Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-grxwn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-05T17:54:23.846Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Bibliography

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 January 2025

John Marincola
Foreword by
Christopher Pelling
John Marincola
Affiliation:
Florida State University
Christopher Pelling
Affiliation:
University of Oxford
Get access

Summary

A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Authority and Tradition in Ancient Historiography , pp. 293 - 315
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2025

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adcock, F., Caesar as a Man of Letters (Cambridge 1961).Google Scholar
Alfoldy, G., ‘Herodians Person’, Anc. Soc. 2 (1971) 204–33.Google Scholar
Alonso-Núñez, J. M., ‘An Augustan World History: The Historicae Philippicae of Pompeius Trogus’, G&R 34 (1987) 56–72.Google Scholar
Alonso-Núñez, J. M. ‘The Emergence of Universal Historiography from the 4th to the 2nd centuries bc’, in Purposes of History. Studies in Greek Historiography from the 4th to the 2nd centuries BC, edd. Verdin, H., Schepens, G., and deKeyser, E. (Studia Hellenistica 30; Leuven 1990) 173–92.Google Scholar
Alonso-Núñez, J. M. ed., Geschichtsbild und Geschichtsdenken im Altertum (Darmstadt 1991).Google Scholar
Ambaglio, D., L’Opera Storiografica di Ellanico di Lesbo (Pisa 1980).Google Scholar
Ambaglio, D. ‘Fra hypomnemata e storiografia’, Athenaeum 68 (1990) 503–8.Google Scholar
Anderson, G., The Second Sophistic. A Cultural Phenomenon in the Roman Empire (London and New York 1993).Google Scholar
Andrei, O., A. Claudius Charax di Pergamo (Bologna 1984).Google Scholar
Armayor, O. K., ‘Herodotus’ Influence on Manethon and the Implications for Egyptology’, CB 61 (1985) 7–10.Google Scholar
Astin, A. E., Cato the Censor (Oxford 1979).Google Scholar
Atkinson, J. E., A Commentary on Q. Curtius Rufus’ Historiae Alexandri Magni Books 3 and 4 (Amsterdam 1980).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Attridge, H. W., The Interpretation of Biblical History in the Antiquitates Judaicae of Flavius Josephus (Missoula 1976).Google Scholar
Aubrion, E., Rhétorique et histoire chez Tacite (Metz 1985).Google Scholar
Avenarius, G., Lukians Schrift zur Geschichtsschreibung (Meisenheim am Glan 1956).Google Scholar
Ax, W., ‘Die Geschichtsschreibung bei Quintilian’ in id., ed., Memoria Rerum Veterum. Neue Beiträge zur antiken Historiographie und Alten Geschichte. Festschrift für Carl Joachim Classen z. 60. Geburtstag (Stuttgart 1990) 133–55.Google Scholar
Badian, E., Studies in Greek and Roman History (Oxford 1964).Google Scholar
Badian, E. ‘The Early Historians’, in Latin Historians, ed. Dorey, T. A. (London 1966) 1–38.Google Scholar
Badian, E. ‘Nearchus the Cretan’, YCS 24 (1975) 147–70.Google Scholar
Badian, E. ‘Livy and Augustus’, in Livius: Aspekte seines Werkes, ed. Schuller, W. (Konstanz 1993) 9–38.Google Scholar
Baldson, J. P. V. D., ‘Sulla Felix’,JRS 41 (1951) 1–10.Google Scholar
Baldson, J. P. V. D. ‘Some Questions about Historical Writing in the Second Century bc’, CQ n. s. 3 (1953) 158–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barber, E. L., The Historian Ephorus (Cambridge 1935).Google Scholar
Barnes, T. D., ‘The Composition of Cassius Dio’s Roman History’, Phoenix 38 (1984) 240–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barnes, T. D. ‘Literary Convention, Nostalgia and Reality in Ammianus Marcellinus’, in Reading the Past in Late Antiquity, edd. Clarke, G. et al. (Rushcutters Bay, Australia 1990) 59–92.Google Scholar
Barwick, K., ‘Die Gliederung der Narratio in der rhetorischen Theorie und ihre Bedeutung für die Geschichte des antiken Romans’, Hermes 63 (1928) 261–87.Google Scholar
Bates, R. L., Memoirs and the Perception of History in the Roman Republic (diss. Univ. of Pennsylvania 1983).Google Scholar
Bellemore, J., Nicolaus of Damascus: Life of Augustus (Bristol 1984).Google Scholar
Beltrametti, A., Erodoto. Una storia governata dal discorso. Il racconto morale come forma della memoria (Florence 1987).Google Scholar
Bering-Staschewski, R., Römische Zeitgeschichte bei Cassius Dio (Bochum 1981).Google Scholar
Bickerman, E., ‘Origenes Gentium’, CPh 47 (1952) 65–81.Google Scholar
Bigwood, J. M., ‘Ctesias’ Indica and Photius’, Phoenix 43 (1989) 302–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bloch, H., ‘Studies in the Historical Literature of the Fourth Century bc’, HSCP Suppl. 1 (1940)303–76.Google Scholar
Blockley, R. C., The Fragmentary Classicising Historians of the Later Roman Empire: Eiinapius, Olympiodorus, Priscus and Malchus, 2 vols. (Liverpool 1981–3).Google Scholar
Boedeker, D., ‘Simonides on Plataea: Narrative Elegy, Mythodic History’, ZPE 107 (1995) 217–29.Google Scholar
Börner, F., ‘Der Commentarius’, Hermes 81 (1953) 210–50.Google Scholar
Bompaire, J., Lucien écrivain (Paris 1958).Google Scholar
Boncquet, J., ‘Polybius on the Critical Evaluation of Historians’, Anc. Soc. 13-14 (1982–3) 277–91.Google Scholar
Bonner, S. F., The Literary Treatises of Dionysius of Halicarnassus (Cambridge 1939).Google Scholar
Bonner, S. F. Roman Declamation in the Late Republic and Early Empire (Liverpool 1949).Google Scholar
Bonner, S. F. Education in Ancient Rome (London and Berkeley 1977).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boor, C. de, ‘Römische Kaisergeschichte in byzantinischer Fassung’, BZ 1 (1892) 13–33.Google Scholar
Booth, W., The Rhetoric of Fiction (Chicago 2 1983).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bosworth, A. B., A Historical Commentary on Arrian’s History of Alexander (Oxford 1980- ).Google Scholar
Bosworth, A. B. From Arrian to Alexander (Oxford 1988).Google Scholar
Bosworth, A. B. ‘Arrian and Rome: The Minor Works’, ANRW II.34.1 (1993) 226–75.Google Scholar
Bowersock, G., Augustus and the Greek World (Oxford 1965).Google Scholar
Bowersock, G. Greek Sophists in the Roman Empire (Oxford 1969).Google Scholar
Bowie, E. L., ‘Greeks and their Past in the Second Sophistic’, in Studies in Ancient Society, ed. Finley, M. I. (London and Boston 1974) 166–209; orig. in Past and Present 46 (1970) 3–41.Google Scholar
Bowie, E. L. ‘Lies, Fiction and Slander in Early Greek Poetry’, in Lies and Fiction in the Ancient World, edd. Gill, C. and Wiseman, T. P. (Exeter and Austin, Tex. 1993)1–37.Google Scholar
Bowie, E. L. ‘The Readership of Greek Novels in the Ancient World’, in The Search for the Ancient Novel, ed. Tatum, J. (Baltimore and London 1994) 435–59.Google Scholar
Breebaart, A. B., Enige historiografische aspecten van Arrianus’ Anabasis Alexandri (Leiden 1960).Google Scholar
Breitenbach, H., Historiographische Anschauungsformen Xenophons (Freiburg i. d. Schweiz 1950).Google Scholar
Breitenbach, H. ‘Xenophon von Athen’, RE IX. A. 2 (1967) 1569–2052.Google Scholar
Breitenbach, H. ‘Hellenika Oxyrhynchia’, RE Suppl. XII (1970) 383–426.Google Scholar
Bremmer, J. and Horsfall, N., edd., Roman Myth and Mythography (London 1987).Google Scholar
Briscoe, J., A Commentary on Livy XXXI-XXXIII (Oxford 1973; repr. with addenda 1989).Google Scholar
Brodersen, K., ‘Appian und sein Werk’, ANRW II. 34.1 (1993) 339–63.Google Scholar
Brown, T. S., Timaeus of Tauromenium (Berkeley 1958).Google Scholar
Brown, T. S. ‘Suggestions for a Vita of Ctesias of Cnidus’, Historia 27 (1978) 1–19.Google Scholar
Bruce, I. A. F., A Historical Commentary on the Hellenica Oxyrhynchia (Cambridge 1967).Google Scholar
Brunt, P. A., ‘Cicero and Historiography’, in Studies in Greek History and Thought (Oxford 1993) 181–209; orig. in ΦΙΛΙΑΣ XAPIN. Miscellanea di Studi Classici in onore di Eugenio Manni (Rome 1980) 1.311–40.Google Scholar
Brunt, P. A. ‘On Historical Fragments and Epitomes’, CQ n. s. 30 (1980) 477–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bucher, G., ‘The Annales Maximi in the Light of Roman Methods of Keeping Records’, AJAH 12 (1987 [1995]) 2–61.Google Scholar
Bung, P., Quintus Fabius Pictor, der erste römische Annalist (diss. Cologne 1950).Google Scholar
Burstein, S., The Bahyloniaca of Berossus (Malibu, Calif. 1978).Google Scholar
Burstein, S. Agatharchides of Cnidus: On the Erythraean Sea (London 1989).Google Scholar
Burton, A., Diodorus Siculus. Book I. A Commentary (Leiden 1972).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cairns, F., Generic Composition in Greek and Roman Poetry (Edinburgh 1972).Google Scholar
Cameron, A., ‘Introduction: The Writing of History’, in ead., ed., History as Text (London and Chapel Hill 1989) 1–10.Google Scholar
Cancik-Lindemaier, H. and Cancik, H., ‘Zensur und Gedächtnis: Zu Tacitus, Annales iv. 32–38’, AU 29. 4 (1986) 16–35.Google Scholar
Canfora, L., ‘Il ciclo storico’,Belfagor 26 (1971) 653–70.Google Scholar
Canfora, L. ‘Le but de l’historiographie selon Diodore’, in Purposes of History. Studies in Greek Historiography from the 4th to the 2nd centuries bc, edd. Verdin, H., Schepens, G., and deKeyser, E. (Studia Hellenistica 30; Leuven 1990) 313–22.Google Scholar
Caplan, H., [Cicero] ad C. Herennium (London and Cambridge, Mass. 1954).Google Scholar
Cawkwell, G., ‘Introduction’ to Xenophon: The Persian Expedition (Harmonds-worth 1972) 9–48.Google Scholar
Cawkwell, G. ‘Introduction’ to Xenophon: A History of My Times (Hellenica) (Harmonds-worth 1979) 7–46.Google Scholar
Champlin, E., Fronto and Antonine Rome (Cambridge, Mass. 1980).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chaniotis, A., Historie und Historiker in der griechischen Inschriften. Epigraphische Beiträge zur griechischen Historiographie (Wiesbaden 1988).Google Scholar
Chassignet, M., Caton: Les Origines (Paris 1986).Google Scholar
Chilver, G. E. F., A Historical Commentary on Tacitus’ Histories I and II (Oxford 1979).Google Scholar
Chilver, G. E. F. A Historical Commentary on Tacitus’ Histories IV and V, completed and revised by Townend, G. B. (Oxford 1985).Google Scholar
Chodnicek, J., ‘Uber die Gründe der theoretischen Excurse und Bemerkungen des Polybius’, in Neunzehnter Jahresbericht des K. K. Gymnasium, im 3. Bezirk in Wien (Vienna 1888).Google Scholar
Christ, M. R., ‘Theopompus and Herodotus: A Reassessment’, CQ n.s. 43 (1993) 47–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clark, D. L., ‘Imitation: Theory and Practice in Roman Rhetoric’, Quart. Journ. Speech 37 (1951) 11–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cohen, S. J. D., Josephus in Galilee and Rome. His Vita and Development as a Historian (Leiden 1979).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Collins, J. H., ‘Caesar as a Political Propagandist’, ANRW I. 1 (1972) 922–66.Google Scholar
Connor, W. R., ‘History without Heroes. Theopompus’ Treatment of Philip of Macedon’, GRBS 8 (1967) 133–54.Google Scholar
Connor, W. R. Thucydides (Princeton 1984).Google Scholar
Connor, W. R. ‘Narrative Discourse in Thucydides’, in The Greek Historians: Literature and History. Papers Presented to A. E. Raubitschek, ed. Jameson, M. H. (Saratoga, Calif. 1985) 1–17.Google Scholar
Cornell, T. J., ‘The historical tradition of early Rome’, in Past Perspectives. Studies in Greek and Roman Historical Writing, edd. Moxon, I. S., Smart, J. D., and Woodman, A.J. (Cambridge 1986) 67–86.Google Scholar
Cova, P., Iprincipia historiae e le idee storiografiche di Frontone (Naples 1970).Google Scholar
D’Alton, J. F., Roman Literary Theory and Criticism (New York 1931).Google Scholar
Darbo-Peschanski, C., Le discours du particulier (Paris 1987).Google Scholar
Davidson, J., ‘The Gaze of Polybius’ Histories’, JRS 81 (1991) 10–24.Google Scholar
Defosse, P., ‘Apropos du début insolite des “Helléniques”’, Rev. Belge 46 (1968) 5–24.Google Scholar
Dessau, H., ‘Die Vorrede des Livius’ in id., ed., Festschrift ... Otto Hirschfeld (Berlin 1903) 461–6.Google Scholar
Develin, R., ‘Tacitus and the techniques of insidious suggestion’, Antichthon 17 (1983) 64–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dewald, C., ‘Narrative Surface and Authorial Voice in Herodotus’ Histories’, Arethusa 20 (1987) 147–70.Google Scholar
Dickie, M. W., ‘The Disavowal of invidia in Roman Iamb and Satire’, PLLS 3 (1981) 183–208.Google Scholar
Dihle, A., ‘The Conception of India in Hellenistic and Roman Literature’, PCPhS n.s. 10 (1964) 15–23.Google Scholar
Dillery, J., Xenophon and the History of his Times (London and New York 1995).Google Scholar
Dodds, E. R., Pagan and Christian in an Age of Anxiety (Cambridge 1965).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dover, K. J., Thucydides (Greece and Rome New Surveys in the Classics, No. 7; Oxford 1973).Google Scholar
Dowden, K., ‘Apuleius and the Art of Narration’, CQ n.s. 32 (1982) 419–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dowden, K. ‘The Roman Audience of The Golden Ass’ in The Search for the Ancient Novel, ed. Tatum, J. (Baltimore and London 1994) 419–34.Google Scholar
Drews, R., The Greek Accounts of Eastern History (Cambridge, Mass. 1973).Google Scholar
Drexler, H., Ammianstudien (Hildesheim and New York 1974).Google Scholar
DuQuesnay, I. M., ‘Vergil’s First Eclogue’, PLLS 3 (1981) 29–182.Google Scholar
Earl, D. C., The Political Thought of Sallust (Cambridge 1961).Google Scholar
Earl, D. C. ‘Prologue Form in Ancient Historiography’, ANRWI. 2 (1972) 842–56.Google Scholar
Eck, B., ‘Sur la vie de Ctésias’, REG 103 (1990) 409–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Edelstein, L. and Kidd, I. G., Posidonius I. The Fragments (Cambridge 2 1989).Google Scholar
Eden, P. T., ‘Caesar’s Style: Inheritance versus Intelligence’, Glotta 40 (1962) 74–117.Google Scholar
Egermann, F., Die Proömien zu den Werken des Sallust (Vienna and Leipzig 1932).Google Scholar
Ek, S., Herodotismen in der Archäologie des Dionys von Halikarnass (Lund 1942).Google Scholar
Ek, S. ‘Eine Stiltendenz in der Römischen Archäologie des Dionysios von Halikarnass’, Eranos 43 (1945) 198–214.Google Scholar
Else, G., Aristotle’s Poetics: The Argument (Cambridge, Mass. and Leiden 1957).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Engel, G., De antiquorum epicorum didacticorum historicorum prooemiis (diss. Marburg 1910).Google Scholar
Erbse, H., Studien zum Verständnis Herodots (Berlin and New York 1992).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Errington, R. M., ‘Bias in Ptolemy’s History of Alexander’, CQ n. s. 19 (1969) 233–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Evans, J. A. S., Herodotus. Explorer of the Past (Princeton 1991).Google Scholar
Fantham, E., ‘Imitation and Evolution: The Discussion of Rhetorical Imitation in Cicero De Oratore 2. 87-97 and some Related Problems of Ciceronian Theory’, CPh 73 (1978) 1–16.Google Scholar
Fantham, E. ‘Imitation and Decline: Rhetorical Theory and Practice in the First Century after Christ’, CPh 73 (1978) 102–16.Google Scholar
Farrar, C., The Origins of Democratic Thinking (Cambridge 1988).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fehling, D., ‘Zur Funktion und Formgeschichte des Proömiums in der älteren griechischen Prosa’, in ΔωPHMA: Festschrift ... H. Diller (Athens 1975) 61–75.Google Scholar
Fehling, D. Herodotus and his ‘Sources’, translated by Howie, J. G. (Leeds 1989); revised and expanded edition of Die Quellenangaben bei Herodot. Studien zur Erzählkunst Herodots (Berlin and New York 1971).Google Scholar
Flach, D., ‘Die Vorrede zu Sallusts Historien in neuer Rekonstruktion’, Philologus 117 (1973) 76–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Flory, S., ‘Who Read Herodotus’ Histories?’, AJPh 101 (1980) 12–28.Google Scholar
Flory, S. ‘The Meaning of τó μυθώδεζ (1.22.4) and the Usefulness of Thucydides’ History’, CJ 85 (1990) 193–208.Google Scholar
Flower, H. I., ‘Fabulae Praetextae in Context: When Were Plays on Contemporary Subjects Performed in Republican Rome?’, CQ 45 (1995) 170–90.Google Scholar
Flower, M. A., Theopompus of Chios. History and Rhetoric in the Fourth Century BC (Oxford 1994).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fornara, C. W., Herodotus. An Interpretative Essay (Oxford 1971).Google Scholar
Fornara, C. W. The Nature of History in Ancient Greece and Rome (Berkeley, London, and Los Angeles 1983).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fornara, C. W. ‘Studies in Ammianus Marcellinus. i. The Letter of Libanius and Ammianus’ Connection with Antioch’, Historia 41 (1992) 328–44.Google Scholar
Fornara, C. W. ‘Studies in Ammianus Marcellinus. ii. Ammianus’ Knowledge and Use of Greek and Latin Literature’, Historia 41 (1992) 420–38.Google Scholar
Fox, M., ‘History and Rhetoric in Dionysius of Halicarnassus’, JRS 83 (1993) 31–47.Google Scholar
Fraenkel, E., ‘Ein Form römischer Kriegsbulletin’, in Kleine Beiträge zur klassischen Philologie (Rome 1964) 11.69–73; orig. in Eranos 54 (1956) 189–94.Google Scholar
Fraenkel, E. Horace (Oxford 1957).Google Scholar
Fraser, P., Ptolemaic Alexandria, 3 vols. (Oxford 1972).Google Scholar
Frier, B. W., Libri Annales Pontificum Maximorum: The Origins of the Annalistic Tradition (Rome 1979).Google Scholar
Fritz, K. von, Die griechische Geschichtsschreibung, 2 vols. (Berlin and New York 1967).Google Scholar
Funaioli, G., ‘Livius im Plane seines Werkes’, Die Antike 19 (1943) 214–30.Google Scholar
Furneaux, H., ed., The Annals of Tacitus, 2 vols. (Oxford 1896, 21907).Google Scholar
Gabba, E., ‘Storici greci dell’impero romano da Augusto ai Severi’, RSI 71 (1959) 361–81.Google Scholar
Gabba, E. ‘True History and False History in Classical Antiquity’, JRS 71 (1981) 50–62.Google Scholar
Gabba, E. ‘The Historians and Augustus’, in Caesar Augustus: Seven Aspects, edd. Millar, F. and Segal, E. (Oxford 1984) 61–88.Google Scholar
Gabba, E. Dionysius and the History of Archaic Rome (Berkeley and Los Angeles 1991).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Geffcken, J., Timaios’ Geographie des Westens (Berlin 1892).Google Scholar
Geizer, M., ‘Römische Politik bei Fabius Pictor’, in Kleine Schriften iii.51-92; orig. in Hermes 68 (1933) 129–66.Google Scholar
Geizer, M. ‘Der Anfang römischer Geschichtsschreibung’, in Kleine Schriften iii.92-103; orig. in Hermes 69 (1934) 46–55.Google Scholar
Geizer, M. ‘Nochmals über den Anfang römischer Geschichtsschreibung’, in Kleine Schriften iii.104-10; orig. in Hermes 82 (1954) 342–8.Google Scholar
Geizer, M. ‘Die pragmatische Geschichtsschreibung des Polybios’, in Kleine Schriften iii.155-60; orig. in Festschrift für C. Weickert (Berlin 1955) 87–91.Google Scholar
Geizer, M. ‘Über die Arbeitsweise des Polybios’, in Kleine Schriften iii.161-90; orig. in SHAW Phil-hist. Kl. Abh.3 (Heidelberg 1956).Google Scholar
Geizer, M. ‘Caesar als Historiker’ in Kleine Schriften 11.307-35.Google Scholar
Geizer, M. Kleine Schriften, 3 vols., edd. Strasburger, H. and Meier, C. (Wiesbaden 1964).Google Scholar
Genette, G., Narrative Discourse (Ithaca 1980).Google Scholar
Georgiadou, A. and Larmour, D., ‘Lucian and Historiography: “De Historia Conscribenda”and “Verae Historiae’”, ANRW II. 34.2 (1994) 1448–508.Google Scholar
Gill, C., ‘The Ethos/Pathos Distinction in Rhetorical and Literary Criticism’, CQ n. s. 34 (1984) 149–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gill, C. and Wiseman, T. P., edd., Lies and Fiction in the Ancient World (Exeter and Austin, Tex. 1993).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ginsburg, J., Tradition and Theme in the Annals of Tacitus (New York 1981).Google Scholar
Ginsburg, J. ‘In maiores certamina: Past and Present in the Annals’, in Tacitus and the Tacitean Tradition, edd. Luce, T. J. and Woodman, A. J. (Princeton 1993) 86–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gürier, W., ‘Die Veränderung des Erzählerstandpunktes in Caesars Bellum Gallicum’, Poetica 8 (1976) 95–119.Google Scholar
Gold, B. K., Literary Patronage in Greece and Rome (Chapel Hill and London 1987).Google Scholar
Gomme, A. W., Andrewes, A. and Dover, K. J., A Historical Commentary on Thucydides, 5 vols. (Oxford 1941–79).Google Scholar
Goodyear, F. R. D., The Annals of Tacitus I: Annals 1.1-54 (Cambridge 1972).Google Scholar
Goodyear, F. R. D. Tacitus (Greece and Rome New Surveys in the Classics, No. 4; Oxford 2 1979).Google Scholar
Goodyear, F. R. D. The Annals of Tacitus II: Annals 1.55–81 and Annals 2 (Cambridge 1981).Google Scholar
Goodyear, F. R. D. ‘On the Character and Text of Justin’s Compilation of Trogus’, in Papers on Latin Literature (London 1992) 210–23; orig. in PACA 16 (1982) 1–24.Google Scholar
Gossman, L., Between History and Literature (Cambridge, Mass. 1990).Google Scholar
Gould, J., Herodotus (London 1989).Google Scholar
Grant, M., Greek and Roman Historians: Information and Misinformation (London and New York 1995).Google Scholar
Gray, V., ‘Mimesis in Greek Historical Writing, AJPh 108 (1987) 467–86.Google Scholar
Gray, V. The Character of Xenophon’s Hellenica (London and Baltimore 1989).Google Scholar
Gray, V. ‘The Moral Interpretation of Arrian’s Anabasis’, JHS 110 (1990) 180–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gray, V. ‘Continuous History and Xenophon, Hellenica ’,AJPh 112 (1991) 201–28.Google Scholar
Griffin, J., Homer on Life and Death (Oxford 1980).Google Scholar
Griffin, J. ‘Die Ursprünge der Historien Herodots’, in Memoria Rerum Veterum. Neue Beiträge zur antiken Historiographie und Alten Geschichte. Festschrift für Carl Joachim Classen z. 60. Geburtstag, ed. Ax, W. (Stuttgart 1990) 51–82.Google Scholar
Griffith, G. T., ‘Some Habits of Thucydides when introducing Persons’, PCPhS 187 (1961) 21–33.Google Scholar
Gruen, E., Culture and National Identity in Republican Rome (Ithaca 1992).Google Scholar
Hägg, T., Narrative Technique in Ancient Greek Romances (Lund 1971).Google Scholar
Hägg, T. The Novel in Antiquity (London and Berkeley 1983).Google Scholar
Halbfas, F., Theorie und Praxis in der Geschichtsschreibung bei Dionys von Halikarnass (diss. Münster 1910).Google Scholar
Halliwell, S., Aristotle’s Poetics (London and Chapel Hill 1986).Google Scholar
Hamilton, J. R., Plutarch: Alexander. A Commentary (Oxford 1969).Google Scholar
Hansen, M. H., ‘The Battle Exhortation in Ancient Historiography: Fact or Fiction’, Historia 42 (1993) 161–80.Google Scholar
Harding, P., Androtion and the Atthis (Oxford 1994).Google Scholar
Harris, W., Ancient Literacy (Cambridge, Mass. 1990).Google Scholar
Havelock, E., Preface to Plato (New Haven 1964).Google Scholar
Heldmann, K., Antike Theorien über Entwickhing und Verfall der Redekunst (Munich 1982).Google Scholar
Hengst, D. den, ‘The Scientific Digressions in Ammianus’ Res Gestae’, in Cognitio Gestorum. The Historiographic Art of Ammianus Marcellinus, edd. den Boeft, J., den Hengst, D., and Teitler, H. C. (Amsterdam et al. 1992) 39–46.Google Scholar
Henry, W. P., Greek Historical Writing. A Historiographical Essay Based on Xenophon’s Hellenica (Chicago 1967).Google Scholar
Herkommer, E., Die topoi in den Proömien der römischen Geschichtswerke (Tübingen 1968).Google Scholar
Hermann, W., Die Historien des Coelius Antipater (Meisenheim am Glan 1979).Google Scholar
Herzog, R., ed., Restauration und Erneuerung. Die lateinische Literatur von 284 bis 374 n. Chr. (Munich 1989).Google Scholar
Heubeck, A., West, S. and Hainsworth, J. B., A Commentary on the Odyssey I. Introduction and Books i-viii (Oxford 1988).Google Scholar
Heuss, A., ‘Alexander der Grosse und die politische Ideologie des Altertums’, A&A 4 (1954) 65–104.Google Scholar
Holford-Strevens, L., Aulus Gellius (London 1988; Chapel Hill 1989).Google Scholar
Homeyer, H., Lukian: wie man Geschichte schreiben soll (Munich 1965).Google Scholar
Hornblower, J., Hieronymus of Cardia (Oxford 1981).Google Scholar
Hornblower, S., Thucydides (London and Baltimore 1987).Google Scholar
Hornblower, S. A Commentary on Thucydides (Oxford 1991- ).Google Scholar
Hornblower, S. ‘Introduction’ in id., ed., Greek Historiography 1–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hornblower, S. ‘Narratology and Narrative Technique in Thucydides’ in id., ed., Greek Historiography 131–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hornblower, S. ed., Greek Historiography (Oxford 1994).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hornblower, S. ‘The Fourth-Century and Hellenistic Reception of Thucydides’, JHS 115 (1995) 47–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Howald, E., Vorn Geist antiker Geschichtsschreibung (Munich and Berlin 1944).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hüber, L., ‘Herodots Homerverständnis’, in Synusia: Festgabe ... W. Schadewaldt, edd. Flashar, H. and Gaiser, K. (Pfullingen 1965) 29–52.Google Scholar
Humphreys, S. C., ‘Social Relations on Stage: Witnesses in Classical Athens’, History and Anthropology 1 (1985) 313–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hunger, H., Die hochsprachliche profane Literatur der Byzantiner, vol. 1 (Munich 1978).Google Scholar
Hunter, V., Past and Process in Herodotus and Thucydides (Princeton 1982).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hurst, A., ‘Un critique grec dans la Rome d’Auguste: Denys d’Halicarnasse’, ANRW II.30.1 (1982) 839–65.Google Scholar
Huxley, G. L., ‘Aristotle as Antiquary’, GRBS 14 (1973) 271–86.Google Scholar
Huxley, G. L. Herodotus and the Epic (Athens 1989).Google Scholar
Ibendorff, E., Untersuchungen zur darstellerischen Persönlichkeit des Polybios (Rostock 1930).Google Scholar
Isnardi, M., ‘Tέχνη e ήθοϛ nella metodologia storiografica di Polibio’, SCO 3 (1955) 102–10.Google Scholar
Jacoby, F., Die Fragmente der griechischen Historiker (Berlin and Leiden 1922–56; Leiden 1994- ).Google Scholar
Jacoby, F. ‘Über die Entwicklung der griechischen Historiographie und den Plan einer neuen Sammlung der griechischen Historikerfragmente’, in Abhandlungen 16–72; orig. in Klio 9 (1909) 80–123.Google Scholar
Jacoby, F. ‘Hekataios (3) von Milet’, RE VII.2 (1912) 2667–750.Google Scholar
Jacoby, F. ‘Hekataios (4) aus Abdera’, RE VII.2 (1912) 2750–69.Google Scholar
Jacoby, F. ‘Herodotos’, RE Suppl. II (1913) 205–520.Google Scholar
Jacoby, F. ‘Kephalion’, RE XI.1 (1921) 191–2.Google Scholar
Jacoby, F. ‘Ktesias’, RE XI.2 (1922) 2032–73.Google Scholar
Jacoby, F. Atthis. The Local Chronicles of Ancient Athens (Oxford 1949).Google Scholar
Jacoby, F. Abhandlungen zur griechischen Geschichtsschreibung, ed. Bloch, H. (Leiden 1956).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jal, P., ‘Pline et l’historiographie latine’, Helmantica 38 (1987) 171–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Janson, T., Latin Prose Prefaces. Studies in Literary Conventions (Stockholm 1964).Google Scholar
Jones, C. P., Culture and Society in Lucian (Cambridge, Mass. 1986).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jong, I. J. F. de, Narrators and Focalizers. The Presentation of the Story in the Iliad (Amsterdam 1987).Google Scholar
Jong, I. J. F. ‘The Subjective Style in Odysseus’ Wanderings’, CQ n. s. 42 (1992) 1–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kajanto, L., ‘Fortuna’, ANRW II. 17.1 (1981) 502–58.Google Scholar
Kaster, R. A., Suetonius: De Grammaticis et Rhetoribus (Oxford 1995).Google Scholar
Keitel, E., ‘Homeric Antecedents to the Cohortatio in the Ancient Historians’, CW 80 (1986/7) 153–72.Google Scholar
Kennedy, G., The Art of Persuasion in Greece (Princeton 1963).Google Scholar
Kennedy, G. The Art of Rhetoric in the Roman World (Princeton 1972).Google Scholar
Kennedy, G. Greek Rhetoric under Christian Emperors (Princeton 1983).Google Scholar
Kidd, I. G., Poseidonius ii. Commentary (Cambridge 1989).Google Scholar
Kidd, I. G. ‘Posidonius as Philosopher-Historian’ in Philosophia Togata, edd. Griffin, M. and Barnes, J. (Oxford 1989) 38–50.Google Scholar
Kindstrand, J. F., Homer in der zweiten Sophistik (Uppsala 1973).Google Scholar
Kirk, G. S., The Iliad: A Commentary. I. Books i-iv (Cambridge 1985).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klingner, F., ‘Tacitus und die Geschichtsschreiber des 1. Jahrhunderts n. Chr.’, in Römische Geisteswelt (Munich 5 1965) 483–503; orig. in MH 15 (1958) 194–206.Google Scholar
Koerner, R., ‘Polybios als Kritiker früherer Historiker’, WZ Jena 6 (1956/57) 547-8; summary in Polybios, edd. Stiewe, N. and Holzberg, K., 327–31.Google Scholar
Koestermann, E., Tacitus. Annalen, 4 vols. (Heidelberg 1963–8).Google Scholar
Kohl, R., De scholasticarum declamationum argumentis ex historia petitis (Paderborn 1915).Google Scholar
Kranz, W., Studien zur antiken Literatur und ihrem Fortwirken (Heidelberg 1967).Google Scholar
Kraus, C. S., Livy: Ab Urbe Condita. Book VI (Cambridge 1994).Google Scholar
Krentz, P.,Xenophon: Hellenika i-ii.3.10 (Warminster 1989).Google Scholar
Krischer, T., ‘Herodots Prooemium’, Hermes 93 (1965) 159–67.Google Scholar
Kroll, W., Studien zum Verständnis der römischen Literatur (Stuttgart 1924).Google Scholar
Kroll, W. ‘Rhetorik’, RE Suppl. VII (1940) 1039–138.Google Scholar
Kuhrt, A., ‘Berossus’ Babyloniaka and Seleucid Rule in Babylonia’, in ead. and Sherwin-White, S., edd., Hellenism in the East (London and Berkeley 1987) 32–56.Google Scholar
Laistner, M. L. W., The Greater Roman Historians (Berkeley 1947).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lanata, G., Poetica Pre-Platonica (Florence 1963).Google Scholar
La Penna, A., ‘Storiografia di Senatori e storiografia di letterati’, in Aspetti del pensiero storico classico (Turin 1978) 43–104.Google Scholar
Lateiner, D., ‘The Empirical Element in the Methods of Early Greek Medical Writers and Herodotus: A Shared Epistemological Response’, Antichthon 20 (1986) 1–20.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lateiner, D. The Historical Method of Herodotus (Toronto 1989).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lausberg, H., Handbuch der literarischen Rhetorik, 2 vols. (Munich 2 1973).Google Scholar
Lebek, W., Verba Prisca. Die Anfänge des Archaisierens in der lateinischen Beredsamkeit und Geschichtsschreibung (Göttingen 1970).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leeman, A. D., A Systematical Bibliography to Sallust (1879–1950) (Leiden 1952).Google Scholar
Leeman, A. D. Orationis Ratio. The Stylistic Theories and Practice of the Roman Orators, Historians and Philosophers, 2 vols. (Amsterdam 1963).Google Scholar
Leeman, A. D. ‘Structure and Meaning in the Prologues of Tacitus’, in Form und Sinn. Studien zur römischen Literatur (1954–1984) (Frankfurt am Main et al. 1985) 317-48; orig in ΥCS 23 (1973) 169–208.Google Scholar
Lefkowitz, M., ‘The First Person in Pindar’, in First-Person Fictions 1-71; orig.in HSCP 67 (1963) 177–253.Google Scholar
Lefkowitz, M. ‘The Poet as Hero’, in First-Person Fictions 111-26; orig. in CQ n.s. 28 (1978) 459–69.Google Scholar
Lefkowitz, M. The Lives of the Greek Poets (Baltimore and London 1981).Google Scholar
Lefkowitz, M. ‘The Poet as Athlete’, in First-Person Fictions 161-8; orig. in SIFC 3rd ser. 2 (1984) 5–12.Google Scholar
Lefkowitz, M. First-Person Fictions. Pindar’s Poetic ‘I’ (Oxford 1992).Google Scholar
Lehmann, G. A., ‘Polybios und die ältere und zeitgenössische griechische Geschichtsschreibung: einige Bemerkungen’, in Polybe (Entretiens Hardt 20; Geneva 1973) 145–200; discussion, 201–5.Google Scholar
Lemerle, P., La première humanisme Byzantine (Paris 1971).Google Scholar
Lévy, E., ‘L’art de la déformation historique dans les Hélleniques de Xenophon’, in Purposes of History. Studies in Greek Historiography from the 4th to the 2nd centuries bc, edd. Verdin, H., Schepens, G., and deKeyser, E. (Studia Hellenistica 30; Leuven 1990) 125–57.Google Scholar
Lewis, R. G., ‘Imperial Autobiography, Augustus to Hadrian’, ANRW II. 34. 1 (1993) 629–706.Google Scholar
Lieberich, H., Studien zu den Proömien in der griechischen und byzantinischen Geschichtsschreibung. I. Teil, Die griechischen Geschichtsschreiber (Munich 1898).Google Scholar
Lindner, H., Die Geschichtsauffassung des Flavius Josephus im Bellum Judaicum (Leiden 1972).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lloyd, G. E. R., Polarity and Analogy. Two Types of Argumentation in Early Greek Thought (Cambridge 1966).Google Scholar
Lloyd, G. E. R. Magic, Reason and Experience. Studies in the Origin and Development of Greek Science (Cambridge 1979).Google Scholar
Lloyd, G. E. R. The Revolutions of Wisdom (Berkeley and Los Angeles 1987).Google Scholar
Lloyd, G. E. R. ‘Adversaries and Authorities’, PCPhS n. s. 40 (1994) 27–48.Google Scholar
Loraux, N., ‘Ponos. Sur quelques difficultés de la peine comme nom de travail’, AION (Arch.) 4 (1982) 171–92.Google Scholar
Loraux, N. The Invention of Athens. The Funeral Oration in the Classical City (Cambridge, Mass. and London 1986) Eng. tr. by A. Sheridan of L’invention d’Athènes. Histoire de l’oraison funèbre dans la ‘cité classique' (Paris 1981).Google Scholar
Lorenz, K., Untersuchungen zum Geschichtswerk des Polybios (Stuttgart 1931).Google Scholar
Lucas, D. W., Aristotle: Poetics (Oxford 1968).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Luce, T. J., ‘The Dating of Livy’s First Decade’, TAPA 96 (1965) 209–40.Google Scholar
Luce, T. J. Livy: The Composition of his History (Princeton 1977).Google Scholar
Luce, T. J. ‘Tacitus’ Conception of Historical Change’, in Past Perspectives. Studies in Greek and Roman Historical Writing, edd. Moxon, I. S., Smart, J. D., and Woodman, A. J. (Cambridge 1986) 143–57.Google Scholar
Luce, T. J. ‘Ancient Views on the Causes of Bias in Historical Writing’, CPh 84 (1989) 16–31.Google Scholar
Luce, T. J. ‘Livy, Augustus and the Forum Augustus’ in Between Republic and Empire, edd. Raaflaub, K. and Toher, M. (Berkeley 1990) 123–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Luce, T. J. ‘Tacitus on “History’s Highest Function”: praecipuum munus annalium', ANRWU. 33.4 (1991) 2904–27.Google Scholar
MacLaren, M., ‘Xenophon and Themistogenes’, TAPA 65 (1934) 240–7.Google Scholar
Macleod, C., ‘Thucydides on Faction (3.82-83)’ in Collected Essays (Oxford 1983) 123-39; orig. in PCPhS n.s. 25 (1979) 52–68.Google Scholar
Macleod, M. D., Lucian: A Selection (Warminster 1991).Google Scholar
Maehler, H., Die Auffassung des Dichterberufs im frühen Griechentum bis zur Zeit Pindars (Göttingen 1963).Google Scholar
Malitz, J., Die Historien des Poseidonios (Munich 1983).Google Scholar
Malitz, J. ‘Das Interesse an der Geschichte. Die griechischen Historiker und ihr Publikum’, in Purposes of History. Studies in Greek Historiography from the 4th to the 2nd centuries BC, edd. Verdin, H., Schepens, G., and deKeyser, E. (Studia Hellenistica 30; Leuven 1990) 323–49.Google Scholar
Marincola, J., ‘Herodotean Narrative and the Narrator’s Presence’, Arethusa 20 (1987) 121–37.Google Scholar
Marincola, J. ‘Some Suggestions on the Proem and “Second Preface” of Arrian’s Anabasis', JHS 109 (1989) 186–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marincola, J. ‘Plutarch’s Refutation of Herodotus’, AncW 20 (1994) 191–203.Google Scholar
Marrou, H. Histoire de l’Education dans l’Antiquité, 2 vols. (Paris 7 1975).Google Scholar
Marshall, A. J., ‘Library Resources and Creative Writing at Rome’, Phoenix 30 (1976)252-64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martin, J., Antike Rhetorik: Technik und Method (Munich 1974).Google Scholar
Martin, R. H., Tacitus (Berkeley and London 1981).Google Scholar
Martin, R. H. and Woodman, A. J., edd., Tacitus: Annals iv(Cambridge 1989).Google Scholar
Matthews, J., ‘Ammianus’ Historical Evolution’, in History and Historians in Late Antiquity, edd. Croke, B. and Emmett, A. (Sydney and London 1983) 30–41.Google Scholar
Matthews, J. The Roman Empire of Ammianus (London and Baltimore 1989).Google Scholar
Mazzarino, S., Il pensiero storico classico (Bari 2 1966).Google Scholar
McDonald, A. H., ‘The Style of Livy’, JRS 47 (1957) 155–72.Google Scholar
McGushin, P., Sallust: The Histories, 2 vols. (Oxford 1992–4).Google Scholar
McKeon, R., ‘Literary Criticism and the Concept of Imitation in Antiquity’, in Critics and Criticism, ed. Crane, R. S. (Chicago 1952) 147-75; orig. in MPh 34 (1936-7) 1–35.Google Scholar
Meissner, B., ‘Πραγματικήή ίστορία: Polybius über den Zweck pragmatischer Geschichtsschreibung’, Saeculum 37 (1986) 313–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meissner, B. Historiker zwischen Polis und Koenigshof. Studien zur Stellung der Geschichtsschreiber in der griechischen Gesellschaft in spätklassischer und hellenistischer Zeit (Göttingen 1992).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meister, K., ‘Absurde Polemik bei Diodor’, Helikon 13-14 (1973–4) 454–9.Google Scholar
Meister, K. Historische Kritik bei Polybios (Wiesbaden 1975).Google Scholar
Meister, K. ‘The Role of Timaeus in Greek Historiography’, SCI 10 (1989/90) 55–65.Google Scholar
Meister, K. Die griechische Geschichtsschreibung (Berlin 1990).Google Scholar
Mendels, D., ‘Preliminary Thoughts on “Creative History” in the Hellenistic Near East in the 3rd and 2nd centuries bce’, SCI 10 (1989/90) 78–86.Google Scholar
Mendels, D. ‘The Polemical Character of Manetho’s Aegyptiaca’, in Purposes of History. Studies in Greek Historiography from the 4th to the 2nd centuries BC, edd. Verdin, H., Schepens, G., and deKeyser, E. (Studia Hellenistica 30; Leuven 1990) 91–110.Google Scholar
Mensching, E., Caesars Bellum Gallicum: Eine Einführung (Frankfurt/Main 1988).Google Scholar
Mette, H. J., ‘Die “Kleinen” griechischen Historiker heute’, Lustrum 21 (1978) 5-43; ‘Nachtrag’, ibid. 22 (1979-80) 107-8; ‘Ergänzungun ... bis zum Jahre 1984’, ibid. 27 (1985) 33–8.Google Scholar
Millar, F., A Study of Cassius Dio (Oxford 1964).Google Scholar
Millar, F. ‘P. Herennius Dexippus: The Greek World and the Third-Century Invasions’, JRS 59 (1969) 2–29.Google Scholar
Misch, G., Geschichte der Autobiographie 1.1 Das Antike (Bern3 1949).Google Scholar
Mohm, S., Untersuchungen zu den historiographischen Anschauungen des Polybios (diss. Saarbrücken 1977).Google Scholar
Moles, J. L., ‘The Interpretation of the “Second Preface” in Arrian’s Anabasis’ JHS 105 (1985) 162–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moles, J. L. ‘Truth and Untruth in Herodotus and Thucydides’, in Lies and Fiction in the Ancient World, edd. Gill, C. and Wiseman, T. P. (Exeter and Austin, Tex. 1993) 88–121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moles, J. L. ‘Livy’s Preface’, PCPhS n.s. 39 (1993) 141–68.Google Scholar
Momigliano, A., ‘Ancient History and the Antiquarian’, in Contributo alla Storia degli Studi Classici (Rome 1955) 67–106; in English in Studies in Historiography (London and New York 1966) 1-39; orig. in JWCI 13 (1950) 285–315.Google Scholar
Momigliano, A. ‘The Place of Herodotus in the History of Historiography’, in Secondo contributo alla Storia degli studi classici e del mondo antico (Rome 1960) 29–44; orig. in History 43 (1958) 1–13.Google Scholar
Momigliano, A. ‘Atene nel III Secolo a. C. e la Scoperta di Roma’, in Terzo contributo alla Storia degli studi classici e del mondo antico (Rome 1966) 1.23–53; in English in Essays 37–66, orig. in RSI 71 (1959) 529–56.Google Scholar
Momigliano, A. The Development of Greek Biography (Cambridge, Mass. 1971).Google Scholar
Momigliano, A. ‘Tradition and the Classical Historian’, in Quinto Contributo alla Storia degli studi classici e del mondo antico (Rome 1975) 13–31; also in Essays 161-77; orig. in H&T 11 (1972) 279–93.Google Scholar
Momigliano, A. ‘The Lonely Historian Ammianus Marcellinus’, in Sesto Contributo 11.143-57; orig. in ANSP ser. 3, 4 (1974) 1393–407.Google Scholar
Momigliano, A. Alien Wisdom. The Limits of Hellenization (Cambridge 1975).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Momigliano, A. Essays in Ancient and Modern Historiography (Oxford 1977).Google Scholar
Momigliano, A. ‘The Historians of the Classical World and their Audiences: Some Suggestions’, in Sesto Contributo 361-76; orig. in ANSP ser. 3, 8 (1978) 59–75.Google Scholar
Momigliano, A. Sesto contributo alla storia degli studi classici e del mondo antico (Rome 1980).Google Scholar
Momigliano, A. The Classical Foundations of Modern Historiography (Berkeley, Los Angeles, and London 1990).Google Scholar
Most, G. W., ‘The Stranger’s Stratagem: Self-disclosure and Self-sufficiency in Greek Culture’, JHS 109 (1989) 114–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Müller, D., ‘Herodot – Vater des Empirismus? Mensch und Erkenntnis im Denken Herodots’, in Gnomosyne: Festschrift für Walter Marg (Munich 1981) 299–318.Google Scholar
Münscher, K., Xenophon in der griechisch-römischen Literatur (Leipzig 1920).Google Scholar
Murray, O., ‘Hecataeus of Abdera and Pharaonic Kingship’, JEA 56 (1970) 141–71.Google Scholar
Murray, O. ‘Herodotus and Hellenistic Culture’, CQ n. s. 22 (1972) 200–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Murray, O. ‘Herodotus and Oral History’, in Achaemenid History. Proceedings of the Groningen Achaemenid History Workshop ii. The Greek Sources, ed. Sancisi-Weerdenburg, H. and Kuhrt, A. (Leiden 1987) 93–115.Google Scholar
Murray, P., ‘Poetic Inspiration in Early Greece’, JHS 101 (1981) 87–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mutschler, F.-H., Erzählstil und Propaganda in Caesars Kommentarien (Heidelberg 1975).Google Scholar
Nenci, G., ‘Il Motivo dell’ Autopsia nella Storiografia Greca’, SCO 3 (1955) 14–46.Google Scholar
Nickel, R., Xenophon (Darmstadt 1979).Google Scholar
Nicolai, R., La storiografia nell’educazione antica (Pisa 1992).Google Scholar
Nisbet, R. G. M. and Hubbard, M., A Commentary on Horace: Odes Book ii (Oxford 1978).Google Scholar
Nissen, H., Kritische Untersuchungen über die Quellen der vierten und fünften Dekade des Livius (Berlin 1863).Google Scholar
Nock, A. D., ‘Poseidonius’, in Essays on Religion and the Ancient World, ed. Stewart, Z. (Oxford 1972) 11.853-76; orig. in JRS 49 (1959) 1–15.Google Scholar
Norden, E., Agnostos Theos. Untersuchungen zur Formen-Geschichte religiöser Rede (Leipzig and Berlin 1913).Google Scholar
Norden, E. Die germanische Urgeschichte in Tacitus Germania (Leipzig and Berlin 3 1923).Google Scholar
Norden, E. Die antike Kunstprosa, 2 vols. (Berlin 5 1958).Google Scholar
Ogilvie, R. M., ‘Livy, Licinius Macer, and the Libri Lintel’, JRS 48 (1958) 40–6.Google Scholar
Ogilvie, R. M. A Commentary on Livy, Books i-v (Oxford 1965; repr. with addenda 1970).Google Scholar
Ong, W.J., Orality and Literacy (London 1972).Google Scholar
Paassen, Chr. van, The Classical Tradition of Geography (Groningen 1957).Google Scholar
Parke, H. W., ‘Citation and Recitation: A Convention in Early Greek Historians’, Hermathena 67 (1946) 80–91.Google Scholar
Parry, A., ‘Thucydides’ Use of Abstract Language’, in The Language of Achilles 177–84; orig. in ΥCS 45 (1970) 3–20.Google Scholar
Parry, A. ‘Thucydides’ Historical Perspective’, in The Language of Achilles 286–300; orig. in ΥCS 22 (1972) 47–61.Google Scholar
Parry, A. The Language of Achilles and other Papers (Oxford 1989).Google Scholar
Paul, G. M., ‘Urbs capta: Sketch of an Ancient Literary Motif’, Phoenix 36 (1982) 144–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Paul, G. M. A Historical Commentary on Sallust’s Bellum Jugurthinum (Leeds 1984).Google Scholar
Pauw, D. A., ‘Impersonal Expressions and Unidentified Spokesmen in Greek and Roman Historiography and Biography’, ActClass 23 (1980) 83–95.Google Scholar
Pearson, L., Early Ionian Historians (Oxford 1939).Google Scholar
Pearson, L. The Local Historians of Attica (Philadelphia 1942).Google Scholar
Pearson, L. The Lost Histories of Alexander the Great (New York and London 1960).Google Scholar
Pearson, L. The Greek Historians of the West. Timaeus and his Predecessors (Atlanta 1987).Google Scholar
Pédech, P., La methode historique de Polybe (Paris 1964).Google Scholar
Pédech, P. Historiens Compagnons d’ Alexandre: Callisthène – Onésicrite – Néarque – Ptolémée (Paris 1984).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pelling, C. B. R., ‘Truth and Fiction in Plutarch’s Lives’, in Antonine Literature, ed. Russell, D. A. (Oxford 1990) 19–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peter, H., Historicorum Romanorum Reliquiae (Stuttgart 2 1914; 1906).Google Scholar
Peter, H. Die geschichtliche Literatur über die römische Kaiserzeit bis Theodosius I, 2 vols. (Leipzig 1897).Google Scholar
Peter, H. Wahrheit und Kunst. Geschichtsschreibung und Plagiat im klassischen Altertum (Leipzig and Berlin 1911).Google Scholar
Petzold, K.-E., Studien zur Methode des Polybios und zu ihrer historischen Auswertung (Munich 1969).Google Scholar
Petzold, K.-E. ‘Zur Geschichte der römischen Annalistik’, in Livius: Aspekte seines Werkes, ed. Schuller, W. (Konstanz 1993) 151–88.Google Scholar
Pfister, F., ‘Isokrates und die spätere Gliederung der narratio’, Hermes 68 (1933) 457–60.Google Scholar
Piérart, M., ‘L’historien ancien face aux mythes et aux légendes’, LEC 51 (1983) 47–62, 105-15.Google Scholar
Potter, D. S., Prophecy and History in the Third Century: A Historical Commentary on the Thirteenth Sibylline Oracle (Oxford 1990).Google Scholar
Premerstein, A. von, ‘Commentarii’, RE iv.i (1900) 726–59.Google Scholar
Pritchett, W. K., Dionysius of Halicarnassus: On Thucydides (Berkeley 1975).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Raaflaub, K. A. and Toher, M., edd., Between Republic and Empire. Interpretations of Augustus and his Principate (Berkeley, Los Angeles, and London 1990).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Radermacher, L., ‘Studien zur Geschichte der griechischen Rhetorik’, RhM 52 (1897) 412–24.Google Scholar
Radermacher, L. ‘Kanon’, RE X. 2 (1919) 1873–8.Google Scholar
Rahn, P.J., ‘Xenophon’s Developing Historiography’, TAPA 102 (1971) 497–508.Google Scholar
Rajak, T., Josephus. The Historian and his Society (London 1983).Google Scholar
Ramage, E., ‘Juvenal and the Establishment: Denigration of Predecessors in the “Satires’”, ANRW II. 33. 1 (1989) 640–707.Google Scholar
Rambaud, M., L’Art de la deformation historique dans les Commentaires de César (Paris 2 1966).Google Scholar
Rasmussen, H., ed., Caesar (Wege der Forschung 43; Darmstadt 1967).Google Scholar
Rawson, E., ‘Prodigy Lists and the Use of the Annales Maximi’, in Roman Culture and Society 1–15; orig. in CQ n.s. 21 (1971) 158–69.Google Scholar
‘The First Latin Annalists’, in Roman Culture and Society 245-71; orig. in Latomus 35 (1976) 689–717.Google Scholar
Rawson, E. ‘L. Cornelius Sisenna and the Early First Century bc’, in Roman Culture and Society 363–88; orig. in CQ n.s. 29 (1979) 327–46.Google Scholar
Rawson, E. ‘History, Historiography, and Cicero’s Expositio Consiliorum Suorum’, in Roman Culture and Society 408–15; orig. in LCM 7.8 (1982) 121–4.Google Scholar
Rawson, E. Intellectual Life in the Late Roman Republic (London and Baltimore 1985).Google Scholar
Rawson, E. ‘The Antiquarian Tradition: Spoils and Representations of Foreign Armour’, in Roman Culture and Society 582–98; orig. in Staat und Staatlichkeit in der frühen römischen Republik, ed. Eder, W. (Stuttgart 1990) 157–73.Google Scholar
Rawson, E. Roman Culture and Society. Collected Papers (Oxford 1991).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reardon, B. P., Courants littéraires grecs des IIe et IIIe siècles après J.-C. (Paris 1971).Google Scholar
Renehan, R., ‘A Traditional Pattern of Imitation in Sallust and his Sources’, CPh 71 (1976) 97–105.Google Scholar
Rhodes, P. J., ‘The Atthidographers’ in Purposes of History. Studies in Greek Historiography from the 4th to the 2nd centuries BC, edd. Verdin, H., Schepens, G., and deKeyser, E. (Studia Hellenistica 30; Leuven 1990) 73–81.Google Scholar
Richter, W., Caesar als Darsteller seiner Taten: Eine Einführung (Heidelberg 1977).Google Scholar
Riemann, K.-A., Das herodoteische Geschichtswerk in der Antike (diss. Munich 1967).Google Scholar
Rinner, W., ‘Zur Darstellungsweise bei Xenophon, Anabasis iii 1-2’, Philologus 122 (1978)144–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robinson, P., ‘Why do we believe Thucydides? A Comment on W. R. Connor’s “Narrative Discourse in Thucydides’”, in The Greek Historians: Literature and History. Papers Presented to A. E. Raubitschek, ed. Jameson, M. H. (Saratoga, Calif. 1985) 19–23.Google Scholar
Roisman, J., ‘Ptolemy and His Rivals in his History of Alexander’, CQ 34 (1984) 373–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Romm, J., The Edges of the Earth in Ancients Thought: Geography, Exploration and Fiction (Princeton 1992).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosen, K., Studien zur Darstellungskunst und Glaubwürdigkeit des Ammianus Marcellinus (Bonn 1970).Google Scholar
Rosen, K. ‘Politische Ziele in der frühen hellenistischen Geschichtsschreibung’, Hermes 107 (1979) 460–77.Google Scholar
Rubin, Z., Civil War Propaganda and Historiography (Brussels 1980).Google Scholar
Ruch, M., ‘Tite-Live, Histoire Romaine. Points de vue sur la Préface’, Didactica Classica Gandensia 7 (1967) 74–80.Google Scholar
Rüpke, J., ‘Wer las Caesars bella als commentarii?’ Gymnasium 99 (1992) 201–26.Google Scholar
Russell, D. A., Longinus: On the Sublime (Oxford 1964).Google Scholar
Russell, D. A. ‘De Imitatione’, in Creative Imitation and Latin Literature, edd. West, D. and Woodman, A.J. (Cambridge 1979) 1–16.Google Scholar
Russell, D. A. Criticism in Antiquity (London 1981).Google Scholar
Russell, D. A. Greek Declamation (Cambridge 1983).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Russell, D. A. ‘Self-disclosure in Plutarch and Horace’, in Philosophia kai Eusebeia. Festschrift ... A. Dihle, edd. Most, G., Petersmann, H., and Ritter, A. (Göttingen 1993) 426–37.Google Scholar
Russell, D. A. and Winterbottom, M., Ancient Literary Criticism (Oxford 1972).Google Scholar
Ryberg, I. S., ‘Tacitus’ art of innuendo’, TAPA 73 (1942) 383–404.Google Scholar
Sabbah, G., La Méthode d’Ammien Marcellin. Recherches sur la Construction du discours historique dans les Res Gestae (Paris 1978).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sacks, K., Polybius on the Writing of History (Berkeley 1981).Google Scholar
Sacks, K. ‘Historiography in the Rhetorical Works of Dionysius of Halicarnassus’, Athenaeum 61 (1983) 65–87.Google Scholar
Sacks, K. Diodorus Siculus and the First Century bc (Princeton 1990).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sallmann, K., ‘Der Traum des Historikers: Zu den “Bella Germaniae” des Plinius und zur julisch-claudischen Geschichtsschreibung’, ANRW II. 32.1 (1984) 578–601.Google Scholar
Scanlon, L., Narrative, Authority, and Power: The Medieval Exemplum and the Chaucerian Tradition (Cambridge 1994).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schanz, M., Hosius, C., and Krüger, G., Geschichte der römischen Literatur, 4 vols. (Munich 1914–35).Google Scholar
Scheller, P., De hellenistica historiae conscribendae arte (diss. Leipzig 1911).Google Scholar
Schepens, G., ‘Ephore sur la Valeur de l’Autopsie (FGrHist 70 f 110 = Polybe xii 27.7)’, Anc. Soc. 1 (1970) 163–82.Google Scholar
Schepens, G. ‘Arrian’s View of his Task as Alexander-Historian’, Anc. Soc. 2 (1971) 254–68.Google Scholar
Schepens, G. ‘The Bipartite and Tripartite Divisions of History in Polybius (xii 25e & 27)’, Anc. Soc. 5 (1974) 277–87.Google Scholar
Schepens, G. ‘Eμϕασιϛ und ένάργεια in Polybios’ Geschichtstheorie’, RSA 5 (1975) 185–200.Google Scholar
Schepens, G. ‘Some Aspects of Source Theory in Greek Historiography’, Anc. Soc. 6 (1975) 257–74.Google Scholar
Schepens, G. ‘Historiographical Problems in Ephorus’ in Historiographia Antiqua. Commentationes.. .in honorem W. Peremans (Leuven 1977) 95–118.Google Scholar
Schepens, G. L’ Autopsie’ dans la Methode des historiens grecs du Ve siècle avant J.-C. (Brussels 1980).Google Scholar
Schepens, G. ‘Les rois ptolémaïque et l’historiographie. Réflexions sur la transformation de l’histoire politique’, in Egypt and the Hellenistic World, edd. Van ’t Dack, E., Van Dessel, P., and Van Gucht, W. (Studia Hellenistica 27; Leuven 1983) 351–68.Google Scholar
Schepens, G. ‘Polemic and Methodology in Polybius’ Book xii’, in Purposes of History. Studies in Greek Historiography from the 4th to the 2nd centuries BC, edd. Verdin, H., Schepens, G., and E.deKeyser, (Studia Hellenistica 30; Leuven 1990) 39–61.Google Scholar
Schmalzriedt, E., ΠEPI ϕYΣIOΣ. Zur Frühgeschichte der Buchtitel (Munich 1970).Google Scholar
Schreckenberg, H., Die Flavius-Josephus Tradition in Antike und Mittelalter (Leiden 1972).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schröder, W. A., M. Porcius Cato. Das Erste Buch der Origines (Meisenheim am Glan 1971).Google Scholar
Schultze, C., ‘Dionysius of Halicarnassus and his Audience’, in Past Perspectives. Studies in Greek and Roman Historical Writing, edd. Moxon, I. S.,Smart, J. D., and Woodman, A.J. (Cambridge 1986) 121–41.Google Scholar
Schwartz, E., ‘Appianus’, in Griechische Geschichtschreiber 361–93; orig, in RE II (1985) 216–37.Google Scholar
Schwartz, E., ‘Cassius Dio’, in Griechische Geschichtschreiber 394-450; orig, in RE III (1899) 1684–1722.Google Scholar
Schwartz, E., ‘Diodorus’ in Griechische Geschichtschreiber 35-97; orig, in RE V.1 (1903) 663–704.Google Scholar
Schwartz, E., ‘Dionysius von Halicarnassus’, in Griechische Geschichtschreiber 319-60; orig, in REV.1 (1903) 934–61.Google Scholar
Schwartz, E., Funf Vorträge über den griechischen Roman (Berlin 2 1943).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schwartz, E., Griechische Geschichtschreiber (Leipzig 1959).Google Scholar
Scobie, A., ‘Storytellers, Storytelling and the Novel in Greco-Roman Antiquity’, RhM 122 (1979) 229–59.Google Scholar
Seel, O., Die Praefatio des Pompeius Trogus, Erlangen Forschungen 3 (Erlangen 1955).Google Scholar
Shatzman, I., ‘Tacitean rumours’,Latomus 33 (1974) 549–78.Google Scholar
Sherwin-White, S. and Kuhrt, A., edd., From Samarkhand to Sardis: New Perspectives on the Seleucid Empire (London and Berkeley 1983).Google Scholar
Shrimpton, G. S., Theopompus the Historian (Montreal 1991).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shutt, R. J. H., Studies in Josephus (London 1961).Google Scholar
Skutsch, O., The Annals of Quintus Ennius (Oxford 1985).Google Scholar
Slings, S. R., ‘Poet’s Call and Poet’s Status in Archaic Greece and Other Oral Cultures’, LF 112 (1989) 72–80.Google Scholar
Slings, S. R., ‘The I in Personal Archaic Lyric: an Introduction’, in id., ed., The Poet’s I in Archaic Greek Lyric (Amsterdam 1990) 1–30.Google Scholar
Smart, J. D., ‘Thucydides and Hellanicus’ in Past Perspectives. Studies in Greek and Roman Historical Writing, edd. Moxon, I. S., Smart, J. D., and Woodman, A. J. (Cambridge 1986) 19–35.Google Scholar
Snell, B., Die Entdeckung des Geistes (Göttingen 4 1975).Google Scholar
Sordi, M., ‘Timagene di Alessandria: uno storico ellenocentrico e filobarbaro’, ANRW II. 30.1 (1982) 775–97.Google Scholar
Spawforth, A., ‘Symbol of Unity? The Persian-Wars Tradition in the Roman Empire’, in Greek Historiography, ed. Hornblower, S. (Oxford 1994) 233–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Speyer, W., Die literarische Fälschung im heidnischen und christlichen Altertum (Munich 1971).Google Scholar
Stadter, P., ‘Flavius Arrianus: The New Xenophon’, GRBS 8 (1967) 155–61.Google Scholar
Stadter, P., Arrian of Nicomedia (Chapel Hill 1980).Google Scholar
Stadter, P., ‘Arrian’s Extended Preface’, ICS 6 (1981) 157–71.Google Scholar
Starr, R. J., ‘The Scope and Genre of Velleius’ History’, CQ n.s. 31 (1981) 162–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Starr, R. J., ‘The Circulation of Literary Texts in the Ancient World’, CQ n. s. 37 (1987) 213–23.Google Scholar
Steele, R. B., ‘The Historical Attitude of Liviy’, AJPh 25 (1904) 15–44.Google Scholar
Stein, F.-J .,Dexippus et Herodianus quatenus Thucydidem secuti sint (diss. Bonn 1957).Google Scholar
Steinmetz, P., Untersuchungen zur römischen Literatur des zweiten Jahrhunderts nach Christi Geburt (Wiesbaden 1982).Google Scholar
Stephens, S. A., ‘Who Read Ancient Novels?’, in The Search for the Ancient Novel, ed.Tatum, J. (Baltimore and London 1994) 405–18.Google Scholar
Stevenson, R. B., ‘Lies and Inventions in Deinon’s Persica’, in Achaemenid History. Proceedings of the Groningen Achaemenid History Workshop 11. The Greek Soìirces, edd. Sancisi-Weerdenburg, H. and Kuhrt, A. (Leiden 1987) 27–35.Google Scholar
Stiewe, K. and Holzberg, N., edd., Polybios (Darmstadt 1982).Google Scholar
Strasburger, H., Homer und die Geschichtsschreibung, in Studien zur alten Geschichte, 2 vols. (Hildesheim and New York 1982) 11.1057–97; orig. in SHAW 1 (Heidelberg 1972).Google Scholar
Strebel, H. G., Wertung und Wirkung des thukydideischen Geschichtsiuerkes in der griechisch-römischen Literatur (diss. Munich 1935).Google Scholar
Strobel, K., ‘Zeitgeschichte unter den Antoninen: Die Historiker des Partherkrieges des Lucius Verus’, ANRW II.34.2 (1994) 1316–60.Google Scholar
Suerbaum, W., Untersuchungen zur Selbstdarstellung älterer römischer Dichter (Hildesheim 1968).Google Scholar
Suerbaum, W., ‘Der Historiker und die Freiheit des Wortes: Die Rede des Cremutius Cordus bei Tacitus, Ann. 4, 34/35’ in Politik und Literarische Kunst im Werk des Tacitus, ed. Radke, G. (Stuttgart 1971) 61–99.Google Scholar
Syme, R., ‘The Senator as Historian’ in Ten Studies in Tacitus 1-10; orig, in Histoire et Historiens dans l’ Antiquité Classique (Entretiens Hardt 4; Geneva 1958) 187–201.Google Scholar
Syme, R., ‘Obituaries in Tacitus’, in Ten Studies in Tacitus 79-90; orig. in AJPh 79 (1958) 18–31.Google Scholar
Syme, R., Tacitus, 2 vols. (Oxford 1958).Google Scholar
Syme, R., ‘Livy and Augustus’ in Roman Papers, ed. Badian, E. (Oxford 1979) 1.400-54; orig. in HSCP64 (1959) 27–87.Google Scholar
Syme, R., Sallust (Berkeley 1964).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Syme, R., ‘The Historian Servilius Nonianus’ in Ten Studies in Tacitus 91-109; orig. in Hermes 92 (1964) 408–24.Google Scholar
Syme, R., Ten Studies in Tacitus (Oxford 1970).Google Scholar
Syme, R., Emperors and Biography. Studies in the Historia Augusta (Oxford 1971).Google Scholar
Syme, R., ‘How Tacitus Wrote Annals 1-111’, in Roman Papers, ed. Birley, A. R. (Oxford 1984) 111.1014–42; orig. in Historiographa Antiqua. Commentationes … in honorem W. Peremans (Leuven 1977) 231–63.Google Scholar
Thomas, R., Oral Tradition and Written Record in Classical Athens (Cambridge 1989).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thomas, R., Literacy and Orality in Ancient Greece (Cambridge 1992).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thomas, R., ‘Performance and Written Publication in Herodotus and the Sophistic Generation’, in Vermittlung und Tradierung von Wissen in der griechischen Kultur, edd. Kullmann, W. and Althoff, J. (Tübingen 1993) 225–44.Google Scholar
Thompson, W. E., ‘Fragments of the Preserved Historians - Especially Polybius’, in The Greek Historians: Literature and History. Papers Presented to A. E. Raubitschek, ed. Jameson, M. H. (Saratoga, Calif. 1985) 119–39.Google Scholar
Timpe, D., ‘Le Origini di Catone e la storiografia latina’, AAPat 83 (1970-1) 1–33.Google Scholar
Timpe, D., ‘Fabius Pictor und die Anfänge der römischen Geschichtsschreibung’, ANRW I.2(1972) 928–69.Google Scholar
Timpe, D., ‘Erwägungen zur jüngeren Annalistik’,A&J 25 (1979) 97–119.Google Scholar
Timpe, D., ‘Mündlichkeit und Schriftlichkeit als Basis der frührömischen Überlieferung’, in Vergangenheit in mündlicher Überlieferung, edd. Ungern-Sternberg, J. von and Reinau, H. (Stuttgart 1988) 266–86.Google Scholar
Todd, S. C., ‘The Purpose of Evidence in Athenian Courts’, in Nomos: Essays in Athenian Law, Politics and Society, edd. Millett, P., Cartledge, P., and Todd, S. (Cambridge 1990) 19–39.Google Scholar
Toher, M., ‘On the Use of Nicolaus’ Historical Fragments’, CA 8 (1989) 159-72. ‘Augustus and the Evolution of Roman Historiography’, in Between Republic and Empire, edd. Raaflaub, K. and Toher, M. (Berkeley 1990) 139–54.Google Scholar
Toye, D. L., ‘Dionysius of Halicarnassus on the First Greek Historians’, AJPh 116 (1995) 279–302.Google Scholar
Trüdinger, K., Studien zur griechisch-römischen Ethnographie (Basel 1918).Google Scholar
Underhill, G. E., A Commentary on the Hellenica of Xenophon (Oxford 1900; repr. with Oxford text of E. C. Marchant, 1906).Google Scholar
Ungern-Sternberg, J. von, ‘Überlegungen zur frühen römischen Überlieferung’, in Vergangenheit in mündlicher Überlieferung, edd. Ungern-Sternberg, J. von and Reinau, H. (Stuttgart 1988) 237–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Usher, S., ‘The Style of Dionysius of Halicarnassus in the “Antiquitates Romanae”’, ANRWII.30.1 (1982) 817–38.Google Scholar
Van ’t Dack, E., Van Dessel, P. and Van Gucht, W., edd. Egypt and the Hellenistic World. Proceedings of the International Colloquium Leuven, 24-26 May 1982 (Studia Hellenistica 27; Leuven 1983).Google Scholar
Vercruysse, M., ‘A la recherche du mensonge et de la vérité: La fonction des passages méthodologiques chez Polybe’, in Purposes of History. Studies in Greek Historiography from the 4th to the 2nd centuries BC, edd. Verdin, H., Schepens, G., and deKeyser, E. (Studia Hellenistica 30, Leuven 1990) 17–38.Google Scholar
Verdin, H., ‘L’importance des recherches sur la méthode critique des historiens grecs et latins’, Stud. Hell. 16 (1968) 289–308.Google Scholar
Verdin, H., ‘Notes sur l’attitude des historiens grecs à l’égard de la tradition locale’, Anc. Soc. 1 (1970) 183–200.Google Scholar
Verdin, H., De historisch-kritische Methods van Herodotus (Brussels 1971).Google Scholar
Verdin, H., ‘La fonction de l’histoire selon Denys d’Halicarnasse’, Anc. Soc. 5 (1974) 289–307.Google Scholar
Verdin, H., ‘Les remarques critiques d’Hérodote et de Thucydide sur la poésie en tant que source historique’, in Historigraphia Antiqua. Commentationes ... in honorem W. Peremans (Leuven 1977) 53–76.Google Scholar
Verdin, H., ‘Agatharchide et la tradition du discours politique dans l’historiographie grecque’, in Egypt and the Hellenistic World, edd. Van ’t Dack, E., Van Dessel, P., and Van Gucht, W. (Studia Hellenistica 27; Leuven 1983) 407–20.Google Scholar
Verdin, H., ‘Agatharchide de Cnide et les Fictions des Poètes’, in Purposes of History. Studies in Greek Historiography from the 4th to the 2nd centuries BC, edd. Verdin, H., Schepens, G., and deKeyser, E. (Studia Hellenistica 30; Leuven 1990) 1–15.Google Scholar
Verdin, H., Schepens, G. and deKeyser, E., edd., Purposes of History. Studies in Greek Historiography from the 4th to the 2nd centuries BC (Studia Hellenistica 30; Leuven 1990).Google Scholar
Veyne, P.,Did the Greeks Believe in their Myths? (Chicago 1988).Google Scholar
Volkmann, R., Die Rhetorik der Griechen und Römer in systematischer Übersicht (Leipzig 21885; repr. Hildesheim 1963).Google Scholar
Vretska, K., Sallust. De Catilinae Coniuratione, 2 vols. (Heidelberg 1976).Google Scholar
Walbank, F. W., ‘Polybius, Philinus and the First Punic War’, in Selected Papers 77-98; orig, in CQ39 (1945) 1–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walbank, F. W., ‘Tragic History: A Reconsideration’,BICS 2 (1955) 4–14.Google Scholar
Walbank, F. W., A Historical Commentary on Polybius,3 vols. (Oxford 1957-78).Google Scholar
Walbank, F. W., ‘History and Tragedy’, in Selected Papers 224-41; orig. in Historia 9 (1960) 216–34.Google Scholar
Walbank, F. W., ‘Polemic in Polybius’, in Selected Papers 262-79; orig. inJRS 52 (1962) 1–12.Google Scholar
Walbank, F. W., ‘The Historians of Greek Sicily’, Kokalos 14-15 (1968-9) 476–98.Google Scholar
Walbank, F. W., Polybius (Berkeley and London 1972).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walbank, F. W., ‘Polybius between Greece and Rome’, in Selected Papers 280-97; orig. in Polybe (Entretiens Hardt 20; Geneva 1974) 1–31.Google Scholar
Walbank, F. W., ‘Polybius’ Last Ten Books’, in Selected Papers 325-43; orig. in Historiographia Antiqua. Commentationes in honorem ... W. Peremans (Leuven 1977) 139–62.Google Scholar
Walbank, F. W., Selected Papers. Studies in Greek and Roman History and Historiography (Cambridge 1985).Google Scholar
Walbank, F. W., ‘Timaeus’ View of the Past’, SCI 10 (1989/90) 41–54.Google Scholar
Walbank, F. W., ‘Profit or Amusement: Some Thoughts on the Motives of Hellenistic Historians’, in Purposes of History. Studies in Greek Historiography from the 4th to the 2nd centuries BC, edd. Verdin, H., Schepens, G., and deKeyser, E. (Studia Hellenistica 30; Leuven 1990) 253–66.Google Scholar
Walcot, P., Envy and the Greeks (Warminster 1978).Google Scholar
Walker, B., The Annals of Tacitus: A Study in the Writing of History (Manchester 1952).Google Scholar
Walsh, P. G., Livy: His Historical Aims and Methods (Cambridge 1961).Google Scholar
Wardman, A., ‘Myth in Greek Historiography’, Historia 9 (1960) 403–13.Google Scholar
Weinstock, S.,Divus Julius (Oxford 1971).Google Scholar
Wellesley, K., Cornelius Tacitus: The Histories Book Ill (Sydney 1972).Google Scholar
West, D. and Woodman, A. J., edd., Creative Imitation and Latin Literature (Cambridge 1979).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
West, M. L., Hesiod: Theogony (Oxford 1966).Google Scholar
West, M. Studies in Greek Elegy and Iambus (Berlin and New York 1971).Google Scholar
West, M. Hesiod: Works and Days (Oxford 1979).Google Scholar
West, S., ‘Herodotus’ Portrait of Hecataeus’, JHS 111 (1991) 144–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Westlake, H. D., ‘Thucydides and the Fall of Amphipolis’, in Essays on the Greek Historians and Greek History (Manchester 1969) 123-37; orig. in Hermes 90 (1962) 276–87.Google Scholar
Weyman, C., ‘Sine ira et studio’, ALLG 15 (1908) 278–9.Google Scholar
Wheeldon, M. J., “‘True Stories”: the Reception of Historiography in Antiquity’, in History as Text, ed. Cameron, A. (London and Chapel Hill 1989)33–63.Google Scholar
White, H., ‘The Burden of History’, in Tropics of Discourse. Essays in Cultural Criticism (Baltimore and London 1978) 27–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
White, H., ‘The Question of Narrative in Contemporary Historical Theory’, in The Content of the Form. Narrative Discourse and Historical Representation (Baltimore and London 1987) 26–57.Google Scholar
Whitehead, D.,‘Tacitus and the Loaded Alternative’, Latomus 38 (1979) 474–95.Google Scholar
Whittaker, C. R. Herodian 2 vols. (Cambridge, Mass, and London, 1969,1970).Google Scholar
Wilkes, J., ‘Julio-Claudian Historians’, CW 65 (1971/2) 177–203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Will, W., ‘Die griechische Geschichtsschreiber des 4. Jahrhunderts: Eine Zusammenfassung’, in Geschichtsbild und Geschichtsdenken im Altertum, ed.Alonso-Núñez, J. M. (Darmstadt 1991) 113–35.Google Scholar
Wiseman, T. P., ‘Legendary Genealogies in late-Republican Rome’, in Roman Studies 207-18; orig, in G&R 21 (1974) 153–64.Google Scholar
Wiseman, T. P., Clio’s Cosmetics: Three Studies in Greco-Roman Literature (Leicester 1969). ‘Practice and Theory in Roman Historiography’, in Roman Studies 244-61; orig. in History 66 (1981) 375–93.Google Scholar
Wiseman, T. P., ‘Lying Historians: Seven Types of Mendacity’ in Lies and Fiction in the Ancient World, edd. Gill, C. and Wiseman, T. P. (Exeter and Austin, Tex. 1993) 122–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wiseman, T. P., ‘Monuments and the Roman Annalists’, in Historiography and Imagination 37-48; originally in Past Perspectives. Studies in Greek and Roman Historical Writing, edd. Moxon, I. S., Smart, J. D., and Woodman, A. J. (Cambridge 1986) 87–100.Google Scholar
Wiseman, T. P., ‘The Origins of Roman Historiography’, in Historiography and Imagination 1–22.Google Scholar
Wiseman, T. P., Roman Studies. Literary and Historical (Liverpool 1987).Google Scholar
Wiseman, T. P., Historiography and Imagination. Eight Essays on Roman Culture (Exeter 1994).Google Scholar
Woodman, A.J., ‘Sallustian Influence in Velleius Paterculus’, in Hommages à M. Renard (Brussels 1968) 1.785–99.Google Scholar
Woodman, A.J., ‘Questions of Date, Genre and Style in Velleius: Some Literary Answers’, CQ n. s.25 (1975) 272–306.Google Scholar
Woodman, A.J., Velleius Paterculus. The Tiberian Narrative (2.94-131) (Cambridge 1977).Google Scholar
Woodman, A.J., ‘Self-Imitation and the Substance of History’, in Creative Imitation and Latin Literature, edd. West, D. and Woodman, A. J. (Cambridge 1979) 143–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Woodman, A.J., Velleius Paterculus. The Caesarian and Augustan Narrative (2.41-93) (Cambridge 1983).Google Scholar
Woodman, A.J., ‘Reading the Ancient Historians’, Omnibus 5 (1983) 24–7.Google Scholar
Woodman, A.J., Rhetoric in Classical Historiography (London, Sydney, and Portland 1988).Google Scholar
Woodman, A.J., ‘Contemporary History in the Classical World’, in Contemporary History:Google Scholar
Woodman, A.J., Practice and Method, ed. Seldon, A. (Oxford 1988) 149–64.Google Scholar
Woodman, A.J., ‘The Preface to Tacitus’ Annals: More Sallust?’, CQ n.s. 42 (1992) 567–8.Google Scholar
Woodman, A.J., ‘Praecipuum munus annalium: The Construction, Convention and Context of Tacitus, Annals 3.65.1’, MH 52 (1995) 111–26.Google Scholar
Wunderer, C., Polybios-Forschungen. Beiträge zur Sprach- und Kultur- Geschichte II. Zitate und geflügelte Worte bei Polybios-III. Gleichnisse und Metaphern bei Polybios (Leipzig 1901,1909; repr. Darmstadt 1969).Google Scholar
Zegers, N., Wesen und Ursprung der tragischen Geschichtsschreibung (diss. Cologne 1959).Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • Bibliography
  • John Marincola, Florida State University
  • Foreword by Christopher Pelling, University of Oxford
  • Book: Authority and Tradition in Ancient Historiography
  • Online publication: 31 January 2025
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009478373.012
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • Bibliography
  • John Marincola, Florida State University
  • Foreword by Christopher Pelling, University of Oxford
  • Book: Authority and Tradition in Ancient Historiography
  • Online publication: 31 January 2025
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009478373.012
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • Bibliography
  • John Marincola, Florida State University
  • Foreword by Christopher Pelling, University of Oxford
  • Book: Authority and Tradition in Ancient Historiography
  • Online publication: 31 January 2025
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009478373.012
Available formats
×