Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- List of maps and illustrations
- Acknowledgments
- List of abbreviations
- 1 The Don region
- 2 The wider world of the Don steppe frontier
- Introduction
- 1 Beyond borders, between worlds: Russian Empire and the making of the Don steppe frontier
- 2 People and power on the frontier: liberty, diversity, and de-centralization in the Don region to 1700
- 3 A middle ground between autonomy and dependence: the raiding economy of the Don steppe frontier to 1700
- 4 Boundaries of integration or exclusion? Migration, mobility, and state sovereignty on the southern frontier to 1700
- 5 Testing the boundaries of imperial alliance: cooperation, negotiation and resistance in the era of Razin (1667–1681)
- 6 Between Rus' and Rossiia: realigning the boundaries of Cossack communities in a time of migration and transition (1681–1695)
- 7 The era of raskol: religion and rebellion (1681–1695)
- 8 Incorporation without integration: the Azov interlude (1695–1711)
- 9 From frontier to borderland: the demarcation of the steppe and the delegitimization of raiding (1696–1710)
- 10 Boundaries of land, liberty, and identity: making the Don region legible to imperial officials (1696–1706)
- 11 The Bulavin uprising: the last stand of the old steppe (1706–1709)
- 12 Reshaping the Don in the imperial image: power, privilege, and patronage in the post-Bulavin era (1708–1739)
- 13 Closing the Cossack community: recording and policing the boundaries of group identity (1708–1739)
- 14 A borderline state of mind: the closing of the Don steppe frontier (1708–1739)
- Afterword
- Index
- References
13 - Closing the Cossack community: recording and policing the boundaries of group identity (1708–1739)
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 12 January 2010
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- List of maps and illustrations
- Acknowledgments
- List of abbreviations
- 1 The Don region
- 2 The wider world of the Don steppe frontier
- Introduction
- 1 Beyond borders, between worlds: Russian Empire and the making of the Don steppe frontier
- 2 People and power on the frontier: liberty, diversity, and de-centralization in the Don region to 1700
- 3 A middle ground between autonomy and dependence: the raiding economy of the Don steppe frontier to 1700
- 4 Boundaries of integration or exclusion? Migration, mobility, and state sovereignty on the southern frontier to 1700
- 5 Testing the boundaries of imperial alliance: cooperation, negotiation and resistance in the era of Razin (1667–1681)
- 6 Between Rus' and Rossiia: realigning the boundaries of Cossack communities in a time of migration and transition (1681–1695)
- 7 The era of raskol: religion and rebellion (1681–1695)
- 8 Incorporation without integration: the Azov interlude (1695–1711)
- 9 From frontier to borderland: the demarcation of the steppe and the delegitimization of raiding (1696–1710)
- 10 Boundaries of land, liberty, and identity: making the Don region legible to imperial officials (1696–1706)
- 11 The Bulavin uprising: the last stand of the old steppe (1706–1709)
- 12 Reshaping the Don in the imperial image: power, privilege, and patronage in the post-Bulavin era (1708–1739)
- 13 Closing the Cossack community: recording and policing the boundaries of group identity (1708–1739)
- 14 A borderline state of mind: the closing of the Don steppe frontier (1708–1739)
- Afterword
- Index
- References
Summary
Although by most accounts the Russian Empire never fully succeeded in turning “peasants into Russians,” it did succeed in shaping a Don Cossack people that was fiercely devoted to the Romanov dynasty and committed to a multi-ethnic Rossiia in which some peoples were more equal than others. Precisely because the boundaries of Don Cossack identity shifted so dramatically in only a few decades, the region provides a compelling case study for examining the construction of social identity and the creation of ethnic boundaries. While prior to 1705 the government played a predominant role in this process, suggesting that state intervention was a crucial ingredient in boundary creation and ethnic exclusivity, afterwards much of the initiative passed to Cossack leaders in Cherkassk. As in the modern world, a dynamic developed between documentation and deportation, ethnic exclusivity and economic exploitation. This chapter explores how and why the Cossacks began to codify, verify, and document individual identity in the Don region.
Previous studies of eighteenth-century imperial policies have not fully recognized the persistence of a territory conceptualized as Rus' within the Russian Empire nor analyzed the extent to which early imperial Russia was comprised of separate and distinct legal spaces. Marc Raeff argued that officials sought to create “a uniform pattern of administration throughout the empire.” James Cracraft outlined the parameters of a Petrine hegemony theory that would not “tolerate diversity in unity.”
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Imperial BoundariesCossack Communities and Empire-Building in the Age of Peter the Great, pp. 208 - 230Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2009