Bratman, Michael (1999) Faces of intention. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dennett, Daniel (1987) The intentional stance. MIT Press.Google Scholar

Fauconnier, Gilles (1994) Mental spaces. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Fodor, Jerry A. (1975) The language of thought. Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Fodor, Jerry A. (1978) Propositional attitudes. The Monist 61, 501–523.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Frege, Gottlob (1892/1952) On sense and reference. In Geach, P. and Black, M., (Eds.). Translations from the philosophical writings of Gottlob Frege (pp. 55–78). Blackwell.Google Scholar

Grano, Thomas (2021) Attitude reports. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Grano, Thomas (2022) Intention reports and eventuality abstraction in a theory of mood choice. Under review.Google Scholar

Heim, Irene & Kratzer, Angelika (1998) Semantics in generative grammar. Blackwell.Google Scholar

Jackendoff, Ray (1975) On belief-contexts, Linguistic Inquiry, 6(1), 53–93.Google Scholar

Jackendoff, Ray (1980) Belief-Contexts Revisited, Linguistic Inquiry, 11(2), 395–413.Google Scholar

Jackendoff, Ray (1983) Semantics and cognition. MIT Press.Google Scholar

Jackendoff, Ray (1985) Believing and intending: two sides of the same coin, Linguistic Inquiry, 16(3), 445–459.Google Scholar

Jackendoff, Ray (1990)Semantic structures. MIT Press.Google Scholar

Jackendoff, Ray (2002) Foundations of language. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Jackendoff, Ray (2007) Language, consciousness, culture. MIT Press.Google Scholar

Jackendoff, Ray (2010) The natural logic of morals and of laws, Brooklyn Law Review 75 (2), 383–407.Google Scholar

Jackendoff, Ray (2012) A User’s guide to thought and meaning. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Lakoff, George (1987) Women, fire, and dangerous things. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Nelson, Michael (2019) Propositional attitude reports. The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Spring 2019 Ed.), Zalta, Edward N. (Ed.), https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2019/entries/prop-attitude-reports/Google Scholar

Pinker, Steven (2007) The stuff of thought. Penguin Group.Google Scholar

Pustejovsky, James (1995) The generative lexicon. MIT Press.Google Scholar

Quine, W. v. O. ( 1956) Quantifiers and propositional attitudes. Journal of Philosophy, 53, 177–187.Google Scholar

Russell, Bertrand (1905) On denoting. Mind, 14, 479–493.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Schwitzgebel, Eric (2019) “Belief”, The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Fall 2019 Ed.), Zalta, Edward N. (ed.), https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2019/entries/belief/Google Scholar

Searle, John (1983) Intentionality. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Stalnaker, Robert (1984) Inquiry. MIT Press.Google Scholar

Stich, Stephen (1983) From folk psychology to cognitive science: the case against belief. MIT Press.Google Scholar

Vendler, Zeno (1972) Res cogitans. Cornell University Press.Google Scholar

Wierzbicka, Anna (1987) English speech act verbs: a semantic dictionary. Academic Press.Google Scholar

Wittgenstein, Ludwig (1953) Philosophical investigations. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Allport, F. H. & Lepkin, M. (1945) Wartime rumors of waste and special privilege: why some people believe them. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 40, 3–36.Google Scholar

Alter, A. L. & Oppenheimer, D. M. (2009) Uniting the tribes of fluency to form a metacognitive nation. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 13(3), 219–235. https://doi.org/10.1177/1088868309341564Google Scholar

Anderson, C. A. (1983) Abstract and concrete data in the perseverance of social theories: when weak data lead to unshakeable beliefs. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 19(2), 93–108. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-1031(83)90031-8Google Scholar

Andrews, K. (2012) Do apes read minds? Toward a new folk psychology. MIT Press.Google Scholar

Andrews, K. (2017) Do chimpanzees reason about belief? In Andrews, K., & Beck, J. (Eds.). The Routledge handbook of philosophy of animal minds (pp. 258–268). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315742250-25CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Asp, E. & Tranel, D. (2013) False tagging theory. In Stuss, D. T., & Knight, R. T. (Eds.). Principles of frontal lobe function, 2nd ed. (pp. 383–416). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195134971.001.0001Google Scholar

Astuti, R. & Harris, P. (2008) Understanding mortality and the life of the ancestors in rural Madagascar. Cognitive Science: a Multidisciplinary Journal, 32(4), 713–740. https://doi.org/10.1080/03640210802066907Google Scholar

Atran, S. (2002) In gods we trust. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Bail, C. A., Argyle, L. P., Brown, T. W. et al. (2018) Exposure to opposing views on social media can increase political polarization. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 115(37), 9216–9221.Google Scholar

Baldassano, C., Chen, J., Zadbood, A., Pillow, J. W., Hasson, U., & Norman, K. A. (2017) Discovering event structure in continuous narrative perception and memory. Neuron, 95(3), 709–721.Google Scholar

Banas, J. A. & Rains, S. A. (2010) A meta-analysis of research on inoculation theory. Communication Monographs, 77(3), 281–311.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Baron-Cohen, S. (1997) Mindblindness: an essay on autism and theory of mind. MIT Press.Google Scholar

Baron-Cohen, S., Leslie, A. M., & Frith, U. (1985). Does the autistic child have a “theory of mind”? Cognition, 21(1), 37–46. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0277(85)90022-8Google Scholar

Beecher, Henry K. (1955) The powerful placebo. Journal of the American Medical Association 159(7), 1602–1606. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.1955.02960340022006CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Bendaña, J. & Mandelbaum, E. (2021) The fragmentation of belief. In Kindermann, Dirk, Borgoni, Cristina, & Onofri, Andrea (Eds.). The fragmentation of mind. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Bermúdez, J. L. (2008) Thinking without words. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Bingel, U., Wanigasekera, V., Wiech, K. et al. (2011) The effect of treatment expectation on drug efficacy: imaging the analgesic benefit of the opioid remifentanil. Science translational medicine, 3(70), 7–14. https://doi.org/10.1126/scitranslmed.3001244Google Scholar

Block, N. (1980) Troubles with functionalism. Readings in Philosophy of Psychology, 1, 268–305.Google Scholar

Bouton, M. E. (2004) Context and behavioral processes in extinction. Learning & Memory, 11(5), 485–494. https://doi.org/10.1101/lm.78804CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Bouton, M. E, & Bolles, R.C. (1979) Role of conditioned contextual stimuli in reinstatement of extinguished fear. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 5(4), 368–378. https://doi.org/10.1037//0097-7403.5.4.368Google Scholar

Bouton, M. E. & King, D. A. (1983) Contextual control of the extinction of conditioned fear: tests for the associative value of the context. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 9(3), 248–265.Google Scholar

Bouton, M. E. & Ricker, S. T. (1994) Renewal of extinguished responding in a second context. Animal Learning & Behavior, 22, 317–324.Google Scholar

Bouton, M. E., Westbrook, R. F., Corcoran, K. A., & Maren, S. (2006) Contextual and temporal modulation of extinction: behavioral and biological mechanisms. Biological Psychiatry, 60(4), 352–360.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Brock, T. C. & Balloun, J. L. (1967) Behavioral receptivity to dissonant information. Journal of personality and social psychology, 6(4), 413–428.Google Scholar

Brooks, D. C. & Bouton, M. E. (1993) A retrieval cue for extinction attenuates spontaneous recovery. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 19(1), 77–89.Google Scholar

Brownstein, M. (2015) Implicit Bias. In Zalta, E (Ed.). The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy, Spring 2015.Google Scholar

Brownstein, M. (2018) The implicit mind: cognitive architecture, the self, and ethics. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780190633721.001.0001Google Scholar

Buttelmann, D., Buttelmann, F., Carpenter, M., Call, J., & Tomasello, M. (2017) Great apes distinguish true from false beliefs in an interactive helping task. PLoS ONE, 12(4), 1–13, e0173793. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0173793Google Scholar

Buttelmann, D., Carpenter, M., & Tomasello, M. (2009) Eighteen-month-old infants show false belief understanding in an active helping paradigm. Cognition. 112(2), 337–342 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2009.05.006.Google Scholar

Brashier, N. M. & Marsh, E. J. (2020) Judging truth. Annual Review of Psychology, 71(1), 499–515. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-010419-050807CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Cheke, L. G. & Clayton, N. S. (2010) Mental time travel in animals. WIREs Cognitive Science, 1(6), 915–930. https://doi.org/10.1002/wcs.59Google Scholar

Cheyette, S. & Piantadosi, S. (2017) Knowledge transfer in a probabilistic language of thought. In CogSci.Google Scholar

Cialdini, R. B., Trost, M. R., & Newsom, J. T. (1995) Preference for consistency: the development of a valid measure and the discovery of surprising behavioral implications. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69(2), 318–328. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.69.2.318Google Scholar

Clatterbuck, H. (2016) Darwin, Hume, Morgan, and the verae causae of psychology. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences, 60, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.shpsc.2016.09.002Google Scholar

Clements, W. A. & Perner, J. (1994) Implicit understanding of belief. Cognitive Development, 9(4), 377–395. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0885-2014(94)90012-4Google Scholar

Colloca, L. & Benedetti, F. (2007) Nocebo hyperalgesia: how anxiety is turned into pain. Current Opinions in Anaesthesiology, 20(5), 435–439. https://doi.org/10.1097/ACO.0b013e3282b972fbGoogle Scholar

Compton, J. (2020) Prophylactic versus therapeutic inoculation treatments for resistance to influence. Communication Theory, 30(3), 330–343.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cone, J., Flaharty, K., & Ferguson, M. J. (2021) The long-term effects of new evidence on implicit impressions of other people. Psychological Science, 32(2), 173–188. doi:10.1177/0956797620963559Google Scholar

Cone, J., Mann, T. C., & Ferguson, M. J. (2017). Changing our implicit minds: how, when, and why implicit evaluations can be rapidly revised. In Olson, J. M., (Ed.). Advances in experimental social psychology: vol. 56 (pp. 131–199). Academic Press.Google Scholar

Davidson, D. (1982) Rational animals. Dialectica, 36(4), 317–328. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1746-8361.1982.tb01546.xGoogle Scholar

De Houwer, J., Van Dessel, P., & Moran, T. (2020) Attitudes beyond associations: On the role of propositional representations in stimulus evaluation. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 61, 127–183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dennett, D. C. (1987) The intentional stance. MIT Press.Google Scholar

Dennett, D. C. (1991) Real patterns. The Journal of Philosophy, 88(1), 27–51. https://doi.org/10.2307/2027085Google Scholar

DuBrow, S., Rouhani, N., Niv, Y., & Norman, K. A. (2017) Does mental context drift or shift?. Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences, 17, 141–146.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Ecker, U. K., Lewandowsky, S., & Apai, J. (2011). Terrorists brought down the plane! – no, actually it was a technical fault: Processing corrections of emotive information. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 64(2), 283–310.Google Scholar

Ecker, U. K., Lewandowsky, S., & Tang, D. T. (2010) Explicit warnings reduce but do not eliminate the continued influence of misinformation. Memory & Cognition, 38(8), 1087–1100.Google Scholar

Egan, A. (2008) Seeing and believing: perception, belief formation and the divided mind. Philosophical Studies, 140(1), 47–63. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11098–008-9225-1Google Scholar

Elga, A. & Rayo, A. (2021) Fragmentation and Information Access. In Kindermann, Dirk, Borgoni, Cristina, & Onofri, Andrea (Eds.). The fragmentation of mind. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Fazio, L., Rand, D., & Pennycook, G. (2019) Repetition increases perceived truth equally for plausible and implausible statements. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 26, 1705–1710. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423–019-01651-4Google Scholar

Fazio, L. K., Brashier, N. M., Payne, B. K., & Marsh, E. J. (2015) Knowledge does not protect against illusory truth. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 144(5), 993–1002. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/xge0000098.suppGoogle Scholar

Festinger, L., Riecken, H. W., & Schachter, S. (1956). When prophecy fails. University of Minnesota Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/10030-000Google Scholar

Festinger, L., Riecken, H., & Schachter, S. (2017) When prophecy fails: a social and psychological study of a modern group that predicted the destruction of the world. Lulu Press, Inc.Google Scholar

Fodor, J. A. (1978) Propositional attitudes. The Monist, 61(4), 501–523. https://doi.org/10.5840/monist197861444Google Scholar

Fodor, J. A. (1987) Psychosemantics: the problem of meaning in the philosophy of mind. MIT Press.Google Scholar

Gendler, T. (2008) Alief and belief. The Journal of Philosophy, 105(10), 634–663. https://doi.org/10.5840/jphil20081051025CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gilbert, D. T. (1991) How mental systems believe. American Psychologist, 46(2), 107–119. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.46.2.107Google Scholar

Gilbert, D. T., Krull, D., & Malone, M. (1990). Unbelieving the unbelievable: some problems in the rejection of false information. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59(4), 601–613. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.59.4.601Google Scholar

Gilbert, D. T., Pinel, E. C., Wilson, T. D., Blumberg, S. J., & Wheatley, T. P. (1998) Immune neglect: a source of durability bias in affective forecasting. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75(3), 617–638. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.75.3.617Google Scholar

Greenwald, A. & Nosek, B. (2009) Attitudinal dissociation: what does it mean? In Attitudes: insights from the new implicit measures, Petty, R., Fazio, R., & Brinol, P. (Eds.). (pp. 65–82). Psychology Press.Google Scholar

Goodman, N. D., Tenenbaum, J. B., & Gerstenberg, T. (2014) Concepts in a probabilistic language of thought. In The conceptual mind: new directions in the study of concepts. MIT Press.Google Scholar

Goodman, N. D., Ullman, T. D., & Tenenbaum, J. B. (2011). Learning a theory of causality. Psychological Review, 118(1), 110–199.Google Scholar

Gray, H. M., Gray, K., & Wegner, D. M. (2007) Dimensions of mind perception. Science, 315(5812), 619–619. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1134475Google Scholar

Gu, X., Lohrenz, T., Salas, R. et al. (2015) Belief about nicotine selectively modulates value and reward prediction error signals in smokers. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 112(8): 2539–2544. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1416639112Google Scholar

Gundersen, H., Specht, K., Grüner, R., Ersland, L., & Hugdahl, K. (2008) Separating the effects of alcohol and expectancy on brain activation: an fMRI working memory study. Neuroimage, 42(4), 1587–1596. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2008.05.037Google Scholar

Hampton, J. A. (1995) Testing the prototype theory of concepts. Journal of Memory and Language, 34(5), 686–708. https://doi.org/10.1006/jmla.1995.1031Google Scholar

Hasher, L., Goldstein, D., & Toppino, T. (1977) Frequency and the conference of referential validity. Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behaviour, 16(1), 107–112. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022–5371(77)80012-1.Google Scholar

Hawthorne, J., Rothschild, D., & Spectre, L. (2016) Belief is weak. Philosophical Studies, 173(5), 1393–1404. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11098–015-0553-7Google Scholar

van Holst, R. J., Clark, L., Veltman, D. J., van den Brink, W., & Goudriaan, A. E. (2014) Enhanced striatal responses during expectancy coding in alcohol dependence. Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 142, 204–208. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2014.06.019Google Scholar

Howard, S., Avarguès-Weber, A., Garcia, J., Greentree, A.D., & Dyer, A. D. (2019) Numerical ordering of zero in honeybees. Science, 360(6393), 1124–1126. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aar4975Google Scholar

Hughes, S., Ye, Y., Van Dessel, P., & De Houwer, J. (2019) When people co-occur with good or bad events: graded effects of relational qualifiers on evaluative conditioning. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 45(2), 196–208. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167218781340Google Scholar

Icard, T. (2016) Subjective probability as sampling propensity. Review of Philosophy and Psychology, 7(4), 863–903.Google Scholar

Jacobs, K. W. & Nordan, F. M. (1979) Classification of placebo drugs: effect of color. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 49(2), 367–372. https://doi.org/10.2466/pms.1979.49.2.367Google Scholar

Jensen, G., Alkan, Y., Ferrera, V. P., & Terrace, H. S. (2018) Reward associations do not explain transitive inference performance in monkeys. Science Advances, 5(7), Article aaw2089. https://doi.org:10.7287/peerj.preprints.26889v1Google Scholar

Katz, Y., Goodman, N.D., Kersting, K., Kemp, C., & Tenenbaum, J.B. (2008). Modeling semantic cognition as logical dimensionality reduction. Proceedings of the Cognitive Science Society, 30.Google Scholar

Kemp, C., Goodman, N., & Tenenbaum, J. (2008). Learning and using relational theories. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 20, 753–760.Google Scholar

Knowles, E. S. & Condon, C. A. (1999) Why people say “yes”: a dual-process theory of acquiescence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77(2), 379–386. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.77.2.379Google Scholar

Krupenye, C., Kano, F., Hirata, S., Call, J., & Tomasello, M. (2016) Great apes anticipate that other individuals will act according to false beliefs. Science, 354(6308), 110–114. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aaf8110Google Scholar

Kufahl, P., Li, Z., Risinger, R. et al. (2008) Expectation modulates human brain responses to acute cocaine: a functional magnetic resonance imaging study. Biological Psychiatry, 63(2), 222–230. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsych.2007.03.021Google Scholar

Kumkale, G. T. & Albarracín, D. (2004) The sleeper effect in persuasion: a meta-analytic review. Psychological Bulletin, 130(1), 143–172. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.130.1.143Google Scholar

Kurdi, B. & Banaji, M. R. (2017) Repeated evaluative pairings and evaluative statements: how effectively do they shift implicit attitudes? Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 146(2), 194–213. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/xge0000239Google Scholar

Kurdi, B. & Banaji, M. R. (2019) Attitude change via repeated evaluative pairings versus evaluative statements: shared and unique features. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 116(5), 681–703. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/pspa0000151Google Scholar

Kurdi, B. & Dunham, Y. (2020) Propositional accounts of implicit evaluation: taking stock and looking ahead. Social Cognition, 38(Supplement), s42–s67. http://doi.org/10.1521/soco.2020.38.supp.s42CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kurdi, B. & Dunham, Y. (2021) Sensitivity of implicit evaluations to accurate and erroneous propositional inferences. Cognition, 214, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2021.104792.Google Scholar

Lai, C. K., Skinner, A. L., Cooley, E. et al. (2016) Reducing implicit racial preferences: II. Intervention effectiveness across time. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 145(8), 1001–1016. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/xge0000179Google Scholar

Lacassagne, D., Béna, J., & Corneille, O. (2022) Is Earth a perfect square? Repetition increases the perceived truth of highly implausible statements. Cognition, 223, 105052. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2022.105052Google Scholar

Lange, M. (2002) Who’s afraid of Ceteris-Paribus laws? Or: how i Learned to stop worrying and love them. Erkenntnis 57, 407–423. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1021546731582Google Scholar

Lewis, D. (1980) Mad pain and Martian pain. In Block, Ned (Ed.). Readings in the philosophy of psychology (pp. 216 S.222). Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Liang, P., Jordan, M. I., & Klein, D. (2010) Learning programs: a hierarchical Bayesian approach. In Proceedings of the 27th International Conference on Machine Learning (ICML-10) (pp. 639–646).Google Scholar

Lurz, R. W. (2015) Mindreading animals: the debate over what animals know about other minds. MIT Press. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/9780262016056.001.0001Google Scholar

Mandelbaum, E. (2013) Against alief. Philosophical Studies, 165(1), 197–211. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11098–012-9930-7Google Scholar

Mandelbaum, E. (2014) Thinking is believing. Inquiry, 57(1), 55–96. https://doi.org/10.1080/0020174X.2014.858417Google Scholar

Mandelbaum, E. (2015a) Associationist theories of thought. In Zalta, Edward N. (Ed.). The stanford encyclopedia of philosophy (Summer 2017 Edition. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2017/entries/associationist-thought/Google Scholar

Mandelbaum, E. (2015b) The automatic and the ballistic: modularity beyond perceptual processes. Philosophical Psychology, 28(8), 1147–1156. www.doi.org/10.1080/09515089.2014.950217Google Scholar

Mandelbaum, E. (2016) Attitude, inference, association: on the propositional structure of implicit bias. Noûs, 50(3), 629–658. https://doi.org/10.1111/nous.12089Google Scholar

Mandelbaum, E. (2018) Seeing and conceptualizing: modularity and the shallow contents of perception. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 97(2), 267–283. https://doi.org/10.1111/phpr.12368Google Scholar

Mandelbaum, E. (2019) Troubles with Bayesianism: an introduction to the psychological immune system. Mind & Language, 34(2), 141–157. https://doi.org/10.1111/mila.12205Google Scholar

Mandelbaum, E. (Forthcoming) A psychofunctional theory of belief. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Mandelbaum, E. & Quilty-Dunn, J. (2015). Believing without reason or: why liberals shouldn’t watch Fox News. The Harvard Review of Philosophy, 22, 42–52. https://doi.org/10.5840/harvardreview2015226Google Scholar

Mann, T. C. & Ferguson, M. J. (2015) Can we undo our first impressions? The role of reinterpretation in reversing implicit evaluations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 108(6), 823–849. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspa0000021Google Scholar

Mann, T. C. & Ferguson, M. J. (2017). Reversing implicit first impressions through reinterpretation after a two-day delay. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 68, 122–127. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2016.06.004Google Scholar

Mann, T. C., Kurdi, B., & Banaji, M. R. (2019) How effectively can implicit evaluations be updated? Using evaluative statements after aversive repeated evaluative pairings. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General. Advance Online Publication. https://doi.org/10.1037/xge0000701.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

McHoskey, J. W. (1995) Case closed? On the John F. Kennedy assassination: biased assimilation of evidence and attitude polarization. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 17(3), 395–409. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15324834basp1703_7Google Scholar

McGuire, W. J. (1964). Inducing resistance to persuasion: some contemporary approaches. In Berkowitz, L (Ed.). Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, Vol. 1 (pp. 191–229). Academic Press.Google Scholar

Mercier, H. (2020) Not born yesterday: the science of who we trust and what we believe. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Mollica, F. & Piantadosi, S. (2015). Towards semantically rich and recursive word learning models. Proceedings of the Cognitive Science Conference, 37, 1607–1612.Google Scholar

Nichols, S. (2021) Rational rules: towards a theory of moral learning. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Nielsen, M. & Stewart, R. T. (2020) Persistent disagreement and polarization in a Bayesian setting. The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 72 (1), 51–78.Google Scholar

Núñez, R., Allen, M., Gao, R., Rigoli, C. M., Relaford-Doyle, J., & Semenuks, A. (2019) What happened to cognitive science?. Nature Human Behaviour, 3(8), 782–791. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562–019-0626-2Google Scholar

Onishi, K. H. & Baillargeon, R. (2005) Do 15-month-old infants understand false beliefs? Science, 308(5719), 255–258. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1107621Google Scholar

van Orman Quine, W. & Ullian, J. (1978) The web of belief. Random House.Google Scholar

Ossipov, M. H., Dussor, G. O., & Porreca, F. (2010) Central modulation of pain. Journal of Clinical Investigation, 120(11), 3779–3787. https://doi.org/10.1172/JCI43766Google Scholar

Pennycook, G., Cannon, Tyrone D. & Rand, , David, G. (2018) Prior exposure increases perceived accuracy of fake news. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 147(12), 1865–1880. www.doi.org/10.1037/xge0000465Google Scholar

Pennycook, G., Cheyne, J. A., Barr, N., Koehler, D. J., & Fugelsang, J. A. (2015) On the reception and detection of pseudo-profound bullshit. Judgment and Decision Making, 10(6), 549–563.Google Scholar

Pennycook, G., Epstein, Z., Mosleh, M., Arechar, A. A., Eckles, D., & Rand, D. G. (2021) Shifting attention to accuracy can reduce misinformation online. Nature, 592, 1–6.Google Scholar

Pennycook, G. & Rand, D. G. (2019) Lazy, not biased: susceptibility to partisan fake news is better explained by lack of reasoning than by motivated reasoning. Cognition, 188, 39–50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2018.06.011Google Scholar

Pennycook, G. & Rand, D. G. (2021) The Psychology of Fake News. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 25(5), 388–402.Google Scholar

Pepperberg, I. M., Gray, S. L., Mody, S., Cornero, F. M., & Carey, S. (2019) Logical reasoning by a grey parrot? A case study of the disjunctive syllogism. Behaviour, 156(5–8), 409–445. https://doi.org/10.1163/1568539x-00003528Google Scholar

Petrocelli, J. V., Tormala, Z. L., & Rucker, D. D. (2007) Unpacking attitude certainty: attitude clarity and attitude correctness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 92(1), 30–41. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.92.1.30Google Scholar

Phillips, J., Buckwalter, W., Cushman, F. et al. (2020) Knowledge before belief. Behavioral and Brain Science, 8(44), E140. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X20000618Google Scholar

Piantadosi, S. T., Tenenbaum, J. B., & Goodman, N. D. (2012) Bootstrapping in a language of thought: a formal model of numerical concept learning. Cognition 123(2), 199–217.Google Scholar

Piantadosi, S. T., Tenenbaum, J. B., & Goodman, N. D. (2016) The logical primitives of thought: Empirical foundations for compositional cognitive models. Psychological Review, 123(4), 392–424. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0039980Google Scholar

Porot, N. J. (2019) Some non-human languages of thought. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). City University of New York, Graduate Center.Google Scholar

Povinelli, D. J. & Vonk, J. (2003) Chimpanzee minds: suspiciously human? Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 7(4), 157–160. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1364-6613(03)00053-6Google Scholar

Quilty-Dunn, J. & Mandelbaum, E. (2018a) Against dispositionalism: belief in cognitive science. Philosophical Studies, 175(9), 2353–2372. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11098–017-0962-xGoogle Scholar

Quilty-Dunn, J. & Mandelbaum, E. (2018b) Inferential transitions. Australasian Journal of Philosophy, 96(3), 532–547. https://doi.org/10.1080/00048402.2017.1358754Google Scholar

Rescorla, M. (2016) Bayesian sensorimotor psychology. Mind & Language, 31(1), 3–36.Google Scholar

Ritchie, K. (2016) Can semantics guide ontology? Australasian Journal of Philosophy, 94(1), 24–41. https://doi.org/10.1080/00048402.2015.1045912Google Scholar

Rosati, A. G. & Santos, L. R. (2016) Spontaneous metacognition in rhesus monkeys. Psychological Science, 27(9), 1181–1191. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797616653737Google Scholar

Ross, L. (1977) The intuitive psychologist and his shortcomings: distortions in the attribution process. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 10, 173–220. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065–2601(08)60357-3Google Scholar

Schachter, S. & Singer, J. E. (1962) Cognitive, social, and physiological determinants of emotional state. Psychological Review, 69(5), 379–399. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0046234Google Scholar

Schwitzgebel, E. (2013) A dispositional approach to attitudes: thinking outside of the belief box. In Nottelmann, N. (Ed.). New essays on belief (pp. 75–99). Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137026521_5Google Scholar

Seifert, C. (2002) The continued influence of misinformation in memory: what makes a correction effective? In Ross, B. (Ed.). Psychology of Learning and Motivation, vol. 41 (pp. 265–292). Academic Press.Google Scholar

Singer, D. J., Bramson, A., Grim, P. et al. (2019) Rational social and political polarization. Philosophical Studies, 176(9), 2243–2267.Google Scholar

Skurnik, I., Yoon, C., Park, D. C., & Schwarz, N. (2005) How warnings about false claims become recommendations. Journal of Consumer Research, 31(4), 713–724.Google Scholar

Smith, J. D., Couchman, J. J., & Beran, M. J. (2014). The highs and lows of theoretical interpretation in animal-metacognition research. The Cognitive Neuroscience of Metacognition, 367(1594), 1297–1309. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-45190-4_5Google Scholar

Sperber, D. (1997) Intuitive and reflective beliefs. Mind and Language, 12(1), 67–83.Google Scholar

Sperber, D., Clément, F., Heintz, C. et al. (2010) Epistemic vigilance. Mind and Language, 25 (4), 359–393.Google Scholar

Stich, S. P. (1979) Do animals have beliefs? Australasian Journal of Philosophy, 57(1), 15–28. https://doi.org/10.1080/00048407912341011Google Scholar

Storms, M. D. & Nisbett, R. E. (1970). Insomnia and the attribution process. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 16(2), 319–328. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0029835Google Scholar

Tibbetts, E., Agudelo, J., Pandit, S., & Riojas, J. (2019) Transitive inference in Polistes paper wasps. Biology Letters, 15(5), Article 20190015. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsbl.2019.0015Google Scholar

Tracey, I. (2010) Getting the pain you expect: mechanisms of placebo, nocebo and reappraisal effects in humans. Nature Medicine, 16(11), 1277–1283. https://doi.org/10.1038/nm.2229CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Tracy, R. Young, S. Porot, N., & Mandelbaum, E. (under review) Disfluency Attenuates the Reception of Pseudoprofound and Postmodernist Bullshit.Google Scholar

Trouche, E., Johansson, P., Hall, L., & Mercier, H. (2016) The selective laziness of reasoning. Cognitive Science 40(8), 2122–2136.Google Scholar

Unkelbach, C. & Rom, S. C. (2017) A referential theory of the repetition-induced truth effect. Cognition, 160, 110–126. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2016.12.016Google Scholar

Van Dessel, P., De Houwer, J., Gast, A., Smith, C. T., & De Schryver, M. (2016) Instructing implicit processes: when instructions to approach or avoid influence implicit but not explicit evaluation. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 63, 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2015.11.002Google Scholar

Van Dessel, P., Ye, Y., & De Houwer, J. (2019) Changing deep-rooted implicit evaluation in the blink of an eye: negative verbal information shifts automatic liking of Gandhi. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 10(2), 266–273. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550617752064Google Scholar

Van Leeuwen, N. (2014) Religious credence is not factual belief. Cognition, 133(3), 698–715. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2014.08.015Google Scholar

Van Leeuwen, N. (2017) Two paradigms for religious representation: the physicist and the playground (a reply to Levy). Cognition, 164, 206–211. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2017.03.021Google Scholar

Vogel, T., Silva, R. R., Thomas, A., & Wänke, M. (2020) Truth is in the mind, but beauty is in the eye: fluency effects are moderated by a match between fluency source and judgment dimension. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 149(8), 1587–1596. doi:10.1037/xge0000731Google Scholar

Vul, E., Goodman, N., Griffiths, T. L., & Tenenbaum, J. B. (2014). One and done? Optimal decisions from very few samples. Cognitive Science, 38(4), 599–637. https://doi.org/10.1111/cogs.12101Google Scholar

Vul, E. & Pashler, H. (2008) Measuring the crowd within: probabilistic representations within individuals. Psychological Science, 19(7), 645–647. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008.02136.xGoogle Scholar

Waber, R. L., Shiv, B., Carmon, Z., & Ariely, D. (2008) Commercial features of placebo and therapeutic. Journal of the American Medical Association, 299(9), 1016–1017. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.299.9.1016Google Scholar

Watson, A., Power, A., Brown, C., El-Deredy, W., & Jones, A. (2012) Placebo analgesia: cognitive influences on therapeutic outcome. Arthritis Research & Therapy, 14, Article 206. https://doi.org/10.1186/ar3783.Google Scholar

Weisberg, J. (2020) Belief in psyontology. Philosophers’ Imprint, 20(11), 1–27.Google Scholar

Webster, D. M. & Kruglanski, A. W. (1994) Individual differences in need for cognitive closure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67(6), 1049–1062. https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-3514.67.6.1049Google Scholar

Wegner, D. M., Coulton, G. F., & Wenzlaff, R. (1985) The transparency of denial: briefing in the debriefing paradigm. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 49(2), 338–346.Google Scholar

Whissel, C., Abramson, C. I., & Barber, K. I. (2013) The search for cognitive terminology: an analysis of comparative psychology journal titles. Behavioral Sciences, 3(1), 133–142.Google Scholar

Wiklund, R. A. & Rosenbaum, S. H. (1997) Anesthesiology (part one of two). New England Journal of Medicine, 337(17), 1215–1219. https://doi.org/10.1056/nejm199710233371707Google Scholar

Zanna, M. & Cooper, J. (1974) Dissonance and the pill: an attribution approach to studying the arousal properties of dissonance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 29(5), 703–709. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0036651Google Scholar

Zettlemoyer, L. S. & Collins, M. (2005) Learning to map sentences to logical form: Structured classification with probabilistic categorical grammars. Proceedings of the 21st Conference on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence, pp. 658–666.Google Scholar

Alloy, L. B. & Abramson, L. Y. (1979) Judgment of contingency in depressed and nondepressed students: sadder but wiser? Journal of Experimental Psychology General, 108(4) 441–485.Google Scholar

American Psychiatric Association (APA). (2013) Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (5th Ed.). APA.Google Scholar

Bandura, A. (1989) Human agency in social cognitive theory. American Psychologist, 44(9), 1174–1184.Google Scholar

Bortolotti, L. (2009) Delusions and other irrational beliefs. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Bortolotti, L. (2014) Irrationality. Polity Press.Google Scholar

Bortolotti, L. (2018) Stranger than fiction: costs and benefits of everyday confabulation. Review of Philosophy and Psychology, 9(2) 227–249.Google Scholar

Bortolotti, L. (2020) The epistemic innocence of irrational Beliefs. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Bortolotti, L. & Antrobus, M. (2014) Costs and benefits of realism and optimism. Current Opinion in Psychiatry, 28(2), 194–198.Google Scholar

Bortolotti, L., Antrobus, M., & Sullivan-Bissett, E. (2019) The epistemic innocence of optimistically biased beliefs. In Balcerak Jackson, M. and Balcerak Jackson, B. (Eds.). Reasoning: new essays on theoretical and practical thinking. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Bortolotti, L., Broome, M., & Mameli, M. (2014) Delusions and responsibility for action: insights from the Breivik case. Neuroethics, 7(3), 377–382.Google Scholar

Bortolotti, L., Ichino, A., & Mameli, M. (2021) Conspiracy Theories and Delusions. Reti, Saperi e Linguaggi 2 (VIII), 183–200.Google Scholar

Bortolotti, L. & Sullivan-Bissett, E. (2021) Is choice blindness a case of self-ignorance? Synthese, 198(6), 5437–5454.Google Scholar

Brewster, Z. W. & Rusche, S. N. (2012) Quantitative evidence of the continuing significance of race: tableside racism in full-service restaurants. Journal of Black Studies, 43(4), 359–384.Google Scholar

Broome, M. R., Bortolotti, L., & Mameli, M. (2010) Moral responsibility and mental illness: a case study. Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics, 19(2), 179–187.Google Scholar

Brown, J. K., Waltz, J. A., Straus, G. P., McMahon, R. P., Frank, M. J., & Gold, J. M. (2013) Hypothetical decision making in schizophrenia: the role of expected value computation and “irrational” biases. Psychiatry Research 209(2), 142–149.Google Scholar

Craigie, J. & Bortolotti, L. (2014) Rationality, diagnosis, and patient autonomy in psychiatry. In Sadler, John Z., Fulford, K. W. M., & van Staden, Werdie (C. W.) (Eds.). The oxford handbook of psychiatric ethics (pp. 387–404) Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Damasio, A. R. (1996) The somatic marker hypothesis and the possible functions of the prefrontal cortex. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, 351(1346), 1413–1420.Google Scholar

Ellis, H. & Young, A. (1990) Accounting for delusional misidentifications. British Journal of Psychiatry, 157(2), 239–248. https://doi.org/10.1192/bjp.157.2.239Google Scholar

Fricker, M. (2007) Epistemic injustice: power and the ethics of knowledge. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Garrett, N., Sharot, T., Faulkner, P., et al. (2014) Losing the rose tinted glasses: neural substrates of unbiased belief updating in depression. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 8: 639.Google Scholar

Gigerenzer, G. & Todd, P. M. (1999) Simple heuristics that make us smart. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Hemmens, C., Miller, M., Burton, V. S. Jr., & Milner, S. (2002) The consequences of official labels: an examination of the rights lost by the mentally ill and mentally incompetent ten years later. Community Mental Health Journal, 38(2), 129–140.Google Scholar

Hirstein, W. (2005) Brain fiction: self-deception and the riddle of confabulation. MIT Press.Google Scholar

Jurjako, M. & Malatesti, L. (2016) Instrumental rationality in psychopathy: implications from learning tasks, Philosophical Psychology, 29( 5), 717–731.Google Scholar

Kemp, R., Chua, S., McKenna, P., & David, A. (1997) Reasoning and delusions. The British Journal of Psychiatry, 170(5), 398–405.Google Scholar

McKay, R., Langdon, R., & Coltheart, M. (2005) “Sleights of mind”: delusions, defences, and self-deception. Cognitive Neuropsychiatry, 10(4), 305–326.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Mellet, E., Houdé, O., Brazo, P., Mazoyer, B., Tzourio-Mazoyer, N., & Dollfus, S. (2006) When a schizophrenic deficit becomes a reasoning advantage. Schizophrenia Research, 84(2–3), 359–364.Google Scholar

Mirian, D. R., Heinrichs, W., & McDermid Vaz, S. (2011) Exploring logical reasoning abilities in schizophrenic patients. Schizophrenia Research, 127(1–3), 178–180.Google Scholar

Miyazono, K. & Bortolotti, L. (2021) philosophy of psychology: an introduction. Polity Press.Google Scholar

Nisbett, R. E. & Ross, L. (1980) Human inference: strategies and shortcomings in social judgement. Prentice Hall.Google Scholar

Nisbett, R. E. & Wilson, T. D. (1977) Telling more than we can know: verbal reports on mental processes. Psychological Review, 84(3), 231–259.Google Scholar

Owen, G. S., Cutting, J., & David, A. S. (2007) Are people with schizophrenia more logical than healthy volunteers? British Journal of Psychiatry, 191(5), 453–454.Google Scholar

Pierre, J. M. (2020) Mistrust and misinformation: a two-component, socio-epistemic model of belief in conspiracy theories. Journal of Social and Political Psychology, 8(2), 617–641.Google Scholar

Ramachandran, V. S. (1995) Anosognosia in parietal lobe syndrome. Conscious Cognition 4(1), 22–51.Google Scholar

Revsbech, R., Mortensen, E. L., Owen, G. et al. (2015) Exploring rationality in schizophrenia. British Journal of Psychiatry Open, 1(1), 98–103.Google Scholar

Ritunnano, R., Humpston, C., & Broome, M. (2021) Finding order within the disorder: a case study exploring the meaningfulness of delusions. BJPsych Bulletin, 46(2), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1192/bjb.2020.151Google Scholar

Shepperd, J. A., Klein, W. M. P., Waters, E. A., & Weinstein, N. D. (2013) Taking stock of unrealistic optimism. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 8(4), 395–411.Google Scholar

Stanovich, Keith E. & West, Richard F. (2000) Individual differences in reasoning: Implications for the rationality debate? Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 23(5) 645–665.Google Scholar

Stein, E. (1996) Without good reason: the rationality debate in philosophy and cognitive science. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Sullivan-Bissett, E. (2015) Implicit bias, confabulation, and epistemic innocence. Consciousness and Cognition, 33, 548–560.Google Scholar

Sweeny, K., Carroll, P. J., & Shepperd, J. A. (2006) Is optimism always best? Future outlooks and preparedness. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 15(6), 302–306.Google Scholar

Tiberius, V. (2008) The reflective life: living wisely with our limits. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

World Health Organization (2004) International statistical classification of diseases and related health problems, tenth revision (ICD-10), 2nd ed. World Health Organization.Google Scholar

Alba, J. W. & Hasher, L. (1983) Is memory schematic? Psychological Bulletin, 93(2), 203–231. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.93.2.203Google Scholar

Allred, S. R., Crawford, L. E., Duffy, S., & Smith, J. (2016) Working memory and spatial judgments: cognitive load increases the central tendency bias. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 23(6), 1825–1831. http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/s13423–016-1039-0Google Scholar

Anderson, J. R. (1990) The adaptive character of thought. Psychology Press.Google Scholar

Anderson, J. R. (1991) Is human cognition adaptive? Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 14(3), 471–485.Google Scholar

Anderson, J. R. (1993) The rules of the mind. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar

Anderson, J. R. & Milson, R. (1989) Human memory: an adaptive perspective. Psychological Review, 96(4), 703–719. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.96.4.703Google Scholar

Anderson, J. R. & Schooler, L. J. (1991) Reflections of the environment in memory. Psychological Sience, 2(6), 396–408.Google Scholar

Ausubel, D. P. & Fitzgerald, D. (1962) Organizer, general background, and antecedent learning variables in sequential verbal learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 53(6), 243–249.Google Scholar

Bae, G.-Y., Olkkonen, M., Allred, S. R., & Flombaum, J. I. (2015) Why some colors appear more memorable than others: a model combining categories and particulars in color working memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 144(4), 744–763. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/xge0000076Google Scholar

Bangerter, A. (2000) Transformation between scientific and social representations of conception: the method of serial reproduction. British Journal of Social Psychology, 39(4), 521–535.Google Scholar

Bartlett, F. C. & Bartlett, F. C. (1932) Remembering: a study in experimental and social psychology. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Berens, S. C., Richards, B. A., & Horner, A. J. (2020) Dissociating memory accessibility and precision in forgetting. Nature Human Behaviour, 4(8), 866–877. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41562-020-0888-8Google Scholar

Brady, T. F. & Alvarez, G. A. (2011) Hierarchical encoding in visual working memory: ensemble statistics bias memory for individual items. Psychological Science, 22(3), 384–392.Google Scholar

Brady, T. F., Konkle, T., Gill, J., Oliva, A., & Alvarez, G. A. (2013) Visual long-term memory has the same limit on fidelity as visual working memory. Psychological Science, 24(6), 981–990. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0956797612465439Google Scholar

Brady, T. F. & Oliva, A. (2008) Statistical learning using real-world scenes: extracting categorical regularities without conscious intent. Psychogical Science, 19, 678–685 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008.02142.xGoogle Scholar

Brewer, W. F. & Treyens, J. C. (1981) Role of schemata in memory for places. Cognitive Psychology, 13(2), 207–230. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0010-0285(81)90008-6Google Scholar

Brown, B. R. & Evans, S. H. (1969) Perceptual learning in pattern discrimination tasks with two and three schema categories. Psychonomic Science, 15(2), 101–103. http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/BF03336223Google Scholar

de Gardelle, V. & Summerfield, C. (2011) Robust averaging during perceptual judgment. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 108(32), 13341–13346. http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1104517108Google Scholar

Djonlagic, I., Rosenfeld, A., Shohamy, D., Myers, C., Gluck, M., & Stickgold, R. (2009) Sleep enhances category learning. Learning & Memory, 16(12), 751–755. http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/lm.1634509Google Scholar

Duffy, S., Huttenlocher, J., Hedges, L. V., & Crawford, L. E. (2010) Category effects on stimulus estimation: Shifting and skewed frequency distributions. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 17(2), 224–230. http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/PBR.17.2.224Google Scholar

Durrant, S. J., Cairney, S. A., McDermott, C., & Lewis, P. A. (2015) Schema-conformant memories are preferentially consolidated during REM sleep. Neurobiology of Learning and Memory, 122, 41–50. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.nlm.2015.02.011Google Scholar

Durrant, S. J., Taylor, C., Cairney, S., & Lewis, P. A. (2011) Sleep-dependent consolidation of statistical learning. Neuropsychologia, 49(5), 1322–1331. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2011.02.015Google Scholar

Ebbinghaus, H. (1885) Über das gedächtnis: untersuchungen zur experimentellen psychologie. Duncker & Humblot.Google Scholar

Estes, W.K. (1955) Statistical theory of distributed phenomena in learning. Psychological Review, 62(5), 369–377.Google Scholar

Eckstein, M. P., Abbey, C. K., Pham, B. T., & Shimozaki, S. S. (2004) Perceptual learning through optimization of attentional weighting: human versus optimal Bayesian learner. Journal of Vision, 4(12), 1006–1019. https://doi.org/10.1167/4.12.3Google Scholar

Epstein, R. A. (2008) Parahippocampal and retrosplenial contributions to human spatial navigation. Trends in Cognitve Science, 12(10), 388–396. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2008.07.004Google Scholar

Feldman, N. H., Griffiths, T. L., & Morgan, J. L. (2009) The influence of categories on perception: explaining the perceptual magnet effect as optimal statistical inference. Psychological Review, 116(4), 752–782. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0017196Google Scholar

Fischhoff, B. (1975) Hindsight is not equal to foresight: the effect of outcome knowledge on judgment under uncertainty. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 1(3), 288–299. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0096-1523.1.3.288Google Scholar

Galleguillos, C. & Belongie, S. (2010) Context based object categorization: a critical survey. Computer Vision and Image Understanding, 114(6), 712–722. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cviu.2010.02.004Google Scholar

Graesser, A. C. & Nakamura, G. V. (1982) The impact of a schema on comprehension and memory. In Bower, G. H. (Ed.). The psychology of learning and motivation (Vol. 16) (pp. 59–109). Academic Press.Google Scholar

Griffiths, T. L. & Kalish, M. L. (2005) A Bayesian view of language evolution by iterated learning. In Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society (Vol. 27, No. 27).Google Scholar

Griffiths, T. L., Lieder, F., & Goodman, N. D. (2015) Rational use of cognitive resources: levels of analysis between the computational and the algorithmic. Topics in Cognitive Science, 7(2), 217–229.Google Scholar

Griffiths, T. L. & Tenenbaum, J. B. (2005) Structure and strength in causal induction. Cognitive Psychology, 51(4), 354–384.Google Scholar

Griffiths, T. L. & Tenenbaum, J. B. (2006) Optimal predictions in everyday cognition. Psychological Science, 17(9), 767–773. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2006.01780.xGoogle Scholar

Griffiths, T. L. & Tenenbaum, J. B. (2007) From mere coincidences to meaningful discoveries. Cognition, 103(2), 180–226.Google Scholar

Haberman, J. & Whitney, D. (2010) The visual system discounts emotional deviants when extracting average expression. Attention, Perception & Psychophysics, 72(7), 1825–1838. http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/APP.72.7.1825Google Scholar

Hardt, O. & Pohl, R. (2003) Hindsight bias as a function of anchor distance and anchor plausibility. Memory, 11(4–5), 379–394. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09658210244000504Google Scholar

Hemmer, P. & Steyvers, M. (2009a) Integrating episodic and semantic information in memory for natural scenes. In Taatgen, N. A. and van Rijn, H. (Eds.). Proceedings of the 31tst Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society, (pp. 1557–1562). Cognitive Science Society.Google Scholar

Hemmer, P. & Steyvers, M. (2009b) A Bayesian account of reconstructive memory. Topics in Cognitive Science, 1(1), 189–202. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1756-8765.2008.01010.xGoogle Scholar

Hemmer, P. & Persaud, K. (2014) Interaction between categorical knowledge and episodic memory across domains. Frontiers in Psychology, 5. http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00584Google Scholar

Huttenlocher, J., Hedges, L. V., & Duncan, S. (1991) Categories and particulars: prototype effects in estimating spatial location. Psychological Review, 98(3), 352–376. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0033-295x.98.3.352Google Scholar

Huttenlocher, J., Hedges, L. V., & Vevea, J. L. (2000) Why do categories affect stimulus judgment? Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 129(2), 220–241. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0096-3445.129.2.220Google Scholar

Kashima, Y. (2000) Maintaining cultural stereotypes in the serial reproduction of narratives. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 26(5), 594–604.Google Scholar

Kruschke, J. K. (1996) Base rates in category learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 22(1), 3–26. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.22.1.3Google Scholar

Körding, K. P. & Wolpert, D. M. (2006). Bayesian decision theory in sensorimotor control. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 10(7), 319–326.Google Scholar

Lew, T. F. & Vul, E. (2015) Ensemble clustering in visual working memory biases location memories and reduces the Weber noise of relative positions. Journal of Vision, 15(4), 1–14. http://dx.doi.org/10.1167/15.4.10Google Scholar

Lieder, F., Griffiths, T. L., M. Huys, Q. J., & Goodman, N. D. (2017) The anchoring bias reflects rational use of cognitive resources. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 25(1), 322–349. http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/s13423–017-1286-8Google Scholar

Magnussen, S. & Dyrnes, S. (1994) High-fidelity perceptual long-term memory. Psychological Science, 5(2), 99–102. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.1994.tb00638.xGoogle Scholar

Marr, D. (1982) Vision: a computational investigation into the human representation and processing of visual information. Freeman.Google Scholar

Mayer, R. E. (1979) Can advance organizers influence meaningful learning? Review of Educational Research, 49(2), 371–383. http://dx.doi.org/10.3102/00346543049002371Google Scholar

McClelland, J. L., McNaughton, B. L., & O’Reilly, R. C. (1995) Why there are complementary learning systems in the hippocampus and neocortex: insights from the successes and failures of connectionist models of learning and memory. Psychological Review, 102(3), 419–457. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.102.3.419Google Scholar

McClelland, J. L. & Rogers, T. T. (2003) The parallel distributed processing approach to semantic cognition. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 4(4), 310–322. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nrn1076Google Scholar

Mesoudi, A. (2007) Using the methods of experimental social psychology to study cultural evolution. Journal of Social, Evolutionary, and Cultural Psychology, 1(2), 35–38.Google Scholar

Minsky, M. (1975) A framework for representing knowledge. In Winston, P. H. (Ed.). The psychology of computer vision (pp. 211–277). McGraw Hill.Google Scholar

Mitterer, H. & de Ruiter, J. P. (2008) Recalibrating color categories using world knowledge. Psychological Science, 19(7), 629–634. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008.02133.xGoogle Scholar

Moscovitch, M., Rosenbaum, R. S., Gilboa, A. et al. (2005) Functional neuroanatomy of remote episodic, semantic and spatial memory: a unified account based on multiple trace theory. Journal of Anatomy, 207(1), 35–66. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7580.2005.00421.xGoogle Scholar

Nissen, M. J. and Bullemer, P. (1987) Attentional requirements of learning: evidence from performance measures. Cognitive Psychology, 19(1), 1–32. doi: 10.1016/0010-0285(87)90002-8Google Scholar

Oaksford, M. & Chater, N. (1996) Rational explanation of the selection task. Psychological Review, 103(2), 381–391. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.103.2.381Google Scholar

Orhan, A. E. & Jacobs, R. A. (2013) A probabilistic clustering theory of the organization of visual short-term memory. Psychological Review, 120(2), 297–328. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0031541Google Scholar

Parpart, P., Jones, M., & Love, B. C. (2018) Heuristics as Bayesian inference under extreme priors. Cognitive Psychology, 102, 127–144. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cogpsych.2017.11.006Google Scholar

Patterson, K., Nestor, P. J., & Rogers, T. T. (2007) Where do you know what you know? The representation of semantic knowledge in the human brain. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 8(12), 976–987. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nrn2277Google Scholar

Persaud, K. & Hemmer, P. (2014) The influence of knowledge and expectations for color on episodic memory. In Bello, P., Guarini, M., McShane, M., & Scassellati, B. (Eds.). Proceedings of the 36th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society. Cognitive Science Society.Google Scholar

Persaud, K. & Hemmer, P. (2016) The dynamics of fidelity over the time course of long-term memory. Cognitive Psychology, 88, 1–21. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cogpsych.2016.05.003Google Scholar

Popov, V., Zhang, Q., Koch, G. E., Calloway, R. C., & Coutanche, M. N. (2019) Semantic knowledge influences whether novel episodic associations are represented symmetrically or asymmetrically. Memory & Cognition, 47(8), 1567–1581.Google Scholar

Posner, M. I. & Keele, S. W. (1968) On the genesis of abstract ideas. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 77(3, Pt.1), 353–363. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/h0025953Google Scholar

Raaijmakers, J. G. & Shiffrin, R. M. (1981) Search of associative memory. Psychological Review, 88(2), 93–134.Google Scholar

Richards, B. A., Xia, F., Santoro, A. et al. (2014) Patterns across multiple memories are identified over time. Nature Neuroscience, 17(7), 981–986. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nn.3736Google Scholar

Richter, F. R., Bays, P. M., Jeyarathnarajah, P., & Simons, J. S. (2019) Flexible updating of dynamic knowledge structures. Scientific Reports, 9(1), 1–15.http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598–019-39468-9Google Scholar

Roediger, H. L. & McDermott, K. B. (1995) Creating false memories: Remembering words not presented in lists. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 21(4), 803–814.Google Scholar

Schank, R. C. & Abelson, R. P. (1977) Scripts, plans, goals, and understanding: an inquiry into human knowledge structures. Psychology Press.Google Scholar

Schooler, L. J. & Anderson, J. R. (1997) The role of process in the rational analysis of memory. Cognitive Psychology, 32(3), 219–250. http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/cogp.1997.0652Google Scholar

Schulman, A. I. (1974) Memory for words recently classified. Memory & Cognition, 2(1), 47–52. http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/BF03197491Google Scholar

Simon, H. A. (1955) A behavioral model of rational choice. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 69(1): 99–118. https://doi.org/10.2307/1884852Google Scholar

Steyvers, M. & Griffiths, T. L. (2008) Rational analysis as a link between human memory and information retrieval. In Chater, N & Oaksford, M (Eds.). The probabilistic mind: prospects for Bayesian cognitive science (pp. 329–349). Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Steyvers, M., Griffiths, T. L., & Dennis, S. (2006) Probabilistic inference in human semantic memory. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 10(7), 327–334.Google Scholar

Steyvers, M. & Hemmer, P. (2012). Reconstruction from memory in naturalistic environments. In Psychology of learning and motivation, vol. 56 (pp. 125–144). Academic Press.Google Scholar

Steyvers, M., Tenenbaum, J. B., Wagenmakers, E. J., & Blum, B. (2003) Inferring causal networks from observations and interventions. Cognitive Science, 27(3), 453–489.Google Scholar

Sweegers, C. C. G., Coleman, G. A., van Poppel, E. A. M., Cox, R., & Talamini, L. M. (2015) Mental schemas hamper memory storage of goal-irrelevant information. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 9. http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2015.00629Google Scholar

Sweegers, C. C. G. & Talamini, L. M. (2014) Generalization from episodic memories across time: a route for semantic knowledge acquisition. Cortex, 59, 49–61. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cortex.2014.07.006Google Scholar

Synodinos, N. E. (1986) Hindsight distortion: i knew it- all-along and I was sure about it. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 16(2), 107–117.Google Scholar

Taylor, S. E. & Crocker, J. (1981) Schematic bases of social information processing. In Higgins, E. T., Herman, C. P., & Zanna, M. P. (Eds.). Social cognition: the Ontario symposium, Vol. 1(pp. 89–134). Erlbaum.Google Scholar

Todorovic, D. (2010) Context effects in visual perception and their explanations. Review of Psychology 17(1), 17–32.Google Scholar

Tompary, A. & Thompson-Schill, S. L. (2021) Semantic influences on episodic memory distortions. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 150(9), 1800–1824. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/xge0001017Google Scholar

Tompary, A., Zhou, W., & Davachi, L. (2020) Schematic memories develop quickly, but are not expressed unless necessary. Scientific Reports, 10(1), 1–17. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598–020-73952-xGoogle Scholar

Torralba, A. (2003) Contextual priming for object detection. International Journal of Computer Vision 53(2), 169–191. http://dxdoi.org/10.1023/A:1023052124951Google Scholar

Trueswell, J. C. (1996) The role of lexical frequency in syntactic ambiguity resolution. Journal of Memory and Language, 35(4), 566–585. http://dxdoi.org/10.1006/jmla.1996.0030Google Scholar

Tse, D., Langston, R. F., Kakeyama, M. et al. (2007) Schemas and memory consolidation. Science, 316(5821), 76–82. http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.1135935Google Scholar

Tulving, E. (1983) Elements of episodic memory. Clarendon.Google Scholar

Tulving, E. & Markowitsch, H. J. (1998) Episodic and declarative memory: role of the hippocampus. Hippocampus, 8(3), 198–204.Google Scholar

van Kesteren, M. T., Rignanese, P, Gianferrara, P. G, Krabbendam, L, & Meeter, M (2020) Congruency and reactivation aid memory integration through reinstatement of prior knowledge. Scientific Reports, 10(1), 1–13.Google Scholar

van Kesteren, M. T. R., Rijpkema, M., Ruiter, D. J., & Fernandez, G. (2010) Retrieval of associative information congruent with prior knowledge is related to increased medial prefrontal activity and connectivity. Journal of Neuroscience, 30(47), 15888–15894. http://dx.doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2674-10.2010Google Scholar

van Kesteren, M. T. R., Rijpkema, M., Ruiter, D. J., & Fernández, G. (2013) Consolidation differentially modulates schema effects on memory for items and associations. PLoS ONE, 8(2), e56155. http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0056155Google Scholar

Wagner, U., Gais, S., Haider, H., Verleger, R., & Born, J. (2004) Sleep inspires insight. Nature, 427(6972), 352–355. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature02223Google Scholar

Wilson, S., Arora, S., Zhang, Q., & Griffiths, T.L. (2021) A rational account of anchor effects in hindsight bias. Proceedings of the 43th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (Vol. 43, No. 43).Google Scholar

Xu, J. & Griffiths, T. L. (2010) A rational analysis of the effects of memory biases on serial reproduction. Cognitive psychology, 60(2), 107–126.Google Scholar

Zeng, T., Tompary, A., Schapiro, A. C., & Thompson-Schill, S. (2021) Tracking the relation between gist and item memory over the course of long-term memory consolidation. eLife 10:e65588. https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.65588Google Scholar

Zhang, Q., Griffiths, T. & Norman, K. (in press). Optimal policies for free recall. Psychological Review.Google Scholar

Zhang, Q., Popov, V., Koch, G. E., Calloway, R. C., & Coutanche, M. N. (2018) Fast memory integration facilitated by schema consistency. Proceedings of the 40th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 2777–2782). Cognitive Science Society.Google Scholar

Barsalou, L. W. (1983) Ad hoc categories. Memory & Cognition, 11(3), 211–227.Google Scholar

Bigelow, E. J. & Piantadosi, S. T. (2016a) Inferring priors in compositional cognitive models. In Proceedings of the 38th Cognitive Science Society.Google Scholar

Bigelow, E. J. & Piantadosi, S. T. (2016b) A large dataset of generalization patterns in the number game. Journal of Open Psychology Data, 4(1), e4–e4.Google Scholar

Boole, G. (1854) An investigation of the laws of thought: on which are founded the mathematical theories of logic and probabilities. Walton and Maberly.Google Scholar

Burris, S. (2000) The laws of Boole’s thought. Preprint.Google Scholar

Chater, N. & Vitányi, P. (2007) Ideal learning of natural language: positive results about learning from positive evidence. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 51(3), 135–163.Google Scholar

Denison, S. & Xu, F. (2014) The origins of probabilistic inference in human infants. Cognition, 130(3), 335–347.Google Scholar

Depeweg, S., Rothkopf, C. A., & Jäkel, F. (2018) Solving bongard problems with a visual language and pragmatic reasoning. arXiv preprint arXiv:1804.04452.Google Scholar

Eckert, J., Call, J., Hermes, J., Herrmann, E., & Rakoczy, H. (2018) Intuitive statistical inferences in chimpanzees and humans follow Weber’s law. Cognition, 180, 99–107.Google Scholar

Fodor, J. (1975) The language of thought. Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Fodor, J. & Pylyshyn, Z. (1988) Connectionism and cognitive architecture: a critical analysis. Cognition, 28, 3–71.Google Scholar

Gershman, S. J. (2017) On the blessing of abstraction. SAGE.Google Scholar

Gigerenzer, G. & Selten, R. (2002) Bounded rationality: the adaptive toolbox. MIT Press.Google Scholar

Goodman, N. D., Frank, M. C., Griffiths, T. L., Tenenbaum, J. B., Battaglia, P. W., & Hamrick, J. B. (2015) Relevant and robust: a response to Marcus and Davis (2013). Psychological Science, 26(4), 539–541.Google Scholar

Goodman, N. D., Tenenbaum, J., Feldman, J., & Griffiths, T. (2008) A rational analysis of rule-based concept learning. Cognitive Science, 32(1), 108–154.Google Scholar

Goodman, N. D., Tenenbaum, J. B., & Gerstenberg, T. (2015) Concepts in a probabilistic language of thought. In Margolis, E & Laurence, S (Eds.), The conceptual mind: new directions in the study of concepts. MIT Press.Google Scholar

Goodman, N. D., Ullman, T. D., & Tenenbaum, J. B. (2011) Learning a theory of causality. Psychological Review, 118(1), 110–119.Google Scholar

Griffiths, T. L., Lieder, F., & Goodman, N. D. (2015) Rational use of cognitive resources: levels of analysis between the computational and the algorithmic. Topics in Cognitive Science, 7(2), 217–229.Google Scholar

Heinze-Deml, C., Maathuis, M. H., & Meinshausen, N. (2018) Causal structure learning. Annual Review of Statistics and Its Application, 5(1), 371–391.Google Scholar

Hutter, M. (2005) Universal artificial intelligence: sequential decisions based on algorithmic probability. Springer Science & Business Media.Google Scholar

Jaynes, E. (2003) Probability theory: the logic of science. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Jones, M. & Love, B. C. (2011) Bayesian fundamentalism or enlightenment? On the explanatory status and theoretical contributions of Bayesian models of cognition. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 34(4), 169–231.Google Scholar

Katz, Y. & Springer, M. (2016) Probabilistic adaptation in changing microbial environments. PeerJ, 4, e2716.Google Scholar

Katz, Y., Springer, M., & Fontana, W. (2018) Embodying probabilistic inference in biochemical circuits. arXiv preprint arXiv:1806.10161.Google Scholar

Kemp, C. & Tenenbaum, J. (2008) The discovery of structural form. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 105(31), 10687–10692.Google Scholar

Kemp, C., Tenenbaum, J. B., Niyogi, S., & Griffiths, T. L. (2010) A probabilistic model of theory formation. Cognition, 114(2), 165–196.Google Scholar

Kidd, C., Piantadosi, S. T., & Aslin, R. (2012) The Goldilocks effect: human infants allocate attention to visual sequences that are neither too simple nor too complex. PLoS ONE 7(5), e36399.Google Scholar

Kidd, C., Piantadosi, S. T., & Aslin, R. N. (2014) The goldilocks effect in infant auditory attention. Child Development, 85(5), 1795–1804.Google Scholar

Knill, D. (1996) Perception as Bayesian inference. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Kolmogorov, A. (1950) Foundations of the theory of probability. Chelsea Publishing Company.Google Scholar

Lake, B. M., Salakhutdinov, R., & Tenenbaum, J. B. (2015). Human-level concept learning through probabilistic program induction. Science, 350(6266), 1332–1338.Google Scholar

Marcus, G. F. & Davis, E. (2013) How robust are probabilistic models of higher-level cognition? Psychological science, 24(12), 2351–2360.Google Scholar

Marcus, G. F. & Davis, E. (2015) Still searching for principles: a response to Goodman et al. (2015). Psychological Science, 26 (4), 542–544.Google Scholar

Musolino, J., d’Agostino, K. L., & Piantadosi, S. T. (2019) Why we should abandon the semantic subset principle. Language Learning and Development, 15(1), 32–46.Google Scholar

Nilsson, N. J. (2009). The quest for artificial intelligence. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Overlan, M. C., Jacobs, R. A., & Piantadosi, S. T. (2017) Learning abstract visual concepts via probabilistic program induction in a language of thought. Cognition, 168, 320–334.Google Scholar

Piantadosi, S. T. (2011) Learning and the language of thought (Doctoral dissertation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology).Google Scholar

Piantadosi, S. T. & Jacobs, R. (2016) Four problems solved by the probabilistic language of thought. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 25(1), 54–59.Google Scholar

Piantadosi, S. T., Kidd, C., & Aslin, R. (2014) Rich analysis and rational models: inferring individual behavior from infant looking data. Developmental Science, 17, 321–337.Google Scholar

Piantadosi, S. T., Tenenbaum, J., & Goodman, N. (2012) Bootstrapping in a language of thought: a formal model of numerical concept learning. Cognition, 123(2), 199–217.Google Scholar

Piantadosi, S. T., Tenenbaum, J., & Goodman, N. (2016) The logical primitives of thought: Empirical foundations for compositional cognitive models. Psychological Review, 123(4), 392–424.Google Scholar

Rakoczy, H., Clüver, A., Saucke, L. et al. (2014) Apes are intuitive statisticians. Cognition, 131(1), 60–68.Google Scholar

Ramsey, F. P. (1926) Truth and probability. In Readings in formal epistemology (pp. 21–45). Springer.Google Scholar

Rothe, A., Lake, B. M., & Gureckis, T. (2017) Question asking as program generation. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 1047–1056.Google Scholar

Rule, J., Tenenbaum, J., & Piantadosi, S. (2020) The child as hacker. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 24(11), 900–915.Google Scholar

Russell, S. & Norvig, P. (2009) Artificial intelligence: a modern approach. Prentice Hall.Google Scholar

Saffran, J., Aslin, R., & Newport, E. (1996) Statistical learning by 8-month-old infants. Science, 274(5294), 1926–1928.Google Scholar

Saffran, J., Johnson, E. K., Aslin, R. N., & Newport, E. L. (1999) Statistical learning of tone sequences by human infants and adults. Cognition, 70(1), 27–52.Google Scholar

Savage, L. J. (1954) The Foundations of Statistics. New York, Wiley.Google Scholar

Shepard, R. N. (1980) Multidimensional scaling, tree-fitting, and clustering. Science, 210(4468), 390–398.Google Scholar

Sides, A., Osherson, D., Bonini, N., & Viale, R. (2002) On the reality of the conjunction fallacy. Memory & Cognition, 30(2), 191–198.Google Scholar

Solomonoff, R. J. (1964a) A formal theory of inductive inference. Part I. Information and Control, 7(1), 1–22.Google Scholar

Solomonoff, R. J. (1964b) A formal theory of inductive inference. Part II. Information and control, 7(2), 224–254.Google Scholar

Talbott, W. (2016) Bayesian Epistemology. In Zalta, E. N. (Ed.). The stanford encyclopedia of philosophy (Winter 2016 ed.). Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University.Google Scholar

Tecwyn, E. C., Denison, S., Messer, E. J., & Buchsbaum, D. (2017) Intuitive probabilistic inference in capuchin monkeys. Animal Cognition, 20(2), 243–256.Google Scholar