Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-6bf8c574d5-xtvcr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-23T18:46:54.595Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

23 - Multimedia Learning of Reading

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 June 2012

By
David Reinking
Edited by
Richard Mayer
David Reinking
Affiliation:
Clemson University
Richard Mayer
Affiliation:
University of California, Santa Barbara
Get access

Summary

Abstract

Addressing how multimedia learning intersects with teaching reading and learning to read entails unique challenges when compared to other school subjects. Those challenges spring from the prominent place that reading instruction occupies in the school curriculum and in daily life. As the first of the three Rs, learning to read is foundational to all school subjects. Further, the ability to read and comprehend textual information is integral to all schooling and indeed to living a productive and fulfilling life in developed areas of the world (Brandt, 2001).

Introduction

In part because the stakes are high and in part because reading is an intriguingly complex cognitive activity, the teaching and learning of reading have historically attracted attention from diverse disciplines. The literature pertaining to reading is an interdisciplinary amalgam including not only mainstream scholars of reading pedagogy, but also educational researchers in other curricular areas, psychologists of every stripe, sociologists, historians, philosophers, and even those in the medical field such as ophthalmologists. The appearance of multimedia forms of communication made possible by computer technology has reinforced and extended the interdisciplinary mix to include scholars in fields such as journalism and mass media, library science, instructional design, and computer science.

Further, because a citizenry's collective reading achievement is perceived to have important economic and political consequences, reading pedagogy and the scholarly work that informs it are almost daily in the public eye.

Type
Chapter
Information
The Cambridge Handbook of Multimedia Learning , pp. 355 - 374
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2005

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Atkinson, R., & Hansen, D. (1966–67). Computer-assisted instruction in initial reading: The Stanford project. Reading Research Quarterly, 2, 5–26CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barron, R., Lovett, M., & McCabe, R. (1998). Using talking computers to remediate reading and spelling disabilities: The critical role of the print-to-sound unit. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments and Computers, 30(4), 610–616CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beck, I. L., & McKeown, M. G. (2001). Text Talk: Capturing the benefits of read-aloud experiences for young children. The Reading Teacher, 55, 10–20Google Scholar
Birkerts, S. (1994). The Gutenberg elegies: The fate of reading in an electronic age. Boston: Faber and FaberGoogle Scholar
Blok, H., Oostdam, R., Otter, M. E., & Overmaat, M. (2002). Computer-assisted instruction in support of beginning reading instruction: A Review. Review of Educational Research, 72, 101–130CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bolter, J. D. (1991). Writing space: The computer, hypertext, and the history of writing. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum AssociatesGoogle Scholar
Bolter, J. D. (2001). Writing space: Computers, hypertext, and the remediation of print. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum AssociatesGoogle Scholar
Bolter, J. D., & Grusin, R. (2000). Remediation: Understanding new media. Cambridge, MA: MIT PressGoogle Scholar
Brandt, D. (2001). Literacy in American lives. New York: Cambridge University PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bruce, B. C., & Rubin, A. (1993). Electronic quills: A situated evaluation of using computers for writing in classrooms. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum AssociatesGoogle Scholar
Carpenter, P. A., Just, M. A., & Fallside, D. C. (1988). The role of animation in understanding descriptions of kinematics. Pittsburgh, PA: Carnegie Mellon UniversityGoogle Scholar
Chera, P., & Wood, C. (2003). Animated multimedia “talking books” can promote phonological awareness in children beginning to read. Learning and Instruction, 13(1), 33–52CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cognition and Technology Group at Vanderbilt University. (1994). Multimedia environments for developing literacy in at-risk students. In Means, B. (Ed.), Technology and education reform: The reality behind the promise (pp. 23–56). San Francisco: Jossey-BassGoogle Scholar
Cordova, D. I., & Lepper, M. R. (1996). Intrinsic motivation and the process of learning: Beneficial effects of contextualization, personalization, and choice. Journal of Educational Psychology, 88, 715–730CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dale, E. 1946. Audiovisual methods in teaching. New York: Holt, Rinehart, and WinstonGoogle Scholar
DeJong, M. T., & Bus, A. G. (2002). Quality of book-reading matters for emergent readers: An experiment with the same book in a regular or electronic format. Journal of Educational Psychology, 94, 145–208CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DeJong, M. T., & Bus, A. G. (2003). How well suited are electronic books to supporting literacy? Journal of Early Childhood Literacy, 3, 147–164CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DeJong, M. T., & Bus, A. G. (2004). The efficacy of electronic books in fostering kindergarten children's emergent story understanding. Reading Research Quarterly 39, 378–393Google Scholar
Durkin, D. (1978–79). What classroom observations reveal about reading comprehension instruction. Reading Research Quarterly, 15, 483–533Google Scholar
Ehri, L. C. (1992). Reconceptualizing the development of sight word reading and its relationship to decoding. In Gouight, P. B., Ehri, L. C., & Trieman, R. (Eds.), Reading acquisition (pp. 107–143). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum AssociatesGoogle Scholar
Ertmer, P. A., Addison, P., Lane, M., Ross, E., & Woods, D. (1999). Examining teachers' beliefs about the role of technology in the elementary classroom. Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 32, 54–72CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Flood, J., Heath, S. B., & Lapp, D. (Eds.). (1997). Handbook of research on teaching literacy through the communicative and visual arts. New York: McMillanGoogle Scholar
Goodman, K. (1976). Reading: A psycholinguistic guessing game. In Singer, H., & Ruddell, R. (Eds.), Theoretical models and processes of reading (pp. 497–508). Newark, DE: International Reading AssociationGoogle Scholar
Gough, P. B. (1984). Word recognition. In Pearson, P. D. (Ed.), Handbook of reading research, (Vol. 1, pp. 225–253). New York: LongmanGoogle Scholar
Hegarty, M., Carpenter, P. A., & Just, M. A. (1991). Diagrams in comprehension of scientific texts. In Barr, R., Kamil, M. L., Mosenthal, P., & Pearson, P. D. (Eds.), Handbook of reading research (Vol. 2, pp. 641–648). New York: LongmanGoogle Scholar
Ho, C., & Ma, R. (1999). Training phonological strategies improves Chinese dyslexic children's character reading skills. Journal of Research in Reading, 22(2), 131–142CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hynd, C. R., Jacobson, M., & Reinking, D. (1999, April). Students' understanding of history using multiple texts: Development of disciplinary knowledge in a hypertext environment. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
International Reading Association (2001). Integrating literacy and technology into the curriculum: A position statement of the International Reading Association. Retrieved August 2, 2004 from http://www.reading.org/focus/techn.html
International Society for Technology in Education (2002). The National Educational Technology Standards (NETS) Project. Retrieved August 2, 2004 from http://cnets.este.org
James, R. (1999). Navigating CD-ROMs: An exploration of children reading interactive narratives. Children's Literature in Education, 30, 47–63CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jonassen, D. H., & Reeves, T. C. (1996). Learning with technology: Using computers as cognitive tools. In Jonassen, D. H. (Ed.), Handbook of research for educational communication and technology (pp. 693–719). New York: McmillanGoogle Scholar
Kamil, M. L., Kim, H., & Intrator, S. (2000). Effects of other technologies on literacy and literacy learning. In Kamil, M. L., Mosenthal, P. B., Pearson, P. D., Barr, R. (Eds.), Handbook of reading research. Vol. 3, pp. 773–791. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum AssociatesGoogle Scholar
Kamil, M. L., & Lane, D. M. (1998). Researching the relation between technology and literacy: An agenda for the 21st century. In Reinking, D., McKenna, M. C., Labbo, L. D., & Kieffer, R. D. (Eds.), Handbook of literacy and technology: Transformations in a post-typographic world (pp. 323–342). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum AssociatesGoogle Scholar
Karchmer, R. A. (2001). The journey ahead: Thirteen teachers report how the Internet influences literacy and literacy instruction in their K–12 classrooms. Reading Research Quarterly, 36, 442–466CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kayany, J. M., & Yelsma, P. (2000). Displacement effects of online media in the socio-technical contexts of households. Journal of Broadcasting Media, 44, 215–229CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kinzer, C. K., & Risko, V. J. (1988). Macrocontexts to facilitate learning. Paper presented at the 33rd Annual Conference of the International Reading Association, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Kress, G. (1996). Reading images: The grammar of visual design. London: RoutledgeGoogle Scholar
Labbo, L. D. (1996). A semiotic analysis of young children's symbol making in a classroom computer center. Reading Research Quarterly, 31, 356–385CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Labbo, L. D., & Kuhn, M. R. (2000). Weaving chains of affect and cognition: A young child's understanding of CD-ROM talking books. Journal of Literacy Research, 32, 187–210CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Labbo, L. D., & Reinking, D. (1999). Negotiating the multiple realities of technology in literacy research and instruction. Reading Research Quarterly, 34, 478–492CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Labbo, L. & Reinking, D. (2003). Computers and early literacy education. In Hall, N., Larson, J., & Marsh, J. (Eds.), Handbook of early childhood literacy (pp. 338–354). London, UK: SageGoogle Scholar
Lanham, R. A. (1993). The electronic word: Democracy, technology, and the arts. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lawless, K. A., Mills, R., & Brown, S. W. (2003). Children's hypertext navigation strategies. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 34, 274–284CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lemke, J. L. (1998). Metamedia literacy: Transforming meanings and media. In Reinking, D., McKenna, M. C., Labbo, L. D., & Kieffer, R. D. (Eds.), Handbook of literacy and technology: Transformations in a post-typographic world (pp. 283–302). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum AssociatesGoogle Scholar
Leu, D. J. (2000). Literacy and technology: Deictic consequences for literacy education in an information age. In Kamil, M. L., Mosenthal, P. B., Pearson, P. D., & Barr, R. (Eds.), Handbook of reading research: Volume III (pp. 743–770). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum AssociatesGoogle Scholar
Leu, D. J., & Kinzer, C. K. (2000). The convergence of literacy instruction with networked technologies for information, communication, and education. Reading Research Quarterly, 35, 108–127CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leu, D. J., Kinzer, C. K., Coiro, J. L., & Commack, D. W. (2004). Toward a theory of new literacies emerging from the Internet and other information and communication technologies. In Ruddell, R. B. & Unrau, N. J. (Eds.), Theoretical models and processes of reading (5th ed.) (pp. 1570–1613). Newark, DE: International Reading AssociationGoogle Scholar
Leu, D. J., & Reinking, D. (1996). Bringing insights from reading research to research on electronic learning environments. In Oostendorp, H. (Ed.), Cognitive aspects of electronic text processing (pp. 43–75). Norwood, NJ: AblexGoogle Scholar
Lundberg, I. (1995). The computer as a tool of remediation in the education of students with reading disabilities: A theory-based approach. Learning Disability Quarterly, 18(2), 89–99CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mayer, R. E. (2001). Multimedia learning. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar
McConkie, G. W., & Zola, D. (1987). Two examples of computer-based research on reading: Eye movement monitoring and computer-aided reading. In Reinking, D. (Ed.), Reading and computers: Issues for theory and practice (97–108). New York: Teachers College PressGoogle Scholar
McGee, P. (2000). Persistence and motivation: A new teacher's path to technology infusion. Computers in the Schools, 16, 197–211CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McKenna, M. C.Kear, J. J., & Ellsworth, R. A. (1995). Children's attitudes toward reading: A national survey. Reading Research Quarterly, 30, 934–957CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McKenna, M. C., Reinking, D., & Bradley, B. A. (2003). The effects of electronic trade books on the decoding growth of beginning readers. In Joshi, R. M., Leong, C. K., & Kaczmarek, B. L. J. (Eds.), Literacy acquisition: The role of phonology, morphology, and orthography (pp. 193–202). Amsterdam: IOS PressGoogle Scholar
Miller, G. A., & Gildea, P. M. (1987). How children learn words. Scientific American, 257(3), 94–99CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Miller, L., & Olson, J. (1998). Literacy research oriented toward features of technology and classrooms. In Reinking, D., McKenna, M. C., Labbo, L. D., & Kieffer, R. D. (Eds.), Handbook of literacy and technology: Transformations in a post-typographic world (pp. 343–360). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum AssociatesGoogle Scholar
Myers, J., & Beach, R. (2001). Hypermedia authoring as critical literacy. Journal of Adolescent and Adult Literacy, 44, 538–545Google Scholar
Myers, J., Hammett, R., & McKillop, A. M. (1998). Opportunities for critical literacy and pedagogy in student-authored hypermedia. In Reinking, D., McKenna, M. C., Labbo, L. D., & Kieffer, R. D. (Eds.), Handbook of literacy and technology: Transformations in a post-typographic world (pp. 63–78). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum AssociatesGoogle Scholar
National Reading Panel (2000). Teaching Children to Read: Summary Report. Retrieved January 7, 2004, from http://www.nationalreadingpanel.org/
Niederhauser, D. S., Reynolds, R. E., Salmen, D. J., & Skolmoski, P. (2000). The influence of cognitive load on learning from hypertext. Journal of Eduational Computing Research, 23, 237–255CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Olson, K. & Johnston, J. (1989). The use of the computer as a writing tool in a kindergarten and first grade classroom (CIEL Pilot Year Final Report, Part 2). Ann Arbor, MI: Ann Arbor School of EducationGoogle Scholar
Olson, R. K., Foltz, G., & Wise, B. W. (1986a). Reading instruction and remediation using voice synthesis in computer interaction. Proceeding of the Human Factors Society, 2, 1336–1339CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Olson, R. K., Foltz, G., & Wise, B. W. (1986b). Reading instruction and remediation with the aid of computer speech. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, and Computer, 18, 93–99CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Olson, R. K., & Wise, B. W. (1992). Reading on the computer with orthographic and speech feedback: An overview of the Colorado Remedial Reading Project. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 4, 107–144CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Olson, R. K., & Wise, B. W. (2004, January). Computer-based remediation for reading and related phonological disabilities in 2nd to 5th grade children, and the importance of appropriate controls in research. Paper presented at the International Workshop on Computer-Based Reading Instructional Programs, Paris, France
Olson, R. K., Wise, B., Ring, J., & Johnson, M. (1997). Computer-based remedial training in phoneme awareness and phonological decoding: Effects on the post training development of word recognition. Scientific Studies in Reading, 1, 235–253CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Paris, S. (in press). Re-interpreting the development of reading skills. Reading Research QuarterlyGoogle Scholar
Pressley, M. (2000). What should comprehension instruction be the instruction of? In Kamil, M. L., Mosenthal, P. B., Pearson, P. D., & Barr, R. (Eds.), Handbook of reading research: Volume III (pp. 545–561). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum AssociatesGoogle Scholar
Reinking, D. (1992). Differences between electronic and printed texts: An agenda for research. Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia 1(1), 11–24Google Scholar
Reinking, D. (1995). Reading and writing with computers: Literacy research in a post-typographic world. In Hinchman, K. A., Leu, D. J., & Kinzer, C. K. (Eds.), Perspectives in literacy research and practice (pp. 17–34). Forty-fourth Yearbook of the National Reading Conference. Chicago, IL: National Reading ConferenceGoogle Scholar
Reinking, D. (1997). Me and my hypertext: A multiple digression analysis of technology and literacy (sic). The Reading Teacher, 50, 626–643Google Scholar
Reinking, D. (1998). Synthesizing technological transformations of literacy in a post typographic world. In Reinking, D., McKenna, M., Labbo, L. D., & Kieffer, R. (Eds.), Handbook of literacy and technology (pp. ⅺ–ⅹⅹⅹ). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum AssociatesGoogle Scholar
Reinking, D. (2001). Multimedia and engaged reading in a digital world. In Verhoeven, L. & Snow, C. (Eds.), Literacy and motivation: Reading engagement in individuals and groups (pp. 195–221). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum AssociatesGoogle Scholar
Reinking, D., & Bridwell-Bowles, L. (1991). Computers in reading and writing research. In Barr, R., Kamil, M. L., Mosenthal, P., & Pearson, P. D. (Eds.), Handbook of reading research: Vol. 2 (pp. 310–340). New York: LongmanGoogle Scholar
Reinking, D., & Chanlin, L. J. (1994). Graphic aids in electronic texts. Reading Research and Instruction, 33, 207–232CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reinking, D., Labbo, L. D., & McKenna, M. (1997). Navigating the changing landscape of literacy: Current theory and research in computer-based reading and writing. In Flood, J., Heath, S. B., and Lapp, D. (Eds.), Handbook of research on teaching literacy through the communicative and visual arts (pp. 77–92). New York: MacmillanGoogle Scholar
Reinking, D., Labbo, L. D., & McKenna, M. C. (2000). From assimilation to accommodation: A developmental framework for integrating digital technologies into literacy research and instruction. Journal of Research in Reading 23 (2), 110–122CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reinking, D., Pickle, M., & Tao, L. (1996). The effects of inserted questions and mandatory review in computer-mediated texts (Reading Research Report #50). Athens, GA: National Reading Research CenterGoogle Scholar
Reinking, D., & Rickman, S. S. (1990). The effects of computer-mediated texts on the vocabularly learning and comprehensions of intermediate-grade readers. Journal of Reading Behavior, 22, 395–411CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reinking, D., & Watkins, J. (2000). A formative experiment investigating the use of multimedia book reviews to increase elementary students' independent reading. Reading Research Quarterly, 35, 384–489CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reistma, P. (1988). Reading practice for beginners: Effects of guided reading, reading while-listening, and independent reading with computer-based speech feedback. Reading Research Quarterly, 23, 219–235Google Scholar
Reitsma, P., & Wesseling, R. (1998). Effects of computer-asisted training of blending skills in kindergarten. Scientific Studies of Reading, 2(4), 301–320CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ricci, C. M., & Beal, C. R. (2002). The effect of interactive media on children's story memory. Journal of Educational Psychology, 94, 138–144CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Risko, V. J., Kinzer, C. K., Goodman, J., McLarity, K., Dupree, A., & Martin, H. (1989). Effects of macrocontexts on reading comprehension, composition of stories, and vocabulary development. Paper presented at the meeting of the American Education Research Association, San Francisco, CA
Rouet, J. F., Levonen, J. J., Dillon, A., & Spiro, R. J. (1996). Hypertext and cognition. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum AssociatesGoogle Scholar
Sadoski, M., & Paivio, A. (2001). Imagery and text: A dual coding theory of reading and writing. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum AssociatesGoogle Scholar
Salomon, G. (1979). Interaction of media, cognition, and learning. San Francisco: Jossey-BassGoogle Scholar
Salomon, G., Globerson, T., & Guterman, E. (1989). The computer as a zone of proximal development: Internalizing reading-related metacognitions from a reading partner. Journal of Educational Psychology, 81, 620–627CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Salomon, G., Perkins, D. N., & Globerson, T. (1991). Partners in cognition: Extending human intelligence with intelligent technologies. Educational Researcher, 20(3), 2–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Segers, E., & Verhoeven, L. (2004). Computer-supported phonological awareness intervention for kindergarten children with specific language impairment. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 35, 229–239CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shapiro, A. M. (1998). Promoting active learning: The role of system structure in learning from hypertext. Human-Computer Interaction, 13, 1–35CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shapiro, A., & Niederhauser, D. (2004). Learning from hypertext: Research issues and findings. In Jonassen, D. (Ed.), Handook of research for educational communications and technology (pp. 605–620). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum AssociatesGoogle Scholar
Sharp, D. L. M., Bransford, J. D., Vye, N. J., Goldman, S. R., Kinzer, C., & Soraci, Jr., S. (1992). Literacy in an age of integrated media. In Dreher, M. J. & Slater, W. H. (Eds). Elementary school literacy: Critical issues (pp. 183–210). Norwood, MA: Christopher GordonGoogle Scholar
Spiro, R., Feltovitch, P., Jacobson, M., & Coulson, R. (1992). Cognitive flexibility, constructivism, and hypertext: Random access for advanced knowledge acquisition in ill-structured domains. In Duffy, T. & Jonassen, D. (Eds.), Constructivism and the technology of instruction (pp. 57–75). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum AssociatesGoogle Scholar
Stahl, S. A., Hynd, C. R., Britton, B. K., McNish, M. M., & Bosquet, D. (1996). What happens when students read multiple source documents in history? Reading Research Quarterly, 31, 430–436CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stanovich, K. E. (1986). Matthew effects in reading: Some consequences of individual differences in the acquisition of literacy. Reading Research Quarterly, 21, 360–407CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tobias, S. (1987). Mandatory text review and interaction with stuent characteristics. Journal of Educational Psychology, 79, 154–161CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tobias, S. (1988). Teaching strategic text review by computer and interaction with student characteristics. Computers in Human Behavior, 4, 299–310CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wagner, D., & Kozma, R. (2003). New technologies for literacy and adult education: A global perspective. Retrieved August 2, 2004, from http://www.literacyonline.org/ICTconf/
Walker, S., & Reynolds, L. (2000). Screen design for children's reading: Some key issues. Journal of Research in Reading, 23, 224–234CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Windschitl, M, & Sahl, K. (2002). Tracing teachers' use of technology in a laptop computer school: The interplay of teacher beliefs, social dynamics and institutional culture. American Educational Research Journal, 39, 165–205CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wineburg, S. S. (1991). Historical problem solving: A study of the cognitive processes used in the evaluation of documentary and pictorial evidence. Journal of Educational Psychology, 83, 73–77CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wise, B., & Olson, R. (1995). Computer-based phonological awareness and reading instruction. Annals of Dyslexia, 45, 99–122CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wise, B., Olson, R., Anstett, M., Andrews, L., Terjak, M., Schnider, V., & Kostuch, J. (1989). Implementing a long-term computerized remedial reading program with synthetic speech feedback: Hardware, software, and real-world issues. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, and Computers, 21, 173–180CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wise, B. W., Ring, J., & Olson, R. K. (1999). Training phonological awareness with and without attention to articulation. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 72, 271–304CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wise, B. W., Ring, J., & Olson, R. K. (2000). Individual differences in gains from computer-assisted remedial reading with more emphasis on phonological analysis or accurate reading in context. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 77, 197–235CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zammit, K., & Callow, J. (2000). Ideology and technology: A visual and textual analysis of two popular CD-ROM programs. Linguistics in Education, 10, 89–105CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhao, Y., Pugh, K., Sheldon, S., & Byers, J. L. (2002). Conditions for classroom technology innovations. Teachers College Record, 104, 482–515CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×