Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-686fd747b7-hzbls Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-13T13:12:04.880Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

8 - Heritage Languages in Canada

from Part I - Heritage Languages around the World

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 November 2021

By
Naomi Nagy
Edited by
Silvina Montrul  and
Maria Polinsky
Silvina Montrul
Affiliation:
University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign
Maria Polinsky
Affiliation:
University of Maryland, College Park
Get access

Summary

This chapter reports on the status of heritage languages (HLs) in Canada in usage, in research, and in education. It begins with an overview of HLs in Canada and the current ethnolinguistic vitality (demographics, institutional support, and status) of these language varieties. This includes an overview of programs to teach HLs (or to use HLs as the medium of instruction) in primary, secondary, and post-secondary contexts. Census information is provided to profile the distribution of HL speakers across major cities and all the provinces and territories of Canada, and the status of the HLs. The next section surveys publications about HLs in Canada including overviews, studies from the domain of sociolinguistics (language variation and change) that rely on spontaneous speech corpora, acquisition studies employing experimental methodology, and research on pedagogical approaches, noting primary findings from each. Specific information is provided about heritage varieties of Cantonese, German, Greek, Italian, Inuktitut, Korean, Mandarin, Russian, Spanish, Tagalog, and Ukrainian.

Keywords

CanadaHeritage languageLanguage contactEthnolinguistic vitalityLanguage teachingvariationist sociolinguisticsAcquisitionLinguisticsPedagogy
Type
Chapter
Information
The Cambridge Handbook of Heritage Languages and Linguistics , pp. 178 - 204
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2021

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Anastassiadis, A., Ralli, R., Gekas, A., Pappas, P., Papangiotou, C., Siotou, A., Tsimbouris, C., and Tsolakidis, S.. 2017. Immigration and language in Canada: Greeks and Greek Canadians. [Electronic Database]. https://immigrec.com/enGoogle Scholar
Arnbjörnsdóttir, Birna. 2006. North American Icelandic: The Life of a Language. Winnipeg: University of Manitoba Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Babaee, N. 2012. Heritage language learning in Canadian public Schools: Language rights challenges. Manitoba: http://umanitoba.ca/faculties/education/media/Babaee12.pdfGoogle Scholar
Benmamoun, E., Montrul, S., and Polinsky, M.. 2013. Heritage Languages and Their Speakers: Opportunities and Challenges for Linguistics. Theoretical Linguistics 39(3–4), 129–181.Google Scholar
Berry, J. 1998. Official Multiculturalism. In Edwards, J. (ed.), Language in Canada. New York: Cambridge, 84–101.Google Scholar
Brousseau, L. and Dewing, M.. 2009. Canadian Multiculturalism. Library of Parliament. Publication No. 2009-20-E.Google Scholar
Burnaby, B. 2008. Language Policy and Education in Canada. In May, S. and Hornberger, N. H. (eds.), Encyclopedia of Language and Education (2nd ed.): Vol. 1. Language Policy and Political Issues in Education. New York: Springer, 331–341.Google Scholar
Canadian Education Association. 1991. Heritage Language Programs in Canadian School Boards. Toronto.Google Scholar
Canadian Press. 2019. Liberals Taking New Approach for First Nations On-Reserve Education Funding. CBC News, January 21, 2019. www.cbc.ca/news/indigenous/first-nations-on-reserve-school-funding-1.4987134Google Scholar
Carrier, J. 2017. The Ergative-Antipassive Alternation in Inuktitut: Analyzed in a Case of New-Dialect Formation. Canadian Journal of Linguistics/Revue canadienne de linguistique 62(4), 661–684.Google Scholar
Casini, S. 2018. Italianismi e pseudoitalianismi a Toronto: tra valori simbolici e prospettive di apprendimento [Italianisms and Pseudoitalianisms in Toronto: Between Symbolic Value and Acquisition Perspectives]. In Turchetta, B. and Vedovelli, M. (eds.), Lo spazio linguistico italiano globale: il caso dell’Ontario [The Global Italian Linguistic Space: The Case of Ontario]. Pisa: Pacini, 225–253.Google Scholar
Chumak-Horbatsch, R. 1987. Language Use in the Ukrainian Home: A Toronto Sample. International Journal of the Sociology of Language 63, 99–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Comanaru, R. and Noels, K.. 2009. Self-Determination, Motivation, and the Learning of Chinese as a Heritage Language. Canadian Modern Language Review 66(1), 131–158.Google Scholar
Cumming, A. 2014. Programs for Education in Immigrant, Heritage, or International Languages in Canada. Toronto: CERLL (Centre for Educational Research on Languages and Literacies), OISE, University of Toronto. www.oise.utoronto.ca/cerll1/wp-content/uploads/sites/49/2018/02/AGoogle Scholar
Cummins, J. 1983. Heritage Language Education: A Literature Review. Toronto: Ministry of Education.Google Scholar
Cummins, J. (ed.) 1991. Heritage Languages [Special Issue]. The Canadian Modern Language Review 47(4).Google Scholar
Cummins, J. 1998a. Language Issues and Educational Change. In Hargreaves, A., Lieberman, A., Fullan, M., and Hopkins, D. (eds.), International Handbook of Educational Change. Dordrecht, Boston, London: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 440–459.Google Scholar
Cummins, J. 1998b. The Teaching of International Languages. In Edwards, J. (ed.), Language in Canada. New York: Cambridge, 293–304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cummins, J. 2005. A Proposal for Action: Strategies for Recognizing Heritage Language Competence as a Learning Resource within the Mainstream Classroom. The Modern Language Journal 89(4), 585–592.Google Scholar
Cummins, J. 2014. To What Extent Are Canadian Second Language Policies Evidence-Based? Reflections on the Intersections of Research and Policy. Frontiers in Psychology: Language Sciences 5 (article 358), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00358Google Scholar
Cummins, J. and Danesi, M.. 1990. Heritage Languages: The Development and Denial of Canada’s Linguistic Resources. Toronto: James Lorimer.Google Scholar
Danesi, M., McLeod, K., and Morris, S.. 1993. Heritage Languages and Education: The Canadian Experience. Oakville, ON: Mosaic. www.mosaic-press.com/product/heritage-languages-and-education-the-canadian-experience/Google Scholar
Daskalaki, E., Chondrogianni, V., Blom, E., Argyri, F., and Paradis, J.. 2019. Input Effects across Domains: The Case of Greek Subjects in Child Heritage Language. Second Language Research 35(3), 421–445.Google Scholar
Department of Education Newfoundland and Labrador. 2011. www.ed.gov.nl.ca/edu/Google Scholar
Department of Spanish and Portuguese. 2019. Undergraduate Programs in Spanish: Language sequence. www.spanport.utoronto.ca/undergraduate/spanishGoogle Scholar
Di Salvo, M. 2017. Heritage Language and Identity in Old and New Italian Migrants in Toronto. In Di Salvo, M. and Moreno, P. (eds.), Italian Communities Abroad: Multilingualism and Migration. Newcastle-upon-Tyne: Cambridge Scholars, 74–95.Google Scholar
Drapeau, L. 1998. Aboriginal Languages: Current Status. In Edwards, J. (ed.), Language in Canada. New York: Cambridge, 144–159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dressler, R. 2010. “There Is No Space for Being German”: Portraits of Willing and Reluctant Heritage Language Learners of German. Heritage Language Journal 7(2), 162–182.Google Scholar
Duff, P. and Li, D. (eds.) 2009. Indigenous, Minority, and Heritage Language Education in Canada: Policies, Contexts, and Issues. Canadian Modern Language Review 66(1). https://doi.org/10.3138/cmlr.66.1.001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duff, P., Brinton, D., Kagan, O., and Bauckus, S.. 2008. Heritage Language Education: A New Field Emerging. New York: Routledge, 71–90.Google Scholar
Edwards, J. (ed.) 1998. Language in Canada. New York: Cambridge.Google Scholar
Feuerverger, G. 1997. “On the Edges of the Map”: A Study of Heritage Language Teachers in Toronto. Teaching and Teacher Education 13(1), 39–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Foreign Affairs Canada. 2005. Asia in Focus. Canada World View 25, 5–9.Google Scholar
Giles, H., Bourhis, R., and Taylor, D.. 1977. Toward a Theory of Language in Ethnic Group Relations. In Giles, H. (ed.), Language, Ethnicity and Intergroup Relations. New York: Academic, 307–348.Google Scholar
Goldstein, T. 1997. Bilingual Life in a Multilingual High School Classroom: Teaching and Learning in Cantonese and English. The Canadian Modern Language Review/La Revue canadienne des langues vivantes 53(2), 356–372.Google Scholar
Government of Canada. 1991. Canadian Heritage Languages Institute Act (S.C. 1991, c. 7). Justice Laws website. https://laws-lois.justice.gc.ca/eng/acts/C-17.6/Google Scholar
Guardado, M. 2002. Loss and Maintenance of First Language Skills: Case Studies of Hispanic Families in Vancouver. Canadian Modern Language Review 58(3), 341–363.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guardado, M. 2014. The Discourses of Heritage Language Development: Engaging Ideologies in Canadian Hispanic Communities. Heritage Language Journal 11(1), 1–28.Google Scholar
Harrison, B. 2000. Passing on the Language: Heritage Language Diversity in Canada. Canadian Social Trends 58, 14–19.Google Scholar
Hildebrandt, Kristine A., Jany, C., and Silva, W. (eds.) 2017. Documenting Variation in Endangered Languages. Language Documentation & Conservation Special Publication no. 13. Honolulu: University of Hawai’i Press.Google Scholar
Houle, R. 2011. Recent Evolution of Immigrant-Language Transmission in Canada. Canadian Social Trends 11-008-X No. 92 2011002. Statistics Canada.Google Scholar
Houle, R. and Maheux, H.. 2017. Census in Brief: Children with an Immigrant Background: Bridging Cultures. Statistics Canada. www12.statcan.gc.ca/census-recensement/2016/as-sa/98-200-x/2016015/98–200-x2016015-eng.cfmGoogle Scholar
Ilitaqsiniq. no date. The Miqqut Project: Joining Literacy, Culture and Well-being through Non-formal Learning in Nunavut. Summary of the Research Report. Nunavut Literacy Council.Google Scholar
International Languages Educators’ Association. no date. About ILP [International Languages Program]. https://ilea.ca/news-2/ilp/Google Scholar
Jia, R. and Paradis, J.. 2015. The Use of Referring Expressions in Narratives by Mandarin Heritage Language Children and the Role of Language Environment Factors in Predicting Individual Differences. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 18(4), 737–752.Google Scholar
Jia, R. and Paradis, J.. 2018. The Acquisition of Relative Clauses by Mandarin Heritage Language Children. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism 18, 737–752.Google Scholar
Johannessen, J. B. 2015. The Corpus of American Norwegian Speech (CANS). In Megyesi, Béata (ed.), Proceedings of the 20th Nordic Conference of Computational Linguistics, NODALIDA 2015, May 11–13, 2015, Vilnius, Lithuania. NEALT Proceedings Series 23. http://tekstlab.uio.no/norskiamerika/english/corpus.htmlGoogle Scholar
Jones, R. 2018. TCDSB Opts to Keep Popular Program That Teaches Students Heritage Languages. CBC, Jul 13, 2018. www.cbc.ca/news/canada/toronto/tcdsb-opts-to-keep-popular-program-that-teaches-students-heritage-languages-1.4747074Google Scholar
Junker, M.-O. and Stewart, T.. 2011. A Linguistic Atlas for Endangered Languages: www.atlas-ling.ca. In Proceedings of EDULEARN 11: International Conference on Education and New Learning Technologies (3366–3377).Google Scholar
Kang, Y., George, S., and Soo, R.. 2016. Cross-Language Influence in the Stop Voicing Contrast in Heritage Tagalog. Heritage Language Journal 13(2), 184–218.Google Scholar
Kang, Y.-J. and Nagy, N.. 2016. VOT Merger in Heritage Korean in Toronto. Language Variation and Change 28(2), 249–272. https://doi.org/10.1017/S095439451600003XGoogle Scholar
LePage, J.-F. 2017. Census in Brief: Linguistic Diversity and Multilingualism in Canadian Homes. Statistics Canada. www12.statcan.gc.ca/census-recensement/2016/as-sa/98-200-x/2016010/98–200-x2016010-eng.cfmGoogle Scholar
Lin, Y. and Nicoladis, E.. 2018. Motion Lexicalization in Chinese among Heritage Language Children in Canada. Heritage Language Journal 15(3), 272–296.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Łyskawa, P. 2015. Variation in Case Marking in Heritage Polish. MA Thesis, Linguistics Department, University of Toronto. http://ngn.artsci.utoronto.ca/pdf/Lyskawa_2015_Variation in case marking in Heritage Polish.pdfGoogle Scholar
Łyskawa, P. and Nagy, N.. 2019. Case Marking Variation in Heritage Slavic Languages in Toronto: Not So Different. Language Learning. https://doi.org/10.1111/lang.12348Google Scholar
Łyskawa, P., Maddeaux, R., Melara, E., and Nagy, N.. 2016. Heritage Speakers Follow All the Rules: Language Contact and Convergence in Polish Devoicing. Heritage Language Journal 13(2), 219–244.Google Scholar
Manitoba Education. 2011. International and Heritage Languages. www.edu.gov.mb.ca/k12/cur/languages/Google Scholar
McKinnie, M. 2000. What Do You Want Me To Say, in Deutsch oder in English?: Code-Switching and Borrowing Strategies for Two Post–World War II German-Speaking Immigrants in Edmonton. In Zimmerman, L. and Froeschle, H. (eds.), German-Canadian Yearbook. Vol. XVI. Toronto: Historical Society of Mecklenburg Upper Canada, 171–188.Google Scholar
Meyerhoff, M. and Nagy, N. (eds.) 2008. Social Lives in Language – Sociolinguistics and Multilingual Speech Communities. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Montrul, S. 2012. Bilingualism and the Heritage Language Speaker. In Bhatia, T. K. and Ritchie, W. C. (eds.), The Handbook of Bilingualism and Multilingualism. Chichester and Malden, MA: Blackwell, 168–189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nagy, N. 2009. Heritage Language Variation and Change in Toronto. http://ngn.artsci.utoronto.ca/HLVC/1_5_publications.phpGoogle Scholar
Nagy, N. 2011a. A Multilingual Corpus to Explore Geographic Variation. Rassegna Italiana di Linguistica Applicata 43(1–2), 65–84.Google Scholar
Nagy, N. 2011b. Lexical Change and Language Contact: Faetar in Italy and Canada. Journal of Sociolinguistics 15, 366–382.Google Scholar
Nagy, N. 2015. A Sociolinguistic View of Null Subjects and VOT in Toronto Heritage Languages. Lingua 164B, 309–327.Google Scholar
Nagy, N. 2017a. Documenting Variation In (Endangered) Heritage Languages: How and Why? Language Documentation and Conservation SP13. http://nflrc.hawaii.edu/ldc/latest-posts/special-publications/#thirteenGoogle Scholar
Nagy, N. 2017b. Heritage Language Speakers in the University Classroom, Doing Research. In Trifonas, P. and Aravossitas, T. (eds.), International Handbook on Research and Practice in Heritage Language Education. Cham: Springer. https://link.springer.com/referenceworkentry/10.1007%2F978-3-319-38893-9_41-1Google Scholar
Nagy, N. 2018. Linguistic Attitudes and Contact Effects in Toronto’s Heritage Languages: A Variationist Sociolinguistic Investigation. International Journal of Bilingualism 22(4), 429–446. https://doi.org/10.1177/1367006918762160Google Scholar
Nagy, N. and Kochetov, A.. 2013. Voice Onset Time across the Generations: A Cross-Linguistic Study of Contact-Induced Change. In Siemund, P., Gogolin, I., Schulz, M., and Davydova, J. (eds.), Multilingualism and Language Contact in Urban Areas: Acquisition – Development – Teaching – Communication. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 19–38.Google Scholar
Nagy, N. and Lo, S.. 2019. Variation and Change in Heritage and Hong Kong Cantonese Classifiers. Asia-Pacific Language Variation 5(1), 84–108.Google Scholar
Nagy, N. and Meyerhoff, M.. 2008. The Social Lives of Linguistics. In Meyerhoff, M. and Nagy, N. (eds.), Social Lives in Language – Sociolinguistics and Multilingual Speech Communities. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 1–17.Google Scholar
Nagy, N., Iannozzi, M., and Heap, D.. 2018. Faetar Null Subjects: A Variationist Study of a Heritage Language in Contact. International Journal of the Sociology of Language 249, 31–47.Google Scholar
Nodari, R., Celata, C., and Nagy, N.. 2019. Socio-Indexical Phonetic Features in the Heritage Language Context: VOT in the Calabrian Community in Toronto. Journal of Phonetics 73, 91–112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wocn.2018.12.005Google Scholar
Noels, K. and Clément, R.. 1998. Language in Education: Bridging Educational Policy and Social Psychological Research. In Edwards, J. (ed.), Language in Canada. New York: Cambridge, 102–124.Google Scholar
Norris, M. J. 2007. Aboriginal Languages in Canada: Emerging Trends and Perspectives on Second Language Acquisition. Canadian Social Trends 83, 19–27. Statistics Canada catalogue no. 11-008.Google Scholar
O’Donnell, V. and Anderson, T.. 2017. Census in Brief: The Aboriginal languages of First Nations people, Métis and Inuit. Statistics Canada. www12.statcan.gc.ca/census-recensement/2016/as-sa/98-200-x/2016022/98–200-x2016022-eng.cfmGoogle Scholar
Oikonomakou, M., Aravossitas, T., and Skourtou, E.. 2018. Heritage Language Learners in Mixed University Classes: Language Skills, Attitudes, and Implications for Curriculum Development. In Trifonas, P. and Aravossitas, T. (eds.), Handbook of Research and Practice in Heritage Language Education. Cham: Springer, 75–113.Google Scholar
Page, B. R. and Putnam, M. T. (eds.) 2015. Moribund Germanic Heritage Languages in North America: Theoretical Perspectives and Empirical Findings. Leiden: Brill.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pappas, P. A. 2019. Stigmatized Dialectal Features in the Greek of Greek-Canadians. In Pennington, J. J., Friedman, V. A., and Grenoble, L. A. (eds.), And Thus You Are Everywhere Honored: Studies Dedicated to Brian D. Joseph. Bloomington, IN: Slavica Publishers, 267–282.Google Scholar
Pérez-Leroux, A.-T., Cuza, A., and Thomas, D.. 2011a. Clitic Placement in Spanish–English Bilingual Children. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 14(2), 221–232.Google Scholar
Pérez-Leroux, A.-T., Cuza, A., and Thomas, D.. 2011b. From Parental Attitudes to Input Conditions. In Potowski, Kim and Rothman, Jason (eds.), Bilingual Youth: Spanish in English-Speaking Societies. Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 149–176.Google Scholar
Poplack, S. 1980. Sometimes I’ll Start a Sentence In Spanish y Termino en Espanol: Toward a Typology of Code-Switching. Linguistics 18(7–8), 581–618.Google Scholar
Ricento, T. 2013. Language Policy, Ideology & Attitudes in English-Dominant Countries. In Bayley, R., Cameron, R., and Lucas, C. (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Sociolinguistics. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 525–544.Google Scholar
Sarkar, M. and Metallic, M. A.. 2009. Indigenizing the Structural Syllabus: The Challenge of Revitalizing Mi’gmaq in Listuguj. Canadian Modern Language Journal 66(1), 49–71. https://doi.org/10.3138/cmlr.66.1.049Google Scholar
Sekirin, P. and Courtois, J.. 1994. Endangered Dialect: Sociolinguistic Study of the Ukrainian Language in Canada. In Boudreau, A. and Dubois, L. (eds.), Sociolinguistique et aménagement des langues/Sociolinguistic Studies and Language Planning. Moncton, NB: Centre de recherche en linguistique appliquée, Université de Moncton, 145–153.Google Scholar
Sherkina-Lieber, M. 2010. Comprehension of Functional Morphemes by Labrador Inuttitut Receptive Bilinguals. In Proceedings of the Annual Boston University Conference on Language Development 34, 351–362.Google Scholar
Sherkina-Lieber, M. 2015. Tense, Aspect, and Agreement in Heritage Labrador Inuttitut: Do Receptive Bilinguals Understand Functional Morphology? Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism 5(1), 30–61.Google Scholar
Sherkina-Lieber, M. and Murasugi, K.. 2015. Noun Incorporation and Case in Heritage Inuktitut. Proceedings of the 2015 Annual Conference of the Canadian Linguistic Association. www.academia.edu/download/39937714/SherkinaLieber_Murasugi-2015.pdfGoogle Scholar
Sherkina-Lieber, M., Pérez-Leroux, A. T., and Johns, A.. 2011. Grammar without Speech Production: The Case of Labrador Inuttitut Heritage Receptive Bilinguals. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 14(3), 301–317.Google Scholar
Sorace, A. 2011. Pinning Down the Concept of “Interface” in Bilingualism. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism 1(1), 1–33.Google Scholar
Stanford, J. N. and Preston, D. R. (eds.) 2009. Variation in Indigenous Minority Languages. Vol. 25. Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Statistics Canada. 2012. Linguistic Characteristics of Canadians: Language, 2011 Census. Ottawa: Ministry of Industry. http://www.publications.gc.ca/site/eng/9.696712/publication.htmlGoogle Scholar
Statistics Canada. 2017a. Toronto [Census Metropolitan Area], Ontario and Canada [Country] (table). Census Profile. 2016 Census. Statistics Canada Catalogue no. 98-316-X2016001. Ottawa. https://www12.statcan.gc.ca/census-recensement/2016/dp-pd/index-eng.cfmGoogle Scholar
Statistics Canada. 2017b. 2016 Census: Immigrant Languages in Canada. www12.statcan.gc.ca/census-recensement/2016/dp-pd/prof/index.cfm?Lang=EGoogle Scholar
Statistics Canada. 2018. Data Tables, 2016 Census. Catalogue number 8-400-X2016199. https://www150.statcan.gc.ca/n1/en/catalogue/98-400-X2016199Google Scholar
Tasker, J. 2019. Ottawa Tables Legislation to Protect and Promote Indigenous Languages, Inuit Call It ‘Colonial’. CBC News, February 5, 2019. www.cbc.ca/news/politics/ottawa-indigenous-languages-legislation-1.5006504Google Scholar
Trifonas, P. and Aravossitas, T. (eds.) 2018. Handbook of Research and Practice in Heritage Language Education. Cham: Springer International Handbooks of Education.Google Scholar
Tse, H. 2016. Contact-Induced Splits In Toronto Heritage Cantonese Mid-Vowels. Linguistica Atlantica 35(2), 133–155.Google Scholar
Tse, H. 2017. Variation and Change in Toronto Heritage Cantonese: An Analysis of Two Monophthongs across Two Generations. Asia Pacific Language Variation 2(2), 124–156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tse, H. 2019. Beyond the Monolingual Core and Out into the Wild: A Variationist Study of Early Bilingualism and Sound Change in Toronto Heritage Cantonese. Doctoral Dissertation, University of Pittsburgh.Google Scholar
Turchetta, B. and Di Salvo, M.. 2018. Analisi dei dati quantitativi [Quantitative Data Analysis]. In Turchetta, B. and Vedovelli, M. (eds.), Lo spazio linguistico italiano globale: il caso dell’Ontario [The Global Italian Linguistic Space: The Case of Ontario]. Pisa: Pacini, 121–170.Google Scholar
Turchetta, B. and Vedovelli, M. (eds.) 2018. Lo spazio linguistico italiano globale: il caso dell’Ontario [The Global Italian Linguistic Space: The Case of Ontario]. Pisa: Pacini.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×