis, Robert R., Louden, Robert B., Munzel, G. Felicitas, and Wood, Allen W.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2012.Google Scholar

Kant, Immanuel. Prolegomena to Any Future Metaphysics. Edited and translated by Hatfield, Gary. Second edition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004.Google Scholar

Kant, Immanuel. Theoretical Philosophy 1755–1771, translated by Walford, David. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1992.Google Scholar

Kant, Immanuel. “What Is Orientation in Thinking?” In Kant: Political Writings, edited by Reiss, Hans. Translated by Nisbet, H. B.. Second, enlarged edition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1991.Google Scholar

Kant, Immanuel. Analytic of the Beautiful from the Critique of Judgment. Translated by Cerf, Walter. Indianapolis: Bobbs-Merrill, 1963.Google Scholar

Kant, Immanuel. Anthropology from a Pragmatic Point of View. Translated by Dowdell, Victor Lyle, revised and edited by Rudnick, Hans H.. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press, 1978.Google Scholar

Kant, Immanuel. Critique de la faculté de juger. Translated by Philonenko, A.. Paris: Librairie Philosophique J. Vrin, 1968.Google Scholar

Kant, Immanuel. Critique de la faculté de juger. Translated by Renaut, Alain. Paris: Flammarion, 2000.Google Scholar

Kant, Immanuel. Critique of Judgment. Translated by Bernard, J. H.. Second edition, revised. London: Macmillan, 1914.Google Scholar

Kant, Immanuel. The Critique of Judgment. Translated by Meredith, James Creed. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1952.Google Scholar

Kant, Immanuel. The Critique of Judgment. Translated by Meredith, James Creed, revised and edited by Walker, Nicholas. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009.Google Scholar

Kant, Immanuel. Critique of Judgment Including the First Introduction. Translated by Pluhar, Werner S.. Indianapolis: Hackett, 1987.Google Scholar

Kant, Immanuel. Critique of Pure Reason. Translated by Smith, Norman Kemp. New York: St. Martin’s Press, 1965.Google Scholar

Abrams, M. H. “Art-as-Such: The Sociology of Modern Aesthetics.” In Doing Things with Texts: Essays in Criticism and Critical Theory, edited by Fischer, Michael. New York: W. W. Norton, 1991.Google Scholar

Abrams, M. H. “Kant and the Theology of Art,” Notre Dame English Journal 13, no. 3 (1981).Google Scholar

Adelung, Johann Christoph. Grammatisch-kritisches Wörterbuch der hochdeutschen Mundart. Vienna: Bauer, 1811. www.digitale-sammlungen.de.Google Scholar

Allison, Henry. Kant’s Theory of Taste: A Reading of the Critique of Aesthetic Judgment. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001.CrossRef Google Scholar

Allison, Henry. Kant’s Transcendental Idealism: An Interpretation and Defense. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1983.Google Scholar

Allison, Henry. “Pleasure and Harmony in Kant’s Theory of Taste: A Critique of the Causal Reading.” In Kants Ästhetik/Kant’s Aesthetics/L’esthétique de Kant, edited by Parret, Herman. Berlin: de Gruyter, 1998.Google Scholar

Ameriks, Karl. “How to Save Kant’s Deduction of Taste as Objective.” In Interpreting Kant’s Critiques. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2003.Google Scholar

Ameriks, Karl. “New Views on Kant’s Judgment of Taste.” In Interpreting Kant’s Critiques. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2003.Google Scholar

Ameriks, Karl. “Taste, Conceptuality, and Objectivity.” In Interpreting Kant’s Critiques. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2003.Google Scholar

Arendt, Hannah. “The Crisis in Culture: Its Social and Political Significance.” In Between Past and Future: Eight Exercises in Political Thought. New York: Viking Press, 1968.Google Scholar

Arendt, Hannah. Eichmann in Jerusalem: A Report on the Banality of Evil. Revised and enlarged edition. New York: Viking Press, 1965.Google Scholar

Arendt, Hannah. Lectures on Kant’s Political Philosophy, edited by Beiner, Ronald. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1982.Google Scholar

Austin, J. L. How to Do Things with Words, edited by Urmson, J. O. and Sbisà, Marina. Second edition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1975.Google Scholar

Austin, J. L. “Other Minds.” In Philosophical Papers, edited by Urmson, J. O. and Warnock, G. J.. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1979.Google Scholar

Bell, David. “The Art of Judgement,” Mind 96 (1987).Google Scholar

Bernstein, Jay. “Aesthetics, Modernism, Literature: Cavell’s Transformations of Philosophy.” In Stanley Cavell, edited by Eldridge, Richard. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003.Google Scholar

Bernstein, Jay. The Fate of Art: Aesthetic Alienation from Kant to Derrida and Adorno. University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press, 1992.Google Scholar

Blackburn, Simon. Essays in Quasi-Realism. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1993.Google Scholar

Blackburn, Simon. Spreading the Word: Groundings in the Philosophy of Language. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1984.Google Scholar

Cavell, Stanley. “Aesthetic Problems of Modern Philosophy.” In Must We Mean What We Say? A Book of Essays. Updated edition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002.Google Scholar

Cavell, Stanley. “The Argument of the Ordinary: Scenes of Instruction in Wittgenstein and in Kripke.” In Conditions Handsome and Unhandsome: The Constitution of Emersonian Perfectionism. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1990.Google Scholar

Cavell, Stanley. “The Avoidance of Love.” In Must We Mean What We Say? A Book of Essays. Updated edition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002.Google Scholar

Cavell, Stanley. The Claim of Reason: Wittgenstein, Skepticism, Morality, and Tragedy. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1979.Google Scholar

Cavell, Stanley. “Music Discomposed.” In Must We Mean What We Say? A Book of Essays. Updated edition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002.Google Scholar

Cavell, Stanley. Philosophy the Day after Tomorrow. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2005.Google Scholar

Cavell, Stanley. Pursuits of Happiness: The Hollywood Comedy of Remarriage. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1981.Google Scholar

Cervantes, Miguel de. Don Quixote. Translated by Grossman, Edith. Vintage: London, 2005.Google Scholar

Chaouli, Michel. Thinking with Kant’s Critique of Judgment. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2017.Google Scholar

Costello, Diarmuid. “Greenberg’s Kant and the Fate of Aesthetics in Contemporary Art Theory,” Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 65, no. 2 (2007).CrossRef Google Scholar

Costelloe, Timothy M. “Hume’s Aesthetics: The Literature and Directions for Research,” Hume Studies 30, no. 1 (2004).Google Scholar

Crawford, Donald W. Kant’s Aesthetic Theory. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press, 1974.Google Scholar

Crowther, Paul. “The Significance of Kant’s Pure Aesthetic Judgment,” British Journal of Aesthetics 36 (1996).Google Scholar

Dahlstrom, Daniel. “The Critique of Pure Reason and Continental Philosophy: Heidegger’s Interpretation of Transcendental Imagination.” In The Cambridge Companion to Kant’s Critique of Pure Reason, edited by Guyer, Paul. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2010.Google Scholar

Danto, Arthur. “The Future of Aesthetics.” In Rediscovering Aesthetics: Transdisciplinary Voices from Art History, Philosophy, and Art Practice, edited by Halsall, Francis, Jansen, Julia, and O’Connor, Tony. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 2009.Google Scholar

Danto, Arthur. What Art Is. New Haven: Yale University Press, 2014.Google Scholar

Derrida, Jacques. The Truth in Painting. Translated by Bennington, Geoff and McLeod, Ian. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1987.Google Scholar

Dreyfus, Hubert L., and Dreyfus, Stuart E.. “What Is Moral Maturity? Towards a Phenomenology of Ethical Expertise.” In Revisioning Philosophy, edited by Ogilvy, James. Albany: SUNY Press, 1992.Google Scholar

Elliott, R. K. “The Unity of Kant’s ‘Critique of Aesthetic Judgement’,” British Journal of Aesthetics 8 (1968).Google Scholar

Elkins, James. Introduction to Beyond the Aesthetic and the Anti-Aesthetic, edited by Elkins, James and Montgomery, Harper. University Park: Pennsylvania University Press, 2013.Google Scholar

Fleischacker, Samuel. A Third Concept of Liberty: Judgment and Freedom in Kant and Adam Smith. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1999.Google Scholar

Floyd, Juliet. “The Fact of Judgment: The Kantian Response to the Humean Condition.” In From Kant to Davidson: Philosophy and the Idea of the Transcendental, edited by Malpas, Jeff. London: Routledge, 2003.Google Scholar

Floyd, Juliet. “Heautonomy: Kant on Reflective Judgment and Systematicity.” In Kants Ästhetik/Kant’s Aesthetics/L’esthétique de Kant, edited by Parret, Herman. Berlin: de Gruyter, 1998.Google Scholar

Foot, Philippa. “Morality and Art.” In Moral Dilemmas. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 2003.Google Scholar

Frankfurt, Harry. The Importance of What We Care About. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1988.Google Scholar

Frankfurt, Harry. Necessity, Volition, and Love. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2008.Google Scholar

Fried, Michael. “An Introduction to My Art Criticism.” In Art and Objecthood: Essays and Reviews. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1998.Google Scholar

Fried, Michael. “Three American Painters.” In Art and Objecthood: Essays and Reviews. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1998.Google Scholar

Gardner, Sebastian. “Kant’s Third Critique: The Project of Unification,” Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplements 78 (2016).Google Scholar

Gasché, Rodolphe. The Idea of Form: Rethinking Kant’s Aesthetics. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 2003.Google Scholar

Ginsborg, Hannah. “Kant on the Subjectivity of Taste.” In Kants Ästhetik/Kant’s Aesthetics/L’esthétique de Kant, edited by Parret, Herman. Berlin: de Gruyter, 1998. Reprinted in Ginsborg, The Normativity of Nature: Essays on Kant’s Critique of Judgement.Google Scholar

Ginsborg, Hannah. “Kant’s Aesthetics and Teleology.” In Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, edited by Zalta, Edward N.. Fall 2014 edition. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2014/entries/kant-aesthetics/.Google Scholar

Ginsborg, Hannah. “Lawfulness without a Law: Kant on the Free Play of Imagination and Understanding,” Philosophical Topics 25, no. 1 (1997). Reprinted in Ginsborg, The Normativity of Nature: Essays on Kant’s Critique of Judgement.CrossRef Google Scholar

Ginsborg, Hannah. The Normativity of Nature: Essays on Kant’s Critique of Judgement. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2015.Google Scholar

Ginsborg, Hannah. “On the Key to Kant’s Critique of Taste,” Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 72 (1991). Reprinted in Ginsborg, The Normativity of Nature: Essays on Kant’s Critique of Judgement.Google Scholar

Ginsborg, Hannah. “The Pleasure of Judgement: Kant and the Possibility of Taste.” In The Normativity of Nature: Essays on Kant’s Critique of Judgement.Google Scholar

Ginsborg, Hannah. “Reflective Judgment and Taste,” Noûs 24 (1990). Reprinted in Ginsborg, The Normativity of Nature: Essays on Kant’s Critique of Judgement.Google Scholar

Ginsborg, Hannah. The Role of Taste in Kant’s Theory of Cognition. New York: Garland, 1990.Google Scholar

Gorodeisky, Keren. “Schematizing without a Concept? Imagine that!,” Proceedings of the European Society for Aesthetics 2 (2010).Google Scholar

Gorodeisky, Keren and Marcus, Eric. “Aesthetic Rationality,” Journal of Philosophy 115, no. 3 (2018).Google Scholar

Gracyk, Theodore. “Hume’s Aesthetics.” In Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, edited by Zalta, Edward N.. Summer 2016 edition. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2016/entries/hume-aesthetics/.Google Scholar

Grimm, Jacob and Wilhelm, Grimm. Deutsches Wörterbuch. Leipzig: S. Hirzel, 1854–1961. www.woerterbuchnetz.de/DWB.Google Scholar

Groves, Rebecca M. “On Performance and the Dramaturgy of Caring.” In Inter Views in Performance Philosophy: Crossings and Conversations, edited by Street, Anna, Alliot, Julien, and Pauker, Magnolia. London: Palgrave Macmillan, 2017.Google Scholar

Guyer, Paul. “The Harmony of the Faculties Revisited.” In Aesthetics and Cognition in Kant’s Critical Philosophy, edited by Kukla, Rebecca. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006.Google Scholar

Guyer, Paul. Kant and the Claims of Taste. Second edition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1997.Google Scholar

Guyer, Paul. “The Origins of Modern Aesthetics: 1711–1735.” In Values of Beauty: Historical Essays in Aesthetics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2005.Google Scholar

Hanna, Robert. “Kant’s Theory of Judgment.” In Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, edited by Zalta, Edward N.. Winter 2018 edition. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2018/entries/kant-judgment/.Google Scholar

Heidegger, Martin. Nietzsche I. Gesamtausgabe, division I, volume 6.1. Frankfurt am Main: Klostermann, 1996.Google Scholar

Heidegger, Martin. Nietzsche: Volumes One and Two. Translated by Krell, David Farrell. New York: Harper Collins, 1991.Google Scholar

Heidegger, Martin. “The Origin of the Work of Art.” In Poetry, Language, Thought. Translated by Hofstadter, Albert. New York: Harper Collins, 2013.Google Scholar

Heidegger, Martin. Phenomenological Interpretation of Kant’s Critique of Pure Reason. Translated by Emad, Parvis and Maly, Kenneth. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1997.Google Scholar

Henrich, Dieter. Aesthetic Judgment and the Moral Image of the World. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1992.Google Scholar

Henrich, Dieter. “Kant’s Notion of a Deduction and the Methodological Background of the First Critique.” In Kant’s Transcendental Deductions: The Three ‘Critiques’ and the ‘Opus postumum,’ edited by Förster, Eckart. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1989.Google Scholar

Hopkins, Robert. “How to Be a Pessimist about Aesthetic Testimony,” Journal of Philosophy 108, no. 3 (2011).Google Scholar

Hopkins, Robert. “Kant, Quasi-Realism, and the Autonomy of Aesthetic Judgement,” European Journal of Philosophy 9 (2001).Google Scholar

Hughes, Fiona, Kant’s Aesthetic Epistemology. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 2007.Google Scholar

Hughes, Fiona, Kant’s Critique of Aesthetic Judgement. London: Continuum, 2010.Google Scholar

Hughes, Fiona, “On Aesthetic Judgment and Our Relation to Nature: Kant’s Concept of Purposiveness,” Inquiry 49 (2006).Google Scholar

Hume, David. “Of the Standard of Taste.” In Essays Moral, Political, and Literary, edited by Miller, Eugene F.. Revised edition. Indianapolis: Liberty Fund, 1985.Google Scholar

Isenberg, Arnold. “Critical Communication.” In Aesthetics and the Theory of Criticism: Selected Essays of Arnold Isenberg, edited by Callaghan, W., Cauman, Leigh, Hempel, Carl, et al. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1973.Google Scholar

Janaway, Christopher. Images of Excellence: Plato’s Critique of the Arts. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1995.Google Scholar

Kalar, Brent. The Demands of Taste in Kant’s Aesthetics. New York: Continuum, 2006.Google Scholar

Korsgaard, Christine. The Sources of Normativity, edited by O’Neill, Onora. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996.Google Scholar

Kripke, Saul A. Wittgenstein on Rules and Private Language: An Elementary Exposition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1982.Google Scholar

Kukla, Rebecca. “Placing the Aesthetic in Kant’s Critical Epistemology,” Introduction to Aesthetics and Cognition in Kant’s Critical Philosophy, edited by Kukla, Rebecca. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006.Google Scholar

Kulenkampff, Jens. Kants Logik des ästhetischen Urteils. Frankfurt am Main: Klostermann, 1978.Google Scholar

Kulenkampff, Jens. “The Objectivity of Taste: Hume and Kant,” Noûs 24, no. 1 (1990).Google Scholar

Little, Margaret. “Moral Generalities Revisited.” In Moral Particularism, edited by Hooker, B. and Little, M.. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 2000.Google Scholar

Longuenesse, Béatrice. Kant and the Capacity to Judge: Sensibility and Discursivity in the Transcendental Analytic of the Critique of Pure Reason. Translated by Wolfe, Charles T.. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1998.Google Scholar

Mackie, J. L. Ethics: Inventing Right and Wrong. Harmondsworth: Penguin, 1977.Google Scholar

Makkai, Katalin. “Kant on Recognizing Beauty,” European Journal of Philosophy 18, no. 3 (2010).Google Scholar

Makkreel, Rudolf. Imagination and Interpretation in Kant: The Hermeneutical Import of the Critique of Judgment. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1990.Google Scholar

McCloskey, Mary. Kant’s Aesthetic. Albany: SUNY Press, 1987.Google Scholar

McDowell, John. “Aesthetic Value, Objectivity, and the Fabric of the World.” In Mind, Value, and Reality. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1998.Google Scholar

McDowell, John. “Values and Secondary Qualities.” In Mind, Value, and Reality. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1998.Google Scholar

McDowell, John. “Virtue and Reason.” In Mind, Value, and Reality. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1998.Google Scholar

Merleau-Ponty, Maurice. The World of Perception. Translated by Davis, Oliver. London: Routledge, 2004.Google Scholar

Mitchell, W. J. T. What Do Pictures Want? The Lives and Loves of Images. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2005.Google Scholar

Moran, Richard. “Frankfurt on Identification: Ambiguities of Activity in Mental Life.” In Contours of Agency: Essays on Themes from Harry Frankfurt, edited by Buss, Sarah and Overton, Lee. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2002.Google Scholar

Mothersill, Mary. Beauty Restored. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1984.Google Scholar

Mulhall, Stephen. Stanley Cavell: Philosophy’s Recounting of the Ordinary. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1994.Google Scholar

Nehamas, Alexander. Only a Promise of Happiness: The Place of Beauty in a World of Art. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2007.Google Scholar

Noë, Alva. Varieties of Presence. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2012.Google Scholar

Peacocke, Christopher, “Nonconceptual Content Defended,” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 57, no. 2 (1998).Google Scholar

Pippin, Robert. “The Significance of Taste: Kant, Aesthetic and Reflective Judgment,” Journal of the History of Philosophy 34 (1996).Google Scholar

Plato, . Symposium. Translated by Joyce, Michael. In The Collected Dialogues of Plato, edited by Hamilton, Edith and Cairns, Huntington. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1961.Google Scholar

Rogerson, Kenneth F. “The Meaning of Universal Validity in Kant’s Aesthetics,” Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 40 (1981).Google Scholar

Saarinen, Risto. Recognition and Religion: A Historical and Systematic Study. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2016.Google Scholar

Sartre, Jean-Paul. Being and Nothingness. Translated by Barnes, Hazel E.. New York: Washington Square Press, 1956.Google Scholar

Smith, Zadie. “Some Notes on Attunement.” In Feel Free: Essays. London: Penguin, 2018.Google Scholar

Torsen, Ingvild. “On Heidegger’s Interpretation of Kant’s Aesthetics,” British Journal of Aesthetics 56, no. 1 (2016).Google Scholar

Vasari, Giorgio. The Lives of the Artists. Translated by Bondanella, Julia Conaway and Bondanella, Peter. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1991.Google Scholar

Wellberry, David. “Stimmung,” translated by Pohl, Rebecca, New Formations, no. 93 (2018).Google Scholar

Wenzel, Christian. An Introduction to Kant’s Aesthetics: Core Concepts and Problems. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell, 2005.Google Scholar

Wicks, Robert. Kant on Judgment. London: Routledge, 2007.Google Scholar

Wiggins, David. “A Sensible Subjectivism.” In Needs, Values, Truth: Essays in the Philosophy of Value. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1998.Google Scholar

Winnicott, D. W. “Playing: Creative Activity and the Search for the Self.” In Playing and Reality. London: Routledge, 2005.Google Scholar

Winnicott, W. D. “Playing: A Theoretical Statement.” In Playing and Reality. London: Routledge, 2005.Google Scholar

Winnicott, W. D. “Transitional Objects and Transitional Phenomena.” In Playing and Reality. London: Routledge, 2005.Google Scholar

Wittgenstein, Ludwig. Philosophical Investigations, edited by Hacker, P. M. S. and Schulte, Joachim. Translated by Anscombe, G. E. M., Hacker, P. M. S., and Schulte, Joachim. Revised fourth edition. Oxford: Blackwell, 2009.Google Scholar

Wittgenstein, Ludwig. Philosophical Remarks, ed. Rhees, Rush. Translated by Hargreaves, Raymond and White, Roger. Oxford: Blackwell, 1964.Google Scholar

Wolterstorff, Nicholas. “Art and the Aesthetic: The Religious Dimension.” In The Blackwell Guide to Aesthetics, edited by Kivy, Peter. Oxford: Blackwell, 2004.Google Scholar

Zerilli, Linda M. G. A Democratic Theory of Judgment. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2016.Google Scholar

Zuckert, Rachel. Kant on Beauty and Biology: An Interpretation of the Critique of Judgment. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007.Google Scholar

Zuckert, Rachel. “The Purposiveness of Form,” Journal of the History of Philosophy 44 (2006).Google Scholar

Book contents

Bibliography

Summary

Access options

References

Primary Sources

Secondary Sources

Save book to Kindle

Save book to Dropbox

Save book to Google Drive