We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
To save content items to your account,
please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies.
If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account.
Find out more about saving content to .
To save content items to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org
is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings
on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part
of your Kindle email address below.
Find out more about saving to your Kindle.
Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations.
‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi.
‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
This chapter reviews vectors and matrices, and basic properties like shape, orthogonality, determinant, eigenvalues, and trace. It also reviews operations like multiplication and transpose. These operations are used throughout the book and are pervasive in the literature. In short, arranging data into vectors and matrices allows one to apply powerful data analysis techniques over a wide spectrum of applications. Throughout, this chapter (and book) illustrates how the ideas are implemented in practice in Julia.
We improve and expand in two directions the theory of norms on complex matrices induced by random vectors. We first provide a simple proof of the classification of weakly unitarily invariant norms on the Hermitian matrices. We use this to extend the main theorem in Chávez, Garcia, and Hurley (2023, Canadian Mathematical Bulletin 66, 808–826) from exponent $d\geq 2$ to $d \geq 1$. Our proofs are much simpler than the originals: they do not require Lewis’ framework for group invariance in convex matrix analysis. This clarification puts the entire theory on simpler foundations while extending its range of applicability.
Chapter 10: In this chapter, we identify the eigenvalues of a square complex matrix as the zeros of its characteristic polynomial. We show that an n × n complex matrix is diagonalizable (similar to a diagonal matrix) if and only if it has n linearly independent eigenvectors. If A is a diagonalizable matrix and if f is a complex-valued function on the spectrum of A, we discuss a way to define f(A) that has many desirable properties.
This chapter discusses the kind, episodic memory, which has recently garnered a great deal of attention from philosophers. In light of current empirical work, it has become increasingly challenging to accept an influential and intuitively plausible philosophical account of memory, namely the “causal theory of memory.” It is unlikely that each episodic memory can be associated with a trace or “engram” that can be shown to be linked by an uninterrupted causal chain to an episode in the thinker’s past. Some philosophers and psychologists have responded by effectively abandoning the category of episodic memory and assimilating memory to imagination or hypothetical thinking. But I argue that there is still room for a distinct cognitive kind, episodic memory, a cognitive capacity whose function it is to generate representational states that are connected to past episodes in the experience of the thinker, which bear traces of these episodes that are individuated not at the neural level but at the “computational level.”
We introduce a family of norms on the $n \times n$ complex matrices. These norms arise from a probabilistic framework, and their construction and validation involve probability theory, partition combinatorics, and trace polynomials in noncommuting variables. As a consequence, we obtain a generalization of Hunter’s positivity theorem for the complete homogeneous symmetric polynomials.
By analogy with the trace of an algebraic integer
$\alpha $
with conjugates
$\alpha _1=\alpha , \ldots , \alpha _d$
, we define the G-measure
$ {\mathrm {G}} (\alpha )= \sum _{i=1}^d ( |\alpha _i| + 1/ | \alpha _i | )$
and the absolute
${\mathrm G}$
-measure
${\mathrm {g}}(\alpha )={\mathrm {G}}(\alpha )/d$
. We establish an analogue of the Schur–Siegel–Smyth trace problem for totally positive algebraic integers. Then we consider the case where
$\alpha $
has all its conjugates in a sector
$| \arg z | \leq \theta $
,
$0 < \theta < 90^{\circ }$
. We compute the greatest lower bound
$c(\theta )$
of the absolute G-measure of
$\alpha $
, for
$\alpha $
belonging to
$11$
consecutive subintervals of
$]0, 90 [$
. This phenomenon appears here for the first time, conforming to a conjecture of Rhin and Smyth on the nature of the function
$c(\theta )$
. All computations are done by the method of explicit auxiliary functions.
In algebraic number theory the determinant plays a bigger role than in a typical undergraduate linear algebra course. In particular, its relationship to trace, norm, and characteristic polynomial is important. For this reason, we develop determinant theory from scratch in this chapter, using an axiomatic characterization of determinant due to Artin. Among other things, this quickly gives basis-independence of the characteristic polynomial, trace, and norm. With these foundations we can introduce the discriminant, which tests whether an n-tuple of vectors form a basis, and paves the way for integral bases studied in the next chapter.
In Chapter 2, we explain some of the basics of algebraic number theory, which we will need in Chapter 3 to introduce the theory of heights and to give a proof of the Mordell-Weil theorem. We begin by introducing the trace and the norm of an element of a finite extention field. We show the existence of an integral basis for a ring of integers and define the discriminant of a number field. After showing the existence of a prime factorization of a fractional ideal of a ring of integers (Theorems 2.5 and 2.6), we prove Minkowski's convex body theorem (Theorem 2.9) and Minkowski's discriminant theorem (Theorem 2.13). Finally, we introduce the notions of the ramification index and the residue degree at a prime ideal of an extension field. We define the difference of a number field, and explain several results relating the discriminant, the difference, and the ramifications of prime ideals (Lemma 2.17 and Theorem 2.18).
For a not-necessarily commutative ring $R$ we define an abelian group $W(R;M)$ of Witt vectors with coefficients in an $R$-bimodule $M$. These groups generalize the usual big Witt vectors of commutative rings and we prove that they have analogous formal properties and structure. One main result is that $W(R) := W(R;R)$ is Morita invariant in $R$. For an $R$-linear endomorphism $f$ of a finitely generated projective $R$-module we define a characteristic element $\chi _f \in W(R)$. This element is a non-commutative analogue of the classical characteristic polynomial and we show that it has similar properties. The assignment $f \mapsto \chi _f$ induces an isomorphism between a suitable completion of cyclic $K$-theory $K_0^{\mathrm {cyc}}(R)$ and $W(R)$.
This chapter analyzes the relation between postmodernism and posthumanism. While postmodernism, as an aesthetic and philosophical practice, has lost some of its relevance in the academy, several of its underlying gestures, the primary being the interrogation of the humanist model of subjectivity, live on in various versions of posthumanism. The central concern here, first, will be to examine Derrida’s concept of the trace (in his essay “Differance”); the chapter then moves on to suggest that Derrida’s quintessentially postmodern reading of the subject— differentiated, displaced, and other to itself—finds new expression in various canonical versions of posthumanism (in Hayles, Haraway, and Braidotti). Ultimately, the chapter examines how Derrida’s model of the subject persists as a kind of haunting in posthumanist thought, how postmodernism operates as a prefiguring trace of posthumanism.
Let ${\mathcal{A}}$ be a semisimple Banach algebra with minimal left ideals and $\text{soc}({\mathcal{A}})$ be the socle of ${\mathcal{A}}$. We prove that if $\text{soc}({\mathcal{A}})$ is an essential ideal of ${\mathcal{A}}$, then every 2-local derivation on ${\mathcal{A}}$ is a derivation. As applications of this result, we can easily show that every 2-local derivation on some algebras, such as semisimple modular annihilator Banach algebras, strongly double triangle subspace lattice algebras and ${\mathcal{J}}$-subspace lattice algebras, is a derivation.
This paper deals with the following problem. Given a finite extension of fields $\mathbb{L}/\mathbb{K}$ and denoting the trace map from $\mathbb{L}$ to $\mathbb{K}$ by $\text{Tr}$, for which elements $z$ in $\mathbb{L}$, and $a$, $b$ in $\mathbb{K}$, is it possible to write $z$ as a product $xy$, where $x,y\in \mathbb{L}$ with $\text{Tr}(x)=a,\text{Tr}(y)=b$? We solve most of these problems for finite fields, with a complete solution when the degree of the extension is at least 5. We also have results for arbitrary fields and extensions of degrees 2, 3 or 4. We then apply our results to the study of perfect nonlinear functions, semifields, irreducible polynomials with prescribed coefficients, and a problem from finite geometry concerning the existence of certain disjoint linear sets.
This chapter is a preparation for the formulation of the Connes embedding problem. We introduce tracial probability spaces (that is von Neumann algebras equipped with faithful, normaland normalized traces) and the so-called non-commutative L1 and L2 spaces associated to them.
The main examples that we describe are derived either from discrete groups or from semi-circular and circular systems, which are the analogues of Gaussian random variables in free probability. Wethen define ultraproducts of tracial probability spaces. This leads us to an important criterion for factorization of linear maps through B(H). We include a characterization of injectivity in terms of hypertraces, and we introduce the factorization property for discrete groups.
This paper concerns HH-relations in the lattices P(M) of all projections of W*-algebras M. If M is a finite algebra, all these relations are generated by trails in P(M). If M is an infinite countably decomposable factor, they are either generated by trails or associated with them.
Given an open set with finite perimeter $\Omega \subset {\open R}^n$, we consider the space $LD_\gamma ^{p}(\Omega )$, $1\les p<\infty $, of functions with pth-integrable deformation tensor on Ω and with pth-integrable trace value on the essential boundary of Ω. We establish the continuous embedding $LD_\gamma ^{p}(\Omega )\subset L^{pN/(N-1)}(\Omega )$. The space $LD_\gamma ^{p}(\Omega )$ and this embedding arise naturally in studying the motion of rigid bodies in a viscous, incompressible fluid.
In this paper we define B-Fredholm elements in a Banach algebra A modulo an ideal J of A. When a trace function is given on the ideal J, it generates an index for B-Fredholm elements. In the case of a B-Fredholm operator T acting on a Banach space, we prove that its usual index ind(T) is equal to the trace of the commutator [T, T0], where T0 is a Drazin inverse of T modulo the ideal of finite rank operators, extending Fedosov's trace formula for Fredholm operators (see Böttcher and Silbermann [Analysis of Toeplitz operators, 2nd edn (Springer, 2006)]. In the case of a primitive Banach algebra, we prove a punctured neighbourhood theorem for the index.
The trace (or zeroth Hochschild homology) of Khovanov’s Heisenberg category is identified with a quotient of the algebra $W_{1+\infty }$. This induces an action of $W_{1+\infty }$ on the center of the categorified Fock space representation, which can be identified with the action of $W_{1+\infty }$ on symmetric functions.
In this short note we present a common characterisation of the logarithmic function and the subspace of all trace zero elements in finite von Neumann factors.
Motivated by traces of matrices and Euler characteristics of topological spaces, we expect abstract traces in a symmetric monoidal category to be “additive”. When the category is “stable” in some sense, additivity along cofiber sequences is a question about the interaction of stability and the monoidal structure.
May proved such an additivity theorem when the stable structure is a triangulation, based on new axioms for monoidal triangulated categories. in this paper we use stable derivators instead, which are a different model for “stable homotopy theories”. We define and study monoidal structures on derivators, providing a context to describe the interplay between stability and monoidal structure using only ordinary category theory and universal properties. We can then perform May's proof of the additivity of traces in a closed monoidal stable derivator without needing extra axioms, as all the needed compatibility is automatic.
A semigroup $S$ is called idempotent-surjective (respectively, regular-surjective) if whenever $\rho $ is a congruence on $S$ and $a\rho $ is idempotent (respectively, regular) in $S/ \rho $, then there is $e\in {E}_{S} \cap a\rho $ (respectively, $r\in \mathrm{Reg} (S)\cap a\rho $), where ${E}_{S} $ (respectively, $\mathrm{Reg} (S)$) denotes the set of all idempotents (respectively, regular elements) of $S$. Moreover, a semigroup $S$ is said to be idempotent-regular-surjective if it is both idempotent-surjective and regular-surjective. We show that any regular congruence on an idempotent-regular-surjective (respectively, regular-surjective) semigroup is uniquely determined by its kernel and trace (respectively, the set of equivalence classes containing idempotents). Finally, we prove that all structurally regular semigroups are idempotent-regular-surjective.