We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
To save content items to your account,
please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies.
If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account.
Find out more about saving content to .
To save content items to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org
is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings
on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part
of your Kindle email address below.
Find out more about saving to your Kindle.
Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations.
‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi.
‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
In January 2014, the EU and China decided to launch negotiations on a bilateral treaty addressing the promotion and protection of investment between the two parties. This chapter examines the legal positions from which the parties will conduct their negotiations in terms of the nondiscriminatory standards, i.e., the national treatment and the most-favored-nation treatment, by focusing on the evolution of nondiscriminatory standards in China’s BITs against the same standards in the EU BITs, in particular the EU’s recently concluded three important treaties regulating, among other things, foreign investment, with Canada, Singapore and Vietnam. Domestically, the reference value of BITs signed by China in the 1980s and 1990s has been significantly affected by the dynamic economic reform and market development in the past four decades. Essentially, globalization has fundamentally lifted China’s foreign investment standards up to international standards. As a result, while the market anticipates difficulties in the ongoing negotiations, the gap between EU and China should be noticeably slight when the EU and China come to negotiate the nondiscriminatory standards.
Recommend this
Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this to your organisation's collection.