Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-s22k5 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-04T15:05:22.735Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

13 - Coarse Graining for Thermal Flows

from Part II - Challenges

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 January 2025

By
Himani Garg ,
Gustav Karlsson ,
Lei Wang  and
Christer Fureby
Edited by
Fernando F. Grinstein ,
Filipe S. Pereira  and
Massimo Germano
Fernando F. Grinstein
Affiliation:
Los Alamos National Laboratory
Filipe S. Pereira
Affiliation:
Los Alamos National Laboratory
Massimo Germano
Affiliation:
Duke University, North Carolina
Get access

Summary

Numerical investigations of convective flow and heat transfer in two different engineering applications, namely cross-corrugated channels for heat exchangers and rib-roughened channels for gas turbine blade cooling, using wall-modeled large eddy simulations (LES), are presented in this chapter. Mesh resolution requirements for LES, subgrid model dependence, and heat transfer and friction factor characteristics are investigated and compared with previously published experimental data. The LES computations form a coherent suite of monotonically behaving predictions, with all aspects of the results converging toward the predictions obtained on the finest grids. Various subgrid and Reynolds-averaged Navier–Stokes equations (RANS) models are compared to account for their reliability and efficiency in the prediction of hydraulic and thermal performances in the presence of complicated flow physics. Results indicate that subgrid models such as wall-adapting local eddy viscosity model (WALE) and localized dynamic kinetic energy model (LDKM) provide the most accurate results, within 201b of Nusselt number and Darcy’s friction factor, compared to selected RANS models, which presents up to 3501b deviation from experimental data. The conclusion is that both LES and RANS have their strengths and weaknesses, and the choice between them depends on the specific application requirements and available computational resources.

Type
Chapter
Information
Coarse Graining Turbulence
Modeling and Data-Driven Approaches and their Applications
 , pp. 381 - 418
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2025

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ameen, A. 2006. Refrigeration and Air Conditioning. PHI Learning Pvt. Ltd.Google Scholar
Astarita, T., and Cardone, G. 2003. Convective heat transfer in a square channel with angled ribs on two opposite walls. Exp. Fluids, 34, 625–634.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bajpai, P. 2015. Pulp and Paper Industry: Chemicals. Elsevier.Google Scholar
Bassols, J, Kuckelkorn, B, Langreck, J, Schneider, R, and Veelken, H. 2002. Trigeneration in the food industry. Appl. Therm. Eng., 22(6), 595–602.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bénard, H. 1901. Les tourbillons cellulaires dans une nappe liquide. Méthodes optiques d’observation et d’enregistrement. J. Phys. Appl., 10(1), 254–266.Google Scholar
Bogard, D. G., and Thole, K. A. 2006. Gas turbine film cooling. J. Prop. Power, 22(2), 249–270.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bonhoff, B., Parneix, S., Leusch, J., Johnson, B. V., Schabacker, J., and Bölcs, A. 1999. Experimental and numerical study of developed flow and heat transfer in coolant channels with 45 degree ribs. Int. J. Heat Fluid Flow, 20(3), 311–319.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boussinesq, J. 1897. Théorie de l’Écoulement Tourbillonnant et Tumultueux des Liquides dans les Lits Rectilignes à Grande Section, Vol. 1. Gauthier–Villars.Google Scholar
Cabot, W, and Moin, P. 2000. Approximate wall boundary conditions in the large-eddy simulation of high Reynolds number flow. Flow, Turbulence and Combustion, 63, 269–291.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cai, Y., Wang, Y., Liu, D., and Zhao, F. Y. 2019. Thermoelectric cooling technology applied in the field of electronic devices: Updated review on the parametric investigations and model developments. Appl. Therm. Eng., 148, 238–255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chandra, P. R., Alexander, C. R., and Han, J. C. 2003. Heat transfer and friction behaviors in rectangular channels with varying number of ribbed walls. Int. J. Heat Mass Transf., 46(3), 481–495.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ciofalo, M., Stasiek, J., and Collins, M. W. 1996. Investigation of flow and heat transfer in corrugated passages – II. Numerical simulations. Int J. Heat Mass Transf., 39, 165–192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coker, A. K. 2018. Petroleum Refining Design and Applications Handbook, Volume 1. Wiley.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Corrsin, S. 1951. On the spectrum of isotropic temperature fluctuations in an isotropic turbulence. J. Appl. Phys., 22(4), 469–473.Google Scholar
Daly, B. J., and Harlow, F. H. 1970. Transport equations in turbulence. Phys. Fluids, 13(11), 2634–2649.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Darwish, M. S. 1993. A new high-resolution scheme based on the normalized variable formulation. Num. Heat Transf., part B, 24(3), 353–371.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Graça Carvalho, M. 2012. EU energy and climate change strategy. Energy, 40(1), 19–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Driest, V., and Edward, R. 1956. On turbulent flow near a wall. J. Aeronaut. Sci., 23(11), 1007–1011.Google Scholar
El Alami, M, Najam, M, Semma, E, Oubarra, A, and Penot, F. 2005. Electronic components cooling by natural convection in horizontal channel with slots. Energy Convers. Manage., 46(17), 2762–2772.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ferziger, J. H., and Perić, M. 2008. Numerical Fluid Mechanics. Springer.Google Scholar
Ferziger, J. H., Perić, M., and Street, R. L. 2002. Computational Methods for Fluid Dynamics. Springer.Google Scholar
Focke, W. W., Zachariades, J., and Oliver, I. 1985. The effect of the corrugation the thermohydraulic inclination angle on performance of plate heat exchangers. Int. J. Heat Mass Transf., 28, 1469–1479.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fureby, C., and Tabor, G. 1997. Mathematical and physical constraints on large-eddy simulations. Theor. Comput. Fluid Dyn., 9(2), 85–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ganapathy, V. 2014. Steam Generators and Waste Heat Boilers: For Process and Plant Engineers. CRC Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Germano, M., Piomelli, U., Moin, P., and Cabot, W. H. 1991. A dynamic subgrid-scale eddy viscosity model. Physics of Fluids A: Fluid Dynamics, 3(7), 1760–1765.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ghaddar, N. K., Korczak, K. Z., Mikic, B. B., and Patera, A. T. 1986. Numerical investigation of incompressible flow in grooved channels. Part 1. Stability and self-sustained oscillations. J. Fluid Mech., 163, 99–127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Godunov, S., and Bohachevsky, I. 1959. Finite difference method for numerical computation of discontinuous solutions of the equations of fluid dynamics. Matematičeskij sbornik, 47(3), 271–306.Google Scholar
Gullapalli, V. S., and Sunden, B. 2014. CFD simulation of heat transfer and pressure drop in compact brazed plate heat exchangers. Heat Transf. Eng., 35, 358–366.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Han, J. C. 1984. Heat transfer and friction in channels with two opposite rib-roughened walls. J. Heat Transf., 106(4), 774–781.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Han, J. C. 1988. Heat transfer and friction characteristics in rectangular channels with rib turbulators. J. Heat Transf., 110(2), 321–328.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Han, J. C., and Park, J. S. 1988. Developing heat transfer in rectangular channels with rib turbulators. Int. J. Heat Mass Transf., 31(1), 183–195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Han, J. C., Ou, S., Park, J. S., and Lei, C. K. 1989. Augmented heat transfer in rectangular channels of narrow aspect ratios with rib turbulators. Int. J. Heat Mass Transf., 32(9), 1619–1630.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heinzel, A., Hering, W., Konys, J., Marocco, L.and Litfin, K., Müller, G., Pacio, J., Schroer, C., Stieglitz, R., and Stoppel, L. 2017. Liquid metals as efficient high-temperature heat-transport fluids. Energy Tech., 5(7), 1026–1036.Google Scholar
Heldman, D. R, and Moraru, C. I. 2010. Encyclopedia of Agricultural, Food, and Biological Engineering. CRC Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hirsch, C. 2007. Numerical Computation of Internal and External Flows: The Fundamentals of Computational Fluid Dynamics. Elsevier.Google Scholar
Hong, Y. J., and Hsieh, S. S. 1993. Heat transfer and friction factor measurements in ducts with staggered and in-line ribs. J. Heat Transf., 115(1), 58–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Incropera, F. P., and DeWitt, D. P. 1990. Fundamentals of Heat and Mass Transfer. Wiley.Google Scholar
Issa, R. I. 1986. Solution of the implicitly discretized fluid flow equations by operator-splitting. J. Comp. Phys., 62(1), 40–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jackson, D., and Launder, B. 2007. Osborne Reynolds and the publication of his papers on turbulent flow. Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech., 39, 19–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jain, S., Joshi, A., and K., Bansal P. 2007. A new approach to numerical simulation of small sized plate heat exchangers with chevron plates. J. Heat Transf., 129, 291–297.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jeong, J., and Hussain, F. 1995. On the identification of a vortex. J. Fluid Mech., 285, 99–127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kim, W. W., and Menon, S. 1995. A new dynamic one-equation subgrid-scale model for large eddy simulations. Page 356 of: 33rd Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kim, W. W., and Menon, S. 1997. Application of the localized dynamic subgrid-scale model to turbulent wall-bounded flows. Page 210 of: 35th Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kuncoro, I. W., Pambudi, N. A., Biddinika, M. K., Widiastuti, I., Hijriawan, M., and Wibowo, K. M. 2019. Immersion cooling as the next technology for data center cooling: A review. Paper 044057 of: J. Phys.: Conf. Series, vol. 1402. IOP Publishing.Google Scholar
Laguna-Zarate, L., Barrios-Piña, H., Ramírez-León, H., García-Díaz, R., and Becerril-Piña, R. 2021. Analysis of Thermal Plume Dispersion into the Sea by Remote Sensing and Numerical Modeling. J. Mar. Sci. Eng., 9(12), 1437.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Laitinen, A., Saari, K., Kukko, K., Peltonen, P., Laurila, E., Partanen, J., and Vuorinen, V. 2020. A computational fluid dynamics study by conjugate heat transfer in OpenFOAM: A liquid cooling concept for high power electronics. Int. J. Heat Fluid Flow, 85, 108654.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Larsson, J., Kawai, S., Bodart, J., and Bermejo-Moreno, I. 2016. Large eddy simulation with modeled wall-stress: Recent progress and future directions. Mech. Eng. Rev., 3(1), 15–00418.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Launder, B. E., and Spalding, D. B. 1983. The numerical computation of turbulent flows. Pages 96–116 of: Numerical Prediction of Flow, Heat Transfer, Turbulence and Combustion. Elsevier.Google Scholar
Launder, B. E., Reece, G. Jr., and Rodi, W. 1975. Progress in the development of a Reynolds-stress turbulence closure. J. Fluid Mech., 68(3), 537–566.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lefebvre, A. H. 1983. Gas Turbine Combustion. Hemisphere Publishing Corp.Google Scholar
LeVeque, R. J. 1992. Numerical Methods for Conservation Laws. Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liang, G., and Mudawar, I. 2017. Review of spray cooling – Part 1: Single-phase and nucleate boiling regimes, and critical heat flux. Int. J. Heat Mass Transf., 115, 1174–1205.Google Scholar
Lilly, D. K. 1966. On the application of the eddy viscosity concept in the inertial sub-range of turbulence. NCAR Manuscript, 123.Google Scholar
Lilly, D. K. 1992. A proposed modification of the Germano subgrid-scale closure method. Phys. Fluids A: Fluid Dyn., 4(3), 633–635.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liou, T. M., and Hwang, J. J. 1992. Turbulent Heat Transfer Augmentation and Friction in Periodic Fully Developed Channel Flows. J. Heat Transf., 114(1), 56–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Luo, L., Yan, H., Yang, S., Du, W., Wang, S., Sunden, B., and Zhang, X. 2018. Convergence angle and dimple shape effects on the heat transfer characteristics in a rotating dimple-pin fin wedge duct. Num. Heat Transf. A Appl., 74(10), 1611–1635.Google Scholar
Menon, S. 1998. A New Approach to Validate Subgrid Models in Complex High Reynolds Number Flows. Tech. Rept. Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, School of Aerospace Engineering.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Menter, F. R., Kuntz, M., and Langtry, R. 2003. Ten years of industrial experience with the SST turbulence model. Turb. Heat Mass Transf., 4(1), 625–632.Google Scholar
Molochnikoc, V., Mazo, A., Okhotnikov, D., and Goltsman, A. 2017. Mechanism of transition to turbulence in a circular cylinder wake in a channel. MATEC Web Conf., 115, 02008.Google Scholar
Murata, A., and Mochizuki, S. 2001. Comparison between laminar and turbulent heat transfer in a stationary square duct with transverse or angled rib turbulators. Int. J. Heat Mass Transf., 44(6), 1127–1141.Google Scholar
Nelson, W. C., and Kim, C. J. 2012. Droplet actuation by electrowetting-on-dielectric (EWOD): A review. J. Adhes. Sci. Technol., 26(12–17), 1747–1771.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nicoud, F., and Ducros, F. 1999. Subgrid-scale stress modelling based on the square of the velocity gradient tensor. Flow Turbul. Combust., 62(3), 183–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oboukhov, A. M. 1949. Structure of the temperature field in turbulent flows. Isv. Geogr. Geophys. Ser., 13, 58–69.Google Scholar
Oliet, C, Oliva, A, Castro, J, and Perez-Segarra, CD. 2007. Parametric studies on automotive radiators. Appl. Therm. Eng., 27(11–12), 2033–2043.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Olsson, C. O., and Sunden, B. 1998. Experimental study of flow and heat transfer in rib-roughened rectangular channels. Exp. Thermal Fluid Sci., 16(4), 349–365.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Park, J. S, Han, J. C, Huang, Y., Ou, S., and Boyle, R. J. 1992. Heat transfer performance comparisons of five different rectangular channels with parallel angled ribs. Int. J. Heat Mass Transf., 35(11), 2891–2903.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Piomelli, U., Ferziger, J., Moin, P., and Kim, J. 1989. New approximate boundary conditions for large eddy simulations of wall-bounded flows. Phys. Fluids A, 1(6), 1061–1068.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Piomelli, U. 2008. Wall-layer models for large-eddy simulations. Progress in Aerospace Sciences, 44(6), 437–446.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pope, S. B. 2004. Ten questions concerning the large-eddy simulation of turbulent flows. New J. Phys., 6(1), 35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pope, S. B. 2000. Turbulent Flows. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Rau, G., C¸akan, M., Moeller, D., and Arts, T. 1998. The effect of periodic ribs on the local aerodynamic and heat transfer performance of a straight cooling channel. J. Turbomachinery, 120(2), 368–375.Google Scholar
Rayleigh, Lord 1916. On convection currents in a horizontal layer of fluid, when the higher temperature is on the under side. The Lond. Edinb. Dubl. Phil. Mag. & J. Sci., 32(192), 529–546.Google Scholar
Revankar, S. T. 2019. Nuclear hydrogen production. Pages 49–117 in: Storage and Hybridization of Nuclear Energy. Elsevier.Google Scholar
Ring, T. A. 1996. Fundamentals of Ceramic Powder Processing and Synthesis. Elsevier.Google Scholar
Roelofs, F., Gopala, V. R., Van Tichelen, K., Cheng, X., Merzari, E., and Pointer, W. D. 2013. Status and future challenges of CFD for liquid metal cooled reactors. Presentation International Conference on Fast Reactors and Related Fuel Cycles: Safe Technologies and Sustainable Scenario.Google Scholar
Sabato, M., Fregni, A., Stalio, E., Brusiani, F., Tranchero, M., and Baritaud, T. 2019. Numerical study of submerged impinging jets for power electronics cooling. Int. J. Heat Mass Transf., 141, 707–718.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sagaut, P. 2006. Large Eddy Simulation for Incompressible Flows: An Introduction. Springer.Google Scholar
Šalić, A., Tušek, A., and Zelić, B. 2012. Application of microreactors in medicine and biomedicine. J. Appl. Biomed., 10(3), 137–153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schumann, U. 1975. Subgrid scale model for finite difference simulations of turbulent flows in plane channels and annuli. J. Comput. Phys., 18(4), 376–404.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Settle, M. 1978. Volcanic eruption clouds and the thermal power output of explosive eruptions. J. Volcanol. Geoth. Res., 3(3–4), 309–324.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sharma, A., Tyagi, V. V., Chen, C. R., and Buddhi, D. 2009. Review on thermal energy storage with phase change materials and applications. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev., 13(2), 318–345.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shaw, R. K., and Sekulic, D. P. 2003. Fundamentals of Heat Exchanger Design. Wiley.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shih, T. H., Liou, W. W., Shabbir, A., Yang, Z., and Zhu, J. 1995. A new k-ϵ eddy viscosity model for high reynolds number turbulent flows. Comp. Fluids, 24(3), 227–238.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smagorinsky, J. 1963. General circulation experiments with the primitive equations: I. The basic experiment. Mon. Weather Rev., 91(3), 99–164.2.3.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spalding, D. B. 1961. A single formula for the law of the wall. J. Appl. Mech., 28(3), 455–458.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Speziale, C. G. 1985. Galilean invariance of subgrid-scale stress models in the large-eddy simulation of turbulence. J. Fluid Mech., 156, 55–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sundén, B. 2005. High Temperature Heat Exchanger. Pages 226–238 in: 5th Int. Conference on Enhanced, Compact and Ultra-Compact Heat Exchangers: Science, Engineering and Technology, Shah, R. K., Ishizuka, M., Rudy, T. M., and Wadekar, V. V. (eds). Engineering Conferences International.Google Scholar
Sundén, B., and Wang, L. 2003. Relevance of heat transfer and heat exchangers for greenhouse gas emissions. Pages 101–112 in: Advances in Heat Transfer Engineering, Sundén, B. and Vilemas, J. (eds). Begell House.Google Scholar
Sunden, B., Meyer, J., Dirker, J., John, B., and Mukkamala, Y. 2021. Local measurements in heat exchangers: A systematic review and regression analysis. Heat Transfer Engineering, 43, 1529–1565.Google Scholar
Sweby, P. K. 1984. High resolution schemes using flux limiters for hyperbolic conservation laws. SIAM J. Numer. Anal., 21(5), 995–1011.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tang, H., Tang, Y., Wan, Z., Li, J., Yuan, W., Lu, L., Li, Y., and Tang, K. 2018. Review of applications and developments of ultra-thin micro heat pipes for electronic cooling. Appl. Energy, 223, 383–400.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taslim, M. E., and Wadsworth, C. M. 1997. An experimental investigation of the rib surface-averaged heat transfer coefficient in a rib-roughened square passage. J. Turbomachinery, 119(2), 381–389.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taslim, M. E., Li, T., and Kercher, D. M. 1996. Experimental heat transfer and friction in channels roughened with angled, V-shaped, and discrete ribs on two opposite walls. J. Turbomachinery, 118(CONF-940626-).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tessicini, F., Li, N., and Leschziner, M. A. 2006. Simulation of three-dimensional separation with a zonal near-wall approximation. In: Proc. ECCOMAS CFD, vol. 2006.Google Scholar
Tsai, Y. C., Liu, F. B., and Shen, P. T. 2009. Investigations of the pressure drop and flow distribution in a chevron-type plate heat exchanger. Int. Commun. Heat Mass Transf., 36, 574–578.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tuckerman, D. B., and Pease, R. F. W. 1981. High-performance heat sinking for VLSI. IEEE Electron Device Lett., 2(5), 126–129.Google Scholar
Vreman, B., Geurts, B., and Kuerten, H. 1994. Realizability conditions for the turbulent stress tensor in large-eddy simulation. J. Fluid Mech., 278, 351–362.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wang, J., Hu, Z., Du, C., Tian, L., and Baleta, J. 2021. Numerical study of effusion cooling of a gas turbine combustor liner. Fuel, 294, 120578.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wang, L., and Sundén, B. 2005. Experimental investigation of local heat transfer in a square duct with continuous and truncated ribs. Exp. Heat Transf., 18(3), 179–197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wang, L., Salewski, M., and Sundén, B. 2010. Turbulent flow in a ribbed channel: Flow structures in the vicinity of a rib. 34(2), 165–176.Google Scholar
Wang, Meng, and Moin, Parviz. 2002. Dynamic wall modeling for large-eddy simulation of complex turbulent flows. Physics of Fluids, 14(7), 2043–2051.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Webb, R. L., and Kim, N. H. 2005. Principles of Enhanced Heat Transfer. Taylor & Francis.Google Scholar
Weibel, J. A., and Garimella, S. V. 2013. Recent advances in vapor chamber transport characterization for high-heat-flux applications. Adv. Heat Transf., 45, 209–301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
White, F. M. 2008. Fluid Mechanics. McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Wilcox, D. C. 1998. Turbulence Nodeling for CFD, Vol 2. DCW industries La Canada, CA.Google Scholar
Wilcox, D. C. 2008. Formulation of the kw turbulence model revisited. AIAA Journal, 46(11), 2823–2838.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Won, S. Y., Mahmood, G. I., and Ligrani, P. M. 2003. Flow structure and local Nusselt number variations in a channel with angled crossed-rib turbulators. Int. J. Heat Mass Transf., 46(17), 3153–3166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhang, L., and Che, D. 2011. Turbulence Models for Fluid Flow and Heat Transfer Between Cross-Corrugated Plates. Numer. Heat Transf. A: Appl., 60, 410–440.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhu, X., and Haglind, F. 2020. Relationship between inclination angle and friction factor of chevron-type plate heat exchangers. Int. J. Heat Mass Transf., 162, 120370.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zohuri, B. 2015. Application of Compact Heat Exchangers for Combined Cycle Driven Efficiency in Next Generation Nuclear Power Plants: A Novel Approach. Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×