Abramowitz, Alan I., Alexander, Brad and Gunning, Matthew. 2006. “Incumbency, redistricting, and the decline of competition in U.S. House elections.” Journal of Politics 68(1):75–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Aldrich, John H. and Thomsen, Danielle M.. 2017. “Party, policy, and the ambition to run for higher office.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 42(2):321–343.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Aldrich, John H. and Rhode, David W.. 2001. “The republican revolution and the house appropriations committee.” The Journal of Politics 62(1):1–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Alford, John R. and Brady, David W.. 1989. “Personal and partisan advantage in US congressional elections.” In Congress Reconsidered, 4th ed., ed. Lawrence, C. Dodd and Bruce, I. Oppenhemier. New York: Praeger Publishers pp. 156–169.Google Scholar

Alford, John R. and Hibbing, John R.. 1981. “Increased incumbency advantage in the House.” Journal of Politics 43(4):1042–1061.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Anderson, Sarah E., Butler, Daniel M. and Harbridge-Yong, Laurel. 2020. Rejecting Compromise: Legislators’ Fear of Primary Voters. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ansolabehere, Stephen and Iyengar, Shanto. 1981. “Riding the wave and claiming ownership over issues: the joint effects of advertising and news coverage in campaigns.” Public Opinion Quarterly 58(3):335–357.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Arceneaux, Kevin, Dunaway, Johanna and Soroka, Stuart. 2018. “Elites are people, too: the effects of threat sensitivity on policymakers’ spending priorities.” PloS One 13(4):e0193781.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Arceneaux, Kevin, Dunaway, Johanna L., Johnson, Martin and Vander Wielen, Ryan J.. 2019. “Strategic candidate entry and congressional elections in the era of Fox News.” American Journal of Political Science 64(2):398–415.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Arceneaux, Kevin and Johnson, Martin. 2013. Changing Minds or Changing Channels? Partisan News in an Age of Choice. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Arceneaux, Kevin, Johnson, Martin, Lindstädt, René and Vander Wielen, Ryan J.. 2016. “The influence of news media on political elites: investigating strategic responsiveness in Congress.” American Journal of Political Science 60(1):5–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Arceneaux, Kevin, and Vander Wielen, Ryan. 2017. Taming Intuition: How Reflection Minimizes Partisan Reasoning and Promotes Democratic Accountability. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Arnold, Douglas R. 1990. The Logic of Congressional Action. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar

Arnold, Douglas R. 2004. Congress, the Press, and Political Accountability. Princeton: Russell Sage Foundation and Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Bafumi, Joseph and Herron, Michael C.. 2010. “Leapfrog representation and extremism: a study of American voters and their members in Congress.” American Political Science Review 104(3):519–542.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bailey, Kenneth. 2008. Methods of Social Research. New York, NY: The Free Press.Google Scholar

Bakker, Bert N., Kokil, Jaidka, DÃűrr, Timothy, Fasching, Neil and Lelkes, Yphtach. 2021. “Questionable and open research practices: attitudes and perceptions among quantitative communication researchers.” Journal of Communication 71(5):715–738.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Banda, Kevin K. and Cluverius, John. 2018. “Elite polarization, party extremity, and affective polarization.” Electoral Studies 56:90–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Barberá, Pablo, Casas, Andreu, Nagler, Jonathan et al. 2019. “Who leads? Who follows? Measuring issue attention and agenda setting by legislators and the mass public using social media data.” American Political Science Review 113(4):883–901.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Baumgartner, Frank R. and Jones, Bryan D.. 2010. Agendas and Instability in American Politics. 2nd ed. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Besley, Timothy and Burgess, Robin. 2001. “Political agency, government responsiveness and the role of the media.” European Economic Review 45(4): 629–640.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bianco, William T. 1984. “Strategic decisions on candidacy in U.S. congressional districts.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 9(2):351–364.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Black, Gordon S. 1972. “A theory of political ambition: career choices and the role of structural incentives.” American Political Science Review 66(1): 144–159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Boehner, John. 2021. Oh the House: A Washington Memoir. New York, NY: St. Martin’s Press.Google Scholar

Bond, Jon R., Covington, Cary and Fleisher, Richard. 1985. “Explaining challenger quality in congressional elections.” Journal of Politics 47(2): 510–529.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Canes-Wrone, Brandice, Brady, David W. and Cogan, John F.. 2002. “Out of step, out of office: electoral accountability and house members’ voting.” American Political Science Review 96(1):127–140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Brock, David. 2005. The Republican Noise Machine: Right-wing Media and How It Corrupts Democracy. New York, NY: Three Rivers Press.Google Scholar

Brock, David and Rabin-Havt, Ari. 2012. The Fox Effect: How Roger Ailes Turned a Network into a Propaganda Machine. New York: Anchor Books.Google Scholar

Broockman, David E. and Skovron, Christopher. 2018. “Bias in perceptions of public opinion among political elites.” American Political Science Review 112(3):542–563.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bullock, John G., Green, Donald P. and Ha, Shang E.. 2010. “Yes, but what’s the mechanism?(don’t expect an easy answer).” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 98(4):550.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Butler, Daniel M. 2014. Representing the Advantaged: How Politicians Reinforce Inequality. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Butler, Daniel M. and Broockman, David E.. 2011. “Do politicians racially discriminate against constituents? a field experiment on state legislators.” American Journal of Political Science 55(3):463–477.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Butler, Daniel M. and Nickerson, David W.. 2011. “Can learning constituency opinion affect how legislators vote? results from a field experiment.” Quarterly Journal of Political Science 6(1):55–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cain, Bruce, Ferejohn, John and Fiorina, Morris. 2013. The Personal Vote. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Camerer, Colin F., Anna Dreber, Eskil Forsell, Teck-Hua Ho, Jergen Huber, Johannesson, Magnus, Kirchler, Michael et al. 2016. “Evaluating replicability of laboratory experiments in economics.” Science 351(6280):1433–1436.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Camerer, Colin F., Anna Dreber, Felix Holzmeister, Teck-Hua Ho, Jergen Huber, Magnus Johannesson, Michael Kirchler, Gideon Nave, Brian A. Nosek, Thomas Pfeiffer, Adam Altmejd, Nick Buttrick, Taizan Chan, Yiling Chen, Eskil Forsell, Anup Gampa, Emma Heikensten, Lily Hummer, Taisuke Imai, Siri Isaksson, Dylan Manfredi, Julia Rose, Wagenmakers, Eric-Jan and Wu, Hang. 2018. “Evaluating the replicability of social science experiments in nature and science between 2010 and 2015.” Nature Human Behaviour 2: 637–644.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Campbell, James E., Alford, John R. and Henry, Keith. 1984. “Television markets and congressional elections.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 9(4):665–678.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Carlyle, Thomas. 1841. On Heroes, Hero-Worship, and The Heroic in History. London: James Fraser.Google Scholar

Carson, Jamie L., Engstrom, Erik J. and Roberts, Jason M.. 2007. “Candidate quality, the personal vote, and the incumbency advantage in congress.” American Political Science Review 101(2):289–301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Carson, Jamie L., Gregory Koger, Matthew J. Lebo and Everett Young. 2010. “The electoral costs of party loyalty in congress.” American Journal of Political Science 54(3):598–616.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Carter, David B. and Signorino, Curtis S.. 2000. “Political talk radio and public opinion.” Public Opinion Quarterly 64(2):149–170.Google Scholar

Cassino, Dan. 2016. Fox News and American Politics: How One Channel Shapes American Politics and Society. New York, NY and Abingdon, OX: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cater, Douglass. 1959. The Fourth Branch of Government. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar

Chadwick, Andrew. 2017. The Hybrid Media System: Politics and Power. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Chong, Dennis and Druckman, James N.. 2007. “Framing theory.” Annual Review of Political Science 10:103–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Clinton, Joshua D., Jackman, Simon and Rivers, Doug. 2004. “The most liberal senator”? analyzing and interpreting congressional roll calls.” PS: Political Science & Politics 37(4):805–811.Google Scholar

Clinton, Joshua D. and Enamorado, Ted. 2014. “The Fox News factor: how the spread of Fox News affects position taking in congress.” Journal of Politics 76(4):928–943.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cohen, Bernard C. 1963. The Press and Foreign Policy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Cohen, Jonathan, Tsfati, Yariv and Sheafer, Tamir. 2008. “The influence of presumed media influence in politics: do politicians’ perceptions of media power matter?” Public Opinion Quarterly 72(2):331–344.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cohen, Marty, Noel, Hans and Zaller, John. 2004. “Without a Watchdog: the Effect of Quality News Coverage on Congressional Polarization.” Prepared for presentation at the 2004 Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association.Google Scholar

Converse, Philip E. 1964. “The nature of belief systems in mass publics.” In Ideology and Discontent, ed. David, E. Apter. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar

Cook, Timothy E. 1989. Making Laws and Making News: Media Strategies in the U.S. House of Representatives. Washington, DC: The Brookings Institution.Google Scholar

Cook, Timothy E. 1998. Governing with the News: The News Media as a Political Institution. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Coppock, Alexander, Hill, Seth J. and Vavreck, Lynn. 2020. “The small effects of political advertising are small regardless of context, message, sender, or receiver: evidence from 59 real-time randomized experiments.” Science Advances 6(36):eabc4046.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Cox, Gary W. and Katz, Jonathan N.. 1996. “Why did the incumbency advantage in U.S. house elections grow?” American Journal of Political Science 40(2): 478–497.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cox, Gary W. and Katz, Jonathan N.. 2002. Elbridge Gerry’s Salamander: The Electoral Consequences of the Reapportionment Revolution. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cox, Gary W. and McCubbins, Mathew D.. 1993. Legislative Leviathan: Party Government in the House. Berkeley and Los Angeles, CA and London, England: University of California Press.Google Scholar

Crespin, Michael H. 2010. “Serving two masters: redistricting and voting in the US house of representatives.” Political Research Quarterly 63(4): 850–859.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Crespin, Michael H., Rohde, David W. and Vander Wielen, Ryan J.. 2013. “Measuring variations in party unity voting: an assessment of agenda effects.” Party Politics 19(3):432–457.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Darr, Joshua P., Hitt, Matthew P. and Dunaway, Johanna L.. 2018. “Newspaper closures polarize voting behavior.” Journal of Communication 68(6): 1007–1028.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Darr, Joshua P., Hitt, Matthew P. and Dunaway, Johanna L.. 2021. Home Style Opinion: How Local Newspapers Can Slow Polarization. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Davison, W. Phillips. 1983. “The third-person effect in communication.” Public Opinion Quarterly 47(1):1–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

DellaVigna, Stefano and Kaplan, Ethan. 2007. “The Fox News effect: media bias and voting.” The Quarterly Journal of Economics 122(3):1187–1234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Desposato, Scott W. and Petrocik, John R.. 2003. “The variable incumbency advantage: new voters, redistricting, and the personal vote.” American Journal of Political Science 47(1):18–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dienlin, Tobias, Niklas Johannes, Nicholas David Bowman, Masur, Philipp K., Sven Engesser, Anna Sophie Kümpel, Lukito, Josephine et al. 2021. “An agenda for open science in communication.” Journal of Communication 71(1):1–26. Donne, John. 1624. No Man is an Island.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Downs, Anthoy. 1957. An Economic Theory of Democracy. New York: Harper Collins.Google Scholar

Dunaway, Johanna and Graber, Doris A.. 2022. Mass Media and American Politics. 11th ed. Washington, DC: CQ Press.Google Scholar

Dunning, Thad. 2008. “Improving causal inference: strengths and limitations of natural experiments.” Political Research Quarterly 61(2):282–293.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Duverger, Maurice. 1959. Political Parties: Their Organization and Activity in the Modern State. New York: Methuen and Company.Google Scholar

Dynes, Adam M. 2020. “Which citizens do elected officials target with distributive spending? A survey experiment on US municipal officials.” American Politics Research 48(5):579–595.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Elster, Jon. 1989. Nuts and Bolts for the Social Sciences. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Farnsworth, Stephen J. 2015. Spinner in Chief: How Presidents Sell Their Policies and Themselves. Abingdon, OX and New York, NY: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Feldman, Stanley and Johnston, Christopher. 2014. “Understanding the determinants of political ideology: implications of structural complexity.” Political Psychology 35(2):337–358.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fenno, Richard Francis. 1978. Home Style: House Members in their Districts. Boston, MA: Little Brown.Google Scholar

Fiorina, Morris P. 1974. Representatives, Roll Calls, and Constituencies. Lexington Books.Google Scholar

Fiorina, Morris P. 2017. Unstable Majorities: Polarization, Party Sorting, and Political Stalemate. Stanford, CA: Hoover Press.Google Scholar

Fox, Richard L. and Lawless, Jennifer L.. 2005. “To run or not to run for office: explaining nascent political ambition.” American Journal of Political Science 49(3):642–659.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fox, Richard L. and Lawless, Jennifer L.. 2011. “Gaining and losing interest in running for public office: the concept of dynamic political ambition.” Journal of Politics 73(2):443–462.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gentzkow, Matthew and Shapiro, Jesse M.. 2010. “What drives media slant? Evidence from US daily newspapers.” Econometrica 78(1):35–71.Google Scholar

Gilens, Martin. 2005. “Inequality and democratic responsiveness.” Public Opinion Quarterly 69(5):778–796.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gilens, Martin. 2012. Affluence and Influence. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Goldberg, Bernard. 2014. Bias: A CBS Insider Exposes How the Media Distort the News. 3rd ed. New York: Regnery Publishing.Google Scholar

Goldstein, Harvey and Healy, Michael J. R.. 1995. “The graphical presentation of a collection of means.” Journal of the Royal Statistical Society (1):175–177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Graham, Jesse, Haidt, Jonathan and Nosek, Brian A.. 2009. “Liberals and conservatives rely on different sets of moral foundations.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 96(5):1029–1046.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Groseclose, Tim. 2011. Left Turn: How Liberal Media Bias Distorts the American Mind. New York: St. Martin’s Press.Google Scholar

Groseclose, Tim and Milyo, Jeffrey. 2005. “A measure of media bias.” The Quarterly Journal of Economics 120(4):1191–1237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hacker, Jacob S. and Pierson, Paul. 2006. Off Center: The Republican Revolution and the Erosion of American Democracy. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar

Haidt, Jonathan. 2012. The Righteous Mind: Why Good People are Divided by Politics and Religion. New York: Random House.Google Scholar

Hall, Thad Edward and Sinclair, Betsy. 2019. A Connected America: Politics in the Era of Social Media. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Hamilton, James T. 2004. All the News That’s Fit to Sell. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Hayes, Danny and Lawless, Jennifer L.. 2018. “The decline of local news and its effects: new evidence from longitudinal data.” Journal of Politics 80(1): 332–336.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Herbst, Susan. 1998. Reading Public Opinion: How Political Actors View the Democratic Process. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Hertel-Fernandez, Alexander, Mildenberger, Matto and Stokes, Leah C.. 2019. “Legislative staff and representation in congress.” American Political Science Review 113(1):1–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hetherington, Marc. 2001. “Resurgent mass partisanship: the role of elite polarization.” American Political Science Review 95(3):619–631.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hibbing, John R. and Theiss-Morse, Elizabeth. 1995. Congress as Public Enemy: Public Attitudes Toward American Political Institutions. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hirano, Shigeo and Snyder, James M.. 2012. “Primary elections and political accountability: what happens to incumbents in scandals.” Quarterly Journal of Political Science 7(4):447–456.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hopkins, Daniel J. 2018. The Increasingly United States: How and Why American Political Behavior Nationalized. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hopkins, Daniel J. and Ladd, Jonathan M.. 2014. “The consequences of broader media choice: evidence from the expansion of Fox News.” Quarterly Journal of Political Science 9(1):115–135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Humphreys, Macartan, Sanchez De la Sierra, Raul and Van der Windt, Peter 2013. “Fishing, commitment, and communication: a proposal for comprehensive nonbinding research registration.” Political Analysis 20(2):1–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hutchings, Vince L. 2001. “Political context, issue salience, and selective attentiveness: constituent knowledge of the Clarence Thomas confirmation vote.” Journal of Politics 63(3):846–868.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Huxley, Thomas Henry. 1870. Presented as the Address of Thomas Henry Huxley, President, Nature, Section: The British Association Liverpool Meeting. London: Macmillan and Company.Google Scholar

Iyengar, Shanto. 1991. Is Anyone Responsible? Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Iyengar, Shanto and Kinder, Donald R.. 1987. News That Matters: Television and American Opinion. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Iyengar, Shanto, Sood, Gaurav and Lelkes, Yphtach. 2012. “Affect, not ideology: a social identity perspective on polarization.” Public Opinion Quarterly 76(3):405–431.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jacobs, Lawrence R. and Shapiro, Robert Y.. 2000. Politicians Don’t Pander. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Jacobson, Gary C. 1980. Money in Congressional Elections. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar

Jacobson, Gary C. 1989. “Strategic politicians and the dynamics of US house elections, 1946–86.” American Political Science Review 83(3):773–793.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jacobson, Gary C. 2000. “Partisan polarization in national politics: the electoral connection.” In Polarized Politics Congress and the President in a Partisan Era, eds. Bond, Jon and Fleisher, Richard. Washington, DC: CQ Press pp. 351–370.Google Scholar

Jacobson, Gary C. 2009. “The 2008 presidential and congressional elections: anti-Bush referendum and prospects for the Democratic majority.” Political Science Quarterly 124(1):1–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jacobson, Gary C. 2015. “It’s nothing personal: the decline of the incumbency advantage in US house elections.” Journal of Politics 77(3):861–873.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jacobson, Gary C. and Kernell, Samuel. 1981. Strategy and Choice in Congressional Elections. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar

Jerit, Jennifer. 2008. “Issue framing and engagement: rhetorical strategy in public policy debates.” Political Behavior 30:1–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

John, Leslie K., Loewenstein, George and Prelec, Drazen. 2012. “Measuring the prevalence of questionable research practices with incentives for truth telling.” Psychological Science 23(5):524–532.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Jones, David R. and McDermott, Monika L.. 2010. Americans, Congress, and Democratic Responsiveness: Public Evaluations of Congress and Electoral Consequences. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jost, John T., Glaser, Jack, Kruglanski, Arie W. and Sulloway, Frank J.. 2003. “Political conservatism as motivated social cognition.” The Motivated Mind 129(3):339–375.Google ScholarPubMed

Kazee, Thomas A. 1994. “Ambition and candidacy: running as a strategic calculation.” In Who Runs for Congress? Ambition, Context, and Candidate Emergence, ed. Thomas, A. Kazee. Washington, DC: CQ Press, pp. 165–184.Google Scholar

Key, V. O. 1961. Public Opinion and American Democracy. New York: Alford A. Knopf.Google Scholar

Kingdon, John W. 1989. Congressmen’s Voting Decisions. 3rd ed. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Klein, Richard A., Ratliff, Kate A., Vianello, Michelangelo, Adams, Reginald B. Jr, Bahník, Štěpán, Bernstein, Michael J., Konrad, Bocian et al. 2014. “Investigating variation in replicability.” Social Psychology 45(3):137–252.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Klein, Richard A., Adams, Michelangelo Vianello Fred Hasselman Byron G., Adams, Reginald B. Jr., Alper, Sinan, Aveyard, Mark et al. 2018. “Many labs 2: investigating variation in replicability across samples and settings.” Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science 1(4): 443–490.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Koc-Michalska, Karolina, Lilleker, Darren G., Michalski, Tomasz, Gibson, Rachel and Zajac, Jan M.. 2021. “Facebook affordances and citizen engagement during elections: European political parties and their benefit from online strategies?” Journal of Information Technology & Politics 18(2):180–193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Krehbiel, Keith, Shepsle, Kenneth A. and Weingast, Barry R.. 1987. “Why are congressional committees powerful?” American Political Science Review 81(3):929–935.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kujala, Jordan. 2020. “Donors, primary elections, and polarization in the United States.” American Journal of Political Science 64(3):587–602.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ladd, Jonathan M. 2012. Why Americans Hate the Media and How It Matters. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ladd, Jonathan McDonald and Lenz, Gabriel S.. 2009. “Exploiting a rare communication shift to document the persuasive power of the news media.” American Journal of Political Science 53(2):394–410.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Laponse, Jean A. 1981. Left and Right: The Topography of Political Perceptions. Toronto, CN: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar

Laver, Michael and Garry, John. 2000. “Estimating policy positions from political texts.” American Journal of Political Science 44(3):619–634.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Levendusky, Matthew S. 2009. The Partisan Sort: How Liberals Became Democrats and Conservatives Became Republicans. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Levendusky, Matthew S. 2013. How Partisan Media Polarize America. Chicago, IL and London, England: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lilleker, Darren G., Koc-Michalska, Karolina, Negrine, Ralph, Gibson, Rachel, Vedel, Thierry, and Strudel, Sylvie. 2017. “Social media campaigning in Europe: mapping the terrain.” Journal of Information Technology & Politics 14(4):293–298.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lindstädt, René and Vander Wielen, Ryan J.. 2011. “Timely shirking: time-dependent monitoring and its effects on legislative behavior in the U.S. senate.” Public Choice 148(1–2):119–148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lindstädt, René and Vander Wielen, Ryan J.. 2014. “Dynamic elite partisanship: party loyalty and agenda setting in the U.S. house.” British Journal of Political Science 44(4):741–772.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Linsky, Martin. 1986. Impact: How the President Affects Policymaking. New York: W.W. Norton.Google Scholar

Lord, Charles G., Ross, Lee and Lepper, Mark R.. 1979. “Biased assimilation and attitude polarization: the effects of prior theories on subsequently considered evidence.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 27(11): 2098–2109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lubinski, Charles. 1996. “Reconsidering retransmission consent: an examination of the retransmission consent provision (47 USC 325 (b)) of the 1992 cable act.” Federal Communications Law Journal 49:99.Google Scholar

Maestas, Cherie D., Fulton, Sarah A., Sandy Maisel, L. and Stone, Walter J.. 2006. “When to risk it? Institutions, ambitions, and the decision to run for the U.S. house.” American Political Science Review 100(2):195–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Maltzman, Forrest. 1997. Competing Principals: Committees, Parties, and the Organization of Congress. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Manin, Bernard. 1997. The Principles of Representative Government. Cambridge, UK and New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mansbridge, Jane. 2003. “Rethinking representation.” American Political Science Review 97(4):515–528.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Martin, Gregory J. and Yurukoglu, Ali. 2017. “Bias in cable news: persuasion and polarization.” American Economic Review 107(9):2565–2599.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Martin, Gregory J. and McCrain, Josh. 2019. “Local news and national politics.” American Political Science Review 2(113):372–384.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mayhew, David. 1974. The Electoral Connection. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar

McCarty, Nolan, Poole, Keith T. and Rosenthal, Howard. 2006. Polarized America: The Dance of Ideology and Unequal Riches. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

McCombs, Maxwell. 2004. Setting the Agenda: The Mass Media and Public Opinion. Cambridge, UK and Malden, MA: Polity Press.Google Scholar

McCombs, Maxwell and Shaw, Doonald R.. 1972. “The agenda setting function of the mass media.” Public Opinion Quarterly 36(2):176–187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Miguel, Edward, Colin Camerer, Katherine Casey, Joshua Cohen, Kevin M. Esterling, Alan Gerber, Glennerster, Rachel et al. 2014. “Promoting transparency in social science research.” Science 343(6166):30–31.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Miller, Gary and Schofield, Norman. 2003. “Activists and partisan realignment in the United States.” American Political Science Review 97(2):245–260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Miller, Warren E. and Stokes, Donald E.. 1963. “Constituency influence in congress.” American Political Science Review 57(1):45–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mondak, Jeff. 1995. “Competence, integrity, and the electoral success of congressional incumbents.” Journal of Politics 57(4):1043–1069.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Noel, Hans. 2014. Political Ideologies and Political Parties in America. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Nosek, Brian A., Ebersole, Charles R., DeHaven, Alexander C. and Mellor, David T.. 2018. “The preregistration revolution.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 115(11):2600–2606.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Nyhan, Brendan, Eric McGhee, John Sides, Masket, Seth and Greene, Steven. 2012. “One vote out of step? the effects of salient roll call votes in the 2010 election.” American Politics Research 40(5):844–879.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

O’Neill, Tip and Hymel, Gary. 1994. All Politics Is Local, and Other Rules of the Game. New York, NY: Crown.Google Scholar

Open Science Collaboration. 2015. “Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science.” Science 349(6251):aac4716.Google Scholar

Padgett, Jeremy, Dunaway, Johanna L. and Darr, Joshua P.. 2019. “As seen on TV? How gatekeeping makes the US house seem more extreme.” Journal of Communication 69(6):696–719.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Park, Hong Min, Smith, Steven S. and Vander Wielen, Ryan J.. 2017. Politics Over Process: Partisan Conflict and Post-passage Processes in the US Congress. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Parker, David C.W. and Goodman, Craig. 2009. “Making a good impression: resource allocation, home styles, and Washington work.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 34(9):493–524.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Payson, Julia, Andreu Casas, Jonathan Nagler, Bonneau, Richard and Tucker, Joshua A.. 2022. “Using social media data to reveal patterns of policy engagement in state legislatures.” State Politics & Policy Quarterly 22(4):371–395.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Pilet, Jean-Benoît, Lior Sheffer, Luzia Helfer, Varone, Frederic, Vliegenthart, Rens and Walgrave, Stefann. 2023. “Do politicians outside the United States also think voters are more conservative than they really are?” American Political Science Review 5:1–9.Google Scholar

Poole, Keith T. and Rosenthal, Howard. 1985. “A spatial model for legislative roll call analysis.” American Journal of Political Science 29(2):357–384.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Prinz, Timothy S. 1993. “Moving from the outside in? Ross Perot and anti-incumbency in the 1992 congressional races.” Journal of Political Science 22(1):51–75.Google Scholar

Prior, Markus. 2007. Post-Broadcast Democracy: How Media Choice Increases Inequality in Political Involvement and Polarizes Elections. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Riker, W. H. 1995. “The political psychology of rational choice theory.” Political Psychology (1):23–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rohde, David W. 1979. “Risk-bearing and Progressive ambition: the case of members of the United States house of representatives.” American Journal of Political Science 23(1):1–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rohde, David W. 1991. Parties and Leaders in the Postreform House. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rousseau, Jean-Jacques. 1762. The Social Contract (1762). Londres.Google Scholar

Rubenson, Daniel. 2021. “Tie my hands loosely: pre-analysis plans in political science.” Politics and The Life Sciences 40(2):142–151.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Schlesinger, Joseph A. 1966. Ambition and Politics: Political Careers in the United States. Chicago, IL: Rand MacNally and Co.Google Scholar

Sellers, Patrick. 2010. Cycles of Spin: Strategic Communication in the U.S. Congress. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Sheffer, Lior, Peter John Loewen, Stuart Soroka, Walgrave, Stefaan and Sheafer, Tamir. 2018. “Nonrepresentative representatives: an experimental study of the decision making of elected politicians.” American Political Science Review 112(2):302–321.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Shepsle, Kenneth A. and Weingast, Barry R.. 1981. “Political preferences for the pork barrel: a generalization.” American Journal of Political Science 25(1): 96–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Shepsle, Kenneth A. and Weingast, Barry R.. 1987. “The institutional foundations of committee power.” American Political Science Review 81(1): 85–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sinclair, Barbara. 2002. “Do parties matter?” In Party, Process, and Political Change in Congress: New Perspectives on the History of Congress, eds. David, W. Brady and Mathew, D. McCubbins. Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar

Slapin, Jonathan B. and Proksch, Sven-Oliver. 2008. “A scaling model for estimating time-series party positions from texts.” American Journal of Political Science 52(3):705–722.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Smith, Steven S., Roberts, Jason M. and Vander Wielen, Ryan J.. 2020. The American Congress. 10th ed. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar

Snyder, James M. Jr. and David Strömberg. 2010. “Press coverage and political accountability.” Journal of Political Economy 118(2):355–408.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Snyder, James M. Jr. and Ting, Michael W.. 2003. “Roll calls, party labels, and elections.” Political Analysis 144(4):419–444.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Song, B. K. 2022. “Television and economic voting in US presidential elections.” British Journal of Political Science 1–13.Google Scholar

Soroka, Stuart N. and Wlezien, Christopher. 2022. Information and Democracy: Public Policy in the News. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Squire, Peverill and Smith, Eric R. A. N.. 1984. “Repeat challengers in congressional elections.” American Politics Quarterly 12(1):51–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Stimson, James A., MacKuen, Michael B. and Erikson, Robert S.. 1995. “Dynamic representation.” American Political Science Review 89(3): 543–565.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Stone, Walter J. and Sandy Maisel, L.. 2003. “The not-so-simple calculus of winning: potential U.S. house candidates’ nomination and general election chances.” Journal of Politics 65(4):951–977.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Stone, Walter J., Fulton, Sarah A., Maestas, Cherie D. and Sandy Maisel, L.. 2010. “Incumbency reconsidered: prospects, strategic retirement, and incumbent quality in US House elections.” The Journal of Politics 72(1): 178–190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Stroud, Natalie Jomini. 2011. Niche News: The Politics of News Choice. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Tausanovitch, Chris and Warshaw, Christopher. 2013. “Measuring constituent policy preferences in congress, state legislatures, and cities.” The Journal of Politics 75(2):330–342.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Tell it like it is. 2020. Nature Human Behaviour 4:1. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-020-0818-9Google Scholar

Trussler, Marc J. 2021. “Get information or get in formation: the effects of high-information environments on legislative elections.” British Journal of Political Science 51(4):1529–1549.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Trussler, Marc J. 2022. “The impact of high information environments on legislative behavior in the US house of representatives.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 47:95–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Tversky, A. and Kahneman, D.. 1981. “The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice.” Science 185:453–458.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Vallone, Robert P., Ross, Lee and Lepper, Mark R.. 1985. “The hostile media phenomenon: biased perception and perceptions of media bias in coverage of the Beirut massacre.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 49(3): 95–126.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Vavreck, Lynn. 2009. The Message Matters. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Vinson, C. Danielle. 2003. Local Media Coverage of Congress and Its Members: Through Local Eyes. New York: Hampton Press.Google Scholar

Vinson, C. Danielle. 2017. Congress and the Media. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Wagenmakers, Eric-Jan, Ruud Wetzels, Denny Borsboom, van der Maas, Han L.J. and Kievit, Rogier A.. 2012. “An agenda for purely confirmatory research.” Perspectives on Psychological Science 7(6):632–638.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Weingast, Barry R. and Marshall, William J.. 1988. “The industrial organization of Congress; or, why legislatures, like firms, are not organized as markets.” Journal of Political Economy 96(1):132–163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Weissberg, Robert. 2002. “Collective vs. dyadic representation in Congress.” American Political Science Review 72(2):535–547.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Yanovitzky, Itzhak. 2002. “Effects of news coverage on policy attention and actions: a closer look into the media-policy connection.” Communication Research 29(4):422–451.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Zaller, John R. 1992. The Nature and Origins of Mass Opinion. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Zaller, John R. 1996. “The myth of massive media impact revisited: new support for a discredited idea.” In Political Persuasion and Attitude Change, eds. Paul, M. Sniderman Diana Mutz and Richard A. Brody. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press, pp. 17–78.Google Scholar

Zaller, John R. 2003. “A new standard of news quality: burglar alarms for the monitorial citizen.” Political Communication (2):109–130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Zingher, Joshua N. and Flynn, Michael E.. 2018. “From on high: the effect of elite polarization on mass attitudes and behaviors, 1972–2012.” British Journal of Political Science 48(1):23–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar