Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-b95js Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-04T22:46:38.135Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

5 - Symmetries, Subgrid-Scale Modeling, and Coarse Graining

from Part I - Paradigms and Tools

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 January 2025

Fernando F. Grinstein
Affiliation:
Los Alamos National Laboratory
Filipe S. Pereira
Affiliation:
Los Alamos National Laboratory
Massimo Germano
Affiliation:
Duke University, North Carolina
Get access

Summary

The present work is intended as a proposition for a new research program for rigorous physical subgrid-scale (SGS) modeling on the combined basis of (i) the Germano identity (ii) and Lie symmetries, which are the axiomatic foundation of classical mechanics. First, new results are presented in this regard. The basic idea here is based on the Germano identity and the fundamental assumption in that the SGS model is just a functional of the resolved scales , that is, in the usual notation τijSGS=τijSGS(U¯), although this can of course also be generalized.

This alone defines a new functional equation of the form τik[U˜˜]−τik[U¯]˜−U¯iU¯k˜+U¯˜iU¯˜k≡0 for the SGS model, if the residual error in the Germano identity is set exactly to zero. This is in contrast to the usual dynamic procedure, where a given SGS model is introduced into the Germano identity and the residual error is minimized according to a given norm. The resulting functional equation for τijSGS(U¯) defines a new class of model equations. The solution of the aforementioned equation for the SGS model τijSGS using homogenization transform and Fourier transform shows an extremely large variety of potential solutions, that is, SGS models, which at the same time addresses the classical question of how the shape of the test filter as well as the SGS model are related to each other. The analysis quite naturally shows that the proposed analysis focuses solely on the nonlinear term of the Navier–Stokes equations. For physically realizable SGS models, the very large variety of solutions is restricted by means of the classical as well as statistical Lie symmetries of the filtered Navier–Stokes equations. The latter describes the intermittency and non-Gaussian behavior of turbulence. The symmetries can be used decidedly here, that is, it can be selected quite specifically which symmetries are to be fulfilled. A number of models are presented as examples, some of which have similarities to classical models, and also new nonlocal models emerge. As an additional new result we find that the Germano identity can be extended by a divergence-free tensor. The physical meaning of this previously overlooked term needs to be further investigated, but in the classical dynamical procedure the term does not vanish and may be employed profitably, for example, for model optimization. We conclude the presented formulation of a mathematical work program for the development of SGS models based on Lie symmetries and the Germano identity with an extensive outlook for potential further research directions.

Type
Chapter
Information
Coarse Graining Turbulence
Modeling and Data-Driven Approaches and their Applications
, pp. 151 - 176
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2025

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bardina, J., Ferziger, J. H., and Reynolds, W. C. 1980. Improved Sub-grid Scale Models for Large Eddy Simulation. AIAA-paper, 80(1357).Google Scholar
Berselli, L. C., Iliescu, T., and Layton, W. J. 2006. Mathematics of Large Eddy Simulation of Turbulent Flows. Scientific Computation. Springer.Google Scholar
Bihlo, A., and Bluman, G. 2013. Conservative parametrization schemes. Journal of Mathematical Physics, 54, 08313–1–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bytev, V. O. 1972. Group properties of the Navier–Stokes equations. Chislennye metody mehaniki sploshnoy sredy, 3, 13–17.Google Scholar
Donaldson, C. duP., and Rosenbaum, H. 1968. Calculation of the Turbulent Shear Flows through Closure of the Reynolds Equations by Invariant Modeling. Aeronautical Research Associates of Princeton.Google Scholar
Germano, M., Piomelli, U., Moin, P., and Cabot, W. H. 1991. A dynamic subgrid-scale eddy viscosity model. Phys. Fluids, 3(7), 1760–1765.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grigoriev, Y. N., Ibragimov, N. H., Kovalev, V. F., and Meleshko, S. V. 2010. Symmetries of Integro-Differential Equations. Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Khujadze, G., and Oberlack, M. 2004. DNS and scaling laws from new symmetry groups of ZPG turbulent nboundary layer flow. Theoretical and Computational Fluid Dynamics, 18, 391–411.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klingenberg, D., and Oberlack, M. 2022. Statistically invariant eddy viscosity models. Physics of Fluids, 34(5), 055114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klingenberg, D., Oberlack, M., and Pluemacher, D. 2020. Symmetries and turbulence modeling. Physics of Fluids, 32(2), 025108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kwasnicki, M. 2017. Ten Equivalent Definitions of the Fractional Laplace Operator. Fractional Calculus and Applied Analysis, 20(1), 7–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Li, C., Li, C., Humphries, T., and Plowman, H. 2019. Remarks on the generalized fractional Laplacian operator. Mathematics, 7(4), 320.Google Scholar
Lilly, D. K. 1992. A proposed modification of the Germano subgrid-scale closure method. Physics of Fluids, 4(3), 633–635.Google Scholar
Liu, S., Meneveau, C., and Katz, J. 1994. On the properties of similarity subgrid-scale models as deduced from measurements in a turbulent jet. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 275, 83–119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oberlack, M. 1997. Invariant modelling in large-eddy simulation of turbulence. Pages 3–22 in Annual Research Briefs, Moin, P. (ed). Center for Turbulence Research, Stanford University/NASA Ames, CA, USA.Google Scholar
Oberlack, M. 1999a. Similarity in non-rotating and rotating turbulent pipe flows. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 379, 1–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oberlack, M. 1999b. Similarity in non-rotating and turbulent pipe flows. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 379, 1–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oberlack, M. 2000. On symmetries and invariant solutions of laminar and turbulent wall-bounded flows. Zeitschrift für Angewandte Mathematik und Mechanik, 80(11–12), 791–800.3.0.CO;2-5>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oberlack, M. 2001. A unified approach for symmetrics in plane parallel turbulent shear flows. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 427, 299–328.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oberlack, M. 2002. On the decay exponent of isotropic turbulence. PAMM 2002, 1, 294–297.Google Scholar
Oberlack, M. 2011. On a class of SGS filters for LES with shape preserving concatenation properties. Communications in Nonlinear Science and Numerical Simulation, 16(11), 4403–4407.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oberlack, M., and Guenther, S. 2003. Shear-free turbulent diffusion: Classical and new scaling laws. Fluid Dynamics Research, 33, 453–476.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oberlack, M., and Rosteck, A. 2010. New statistical symmetries of the multi-point equations and its importance for turbulent scaling laws. Discrete and Continuous Dynamical Systems – S, 3(3), 451–471.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oberlack, M., Waclawczyk, M., Rosteck, A., and Avsarkisov, V. 2015. Symmetries and their importance for statistical turbulence theory. Bulletin of the JSME, Mechanical Engineering Reviews, 2(2), 1–72.Google Scholar
Oberlack, Martin, Hoyas, Sergio, Kraheberger, Stefanie V., Alcántara-Ávila, Francisco, and Laux, Jonathan. 2022. Turbulence Statistics of Arbitrary Moments of Wall-Bounded Shear Flows: A Symmetry Approach. Physical Review Letters, 128(Jan), 024502.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Popovich, R., and Bihlo, A. 2012. Symmetry preserving parametrization schemes. Journal of Mathematical Physics, 53, 07312–1–36.Google Scholar
Razafindralandy, D., Hamdouni, A., and Oberlack, M. 2007. Analysis and development of subgrid turbulence models preserving the symmetry properties of the Navier–Stokes equations. European Journal of Mechanics – B/Fluids, 26(4), 531–550.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schaefer-Rolffs, U. 2019. The scale invariance criterion for geophysical fluids. European Journal of Mechanics – B/Fluids, 74, 92–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schaefer-Rolffs, U., Knöpfel, R., and Becker, E. 2015. A scale invariance criterion for LES parametrizations. Meteorologische Zeitschrift, 24(1), 3–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schumann, U. 1977. Realizability of Reynolds stress turbulence models. Physics of Fluids, 20, 721–725.Google Scholar
Smagorinsky, J. 1963. General circulation experiments with the primitive equations. Monthly Weather Review, 91, 99–107.2.3.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spencer, A. J. M. 1971. Theory of invariants. Pages 239–352 in Continuum Physics, Vol. 1, Eringen, A. C. (ed). Academic Press.Google Scholar
Speziale, C. G. 1985. Galilean invariance of subgrid-scale stress models in the large-eddy simulation of turbulence. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 156, 55–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vreman, B., Geurts, B., and Kuerten, H. 1994. On the formulation of the dynamic mixed subgrid-scale model. Physics of Fluids, 6(12), 4057–4059.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Waclawczyk, M., Staffolani, N., Oberlack, M., Rosteck, A., Wilczek, M., and Friedrich, R. 2014. Statistical symmetries of the Lundgren–Monin–Novikov hierarchy. Physical Review E, 90(1), 013022.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×